Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Thin accretion disk around a Kerr black hole immersed in swirling universes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The swirling background of a Kerr black hole shifts the thin disk's flux, temperature, and spectrum in ways that spin cannot mimic.

desk verdict A competent first thin-disk calculation for swirling-Kerr black holes, though the headline low-frequency luminosity trend may ride on an ad hoc outer boundary. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20582 v2 pith:VXVI7IS3 submitted 2025-04-29 gr-qc

Yuxin Ouyang , Xuan Zhou , Songbai Chen , Jiliang Jing This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C10 PACS 04.70.-s98.62.Mw97.60.Lf
keywords swirlinguniverseKerrblackholethinaccretiondiskenergyfluxemissionspectrumconversionefficiencymarginallystableorbitEhlerstransformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the swirling parameter j, which encodes the rotation of the universe surrounding a Kerr black hole, leaves observable imprints on the thin accretion disk that are qualitatively different from the familiar spin effects. If true, disk flux, temperature, and spectrum measurements could in principle tell a swirling background apart from changes in black-hole spin. The paper finds that j raises the energy flux and temperature of the inner disk, lowers them in the outer disk, hardens the spectrum by raising the cutoff while dimming lower frequencies, and lowers the efficiency of converting accreted mass into radiation. The spin a, by contrast, raises flux and temperature everywhere and increases efficiency. The effects of j weaken as a grows, so any imprint would be most visible for slowly spinning black holes.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the swirling parameter j of the Ehlers-transformed Kerr metric, a stationary axisymmetric vacuum solution whose metric functions F and omega are finite power series in j, together with the standard thin-disk flux integral $$K(r) = -\frac{\dot{M}_0\,\Omega_{\phi,r}}{4\pi\sqrt{-g}(E-L\Omega_\phi)^2}\int_{r_{\rm ms}}^r (E-L\Omega_\phi)L_{,r}\,dr.$$ The paper evaluates the geodesic energy E, angular momentum L, and angular velocity Omega_phi for equatorial circular orbits, finds the marginally stable orbit rms by the condition Veff,rr = 0 numerically, and feeds these into the flux, the Stefan-Boltzmann temperature, the blackbody luminosity integral (23), and the efficiency epsilon = 1 - E(rms). The key new ingredient is that the background swirl makes the angular velocity non-monotonic and shifts rms downward, which drives the distinct flux and spectrum signatures.

What would settle it

Compute the off-equatorial linear stability of the circular geodesics used for the disk: integrate the geodesic deviation for a particle displaced slightly in theta at radii between rms and the outer disk for representative (a, j). If the theta-oscillations grow exponentially, those orbits are not stable and the computed flux, temperature, and spectra would not be the physical disk emission. A simpler observational check is to compare the predicted low-frequency dimming with low-frequency disk spectra from a source whose spin is measured independently.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the swirling-Kerr spacetime, the swirling parameter j acts as a distinct knob on disk emission: increasing j shifts the disk's radiating inner edge inward (rms drops for both prograde and retrograde orbits), boosts the local energy flux and temperature at small radii, suppresses them at large radii, raises the spectral cutoff while reducing low-frequency luminosity, and decreases the conversion efficiency epsilon = 1 - E(rms). These trends are opposite or orthogonal to those of the Kerr spin a, which increases flux and temperature everywhere and raises efficiency. The paper further claims that spin suppresses the swirling effects, so deviations from Kerr are most pronounced for low-spin holes, and that for j != 0 the orbital angular velocity is non-monotonic, leading to a radius where the standard flux formula changes sign; the model is valid only on the branch where the flux stays positive.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the standard thin-disk picture — steady inflow along stable circular orbits confined to the equatorial plane, radiating locally as a blackbody — remains valid in this swirling, non-asymptotically-flat spacetime; the paper does not prove stability of those orbits against off-equatorial perturbations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed black-hole mass and accretion rate, a stronger swirling background moves the peak of the energy-flux and temperature profiles inward, so the inner disk shines brighter while the outer disk cools.
  • The thermal spectrum of the disk acquires a higher cutoff frequency but a dimmer low-frequency tail as j grows, giving a harder, low-luminosity spectrum rather than the uniformly brighter spectrum produced by spin.
  • The conversion efficiency epsilon = 1 - E(rms) decreases with j, so a swirling background lowers the fraction of accreted rest-mass energy radiated, and this reduction is largest for small spin.
  • Because rms drops with j for both prograde and retrograde disks, the inner edge of the disk moves closer to the horizon in a swirling universe.
  • For j != 0, the orbital angular velocity has a turning point where Omega_{phi,r} = 0; the flux formula changes sign there, marking the boundary beyond which the thin-disk accretion picture breaks down.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to treat j as a free parameter in fits to continuum spectra of accreting black holes: the crossover radius where the j-boosted inner flux meets the j-suppressed outer flux could be a measurable scale that distinguishes swirling from spin.
  • The sign change in flux near Omega_{phi,r} = 0 suggests a possible gap or depleted ring in the disk emission; if such a gap were observed between the inner hot zone and outer cool zone, it would be a distinctive swirling signature not present in Kerr.
  • Since the swirling metric is only written to order j^2, one could test higher-order corrections by constructing the exact Ehlers-transformed metric and checking whether the qualitative flux trends survive at larger j.
  • Because the spacetime lacks an asymptotically flat infinity, the luminosity integral (23) assumes photons escape to infinity; an inference from the paper's own caveat is that a fully consistent spectrum would need redshift factors for finite-distance observers and a global definition of efficiency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies timelike circular geodesics and steady-state thin accretion disks around a Kerr black hole immersed in a swirling universe, parametrized by the swirling parameter j. Using the standard Novikov-Thorne flux formula, the authors compute the energy flux K(r), radiation temperature T(r), thermal blackbody spectrum L(ν), and conversion efficiency ε for various values of j and the black hole spin a. The main reported effects are that increasing j raises the flux and temperature at small radii while lowering them at large radii, raises the spectral cutoff frequency while lowering the low-frequency luminosity, and decreases the conversion efficiency ε = 1 - E(rms). These trends are contrasted with the spin parameter a, which increases the flux, temperature, cutoff, and efficiency. The paper also reports that rms decreases with j for both prograde and retrograde orbits, and that spin suppresses the effects of swirling.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers concrete, parameter-free predictions from the metric for how a swirling cosmological background would imprint on accretion disk observables, which is a useful addition to the growing literature on swirling black hole spacetimes. The geodesic setup is standard, the j = 0 limit correctly reduces to Kerr, and no fitted parameters are used; the swirling parameter is scanned as an input. However, the significance is contingent on two load-bearing assumptions that are not established in the manuscript: first, that the steady thin-disk model applies in a spacetime that is non-asymptotically flat and has no globally timelike Killing vector; second, that the outer truncation of the disk at Ω_φ,r = 0 is physically justified. Since the headline spectral prediction (low-frequency luminosity decrease with j) may be an artifact of that truncation, the current version is not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (22) and Fig. 4] The outer boundary of the radiating disk is effectively set by the condition Ω_φ,r = 0, without a physical derivation. The text states that when Ω_φ,r > 0 and K(r) < 0 the accreting particle is 'excreted' and the disk model is invalid, so the analysis is restricted to Ω_φ,r < 0. This is not a consequence of the geodesic equations or the disk conservation laws: a negative K in Eq. (22) only indicates that the assumed positive-stress, stress-free-at-ISCO solution is incompatible with the sign of Ω_φ,r, not that accretion ceases. Circular orbits in the excluded region can still be stable, since stability is controlled by the epicyclic frequencies rather than by the sign of dΩ/dr. Because the Ω_φ,r = 0 radius shrinks as j grows, the truncation preferentially removes the cool outer disk, which can produce exactly the reported decrease of low-frequency luminosity in Eq. (23). The authors should either justify the truncation from the disk physics (e.g., the radius where matter is injected, or where the thin-disk approximation breaks down), or check the robustness of the spectral prediction by integrating Eq. (23) over fixed outer radii and over a range of outer radii.
  2. [Section II and III, applicability of the thin-disk model] The thin-disk calculation assumes that matter moves on nearly geodesic circular orbits in the equatorial plane and that the disk is vertically thin and in hydrostatic equilibrium. In the swirling-Kerr spacetime, geodesic motion away from the equatorial plane is known to be chaotic (refs. [36,37]), and the background is non-asymptotically flat. The manuscript does not examine the stability of the equatorial circular orbits against off-equatorial (vertical) perturbations, so it does not establish that a thin disk can actually be supported in this spacetime. A check of the vertical epicyclic frequency or of V_eff,zz over the relevant parameter range is needed to justify the use of the standard thin-disk formalism.
  3. [Section III, Eqs. (23) and (24)] The definitions of the observed luminosity and the conversion efficiency rely on an asymptotic observer and on photons escaping to infinity, but the swirling-Kerr spacetime is non-asymptotically flat and ∂t is not everywhere timelike. Equation (24), ε = 1 - E(rms), is the standard asymptotically-flat result, and Eq. (23) assumes a distant observer receiving thermal radiation with no gravitational redshift factor. The paper only notes that a ZAMO can be defined on the symmetry axis, which is not the location of the disk or the observer used in Eqs. (23)–(24). Without an explicit derivation of these observables in the swirling background, the efficiency values and spectral luminosities reported in Figs. 6 and 7 lack a clear operational meaning.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section I] There are several typographical errors, including 'Furhtermore' and 'potenials', which should be corrected.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (23)] The integration limits ri and rout are not explicitly stated when Eq. (23) is introduced; the manuscript should state clearly that ri = rms and rout is the Ω_φ,r = 0 radius, and how rout depends on j and a.
  3. [Fig. 6] The horizontal axis is labeled 'Log ν' without specifying the base; if it is log10 this should be stated, and the axis label should reflect the plotted quantity consistently.
  4. [Section II, metric (7)] The physical dimension of the swirling parameter j (apparently length^{-2}) and the corresponding regime of validity for the chosen j values should be stated explicitly, since the metric and all figures use M = 1.
  5. [References] Reference [48] refers to a 'non-commutating Kerr black hole'; the intended term is likely 'non-commutative', and this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the disk flux, temperature, spectrum, and efficiency are computed directly from the swirling-Kerr metric and geodesics, with j treated as an input parameter rather than a fitted quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. The swirling-Kerr metric is taken from the external reference [35], and the steady-state thin-disk formalism from the standard Novikov-Thorne reference [47], with Eqs. (15), (22), (23), and (24) following from the metric, circular geodesic conditions, and the standard disk model without free parameters. The swirling parameter j is scanned over a chosen range, not fitted to produce the claimed trends, so the flux, temperature, and spectral behaviors are genuine outputs of the computation rather than re-statements of an input. The marginally stable orbit radius is obtained numerically from Veff,rr = 0, and the efficiency epsilon = 1 - E(rms) is evaluated from the geodesic energy at that radius. The truncation at Omega_phi,r = 0, while perhaps physically questionable and a legitimate correctness concern, is an explicit modeling assumption rather than a circularity: the paper does not tune the cutoff to force the low-frequency luminosity decrease, and the quantity being predicted is not defined as the fitted input. The self-citations, [37] and [39], are contextual references to prior studies of chaotic motion and thick tori and are not load-bearing for the thin-disk flux, spectrum, or efficiency results. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is merely relabeled. Therefore the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation is a direct evaluation of standard disk formulas on a metric imported from ref [35]. The scanned parameters j and a are inputs, not fitted values. The main unexamined assumptions are the applicability of the thin disk model to a non-asymptotically flat spacetime with chaotic geodesic motion, and the interpretation of efficiency.

free parameters (2)
  • swirling parameter j = scanned over 0 to 0.0005 (M=1)
    Input parameter of the swirling-Kerr metric from ref [35]; not fitted to data. All qualitative claims are statements of dependence on this parameter.
  • black hole spin parameter a = scanned over 0 to 0.9 (M=1)
    Input parameter of the Kerr seed; scanned to compare j-dependence against spin-dependence. Not fitted.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The swirling-Kerr metric (Eqs. 7-13) from ref [35] is an exact vacuum solution and the j^2 truncation is accurate for the scanned j values.
    The paper imports the metric without re-deriving it; if the metric or its truncation is wrong, all disk calculations change.
  • domain assumption The steady-state Novikov-Thorne thin disk model (ref [47]) applies to this spacetime.
    The model assumes H<<r, constant accretion rate, and radiative cooling; the paper applies it on the equatorial plane without modification.
  • domain assumption Stable equatorial circular geodesics represent the mean motion of the accreting gas.
    The paper uses the effective potential (14) and rms condition Veff,rr=0, but the full geodesic flow in this spacetime is chaotic (refs [36,37]); off-equatorial stability is not checked.
  • standard math The relation E,r = Omega L,r holds for circular orbits.
    Standard geodesic identity in stationary axisymmetric spacetimes, used to derive the flux formula (22).
  • ad hoc to paper The conversion efficiency epsilon = 1 - E(rms) is physically meaningful in a non-asymptotically flat spacetime.
    The paper assumes all photons escape to infinity and uses the Killing energy E at rms, but the spacetime has no asymptotically flat infinity and no globally timelike Killing vector; this is not justified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thin accretion disk around a Kerr black hole immersed in swirling universes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXVI7IS3

@misc{pith2026250420582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thin accretion disk around a Kerr black hole immersed in swirling universes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXVI7IS3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20582}
}
read the original abstract

We have studied the properties of thin accretion disks around swirling-Kerr black holes, which own an extra swirling parameter describing the rotation of the immersed universe. Our results show that the swirling parameter leaves distinct imprints on the energy flux, temperature distribution and emission spectra of the disk and gives rise to some new effects that differ from those induced by the black hole's spin. With the increasing of the swirling parameter, both the energy flux and radiated temperature in the disk increase in the inner region where circular orbital radii are smaller and decrease in the outer region where circular orbital radii are larger. In contrast, these quantities consistently increase with the black hole's spin. Although the swirling parameter and the black hole's spin parameter lead to higher cut-off frequencies, the background swirling reduces the observed luminosity of the disk at lower frequencies and enhances it only at higher frequencies, which is quite distinct from that of the black hole's spin. Furthermore, the conversion efficiency increases with the black hole's spin parameter, but decreases with the swirling parameters. Additionally, the effects of the swirling parameter are found to be suppressed by the black hole's spin parameter. These results could help us further understand the properties of thin accretion disks and the swirling of the universe background.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20582 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Changes of the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Changes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Changes of the marginally stable orbit radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Variation of the energy flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Variation of the radiation temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Variation of the emission spectrum with the swirling parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Variation of the efficiency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Accretion and Neutrino Investigations of Thermodynamically Reconstructed Black Holes from Three-Parameter Generalized Entropy

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A generalized-entropy black-hole model with horizon temperature fixed by entropy predicts sign-controlled ISCO, shadow, and efficiency shifts, but relies on an arbitrary exterior profile p.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Porth et al

    O. Porth et al. [Event Horizon Telescope], The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Code Comparison Project, Astrophys. J. 243 no. 2, 26 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Fishbone and V

    L.G. Fishbone and V. Moncrief, Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes , Astrophys. J. 207, 962-976 (1976)

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Font, Numerical Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics in General Relativity , Living Rev

    J.A. Font, Numerical Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics in General Relativity , Living Rev. Rel. 11 7 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Porth, H

    O. Porth, H. Olivares, Y. Mizuno, Z. Younsi, L. Rezzolla, M. Moscibrodzka, H. Falcke, and M. Kramer, The Black Hole Accretion Code, Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol. 4, 1 (2017); arXiv:1611.09720 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Anton, O

    L. Anton, O. Zanotti, J.A. Miralles, J.M. Marti, J.M. Ibanez, J.A. Font, and J.A. Pons, Numerical 3+1 General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics: A Local Characteristic Approach , Astrophys. J. 637, 296-312 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Black Holes in Binary Systems. Observational Appearance , Astron. Astrophys. 24 33 (1973). 15

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Harko, Z

    T. Harko, Z. Kov`acs, F.S.N. Lobo, Thin accretion disk signatures in dynamical Chern–Simons-modified gravity , Class. Quantum Grav. 27, no. 10, 105010 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Harko, Z

    T. Harko, Z. Kov`acs, F.S.N. Lobo, Testing Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity using thin accretion disk properties, Phys. Rev. D, 80, 044021 (2009)

    work page 2009

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Harko, Z

    T. Harko, Z. Kov` acs, F.S.N. Lobo, Electromagnetic signatures of thin accretion disks in wormhole geometries , Phys. Rev. D, 78, 084005 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Harko, Z

    T. Harko, Z. Kov`acs, F.S.N. Lobo, Thin accretion disks in stationary axisymmetric wormhole spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D, 79, 064001 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Harko, Z

    T. Harko, Z. Kov`acs, F.S.N. Lobo, Can accretion disk properties distinguish gravastars from black holes? , Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 215006 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Bhattacharyya, A.V

    S. Bhattacharyya, A.V. Thampan, I. Bombaci, Temperature profiles of accretion discs around rapidly rotating strange stars in general relativity: A comparison with neutron stars , Astron. Astrophys. 372 925 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Kov`acs, K.S

    Z. Kov`acs, K.S. Cheng, T. Harko, Thin accretion disks around neutron and quark stars , Astron. Astrophys. 500 621 (2009), arXiv:0903.4746

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    D. F. Torres, Accretion disc onto a static non-baryonic compact object , Nucl. Phys. B 626, 377 (2002), arXiv: [hep-ph]/0201154

    2002

  7. [15]

    Y. Yuan, R. Narayan, M.J. Rees, Constraining Alternate Models of Black Holes: Type I X-Ray Bursts on Accreting Fermion-Fermion and Boson-Fermion Stars, Astrophys. J. 606 no. 2, 1112-1124 (2004), arXiv:[astro-ph]/0401549

    2004

  8. [16]

    Guzman, Accretion disk onto boson stars: A way to supplant black hole candidates , Phys

    F.S. Guzman, Accretion disk onto boson stars: A way to supplant black hole candidates , Phys. Rev. D, 73, 021501 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    C.S.J. Pun, Z. Kov`acs, T. Harko, Thin accretion disks onto brane world black holes , Phys. Rev. D, 78, 084015 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    C.S.J. Pun, Z. Kov`acs, T. Harko, Thin accretion disks in f(R) modified gravity models , Phys. Rev. D, 78, 024043 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne, Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk , Astrophys. J. 191, 499-506 (1974)

    1974

  12. [20]

    K. S. Thorne, Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. II. Evolution of the Hole , Astrophys. J. 191, 507-520 (1974)

    1974

  13. [21]

    S. M. Hoseyni, J. Ghanbari and M. M. Moghaddas, A Study of thin relativistic magnetic accretion disk around a distorted black hole , (2025), arXiv: 2501.07407 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Shu and J

    Y. Shu and J. Huang, Circular orbits and thin accretion disk around a quantum corrected black hole , (2024), arXiv: 2412.05670 [gr-qc]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Liu and J

    S. Liu and J. Huang, Radiative properties of thin accretion disks around rotating short-hairy black holes , (2025), arXiv: 2501.10716 [gr-qc]

    2025

  16. [24]

    Li and X

    Z. Li and X. Guo, Thin Accretion Disk Around Rotating Hairy Black Hole: Radiative Property and Optical Appearance, (2025), arXiv: 2501.01018 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bhattacharyya, A

    S. Bhattacharyya, A. V. Thampan and I. Bombaci, Temperature profiles of accretion discs around rapidly rotating strange stars in general relativity: A comparison with neutron stars , Astron. Astrophys. 372 925 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Torres, Accretion disc onto a static non-baryonic compact object , Nucl

    D. Torres, Accretion disc onto a static non-baryonic compact object , Nucl. Phys. B. 626, 377 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    Y. Yuan, R. Narayan and M. J. Rees, Constraining Alternate Models of Black Holes: Type I X-Ray Bursts on Ac- creting Fermion-Fermion and Boson-Fermion Stars, Astrophys. J. 606, 1112-1124 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0401549. 16

    2004 arXiv

  20. [28]

    F. J. Ernst, New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem , Phys. Rev. 167, 1175 (1968)

    1968

  21. [29]

    F. J. Ernst, New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem. II , Phys. Rev. 168, 1415 (1968)

    1968

  22. [30]

    Astorino, Accelerating and charged type I black holes , Phys

    M. Astorino, Accelerating and charged type I black holes , Phys. Rev. D 108, (2023), 124025; [arXiv:2307.10534 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    G. W. Gibbons, A. H. Mujtaba, and C. N. Pope,Ergoregions in Magnetised Black Hole Spacetimes, Class. Quantum Grav. 30, 125008 (2013), arXiv:1301.3927 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    F. J. Ernst, Black holes in a magnetic universe , J. Math. Phys. 17, 54-56 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    F. J. Ernst and W. Wild, Kerr black holes in a magnetic universe , J. Math. Phys. 17 182-184 (1976)

    1976

  26. [34]

    F. J. Ernst Removal of the nodal singularity of the C-metric , J. Math. Phys. 17, 515-516 (1976)

    1976

  27. [35]

    Astorino, R

    M. Astorino, R. Martelli, and A. Vigan` o, Black holes in a swirling universe , Phys. Rev. D, 106, 064014 (2022), arXiv:2205.13548 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Capobianco, B

    R. Capobianco, B. Hartmann and J. Kunz, Motion of charged particles in an electromagnetic swirling universe: The complete set of solutions , (2024), arXiv:2407.03702 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. Cao, L. Zhang, S. Chen, Q. Pan, and J. Jing, Chaotic motion of particles in the spacetime of a Kerr black hole immersed in swirling universes , (2024), arXiv:2410.03214 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Z. S. Moreira, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and L. C. B. Crispino, Twisting shadows: light rings, lensing and shadows of black holes in swirling universes , (2024), arXiv:2401.05658 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    C. Chen, Q. Pan, and J. Jing, Geometrically thick equilibrium tori around a Schwarzschild black hole in swirling universes, Eur. Phys. J. C 84(10), 1040 (2024), arXiv:2402.02789

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gjorgjieski and R

    K. Gjorgjieski and R. Capobianco, Geometrically Thick Disks around Kerr Black Holes in a Swirling Universe , (2024), arXiv:2405.16758 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. S. Illy, Accelerated Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole in a swirling, magnetic universe, (2023), arXiv:2312.14995 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine and K. Pallikaris, Electromagnetized Black Holes and Swirling Backgrounds in Nonlinear Electrodynamics: The ModMax case , (2024), arXiv:2409.12336 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Astorino and M

    M. Astorino and M. Torresan, Rotating and swirling binary black hole system balanced by its gravitational spin-spin interaction, (2025), arXiv:2502.08706 [gr-qc]

    2025

  36. [44]

    Magnetic

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, I. Kol´ a˘ r, K. M¨ uller, M. Oyarzo, and K. Pallikaris,Mixing“Magnetic” and “Electric” Ehlers-Harrison transformations: The Electromagnetic Swirling Spacetime and Novel Type I Backgrounds , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(7), 724 (2024), arXiv:2401.02924 [gr-qc]

    2024

  37. [45]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, K. M¨ uller, and K. Pallikaris, A new exact rotating spacetime in vacuum: The Kerr-Levi-Civita Spacetime, (2025), arXiv:2506.07166 [gr-qc]

    2025

  38. [46]

    A. D. Pinto, S. Klemm, A. Vigan` o,Kerr-Newman black hole in a Melvin-swirling universe , J. High Energ. Phys. 06, 150 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, in Black Holes , ed. C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt, New York: Gordon and Breach (1973)

    1973

  40. [48]

    S. K. Jha, Superradiance scattering of electromagnetic and gravitational fields and thin accretion disk around non-commutating Kerr black hole , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(10), 1194 (2024), arXiv:2308.14502

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    D. F. Torres, Accretion disc onto a static non-baryonic compact object , Nucl. Phys. B 626, 377 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.