REVIEW 1 cited by
STDArm: Transferring Visuomotor Policies From Static Data Training to Dynamic Robot Manipulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in mobile robotic platforms like quadruped robots and drones have spurred a demand for deploying visuomotor policies in increasingly dynamic environments. However, the collection of high-quality training data, the impact of platform motion and processing delays, and limited onboard computing resources pose significant barriers to existing solutions. In this work, we present STDArm, a system that directly transfers policies trained under static conditions to dynamic platforms without extensive modifications. The core of STDArm is a real-time action correction framework consisting of: (1) an action manager to boost control frequency and maintain temporal consistency, (2) a stabilizer with a lightweight prediction network to compensate for motion disturbances, and (3) an online latency estimation module for calibrating system parameters. In this way, STDArm achieves centimeter-level precision in mobile manipulation tasks. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of the proposed STDArm on two types of robotic arms, four types of mobile platforms, and three tasks. Experimental results indicate that the STDArm enables real-time compensation for platform motion disturbances while preserving the original policy's manipulation capabilities, achieving centimeter-level operational precision during robot motion.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CAC-VLA: Context-Gated Action Conditioning for Vision-Language-Action Models
VLM-predicted coarse-to-fine latent actions, injected through a learned context gate, improve continuous action-expert control on LIBERO (98.3%) and LIBERO-Plus (89.5%).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.