Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 79 references

Path-Integral Approach to Quantum Acoustics

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A coherent-state path integral yields a stochastic master equation claimed to be exact for any system linearly coupled to a harmonic lattice, demonstrated on the Fröhlich model.

desk verdict The master equation is a coherent-state specialization of Stockburger's SLN method; the paper is worth refereeing, but the exactness claim rests on an unproven complex-noise construction and the numerical benchmark compares two different models. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00861 v2 pith:RVQSS23W submitted 2025-05-01 quant-ph

Joost V. de Nijs , Anton M. Graf , Eric J. Heller , Joonas Keski-Rahkonen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumacousticscoherentstatesstochasticmasterequationpathintegralHubbard-Stratonovichtransformationnon-Markoviandynamicselectron-phononinteractionFröhlichmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a wave-based, rather than particle-based, description of lattice vibrations—quantum acoustics—in which phonons behave like photons and acoustic waves like electromagnetic waves. Its central claim is that a non-Markovian stochastic master equation derived from a coherent-state path integral captures the exact reduced dynamics of any system coupled linearly to a harmonic lattice bath, with no restriction to weak coupling, Markovian behavior, or continuous spectral densities. The authors demonstrate the procedure on the Fröhlich model of electron-phonon interaction, computing momentum relaxation and wavepacket spreading in weak- and strong-coupling regimes and comparing with mean-field and perturbation theory. If the claim holds, the framework supplies a first-principles, non-perturbative tool for electron-lattice dynamics and places quantum acoustics on the same footing as quantum optics.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the coherent-state path integral for the lattice bath, with the bath initialized as a multimode coherent state (or a thermal ensemble of such states). The bath's effect on the system is packaged in an influence functional, the phase factor that records how the bath responds to the system's history; this functional is split into a mean-field action $S_{\mathrm{mf}}$ linear in the coupling and an influence phase $\Psi$ quadratic in the coupling. A Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation introduces two Gaussian noise fields $\eta_q(t)$ and $\nu_q(t)$ whose covariances are fixed by the lattice propagators; substituting them turns the influence phase into averaged noise actions and yields the stochastic master equation. The operational object is the stochastic pseudopotential $H^{\pm}_{B+I} = H_{\mathrm{mf}} - \sum_q(\eta_q(t)\cdot g_q \mp \frac{1}{2}\nu_q(t)\cdot g_q)$, which turns the problem into two non-Hermitian Schrödinger equations per noise realization; averaging over noise recovers the physical density matrix.

What would settle it

Compare the noise-averaged density matrix from Eq. (8) against an exact solution of the same model in a case where one is available—for instance, a single system mode linearly coupled to one or two harmonic bath modes solved by direct numerical integration of the composite Schrödinger equation; if the averages disagree for any such benchmark, the exactness claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central discovery is the stochastic Liouville–von Neumann equation (Eq. 8), $i\partial_t \tilde{\rho}_S = [H_S + H_{\mathrm{mf}}, \tilde{\rho}_S] - \sum_q( [\eta_q(t)\cdot g_q, \tilde{\rho}_S] - \frac{1}{2}\{\nu_q(t)\cdot g_q, \tilde{\rho}_S\})$, whose noise average $\rho_S = \langle \tilde{\rho}_S \rangle_W$ reproduces the exact reduced density matrix of the system. The derivation starts from a multimode coherent-state density matrix for the lattice and the Feynman–Vernon influence functional, decomposes the latter into a linear mean-field action and a quadratic influence phase, and applies the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation to convert the phase into Gaussian noise. The paper claims this master equation is exact for any system with coupling linear in the bath coordinates and nonlinear in the system coordinates, beyond weak coupling and Markovian approximation, and that it can be unraveled into two independent Schrödinger equations with non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, allowing wave-packet propagation in real space. Applied to the Fröhlich model, it yields relaxation times and spatial spreads that agree with mean-field and perturbation theory at high temperature, while exposing spontaneous emission from zero-point lattice fluctuations at low temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that one Gaussian wavepacket launched at the Fermi momentum stands in for a real charge carrier, even though the model neglects the occupied electron states around it and the exclusion principle that would block many decays; the paper itself says the resulting low-temperature spontaneous emission is unphysical for metals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any system with coupling linear in the bath coordinates and nonlinear in the system coordinates can be propagated non-perturbatively, without weak-coupling or Markovian assumptions, by sampling the noise and averaging the resulting wavefunctions.
  • In the weak-coupling limit the mean-field deformation-potential picture is recovered, because the mean-field action is linear in the coupling while the influence phase is quadratic; the master equation therefore reduces to the established quasi-classical description as the coupling shrinks.
  • Zero-point lattice fluctuations generate spontaneous emission that the mean-field approximation omits, so at low temperature the exact momentum relaxation time saturates to a finite value while the mean-field value vanishes.
  • Because the formalism accommodates arbitrary dispersion, discrete or coherent baths, and any system Hamiltonian, it extends beyond the Fröhlich model to optical modes, molecular vibrations, or other linear-coupling settings without a Lee–Low–Pines restriction to a vacuum bath.
  • Benchmarking on the Fröhlich model shows the method tracks perturbation theory and mean-field results where expected, giving a validated baseline for entering the non-perturbative strong-coupling regime where no perturbative benchmark exists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same master equation should apply to optical phonons and to molecular or cavity vibrational modes, since the derivation only requires coupling linear in bath coordinates; testing those settings would widen the quantum-acoustics analogy beyond acoustic deformation-potential coupling.
  • A natural next step is to replace the single Gaussian wavepacket with a multi-electron initial state that respects fermionic statistics, which would test whether the low-temperature spontaneous-emission saturation survives Pauli blocking and would turn the reduced-model results into material predictions.
  • Because the stochastic potential is additive over modes, the approach is naturally parallelizable and could be combined with existing wavefunction propagation codes; a practical speedup over quantum Monte Carlo or hierarchical-equation methods is a plausible but unproven consequence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a path-integral formalism for a 'quantum acoustics' program in which a harmonic lattice bath is represented in a coherent-state (wave) picture rather than a Fock-state (particle) picture. The central result is a non-Markovian stochastic master equation, Eq. (8), for a system coupled linearly to bath coordinates through arbitrary system-dependent functions g_q(r). The derivation follows the Feynman-Vernon influence-functional route and uses a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation to replace the bath influence by Gaussian noises η_q, ν_q with prescribed covariances (Eq. 7). The authors claim the equation is exact beyond weak coupling and the Markovian approximation, and they demonstrate the method on the Fröhlich model, comparing momentum relaxation times and wavepacket spreads obtained from the stochastic master equation, from a pure mean-field treatment, and from perturbation theory for Copper (weak coupling) and Bi2212 (strong coupling). The Supplement contains the full derivation, simulation details, and the perturbation-theory formulas used as benchmarks.

Significance. If the central exactness claim holds, the paper provides a useful and nontrivial extension of the Stockburger–Grabert stochastic Liouvillian machinery to baths with non-bilinear coupling (linear in bath coordinates but arbitrary in system coordinates), including coherent and discrete-mode baths. This fills a genuine gap in the open-quantum-systems toolbox and offers a potentially powerful non-perturbative simulation method for electron-lattice dynamics. The application to the Fröhlich model is plausible and the mean-field and perturbation-theory comparisons provide independent consistency checks. The paper also makes explicit that the method reproduces the spontaneous-emission contribution absent from the mean-field treatment, which is a physically meaningful and checkable prediction. However, the exactness proof is incomplete at a load-bearing point: the complex-noise extension in Supplement S2.B, which is needed because the required noise covariances are not positive semidefinite, is not shown to preserve the influence functional that defines the original model. This gap, if unresolved, would leave Eq.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section III.A and Figure 2] The comparison between the stochastic master-equation results and the perturbation-theory benchmark is not fully quantitative. The reader is told that τ is extracted from an exponential fit of the momentum decay and that the analytic formulas (S60)-(S61) serve as the perturbative reference, but the figure shows separate curves for the numerical simulation and the analytic approximation with no error bars, no noise realizations count, and no convergence study with respect to either the number of trajectories or the time step. The claims that the stochastic and mean-field methods 'align well' and that the difference is due solely to spontaneous emission would be far more convincing with a convergence analysis in the number of noise realizations and a quantitative goodness-of-fit measure between the simulation and the analytic perturbation-theory curves.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figure 3] The caption of Figure 3 says the dashed line indicates the Debye temperature, but the legend does not explicitly show the dashed line. Please make sure each line and symbol is identified in the caption and legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the master equation is derived from the path-integral influence functional via the Hubbard-Stratonovich identity, and the numerical benchmarks are independent cross-checks.

full rationale

The central claim, Eq. (8), is not fitted to any target result. In Supplement S1, the influence functional is computed from the bath propagator (Eqs. S10-S24), then the noise covariances in Eq. (S27) are chosen so that the Hubbard-Stratonovich identity (S28) reproduces that influence phase; the master equation follows by substituting the resulting noise action into the path integral (Eq. S32). This is a constructive stochastic-unravelling identity, not a redefinition of the answer. The mean-field and Fermi-golden-rule comparisons in Section III.A and Supplement S2.E are independent benchmarks derived separately (Eqs. S55-S61), and the differences they expose (spontaneous emission, low-temperature fermiology) are not input constraints. Self-citations to Ref. [10] and related deformation-potential papers set context and provide material parameters, but the derivation does not rely on those citations for its exactness. The only substantive concern in the paper is internal rather than circular: Supplement S2.B concedes that the specified noise covariance is not positive semidefinite and that extra 'unphysical' covariances are introduced to make the FFT-generated complex noise well defined; the paper does not prove that this extension preserves the characteristic functional in Eq. (S28). That is a correctness or validation gap in the numerical implementation, not a case of a prediction reducing by construction to its inputs. Thus no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method assumes a harmonic, Gaussian bath with factorized initial conditions; these are the standard domain assumptions of the Feynman-Vernon influence functional approach. The only ad hoc element is the complex-noise extension with freely chosen extra covariances, which is not derived in the paper. Material parameters are inputs from experimental literature, not fitted in this work, so no free parameters are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The bath is a set of independent harmonic oscillators (Eq. S2).
    The derivation of the influence functional and the master equation relies on Gaussian bath statistics; anharmonic or interacting lattice modes are outside the formalism.
  • domain assumption The initial composite state is separable: ρ(0)=ρ_S⊗ρ_B (Eq. S4).
    The path-integral propagator is derived from this factorized start; correlated initial states are not covered.
  • domain assumption The initial bath state is Gaussian: a multimode coherent state or thermal mixture (Eqs. S6, S7).
    The influence functional is evaluated as a Gaussian integral; non-Gaussian bath states would break the Hubbard-Stratonovich step.
  • standard math Feynman-Vernon influence functional and Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation are valid for this linear coupling (Eqs. S20, S28).
    Standard path-integral results for harmonic baths; the novel part is their application to coherent states with the given g_q(r).
  • ad hoc to paper The complex-noise extension with freely chosen unphysical covariances preserves the exact physical density matrix after averaging (Supplement S2.B, Eqs. S46-S50).
    The real-noise covariance is not positive semidefinite; the paper extends to complex noise and chooses extra covariances to fix this, citing [20] but without a proof of exactness for this class of couplings.
  • domain assumption A single-electron Gaussian wavepacket launched at the Fermi momentum captures the relevant transport of the metal (Supplement S2.C).
    The simulations ignore Fermi statistics; the authors note this leads to unphysical spontaneous emission at low T for metals (Section III.A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Path-Integral Approach to Quantum Acoustics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RVQSS23W

@misc{pith2026250500861,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Path-Integral Approach to Quantum Acoustics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RVQSS23W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00861}
}
read the original abstract

A path-integral approach to quantum acoustics is developed here. In contrast to the commonly utilized particle perspective, this emerging field brings forth a long neglected but essential wave paradigm for lattice vibrations. Within the coherent state picture, we formulate a non-Markovian, stochastic master equation that captures the exact dynamics of any system with coupling linear in the bath coordinates and nonlinear in the system coordinates. We further demonstrate the capability of the presented master equation by applying the corresponding procedure to the eminent Fr\"ohlich model. In general, we establish a solid foundation for quantum acoustics as a kindred framework to quantum optics, while paving the way for deeper first-principle explorations of non-perturbative system dynamics driven by lattice vibrations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00861 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Figure summarizes the general scheme behind the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Inverse relaxation time as a function of tempera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Time-averaged spatial spread [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    HS +Hmf− X q ηq(t)·gq∓ 1 2νq(t) ·gq # |ψ±⟩ =

    and weak ( K ≫ 1) coupling regimes, particularly benchmarking the master equation approach against the purely mean-field resort. Specifically, we calculate the the time-averaged spatial spread for the initialized wavepacket|ψ⟩ as ξ = s 1 T Z T 0 ⟨⟨ψ−|∆x2 + ∆y2|ψ+⟩⟩W dt, (16) where ∆x2 is the variance and the averaging time window is set toT = 40 fs (for f...

    work page

  2. [2]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-particle physics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Ashcroft and N

    N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin, Solid State Physics , HRW international editions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976)

    1976

  5. [5]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen, Introduction to solid state physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Bloch, Zum elektrischen widerstandsgesetz bei tiefen temperaturen, Z

    F. Bloch, Zum elektrischen widerstandsgesetz bei tiefen temperaturen, Z. Phys 59, 208 (1930)

    work page 1930

  7. [7]

    Gr¨ uneisen, Ann

    E. Gr¨ uneisen, Ann. Phys., Lpz.16 (1933)

    work page 1933

  8. [8]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field, Phys. Rev 131, 2766 (1963)

    work page 1963

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Scully and M

    M. Scully and M. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    D. Kim, A. Aydin, A. Daza, K. N. Avanaki, J. Keski-Rahkonen, and E. J. Heller, Coherent charge carrier dynamics in the presence of thermal lattice vibrations, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054311 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. i. basic theory: The correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation, Proc. R. Soc. A 242, 300 (1957)

    1957

  5. [13]

    Shockley and J

    W. Shockley and J. Bardeen, Energy bands and mobilities in monatomic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 77, 407 (1950)

    1950

  6. [14]

    Bardeen and W

    J. Bardeen and W. Shockley, Deformation potentials and mobilities in non-polar crystals, Phys. Rev. 80, 72 (1950)

    1950

  7. [15]

    Aydin, J

    A. Aydin, J. Keski-Rahkonen, A. M. Graf, S. Yuan, X.-Y. Ouyang, ¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and E. J. Heller, Polaron formation within quantum acoustics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19788 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kim and B

    D. Kim and B. I. Halperin, Low-energy tail of the spectral density for a particle interacting with a quantum phonon bath, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224311 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Aydin, J

    A. Aydin, J. Keski-Rahkonen, and E. J. Heller, Quantum acoustics unravels planckian resistivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2404853121 (2024), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2404853121

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Keski-Rahkonen, X

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, X. Ouyang, S. Yuan, A. M. Graf, A. Aydin, and E. J. Heller, Quantum-acoustical drude peak shift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 186303 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Feynman and A

    R. Feynman and A. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , International Earth and Planetary Sciences Series (McGraw-Hill, 1965)

    1965

  12. [20]

    J. T. Stockburger and H. Grabert, Non-markovian quantum state diffusion, Chem. Phys. 268, 249 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    J. T. Stockburger, Simulating spin-boson dynamics with stochastic liouville–von neumann equations, Chemical Physics 296, 159 (2004), the Spin-Boson Problem: From Electron Transfer to Quantum Computing ... to the 60th Birthday of Professor Ulrich Weiss

    2004

  14. [22]

    C. K. Lee, J. Moix, and J. Cao, Accuracy of second order perturbation theory in the polaron and variational polaron frames, The Journal of Chemical Physics 136, 204120 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Adv

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Adv. Phys.3, 325 (1954)

    1954

  16. [24]

    Fr¨ ohlich and N

    H. Fr¨ ohlich and N. F. Mott, Theory of electrical breakdown in ionic crystals, Proc. R. Soc. A 160, 230 (1937)

    1937

  17. [25]

    Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems , 4th ed

    U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems , 4th ed. (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/8334

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    E. J. Heller and D. Kim, Schr¨ odinger correspondence applied to crystals, J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 4379 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Weiss, Quantum dissipative systems (World Scientific, 2012)

    U. Weiss, Quantum dissipative systems (World Scientific, 2012). 12

    2012

  20. [28]

    Feynman and F

    R. Feynman and F. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys. 24, 118 (1963)

    1963

  21. [29]

    Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys

    J. Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959)

    1959

  22. [30]

    Stratonovich, On a method of calculating quantum distribution functions, in Soviet Physics Doklady , Vol

    R. Stratonovich, On a method of calculating quantum distribution functions, in Soviet Physics Doklady , Vol. 2 (1957) p. 416

    1957

  23. [31]

    Ehrenfest, Bemerkung ¨ uber die angen¨ aherte g¨ ultigkeit der klassischen mechanik innerhalb der quantenmechanik, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik45, 455 (1927)

    P. Ehrenfest, Bemerkung ¨ uber die angen¨ aherte g¨ ultigkeit der klassischen mechanik innerhalb der quantenmechanik, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik45, 455 (1927)

    1927

  24. [32]

    Zimmermann, J

    Y. Zimmermann, J. Keski-Rahkonen, A. M. Graf, and E. J. Heller, Rise and fall of anderson localization by lattice vibrations: A time-dependent machine learning approach, Entropy 26, 552 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal, Phys. Rev. 90, 297 (1953)

    1953

  26. [34]

    Grusdt, A

    F. Grusdt, A. Shashi, D. Abanin, and E. Demler, Bloch oscillations of bosonic lattice polarons, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063610 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Y. Han, J. Fang, H. Zhang, Y. Sun, Y. Yuan, X. Chen, M. Jia, X. Li, H. Gao, and Z. Shi, Chalcogenide perovskite euhfs3 with low band gap and antiferromagnetic properties for photovoltaics, Energy Material Advances 5, 0116 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Lafalce, R

    E. Lafalce, R. Bodin, B. W. Larson, J. Hao, M. A. Haque, U. Huynh, J. L. Blackburn, and Z. V. Vardeny, Optical studies of doped two-dimensional lead halide perovskites: Evidence for rashba-split branches in the conduction band, ACS nano 18, 18299 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    X. Lin, Z. Zhu, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Fermi surface of the most dilute superconductor, Physical Review X 3, 021002 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    Skipetrov, E

    E. Skipetrov, E. Bogdanov, B. Kovalev, L. Skipetrova, A. Knotko, A. Emelyanov, A. Taldenkov, and V. Slynko, Electronic structure and unusual magnetic properties of diluted magnetic semiconductors pb1-x-ysnxscyte, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 893, 162330 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Nimbalkar and H

    A. Nimbalkar and H. Kim, Opportunities and challenges in twisted bilayer graphene: a review, Nano-Micro Letters 12, 1 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    T. Cea, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Electronic band structure and pinning of fermi energy to van hove singularities in twisted bilayer graphene: A self-consistent approach, Physical Review B 100, 205113 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Q

    H. Zhang, Q. Li, Y. Park, Y. Jia, W. Chen, J. Li, Q. Liu, C. Bao, N. Leconte, S. Zhou, et al. , Observation of dichotomic field-tunable electronic structure in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene, Nature Communications 15, 3737 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    C. M. Varma, Colloquium : Linear in temperature resistivity and associated mysteries including high temperature super- conductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 031001 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    J. A. N. Bruin, H. Sakai, R. S. Perry, and A. P. Mackenzie, Similarity of scattering rates in metals showing T-linear resistivity, Science 339, 804 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Polshyn, M

    H. Polshyn, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. R. Dean, and A. F. Young, Large linear- in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 15, 1011 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Ciuchi, S

    S. Ciuchi, S. Fratini, and D. Mayou, Transient localization in crystalline organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 83, 081202 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Pustogow, Y

    A. Pustogow, Y. Saito, A. L¨ ohle, M. S. Alonso, A. Kawamoto, V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, M. Dressel, and S. Fratini, Rise and fall of landau’s quasiparticles while approaching the mott transition, Nat. Commun. 12, 1571 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. M. Graf, A. Aydin, J. Keski-Rahkonen, and E. J. Heller, Planckian diffusion: The ghost of anderson localization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18768 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    N. E. Hussey ∥, K. Takenaka, and H. Takagi, Universality of the mott-ioffe-regel limit in metals, Philosophical Magazine 84, 2847 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    Gunnarsson, M

    O. Gunnarsson, M. Calandra, and J. E. Han, Colloquium: Saturation of electrical resistivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1085 (2003)

    2003

  42. [50]

    Biswas, O

    A. Biswas, O. Iakutkina, Q. Wang, H. Lei, M. Dressel, and E. Uykur, Spin-reorientation-induced band gap in fe 3 sn 2: Optical signatures of weyl nodes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 076403 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Pustogow, Y

    A. Pustogow, Y. Saito, A. L¨ ohle, M. Sanz Alonso, A. Kawamoto, V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, M. Dressel, and S. Fratini, Rise and fall of landau’s quasiparticles while approaching the mott transition, Nat. Comm. 12, 1571 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Jaramillo, S

    R. Jaramillo, S. D. Ha, D. Silevitch, and S. Ramanathan, Origins of bad-metal conductivity and the insulator–metal transition in the rare-earth nickelates, Nat. Phys. 10, 304 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Michon, C

    B. Michon, C. Berthod, C. W. Rischau, A. Ataei, L. Chen, S. Komiya, S. Ono, L. Taillefer, D. van der Marel, and A. Georges, Reconciling scaling of the optical conductivity of cuprate superconductors with planckian resistivity and specific heat, Nat. Comm. 14, 3033 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Vasiliu-Doloc, S

    L. Vasiliu-Doloc, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, S. Sinha, J. Lynn, J. Mesot, O. Seeck, G. Preosti, A. Fedro, and J. Mitchell, Charge melting and polaron collapse in La 1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4393 (1999)

    1999

  47. [55]

    Guzelturk, T

    B. Guzelturk, T. Winkler, T. W. Van de Goor, M. D. Smith, S. A. Bourelle, S. Feldmann, M. Trigo, S. W. Teitelbaum, H.-G. Steinr¨ uck, G. A. de la Pena,et al., Visualization of dynamic polaronic strain fields in hybrid lead halide perovskites, Nat. Mater. 20, 618 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Feldmann, M

    S. Feldmann, M. K. Gangishetty, I. Bravi´ c, T. Neumann, B. Peng, T. Winkler, R. H. Friend, B. Monserrat, D. N. Congreve, and F. Deschler, Charge carrier localization in doped perovskite nanocrystals enhances radiative recombination, JACS143, 8647 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    D. D. Blach, V. A. Lumsargis, D. E. Clark, C. Chuang, K. Wang, L. Dou, R. D. Schaller, J. Cao, C. W. Li, and L. Huang, Superradiance and exciton delocalization in perovskite quantum dot superlattices, Nano Lett. 22, 7811 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    L. G. Feld, S. C. Boehme, S. Sabisch, N. Frenkel, N. Yazdani, V. Morad, C. Zhu, M. Svyrydenko, R. Tao, M. Bodnarchuk, 13 et al. , Phonon-driven wavefunction localization promotes room-temperature, pure single-photon emission in large organic- inorganic lead-halide quantum dots...

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum monte carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001)

    2001

  53. [61]

    Burghardt, M

    I. Burghardt, M. Nest, and G. A. Worth, Multiconfigurational system-bath dynamics using gaussian wave packets: Energy relaxation and decoherence induced by a finite-dimensional bath, The Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 5364 (2003)

    2003

  54. [62]

    Tanimura and R

    Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, Time evolution of a quantum system in contact with a nearly gaussian-markoffian noise bath, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 58, 101 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.58.101

    1989 doi

  55. [63]

    D. P. S. McCutcheon, N. S. Dattani, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, and A. Nazir, A general approach to quantum dynamics using a variational master equation: Application to phonon-damped Rabi rotations in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 84, 081305 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Schmitz and J

    K. Schmitz and J. T. Stockburger, A variance reduction technique for the stochastic liouville–von neumann equation, The European physical journal. ST, Special topics 227, 1929 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    C. P. Herrero and R. Ramirez, Path-integral simulation of solids, J. Condens. Matter Phys. 26, 233201 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Z. Li, P. Graziosi, and N. Neophytou, Deformation potential extraction and computationally efficient mobility calculations in silicon from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195201 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Resta, Deformation-potential theorem in metals and in dielectrics, Phys

    R. Resta, Deformation-potential theorem in metals and in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. B 44, 11035 (1991)

    1991

  60. [68]

    Y. Jin, X. Wang, M. Yao, D. Qiu, D. J. Singh, J. Xi, J. Yang, and L. Xi, High-throughput deformation potential and electrical transport calculations, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 190 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Feynman and F

    R. Feynman and F. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Annals of Physics 24, 118 (1963)

    1963

  62. [70]

    E. J. Heller, The semiclassical way to dynamics and spectroscopy (Princeton University Press, 2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Tannor, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (University Science Books, 2007)

    D. Tannor, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (University Science Books, 2007)

    2007

  64. [72]

    Keski-Rahkonen, A

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, A. Ruhanen, E. Heller, and E. R¨ as¨ anen, Quantum Lissajous scars, Physical Review Letters123, 214101 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Keski-Rahkonen, P

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, P. J. J. Luukko, L. Kaplan, E. J. Heller, and E. R¨ as¨ anen, Controllable quantum scars in semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094204 (2017)

    2017

  66. [74]

    Keski-Rahkonen, A

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, A. Graf, and E. Heller, Antiscarring in chaotic quantum wells, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18081 (2024), 2403.18081

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    A. Daza, E. J. Heller, A. M. Graf, and E. R¨ as¨ anen, Propagation of waves in high brillouin zones: Chaotic branched flow and stable superwires, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2110285118 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    A. M. Graf, K. Lin, M. Kim, J. Keski-Rahkonen, A. Daza, and E. J. Heller, Chaos-assisted dynamical tunneling in flat band superwires, Entropy 26, 492 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic phonon scattering limited carrier mobility in two-dimensional extrinsic graphene, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115449 (2008)

    2008

  70. [78]

    D. K. Efetov and P. Kim, Controlling electron-phonon interactions in graphene at ultrahigh carrier densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256805 (2010)

    2010

  71. [79]

    Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids , International series of monographs on physics (OUP Oxford, 2001)

    J. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids , International series of monographs on physics (OUP Oxford, 2001)

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.