Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Thermoregulation Variation in Vertebrates Reveals Differences in Thermal Fatigue Resistance of Bones

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Bones of ectothermic vertebrates resist thermal fatigue better than those of endotherms.

desk verdict Plausible new comparative result, but the missing non-cycled control data is a load-bearing gap that keeps this from being more than a suggestive observation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18613 v1 pith:RH7MET6F submitted 2025-04-25 physics.bio-ph physics.app-ph

classification physics.bio-phphysics.app-ph
keywords thermalfatigueboneectothermendothermresonantultrasoundspectroscopyelasticpropertiesthermoregulationfrequencyshift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests an evolutionary hypothesis: because ectothermic vertebrates routinely experience body-temperature swings, their bones should resist thermal fatigue better than those of endotherms, whose internal temperatures stay nearly constant. The authors cycled cylindrical samples of compact and spongy bone from alligator (ectotherm) and horse and cow (endotherms) between 0°C and 40°C for 1,400 cycles over 29 days, using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to track shifts in resonant frequencies as a proxy for stiffness change. The alligator bones showed minimal frequency shifts, while horse and cow bones shifted substantially, and an ANOVA found thermoregulation strategy (species) to be the only consistently significant factor. If correct, this identifies thermoregulation strategy as a determinant of bone's thermal-fatigue resistance, with potential lessons for materials that endure cyclic thermal stress.

What carries the argument

The measurement engine is Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS): each bone cylinder is held between two piezoelectric transducers, a drive signal sweeps frequency, and the sample's natural resonance peaks are recorded. The load-bearing link is that these resonant frequencies are governed by the elastic constants through a Rayleigh-Ritz eigenvalue formulation, so a shift in a resonant peak is a direct, quantitative sign of a change in stiffness. The paper deliberately does not invert the measured frequencies to obtain elastic constants, because bone's anisotropy, inhomogeneity, and surface irregularity make the inverse problem unreliable; instead, the average shift of three selected peaks (plus area under the spectrum) is the quantity that carries the comparison.

What would settle it

Report the frequency shifts of the six non-cycled control samples (two per species) from their 30-day-apart RUS measurements: if those shifts are as large as the shifts seen in thermally cycled endotherm bones, the claimed species difference would collapse, because the same drift would occur without any cycling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated the way the authors present it, is that bones of ectothermic vertebrates have retained a capacity to withstand repeated thermal stress that bones of endothermic vertebrates have largely lost. In the experiment, the American alligator samples (both compact and spongy) showed small or mixed-sign resonant-frequency shifts after 1,400 cycles between 0°C and 40°C, whereas the horse and cow samples showed large downward shifts, indicating a reduction in elastic constants and therefore stiffness. The species factor was significant for all three response metrics (p < 0.0001 for the two shift measures, p = 0.0078 for the area-under-curve measure), while bone type and bone position were not consistently significant. The authors frame the result as evidence that thermal-fatigue resistance in bone tracks thermoregulation strategy, and as a proof-of-concept for using ectotherm bone as a model for fatigue-resistant engineered materials.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central comparison assumes that the larger frequency shifts in endotherm bones were caused by thermal cycling, but the results of the non-cycled control samples (described as measured 30 days apart) are never reported, so moisture loss or relaxation over 29 days cannot be ruled out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ectothermic bone retains its elastic properties through 1,400 thermal cycles that measurably degrade endothermic bone, implying a real difference in thermal-fatigue resistance between the two groups.
  • Because resonant-frequency shifts were smaller in alligator bone regardless of whether the sample was compact or spongy, the protective trait appears to be a property of the bone tissue itself rather than one macroscopic bone type.
  • Thermoregulation strategy, not skeletal site or bone composition, dominated the statistical response, so an organism's thermal history is a plausible predictor of bone's thermal durability.
  • The result opens a concrete design target: replicate the micro- or nanoscale features of ectotherm bone in aerospace composites or thermal barrier coatings that face cyclic temperature extremes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive extension would re-run the protocol on hydrated bone or bone kept in a physiologically buffered environment; the samples here were dried and stored, so the measured fatigue resistance may describe dry bone, not living bone.
  • The comparison uses one ectotherm species against two mammal species; testing additional ectotherms and endotherms matched for body mass and bone density would show whether the effect is thermoregulation strategy or alligator-specific bone quality.
  • The 0–40°C cycle range mirrors alligator habitat temperatures but is an extreme excursion for mammal bone, so part of the observed difference may simply be that mammal bone is not adapted to any large thermal swing, rather than a specific fatigue-damage mechanism unique to endotherms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper tests the hypothesis that bone from ectothermic vertebrates has higher resistance to thermal cycling fatigue than bone from endothermic vertebrates. Thirty-one bone specimens (29 cycled, six described as non-cycled controls) from cow, horse, and American alligator were measured with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy before and after 1,400 thermal cycles between 0 and 40 °C. The authors quantify shifts in manually selected resonant peaks and report that alligator bone showed much smaller shifts than cow or horse bone. An ANOVA (Table 4) is used to argue that species (or thermoregulatory type) is a significant factor for the three response variables. The paper concludes that ectothermic bone has superior thermal fatigue resistance and suggests implications for bioinspired aerospace materials.

Significance. If the central finding is confirmed, it would be an interesting comparative biomechanics result with potential design inspiration for thermal-fatigue-resistant materials. The study makes a useful methodological choice by using resonant-frequency shifts as a relative proxy for stiffness changes, and it is transparent that full elastic-tensor inversion was not attempted. The manuscript also documents a detailed thermal-cycling protocol and a clear factorial intent. However, the current evidence is incomplete: the non-cycled control data are not reported, the ANOVA structure is internally inconsistent, the response metric relies on manual peak selection, and the ectotherm group contains only a single species. These gaps currently prevent the broad ectotherm-versus-endotherm conclusion from being fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1.1, §3, Table 3] The non-cycled control samples (two per species, six total) and the repeated-characterization checks are described in §2.1.1 as controls intended to confirm that frequency shifts are due to thermal cycling rather than material relaxation, yet no control data are reported anywhere in the Results, Table 3, or the ANOVA. Without a cycled-versus-control comparison, the 29-day interval between measurements leaves moisture loss, sample relaxation, and handling/transducer-contact variability as viable alternative explanations for the observed shifts. This is load-bearing for the central claim, so the control measurements must be shown and compared statistically with the cycled samples.
  2. [§3.1.1, Table 4] The definitions of Factor B and the ANOVA table are inconsistent. In §3.1.1, Factor B is defined as "Species (endothermic or ectothermic)", which is a two-level factor, but Table 4 reports "B-Species" with 2 degrees of freedom, implying three species levels. In addition, the Model sums of squares equal the B-Species sums of squares and the model has only 2 degrees of freedom, indicating that a one-way ANOVA was performed rather than the three-factor design described in §3.1.1. The authors should clarify the exact fitted model and, crucially, recognize that with only one ectothermic species, species identity and thermoregulatory mode are completely aliased; separating these requires additional ectotherm species or a stated assumption.
  3. [§3.1, Fig. 4] The primary response variables are computed from three resonance peaks selected manually by the user through a MATLAB prompt ("prompted the user to select three peaks"). No blinding, automated peak-selection rule, or inter-operator repeatability data are provided. Because the response is the difference between pre- and post-cycling selected peaks, manual selection could bias the measured shifts, especially if the operator is aware of species identity. The authors should either describe an automated/rule-based peak-matching procedure or report the variability of the selection method (e.g., independent selections by multiple operators).
  4. [§2, Conclusions] The ectotherm group consists of a single species, Alligator mississippiensis, while the endotherm group consists of two mammalian species (cow and horse). The abstract and conclusion make general claims about "ectothermic species" and "endothermic species", which overgeneralize from one ectotherm lineage. To support the broad claim, the conclusion should be explicitly limited to the tested species, or the authors should add ectotherm species from a different clade. This is not purely a wording issue because the mechanistic hypothesis about evolved thermal-cycling adaptation is much stronger than what a single species can test.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The strain tensor definition appears to have index errors: the two terms are identical rather than transposed, so the antisymmetric part is missing.
  2. [Table 3, Response 3] Table 3 lists 29 rows, but the ANOVA for Response 3 reports 27 total degrees of freedom, implying n=28. Please reconcile the sample counts or clarify how missing values were handled.
  3. [Fig. 4] The figure caption describes frequency shifts but the axes are not clearly labeled in the figure as provided; please add explicit axis units and a scale bar so the reader can gauge the magnitude of the shifts.
  4. [References] Reference [27] (Kinney et al., 2004) is duplicated as reference [21]; renumber the list and update in-text citations accordingly.
  5. [Table 2] The Setpoint column lists "N/A" for soak steps; specifying the soak temperature setpoints would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper directly compares measured resonant-frequency shifts across species; the central claim is an empirical observation, not a derivation from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is comparative and empirical: bones from endothermic species showed larger resonant-frequency shifts after thermal cycling than bones from an ectothermic species. The response variables (Shift, Absolute Individual Shift, and Area Under the Curve) are computed directly from measured RUS spectra, and the paper explicitly states 'in this study, the inverse computation is not performed' (Section 1), so the elastic constants are never inverted from a fitted model. Factor B (Species) is an independent categorical input in the ANOVA, not a quantity derived from the responses. The self-citations to RUS methodology (references 12-16 and 23) support the measurement technique but do not define the outcome, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The missing report of the six non-cycled controls described in Section 2.1.1 is a potential validity/confounding issue, not a circularity issue, because the comparison would remain a direct measurement even if the controls were reported. Thus the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs, and no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RUS proxy assumption, manual mode identification, species representativeness, and unshown controls. No numeric free parameters are fitted to data; the main unverified assumption is that the unshown controls would exhibit no shifts.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Resonant frequency shifts are a reliable proxy for elastic constant changes in these bone samples.
    Section 2.1 states inverse RUS was not performed and that shifts in resonant peaks serve as reliable proxies for changes in elastic constants.
  • domain assumption The three manually selected peaks represent the same vibrational modes before and after thermal cycling.
    Section 3.1 describes a MATLAB script that prompts the user to select three peaks; accurate shift comparison requires mode identity to be preserved across cycling.
  • domain assumption The American alligator represents ectothermic vertebrates and the horse and cow represent endothermic vertebrates for this comparison.
    Section 2 uses one ectotherm species and two endotherm species to draw the ectotherm/endotherm contrast and acknowledges interspecies variations.
  • domain assumption Thermal cycling between 0 C and 40 C simulates the natural thermal variation experienced by large alligators.
    Section 2.2 states the protocol was designed to simulate thermal variations that large alligators may experience in natural environments.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-cycled control samples would show negligible frequency shifts.
    Controls are described in Section 2.1.1 but no data are provided; the attribution of shifts to thermal cycling relies on this unshown assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermoregulation Variation in Vertebrates Reveals Differences in Thermal Fatigue Resistance of Bones." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RH7MET6F

@misc{pith2026250418613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermoregulation Variation in Vertebrates Reveals Differences in Thermal Fatigue Resistance of Bones},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RH7MET6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18613}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we propose the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in thermal cycling fatigue resistance between the bones of ectothermic and endothermic animals. We performed an experiment to test whether bones of endothermic animals, having potentially lost their ability to adapt to thermal cycling, exhibit reduced resistance to thermal fatigue compared to ectothermic animals, which may have retained this adaptive trait due to their environmental conditions. The change in stiffness were determined using shifts in the resonant peaks of the frequency spectrum obtained from Resonant Ultrasonic Spectroscopy (RUS). To achieve this, samples of compact (cortical) and spongy bone tissue were extracted and polished before undergoing a 29-day period of thermal cycling. The changes in the resonance frequencies were then observed. Changes in resonant frequencies imply corresponding changes in elastic constants. The primary findings indicated that bones from ectothermic species exhibited minimal changes in elastic properties compared to those from endothermic species, as evidenced by the smaller shifts in resonant peak magnitudes following thermal cycling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Emulating materials that have been naturally refined over millions of years of evolution can help overcome the current limitations of micro-architectured materials, particularly in terms of weight, fatigue and environmental resistance [3]. Recent advances in micro-fabrication techniques, like additive manufacturing with various materials such...

  2. [2]

    thermal boost

    Materials and Methods/Procedure This study analyzed 29 specimens of compact and spongy bone tissue from three species with differing thermoregulatory mechanisms: two endothermic species, horse (equus ferus caballus) and cow (bos taurus), and one ectothermic species, American alligator ( alligator mississippiensis). Two mammalian species were selected to a...

  3. [3]

    Results and Discussion The primary objective of the RUS data analysis was to quantify potential differences in fatigue resistance between bones from endothermic and ectothermic species. Across all 29 samples, the resonant frequency shifts in bones from endothermic species were consistently larger than that observed in an ectothermic specie, as illustrated...

  4. [4]

    RUS analysis revealed distinct differences in the responses of the two groups

    Conclusion and Future Work This study investigated the effects of thermal cycling on the elastic properties of bones from endothermic and ectothermic species. RUS analysis revealed distinct differences in the responses of the two groups. Bones from ectothermic species exhibited minimal shifts in resonant frequencies, suggesting high thermal fatigue resist...

  5. [5]

    Ultralight Metallic Microlattices,

    T. A. Schaedler et al., "Ultralight Metallic Microlattices," Science, vol. 334, no. 6058, pp. 962-965, 2011, doi: doi:10.1126/science.1211649

  6. [6]

    Effects of ambient temperatures between 5 and 35 °C on energy balance, body mass and body composition in mice,

    Z. Zhao et al., "Effects of ambient temperatures between 5 and 35 °C on energy balance, body mass and body composition in mice," Molecular Metabolism, vol. 64, p. 101551, 2022/10/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101551

  7. [7]

    Freezing Risk in Tropical High-Elevation Anurans: An Assessment Based on the Andean Frog Pristimantis nervicus (Strobomantidae),

    J. Carvajalino-Fernández, M. Gomez, and C. Navas, "Freezing Risk in Tropical High-Elevation Anurans: An Assessment Based on the Andean Frog Pristimantis nervicus (Strobomantidae)," South American Journal of Herpetology, vol. 6, pp. 73-78, 08/01 2011, doi: 10.2994/057.006.0205

  8. [8]

    Bioinspired structural materials,

    U. G. K. Wegst, H. Bai, E. Saiz, A. P. Tomsia, and R. O. Ritchie, "Bioinspired structural materials," Nature Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23-36, 2015/01/01 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmat4089

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects,

    J. R. Tumbleston et al., "Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects," Science, vol. 347, no. 6228, pp. 1349-1352, 2015, doi: doi:10.1126/science.aaa2397

  2. [10]

    Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy,

    J. Maynard, "Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy," (in English), Phys. Today, Article vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 26-31, Jan 1996. [Online]. Available: <Go to ISI>://A1996TQ12600009

  3. [11]

    A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants,

    Z. Li, Q. Wang, and G. Liu, "A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants," (in eng), Micromachines (Basel), vol. 13, no. 4, Mar 27 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13040528

  4. [12]

    Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement,

    N. H. Hart et al., "Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement," (in eng), J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 347-371, Sep 1 2020

  5. [13]

    Bone-inspired microarchitectures achieve enhanced fatigue life,

    A. M. Torres et al., "Bone-inspired microarchitectures achieve enhanced fatigue life," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 49, pp. 24457-24462, 2019, doi: doi:10.1073/pnas.1905814116

  6. [14]

    Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy,

    R. Leisure and F. A. Willis, "Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy," Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 9, p. 6001, 01/01 1999, doi: 10.1088/0953- 8984/9/28/002

  7. [15]

    Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for a sample with cantilever boundary condition using Rayleigh-Ritz method,

    F. Farzbod, "Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for a sample with cantilever boundary condition using Rayleigh-Ritz method," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 114, no. 2, p. 024902, 2013

  8. [16]

    On the normal modes of free vibration of inhomogeneous and anisotropic elastic objects,

    W. M. Visscher, A. Migliori, T. M. Bell, and R. A. Reinert, "On the normal modes of free vibration of inhomogeneous and anisotropic elastic objects," (in English), J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Article vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 2154-2162, Oct 1991. [Online]. Available: <Go to ISI>://A1991GJ14700046

  9. [17]

    Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: Sensitivity Analysis for Isotropic Materials and Anisotropic Materials With Cubic Symmetry,

    F. Farzbod and O. E. Scott-Emuakpor, "Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: Sensitivity Analysis for Isotropic Materials and Anisotropic Materials With Cubic Symmetry," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 021010- 021010-10, 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4041593

  10. [18]

    Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: Sensitivity Analysis for Anisotropic Materials With Hexagonal Symmetry,

    C. L. Sevigney, O. E. Scott-Emuakpor, and F. Farzbod, "Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: Sensitivity Analysis for Anisotropic Materials With Hexagonal Symmetry," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 144, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1115/1.4053263

  11. [19]

    inverse computation

    and elastomers [20] . In the medical field, RUS has been implemented to determine the elastic constants of hydrated human dentin [21] and compact bones [22]. The most common method for determining mechanical resonances in RUS employs piezoelectric transducers to excite and mea...

  12. [20]

    Application of laser-based resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to study texture in copper,

    D. H. Hurley, S. J. Reese, and F. Farzbod, "Application of laser-based resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to study texture in copper," (in English), J. Appl. Phys., Article vol. 111, no. 5, 2012, doi: 053527 10.1063/1.3692386

  13. [21]

    Using Eigenmodes to Perform the Inverse Problem Associated with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy,

    F. Farzbod and D. H. Hurley, "Using Eigenmodes to Perform the Inverse Problem Associated with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy," IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 59, no. 11, 2012

  14. [22]

    Measurements of Elastic Constants in Thin Films of Colossal Magnetoresistance Material,

    J. H. So, J. R. Gladden, Y. F. Hu, J. D. Maynard, and Q. Li, "Measurements of Elastic Constants in Thin Films of Colossal Magnetoresistance Material," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, no. 3, p. 036103, 01/24/ 2003. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.036103

  15. [23]

    High- temperature elastic moduli of bulk nanostructured $n$- and $p$-type silicon germanium,

    J. R. Gladden, G. Li, R. Adebisi, S. Firdosy, T. Caillat, and V. Ravi, "High- temperature elastic moduli of bulk nanostructured $n$- and $p$-type silicon germanium," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 82, no. 4, p. 045209, 07/30/ 2010. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phy...

  16. [24]

    Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Hydrated Cement Paste Using Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy,

    W. Wu, A. Al-Ostaz, J. Gladden, A. Cheng, and G. Li, "Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Hydrated Cement Paste Using Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy," 2010

  17. [25]

    Using resonance to measure the independent elastic constants of problematic materials such as elastomers,

    J. D. Maynard, "Using resonance to measure the independent elastic constants of problematic materials such as elastomers," JASA Express Letters, vol. 1, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.1121/10.0008942

  18. [27]

    Accurate measurement of cortical bone elasticity tensor with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy,

    S. Bernard, Q. Grimal, and P. Laugier, "Accurate measurement of cortical bone elasticity tensor with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy," Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 18, pp. 12-19, 2013 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.09.017

  19. [28]

    Using eigenmodes to perform the inverse problem associated with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy,

    F. Farzbod and D. H. Hurley, "Using eigenmodes to perform the inverse problem associated with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy," IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 2470- 2475, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2479

  20. [29]

    Interspecies Differences in Bone Composition, Density, and Quality: Potential Implications for in Vivo Bone Research*,

    J. Aerssens, S. Boonen, G. Lowet, and J. Dequeker, "Interspecies Differences in Bone Composition, Density, and Quality: Potential Implications for in Vivo Bone Research*," Endocrinology, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 663-670, 1998, doi: 10.1210/endo.139.2.5751

  21. [30]

    Maximal Aerobic and Anaerobic Power Generation in Large Crocodiles versus Mammals: Implications for Dinosaur Gigantothermy,

    R. S. Seymour, "Maximal Aerobic and Anaerobic Power Generation in Large Crocodiles versus Mammals: Implications for Dinosaur Gigantothermy," PLOS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, p. e69361, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069361

  22. [31]

    Body temperature null distributions in reptiles with nonzero heat capacity: seasonal thermoregulation in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis),

    F. Seebacher, R. M. Elsey, and P. L. Trosclair III, "Body temperature null distributions in reptiles with nonzero heat capacity: seasonal thermoregulation in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)," Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 348-359, 2003

  23. [32]

    Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurements of the elastic constants of human dentin,

    J. H. Kinney, J. R. Gladden, G. W. Marshall, S. J. Marshall, J. H. So, and J. D. Maynard, "Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurements of the elastic constants of human dentin," Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 437- 441, 2004/04/01/ 2004, doi: http://dx.doi.org/1...

  24. [33]

    Quantification of stiffness measurement errors in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy of human cortical bone,

    X. Cai et al., "Quantification of stiffness measurement errors in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy of human cortical bone," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 2755-2765, 2017, doi: 10.1121/1.5009453

  25. [34]

    Thermal Cycling Effects on the Fatigue Behaviour of Low Carbon Steel,

    A. Agbadua, C. Mgbemena, C. Mgbemena, and L. Chima, "Thermal Cycling Effects on the Fatigue Behaviour of Low Carbon Steel," Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, vol. 10, 01/01 2011, doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2011.1014106

  26. [35]

    Influence of Thermal Cycling on Dentin Bond Strengths of Single- step Self-etch Adhesive Systems,

    Y. Asaka et al., "Influence of Thermal Cycling on Dentin Bond Strengths of Single- step Self-etch Adhesive Systems," Operative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 73-78, 2007, doi: 10.2341/06-21

  27. [36]

    Spatial ecology and habitat utilization of American alligators in an urban-influenced ecosystem,

    C. B. Eversole, S. E. Henke, D. B. Wester, B. M. Ballard, R. L. Powell, and S. Glasscock, "Spatial ecology and habitat utilization of American alligators in an urban-influenced ecosystem," Journal of Urban Ecology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1093/jue/juy018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.