AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality | Paper Citation Record

Observation 96aa2bce-c516-4ff5-84bb-2c14355c25aa · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.582129Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 733df272-384b-426d-acdc-f5aebb136153 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.567254Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 77c89b11-6828-4397-8ccc-6559393a454f · outbound

This paper cites acceptable.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality acceptable

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.552825Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation a9f50ee4-bfc1-47c0-b754-2c14760e9b61 · outbound

This paper cites Let 𝒴 denote the label space of ordinal quality levels, 𝒴 = {𝑟0, 𝑟1, … , 𝑟𝑘, … 𝑟𝐾−1} with 𝑟0 = 0, 𝑟𝑘 = 𝑘, 𝑘 = 1,2, … , 𝐾 − 1, and 𝑟𝐾−1 > ⋯ > 𝑟0.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Let 𝒴 denote the label space of ordinal quality levels, 𝒴 = {𝑟0, 𝑟1, … , 𝑟𝑘, … 𝑟𝐾−1} with 𝑟0 = 0, 𝑟𝑘 = 𝑘, 𝑘 = 1,2, … , 𝐾 − 1, and 𝑟𝐾−1 > ⋯ > 𝑟0

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.538547Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 8db30bf0-6dba-4be4-ba35-4d36c04f0c47 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.524286Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 91885860-e138-4911-a90e-f6cbaffbe296 · outbound

This paper cites accuracy vs. uncertainty.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality accuracy vs. uncertainty

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.509511Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c1d0db06-8c2b-49d6-ad5a-e5e987d0e380 · outbound

This paper cites The CT scans from these patients had slice thickness ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 mm, resolution of 0.9 to 1.5 mm, image size of 512x512 pixels, and 90 to 290 slices per scan.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality The CT scans from these patients had slice thickness ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 mm, resolution of 0.9 to 1.5 mm, image size of 512x512 pixels, and 90 to 290 slices per scan

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.495189Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c45b0705-6ed4-45f7-9b1e-834bc2c55c2f · outbound

This paper cites The model was trained using the Adam optimizer with default hyperparameters ( β1 = 0.9, and β2 = 0.999) over 1 × 105 iterations, leveraging the dice loss function.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality The model was trained using the Adam optimizer with default hyperparameters ( β1 = 0.9, and β2 = 0.999) over 1 × 105 iterations, leveraging the dice loss function

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.479754Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f5612b1b-0fb4-40cb-8645-2238a18b0656 · outbound

This paper cites As shown in Table 2, the ROC AUC values increased from 0.821 to 0.932 and from 0.778 to 0.808 for predicting Class 2 and Class 1 , respectively.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality As shown in Table 2, the ROC AUC values increased from 0.821 to 0.932 and from 0.778 to 0.808 for predicting Class 2 and Class 1 , respectively

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.464364Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 238da2b8-0e55-4580-9246-213b379f863a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.448569Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ba69c9a3-38b9-41ab-bbc9-d30d1bd05a33 · outbound

This paper cites The results indicate an initially positive trend, with accuracy increasing as the sample size grows from 10 to 30.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality The results indicate an initially positive trend, with accuracy increasing as the sample size grows from 10 to 30

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.434200Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation adf9f1dc-9fcc-4268-bfba-aab0dc420070 · outbound

This paper cites This case exhibits high uncertainty for the AI model; please review carefully.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality This case exhibits high uncertainty for the AI model; please review carefully

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.418545Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4199be1b-03a9-4ab9-ae24-d0c751f4f1b4 · outbound

This paper cites Exploring the cancer patients’ experiences during external radiotherap y: A sys- tematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Exploring the cancer patients’ experiences during external radiotherap y: A sys- tematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence,

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.402917Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fde208f4-4f53-429d-b40c-aea158df0627 · outbound

This paper cites Online adaptive radiotherapy potentially reduces toxicity for high-risk prostate cancer treatment,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Online adaptive radiotherapy potentially reduces toxicity for high-risk prostate cancer treatment,

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.789402Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 07bac633-a2cd-4323-9548-edd638dd23ba · outbound

This paper cites Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto -segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto -segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review,

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.415943Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cd3876e5-7974-4756-a1a6-dd1bacb38812 · outbound

This paper cites A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques,

Reference 17

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.750962Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b6d828c7-8159-4ee4-88be-ca1beb72dad6 · outbound

This paper cites Contouring quality assurance methodology based on multiple geometric features against deep learning auto‐segmenta- tion,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Contouring quality assurance methodology based on multiple geometric features against deep learning auto‐segmenta- tion,

Reference 18

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.737137Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3f1a9a4b-7500-4a71-843a-afba193f9033 · outbound

This paper cites Comprehensive Clinical Usability-Oriented Contour Quality Evaluation for Deep Learning Auto-segmentation: Com- bining Multiple Quantitative Metrics Through Machine Learning,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Comprehensive Clinical Usability-Oriented Contour Quality Evaluation for Deep Learning Auto-segmentation: Com- bining Multiple Quantitative Metrics Through Machine Learning,

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.722458Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d9c5cf5c-ffc8-4994-8732-d9a704afa5eb · outbound

This paper cites Automated Quality Assurance of OAR Contouring for Lung Cancer Based on Segmentation With Deep Active Learning,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Automated Quality Assurance of OAR Contouring for Lung Cancer Based on Segmentation With Deep Active Learning,

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.276748Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 6c90ae25-4736-4b50-8577-0d13a2e20720 · outbound

This paper cites CNN-Based Quality Assurance for Automatic Segmentation of Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality CNN-Based Quality Assurance for Automatic Segmentation of Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy,

Reference 21

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.202639Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d9ea6099-9c0b-4f78-841e-5738ed520726 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty Assessment for Deep Learning Radiotherapy Applications,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty Assessment for Deep Learning Radiotherapy Applications,

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.705562Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 29190f34-4888-48ff-96e7-cb9a8a67f946 · outbound

This paper cites Towards reliable head and neck cancers locoregional recurrence prediction using delta-radiomics and learning with rejection option,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Towards reliable head and neck cancers locoregional recurrence prediction using delta-radiomics and learning with rejection option,

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.690683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1164cc73-d705-48fe-9e1c-ac9e73661887 · outbound

This paper cites Predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal cancer by using a convolutional neural network with associated epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal cancer by using a convolutional neural network with associated epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty,

Reference 24

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.676330Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e46d62d8-398a-4f52-b3f7-ca4945aaaae8 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty estimations methods for a deep learning model to aid in clinical decision -making – a clinician’s perspective.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty estimations methods for a deep learning model to aid in clinical decision -making – a clinician’s perspective

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.402788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 5319980e-39fb-4f78-8f60-249443db0bac · outbound

This paper cites A deep learning-based framework for segmenting invisible clinical target volumes with estimated uncertainties for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality A deep learning-based framework for segmenting invisible clinical target volumes with estimated uncertainties for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy,

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.459161Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2a9274e4-05e6-4b88-a667-520785d91739 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty quantification using Bayesian neural networks in classification: Applica- tion to biomedical image segmentation,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty quantification using Bayesian neural networks in classification: Applica- tion to biomedical image segmentation,

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.463570Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 25025d6e-f6ef-4cbd-be8f-49570f3ca835 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty-driven Sanity Check: Application to Postoperative Brain Tumor Cavity Segmentation.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty-driven Sanity Check: Application to Postoperative Brain Tumor Cavity Segmentation

Reference 28

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.000711Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e32d8eaf-2d89-4402-9518-019b082d4192 · outbound

This paper cites Using Spatial Probability Maps to Hi ghlight Potential Inaccuracies in Deep Learning -Based Contours: Facilitating Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy - ClinicalKey.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Using Spatial Probability Maps to Hi ghlight Potential Inaccuracies in Deep Learning -Based Contours: Facilitating Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy - ClinicalKey

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.388639Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 460965ec-15f4-4082-9b3b-4328a482bc52 · outbound

This paper cites A comparison of Monte Carlo dropout and bootstrap aggregation on the performance and uncertainty estimation in radiation therapy dose prediction with deep learning neural networks,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality A comparison of Monte Carlo dropout and bootstrap aggregation on the performance and uncertainty estimation in radiation therapy dose prediction with deep learning neural networks,

Reference 30

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.661584Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation bac330c3-c891-432c-a617-3e9a216ceef0 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty in Multitask Learning: Joint Representations for Probabilistic MR -only Radiotherapy Planning,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty in Multitask Learning: Joint Representations for Probabilistic MR -only Radiotherapy Planning,

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.646154Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 62dd886c-be21-446c-81a7-cd01f26fe8b4 · outbound

This paper cites Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: A review,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: A review,

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.487899Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d203e477-1e68-4c0a-821b-10ec8ec84cd8 · outbound

This paper cites Deep Generative Model for Synthetic-CT Generation with Uncertainty Predictions,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Deep Generative Model for Synthetic-CT Generation with Uncertainty Predictions,

Reference 33

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.492586Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 76709ee2-bd46-4e86-a1f8-24f0bdda3024 · outbound

This paper cites Uncertainty in Deep Learning,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Uncertainty in Deep Learning,

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.374418Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 59d1019e-1f39-46e4-9590-99ae1d1763b4 · outbound

This paper cites Deep neural networks for rank -consistent ordinal regression based on conditional probabilities,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Deep neural networks for rank -consistent ordinal regression based on conditional probabilities,

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.501547Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4448e811-beac-4dec-a861-546bdc48974e · outbound

This paper cites Clinical evaluation of a deep learning segmentation model including manual adjustments afterwards for locally advanced breast cancer,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Clinical evaluation of a deep learning segmentation model including manual adjustments afterwards for locally advanced breast cancer,

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.505847Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation eb6bea7f-b8d7-4012-9f16-8eed5fbcd633 · outbound

This paper cites Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is ‘Clinically Acceptable’?,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is ‘Clinically Acceptable’?,

Reference 37

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.510053Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c2cca623-9652-4721-9fef-5cd333fefba2 · outbound

This paper cites Incremental retraining, clinical implementation, and acceptance rate of deep learning auto‐segmentation for male pelvis in a multiuser environment,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Incremental retraining, clinical implementation, and acceptance rate of deep learning auto‐segmentation for male pelvis in a multiuser environment,

Reference 38

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.591636Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 414699b1-e49c-4bda-a671-5de177a283be · outbound

This paper cites Evaluating the clinical acceptability of deep learning contours of prostate and organs -at-risk in an automated prostate treatment planning process,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Evaluating the clinical acceptability of deep learning contours of prostate and organs -at-risk in an automated prostate treatment planning process,

Reference 39

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.775177Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f0d21906-4075-4356-95a9-b8a1a0f686ba · outbound

This paper cites Clinical implementation of deep learning contour autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Clinical implementation of deep learning contour autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy,

Reference 40

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.575800Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation edcc2827-6456-4413-948e-19ab0990a5f0 · outbound

This paper cites Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy

Reference 41

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.526953Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4a8c7315-f0ea-4c13-b8c9-8f6657944e7c · outbound

This paper cites A systematic review of deep learning data augmentation in medical imaging: Recent advances and future research directions,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality A systematic review of deep learning data augmentation in medical imaging: Recent advances and future research directions,

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:37.532150Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6df1cd47-4158-4881-96df-b55ca7e10c23 · outbound

This paper cites Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning,.

AI-Assisted Decision-Making for Clinical Assessment of Auto-Segmented Contour Quality Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning,

Reference 43

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T04:49:38.359492Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Coverage vector

Reference resolution

Outbound references

Pith citing papers