Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

ARMOR: Adaptive Meshing with Reinforcement Optimization for Real-time 3D Monitoring in Unexposed Scenes

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adaptive, reinforcement-learned parameter selection enables real-time neural SDF meshing in unexposed scenes with lower geometric error than fixed-parameter baselines.

desk verdict Useful adaptive meshing system, but the headline '3.96% error reduction' is actually an F-score percentage-point gain, and the single-baseline evaluation leaves the RL contribution under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19624 v1 pith:OB6ROYCS submitted 2025-04-28 cs.RO

Yizhe Zhang , Jianping Li , Xin Zhao , Fuxun Liang , Zhen Dong , Bisheng Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords LiDARSLAMreal-timemeshingimplicitneuralfieldssigneddistancereinforcementlearningadaptiveparameteroptimizationundergroundmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ARMOR claims that the quality bottleneck in real-time underground meshing is not the neural field itself but the fixed reconstruction parameters used to train it, and that reinforcement learning can replace manual tuning by choosing parameters from local scene structure. The paper builds an online pipeline that aggregates LiDAR frames into temporal blocks, smooths normals with an L0-regularized orientation procedure, and trains a PPO agent, entirely in simulation, to select six sampling and meshing parameters for a point-based neural signed distance field (SDF) at each step. On more than 3,000 meters of tunnels, caves, and lava tubes, the complete system reports lower Chamfer distance, higher F-scores, and a 3.96% reduction in geometric error compared with a strong fixed-parameter implicit-SLAM baseline, while keeping reconstruction real-time. The sympathetic reading is that adaptive parameter selection plus projection-error-free SDF labels together make implicit neural meshing usable in places where manual tuning is impractical.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism has three cooperating parts. First, the scanblock: fixed-duration aggregations of LiDAR frames that densify the cloud and enable multi-view normal orientation through a multi-segment centroid line, followed by an L0-minimization normal smoother that suppresses orientation noise while preserving detail. Second, normal-guided sampling: SDF training labels are computed as true distances along smoothed normals inside a truncation band, replacing projective distances that systematically overestimate surface proximity. Third, the reinforcement meshing network: a sparse-convolution encoder converts a downsampled local neural map into a state embedding, an actor-critic policy with a PPO clipped objective maps that embedding to six discrete reconstruction parameters, and a composite reward of accuracy, completeness, Chamfer distance, and F-score shapes the policy. The agent is what makes the pipeline adaptive; the smoothing and sampling modules are what make the reward landscape trustworthy in sparse, noisy, geometry-heavy scenes.

What would settle it

Re-run the real-world evaluations with the learned policy replaced by a per-scene grid-searched fixed parameter set while keeping the smoothing module unchanged; if the best fixed parameters match or beat ARMOR's F-score and Chamfer distance on the same sequences, the claim that adaptive RL is what reduces error by 3.96% is falsified. A cheaper check would compare the policy's chosen action distribution on simulated versus real scanblocks and test whether any systematic mismatch correlates with metric drops.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed by the paper is that scene-adaptive, learned parameter control and true-distance SDF supervision, not a more powerful network, are what let implicit neural meshing work online in unexposed environments. ARMOR represents the scene as neural points with an auto-decoder SDF, samples training points along smoothed surface normals instead of along LiDAR beams so that labels are true signed distances rather than projective approximations, and lets a six-dimensional RL action space, governing sampling spread, surface and free-space sample counts, ray-ratio bounds, and nearest-neighbor support threshold, respond to the current local map. The agent is trained with PPO in a LiDAR simulator against geometric rewards derived from accuracy, completeness, Chamfer distance, and F-score, then run on real handheld and helmet-mounted scans. Across three synthetic scenes, two open cave datasets, and a lava-tube field deployment, the complete method outperforms the point-based implicit baseline and its own ablation without RL, with the largest gains in geometrically complex regions, and with 94.8% of the lava-tube mesh points falling within five centimeters of a comparison reconstruction.

Load-bearing premise

The learned parameter policy is trained only in a simulator and is then trusted, with no closed-loop retraining, to transfer to real-world scans from other LiDAR sensors; if that transfer fails, the reinforcement-learning module is no better than a fixed parameter choice and the reported improvement would have to come entirely from the smoothing module.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported gains hold, real-time mesh reconstructions in cave surveys, tunnel inspections, and lava-tube monitoring can be produced on-site by a single operator with a helmet or handheld scanner, without a post-processing step that takes hours.
  • A policy trained in simulation appears to transfer across LiDAR types and site categories in the paper's experiments, suggesting that one learned parameter policy may serve many unexposed sites instead of per-site manual tuning.
  • Because sampling and meshing parameters are chosen online, the system can trade geometric fidelity against frame rate on the fly, reducing free-space sampling once the map is stable, which is useful for battery- or compute-limited field robots.
  • Removing projective-distance SDF labels corrects the systematic volume inflation seen in baseline meshes; in the tunnel construction test, the reported excavation volume error drops to 1.11% relative to ground truth, making the mesh usable for over- and under-excavation analysis.
  • The real-time property means safety monitoring and structural assessment can use current geometry rather than delayed survey products, which directly addresses the response-time gap that motivates the work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sim-to-real transfer generalizes, the same Markov-decision-process formulation could be applied to other parameter-sensitive reconstruction systems, such as outdoor LiDAR meshing or dense visual SLAM, wherever a simulator can supply ground truth for reward.
  • The fixed 15 cm F-score threshold in the reward means the policy is tuned for fidelity at that scale; a monitoring task that cares about centimeter-level structural detail would need the threshold moved and the policy retrained, so the reported 3.96% improvement is partly reward-design-dependent.
  • The helmet deployment on a low-power processor hints that the adaptive policy is cheap enough to run on embedded hardware, which would make real-time monitoring a wearable, continuous process rather than a scheduled survey.
  • The ablation leaves room for a decomposition experiment that the paper does not isolate: measuring how much of the gain comes from the learned policy versus the smoothing and sampling modules alone, which would clarify which component future systems should build on.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ARMOR, an online 3D meshing framework for underground and other unexposed environments, built on a point-based neural implicit signed distance field (SDF) representation. It contributes three components: (1) spatio-temporal geometry smoothing using temporally aggregated scanblocks, L0-regularized normal refinement, and a multi-segment centroid normal orientation method; (2) normal-guided sampling to replace projective SDF labels; and (3) a PPO-trained reinforcement learning agent that selects six reconstruction parameters based on local neural point features, with a composite reward of accuracy, completeness, Chamfer-L1, and F-score. The system is evaluated on three synthetic MARSIM scenes and on real SuperLoc cave, WHU-Helmet tunnel, and an in-house lava-tube sequence, comparing against PIN-SLAM and an ablation without the RL module. The abstract claims a 3.96% reduction in geometric error relative to state-of-the-art baselines while maintaining real-time efficiency.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper addresses an operational need: automatic, real-time mesh generation in GNSS-denied underground environments without manual parameter tuning. The consistent quantitative improvements over PIN-SLAM across all six scenes, the ablation isolating the RL component, and the real-world evaluation against TLS reference data are genuine strengths. The volumetric tunnel-construction application is also a useful demonstration. However, the headline quantitative claim is misreported, the comparison set is narrow, no variance information is given, and the real-time efficiency claim is not directly measured.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusion; Tables 2-4] The claim that ARMOR reduces geometric error by 3.96% is not supported by the reported data. Averaging the six F-score rows in Tables 2-4 gives 87.91% for PIN-SLAM and 91.87% for ARMOR, a difference of 3.96 percentage points; this is the only computation that reproduces the headline number. F-score is a harmonic mean of precision and recall at a fixed distance threshold, not a geometric error in centimeters, and the thresholds differ across the tables (15 cm in Table 2, 30 cm in Table 3, and 10 cm in Table 4), so averaging these into a single geometric-error percentage is not meaningful. The pooled Chamfer-L1 reduction from the same tables is roughly 9.2%, and per-scene reductions range from about 4.8% to 15.6%; none equals 3.96%. The abstract and conclusion must either state an F-score improvement of 3.96 percentage points or report a properly computed pooled geometric-error metric.
  2. [Sections 5.3-5.5] The evaluation uses only PIN-SLAM as a baseline, despite the abstract referring to state-of-the-art baselines in the plural, and no variance or number of independent runs is reported for any of Tables 2-4. Without repeated runs or standard deviations, the observed differences cannot be distinguished from run-to-run noise, and the absence of a second recent implicit LiDAR mapping baseline (e.g., SHINE-Mapping, LONER, or N3-Mapping) leaves the state-of-the-art claim unsubstantiated. Please add at least one additional relevant baseline and report means and standard deviations over multiple runs.
  3. [Section 4.2.4, Eq. (9); Tables 2-4] The training reward in Eq. (9) is a weighted sum of accuracy, completeness, Chamfer distance, and F-score, and the reported evaluation metrics are exactly those four quantities, with the synthetic F-score threshold of 15 cm matching the F-score reward threshold described in Section 4.2.4. This is not full circularity because the real-world evaluation uses TLS reference data not present during training, but it does mean the simulation results partly reflect optimization of the evaluation metric itself. The paper should acknowledge this overlap explicitly and report at least one quantitative criterion that is not part of the reward; the volumetric error in Section 5.6 is a useful step and could be extended to the other real scenes.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Remark 2] The RL policy is trained only in MARSIM with a Livox Mid-360 sensor, yet it is deployed on SuperLoc sequences acquired with a Velodyne VLP-16 and on WHU-Helmet data from a Livox Mid-360. Remark 2 asserts that simulation-trained strategies generalize effectively to previously unseen real-world scenarios, but no direct evidence about the learned policy's behavior on real data is provided, such as distributions of selected actions, comparison with fixed tuned parameters, or sensitivity to sensor type. The aggregate F-score improvements are consistent with successful transfer, but since adaptive parameter selection is a central contribution, the paper should provide direct evidence of this adaptive behavior rather than only its downstream effect.
  5. [Section 5] The abstract and title emphasize real-time 3D monitoring, but no runtime or latency measurements are reported anywhere in Section 5. There is no table comparing per-frame or per-scanblock processing time between ARMOR, the w/o RL ablation, and PIN-SLAM, and no discussion of the computational cost of the RL agent or the sparse-convolution encoder. Please include quantitative timing results, ideally on the same hardware, to support the real-time efficiency claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5.4 and Table 3] The text says the authors select the Cave01 and Cave02 sequences from SuperLoc, while Table 3 is headed with cave01 and cave04; the sequence labels should be reconciled.
  2. [Eqs. (7), (10), and Section 5.1] The notation for the L0 smoothing hyperparameters is inconsistent: Eq. (7) uses eta as the L0 weight, Eq. (10) introduces beta for the convergence weight, and Section 5.1 fixes both a smoothing weight beta and a preservation weight eta. Please define each symbol once and align the notation between the equations and the experimental setup.
  3. [Eq. (5)] The scanblock construction in Eq. (5) would be clearer if the concatenation were written as an explicit sequence of transformed frames rather than a sum, and if the concatenation operator were defined in the text.
  4. [Figures and text] There are several typographical errors, including Trajctory in the Figure 3 caption, 'the the Cave01 and Cave02' in Section 5.4, and 'artifacts cased by SDF label error' in Section 5.4; these should be corrected.
  5. [Tables 2-4] The F-score thresholds differ across the tables (15 cm, 30 cm, and 10 cm) without explanation; a brief justification or a fixed-threshold sensitivity analysis would help the reader interpret the results.
  6. [Section 5.5] The Xianren Lava Tube evaluation reports that 94.8% of points fall within a +/-5 cm threshold of a reference produced with Leica Cyclone 3DR, but the reference itself is not described; please specify what the mesh-to-mesh distance was computed against and how the reference model was generated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RL policy is trained in simulation on reward metrics and evaluated on held-out real-world scenes, so the central claims are not determined by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that an RL-trained parameter-selection policy improves online SDF meshing in unexposed scenes. The reward in Eq. 9 is indeed a weighted combination of transformed accuracy, completeness, Chamfer, and F-score signals, and the same metric family is reported in Tables 2-4. That overlap is not circular, however, because the policy is trained in MARSIM simulation against simulated ground truth (Section 5.2) and then evaluated on held-out real-world datasets the agent did not train on: SuperLoc, WHU-Helmet, and the in-house Xianren Lava Tube tests (Sections 5.4-5.5). The reported gains are therefore measurements of generalization rather than a restatement of the training objective. The paper's self-citations, including the reference to the authors' earlier underground-meshing work and the PSS-BA-inspired L0 normal smoothing, are not load-bearing: the L0 smoothing is re-derived with full optimization details in Appendix A, and the earlier work is cited only to motivate remaining challenges. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, no ansatz is smuggled in through a citation, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The headline claim that ARMOR 'reduc[es] geometric error by 3.96%' appears to be a misstatement of an F-score percentage-point improvement, but that is a metric-reporting and correctness issue, not a circularity of derivation. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks once the headline metric is read correctly.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's gains rest on several hand-set parameters (scanblock size, smoothing radii/weights, reward weights) plus an unreported truncation distance and action-space configuration. It also assumes that simulation-trained RL transfers to real sensors and that smoothed normals make normal-guided SDF labels unbiased. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • scanblock size = 20 frames
    Hand-set in Section 5.1 to balance efficiency and temporal consistency; affects normal stability and density.
  • normal estimation radius and neighbor count = 2 m, max 20 neighbors
    Hand-set in Section 5.1; controls PCA neighborhood and L0 smoothing graph.
  • L0 smoothing weights = beta=1.0, eta=0.1
    Hand-set in Section 5.1; control data fidelity vs smoothing in Eq. 7.
  • reward weights = lambda_1=lambda_2=lambda_3=1, lambda_4=2
    Hand-set in Table 1; F-score weight doubled, shaping the RL objective.
  • SDF truncation distance t_r = not reported
    Defines the truncation region for normal-guided sampling in Section 4.2.1, a key parameter for SDF learning, but no value is given.
  • RL action space discretization and bounds = not reported
    The six action dimensions (sigma_s, N_s, N_f, eta_min, eta_max, N_nn) are selected by the agent, but the allowed ranges or number of discrete bins per dimension are not specified, making the policy untraceable.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Point-based neural implicit auto-decoder with latent features can represent the SDF of underground scenes from LiDAR point clouds.
    Borrowed from DeepSDF/PIN-SLAM/Point-SLAM and used as the scene representation in Section 4.2.1; no proof in this paper.
  • domain assumption Normal-guided sampling along smoothed normals yields unbiased SDF labels, i.e., the smoothed normals approximate true surface normals.
    Section 4.2.1 states that integrating geometry smoothing with normal-guided sampling 'enables more reliable SDF labels'; this is an assumption that the normal estimates are accurate after PCA and L0 smoothing.
  • domain assumption RL policy trained in MARSIM with Livox Mid-360 generalizes to real-world data with different LiDARs and scene distributions.
    Section 5.2 and Remark 2 assert that simulation practice transfers to real environments; no domain-randomization or distribution-shift analysis is provided.
  • standard math The alternating L0 minimization (Eqs. 10-14) converges to a smooth normal field that preserves surface detail.
    The auxiliary-variable solver is standard for L0 smoothing (borrowed from PSS-BA), but convergence to the desired optimum is not analyzed.
  • domain assumption MSC-NVO centroid-line orientation produces globally consistent normal orientations in unexposed scenes.
    Section 4.1 proposes the heuristic; it is not validated against other orientation methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ARMOR: Adaptive Meshing with Reinforcement Optimization for Real-time 3D Monitoring in Unexposed Scenes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OB6ROYCS

@misc{pith2026250419624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ARMOR: Adaptive Meshing with Reinforcement Optimization for Real-time 3D Monitoring in Unexposed Scenes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OB6ROYCS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19624}
}
read the original abstract

Unexposed environments, such as lava tubes, mines, and tunnels, are among the most complex yet strategically significant domains for scientific exploration and infrastructure development. Accurate and real-time 3D meshing of these environments is essential for applications including automated structural assessment, robotic-assisted inspection, and safety monitoring. Implicit neural Signed Distance Fields (SDFs) have shown promising capabilities in online meshing; however, existing methods often suffer from large projection errors and rely on fixed reconstruction parameters, limiting their adaptability to complex and unstructured underground environments such as tunnels, caves, and lava tubes. To address these challenges, this paper proposes ARMOR, a scene-adaptive and reinforcement learning-based framework for real-time 3D meshing in unexposed environments. The proposed method was validated across more than 3,000 meters of underground environments, including engineered tunnels, natural caves, and lava tubes. Experimental results demonstrate that ARMOR achieves superior performance in real-time mesh reconstruction, reducing geometric error by 3.96\% compared to state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining real-time efficiency. The method exhibits improved robustness, accuracy, and adaptability, indicating its potential for advanced 3D monitoring and mapping in challenging unexposed scenarios. The project page can be found at: https://yizhezhang0418.github.io/armor.github.io/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19624 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adaptive Meshing with Reinforcement Optimization for Real-time 3D Monitoring in Underground Sites. Our system processes sequential LiDAR frames through three key stages: (1) spatial-temporal normal vector smoothing to enhance geometric consistency, (2) reinforcement learning-based parameter optimization that adapts to local scene characteristics, and (3) high-fidelity mesh reconstruction. This pipeline enables accur… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architecture of ARMOR. The ARMOR pipeline begins with the preprocessing of sequential LiDAR and IMU data, followed by a spatio-temporal geometry smoothing module that leverages consistency constraints to generate high-quality normal estimations. A reinforcement learning agent then analyzes the characteristics of local neural maps from the previous state 𝑇𝑖−1 and computes a multi￾discrete probability distribution to … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scanblock formation process. Trajctory T(t) shows the continuous movement of LiDAR over interval [𝑡 0 , 𝑡𝐾 ). In each interval, consecutive scan frames will integrate through coordi￾nate transformation, enhancing point cloud density and geometric completeness for improved normal estimation in the unexposed environment. frames tracked by the front-end into temporal blocks based on fixed time intervals. By aggregating… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of our normal-guided sampling strategy for improved reconstruction. Projective distances along the LiDAR ray can introduce inherent SDF label errors in irregular 3D unexposed environments. By integrating enhanced geometry smoothing with normal-guided sampl…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The architecture of agent network. configurations: one series of layers employs progressive downsampling convolutions, systematically expanding the receptive field to capture broader contextual information, while the other set utilizes dilated convolutions to maintain …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Piecewise linear reward mapping functions used in our learning and practice framework: (a) Conversion of distance-based errors (cm) to reward values, and (b) Conversion of F-score in percentages to reward values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative subset of the simulation database used for learning and practice. The illustrated examples cover two primary categories: (a) regular tunnel environments and (b) complex cave environments. Red trajectories in the left panels depict the UAV flight paths, w…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visual comparison of different method in synthetic datasets. 5.4. Evaluation in Open-Sourced Real-world Dataset We evaluate our approach on three challenging real￾world unexposed datasets: one tunnel environment from two cave environments from SuperLoc (Zhao et al., 20…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparative reconstruction results for the SuperLoc Cave01 dataset. The figure presents an incremental comparison among the baseline approach (PIN-SLAM), our method without reinforcement learning (w/o RL), and our complete method, with both the mesh reconstructions (co…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative reconstruction and error visualization results on the WHU-Helmet unexposed tunnel dataset. The visualization includes: (top) the reconstructed mesh generated by our method and colored according to surface normals; (middle) a comparison between our reconstr…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: An in-house helmet-based mapping system. (a) Deploy￾ment illustration showing operator wearing the integrated helmet system during experiment; (b) Close-up view of the core map￾ping equipment; (c)Hardware architecture diagram highlighting key components including Livo…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Qualitative comparison of reconstruction results for the Xianren Lava Tube. Significant differences between our method and the PIN-SLAM baseline are highlighted by bounding boxes. Our approach produces cleaner geometry with better preservation of structural details, e…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Visualization of over-excavation and under-excavation analysis in tunnel construction, showing spatial error distribution between reconstructed models and ground truth. across more than 3000 meters of underground environments, including tunnels, caves, and lava tubes,…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A cross-sectional analysis of Xianren Lava Tube: (a) Reconstructed mesh with horizontal cross-sections, color-coded by elevation gradient. The upper and lower numbers associated with each horizontal line represent the width and height of lava tube, respectively; (b) V…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AEOS: Active Environment-aware Optimal Scanning Control for UAV LiDAR-Inertial Odometry in Complex Scenes

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AEOS actively rotates a UAV's LiDAR using a hybrid MPC and learned cost map, cutting trajectory error versus fixed-speed and optimization-only baselines in simulations and two real scenes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    , author Cuguer \'o -Escofet, N

    author Baraza, X. , author Cuguer \'o -Escofet, N. , author Rodr \' guez-Elizalde, R. , year 2023 . title Statistical analysis of the severity of occupational accidents in the mining sector . journal Journal of safety research volume 86 , pages 364--375

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Department of Labor , year 2024

    author U.S. Department of Labor , year 2024 . title U.s. department of labor press release: Msha announcement . https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/msha/msha20240930. note accessed: 2025-04-23

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    , year 2020

    author Government, T.C. , year 2020 . title Coal mine safety production nationwide remains stable and improving . https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-08/11/content_5534110. note accessed: 2025-04-23

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    , author Benaroya, H

    author Martin, R.P. , author Benaroya, H. , year 2023 . title Pressurized lunar lava tubes for habitation . journal Acta Astronautica volume 204 , pages 157--174

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    , author Wang, Z

    author Si, L. , author Wang, Z. , author Liu, P. , author Tan, C. , author Chen, H. , author Wei, D. , year 2021 . title A novel coal--rock recognition method for coal mining working face based on laser point cloud data . journal IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement volume 70 , pages 1--18

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    , author Yang, X

    author Lin, X. , author Yang, X. , author Yao, W. , author Wang, X. , author Ma, X. , author Ma, B. , year 2024 . title Graph-based adaptive weighted fusion slam using multimodal data in complex underground spaces . journal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing volume 217 , pages 101--119

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    , author Tserng, H

    author Lin, P.H. , author Tserng, H. , author Lin, C.C. , year 2006 . title Automated construction of the paghuashan tunnel for taiwan high speed rail (thsr) project . journal Automation in construction volume 15 , pages 627--639

    work page 2006

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    , author Huang, Z

    author Zhang, X. , author Huang, Z. , author Li, Q. , author Wang, R. , author Zhou, B. , year 2024 . title Legged robot-aided 3d tunnel mapping via residual compensation and anomaly detection . journal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing volume 214 , pages 33--47

    2024

  2. [10]

    , author Bernreiter, L

    author Ebadi, K. , author Bernreiter, L. , author Biggie, H. , author Catt, G. , author Chang, Y. , author Chatterjee, A. , author Denniston, C.E. , author Desch \^e nes, S.P. , author Harlow, K. , author Khattak, S. , et al., year 2023 . title Present and future of slam in ex...

    2023

  3. [11]

    , author Wu, W

    author Li, J. , author Wu, W. , author Yang, B. , author Zou, X. , author Yang, Y. , author Zhao, X. , author Dong, Z. , year 2023 . title Whu-helmet: A helmet-based multi-sensor slam dataset for the evaluation of real-time 3d mapping in large-scale gnss-denied environments . ...

    2023

  4. [12]

    , author Dong, Z

    author Yang, B. , author Dong, Z. , author Liang, F. , author Mi, X. , year 2024 . title Ubiquitous Point Cloud: Theory, Model, and Applications . publisher CRC Press

    2024

  5. [13]

    , author Kr \"o mker, S

    author Hoppe, C. , author Kr \"o mker, S. , year 2009 . title Adaptive meshing and detail-reduction of 3d-point clouds from laser scans . journal International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences volume 38

    2009

  6. [14]

    , author Zhou, L

    author Cui, L. , author Zhou, L. , author Xie, Q. , author Liu, J. , author Han, B. , author Zhang, T. , author Luo, H. , year 2023 . title Direct generation of finite element mesh using 3d laser point cloud , in: booktitle Structures , organization Elsevier . pp. pages 1579--1594

    2023

  7. [15]

    , author Laupheimer, D

    author K \"o lle, M. , author Laupheimer, D. , author Schmohl, S. , author Haala, N. , author Rottensteiner, F. , author Wegner, J.D. , author Ledoux, H. , year 2021 . title The hessigheim 3d (h3d) benchmark on semantic segmentation of high-resolution 3d point clouds and textu...

    2021

  8. [16]

    , author Wen, Y

    author Huang, Z. , author Wen, Y. , author Wang, Z. , author Ren, J. , author Jia, K. , year 2024 . title Surface reconstruction from point clouds: A survey and a benchmark . journal IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence

    2024

  9. [17]

    , author Yuan, C

    author Lin, J. , author Yuan, C. , author Cai, Y. , author Li, H. , author Ren, Y. , author Zou, Y. , author Hong, X. , author Zhang, F. , year 2023 . title Immesh: An immediate lidar localization and meshing framework . journal IEEE Transactions on Robotics volume 39 , pages ...

    2023

  10. [18]

    , author Li, B

    author Ruan, J. , author Li, B. , author Wang, Y. , author Sun, Y. , year 2023 . title Slamesh: Real-time lidar simultaneous localization and meshing , in: booktitle 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , organization IEEE . pp. pages 3546--3552

    2023

  11. [19]

    , author Novello, T

    author Schirmer, L. , author Novello, T. , author da Silva, V. , author Schardong, G. , author Perazzo, D. , author Lopes, H. , author Gon c alves, N. , author Velho, L. , year 2024 . title Geometric implicit neural representations for signed distance functions . journal Compu...

    2024

  12. [20]

    , author Pan, Y

    author Zhong, X. , author Pan, Y. , author Behley, J. , author Stachniss, C. , year 2023 . title Shine-mapping: Large-scale 3d mapping using sparse hierarchical implicit neural representations , in: booktitle 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)...

    2023

  13. [21]

    , author Guadagnino, T

    author Wiesmann, L. , author Guadagnino, T. , author Vizzo, I. , author Zimmerman, N. , author Pan, Y. , author Kuang, H. , author Behley, J. , author Stachniss, C. , year 2023 . title Locndf: Neural distance field mapping for robot localization . journal IEEE Robotics and Aut...

    2023

  14. [22]

    , author Mittleman, J

    author Bernardini, F. , author Mittleman, J. , author Rushmeier, H. , author Silva, C. , author Taubin, G. , year 2002 . title The ball-pivoting algorithm for surface reconstruction . journal IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics volume 5 , pages 349--359

    2002

  15. [23]

    , author Bolitho, M

    author Kazhdan, M. , author Bolitho, M. , author Hoppe, H. , year 2006 . title Poisson surface reconstruction , in: booktitle Proceedings of the fourth Eurographics symposium on Geometry processing

    2006

  16. [24]

    , author Atienza, R

    author Daroya, R. , author Atienza, R. , author Cajote, R. , year 2020 . title Rein: Flexible mesh generation from point clouds , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , pp. pages 352--353

    2020

  17. [25]

    , author Chang, Y

    author Ebadi, K. , author Chang, Y. , author Palieri, M. , author Stephens, A. , author Hatteland, A. , author Heiden, E. , author Thakur, A. , author Funabiki, N. , author Morrell, B. , author Wood, S. , et al., year 2020 . title Lamp: Large-scale autonomous mapping and posit...

    2020

  18. [26]

    , author Tian, B

    author Wang, J. , author Tian, B. , author Zhang, R. , author Chen, L. , year 2022 . title Ulsm: Underground localization and semantic mapping with salient region loop closure under perceptually-degraded environment , in: booktitle 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Int...

    2022

  19. [27]

    , author Kasza, D

    author Tryba a, P. , author Kasza, D. , author Wajs, J. , author Remondino, F. , year 2023 . title Comparison of low-cost handheld lidar-based slam systems for mapping underground tunnels . journal The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial In...

    2023

  20. [28]

    , author Srinivasan, P.P

    author Mildenhall, B. , author Srinivasan, P.P. , author Tancik, M. , author Barron, J.T. , author Ramamoorthi, R. , author Ng, R. , year 2021 . title Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis . journal Communications of the ACM volume 65 , pages 99--106

    2021

  21. [29]

    , author Florence, P

    author Park, J.J. , author Florence, P. , author Straub, J. , author Newcombe, R. , author Lovegrove, S. , year 2019 . title Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer visio...

    2019

  22. [30]

    , author Alldieck, T

    author Chibane, J. , author Alldieck, T. , author Pons-Moll, G. , year 2020 . title Implicit functions in feature space for 3d shape reconstruction and completion , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 6970--6981

    2020

  23. [31]

    , author Oechsle, M

    author Mescheder, L. , author Oechsle, M. , author Niemeyer, M. , author Nowozin, S. , author Geiger, A. , year 2019 . title Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern r...

    2019

  24. [32]

    , author Cline, H.E

    author Lorensen, W.E. , author Cline, H.E. , year 1998 . title Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm , in: booktitle Seminal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field , pp. pages 347--353

    1998

  25. [33]

    , author Liu, S

    author Sucar, E. , author Liu, S. , author Ortiz, J. , author Davison, A.J. , year 2021 . title imap: Implicit mapping and positioning in real-time , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pp. pages 6229--6238

    2021

  26. [34]

    , author Peng, S

    author Zhu, Z. , author Peng, S. , author Larsson, V. , author Xu, W. , author Bao, H. , author Cui, Z. , author Oswald, M.R. , author Pollefeys, M. , year 2022 . title Nice-slam: Neural implicit scalable encoding for slam , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference...

    2022

  27. [35]

    , author Li, H

    author Yang, X. , author Li, H. , author Zhai, H. , author Ming, Y. , author Liu, Y. , author Zhang, G. , year 2022 . title Vox-fusion: Dense tracking and mapping with voxel-based neural implicit representation , in: booktitle 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Aug...

    2022

  28. [36]

    , author Tosi, F

    author Zhang, Y. , author Tosi, F. , author Mattoccia, S. , author Poggi, M. , year 2023 . title Go-slam: Global optimization for consistent 3d instant reconstruction , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. pages 3727--3737

    2023

  29. [37]

    , author Li, Y

    author Sandstr \"o m, E. , author Li, Y. , author Van Gool, L. , author Oswald, M.R. , year 2023 . title Point-slam: Dense neural point cloud-based slam , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. pages 18433--18444

    2023

  30. [38]

    , author Wu, Q

    author Deng, J. , author Wu, Q. , author Chen, X. , author Xia, S. , author Sun, Z. , author Liu, G. , author Yu, W. , author Pei, L. , year 2023 . title Nerf-loam: Neural implicit representation for large-scale incremental lidar odometry and mapping , in: booktitle Proceeding...

    2023

  31. [39]

    , author Kung, P.C

    author Isaacson, S. , author Kung, P.C. , author Ramanagopal, M. , author Vasudevan, R. , author Skinner, K.A. , year 2023 . title Loner: Lidar only neural representations for real-time slam . journal IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    2023

  32. [40]

    , author Evans, A

    author Muller, T. , author Evans, A. , author Schied, C. , author Keller, A. , year 2022 . title Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding . journal ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) volume 41 , pages 1--15

    2022

  33. [41]

    , author Zhong, X

    author Pan, Y. , author Zhong, X. , author Wiesmann, L. , author Posewsky, T. , author Behley, J. , author Stachniss, C. , year 2024 . title Pin-slam: Lidar slam using a point-based implicit neural representation for achieving global map consistency . journal arXiv preprint ar...

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    , author Li, J

    author Zhang, Y. , author Li, J. , author Zhao, X. , author Liao, Y. , author Dong, Z. , author Yang, B. , year 2024 . title Nerf-based localization and meshing with wearable laser scanning system: A case study in underground environment . journal ISPRS Annals of the Photogram...

    2024

  35. [43]

    , author Zhong, Y

    author Liu, Y. , author Zhong, Y. , author Shi, S. , author Zhang, L. , year 2024 . title Scale-aware deep reinforcement learning for high resolution remote sensing imagery classification . journal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing volume 209 , pages 296--311

    2024

  36. [44]

    , author Zhang, W

    author Wang, H. , author Zhang, W. , author Ren, P. , year 2024 . title Self-organized underwater image enhancement . journal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing volume 215 , pages 1--14

    2024

  37. [45]

    , author Cioffi, G

    author Messikommer, N. , author Cioffi, G. , author Gehrig, M. , author Scaramuzza, D. , year 2024 . title Reinforcement learning meets visual odometry , in: booktitle European Conference on Computer Vision , organization Springer . pp. pages 76--92

    2024

  38. [46]

    , author Xu, X

    author Cao, M. , author Xu, X. , author Yang, Y. , author Li, J. , author Jin, T. , author Wang, P. , author Hung, T.Y. , author Lin, G. , author Xie, L. , year 2024 . title Learning dynamic weight adjustment for spatial-temporal trajectory planning in crowd navigation . journ...

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    , author Zhao, J

    author Song, S. , author Zhao, J. , author Huang, K. , author Lin, J. , author Ye, C. , author Feng, T. , year 2024 . title N3-mapping: Normal guided neural non-projective signed distance fields for large-scale 3d mapping . journal IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    2024

  40. [48]

    , author Niu, H

    author Hu, J. , author Niu, H. , author Carrasco, J. , author Lennox, B. , author Arvin, F. , year 2020 . title Voronoi-based multi-robot autonomous exploration in unknown environments via deep reinforcement learning . journal IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology volume 6...

    2020

  41. [49]

    , year 2017

    author Li, Y. , year 2017 . title Deep reinforcement learning: An overview . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    , author Wolski, F

    author Schulman, J. , author Wolski, F. , author Dhariwal, P. , author Radford, A. , author Klimov, O. , year 2017 . title Proximal policy optimization algorithms . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    , author McKay, N.D

    author Besl, P.J. , author McKay, N.D. , year 1992 . title Method for registration of 3-d shapes , in: booktitle Sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures , organization Spie . pp. pages 586--606

    1992

  44. [52]

    , author Contributors, G

    author Dellaert, F. , author Contributors, G. , year 2022 . title borglab/gtsam . https://github.com/borglab/gtsam), :10.5281/zenodo.5794541

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    , author Ratajczak, W

    author Ma \'c kiewicz, A. , author Ratajczak, W. , year 1993 . title Principal components analysis (pca) . journal Computers & Geosciences volume 19 , pages 303--342

    1993

  46. [54]

    , author Nguyen, T.M

    author Li, J. , author Nguyen, T.M. , author Yuan, S. , author Xie, L. , year 2024 . title Pss-ba: Lidar bundle adjustment with progressive spatial smoothing , in: booktitle 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , organization IEEE . p...

    2024

  47. [55]

    , author Liu, X

    author Kong, F. , author Liu, X. , author Tang, B. , author Lin, J. , author Ren, Y. , author Cai, Y. , author Zhu, F. , author Chen, N. , author Zhang, F. , year 2023 . title Marsim: A light-weight point-realistic simulator for lidar-based uavs . journal IEEE Robotics and Aut...

    2023

  48. [56]

    https://www.livoxtech.com/mid-360

    author Livox , year 2025 . https://www.livoxtech.com/mid-360. note accessed: 2025-3-21

    2025

  49. [57]

    , author Cho, Y

    author Jeong, J. , author Cho, Y. , author Shin, Y.S. , author Roh, H. , author Kim, A. , year 2019 . title Complex urban dataset with multi-level sensors from highly diverse urban environments . journal The International Journal of Robotics Research volume 38 , pages 642--657

    2019

  50. [58]

    https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware

    author Autoware , year 2022 . https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware

    2022

  51. [59]

    , author Zhang, N

    author Zhang, J.X. , author Zhang, N. , author Xu, Y.S. , year 2022 . title Data on point cloud scanning and ground radar of composite lining in jointly constructed tunnel . journal Data in brief volume 41 , pages 107993

    2022

  52. [60]

    , author Kr \'a tk \`y , V

    author Petr \'a c ek, P. , author Kr \'a tk \`y , V. , author Petrl \' k, M. , author B \'a c a, T. , author Kratochv \' l, R. , author Saska, M. , year 2021 . title Large-scale exploration of cave environments by unmanned aerial vehicles . journal IEEE Robotics and Automation...

    2021

  53. [61]

    , year 2024

    author Team, V. , year 2024 . https://github.com/VCityTeam/TT-Rib. note accessed: 2025-3-21

    2024

  54. [62]

    , author Hill, A

    author Raffin, A. , author Hill, A. , author Gleave, A. , author Kanervisto, A. , author Ernestus, M. , author Dormann, N. , year 2021 . title Stable-baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations . journal Journal of machine learning research volume 22 , pages 1--8

    2021

  55. [63]

    , author Xu, X

    author Li, J. , author Xu, X. , author Liu, J. , author Cao, K. , author Yuan, S. , author Xie, L. , year 2025 . title Ua-mpc: Uncertainty-aware model predictive control for motorized lidar odometry . journal IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    2025

  56. [64]

    , author Zhu, H

    author Zhao, S. , author Zhu, H. , author Gao, Y. , author Kim, B. , author Qiu, Y. , author Johnson, A.M. , author Scherer, S. , year 2024 . title Superloc: The key to robust lidar-inertial localization lies in predicting alignment risks . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02901

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.