Resonances and computations

Fr\'ed\'eric Rousset; Katharina Schratz; Yvain Bruned

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 71 references

Resonances and computations

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The review argues that resonance-based integrators, which embed the nonlinear frequency interactions of a dispersive PDE into the discretisation, reliably approximate solutions from much rougher initial data than splitting and exponential…

desk verdict A readable survey of the authors' resonance-based integrators; the advertised low-regularity convergence, however, is proven only for filtered variants, not the displayed schemes. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19647 v1 pith:QDKNJ5WU submitted 2025-04-28 math.NA cs.NAmath.APmath.RA

Yvain Bruned , Frédéric Rousset , Katharina Schratz This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NAcs.NAmath.APmath.RA MSC 65M1565M7035Q53

keywords resonance-basedintegratorslowregularitydispersivepartialdifferentialequationsKorteweg-deVriesequationdecoratedtreesDuhameliterationdiscreteBourgainspacesstructure-preservingschemes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out a programme for numerical time integration of nonlinear dispersive PDEs that keeps working when the initial data are far less smooth than classical methods require. The central proposal is to build the scheme on the equation's resonance structure: iterate Duhamel's formula, identify the dominant oscillatory phase in each term, integrate that phase exactly, and treat the remaining lower-order part as the only source of derivative loss. The authors show, for periodic KdV as the model case, that this changes the regularity needed for first-order convergence from five derivatives for Strang splitting or three for exponential integrators down to two, and they survey the decorated-tree formalism that organises the same resonance analysis to arbitrary order. If the programme succeeds, reliable numerical approximation extends to much rougher data across nonlinear dispersive equations, not just KdV.

What carries the argument

The machine that carries the argument is a decorated tree series: each tree encodes one iterated Duhamel integral, with frequencies decorating the edges and nodes, together with the associated elementary differential in the initial data and a symmetry factor. The decisive algebraic input is the resonance decomposition of the dispersion relation, $L = L_{\mathrm{dom}} + L_{\mathrm{low}}$, where $L_{\mathrm{dom}}$ is exactly integrable; for KdV, $L_{\mathrm{low}} = 3k_1 k_2 (k_1+k_2)$ via the factorisation identity, and for NLS, $L_{\mathrm{dom}} = 2k_1^2$ with $L_{\mathrm{low}}$ the remainder. A coproduct on decorated trees, defined by admissible cuts, organises the calculation of $L_{\mathrm{low}}$ for each tree and leads to a Birkhoff-type factorisation of the discretisation map, which is how schemes of arbitrary order are constructed in a systematic way. For the error analysis, the paper introduces a frequency cutoff $\Pi_\tau$ projecting onto $|k| \leq \tau^{-1/3}$, so that discrete Bourgain-type spaces reproduce the frequency interactions of the continuous problem, and it surveys the discrete bilinear estimates that convert the local error into global $L^2$ convergence.

What would settle it

Run the resonance-based first-order scheme (28) on periodic KdV with initial data in $H^s$ for $s$ between $-1$ and $0$, comparing the $L^2$ error at a fixed time against a highly resolved spectral solution; if the error fails to decay at the predicted order in $\tau$ as $\tau \to 0$, the low-regularity guarantee collapses. Alternatively, replace the KdV dispersion $k^3$ by $k^4$, so that $k^4 - k_1^4 - k_2^4$ does not factor into linear terms, and check whether the first Duhamel iterate can still be integrated exactly; failure of that factorisation would mark the boundary of the method's range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core discovery is that the obstacle to rough-data approximation is not the oscillation itself but the way classical schemes linearise it. For KdV, the identity $k^3 - k_1^3 - k_2^3 = 3k_1 k_2 (k_1+k_2)$ turns the phase in the first Duhamel iterate into a product that can be integrated exactly and written back in physical space using only inverse derivatives. The same structural splitting, $L = L_{\mathrm{dom}} + L_{\mathrm{low}}$ with $L_{\mathrm{dom}}$ exactly integrable and expressible by ordinary differential operators, is claimed to hold for a wide class of dispersive equations, including cubic NLS where $L_{\mathrm{dom}} \neq 0$ and must be integrated exactly while $L_{\mathrm{low}}$ is Taylor expanded. The paper argues that with a decorated-tree series tracking frequencies and iterated integrals, this resonance analysis extends to arbitrarily high order, producing schemes whose local error is controlled by powers of the low part $L_{\mathrm{low}}$ rather than the full dispersion operator $L$.

Load-bearing premise

The advertised gains stand on two pillars: the equation's frequency law must split into an exactly integrable dominant part and a milder remainder, and the error analysis needs a discrete bilinear estimate together with a frequency cutoff; the first is verified for KdV and NLS, the second is quoted from earlier papers rather than proved here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For periodic KdV, the first-order resonance scheme (28) has local error $O(\tau^2 \partial_x^2 u)$ and the second-order scheme (29) has $O(\tau^3 \partial_x^4 u)$, compared with the five and six additional derivatives demanded respectively by Strang splitting and second-order exponential integrators.
The same resonance analysis applies to cubic NLS with a nonzero dominant part $L_{\mathrm{dom}} = 2k_1^2$, giving schemes that combine exact integration of the dominant phase with Taylor expansion of the lower part.
Symmetric, time-reversible low-regularity schemes such as the midpoint variants (30) can be derived by choosing symmetric Duhamel iterations and interpolation points, preserving the symmetries of the continuous problem at the discrete level.
With the frequency cutoff $|k| \leq \tau^{-1/3}$, the filtered scheme can be analysed in discrete Bourgain-type spaces, yielding $L^2$ error estimates at low regularity for KdV, as surveyed in Section 4.
The decorated-tree formalism with its coproduct gives a recursive formula for the regularity-embedding operator appearing in the local error, so higher-order resonance-based schemes can be built without hand computation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the decisive step is algebraic, one testable extension is to search for other dispersive equations whose frequency-interaction polynomials factor into linear terms; for those, the same exact-integration trick should lower the regularity requirement without changing the decorated-tree machinery.
The role of the cutoff suggests a practical tuning knob: choosing the Fourier cutoff as a function of the actual regularity of the data, rather than fixing it at $\tau^{-1/3}$, might allow adaptive schemes that degrade gracefully as the data become rougher, a direction the review does not pursue.
The Hopf-algebraic formulation implies that the resonance-based schemes could be combined with renormalisation-type procedures, which is where structure preservation (symmetry and ultimately symplecticity in higher dimensions) would most plausibly be achieved; the paper notes that symplectic low-regularity schemes in dimension greater than one remain open.
A numerical experiment comparing the filtered resonance scheme against a spectral reference for KdV at Sobolev exponents below zero would directly test how far the low-regularity claim extends past the $H^s$, $s>0$ regime covered by the $L^2$ analysis; the paper's formalism suggests the method may still behave, but the review does not claim this.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a review of the authors' own resonance-based low-regularity integrator program, not a new result. It is a good review: the decorated tree formalism is explained more concretely than in the original papers, the KdV/NLS examples are worked through in enough detail to see where the derivative savings come from, and the comparison with splitting and exponential integrators is fair and well-motivated. If you want a single entry point to that literature, this serves.

The soft spot is real and worth naming. The convergence analysis in Section 4 is explicitly for a filtered version of the scheme, with a frequency projection |k| ≤ τ^{-1/3} inserted (Remark 2, Eq. (47)). The schemes displayed in Corollaries 1 and 2, equations (28)–(30), have no such projection. The paper says at the end of Section 4 that the analysis concerns 'a filtered version of (30)', but the abstract and Section 2.3 advertise the method without that qualification. So there is a gap between what is promised ('very rough data') and what is proved for the displayed schemes. This matters because the discrete Bourgain estimate (47) and the exact factorization (20) are used after the cutoff; on a periodic grid of size τ the unfiltered discrete dispersion relation has spurious interactions that the estimate does not control. The gap is not fatal for a review—the original papers presumably close it—but the review should be explicit that the rigorous low-regularity theorem covers only the filtered variants.

Two minor things: the paper leans heavily on the authors' own prior work for the key theorems (Theorem 1 is quoted, not proved), which is fine for a survey but limits standalone value; and the positive-regularity hypothesis in the L2 analysis sits awkwardly with the 'very rough' framing, though the paper does state it.

Bottom line: publishable as a survey after a minor revision that adds a clear scope statement. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. I would not cite it in my own work—I'd cite the original papers—but I'd point students to it.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This survey-style paper advertises a class of resonance-based integrators for nonlinear dispersive PDEs, with periodic KdV as the running example. It contrasts the regularity requirements of splitting and exponential integrators with the new schemes, derives first- and second-order resonance-based schemes via a decorated-tree formalism, presents an implicit symmetric variant, and sketches an L2 error analysis at low regularity using discrete Bourgain spaces. The central claim is that embedding the nonlinear frequency interactions into the discretisation yields reliable approximation for much rougher data than classical methods can handle.

Significance. If the advertised low-regularity convergence were established for the schemes as displayed, this would be a valuable contribution: it would extend rigorous numerical approximation of dispersive PDEs below the regularity thresholds of splitting and exponential integrators, and the decorated-tree formalism offers a systematic route to higher-order and structure-preserving variants. The paper is clearly written, gives explicit schemes, and is honest that the deeper analytic estimates and the general local-error theorem are imported from earlier papers ([14, 61, 66]). However, the paper's own Remark 2 states that a frequency cutoff is needed for the discrete Bourgain analysis, and the convergence theory in Section 4 is explicitly carried out only for a filtered version of the scheme, while the schemes displayed in Section 3 contain no such cutoff. As it stands, the low-regularity claim is therefore proved only for filtered variants, not for the methods as written.

major comments (2)

[Section 3, Corollaries 1–2 (Eqs. (28)–(30)) and Section 4, Remark 2 (Eqs. (47)–(48))] The low-regularity L2 convergence analysis in Section 4 is performed only for a 'filtered version of (30)' with the sharp frequency projection Π_τ onto |k| ≤ τ^{-1/3}, and Remark 2 states that this cutoff is 'crucial in our estimates'. The schemes displayed in Corollaries 1 and 2 contain no such projection. Consequently, the discrete Bourgain bilinear estimate (47) and the factorisation (20) do not apply to the methods as presented, and the abstract and Section 2.3 overstate what is proved: the advertised rough-data reliability is established only for the filtered variants. Please either add the cutoff to the displayed schemes or explicitly qualify the abstract and Section 2.3 so that the low-regularity convergence claim is restricted to the filtered schemes, with the unfiltered Corollaries presented as formal local-error constructions.
[Section 3, Corollary 1 (Eq. (29)) and Section 4, Eq. (47)] The second-order scheme (29) contains a smooth filter Ψ satisfying |τ Ψ(iτ∂_x^2)∂_x^2| ≤ 1, but this is not the sharp projection Π_τ used in the discrete Bourgain estimate (47). If the intended interpretation is that Ψ is a regularisation that can replace Π_τ, the equivalence is not shown; if not, the L2 convergence theory does not cover (29). This distinction should be made explicit, and the role of the filter in the proof should be clarified.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] There is a typo: 'inpiration' should be 'inspiration'.
[Section 2.1] There are typos: 'separetely' should be 'separately' and 'symetrised' should be 'symmetrised'.
[Section 3] There are typos: 'Unfortunatly' should be 'Unfortunately', 'descritisation' should be 'discretisation', and 'teh context' should be 'the context'.
[Section 4] The phrase 'Lady Windamere's fan argument' should be 'Lady Windermere's fan argument'.
[References] There are duplicate entries in the reference list: '[37, 37]' appears in the introduction and '[66, 66]' appears near the end of Section 4; please deduplicate.
[Section 3, Corollary 1] The filter function Ψ is introduced with a norm condition ‖τΨ(iτ∂_x^2)∂_x^2‖_F ≤ 1, but the space/norm denoted by F is not defined; please clarify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No demonstrable circularity: the resonance reduction is an explicit algebraic identity and the error analysis cites prior published proofs rather than the target claim.

full rationale

The paper is a review of the authors' own resonance-based integrator program, and it is heavily self-cited, but none of its central steps reduces to its inputs by construction. The key mechanism for KdV is the explicit algebraic factorization k^3 - k1^3 - k2^3 = 3 k1 k2 (k1+k2), displayed in Eq. (20), which is derived in the text from the Duhamel formulation and is not an input-output tautology. The general local-error result is stated as Theorem 1 and explicitly attributed to prior work [14]; the discrete Bourgain bilinear estimate (47) is attributed to [61, 66]. These are self-citations, but they refer to externally published, peer-reviewed proofs and are not presented as consequences of the current paper's conclusion. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives; and the decorated-tree formalism is presented as a bookkeeping device, not as a substitute for proof. A genuine caveat exists: Section 4 analyzes a filtered version of the scheme (Remark 2, Eq. (47)), while Corollaries 1 and 2 display unfiltered schemes, so the low-regularity convergence proof does not directly cover the displayed schemes as written. That is a rigor/scope gap, not circularity. The modest score of 2 reflects only the self-citation-heavy survey format, not any identified circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the two entries listed are design choices within the schemes. The axioms are the standard PDE well-posedness background plus the specific algebraic and analytic conditions that make the resonance approach work. No new physical entities are introduced; the decorated tree formalism is a mathematical tool, not a postulated entity.

free parameters (2)

Filter function Ψ = unspecified; any filter with Ψ(0)=1 and ||τ Ψ(iτ ∂_x^2) ∂_x^2|| ≤ 1
Appears in the second-order KdV scheme (Eq. 29). It is a design choice that does not affect the local error order, only the stability constant.
Frequency cutoff exponent = τ^{-1/3}
The cutoff |k| ≤ τ^{-1/3} in Π_τ (Remark 2, Eq. 47) is a specific technical choice for the discrete Bourgain analysis; other choices might work but the paper fixes this one.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The iterated Duhamel expansion is encoded in a convergent decorated tree series with truncation error O(t^{F+1}) (Eq. 19).
Used throughout Section 3 as the starting point for the resonance analysis; the convergence and error order are proved in the authors' prior work [14], not reproduced here.
standard math The dispersion relation for KdV satisfies the factorization k^3 - k1^3 - k2^3 = 3 k1 k2 (k1+k2) (Eq. 20).
This algebraic identity is used to compute the first iterated integral exactly and is the reason KdV gains two derivatives over classical schemes.
ad hoc to paper The operator L admits a decomposition L = L_dom + L_low with L_dom of a form that can be mapped back to physical space (Eq. 22 and discussion).
This is the central structural assumption of the resonance method; it holds for KdV and NLS but the paper notes it is not universal for all dispersive equations.
domain assumption The discrete Bourgain spaces satisfy Lemma 1, Lemma 2 and the bilinear estimate (47) uniformly in τ.
These estimates are the backbone of the L2 convergence analysis in Section 4; they are quoted from [61, 66] without proof.
ad hoc to paper The frequency cutoff Π_τ at |k| ≤ τ^{-1/3} does not alter the resonance structure and enables the discrete Bourgain estimates (Remark 2).
This is a technical device introduced for the analysis; it is asserted that it does not change the resonance analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonances and computations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDKNJ5WU

@misc{pith2026250419647,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonances and computations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDKNJ5WU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19647}
}

read the original abstract

The computation of time dynamics arising in nonlinear time-dependent partial differential equations is an ongoing challenge in numerical analysis, especially once roughness comes into play. Classical numerical schemes in general fail to resolve the oscillatory behaviour in the solution which leads to numerical instabilities and loss of convergence. Dispersive equations, e.g., nonlinear Schr\"odinger, Korteweg--de Vries and wave equations, thereby pose in particular a big problem as in contrast to the parabolic setting, no strong smoothing can be expected, i.e., if the initial data is rough, the solution stays rough which makes their approximation a delicate task. In this review we give an overview on a new numerical ansatz which aims to tackle the time dynamics of nonlinear dispersive partial differential equations even for very rough data. This is achieved by a resonance analysis and decorated tree formalism that draws its inpiration from the combinatorics used in the theory of regularity structures for solving singular SPDEs. One can hope to see this formalism applied in other contexts for dispersive PDEs and beyond.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

[1]

Berrut, L.N

J-P . Berrut, L.N. Trefethen, Barycentric Lagrange Interpolation. SIAM Review 46 (2004)

work page 2004
[2]

Bernier, B

J. Bernier, B. Gr ´ebert, Long Time Dynamics for Generalized Korteweg–de Vries and Be n- jamin–Ono Equations. Arch Rational Mech Anal 241:1139–1241 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, K. Schratz. Low regularity integrators via decorated trees. arXiv:2202.01171

arXiv
[4]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, G. Maierhofer, K. Schratz. Symmetric resonance based integrators and forest formulae. arXiv:2305.16737

arXiv
[5]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, K. Schratz. Approximations of Dispersive PDEs in the Presence of Low-Regularity Randomness. Found. Comput. Math. 24, (2024), 1819–1869

work page 2024
[6]

Armstrong-Goodall, Y

J. Armstrong-Goodall, Y . Bruned. Resonance based schemes for SPDEs. arXiv:2312.16690

arXiv
[7]

Low regularity symplectic schemes for stochastic NLS

J. Armstrong-Goodall, Y . Bruned. Low regularity symplectic schemes for stochastic NLS. arXiv:2410.22359

work page Pith review arXiv
[8]

Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain latti ce subsets and appli- cations to nonlinear evolution equations

J. Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain latti ce subsets and appli- cations to nonlinear evolution equations. Part II: The KDV E quation. Geom. Funct. Anal. 3:209–262 (1993)

work page 1993

Show all 71 references

[9]

Bruned, A

Y . Bruned, A. Chandra, I. Chevyrev, M. Hairer, Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 23, no. 3, (2021), 869-947

2021
[10]

Bringmann Y

B. Bringmann Y . Deng, A. Nahmod, H. Yue . Invariant Gibbs measures for the three dimen- sional cubic nonlinear wave equation . Invent. Math. 236, (2024), 1133–1411

2024
[11]

Bruned, M

Y . Bruned, M. Hairer, L. Zambotti, Algebraic renormalisation of regularity structures. Invent. Math. 215, no. 3, (2019), 1039–1156

2019
[12]

Y . Bruned. Composition and substitution of Regularity Structures B-series . arXiv:2310.14242

arXiv
[13]

Y . Bruned. Derivation of normal forms for dispersive PDEs via arboriﬁc ation . arXiv:2409.03642

arXiv
[14]

Bruned, K

Y . Bruned, K. Schratz. Resonance based schemes for dispersive equations via decorated trees. Forum of Mathematics, Pi, 10, E2
[15]

Bruned, L

Y . Bruned, L. Tolomeo. Cancellations for dispersive PDEs with random initial data . arXiv:2412.17051

arXiv
[16]

J. C. Butcher, An algebraic theory of integration methods. Math. Comp. 26, (1972), 79–106

1972
[17]

Celledoni, D

E. Celledoni, D. Cohen, B. Owren, Symmetric exponential integrators with an application to the cubic Schr ¨odinger equation. Found. Comput. Math. 8, (2008), 303–317

2008
[18]

Christ, Power series solution of a nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation

M. Christ, Power series solution of a nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation. In Mathematical aspects of nonlinear dispersive equations, volume 163 of Ann. of Math. Stud., pages 131–155. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007

2007
[19]

Chartier, E

P . Chartier, E. Hairer, G. Vilmart, Algebraic structures of B-series. Found. Comput. Math. 10, no. 4, (2010), 407–427

2010
[20]

Colliander, M

J. Colliander, M. Keel, G. Staﬃlani, H. Takaoka and T. Tao . Sharp global well-posedness for KdV and modiﬁed KdV on R and T. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 3, 705–749

2003
[21]

Connes, D

A. Connes, D. Kreimer, Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geomet ry. Comm. Math. Phys. 199, no. 1, (1998), 203–242

1998
[22]

Connes, D

A. Connes, D. Kreimer, Renormalization in quantum ﬁeld theory and the Riemann-Hil bert problem I: the Hopf algebra structure of graphs and the main t heorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 210, (2000), 249–73

2000
[23]

Y . Deng, Z. Hani. Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation . Invent. math. 233, (2023), 543-724

2023
[24]

Y . Deng, Z. Hani. Derivation of the wave kinetic equation: Full range of scali ng laws . arXiv:2301.07063

arXiv
[25]

Deng, A.R

Y . Deng, A.R. Nahmod, H. Yue. Random tensors, propagation of randomness, and nonlinear dispersive equations. Invent. math. 228, (2022), 539–686

2022
[26]

Ecalle Les fonctions r ´esurgentes

J. Ecalle Les fonctions r ´esurgentes. Tome I, II and III [Mathematical Publications of Orsay 81 and 85]. Universit´e de Paris-Sud, D ´epartement de Math ´ematique, Orsay, 1981 and 1985. 24 Yvain Bruned, Fr ´ed´eric Rousset, and Katharina Schratz

1981
[27]

Ecalle Singularit´es non abordables par la g ´eom´etrie

J. Ecalle Singularit´es non abordables par la g ´eom´etrie. (French) [Singularities that are inac- cessible by geometry] Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 42 (199 2), no. 1-2, 73–164
[28]

Ecalle, B

J. Ecalle, B. Vallet. The arboriﬁcation-coarboriﬁcation transform: analytic, combinatorial, and algebraic aspects. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse (6) 13, no. 3, (2004), 575–657

2004
[29]

Engquist, A

B. Engquist, A. Fokas, E. Hairer, A. Iserles, Highly Oscillatory Problems. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2009

2009
[30]

Fauvet and F

F. Fauvet and F. Menous, Ecalle’s arboriﬁcation coarboriﬁcation transforms and Co nnes Kreimer Hopf algebra, Annales Sc. de l’Ecole Normale Sup. 50, no. 1, (2017), 39-83

2017
[31]

Faou, Geometric Numerical Integration and Schr ¨odinger Equations

E. Faou, Geometric Numerical Integration and Schr ¨odinger Equations. European Math. Soc. Publishing House, Z¨ urich 2012

2012
[32]

Z. Guo, S. Kwon, T. Oh, Poincar´e-Dulac normal form reduction for unconditional well- posedness of the periodic cubic NLS , Comm. Math. Phys. 322, no. 1, (2013), 19–48

2013
[33]

Gubinelli, Controlling rough paths

M. Gubinelli, Controlling rough paths. J. Funct. Anal. 216, no. 1, (2004), 86–140

2004
[34]

Gubinelli, Ramiﬁcation of rough paths

M. Gubinelli, Ramiﬁcation of rough paths. J. Diﬀer. Equ. 248, no. 4, (2010), 693 – 721

2010
[35]

Gubinelli, Rough solutions for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation

M. Gubinelli, Rough solutions for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 11, no. 4, (2012), 709–733

2012
[36]

Hairer, A theory of regularity structures

M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures. Invent. Math. 198, no. 2, (2014), 269–504

2014
[37]

Hairer, C

E. Hairer, C. Lubich, G. Wanner, Geometric numerical integration. Structure-preserving a l- gorithms for ordinary diﬀerential equations. second ed., vol. 31 of Springer Series in Compu- tational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006

2006
[38]

Holden, K

H. Holden, K. H. Karlsen, N. H. Risebro, T. Tao, Operator splitting methods for the Korteweg- de Vries equation. Math. Comp. 80, (2011), 821–846

2011
[39]

Holden, K

H. Holden, K. H. Karlsen, K.-A. Lie, N. H. Risebro, Splitting for Partial Diﬀerential Equations with Rough Solutions. European Math. Soc. Publishing House, Z¨ urich, 2010

2010
[40]

Holden, C

H. Holden, C. Lubich, N. H. Risebro, Operator splitting for partial diﬀerential equations with Burgers nonlinearity. Math. Comp. 82:173–185 (2012)

2012
[41]

Hochbruck, J

M. Hochbruck, J. Leibold, A. Ostermann, On the convergence of Lawson methods for semilinear stiﬀ problems. Numer. Math. 145, (2020), 553–580

2020
[42]

Hochbruck, A

M. Hochbruck, A. Ostermann, Exponential integrators. Acta Numer. 19, (2010), 209–286

2010
[43]

Hofmanov ´a, K

M. Hofmanov ´a, K. Schratz, An oscillatory integrator for the KdV equation, Numer. Math. 136, (2017), 1117-1137

2017
[44]

Hundsdorfer, J

W. Hundsdorfer, J. Verwer, Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection- Diﬀusion - Reaction Equations. Springer, Berlin, 2003

2003
[45]

Ignat, E

L. Ignat, E. Zuazua, Numerical dispersive schemes for the nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47, no. 2, (2009), 1366–1390

2009
[46]

Jahnke, C

T. Jahnke, C. Lubich, Error bounds for exponential operator splittings. BIT, 40, (2000), 735– 744

2000
[47]

L. Ji, A. Ostermann, F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Low regularity full error estimates for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 62, (2024), 2071–2086

2024
[48]

Encyclopedia of Applied and Computational Mathematics

S. Jin, Schr¨odinger equation: Computation, Invited contribution to Springer “Encyclopedia of Applied and Computational Mathematics”, ed. by B. Engquist , pp. 1299-1301, 2015

2015
[49]

C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. Vega. A bilinear estimate with applications to the KdV equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), no. 2, 573–603

1996
[50]

Klein, Fourth order time-stepping for low dispersion Korteweg-de Vries and nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation

C. Klein, Fourth order time-stepping for low dispersion Korteweg-de Vries and nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation. ETNA 29, (2008), 116–135. http://eudml.org/doc/117659

2008
[51]

B. Li, S. Ma, K. Schratz, A semi-implicit low-regularity integrator for Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60, (2022), 2273–2292

2022
[52]

Linares, G

F. Linares, G. Ponce, Introduction to Nonlinear Dispersive Equations.Second edition. Springer, New Y ork, 2015

2015
[53]

D. Levy, G. Puppo, G. Russo, Compact central WENO schemes for multidimensional conser- vation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 22:656–672 (2000)

2000
[54]

V .T. Luan, A. Ostermann, Exponential B-series: The stiﬀ case SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51, no. 6, (2013), 3431–3445

2013
[55]

Lubich, On splitting methods for Schr ¨odinger–Poisson and cubic nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equations

C. Lubich, On splitting methods for Schr ¨odinger–Poisson and cubic nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equations. Math. Comp. 77:2141–2153 (2008) Resonances and computations 25

2008
[56]

T. J. Lyons, Diﬀerential equations driven by rough signals. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 14, no. 2, (1998), 215–310

1998
[57]

McLachlan, G.R.W

R.I. McLachlan, G.R.W. Quispel, splitting methods. Acta Numer. 11, (2002), 341–434

2002
[58]

Maierhofer, K

G. Maierhofer, K. Schratz. Bridging the gap/colon.up symplecticity and low regularity in Runge-Kutta resonance-based schemes. arXiv:2205.05024

arXiv
[59]

Murua, J.M

A. Murua, J.M. Sanz-Serna, Word Series for Dynamical Systems and Their Numerical Inte- grators. Found. Comp. Math. 17, (2017), 675–712

2017
[60]

Ostermann, F

A. Ostermann, F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Error estimates of a Fourier integrator for the cubic Schr¨odinger equation at low regularity. Found. Comput. Math. 21, (2021), 725-765

2021
[61]

Ostermann, F

A. Ostermann, F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Fourier integrator for periodic NLS: low regularity estimates via discrete Bourgain spaces. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 25, No. 10, (2023), 3913– 3952

2023
[62]

Ostermann, F

A. Ostermann, F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Error estimates at low regularity of splitting schemes for NLS. Math. Comp. 91 (2021), no. 333, 169–182

2021
[63]

Ostermann, K

A. Ostermann, K. Schratz, Low regularity exponential-type integrators for semiline ar Schr¨odinger equations, Found. Comput. Math. 18, (2018), 731–755

2018
[64]

Ostermann, C

A. Ostermann, C. Su, Two exponential-type integrators for the ”good” Boussines q equation. Numer. Math. 143, (2019), 683–712

2019
[65]

Rousset, K

F. Rousset, K. Schratz, A general framework of low regularity integrators. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59, no. 3, (2021), 1735–1768

2021
[66]

Rousset, K

F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Convergence error estimates at low regularity for time disc retizations of KdV. Pure Appl. Anal. 4 (2022), no. 1, 127–152

2022
[67]

Rousset, K

F. Rousset, K. Schratz, Resonances as a computational tool. Found. Comput. Math. 2024 (online ﬁrst) 10.1007/s10208-024-09665-8

2024 doi
[68]

Sanz-Serna, M.P

J.M. Sanz-Serna, M.P . Calvo, Numerical Hamiltonian Problems. Chapman and Hall, London, 1994

1994
[69]

Schratz, Y

K. Schratz, Y . Wang, X. Zhao, Low-regularity integrators for nonlinear Dirac equations. Math. Comp. 90, (2021), 189-214

2021
[70]

Tao, Nonlinear dispersive equations

T. Tao, Nonlinear dispersive equations. Local and global analysis . Amer. Math. Soc., Provi- dence RI, 2006

2006
[71]

Unterberger

J. Unterberger. H¨older-Continuous Rough Paths by Fourier Normal Ordering. Comm. Math. Phys. 298, (2010), 1–36

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Berrut, L.N

J-P . Berrut, L.N. Trefethen, Barycentric Lagrange Interpolation. SIAM Review 46 (2004)

work page 2004

[2] [2]

Bernier, B

J. Bernier, B. Gr ´ebert, Long Time Dynamics for Generalized Korteweg–de Vries and Be n- jamin–Ono Equations. Arch Rational Mech Anal 241:1139–1241 (2021)

work page 2021

[3] [3]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, K. Schratz. Low regularity integrators via decorated trees. arXiv:2202.01171

arXiv

[4] [4]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, G. Maierhofer, K. Schratz. Symmetric resonance based integrators and forest formulae. arXiv:2305.16737

arXiv

[5] [5]

Alama Bronsard, Y

Y . Alama Bronsard, Y . Bruned, K. Schratz. Approximations of Dispersive PDEs in the Presence of Low-Regularity Randomness. Found. Comput. Math. 24, (2024), 1819–1869

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Armstrong-Goodall, Y

J. Armstrong-Goodall, Y . Bruned. Resonance based schemes for SPDEs. arXiv:2312.16690

arXiv

[7] [7]

Low regularity symplectic schemes for stochastic NLS

J. Armstrong-Goodall, Y . Bruned. Low regularity symplectic schemes for stochastic NLS. arXiv:2410.22359

work page Pith review arXiv

[8] [8]

Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain latti ce subsets and appli- cations to nonlinear evolution equations

J. Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain latti ce subsets and appli- cations to nonlinear evolution equations. Part II: The KDV E quation. Geom. Funct. Anal. 3:209–262 (1993)

work page 1993