Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 80 references

Prospects for Ultralow-Mass Nuclear Magnetic Resonance using Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that negatively charged boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride could outperform diamond NV centers by over an order of magnitude in nanoscale NMR, because the layered material lets the sensing defect sit roughly one…

desk verdict Solid sensitivity-engineering blueprint for V_B^- NMR; the order-of-magnitude SNR headline is conditional on combining record parameters that no single sample has yet shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00383 v1 pith:44PBXTTR submitted 2025-05-01 quant-ph physics.app-ph

Declan M. Daly , Niko R. Reed , Stephen J. DeVience , Zechuan Yin , Johannes Cremer , Andrew J. Beling , John W. Blanchard , Ronald L. Walsworth This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.app-ph
keywords nuclearmagneticresonancehexagonalboronnitridevacancyNVcenterquantumsensingstatisticalpolarizationnanoscaleNMRACmagnetometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper makes a quantitative case that negatively charged boron vacancies ($V_B^-$) in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) could become the leading quantum sensor for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) on ultralow-mass samples, surpassing nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. The core advantage is standoff distance: hBN has no dangling bonds at its surface, so $V_B^-$ defects can be stable about 1 nm from a sample, whereas NV centers degrade within about 10 nm of a diamond surface. Because dipolar coupling falls as the cube of distance, this difference converts into a projected signal-to-noise advantage of over an order of magnitude for statistically polarized nanoscale samples when the best separately reported $V_B^-$ parameters are combined. The paper also finds a geometric advantage for $V_B^-$ in micron-scale, high-field longitudinal NMR detection. The result is a design study, not a demonstration: it proposes pulse sequences, sample confinement in hBN nanowells, and sensitivity calculations intended to guide experiments.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the $V_B^-$ defect itself, a spin-1, optically initialized and read out electronic spin in hexagonal boron nitride that can sit within about one nanometer of the sample surface because the van der Waals surface is free of the paramagnetic noise that degrades shallow diamond NVs. Its advantage is quantified by two scaling relations. For statistically polarized nanoscale samples, the root-mean-square AC signal at the sensor scales as $B_{\mathrm{rms}}^2 \propto \rho G(\alpha)/d_r^3$, where $d_r$ is defect depth and $G(\alpha)=8-3\sin^4\alpha$ is the geometry factor; the small $d_r$ of $V_B^-$ drives the large projected SNR. For uniformly polarized micron-scale samples, the longitudinal-detection geometry factor $G_{\mathrm{longitudinal}}=\pi(\cos 2\alpha+1/3)$ is maximal for $V_B^-$ ($\alpha=0$) and nearly vanishing for the common NV orientation ($\alpha\approx 54.7^\circ$). The sensitivity framework also optimizes optical readout time and dynamical-decoupling pulse number per signal frequency, showing that at MHz frequencies the coherence penalty $\exp(-\tau_{\mathrm{full}}/(kT_2)^p)$ saturates, so $T_2$ is not the dominant term.

What would settle it

Construct a nanowell in hBN with a shallow $V_B^-$ ensemble at about 2.5 nm depth and measure the statistically polarized proton NMR signal from water with an XY8-k sequence; repeat the same measurement with a 10 nm deep shallow NV ensemble under identical accumulation time and proton density. If the $V_B^-$/NV SNR ratio does not approach the order-of-magnitude improvement predicted by the aggregated parameters at a signal frequency near 1 MHz, then those parameters are not simultaneously realizable in one sensor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $V_B^-$ ensembles in hBN can outperform NV centers for nanoscale NMR, with the paper's model predicting SNR that could surpass NV performance by over an order of magnitude in the statistical-polarization regime. Using an AC-sensitivity model for dynamical decoupling protocols, the paper compares three NV systems (single nanopillar NV, shallow NV ensemble, bulk NV ensemble) with two $V_B^-$ parameter sets. A set assembled from the best reported $V_B^-$ values ($T_2 = 2\,\mu$s Hahn echo, 18% AC photoluminescence contrast, 6000 detected counts per defect per second, 236 ppm defect density, 2.5 nm depth) gives AC sensitivity comparable to or better than single and shallow NVs, and the shallow depth gives it the highest nanoscale NMR SNR. At MHz-scale signal frequencies, the model finds sensor coherence time matters less than defect density, photoluminescence brightness, contrast, and achievable Rabi frequency, which helps $V_B^-$ compete despite short $T_2$. For micron-scale samples with uniform polarization, $V_B^-$ is poorly suited to transverse-detection protocols such as CASR because its quantization axis gives zero geometry factor, but it is optimally suited to longitudinal-detection protocols, with geometry factor $G = 4\pi/3$ versus near zero for common NV orientations.

Load-bearing premise

The projected order-of-magnitude SNR advantage assumes one shallow hBN sensor can simultaneously combine $T_2 = 2\,\mu$s Hahn echo coherence, 18% photoluminescence contrast, roughly 6000 detected photons per defect per second from a 600$\times$ plasmonic enhancement, and 236 ppm defect density, even though these values were measured on different samples and high defect density would itself shorten $T_2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the aggregated $V_B^-$ parameters are realizable in one device, nanoscale NMR on statistically polarized samples down to a few thousand nuclear spins could be performed with an order-of-magnitude better SNR than shallow NV ensembles, bringing ultralow-mass samples such as single-cell metabolites or 2D material adsorbates into reach.
  • At signal frequencies above about 1 MHz, the model implies that improving $V_B^-$ defect density, optical contrast, and readout brightness matters more than extending $T_2$, so near-term materials work should focus on dense, bright, high-contrast hBN layers.
  • For micron-scale high-field NMR, $V_B^-$ ensembles should be used with longitudinal detection protocols such as AERIS or DRACAERIS rather than CASR-like transverse detection, where the $V_B^-$ geometry factor is zero.
  • Liquid samples confined in hBN nanowells, where the measured diffusion coefficient drops to about 0.038 nm^2/s, would experience almost no diffusion broadening, making high-resolution nanoscale $V_B^-$ NMR feasible.
  • Back-action between dense $V_B^-$ spins and near-surface sample nuclei will shift and broaden NMR lines, up to roughly 10 kHz for dense ensembles, so spectral interpretation must include these effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the standoff advantage should be even more pronounced for thin-film or two-dimensional samples, because the paper's thin-layer SNR model makes the signal depend on $1/d_r^3 - 1/(d_r+h)^3$; a $V_B^-$ layer under an encapsulated monolayer would see a much larger fraction of the sample's spins than a 10 nm deep NV sees.
  • Editorial inference: if the unknown variation in $V_B^-$ $T_2$ is traced to charge-state or irradiation-damage effects, isotope-enriched hBN with controlled annealing might push coherence well beyond the $2\,\mu$s used here; the paper notes the variability but does not claim such a fix.
  • Editorial inference: the simulated spin-state-dependent back-action splittings at 1 to 2 nm standoff suggest a route to single-nucleus spectroscopy on external samples, extending NV-based nuclear-spin-cluster imaging to molecules on hBN; the paper identifies this as future work rather than a demonstrated capability.
  • Editorial inference: a direct head-to-head experiment comparing a shallow $V_B^-$ ensemble and a 10 nm shallow NV ensemble on identical statistically polarized protons would settle whether the order-of-magnitude claim survives simultaneous realization of all aggregated parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a modeling and design study of negatively charged boron vacancy (V_B^-) spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) as a sensor for nanoscale and micron-scale nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). It adapts a published NV AC-magnetometry sensitivity model (Eq. 1) to V_B^-, introduces optimized readout times and XY8-k pulse counts, and compares two V_B^- parameter sets ('V_B^- Gao' and 'V_B^- Aggregated') against single, shallow, and bulk NV ensembles. The authors also analyze sensor-sample back-action, diffusion effects with nanowell confinement, and longitudinal (AERIS/DRACAERIS) detection geometries. The central claim is that the shallow standoff of V_B^- defects gives a large SNR advantage for statistically polarized nanoscale NMR, potentially surpassing NV performance by over an order of magnitude, with a complementary geometric advantage for high-field longitudinal detection.

Significance. If the projected performance were realized in a single device, the paper would identify a materially new direction for nanoscale NMR: a van der Waals host with ~1 nm standoff and dense ensembles, combined with a longitudinal geometry advantage. The study is useful as a roadmap and benchmarks many parameters; it is transparent about the optimistic nature of its aggregated parameter set, and the code and data are made available (Secs. VI-VII), which is a strength. The main significance is prospective rather than established: the headline SNR advantage is not experimentally demonstrated and depends on the simultaneous realization of record values from several different samples. The back-action and diffusion analyses go beyond a simple scaling estimate and are themselves valuable contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Table II] The order-of-magnitude SNR claim is computed entirely from the 'V_B^- Aggregated' row of Table II, which combines record values from different samples: Hahn T2 = 2 µs [24], 18% AC contrast [40], 6000 detected counts/s/defect from a ~600x plasmonic enhancement [37,71], and 236 ppm density [41]. The paper itself notes in Section V that V_B^- T2 'varies considerably with unknown cause,' and Ref. [41] studies strongly interacting high-density spin defects, so the independent combination of high density, long T2, and high contrast is not established. This is load-bearing because the non-aggregated 'V_B^- Gao' set is stated to give only NV-comparable SNR; please provide a feasibility argument or explicitly reframe the claim as an upper-bound target rather than a projection.
  2. [Table II, Supplementary Note 1] Table II lists a 2.5 nm depth for both V_B^- parameter sets, but Supplementary Note 1 infers the V_B^- defects from Ref. [35] to be spread over a ~25 nm depth range on the basis of SRIM simulations, and the brightness estimate averages over that range. Because the statistical-polarization SNR in Eq. (3) scales as d^{-3/2} and the sensitivity model is volume-normalized, the shallow-depth advantage is very sensitive to this assumption; the manuscript should justify that a majority of the sensing ensemble can be placed at ~2.5 nm, or quantify the SNR reduction for a realistic depth distribution.
  3. [Section IV.A, Supplementary Fig. S7] Section IV.A and Supplementary Fig. S7 show that a dense 236 ppm V_B^- ensemble produces back-action-induced frequency shifts of ~10 kHz and line broadening of ~0.8–1 kHz at 1–5 nm depths, which is comparable to or larger than the NMR linewidths targeted for chemical identification. The manuscript acknowledges these effects but does not quantify their impact on the SNR advantage claimed in Section V; this should be addressed because the same high density is one of the inputs to the aggregated parameter set.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table II] The header 'Max T2, dynamic decoupling (µm)' appears to have the wrong unit; the values listed (4.4, 50, 45.6, 77) are in microseconds.
  2. [Supplementary Note 1] There is a typo in Supplementary Note 1: 'magntiude' should be 'magnitude'.
  3. [Figure S8 caption] The caption contains the corrupted text 'Unmodi/f_ied'; it should read 'Unmodified'.
  4. [Section IV.B, Fig. 7 caption] The statement 'D is experimentally measured to be ≈ 118 s[28]' is missing units for the diffusion coefficient, and the value should be given with appropriate units (e.g., nm²/s).
  5. [Section III, Supplementary Note 3] The main text writes 'G = 4/3π' for the longitudinal geometry factor; given Eq. (S8) with α=0, the intended expression is 4π/3, and the notation should be made unambiguous.
  6. [Reference [65]] Reference [65] is incomplete: it lacks author names and a full title, appearing as 'The composition and structure of the ubiquitous hydrocarbon contamination on van der Waals materials, , 21 (2022)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the V_B^- SNR projection follows from an explicit, independently sourced parameter set applied to a standard sensitivity model, not from fitting the target claim.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The paper computes AC sensitivity from the standard NV sensitivity expression (Eq. 1, after Ref. [33]) and the statistical-polarization SNR from Eq. 3 = Eq. S10, which combines Eq. 1 with the dipolar Brms formula Eq. S9 from Refs. [16,17]. The V_B^- advantage is not obtained by fitting any parameter to a target SNR: Table II lists independently published or explicitly estimated values for T2, contrast, PL counts, density, and depth, and the Section V 'over an order of magnitude' statement follows algebraically from Eq. 3 with d=2.5 nm vs 10 nm and the Table II sensitivities. The 'V_B^- Aggregated' row is an explicitly labeled optimistic combination from Refs. [24,37,40,41], not a back-fit to the predicted SNR. Some sources are authored by present group members (Refs. [16,32,33,49,72]), but these are external published methods and measured data, not results whose content is the claimed V_B^- NMR advantage; no 'uniqueness theorem' or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The manuscript's own caveat that V_B^- T2 'varies considerably with unknown cause' and that standardization is needed is a parameter-realizability risk and a stated limitation, not circularity. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citation chain, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central projection rests on a small set of literature-derived parameters and the assumption that they can coexist in one device. The mathematics is not circular, and no new physical entities are introduced, but the output SNR is essentially a mapping of the input parameter choices.

free parameters (11)
  • V_B^- Hahn echo T2 = 2 us (Aggregated); 1.1 us (Gao)
    Coherence time input to Eq. 1; drives the exponential decoherence penalty. T2 varies widely across hBN samples with unknown cause, as the paper notes.
  • V_B^- maximum dynamic decoupling T2 = 4.4 us
    Caps k_opt in Eq. 2 and limits high-frequency sensitivity; taken from ref. [39].
  • V_B^- defect depth = 2.5 nm
    Standoff distance enters SNR as d^-3 in Eq. 3; this is the main source of the claimed advantage over NV centers.
  • V_B^- AC PL contrast = 18% (Aggregated); 4.25% (Gao)
    Contrast C enters Eq. 1 and the statistical-polarization signal contrast; the 18% value is from ref. [40], not from the same sample as the other Aggregated parameters.
  • Detected PL counts per V_B^- defect = 6000 Hz (Aggregated); 87.5 Hz (Gao)
    Single-emitter brightness has not been measured directly; the Aggregated value assumes a 600x plasmonic enhancement applied to an estimated unenhanced 9.4 cps/defect.
  • V_B^- defect density = 236 ppm (Aggregated); 192 ppm (Gao)
    Sets N in Eq. 1 and inter-defect spacing; 192 ppm is interpolated from fluence data in ref. [41] using a log fit.
  • s, coherence scaling exponent = 0.52
    Controls k_opt in Eq. 2; taken from ref. [21] and applied to both V_B^- parameter sets.
  • p, stretched exponential parameter = 1
    Assumed value in Eq. 1; no V_B^- specific measurement is cited.
  • Initialization time t_I = 100 ns
    Overhead time in Eq. 1; affects optimized readout and sensitivity at high frequency.
  • Sample proton density rho = 64 nm^-3 (Fig. 5), 2.95 nm^-3 (Fig. 7), 1 nm^-3 (Fig. 7 inset)
    Chosen model sample densities; SNR and lineshape results scale with sqrt(rho), so the numerical projections depend on these inputs.
  • Nanowell diffusion coefficient = 0.038 nm^2/s
    Adopted from single-platinum-ion TEM tracking in ref. [28] and used to argue diffusion broadening is negligible; assumes this value transfers to the proposed liquid NMR samples.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The NV-center AC sensitivity model, Eq. 1, and the k_opt formula, Eq. 2, apply to V_B^- defects with the same shot-noise and projection-noise dynamics.
    The paper asserts the underlying physical mechanisms are similar, but V_B^- has different optical cycling, charge dynamics, and coherence properties; no direct validation of Eq. 1 for V_B^- is provided.
  • domain assumption Statistically polarized nanoscale sample signals are described by the B_rms model of ref. [16] with geometry factor G(alpha) = 8 - 3 sin^4(alpha).
    The SNR scaling in Eq. 3 and the geometry comparisons in Fig. S6 inherit this published model, which was developed for shallow NV centers and is assumed valid for V_B^- at 1-2 nm standoff.
  • domain assumption V_B^- defects are stable at about 1 nm from the hBN surface, and the surface does not degrade their spin or optical properties.
    This is central to the standoff advantage; ref. [23] supports few-layer flakes, but stability at 1 nm in a fabricated nanowell stack with plasmonic structures is not demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper The best measured values of T2, PL contrast, brightness, and density can be combined independently in one 'V_B^- Aggregated' system.
    Table II constructs a hypothetical best-case sensor from separate publications; parameter independence is not physically guaranteed and is the paper's own acknowledged optimistic choice.
  • domain assumption Back-action simulations assume the sensor spin is in the superposition (|+1> + |0>)/sqrt(2), the maximum broadening case.
    The paper notes broadening would be absent in the |0> state, so the simulated lineshapes are a worst-case bound that may not describe a given measurement protocol.
  • domain assumption Boron and nitrogen spins in the hBN host do not contribute significant background V_B^- NMR signal because their gyromagnetic ratios differ from target nuclei.
    Stated in Section IV; different Larmor frequencies reduce spectral overlap but do not eliminate all background effects, especially under strong back-action.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prospects for Ultralow-Mass Nuclear Magnetic Resonance using Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/44PBXTTR

@misc{pith2026250500383,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prospects for Ultralow-Mass Nuclear Magnetic Resonance using Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/44PBXTTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00383}
}
abstract

Optically active quantum defects in solids, such as the nitrogen vacancy (NV) center in diamond, are a leading modality for micron-scale and nanoscale (ultralow-mass) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging under ambient conditions. However, the spin and optical properties of NV centers degrade when closer than about 10 nm from the diamond surface, limiting NMR sensitivity as well as spectral and spatial resolution. Here we outline efforts to develop an alternative nanoscale NMR sensor using the negatively charged boron vacancy ($V_B^-$) in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). As a van der Waals material, hBN's surface is free from dangling bonds and other sources of paramagnetic noise that degrade the performance of near surface NVs, allowing stable $V_B^-$ defects to exist $\sim1\,$nm from the material surface. We discuss the properties of boron vacancies as they apply to narrowband (AC) magnetic field sensing and outline experimental designs optimized for this system. We propose measurement protocols for $V_B^-$ NMR for both statistically and uniformly polarized samples at the nano- and micron-scales, including relevant pulse sequences, sensitivity calculations, and sample confinement strategies; and compare the expected performance to NV-NMR. We estimate back-action effects between the $V_B^-$ electronic spins and the sample nuclear spins at the nanoscale; and account for unconventional diffusion dynamics in the flow-restricted nanoscale regime, calculating its effects on the expected $V_B^-$ NMR signal. Lastly, we identify potential sample targets and operational regimes best suited for both nanoscale and micron-scale $V_B^-$ NMR.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00383 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Atomic structure of the boron vacancy defect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Proposed experimental design for nanoscale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Volume-normalized AC sensitivity vs. AC signal frequency for three NV and two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Geometry scaling factor calculations for transverse and longitudinal AC signals demonstrate the effect of defect angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Model calculations of differences between NV and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulated NMR linewidth scales as a power law with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Model calculation of nanoscale NMR lineshapes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [110]

    diamond from Element Six. NV centers are created with 6 keV 14N+ irradiation at a dose of 2 ×1013 cm−2 13 Contrast (at 10 MHz line width) 15% - 27% Saturation count rate (0.75 NA) 0.6 - 1.2 MCts/s Nominal NV depth 10 nm T2/T2* (single Hahn echo/XY) 4 - 1 µs (average values) Nominal cw-ODMR sensitivity (Q2-Q8) 1 - 7 µT/sqrt(Hz) Brightness (at max. contrast...

    work page

  2. [24]

    Aslam, M

    N. Aslam, M. Pfender, P. Neumann, R. Reuter, A. Zappe, F. F´ avaro de Oliveira, A. Denisenko, H. Sumiya, S. On- oda, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, Nanoscale nuclear mag- netic resonance with chemical resolution, Science 357, 67 (2017)

    2017

  3. [40]

    W. Lee, V. S. Liu, Z. Zhang, S. Kim, R. Gong, X. Du, K. Pham, T. Poirier, Z. Hao, J. H. Edgar, P. Kim, C. Zu, E. J. Davis, and N. Y. Yao, Intrinsic High-Fidelity Spin Polarization of Charged Vacancies in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Physical Review Letters 134, 096202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [41]

    We use a log fit for the interpolation, and estimate that a fluence of 3 He + nm−2 would produce a V− B density of 192 ppm

    using 3 keV He+ ions, at 0.3, 1.1, and 10 He+ nm−2. We use a log fit for the interpolation, and estimate that a fluence of 3 He + nm−2 would produce a V− B density of 192 ppm. To estimate the brightness of the emitters in [35], we calculate the diameter of the spot size based on the re- ported NA (0.9) and wavelength (532 nm) using the ap- proximation d =...

    work page

  5. [35]

    fluence data from [41]

    by interpolating the reported V− B density vs. fluence data from [41]. Both works used He+ irradiation to create vacancies (and thusV− B defects), with [35] using 2.5 keV He+ ions for irradiation at a dose of 3 He + nm−2 and

    work page

  6. [1]

    The diamond measures (2 × 2× 0.5)-mm3, is side polished, and contains a 10 µm thick nitrogen-15 rich layer grown along the [110] crystal ori- entation

    “Bulk NV” Parameters The bulk NV diamond sample used in this work is a high-purity (> 99.99% 12C), CVD-grown diamond plate from Element Six. The diamond measures (2 × 2× 0.5)-mm3, is side polished, and contains a 10 µm thick nitrogen-15 rich layer grown along the [110] crystal ori- entation. Post-growth treatment through electron irradi- ation and anneali...

    work page

  7. [2]

    Shallow NV

    “Shallow NV” Parameters The diamond used to determine “Shallow NV” param- eters is a CVD grown, isotopically purified (99.6% 12C)

    work page

  8. [3]

    V− B Aggregated

    discussed above, which is consistent with the plas- monic enhancement from the gold stripline used in [35]. Note that the density of hBN is not isotropic, as the spacing between lattice sites within each layer is sub- stantially smaller than the inter-layer spacing [70]. For the purpose of the volume-normalized AC sensitivity esti- mates presented in Figu...

    work page

Show all 80 references
  1. [4]

    R. J. Abraham, J. Fisher, P. Loftus, and R. J. Abraham, Introduction to NMR spectroscopy (Wiley, Chichester ; New York, 1988)

    1988

  2. [5]

    Z. Ali, D. P. Poenar, and S. Aditya, Design of planar microcoil-based NMR probe ensuring high SNR, AIP Ad- vances 7, 095107 (2017)

    2017

  3. [6]

    B. E. Herzog, D. Cadeddu, F. Xue, P. Peddibhotla, and M. Poggio, Boundary between the thermal and statistical polarization regimes in a nuclear spin ensemble, Applied Physics Letters 105, 043112 (2014)

    2014

  4. [7]

    Single NV

    “Single NV” Parameters Single NV parameters are based on typical values re- ported by QZabre Ltd [38] for their single NV scanning tips (Table S1). For the purpose of this paper, we select the value within each range that predicts the best sensi- tivity. The exponential scalin...

  5. [8]

    Theillet, In-Cell Structural Biology by NMR: The Benefits of the Atomic Scale, Chemical Reviews 122, 9497 (2022)

    F.-X. Theillet, In-Cell Structural Biology by NMR: The Benefits of the Atomic Scale, Chemical Reviews 122, 9497 (2022)

    2022

  6. [9]

    D. S. Wishart, L. L. Cheng, V. Copi´ e, A. S. Edison, H. R. Eghbalnia, J. C. Hoch, G. J. Gouveia, W. Path- masiri, R. Powers, T. B. Schock, L. W. Sumner, and M. Uchimiya, NMR and Metabolomics—A Roadmap for the Future, Metabolites 12, 678 (2022)

    2022

  7. [10]

    Jonas, S

    E. Jonas, S. Kuhn, and N. Schl¨ orer, Prediction of chem- ical shift in NMR: A review, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 60, 1021 (2022)

    2022

  8. [11]

    A. M. Wolters, D. A. Jayawickrama, and J. V. Sweedler, Microscale NMR, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 6, 711

  9. [12]

    H. J. Mamin, M. Kim, M. H. Sherwood, C. T. Rettner, K. Ohno, D. D. Awschalom, and D. Rugar, Nanoscale Nuclear Magnetic Resonance with a Nitrogen-Vacancy Spin Sensor, Science 339, 557 (2013)

    2013

  10. [13]

    Staudacher, F

    T. Staudacher, F. Shi, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, J. Du, C. A. Meriles, F. Reinhard, and J. Wrachtrup, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy on a (5-Nanometer)3 Sample Volume, Science 339, 561 (2013)

    2013

  11. [14]

    Grisi, F

    M. Grisi, F. Vincent, B. Volpe, R. Guidetti, N. Harris, A. Beck, and G. Boero, NMR spectroscopy of single sub- nL ova with inductive ultra-compact single-chip probes, Scientific Reports 7, 44670 (2017)

    2017

  12. [15]

    A. J. Rossini, A. Zagdoun, M. Lelli, A. Lesage, C. Cop´ eret, and L. Emsley, Dynamic nuclear polarization surface enhanced nmr spectroscopy, Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1942 (2013)

    2013

  13. [16]

    B. J. Walder, C. Berk, W.-C. Liao, A. J. Rossini, M. Schwarzw¨ alder, U. Pradere, J. Hall, A. Lesage, C. Cop´ eret, and L. Emsley, One- and two-dimensional high-resolution nmr from flat surfaces, ACS Central Sci- ence 5, 515 (2019)

    2019

  14. [17]

    Molinski, NMR of natural products at the ‘nanomole- scale’, Natural Product Reports 27, 321

    T. Molinski, NMR of natural products at the ‘nanomole- scale’, Natural Product Reports 27, 321

  15. [18]

    Bruckmaier, R

    F. Bruckmaier, R. D. Allert, N. R. Neuling, P. Amrein, S. Littin, K. D. Briegel, P. Sch¨ atzle, P. Knittel, M. Za- itsev, and D. B. Bucher, Imaging local diffusion in mi- crostructures using NV-based pulsed field gradient NMR, Science Advances 9, eadh3484 (2023)

    2023

  16. [19]

    D. B. Bucher, D. R. Glenn, H. Park, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, Hyperpolarization-Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy with Femtomole Sensitivity Using Quan- tum Defects in Diamond, Physical Review X 10, 021053 (2020)

    2020

  17. [20]

    Schwartz, J

    I. Schwartz, J. Rosskopf, S. Schmitt, B. Tratzmiller, Q. Chen, L. P. McGuinness, F. Jelezko, and M. B. Ple- nio, Blueprint for nanoscale NMR, Scientific Reports 9, 6938 (2019), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2019

  18. [21]

    Lovchinsky, A

    I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K. De Greve, R. Evans, R. Gertner, E. Bersin, C. M¨ uller, L. McGuinness, F. Jelezko, R. L. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quan...

    2016

  19. [22]

    D. R. Glenn, D. B. Bucher, J. Lee, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, and R. L. Walsworth, High-resolution magnetic reso- nance spectroscopy using a solid-state spin sensor, Na- ture 555, 351 (2018)

    2018

  20. [23]

    L. M. Pham, S. J. DeVience, F. Casola, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Bersin, J. Lee, E. Urbach, P. Cappel- laro, H. Park, A. Yacoby, M. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, NMR technique for determining the depth of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Physical Review B 93, ...

    2016

  21. [25]

    S. H. Kim, K. H. Park, Y. G. Lee, S. J. Kang, Y. Park, and Y. D. Kim, Color Centers in Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride, Nanomaterials 13, 2344 (2023)

    2023

  22. [26]

    Seitz, P

    M. Seitz, P. Gant, A. Castellanos-Gomez, and F. Prins, Long-Term Stabilization of Two-Dimensional Perovskites by Encapsulation with Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Nano- materials 9, 1120 (2019)

    2019

  23. [27]

    Huang, Y

    W. Huang, Y. Zhang, M. Song, B. Wang, H. Hou, X. Hu, X. Chen, and T. Zhai, Encapsulation strategies on 2D materials for field effect transistors and photodetectors, Chinese Chemical Letters 33, 2281 (2022)

    2022

  24. [28]

    Rizzato, M

    R. Rizzato, M. Schalk, S. Mohr, J. C. Hermann, J. P. Leibold, F. Bruckmaier, G. Salvitti, C. Qian, P. Ji, G. V. Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, A. V. Stier, J. J. Fin- ley, and D. B. Bucher, Extending the coherence of spin defects in hBN enables advanced qubit control and quan-...

    2023

  25. [29]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, and T. Li, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexag- onal boron nitride, Advances in Physics: X 8, 2206049 (2023)

    2023

  26. [30]

    Durand, T

    A. Durand, T. Clua-Provost, F. Fabre, P. Kumar, J. Li, J. Edgar, P. Udvarhelyi, A. Gali, X. Marie, C. Robert, J. G´ erard, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, and V. Jacques, Opti- cally Active Spin Defects in Few-Layer Thick Hexago- nal Boron Nitride, Physical Review Letters 131, 116902 (2023)

    2023

  27. [31]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, A. Sper- lich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Science Advances 7, eabf3630 (2021)

    2021

  28. [32]

    D. Daly, S. J. DeVience, E. Huckestein, J. W. Blan- chard, J. Cremer, and R. L. Walsworth, Nutation-based longitudinal-sensing protocols for high-field NMR with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Physical Review Applied 22, 024043 (2024)

    2024

  29. [33]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity op- timization for NV-diamond magnetometry, Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  30. [34]

    Bauch, C

    E. Bauch, C. A. Hart, J. M. Schloss, M. J. Turner, J. F. Barry, P. Kehayias, S. Singh, and R. L. Walsworth, Ultra- long Dephasing Times in Solid-State Spin Ensembles via Quantum Control, Physical Review X 8, 031025 (2018)

    2018

  31. [36]

    Clark, D

    N. Clark, D. J. Kelly, M. Zhou, Y.-C. Zou, C. W. Myung, D. G. Hopkinson, C. Schran, A. Michaelides, R. Gor- bachev, and S. J. Haigh, Tracking single adatoms in liq- uid in a transmission electron microscope, Nature 609, 942 (2022)

    2022

  32. [37]

    Keerthi, S

    A. Keerthi, S. Goutham, Y. You, P. Iamprasertkun, R. A. W. Dryfe, A. K. Geim, and B. Radha, Water fric- tion in nanofluidic channels made from two-dimensional 24 crystals, Nature Communications 12, 3092 (2021)

    2021

  33. [38]

    Pagliero, R

    D. Pagliero, R. Khan, K. Elkaduwe, A. Bhardwaj, K. Xu, A. Wolcott, G. L´ opez, B. Radha, N. Giovambattista, and C. A. Meriles, Slow water in engineered nano- channels revealed by color-center-enabled sensing, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2412.18969 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [39]

    Munuera-Javaloy, A

    C. Munuera-Javaloy, A. Tobalina, and J. Casanova, High- Resolution NMR Spectroscopy at Large Fields with Ni- trogen Vacancy Centers, Physical Review Letters 130, 133603 (2023)

    2023

  35. [42]

    X. Gao, B. Jiang, A. E. Llacsahuanga Allcca, K. Shen, M. A. Sadi, A. B. Solanki, P. Ju, Z. Xu, P. Upad- hyaya, Y. P. Chen, S. A. Bhave, and T. Li, High-Contrast Plasmonic-Enhanced Shallow Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride for Quantum Sensing, Nano Letters 21, 7708 (2021)

    2021

  36. [43]

    R. Gong, X. Du, E. Janzen, V. Liu, Z. Liu, G. He, B. Ye, T. Li, N. Y. Yao, J. H. Edgar, E. A. Henriksen, and C. Zu, Isotope engineering for spin defects in van der Waals materials, Nature Communications15, 104 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  37. [44]

    H. Cai, S. Ru, Z. Jiang, J. J. H. Eng, R. He, F.-l. Li, Y. Miao, J. Z´ u˜ niga-P´ erez, and W. Gao, Spin De- fects in hBN assisted by Metallic Nanotrenches for Quan- tum Sensing, Nano Letters 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00849 (2023)

    2023 doi

  38. [45]

    Ltd., Your new quantum sensor made of diamond, accessed Jan

    Q. Ltd., Your new quantum sensor made of diamond, accessed Jan. 20th, 2025

    2025

  39. [46]

    A. J. Ramsay, R. Hekmati, C. J. Patrickson, S. Baber, D. R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, A. J. Bennett, and I. J. Lux- moore, Room temperature coherent control of protected qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 157 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    R. Gong, G. He, X. Gao, P. Ju, Z. Liu, B. Ye, E. A. Hen- riksen, T. Li, and C. Zu, Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron ni- tride, Nature Communications 14, 3299 (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    M. J. Turner, Quantum Diamond Microscopes for Biolog- ical Systems and Integrated Circuits , Ph.D. thesis, Har- vard University (2020)

    2020

  43. [50]

    I. N. Gracheva, F. F. Murzakhanov, G. V. Mamin, M. A. Sadovnikova, B. F. Gabbasov, E. N. Mokhov, and M. R. Gafurov, Symmetry of the Hyperfine and Quadrupole Interactions of Boron Vacancies in a Hexag- onal Boron Nitride, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0...

    2023 doi

  44. [51]

    L. B. Hughes, S. A. Meynell, W. Wu, S. Parthasarathy, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, E. J. Davis, K. Mukherjee, N. Y. Yao, and A. C. B. Jayich, A strongly interacting, two-dimensional, dipolar spin ensemble in (111)-oriented diamond, 2404.10075

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu, H. Yang, A. C. B. Jayich, and N. Y. Yao, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, 2503.14585

  46. [53]

    Arunkumar, D

    N. Arunkumar, D. B. Bucher, M. J. Turner, P. TomHon, D. Glenn, S. Lehmkuhl, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, M. S. Rosen, T. Theis, and R. L. Walsworth, Micron-Scale NV-NMR Spectroscopy with Signal Amplification by Re- versible Exchange, PRX Quantum 2, 010305 (2021)

    2021

  47. [54]

    M. H. Abobeih, J. Randall, C. E. Bradley, H. P. Bartling, M. A. Bakker, M. J. Degen, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Atomic-scale imaging of a 27-nuclear-spin cluster using a quantum sensor, Nature 576, 411 (2019)

    2019

  48. [55]

    O. T. Whaites, J. G. Oliv´ an, and J. Casanova, High- Field NMR Enhanced Sensitivity via Nuclear Spin Lock- ing with NV Centers, 2504.00887

  49. [56]

    Z. Yin, J. J. Welter, C. A. Hart, P. V. Petruzzi, and R. L. Walsworth, High-resolution, Wide-frequency- range Magnetic Spectroscopy with Solid-state Spin Ensembles, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02040 (2024), arXiv:2412.02040 [quant-ph]

    2024 doi arXiv

  50. [57]

    Bruckmaier, K

    F. Bruckmaier, K. D. Briegel, and D. B. Bucher, Ge- ometry dependence of micron-scale NMR signals on NV- diamond chips, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open 8- 9, 100023 (2021)

    2021

  51. [58]

    K. S. Liu, A. Henning, M. W. Heindl, R. D. Allert, J. D. Bartl, I. D. Sharp, R. Rizzato, and D. B. Bucher, Surface NMR using quantum sensors in diamond, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2111607119 (2022)

    2022

  52. [59]

    Childress, M

    L. Childress, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Zibrov, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Coherent Dynamics of Coupled Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond, Science 314, 281 (2006)

    2006

  53. [60]

    T. H. Taminiau, J. J. T. Wagenaar, T. van der Sar, F. Jelezko, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Detec- tion and Control of Individual Nuclear Spins Using a Weakly Coupled Electron Spin, Physical Review Letters 109, 137602 (2012)

    2012

  54. [61]

    Sharma, R

    E. Sharma, R. Rathi, J. Misharwal, B. Sinhmar, S. Ku- mari, J. Dalal, and A. Kumar, Evolution in Lithogra- phy Techniques: Microlithography to Nanolithography, Nanomaterials 12, 2754 (2022)

    2022

  55. [62]

    Bradley, J

    C. Bradley, J. Randall, M. Abobeih, R. Berrevoets, M. Degen, M. Bakker, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. Taminiau, A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute, Physical Review X 9, 031045 (2019)

    2019

  56. [63]

    Sushkov, I

    A. Sushkov, I. Lovchinsky, N. Chisholm, R. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. Lukin, Magnetic Resonance Detection of Individual Proton Spins Using Quantum Reporters, Physical Review Letters 113, 197601 (2014)

    2014

  57. [64]

    M. H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M. A. Bakker, N. Kalb, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, One- second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment, Nature Communi- cations 9, 2552 (2018). 25

    2018

  58. [65]

    M. V. G. Dutt, L. Childress, L. Jiang, E. Togan, J. Maze, F. Jelezko, A. S. Zibrov, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Register Based on Individual Electronic and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond, Science 316, 1312 (2007)

    2007

  59. [66]

    T. D. W. Claridge, Chapter 9 - Diffusion NMR spec- troscopy, inTetrahedron Organic Chemistry Series, High- Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry, Vol. 27, edited by T. D. W. Claridge (Elsevier, 2009) pp. 303–334

    2009

  60. [67]

    Chandler, Introduction to modern statistical mechan- ics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)

    D. Chandler, Introduction to modern statistical mechan- ics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)

    1987

  61. [68]

    D. Daly, N. Reed, S. DeVience, Z. Yin, J. Cremer, A. Beling, J. Blanchard, and R. Walsworth, Replication Data and Code Repository for: Prospects for Ultralow- Mass Nuclear Magnetic Resonance using Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (2025)

    2025

  62. [69]

    Gierak, C

    J. Gierak, C. Vieu, H. Launois, G. B. Assayag, and A. Septier, Focused ion beam nanolithography on AlF3 at a 10 nm scale, Applied Physics Letters 70, 2049 (1997)

    1997

  63. [70]

    Kianinia, S

    M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fr¨ och, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of Spin Defects in Hexago- nal Boron Nitride, ACS Photonics 7, 2147 (2020)

    2020

  64. [71]

    Cohen, R

    D. Cohen, R. Nigmatullin, M. Eldar, and A. Retzker, Confined Nano-NMR Spectroscopy Using NV Centers, Advanced Quantum Technologies 3, 2000019 (2020)

    2020

  65. [72]

    The composition and structure of the ubiquitous hydro- carbon contamination on van der Waals materials, , 21 (2022)

    2022

  66. [73]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science 353, aac9439

  67. [74]

    H. Zhao, Q. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Wang, H. Ding, S. Li, X. Guo, W. Wang, and L. Gao, Enhanced performance and long-term stability of 2D photodetectors through hexagonal boron nitride encapsulation, Applied Physics Letters 126, 10.1063/5.0244991

    doi

  68. [76]

    Clua-Provost, A

    T. Clua-Provost, A. Durand, J. Frauni´ e, C. Robert, X. Marie, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, B. Gil, J.-M. G´ erard, G. Cassabois, and V. Jacques, Impact of Thickness- Dependent Nanophotonic Effects on the Optical Re- sponse of Color Centers in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Nano Letters 24, ...

    2024

  69. [77]

    R. S. Pease, Crystal Structure of Boron Nitride, Nature 165, 722 (1950)

    1950

  70. [78]

    X. Xu, A. B. Solanki, D. Sychev, X. Gao, S. Peana, A. S. Baburin, K. Pagadala, Z. O. Martin, S. N. Chowdhury, Y. P. Chen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, I. A. Rodionov, A. V. Kildishev, T. Li, P. Upadhyaya, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, Greatly Enhanced Emission from Spin Defe...

    2023

  71. [79]

    Z. Yin, J. Tang, C. A. Hart, J. W. Blanchard, X. Xiang, S. Satyajit, S. Bhalerao, T. Tao, S. J. DeVience, and R. L. Walsworth, Quantum diamond microscope for nar- rowband magnetic imaging with high spatial and spectral resolution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054050 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    H. J. Hogben, M. Krzystyniak, G. T. P. Charnock, P. J. Hore, and I. Kuprov, Spinach – A software library for simulation of spin dynamics in large spin systems, Jour- nal of Magnetic Resonance 208, 179 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.