Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Elucidating the role of ribosomal A1493 in stabilization and rigid support for the codon-anticodon helix from molecular dynamics simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A1493 stabilizes the codon-anticodon helix by shrinking the open state's entropy and wedging mRNA and tRNA apart.

desk verdict A1493 paper has a genuinely new 2D free-energy result and a plausible wedge/entropy mechanism, but the off-state PMF comes from a restrained 20 Å fragment, so the decisive control is a larger-shell rerun. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01327 v1 pith:73XP6AZQ submitted 2025-05-02 physics.bio-ph

Shuhao Zhang , Zhen Wang , Jie Qiao , Wenbing Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords ribosomaldecodingA1493codon-anticodonhelixentropystabilizationumbrellasamplingmoleculardynamicspseudouridinetranslationfidelity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses molecular dynamics simulations of the ribosomal decoding center to establish what the conserved 16S rRNA nucleotide A1493 actually does during tRNA selection. It argues that A1493 stabilizes the first codon-anticodon base pair entropically: by limiting the number of conformations the first codon base can adopt when its pair opens, it makes the closed state more probable and raises the cost of dissociation. It also claims A1493 acts as a rigid wedge between the mRNA and tRNA backbones, and that this support, together with steric complementarity involving the tRNA's 37th nucleotide, is what lets the ribosome amplify the stability difference between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs into a roughly 6 kcal/mol discrimination gap. The paper further links pseudouridine modification to water-bridged pre-organization of mRNA and describes a transient destabilization of codon-anticodon pairing during translocation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the two-dimensional free-energy surface computed by umbrella sampling, with CV1 being the opening distance of the first codon-anticodon base pair and CV2 being the flipping angle of A1493, a dihedral defined through centers of mass of the G1494 and G1491 base pairs, the G1494 phosphate, the A1493 phosphate, and the A1493 base. This map lets the authors integrate out the A1493 angle to obtain opening profiles for the "on" and "off" states, and it reveals the wedge coupling, since in the near-cognate U-U system decreasing the A1493 angle shifts the base-pair minimum from 6.1 Å to 5.4 Å.

What would settle it

If a simulation of a larger ribosome model, or an experiment using atomic mutagenesis to delete or lock A1493, found that the opening free-energy barrier of the first codon-anticodon base pair does not drop when A1493 is removed and does not rise when it is locked in the fully flipped state, the claimed entropy-stabilization and wedge mechanism would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a dual mechanism for A1493. Through two-dimensional umbrella sampling that couples the opening distance of the first base pair with the flipping angle of A1493, the paper shows that a fully extrahelical A1493 restricts the accessible conformations of the open state of the first codon nucleotide, reducing the entropy gain of opening and thereby stabilizing the codon-anticodon helix. In near-cognate complexes the same nucleotide acts as a wedge: when A1493 moves toward helix 44, the mRNA and tRNA backbones approach each other and the U-U pair collapses from one hydrogen bond to two, showing that A1493 holds the backbones apart and imposes a fixed geometry. The paper also reports that A1493 flipping itself is not tRNA-specific and that the energy gap between cognate and near-cognate systems, around 6 kcal/mol, is amplified by the ribosome, with van der Waals steric complementarity, especially contact with the tRNA 37th nucleotide, more important than A-minor hydrogen bonding.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations assume that a 20 Å fragment of the ribosome, with its outer atoms held fixed, reproduces the thermodynamics of the intact decoding center; if long-range electrostatic, allosteric, or mechanical coupling from the rest of the ribosome changes these free-energy surfaces, the entropy and wedge mechanisms could be artifacts of the truncation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ribosomal discrimination does not require A1493 to adopt different conformations for cognate versus near-cognate tRNA; its stabilizing effect is constitutive, and the distinction emerges from amplified free-energy differences.
  • Chemical modifications or mutations that prevent A1493 from fully flipping outward should lower the opening barrier of the first codon-anticodon base pair and increase miscoding, a prediction that atomic mutagenesis could test.
  • Pseudouridine at the first codon position can raise the stability of near-cognate mismatches to the level of a cognate U-A pair, providing a structural explanation for pseudouridine-induced amino acid substitutions.
  • Translocation transiently destabilizes the codon-anticodon helix, with stability restored only at the P site through distinct constraints such as U1498, giving a mechanistic route to frameshifting if that stabilization is lost.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, this "conformational caging" mechanism suggests a general fidelity strategy in RNA machines: reduce the entropy of rejected states rather than strongly stabilizing the accepted state, achieving discrimination with modest enthalpic differences.
  • The paper's claim that A1493 flipping is tRNA-nonspecific at the recognition intermediate implies that the specificity bottleneck lies in the coupled behavior of A1913 and helix 44; a simulation that explicitly lets A1913 insert and detach would test whether the amplification is gated by the large subunit.
  • The pseudouridine water-bridge mechanism predicts a measurable solvent effect: altering water activity or using heavy water should weaken pseudouridine-induced misreading, since the bridging water would be disrupted.
  • The translocation-destabilization result suggests that engineered ribosomes with altered U1498 stacking or modified P-site codon channels should show changed frameshift frequencies, a testable extension beyond the paper's current systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports molecular dynamics simulations of the ribosomal decoding center, built from a 20 Å truncated fragment of the 70S ribosome (PDB 5UYL) containing the A-site codon-anticodon helix and A1493. Using 1D and 2D umbrella sampling, the authors compute free-energy surfaces for opening of the first codon-anticodon base pair and for flipping of A1493, in cognate (U-A) and near-cognate (U-U, U-C, U-G) systems, in ribosome-free controls, with pseudouridine-modified codons, and in A-site/P-site/translocation constructs. The central claims are that A1493 stabilizes the first base pair through an entropy-restriction mechanism, that A1493 acts as a rigid wedge keeping the mRNA and tRNA backbones apart, that the ribosome amplifies the cognate versus near-cognate stability difference to about 6 kcal/mol, that A1493 flipping is non-specific, that steric complementarity with tRNA position 37 is essential, that pseudouridine stabilizes the P/A kink via a water bridge, and that the codon-anticodon helix is transiently destabilized during translocation.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work would provide a quantitative, structure-based reconciliation of the dynamic and rigid models of ribosomal decoding, and it would offer a molecular rationale for pseudouridine-induced mistranslation. The study has notable strengths: the use of a recognition-intermediate cryo-EM structure, explicit 2D umbrella sampling with a defined reaction-coordinate pair, multiple near-cognate systems, ribosome-free controls, comparisons against experimental structures such as 5EL4 and 4JV5, and an unusually candid Discussion section that states the model's limitations. The simulations are not fitted to experimental discrimination free energies, so the conclusions are not circular in that sense. However, several load-bearing interpretations—especially the entropy label and the magnitude of the discrimination gap—go beyond what the presented free-energy surfaces and error analysis support, and the central mechanism is computed within a heavily restrained truncated system for which no convergence or shell-size validation is provided.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, System setup; Results, 'The stability contributed by A1493 depends on its flip angle'] The central on/off A1493 comparison is computed in a 20 Å truncated ribosome fragment in which outer heavy atoms beyond 17 Å from A1493 and the first base pair are restrained to their initial positions. When A1493 enters the 'off' state it re-enters helix 44, and the reaction coordinate explicitly includes G1494/G1491 atoms; the cost of this re-entry is therefore coupled to helix-44 bending and long-wavelength relaxation that the positional restraints freeze. The on/off free-energy difference underlying the entropy-stabilization claim (Eqs. 1-2, Fig. 4A) and the U-U backbone contraction from 11.1 to 9.1 Å with base distance 6.1 to 5.4 Å used for the wedge claim (Fig. 5C) may thus be boundary artifacts. The authors acknowledge in the Discussion that the small-region restriction prevents analysis of the overall elastic tRNA response, but no larger-shell or unrestrained comparison is provided. A decisive test would be to recompute the 2D PMF with a substantially larger shell (e.g., 30 Å or more) or with the helix-44 region left unrestrained, and to report the sensitivity of the on/off barrier and the U-U minimum shift to the restraint cutoff.
  2. [Results, 'Mechanism of A1493 in stabilizing the codon-anticodon helix'; Summary and Discussion] The claim that A1493 stabilizes the first base pair through an entropy mechanism is not supported by the data presented. The text states that 'A1493 reduces the entropy increase of the opening process by limiting the conformations numbers of open state,' but no enthalpy/entropy decomposition, temperature-dependent free energies, or configurational-entropy estimate is provided. The inference from reduced barrier height and constrained scatter in Fig. 3C/D is indirect: a lower barrier and a narrower open-state distribution are consistent with entropy effects, but they do not establish that the stabilization is entropic rather than enthalpic. Furthermore, Eqs. 1-2 merely re-express the same 2D free energy as conditional projections; the difference between F_on and F_off is a free-energy difference, not a decomposition into entropy and enthalpy. The 'entropy-driven stabilization' wording should be replaced by a statement about the free-energy profile unless a direct entropy calculation is added.
  3. [Results, 'ψ enhances mRNA-tRNA pairing by pre-organizes A-form of mRNA'] The comparison of Ψ-C with the unmodified U-C system is not made on equal footing. Because C36 moved instead of Ψ4, the authors write that 'the free energy of the Ψ-C pair was calculated with C36 flipping constrained.' This post-hoc constraint changes the sampled reaction coordinate for one system only, so the conclusion that Ψ-C stability reaches the level of U-A is not established without justification. Please report the unconstrained Ψ-C PMF as well, show that the constrained calculation is converged, and demonstrate that the constraint does not artificially stabilize the paired state; otherwise the claim that Ψ converts a mismatch into a cognate-like pair is not testable from the present data.
  4. [Results, 'Ribosomal discrimination between cognate and near-cognate tRNA'] The ~6 kcal/mol discrimination gap is presented as 'sufficient for the ribosome to distinguish' cognate from near-cognate tRNAs, but the manuscript does not specify whether this is a barrier-height difference or a well-depth difference, does not propagate the block-analysis errors into the reported ΔΔG, and does not compare the computed difference with experimentally measured discrimination free energies. The ribosome-free U-A versus U-U difference of about 1 kcal/mol is computed in a different model (no ribosome, terminal restraints), so the 'amplification' factor is a comparison between two different free-energy surfaces rather than a single controlled variation. Please state precisely which features of the PMFs are being compared, provide error bars on the 6 kcal/mol value, and relate it quantitatively to known initial-selection and proofreading discrimination energies.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 5] The figure has two panels labeled 'B': one for the aIGM/molecular-surface analysis and one for the free-energy curves of U4 opening. Please renumber the panels consistently and update the callouts in the text.
  2. [Equations (1)-(2)] The typesetting of Eqs. 1-2 contains spacing artifacts and the subscripts 'on' and 'off' are hard to read. Please reformat these equations so that the integration domains and Boltzmann factors are unambiguous.
  3. [Reference [43]] Reference 43 is cited for the statement that the 5' end of RNA opens more easily, but reference 43 is the WHAM paper by Kumar et al. Please replace it with the appropriate RNA-fraying or base-pair-opening reference.
  4. [Results, 'ψ enhances mRNA-tRNA pairing'] The phrase 'pre-organizes A-form of mRNA' is grammatically awkward; consider 'pre-organizing the mRNA into the A-form' or 'pre-organization of the A-form mRNA structure.'
  5. [Methods, MD simulations] Statistical errors are estimated by dividing each window into four blocks for WHAM analysis; this is likely to underestimate sampling error for a 2D PMF. Please state how many independent windows contribute to each region of the PMF and consider larger block counts or bootstrapping.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all central claims are read from computed free-energy surfaces, not fitted inputs or self-cited constraints.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—entropy-driven stabilization by A1493, wedge-like rigid support, discrimination amplification, pseudouridine enhancement, and translocation destabilization—are all derived from umbrella-sampling free-energy surfaces computed in explicit-solvent MD, not from parameters fitted to the quantities being predicted. The on/off A1493 comparison (Eqs. 1–2) is an internal projection of the same two-dimensional PMF onto different ranges of the flip-angle coordinate; the authors explicitly note the on-state curve aligns with the overall profile because the PMF minimum lies in the on state, which is a consistency check rather than a circular validation. No load-bearing self-citation appears: the structural templates (5UYL, 4V9I, 4JV5, 7SSW) and force fields are external inputs, and the ribosome-free controls provide an independent reference. The acknowledged limitation that the 20 Å truncated, restrained system cannot capture full-ribosome elastic response is a correctness/robustness concern about the model, not a circularity: the conclusions are not guaranteed by the setup by construction, and the paper itself flags the scope of what the simulation can address.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on the fidelity of classical MD and on the truncated ribosome model. There are no fitted free parameters in the usual sense, but the A1493 state thresholds and the post-hoc C36 constraint are hand-chosen analysis choices. No new physical entities are proposed.

free parameters (1)
  • A1493 flip angle state thresholds = on > 120°, off < 100°
    Chosen by hand to classify A1493 states for integrating the 2D free energy surface; the derived 1D on/off curves depend on these boundaries.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Classical force fields (ff14SB for protein, OL3 for RNA, Modrna08 for modifications) accurately describe interactions in the decoding center
    All free energy results depend on the accuracy of these fixed-charge potentials; tautomerization is not represented.
  • domain assumption The 20 Å truncated ribosome model with restrained outer atoms preserves the relevant physics
    Methods, System setup: atoms beyond 17 Å are restrained, which could omit long-range effects.
  • domain assumption A1913 remains inserted in helix 44 in the recognition intermediate, restricting A1493 flipping to > 60°
    Stated in the Results and required for the interpretation of the 2D free energy surface.
  • domain assumption Keto-enol tautomerization energy cost is up to 10 kcal/mol
    Invoked in Discussion to argue against tautomerization at the first position, but the cited reference (65) is missing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elucidating the role of ribosomal A1493 in stabilization and rigid support for the codon-anticodon helix from molecular dynamics simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/73XP6AZQ

@misc{pith2026250501327,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elucidating the role of ribosomal A1493 in stabilization and rigid support for the codon-anticodon helix from molecular dynamics simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/73XP6AZQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01327}
}
read the original abstract

The ribosome ensures translational accuracy by monitoring codon-anticodon interactions at the A site decoding center. However, the mechanism by which conserved nucleotide A1493 contributes to this process remains controversial. To address this, we performed molecular dynamics simulations initiated from ribosomal recognition intermediate, revealing A1493's multiple roles in decoding. Through 2D umbrella sampling, we quantified the coupling between A1493 flipping and the stability of the first base pair in the codon-anticodon helix. Our results demonstrate that A1493 promotes mRNA-tRNA pairing through entropy-driven stabilization, amplifies stability differences between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs, and functions as a "wedge" to provide rigid support for the codon-anticodon helix. Further analysis identified steric complementarity as essential for proper A1493 flipping, with the tRNA 37th position playing a key structural role. Additionally, we explored how pseudouridine modification and translocation influence codon-anticodon stability. Together, these findings refine the current mechanistic framework of ribosomal decoding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Wintermeyer,W

    Rodnina,M.V ., Pape,T., Fricke,R., Kuhn,L. and Wintermeyer,W. (1996) Initial Binding of the Elongation Factor Tu·GTP·Aminoacyl-tRNA Complex Preceding Codon Recognition on the Ribosome. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271, 646–652

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Ogle,J.M., Murphy,F.V ., Tarry,M.J. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2002) Selection of tRNA by the Ribosome Requires a Transition from an Open to a Closed Form. Cell, 111, 721–732

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    and Weissbach,H

    Lee Miller,D. and Weissbach,H. (1974) [22] Elongation factor Tu and the aminoac yl- tRNA · EFTu · GTP complex. In Methods in Enzymology. Elsevier, V ol. 30, pp. 219–232

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    and Rodnina,M.V

    Gromadski,K.B. and Rodnina,M.V . (2004) Kinetic Determinants of High- Fidelity tRNA Discrimination on the Ribosome. Molecular Cell, 13, 191–200

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    and Ehrenberg,M

    Zhang,J., Ieong,K.- W., Johansson,M. and Ehrenberg,M. (2015) Accuracy of initial codon selection by aminoacyl-tRNAs on the mRNA-programmed bacterial ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 9602–9607

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    and Ehrenberg,M

    Ieong,K.-W., Uzun,Ü., Selmer,M. and Ehrenberg,M. (2016) Two proofreading steps amplify the accuracy of genetic code translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 113, 13744–13749

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    and Rodnina,M.V

    Gromadski,K.B., Daviter,T. and Rodnina,M.V . (2006) A Uniform Response to Mismatches in Codon-Anticodon Complexes Ensures Ribosomal Fidelity. Molecular Cell, 21, 369–377

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    (1998) Complete kinetic mechanism of elongation factor Tu- dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the E.coli ribosome

    Pape,T. (1998) Complete kinetic mechanism of elongation factor Tu- dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the E.coli ribosome. The EMBO Journal, 17, 7490–7497

    work page 1998

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    (1999) Induced fit in initial selection a nd proofreading of aminoacyl -tRNA on the ribosome

    Pape,T. (1999) Induced fit in initial selection a nd proofreading of aminoacyl -tRNA on the ribosome. The EMBO Journal, 18, 3800–3807

    1999

  2. [10]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Ogle,J.M., Brodersen,D.E., Clemons,W.M., Tarry,M.J., Carter,A.P. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2001) Recognition of Cognate Transfer RNA by the 30 S Ribosomal Subunit. Science, 292, 897–902

    2001

  3. [11]

    and Chu,S

    Blanchard,S.C., Kim,H.D., Gonzalez,R.L., Puglisi,J.D. and Chu,S. (2004) tRNA dynamics on the ribosome during translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 12893–12898

    2004

  4. [12]

    and Goldman,Y .E

    Wang,Y ., Qin,H., Kudaravalli,R.D., Kirillov,S.V ., Dempsey,G.T., Pan,D., Cooperman,B.S. and Goldman,Y .E. (2007) Single -Molecule Structural Dynamics of EF -G−Ribosome Interaction during Translocation. Biochemistry, 46, 10767–10775

    2007

  5. [13]

    and Puglisi,J.D

    Uemura,S., Aitken,C.E., Korlach,J., Flusberg,B.A., Turner,S.W. and Puglisi,J.D. (2010) Real-time tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution. Nature , 464, 1012–1017

    2010

  6. [14]

    and Puglisi,J.D

    Chen,J., Petrov,A., Tsai,A., O ’Leary,S.E. and Puglisi,J.D. (2013) Coordinated conformational and compositional dynamics drive ribosome translocation. N at Struct Mol Biol, 20, 718–727

    2013

  7. [15]

    and Korostelev,A.A

    Carbone,C.E., Loveland,A.B., Gamper,H.B., Hou,Y .- M., Demo,G. and Korostelev,A.A. (2021) Time-resolved cryo-EM visualizes ribosomal translocation with EF-G and GTP. Nat Commun, 12, 7236

    2021

  8. [16]

    and Noller,H.F

    Powers,T. and Noller,H.F. (1994) Selective perturbation of G530 of 16 S rRNA by translational miscoding agents and a streptomycin- dependence mutation in protein S12. Journal of Molecular Biology, 235, 156–172

    1994

  9. [17]

    (2024) The ribosome comes to life

    Noller,H.F. (2024) The ribosome comes to life. Cell, 187, 6486–6500

    2024

  10. [18]

    (2017) Ensemble cryo-EM elucidates the mechanism of translation fidelity

    Loveland,A.B. (2017) Ensemble cryo-EM elucidates the mechanism of translation fidelity. Nature

    2017

  11. [19]

    and Frank,J

    Agirrezabala,X., Schreiner,E., Trabuco,L.G., Lei,J., Ortiz-Meoz,R.F., Schulten,K., Green,R. and Frank,J. (2011) Structural insights into cognate versus ne ar-cognate discrimination during decoding: Unique ribosome binding of near -cognate species. The EMBO Journal, 30, 1497–1507

    2011

  12. [20]

    and Wintermeyer,W

    Rodnina,M.V . and Wintermeyer,W. (2001) Fidelity of Aminoacyl-tRNA Selection on the Ribosome: Kinetic and Structural Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 70, 415–435

    2001

  13. [21]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Ogle,J.M., Carter,A.P. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2003) Insights into the decoding mechanism from recent ribosome structures. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 28, 259–266

    2003

  14. [22]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Ogle,J.M. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2005) STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS INTO TRANSLATIONAL FIDELITY . Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74, 129–177

    2005

  15. [23]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    V oorhees,R.M. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2013) Structural Basis of the Translational Elongation Cycle. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 82, 203–236

    2013

  16. [24]

    and Yusupova,G

    Rozov,A., Demeshkina,N., Khusainov,I., Westhof,E., Yusupov,M. and Yusupova,G. (2016) Novel base-pairing interactions at the tRNA wobble position crucial for accurate reading of the genetic code. Nat Commun, 7, 10457

    2016

  17. [25]

    and Yusupova,G

    Demeshkina,N., Jenner,L., We sthof,E., Yusupov,M. and Yusupova,G. (2012) A new understanding of the decoding principle on the ribosome. Nature, 484, 256–259

    2012

  18. [26]

    and Yusupova,G

    Rozov,A., Westhof,E., Yusupov,M. and Yusupova,G. (2016) The ribosome prohibits the G•U wobble geometry at the first positio n of the codon–anticodon helix. Nucleic Acids Research

    2016

  19. [27]

    and Brooks,C.L

    Zeng,X., Chugh,J., Casiano- Negroni,A., Al -Hashimi,H.M. and Brooks,C.L. (2014) Flipping of the Ribosomal A-Site Adenines Provides a Basis for tRNA Selection. Journal of Molecular Biology, 426, 3201–3213

    2014

  20. [28]

    and Erlacher,M

    Schrode,P., Huter,P., Clementi,N. and Erlacher,M. (2017) Atomic mutagenesis at the ribosomal decoding site. RNA Biology, 14, 104–112

    2017

  21. [29]

    and Joseph,S

    Khade,P.K., Shi,X. and Joseph,S. (2013) Steric Complementarity in the Decoding Center Is Important for tRNA Selection by the Ribosome. Journal of Molecular Biology , 425, 3778–3789

    2013

  22. [30]

    and He,C

    Roundtree,I.A., Evans,M.E., Pan,T. and He,C. (2017) Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. Cell, 169, 1187–1200

    2017

  23. [31]

    and He,C

    Shi,H., Wei,J. and He,C. (2019) Where, When, and How: Context-Dependent Functions of RNA Methylation Writers, Readers, and Erasers. Molecular Cell, 74, 640–650

    2019

  24. [32]

    and Jaffrey,S.R

    Zaccara,S., Ries,R.J. and Jaffrey,S.R. (2019) Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 20, 608–624

    2019

  25. [33]

    and Koutmou,K.S

    E yler,D.E., Franco,M.K., Batool,Z., Wu,M.Z., Dubuke,M.L., Dobosz -Bartoszek,M., Jones,J.D., Polikanov,Y .S., Roy,B. and Koutmou,K.S. (2019) Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 23068– 23074

    2019

  26. [34]

    (2024) N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting

    M ulroney,T.E., Pöyry,T., Yam -Puc,J.C., Rust,M., Harvey,R.F., Kalmar,L., Horner,E., Booth,L., Ferreira,A.P., Stoneley,M., et al. (2024) N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting. Nature, 625, 189–194

    2024

  27. [35]

    and Rodnina,M.V

    Wohlgemuth,I., Pohl,C., Mi ttelstaet,J., Konevega,A.L. and Rodnina,M.V . (2011) Evolutionary optimization of speed and accuracy of decoding on the ribosome. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 366, 2979–2986

    2011

  28. [36]

    (2024) MODOMICS: a database of RNA modifications and related information

    Cappannini,A., Ray,A., Purta,E., Mukherjee,S., Boccaletto,P., Moafinejad,S.N., Lechner,A., Barchet,C., Klaholz,B.P., Stefaniak,F., et al. (2024) MODOMICS: a database of RNA modifications and related information. 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Research , 52, D239– D244

    2024

  29. [37]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Fernández,I.S., Ng,C.L., Kelley,A.C., Wu,G., Yu,Y .- T. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2013) Unusual base pairing during the decoding of a stop codon by the ribosome. Nature, 500, 107–110

    2013

  30. [38]

    and Simmerling,C

    Maier,J.A., Martinez,C., Kasavajhala,K., Wickstrom,L., Hauser,K.E. and Simmerling,C. (2015) ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain a nd Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11, 3696–3713

    2015

  31. [39]

    and Orozco,M

    Pérez,A., Marchán,I., Svozil,D., Sponer,J., Cheatham,T.E., Laughton,C.A. and Orozco,M. (2007) Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers. Biophysical Journal, 92, 3817–3829

    2007

  32. [40]

    and Jurečka,P

    Zgarbová,M., Otyepka,M., Šponer,J., Mládek,A., Banáš,P., Cheatham,T.E. and Jurečka,P. (2011) Refinement of the Cornell et al. Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 2886–2902

    2011

  33. [41]

    and Lahiri,A

    Dutta,N., Deb,I., Sarzynska,J. and Lahiri,A. (2022) Data -informed reparameterization of modified RNA and the effect of explicit water models: application to pseudouridine and derivatives. J Comput Aided Mol Des, 36, 205–224

    2022

  34. [42]

    and SantaLucia,J

    Aduri,R., Psciuk,B.T., Saro,P., Taniga,H., Schlegel,H.B. and SantaLucia,J. (2007) AMBER Force Field Parameters for the Naturally Occurring Modified Nucleosides in RNA. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 3, 1464–1475

    2007

  35. [43]

    and Kollman,P.A

    Kumar,S., Rosenberg,J.M., Bouzida,D., Swendsen,R.H. and Kollman,P.A. (1995) Multidimensional free‐energy calculations using the weighted histogram analysis method. J Comput Chem, 16, 1339–1350

    1995

  36. [44]

    and Yang,W

    Johnson,E.R., Keinan,S., Cohen,A.J. and Yang,W. Revealing Noncovalent Interactions

  37. [45]

    and Chen,Q

    Lu,T. and Chen,Q. (2022) Independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition: A new method for visual study of interactions in chemical systems. J Comput Chem, 43, 539–555

    2022

  38. [46]

    and Hénon,E

    Lefebvre,C., Rubez,G., Khartabil,H., Boisson,J.- C., Contreras -García,J. and Hénon,E. (2017) Accurately extracting the signature of intermolecular interactions present in the NCI plot of the reduced density gradient versus electron density. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 17928–17936

    2017

  39. [47]

    (2024) A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn

    Lu,T. (2024) A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 161, 082503

    2024

  40. [48]

    and Åqvist,J

    Satpati,P., Sund,J. and Åqvist,J. (2014) Structure-Based Energetics of mRNA Decoding on the Ribosome. Biochemistry, 53, 1714–1722

    2014

  41. [49]

    and Ramakrishnan,V

    Schmeing,T.M., V oorhees,R.M., Kelley,A.C., Gao,Y .- G., Murphy,F.V ., Weir,J.R. and Ramakrishnan,V . (2009) The Crystal Structure of the Ribosome Bound to EF -Tu and Aminoacyl-tRNA. Science, 326, 688–694

    2009

  42. [50]

    and Frank,J

    Fislage,M., Zhang,J., Brown,Z.P., Mandava,C.S., Sanyal,S., Ehrenberg,M. and Frank,J. (2018) Cryo-EM shows stages of initial codon selection on the ribosome by aa -tRNA in ternary complex with GTP and the GTPase-deficient EF-TuH84A. Nucleic Acids Research, 46, 5861–5874

    2018

  43. [51]

    and Yusupov,M

    Jenner,L.B., Demeshkina,N., Yusupova,G. and Yusupov,M. (2010) Structural aspects of messenger RNA reading frame maintenance by the ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17, 555– 560

    2010

  44. [52]

    and Korostelev,A.A

    Loveland,A.B., Bah,E., Madireddy,R., Zhang,Y ., Brilot,A.F., Grigorieff,N. and Korostelev,A.A. (2016) Ribosome •RelA structures reveal the mechanism of stringent response activation. eLife, 5, e17029

    2016

  45. [53]

    show that A1913 from the 50S large subunit inserted into helix 44 and A1493 flips out from helix 44. This A1913 insertion may eliminates free energy d ifferences in A1493 flipping, supporting the second model ’s view that the ribosome cannot distinguish tRNAs based on A1493 fl...

  46. [54]

    and Westhof,E

    Auffinger,P. and Westhof,E. (1998) Effects of Pseudouridylation on tRNA Hydration and Dynamics: a Theoretical Approach. In Grosjean,H., Benne,R. (eds), Modification and Editing of RNA. ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 103–112

    1998

  47. [55]

    (1995) Stabilization of RNA stacking by pseudouridine

    Davis,D.R. (1995) Stabilization of RNA stacking by pseudouridine. Nucl Acids Res, 23, 5020–5026

    1995

  48. [56]

    and Kierzek,R

    Deb,I., Popenda,Ł., Sarzyńska,J., Małgowska,M., Lahiri,A., Gdaniec,Z. and Kierzek,R. (2019) Computational and NMR studies of RNA duplexes with an internal pseudouridine- adenosine base pair. Sci Rep, 9, 16278

    2019

  49. [57]

    and Lahiri,A

    Dutta,N., Sarzynska,J. and Lahiri,A. (2020) Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Conformational Preferences of Pseudouridine Derivatives: Improving the Distribution in the Glycosidic Torsion Space. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 60, 4995–5002

    2020

  50. [58]

    and Khandelia,P

    Jalan,A., Jayasree,P.J., Karemore,P., Narayan,K.P. and Khandelia,P. (2024) Decoding the ‘Fifth’ Nucleotide: Impact of RNA Pseudouridylation on Gene Expression and Human Disease. Mol Biotechnol, 66, 1581–1598

    2024

  51. [59]

    and Korostelev,A.A

    Demo,G., Gamper,H.B., Loveland,A.B., Masuda,I., Carbone,C.E., Svidritskiy,E., Hou,Y .- M. and Korostelev,A.A. (2021) Structural basis for +1 ribosomal frameshifting during EF- G-catalyzed translocation. Nat Commun, 12, 4644

    2021

  52. [60]

    and Noller,H.F

    Zhou,J., Lancaster,L., Donohue,J.P. and Noller,H.F. (2019) Spontaneous ribosomal translocation of mRNA and tRNAs into a chimeric hybrid state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 116, 7813–7818

    2019

  53. [61]

    and Ignatova,Z

    Kazantsev,A. and Ignatova,Z. (2021) Constraints on error rate revealed by computational study of G•U tautomerization in translation. Nucleic Acids Research, 49, 11823–11833

    2021

  54. [62]

    and Åqvist,J

    Satpati,P. and Åqvist,J. (2014) Why base tautomerization does not cause errors in mRNA decoding on the ribosome. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, 12876–12884

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.