Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Efficient quantum state preparation through seniority driven operator selection

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes SURGE-VQE, an ansatz built from paired double and generalized single excitations ordered by one-parameter energy-deviation screening, and claims chemically accurate ground states for stretched small molecules at shallow…

desk verdict SURGE-VQE is a credible compact-ansatz heuristic with honest benchmarks, but the asymptotic O(N^2)-parameter and shallow-depth claim is internally inconsistent and needs to be fixed before the paper's main selling point holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19760 v1 pith:P4XLUQQB submitted 2025-04-28 quant-ph

Dipanjali Halder , Dibyendu Mondal , Rahul Maitra This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords variationalquantumeigensolverunitarycoupledclusterseniority-zeroexcitationsoperatororderingone-parameterprescreeningCNOT-efficientcircuitsstrongcorrelationshallow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper puts forward an ansatz-construction algorithm for near-term quantum chemistry that tries to obtain both accuracy and shallow circuits from the same ingredient: an ordered set of computationally cheap excitations. Working only with generalized single excitations and seniority-preserving paired double excitations, it ranks each operator by the energy it recovers in a one-parameter quantum circuit, first against the Hartree-Fock state and then against each paired reference state. The paper claims this ordering yields a dynamic ansatz with at most $O(N^2)$ parameters and at worst linear gate depth, and it demonstrates chemically accurate potential curves for BH, LiH, and asymmetric BeH$_2$ while using an order of magnitude fewer two-qubit CNOT gates, the dominant source of circuit error, than gradient-based adaptive ansatze. The practical stake is that, if the ordering premise holds, strongly correlated small molecules can be prepared on noisy hardware with far less two-qubit gate error and with pre-circuit measurement overhead that stays at $O(N^4)$ instead of growing with the number of variational parameters.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a two-tier operator pool built on seniority, the number of unpaired electrons in a determinant: seniority-zero paired double excitations $\tau_{2,p}^\alpha$, which move one electron pair from an occupied spatial orbital to a virtual spatial orbital and leave that number unchanged, and generalized single excitations $\tau_{1,g}^I$, which move one electron between arbitrary spin-orbitals. The argument runs on one-parameter VQE prescreening: Eq. 14 optimizes each paired double alone against Hartree-Fock, Eq. 15 converts its energy gain into a block-ordering score, Eq. 17 scores each candidate single against the paired reference $|\Psi_\alpha\rangle$, and the threshold $\epsilon$ in Eq. 18 prunes inactive singles. This replaces the per-iteration gradient measurement of adaptive methods with a fixed $O(N^4)$ measurement cost per candidate, and the decomposition identities quoted in Eqs. 10 and 11 are what license the claim that this restricted pool can span arbitrary correlation.

What would settle it

Run the same ansatz-construction protocol on a small molecule in a basis where static correlation is stronger than in STO-3G, such as a stretched symmetric molecule or a twisted double bond, and compare the final energy to full configuration interaction: if a single excitation that the one-parameter screening discarded contributes substantially to the energy once later operators are present, or if the greedy order costs more CNOTs than a random order for the same accuracy, the central premise fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that strong molecular correlation can be captured by a dynamic ansatz built only from generalized rank-one single excitations and seniority-preserving paired double excitations, provided the operators are ordered by their one-parameter energy gains. The ordering protocol first optimizes each paired double alone against the Hartree-Fock state and computes $\Delta E^\alpha = E_\mathrm{HF} - E^\alpha$ (Eq. 15); doubles are then placed into blocks in descending order of this deviation. Inside each block, candidate singles are optimized against the corresponding seniority-zero reference $|\Psi_\alpha\rangle$, ranked by $\Delta E^{\alpha I} = E_\alpha - E_{\alpha I}$, and kept only when this gain exceeds a threshold $\epsilon$. The final ansatz of Eq. 19 therefore has at most $O(N^2)$ parameters, total Jordan-Wigner gate count $O(N^3)$, and worst-case linear circuit depth by the scaling analysis inherited from the generalized UCC construction. On BH, LiH, and asymmetric BeH$_2$ in the minimal STO-3G basis, the paper reports errors relative to full configuration interaction within chemical accuracy (about 1.6 millihartree) across the potential curves, with two-qubit CNOT counts an order of magnitude below the adaptive singles-and-doubles ansatz and, for LiH at one stretch, 1120 CNOTs versus 2024 for the adaptive generalized-singles-paired-doubles ansatz at similar accuracy. With particle-preserving exchange circuits for qubit excitations, CNOT counts drop below 180 for LiH at large bond length while the energy error stays within tens of microhartree.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that ordering operators by the energy each recovers on its own, first against Hartree-Fock and then against paired reference states, produces a near-optimal final ordering; the paper explicitly calls the algorithm heuristic and tests it on only three small molecules, so a failure of that local-to-global extrapolation would erode both the accuracy and the gate savings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On all three tested molecules, the ansatz stays within chemical accuracy of full configuration interaction across the whole potential curve, including stretched geometries where fixed coupled-cluster-style ansatze fail.
  • The two-qubit CNOT count per energy evaluation is roughly an order of magnitude smaller than for the gradient-based adaptive singles-and-doubles ansatz; at one stretched LiH geometry the count is 1120 versus 2024 for the adaptive generalized-singles-paired-doubles ansatz at comparable accuracy.
  • Replacing fermionic excitations with qubit excitations implemented by particle-preserving exchange circuits cuts CNOT counts by nearly an order of magnitude for LiH and BeH$_2$, bringing stretched LiH below 180 CNOTs while keeping the error within tens of microhartree.
  • Because the final circuit is shallow, a noisy-backend simulation of LiH at a bond length of 3 Angstroms shows better inherent accuracy than the fixed and adaptive ansatze compared without error mitigation, implying lower error-mitigation cost when chemical accuracy is sought.
  • Pre-circuit prescreening costs $O(N^4)$ measurements per operator and can be parallelized, whereas the gradient-based adaptive protocol pays $O(N^4 N_p)$ plus operator-pool gradient measurements across iterations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the one-parameter ordering transfers to larger active spaces, the same prescreening could be used as a cheap first filter before a gradient-based adaptive step, shrinking the operator pool that needs full gradient evaluation.
  • The reported 'burrowing' energy-versus-CNOT trajectories are heuristic evidence that local one-parameter energy gains agree with the global variational landscape; a direct test would compare the greedy order with the order given by full gradient norms for the same operator set.
  • Because the CNOT-efficient variant drops fermionic parity terms, its slight accuracy loss could be partially recovered by symmetry post-selection or by restoring the discarded terms for only a few dominant operators; the paper notes the trade-off but does not pursue it.
  • The screening shortcut of optimizing only one spin sector assumes spin-complementary singles behave identically; in open-shell or spin-symmetry-broken systems that shortcut would need to be revisited, and the measurement overhead would roughly double.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SURGE-VQE, a variational quantum eigensolver ansatz construction that selects and orders a pool of seniority-zero paired double excitations and generalized single excitations using one-parameter energy-deviation screening against Hartree–Fock and seniority-zero reference states. The final ansatz is a product of blocks, each containing a paired double and a threshold-pruned set of singles ordered by their single-parameter energy deviations. The authors claim that this construction yields chemically accurate ground-state energies for strongly correlated molecules (BH, LiH, and BeH2 in STO-3G) with low CNOT counts, shallow (linear or at worst sub-quadratic) gate depth, and minimal pre-circuit measurement overhead. The manuscript reports statevector simulations with errors relative to FCI, CNOT counts per function evaluation, comparisons with UCCSD, k-UpCCGSD, ADAPT-SD, and ADAPT-gSpD, energy-vs-CNOT convergence curves, a CNOT-efficient qubit-excitation variant, and a noisy simulation for LiH using a FakeMelbourne noise model.

Significance. If the resource claims are correct, SURGE-VQE would be a useful gate-efficient VQE ansatz design: it provides a heuristic, gradient-free alternative to ADAPT-style operator selection, with explicit numerical evidence of chemical accuracy and order-of-magnitude CNOT reductions on three benchmark molecules. The manuscript is honest about the heuristic nature of the selection in Sec. IV and compares against several standard baselines. The numerical benchmarks themselves (errors vs. FCI, CNOT counts, noise robustness) are a strength, as are the explicit acknowledgments of the method's limitations. However, the central scaling claims about parameter count, gate depth, and measurement overhead are not established by the current analysis, and the claimed minimal pre-circuit overhead is not actually measured.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II D, Eq. (19)] The claimed O(N^2) parameter upper bound is not supported by the ansatz construction. In Eq. (19), each of the nonv blocks can contain up to M_alpha <= N^2 singles, and the text explicitly allows a given single to reappear in different blocks. The total number of variational parameters is therefore nonv + sum_alpha M_alpha, which in the worst case scales as O(N^4), not O(N^2). The statement that "the overall parameter scaling is governed by the leading contribution from generalized single excitations, ensuring that the scaling remains upper-bounded at O(N^2)" is internally inconsistent with this construction. Since the linear gate-depth argument is borrowed from k-UpCCGSD, which has a fixed number k of operator layers, it does not transfer to an ansatz with unbounded repetitions across blocks. The authors must either prove (or numerically demonstrate) that the threshold epsilon keeps every M_alpha = O(1), or revise the abstract and conclusion claims of shallow linear/sub-quadratic gate depth to refer only to the specific small systems tested.
  2. [Sec. II C and II D] The claim of "minimal pre-circuit measurement overhead" is not supported by any measurement count, shot count, or total overhead estimate. The prescreening procedure requires one one-parameter VQE for each of the nonv paired doubles (Step 2) and, for each block, for each candidate single (Step 4). With nonv ~ O(N^2) and ~O(N^2) singles, this is O(N^4) one-parameter optimizations, each requiring repeated energy measurements of the O(N^4) Hamiltonian terms; the worst-case total measurement scaling is therefore O(N^8), which does not obviously constitute "minimal" overhead. The manuscript only states the per-prescreening-cycle scaling O(N^4) and does not count the number of cycles. Please report the actual number of one-parameter optimizations performed for the benchmark molecules, the total number of circuit executions or shots used in the prescreening phase, and, ideally, an apples-to-apples comparison with the measurement budget of ADAPT-VQE under matched convergence criteria.
  3. [Sec. III A, Figs. 1 and 2] The gate-count comparisons to ADAPT-VQE are not made under matched stopping criteria. In Fig. 1, ADAPT-SD and ADAPT-gSpD use eigenvalue and gradient thresholds of 1e-8, while SURGE-VQE uses epsilon = 1e-6 for its preselection. The reported CNOT advantage of SURGE-VQE over ADAPT may therefore be partially attributable to the different thresholds rather than to the operator ordering or seniority-based selection. In Fig. 2, the eigenvalue threshold for ADAPT-gSpD is relaxed to 1e-6, but this is not consistent across all comparisons. To substantiate the "gate-efficient" claim, the authors should include ADAPT runs truncated at a comparable accuracy target (e.g., where each method first reaches chemical accuracy) and compare CNOT counts at that point, or at least report the sensitivity of the ADAPT CNOT counts to the chosen thresholds.
  4. [Sec. II C.4, Sec. IV] The threshold epsilon is a free parameter of the method, and no sensitivity analysis is provided. All reported results use epsilon = 1e-6 for all three molecules, and the authors explicitly state in Sec. IV that the algorithm is heuristic and that the ordering may not be optimal. Without tests varying epsilon (for example, 1e-4, 1e-6, 1e-8), it is unclear whether the reported accuracy/CNOT trade-off is robust or a fine-tuned artifact of the chosen threshold. This is particularly relevant because the operator ordering—the load-bearing step of the method—depends directly on the relative magnitudes of the one-parameter energy deviations, which are thresholded by epsilon.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eqs. (13)-(14)] The sign convention for the anti-Hermitian operator is inconsistent: Eq. (13) writes e^{theta_alpha tau_alpha}, while Eq. (14) writes e^{-theta_alpha tau_alpha} H e^{theta_alpha tau_alpha}. Please state explicitly that tau_alpha is anti-Hermitian and clarify the convention used in the circuit implementation.
  2. [Sec. II C, Eq. (17)] The symbol N in Eq. (17) ("I in [1, N^2), N refers to the total number of spin-orbitals") is not defined until Sec. II D. Please define N and the notation no/nv at first use.
  3. [Sec. III A] Reference 39 is cited for the Jordan-Wigner transformation, but the cited paper describes the Bravyi-Kitaev transformation. Either the citation or the mapping name should be corrected.
  4. [Sec. III A, Sec. II C.1] The text says ADAPT-gSpD uses "an operator pool identical to ours," but Step 1 of the SURGE construction applies orbital-symmetry pruning to the singles. Please clarify whether the ADAPT-gSpD calculations use the same pruned pool or the full generalized-singles-plus-paired-doubles pool.
  5. [Sec. IV] The conclusion states that the CNOT-efficient formulation brings the CNOT count "under 180 CNOTs even for challenging cases such as LiH at highly stretched bond lengths," but this specific number is not easily located in Fig. 3. Please report the exact value or add a table with the CNOT counts for all systems and geometries.
  6. [Eq. (18)] Please specify what happens when no singles in a block satisfy Delta E_alpha I > epsilon: is the block left with only the paired double, or are the singles included regardless?

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SURGE-VQE is a heuristic operator-ordering method benchmarked against FCI, not a derivation whose output is built into its input.

full rationale

SURGE-VQE's operator ordering is selected from one-parameter energy deviations (Eqs. 14, 15, 17), i.e., by evaluating the same Hamiltonian that is later used in the final VQE optimization. This is a standard adaptive/greedy screening heuristic rather than a circular derivation: the paper does not present these energy deviations as independent predictions, and it explicitly disclaims optimality ('we do not claim that the relative ordering of operators derived from our method is necessarily the best or most optimal... the algorithm we developed are heuristic in nature'). The final energies are benchmarked against externally computed FCI values, and the operator pool (generalized singles plus paired doubles) is taken from prior external work (k-UpCCGSD, DISCO-VQE, tUPS) with explicit acknowledgment rather than being justified by the present authors' own results. The invoked decomposition theorems (Evangelista; Burton) are external mathematical results, not self-citations. Self-citations to COMPASS-VQE, COMPACT-VQE, RBM-VQE, and future-work references are contextual and not load-bearing; there is no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' own prior work. The possible overcounting of repeated singles across blocks at Eq. 19 and the resulting O(N^2) parameter bound are internal-consistency/correctness concerns about the gate-depth claim, not circularity, because the claimed bound is borrowed from an external reference (Lee et al.) rather than derived from the paper's own fitted output. Accordingly, no step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on known fermionic operator decomposition theorems, standard Hamiltonian and mapping assumptions, and the unproven heuristic that greedy one-parameter energy screening orders operators near-optimally. No new physical entities are introduced, and no code or data are shipped, so the numerical validation is not independently checkable.

free parameters (1)
  • prescreening threshold epsilon = 1e-6
    User-defined threshold in Eq. 18 below which singles are dropped from sub-blocks. Set to 1e-6 for all test cases with no sensitivity analysis; it directly trades ansatz size against accuracy and is a free hyperparameter of the method.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation and second-quantized molecular Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1-2).
    Standard background for electronic structure; not verified in this paper.
  • standard math Any n-electron excitation can be decomposed into nested commutators of rank-one and rank-two operators (Evangelista et al., Eq. 10).
    Cited theorem used to justify limiting the operator pool to generalized singles and paired doubles; assumed correct.
  • standard math Any two-electron unpaired excitation can be decomposed into nested commutators of seniority-preserving paired excitations and one-electron operators (Burton et al., Eq. 11).
    Cited decomposition underpins the claim that the chosen pool covers higher seniority sectors.
  • ad hoc to paper Greedy one-parameter energy deviations (Eqs. 14-18) rank operators near-optimally for the final many-parameter ansatz.
    This is the core heuristic of SURGE-VQE; the authors explicitly call it heuristic in Sec. IV and provide no proof or stress test.
  • domain assumption Spin-complementary singles can be prescreened using one spin sector only.
    Assumed to yield the same selection and ordering for the opposite spin sector; reduces search space by half but is not demonstrated per system.
  • domain assumption Qubit-excitation exchange circuits implementing rank-one operators have O(1) gate complexity and retain sufficient accuracy when parity terms are removed.
    Taken from Yordanov et al. and tested on three molecules; the accuracy loss is reported empirically but not explained from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient quantum state preparation through seniority driven operator selection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P4XLUQQB

@misc{pith2026250419760,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient quantum state preparation through seniority driven operator selection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P4XLUQQB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19760}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum algorithms require accurate representations of electronic states on a quantum device, yet the approximation of electronic wave functions for strongly correlated systems remains a profound theoretical challenge, with existing methods struggling to balance the competing demands of chemical accuracy and gate efficiency. Moreover, a critical limitation of the most of the state-of-the-art methods developed to date lies in their substantial reliance on extensive pre-circuit measurements, which introduce significant overheads and contribute to inefficiencies in practical implementation. To address these interconnected challenges and establish a harmonious synergy between them, we propose an algorithmic framework that focuses on efficiently capturing the molecular strong correlation through an ordered set of computationally less demanding rank-one and seniority-zero excitations, yielding a parameterized ansatz with shallow gate depth. Furthermore, to achieve minimal pre-circuit measurement overhead, we implement a selective pruning of excitations through a hybrid approach that combines intuition-based selection with shallow-depth, rank-one excitations driven uni-parameter circuit optimization strategy. With the incorporation of qubit-based excitations via particle-preserving exchange circuits, we demonstrate a further reduction in quantum complexities, enhancing the overall resource efficiency of the approach. With a range of challenging applications on strongly correlated systems, we demonstrate that our dynamic ansatz not only significantly enhances computational efficiency but also delivers exceptional accuracy, robustness, and resilience to the noisy environments inherent in near-term quantum hardware.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19760 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    McArdle , author S

    author author S. McArdle , author S. Endo , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author S. C. \ Benjamin ,\ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ title title Quantum computational chemistry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003

  2. [2]

    author author D. S. \ Abrams \ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ title title Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5162 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 5162--5165 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.5162

  3. [3]

    Peruzzo , author J

    author author A. Peruzzo , author J. McClean , author P. Shadbolt , author M.-H. \ Yung , author X.-Q. \ Zhou , author P. J. \ Love , author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ and\ author J. L. \ O'Brien ,\ title title A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 5 ( ...

    doi:10.1038/ncomms5213

  4. [4]

    Kandala , author A

    author author A. Kandala , author A. Mezzacapo , author K. Temme , author M. Takita , author M. Brink , author J. M. \ Chow ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ title title Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879 journal journal Nature \ volume 549 ,\ pages 242--246 (...

    doi:10.1038/nature23879

  5. [5]

    Anand , author P

    author author A. Anand , author P. Schleich , author S. Alperin-Lea , author P. W. K. \ Jensen , author S. Sim , author M. Díaz-Tinoco , author J. S. \ Kottmann , author M. Degroote , author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ title title A quantum computing view on unitary coupled cluster theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00932J journ...

    doi:10.1039/d1cs00932j

  6. [6]

    Tilly , author H

    author author J. Tilly , author H. Chen , author S. Cao , author D. Picozzi , author K. Setia , author Y. Li , author E. Grant , author L. Wossnig , author I. Rungger , author G. H. \ Booth ,\ and\ author J. Tennyson ,\ title title The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phy...

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003

  7. [7]

    Romero , author R

    author author J. Romero , author R. Babbush , author J. R. \ McClean , author C. Hempel , author P. J. \ Love ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ title title Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 4 ,\ pa...

    doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4

  8. [8]

    author author H. R. \ Grimsley , author D. Claudino , author S. E. \ Economou , author E. Barnes ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ title title Is the trotterized uccsd ansatz chemically well-defined? \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01083 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1--6 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01083

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Lee , author W

    author author J. Lee , author W. J. \ Huggins , author M. Head-Gordon ,\ and\ author K. B. \ Whaley ,\ title title Generalized unitary coupled cluster wave functions for quantum computation , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01004 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Halder , author V

    author author D. Halder , author V. S. \ Prasannaa ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Dual exponential coupled cluster theory: Unitary adaptation, implementation in the variational quantum eigensolver framework and pilot applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114688 ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Köhn \ and\ author J

    author author A. Köhn \ and\ author J. Olsen ,\ title title Capabilities and limits of the unitary coupled-cluster approach with generalized two-body cluster operators , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104815 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 157 ,\ pages 1...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author H. R. \ Grimsley , author S. E. \ Economou , author E. Barnes ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ title title An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 journal journal Natu...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author H. G. A. \ Burton , author D. Marti-Dafcik , author D. P. \ Tew ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Wales ,\ title title Exact electronic states with shallow quantum circuits from global optimisation , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00744-2 journal journal npj Quantum I...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Mondal , author D

    author author D. Mondal , author D. Halder , author S. Halder ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Development of a compact Ansatz via operator commutativity screening: Digital quantum simulation of molecular systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0153182 journal journal The...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Halder , author D

    author author D. Halder , author D. Mondal ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Noise-independent route toward the genesis of a compact ansatz for molecular energetics: A dynamic approach , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0198277 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Halder , author A

    author author S. Halder , author A. Dey , author C. Shrikhande ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Machine learning assisted construction of a shallow depth dynamic ansatz for noisy quantum hardware , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC05807G journal journal Chem. Sci. \ ,\ pag...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Metcalf , author N

    author author M. Metcalf , author N. P. \ Bauman , author K. Kowalski ,\ and\ author W. A. \ de Jong ,\ title title Resource-efficient chemistry on quantum computers with the variational quantum eigensolver and the double unitary coupled-cluster approach , \ https://doi.org/10...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author I. G. \ Ryabinkin , author T.-C. \ Yen , author S. N. \ Genin ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ title title Qubit coupled cluster method: A systematic approach to quantum chemistry on a quantum computer , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00932 journal journa...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author I. G. \ Ryabinkin , author R. A. \ Lang , author S. N. \ Genin ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ title title Iterative qubit coupled cluster approach with efficient screening of generators , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01084 journal journal Journal of C...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Fan , author C

    author author Y. Fan , author C. Cao , author X. Xu , author Z. Li , author D. Lv ,\ and\ author M.-H. \ Yung ,\ @noop title Circuit-depth reduction of unitary-coupled-cluster ansatz by energy sorting , \ ( year 2023 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15210 arXiv:2106.15210 [quant...

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    author author I. O. \ Sokolov , author P. K. \ Barkoutsos , author P. J. \ Ollitrault , author D. Greenberg , author J. Rice , author M. Pistoia ,\ and\ author I. Tavernelli ,\ title title Quantum orbital-optimized unitary coupled cluster methods in the strongly correlated reg...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Mizukami , author K

    author author W. Mizukami , author K. Mitarai , author Y. O. \ Nakagawa , author T. Yamamoto , author T. Yan ,\ and\ author Y.-y. \ Ohnishi ,\ title title Orbital optimized unitary coupled cluster theory for quantum computer , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033421...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author D. A. \ Fedorov , author Y. Alexeev , author S. K. \ Gray ,\ and\ author M. Otten ,\ title title Unitary S elective C oupled- C luster M ethod , \ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-05-02-703 journal journal Quantum \ volume 6 ,\ pages 703 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    author author S. G. \ Mehendale , author B. Peng , author N. Govind ,\ and\ author Y. Alexeev ,\ title title Exploring parameter redundancy in the unitary coupled-cluster ans \"a tze for hybrid variational quantum computing , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c00550 journal ...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Matsuzawa \ and\ author Y

    author author Y. Matsuzawa \ and\ author Y. Kurashige ,\ title title Jastrow-type decomposition in quantum chemistry for low-depth quantum circuits , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00963 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 16 ,\ pages 944-...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Haidar , author M

    author author M. Haidar , author M. J. \ Rančić , author Y. Maday ,\ and\ author J.-P. \ Piquemal ,\ title title Extension of the trotterized unitary coupled cluster to triple excitations , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c01753 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chem...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Haidar , author O

    author author M. Haidar , author O. Adjoua , author S. Badreddine , author A. Peruzzo ,\ and\ author J.-P. \ Piquemal ,\ title title Non-iterative disentangled unitary coupled-cluster based on lie-algebraic structure , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/adb3c5 journal journal...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Feniou , author M

    author author C. Feniou , author M. Hassan , author D. Traor \'e , author E. Giner , author Y. Maday ,\ and\ author J.-P. \ Piquemal ,\ title title Overlap-adapt-vqe: practical quantum chemistry on quantum computers via overlap-guided compact ans \"a tze , \ https://doi.org/10...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Magoulas \ and\ author F

    author author I. Magoulas \ and\ author F. A. \ Evangelista ,\ title title Cnot-efficient circuits for arbitrary rank many-body fermionic and qubit excitations , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01016 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 19 ,...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Tecmer , author K

    author author P. Tecmer , author K. Boguslawski , author P. A. \ Johnson , author P. A. \ Limacher , author M. Chan , author T. Verstraelen ,\ and\ author P. W. \ Ayers ,\ title title Assessing the accuracy of new geminal-based approaches , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502127v ...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Boguslawski , author P

    author author K. Boguslawski , author P. Tecmer , author P. W. \ Ayers , author P. Bultinck , author S. De Baerdemacker ,\ and\ author D. Van Neck ,\ title title Efficient description of strongly correlated electrons with mean-field cost , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Stein , author T

    author author T. Stein , author T. M. \ Henderson ,\ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ title title Seniority zero pair coupled cluster doubles theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4880819 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 140 ,\ pages 214113 ( year 2014 ) ...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author T. M. \ Henderson , author I. W. \ Bulik , author T. Stein ,\ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ title title Seniority-based coupled cluster theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904384 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 141 ,\ pages 244104 ( y...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author H. G. A. \ Burton ,\ title title Tiled unitary product states for strongly correlated hamiltonians , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/D4FD00064A journal journal Faraday Discuss. \ volume 254 ,\ pages 157--169 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author F. A. \ Evangelista , author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ title title Exact parameterization of fermionic wave functions via unitary coupled cluster theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5133059 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author W. J. \ Hehre , author R. F. \ Stewart ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title Self‐consistent molecular‐orbital methods. i. use of gaussian expansions of slater‐type atomic orbitals , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1672392 journal journal The Journal of Chemica...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Sun , author T

    author author Q. Sun , author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author N. S. \ Blunt , author G. H. \ Booth , author S. Guo , author Z. Li , author J. Liu , author J. D. \ McClain , author E. R. \ Sayfutyarova , author S. Sharma , author S. Wouters ,\ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ title t...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author T. Q. N. \ developers \ and\ author contributors ,\ @noop title Qiskit nature 0.6.0 , \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  31. [39]

    author author J. T. \ Seeley , author M. J. \ Richard ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Love ,\ title title The bravyi-kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768229 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 137 ...

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author R. H. \ Byrd , author P. Lu , author J. Nocedal ,\ and\ author C. Zhu ,\ title title A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization , \ https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069 journal journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1190--...

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author Y. S. \ Yordanov , author D. R. M. \ Arvidsson-Shukur ,\ and\ author C. H. W. \ Barnes ,\ title title Efficient quantum circuits for quantum computational chemistry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.062612 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 102 ,\ pages...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author Y. S. \ Yordanov , author V. Armaos , author C. H. W. \ Barnes ,\ and\ author D. R. M. \ Arvidsson-Shukur ,\ title title Qubit-excitation-based adaptive variational quantum eigensolver , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00730-0 journal journal Communications ...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Xia \ and\ author S

    author author R. Xia \ and\ author S. Kais ,\ title title Qubit coupled cluster singles and doubles variational quantum eigensolver ansatz for electronic structure calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abbc74 journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume...

    doi

  36. [44]

    \ Xie , author W.-g

    author author Q.-X. \ Xie , author W.-g. \ Zhang , author X.-S. \ Xu , author S. Liu ,\ and\ author Y. Zhao ,\ title title Qubit unitary coupled cluster with generalized single and paired double excitations ansatz for variational quantum eigensolver , \ https://doi.org/https:/...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Lan \ and\ author W

    author author Z. Lan \ and\ author W. Liang ,\ title title Amplitude reordering accelerates the adaptive variational quantum eigensolver algorithms , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00403 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 18 ,\ pages 5267...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Patra , author S

    author author C. Patra , author S. Halder ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Projective quantum eigensolver via adiabatically decoupled subsystem evolution: A resource efficient approach to molecular energetics in noisy quantum computers , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0210...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Patra , author D

    author author C. Patra , author D. Mukherjee , author S. Halder , author D. Mondal ,\ and\ author R. Maitra ,\ title title Toward a resource-optimized dynamic quantum algorithm via non-iterative auxiliary subspace corrections , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0229137 journal journ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.