Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions at Neutrino Experiments and Colliders

Ayres Freitas; Matthew Low

arxiv: 2505.01401 · v3 · submitted 2025-05-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions at Neutrino Experiments and Colliders

Ayres Freitas , Matthew Low This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords non-standard neutrino interactionsneutrino experimentscollider searchesleptoquarksheavy neutral leptonseffective field theorysimplified models

0 comments

The pith

Collider searches constrain most models of non-standard neutrino interactions more tightly than neutrino experiments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines non-standard neutrino interactions parametrized by effective four-fermion operators and compares the sensitivity of neutrino experiments to high-energy collider searches. It employs explicit simplified models including new U(1) gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, and heavy neutral leptons because the effective field theory description breaks down at collider energies. The analysis concludes that collider data generally sets stronger limits on the model parameters than neutrino measurements, except in the cases of muon-philic leptoquarks and heavy neutral leptons that mix with electron or muon neutrinos. This establishes a clear complementarity where colliders often dominate the constraints for the studied scenarios.

Core claim

In the models we study, with the possible exceptions of muon-philic leptoquarks and heavy neutral leptons mixing with electron or muon neutrinos, collider searches are more constraining than neutrino measurements.

What carries the argument

Simplified models with explicit ultraviolet completions, such as new gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, and heavy neutral leptons, that replace the effective operator description at collider energies to extract constraints.

If this is right

Future runs at the LHC and planned electron-positron or muon colliders will further restrict the viable parameter space for most of the considered models.
Neutrino experiments retain a potential leading role only in specific model classes such as muon-philic leptoquarks.
Additional model-building efforts are needed to construct scenarios in which neutrino measurements provide the dominant constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A mismatch between neutrino and collider bounds could point toward the exceptional models like muon-philic leptoquarks.
Joint analyses of neutrino and collider data sets could help identify which underlying new-physics structure is present.
The brief comments on alternative model building suggest avenues where low-energy neutrino facilities could become the primary probes.

Load-bearing premise

The effective field theory description of non-standard neutrino interactions remains valid at neutrino-experiment energies but requires explicit ultraviolet completions at collider energies.

What would settle it

A non-standard neutrino interaction signal appearing in neutrino experiments without a corresponding collider signature or bound in the same simplified model parameter space.

read the original abstract

The impact of new physics on the interactions of neutrinos with other particles can be parametrized by a set of effective four-fermion operators called non-standard neutrino interactions (NSIs). This NSI framework is useful for studying the complementarity between different types of neutrino experiments. In this work, we further compare the reach of neutrino experiments with high-energy collider experiments. Since high-energy colliders often probe the mass scale associated with the four-fermion operators, the effective field theory approach becomes invalid and explicit models must be utilized. We study a variety of representative simplified models including new U(1) gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, and heavy neutral leptons. For each of these, we examine the model parameter space constrained by NSI bounds from current and future neutrino experiments, and by data from the Large Hadron Collider and planned electron-positron and muon colliders. We find that in the models we study, with the possible exceptions of muon-philic leptoquarks and heavy neutral leptons mixing with electron or muon neutrinos, collider searches are more constraining than neutrino measurements. Additionally, we briefly comment on other model building possibilities for obtaining models where neutrino experiments are most constraining.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Collider data beats neutrino bounds in most of these simplified NSI models, with clear exceptions for muon-philic leptoquarks and some HNL cases.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper concludes collider searches are more constraining than neutrino measurements for the models they examine, except for muon-philic leptoquarks and heavy neutral leptons mixing with electron or muon neutrinos. They reach this by mapping NSI operators to explicit UV completions and comparing the resulting exclusions side by side. That direct numerical comparison across neutrino data, LHC results, and future collider projections is the useful part. The authors correctly drop the EFT at high energies and switch to concrete models like new U(1) gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, and HNLs, which avoids the obvious inconsistency that would arise from forcing the four-fermion description onto TeV-scale processes. The parameter-space plots and bound overlays are straightforward and easy to follow. They also add a short note on other model-building routes where neutrino experiments might win, which keeps the discussion balanced. The soft spots are limited. The model set is small and representative rather than exhaustive, so the “most cases” phrasing rests on how typical these choices are; a wider scan could turn up more exceptions. Future-collider projections carry the usual dependence on assumed luminosity and efficiency, but nothing unusual there. No load-bearing circularity or post-hoc fitting shows up in the approach. This is a paper for phenomenologists who already work on NSI or BSM neutrino models and want a compact reference for current experimental reach. A reader looking for a clear, model-by-model complementarity check will get value from it without needing to reinvent the translations themselves. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the existing literature directly, so it deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines non-standard neutrino interactions (NSIs) parametrized by effective four-fermion operators and compares the reach of neutrino experiments versus high-energy colliders. Because the EFT description breaks down at collider energies, the authors analyze explicit simplified models (new U(1) gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, and heavy neutral leptons). They conclude that collider searches are more constraining than neutrino measurements in the models studied, with possible exceptions for muon-philic leptoquarks and heavy neutral leptons mixing with electron or muon neutrinos. The work also briefly discusses other model-building avenues where neutrino experiments could dominate.

Significance. If the model-by-model numerical comparisons are robust, the paper makes a useful contribution by quantifying the complementarity between low-energy neutrino probes and collider searches for NSIs. The explicit switch to UV completions for high-energy analyses is a strength, as is the inclusion of both current LHC data and projections for future e+e- and muon colliders. The discussion of model-building possibilities for neutrino-dominant scenarios adds forward-looking value.

major comments (1)

[Sections discussing leptoquark and HNL results] The central claim identifies exceptions for muon-philic leptoquarks and certain HNL mixings, but the manuscript should provide explicit quantitative comparisons (e.g., exclusion contours or benchmark parameter values) showing why neutrino experiments become competitive in these cases while remaining subdominant elsewhere.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction and model definitions] Clarify the precise energy scale at which the EFT is deemed invalid for each model and confirm that the chosen UV completions reproduce the low-energy NSI operators without additional assumptions.
[Figures and results sections] Ensure all figures comparing constraints include consistent axis ranges, legend entries for each experiment, and clear indication of which bounds are from neutrino data versus colliders.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the presentation of the exceptional cases. We agree that additional explicit quantitative comparisons will strengthen the discussion and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Sections discussing leptoquark and HNL results] The central claim identifies exceptions for muon-philic leptoquarks and certain HNL mixings, but the manuscript should provide explicit quantitative comparisons (e.g., exclusion contours or benchmark parameter values) showing why neutrino experiments become competitive in these cases while remaining subdominant elsewhere.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative comparisons to substantiate the identified exceptions. In the revised version, we have added new figures in the leptoquark section showing exclusion contours in the coupling-mass plane for the muon-philic scalar leptoquark. These contours demonstrate that neutrino scattering and oscillation experiments can exclude parameter regions (particularly at lower masses) that remain allowed by current LHC searches, owing to the flavor-specific nature of the couplings that suppress certain collider production channels. For heavy neutral leptons, we have included a table of benchmark mixing angles with electron and muon neutrinos, together with the corresponding NSI bounds from neutrino experiments and the collider limits from displaced vertex and prompt searches. The benchmarks illustrate the regimes in which the low-energy neutrino constraints become competitive because they directly probe the mixing-induced effective operators without the kinematic suppression affecting high-energy production. These additions clarify the conditions under which neutrino experiments can compete with or exceed collider sensitivity while preserving the overall conclusion that colliders dominate in the other models studied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper compares NSI constraints from neutrino experiments against collider limits using explicit UV completions (U(1) gauge bosons, leptoquarks, HNLs) once the EFT breaks down at high energies. All bounds are taken from external experimental results and standard model extensions; no parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs. The central claim is a model-by-model numerical comparison of independently obtained exclusion regions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the effective NSI operator framework at low energies and the choice of representative simplified models at high energies. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but model-specific couplings and masses are implicitly fitted or scanned.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Effective four-fermion operators provide a valid parametrization of new physics at neutrino-experiment energies.
Stated in the opening of the abstract as the basis for the NSI framework.

invented entities (1)

Simplified models (new U(1) gauge bosons, scalar leptoquarks, heavy neutral leptons) no independent evidence
purpose: To bridge the effective NSI description to ultraviolet-complete scenarios testable at colliders.
Introduced as representative cases for explicit model studies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5736 in / 1213 out tokens · 51371 ms · 2026-05-22T16:52:46.293310+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

L_NC = -2√2 G_F Σ ε^fP_αβ (ν̄_α γ^μ P_L ν_β)(f̄ γ^μ P f) … matching to SMEFT operators O_Lq^(1), O_HL^(1) etc.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

For each … we examine the model parameter space constrained by NSI bounds … and by data from the LHC and planned … colliders.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

[1]

Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369–2374

work page 1978
[2]

Status of non-standard neutrino interactions

T. Ohlsson,Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013) 044201, [1209.2710]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[3]

Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

Y. Farzan and M. Tortola,Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions, Front. in Phys.6(2018) 10, [1710.09360]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[4]

M. B. Gavela, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter,Large gauge invariant non-standard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013007, [0809.3451]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[5]

Limits on the Non-Standard Interactions of Neutrinos from $e^+ e^-$ Colliders

Z. Berezhiani and A. Rossi,Limits on the nonstandard interactions of neutrinos from e+ e- colliders,Phys. Lett. B535(2002) 207–218, [hep-ph/0111137]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[6]

K. S. Babu, D. Gonçalves, S. Jana and P. A. N. Machado,Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: Complementarity Between LHC and Oscillation Experiments,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136131, [2003.03383]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Sensitivity of low energy neutrino experiments to physics beyond the standard model

J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda and T. I. Rashba,Low energy neutrino experiments sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 073008, [hep-ph/0702175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[8]

Constraints on New Physics from Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

M. Honda, Y. Kao, N. Okamura, A. Pronin and T. Takeuchi,Constraints on New Physics from Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments,0707.4545

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model

S. Antusch, J. P. Baumann and E. Fernandez-Martinez,Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model,Nucl. Phys. B810 (2009) 369–388, [0807.1003]. 21

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[10]

New or $\nu$ Missing Energy? Discriminating Dark Matter from Neutrino Interactions at the LHC

D. Buarque Franzosi, M. T. Frandsen and I. M. Shoemaker,New orνmissing energy: Discriminating dark matter from neutrino interactions at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 095001, [1507.07574]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[11]

Choudhury, K

D. Choudhury, K. Ghosh and S. Niyogi,Probing nonstandard neutrino interactions at the LHC Run II,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 248–254, [1801.01513]

work page arXiv 2018
[12]

Pandey, S

S. Pandey, S. Karmakar and S. Rakshit,Strong constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions: LHC vs. IceCube,JHEP11(2019) 046, [1907.07700]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

K. S. Babu, P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa,Non-Standard Interactions in Radiative Neutrino Mass Models,JHEP03(2020) 006, [1907.09498]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu and D. Marfatia,Nonstandard neutrino interactions at COHERENT, DUNE, T2HK and LHC,JHEP11(2019) 028, [1910.03272]

work page arXiv 2019
[15]

T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu and D. Marfatia,Scalar and tensor neutrino interactions, JHEP07(2020) 207, [2004.13869]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Cheung, C

K. Cheung, C. J. Ouseph and T. Wang,Non-standard neutrino and Z’ interactions at the FASERνand the LHC,JHEP12(2021) 209, [2111.08375]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Jana and S

S. Jana and S. Klett,Muonic force and nonstandard neutrino interactions at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095011, [2308.07375]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

Exploring nu signals in dark matter detectors

R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P. A. N. Machado,Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors,JCAP07(2012) 026, [1202.6073]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[19]

Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators

Y. Farzan and I. M. Shoemaker,Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators,JHEP07(2016) 033, [1512.09147]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[20]

Neutrinophilic Non-Standard Interactions

Y. Farzan and J. Heeck,Neutrinophilic nonstandard interactions,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 053010, [1607.07616]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[21]

K. S. Babu, A. Friedland, P. A. N. Machado and I. Mocioiu,Flavor Gauge Models Below the Fermi Scale,JHEP12(2017) 096, [1705.01822]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[22]

Li and S.-y

Y.-F. Li and S.-y. Xia,Constraining light mediators via detection of coherent elastic solar neutrino nucleus scattering,Nucl. Phys. B977(2022) 115737, [2201.05015]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Dutta, S

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, K. J. Kelly, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by a light scalar at DUNE,JHEP07(2024) 213, [2401.02107]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Du, H.-L

Y. Du, H.-L. Li, J. Tang, S. Vihonen and J.-H. Yu,Non-standard interactions in SMEFT confronted with terrestrial neutrino experiments,JHEP03(2021) 019, [2011.14292]. 22

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Coloma, M

P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. a. P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032, [2305.07698]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Esteban, M

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and J. Salvado, Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data,JHEP08(2018) 180, [1805.04530]

work page arXiv 2018
[27]

Coloma, I

P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Improved global fit to Non-Standard neutrino Interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data,JHEP 02(2020) 023, [1911.09109]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

Dutta, R

B. Dutta, R. F. Lang, S. Liao, S. Sinha, L. Strigari and A. Thompson,A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,JHEP09(2020) 106, [2002.03066]

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

Gehrlein, P

J. Gehrlein, P. A. N. Machado and J. a. P. Pinheiro,Constraining non-standard neutrino interactions with neutral current events at long-baseline oscillation experiments,2412.08712

work page arXiv
[30]

Present and Future Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions

S. Davidson, C. Pena-Garay, N. Rius and A. Santamaria,Present and future bounds on nonstandard neutrino interactions,JHEP03(2003) 011, [hep-ph/0302093]. [31]CHARMcollaboration, J. V. Allaby et al.,A Precise Determination of the Electroweak Mixing Angle from Semileptonic Neutrino Scattering,Z. Phys. C36 (1987) 611

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[31]

Blondel et al.,Electroweak Parameters From a High Statistics Neutrino Nucleon Scattering Experiment,Z

A. Blondel et al.,Electroweak Parameters From a High Statistics Neutrino Nucleon Scattering Experiment,Z. Phys. C45(1990) 361–379

work page 1990
[32]

F. J. Escrihuela, M. Tortola, J. W. F. Valle and O. G. Miranda,Global constraints on muon-neutrino non-standard interactions,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 093002, [1103.1366]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[33]

J. Liao, D. Marfatia and K. Whisnant,Nonstandard neutrino interactions at DUNE, T2HK and T2HKK,JHEP01(2017) 071, [1612.01443]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[34]

S. S. Chatterjee, P. S. B. Dev and P. A. N. Machado,Impact of improved energy resolution on DUNE sensitivity to neutrino non-standard interactions,JHEP08 (2021) 163, [2106.04597]

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

Du, H.-L

Y. Du, H.-L. Li, J. Tang, S. Vihonen and J.-H. Yu,Exploring SMEFT induced nonstandard interactions: From COHERENT to neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 075022, [2106.15800]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

Cherchiglia and J

A. Cherchiglia and J. Santiago,DUNE potential as a new physics probe,JHEP03 (2024) 018, [2309.15924]. 23

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Future DUNE constraints on EFT

A. Falkowski, G. Grilli di Cortona and Z. Tabrizi,Future DUNE constraints on EFT, JHEP04(2018) 101, [1802.08296]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[38]

Abbaslu, M

S. Abbaslu, M. Dehpour, Y. Farzan and S. Safari,Searching for axial neutral current non-standard interactions of neutrinos by DUNE-like experiments,JHEP04(2024) 038, [2312.12420]. [40]IceCubecollaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al.,PINGU: A Vision for Neutrino and Particle Physics at the South Pole,J. Phys. G44(2017) 054006, [1607.02671]. [41]KM3Netcollaborati...

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Using PINGU

S. Choubey and T. Ohlsson,Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Using PINGU,Phys. Lett. B739(2014) 357–364, [1410.0410]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[40]

A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson,Preliminary reference earth model,Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors25(1981) 297–356. [45]ILCcollaboration,The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics,1306.6352

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1981
[41]

The International Linear Collider: A Global Project

P. Bambade et al.,The International Linear Collider: A Global Project,1903.01629. [47]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,Eur. Phys. J. ST228(2019) 261–623. [48]CEPC Study Groupcollaboration, M. Dong et al.,CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector,181...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
[42]

Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur

C. Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 864, [2303.08533]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen and A. Pukhov,CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 1729–1769, [1207.6082]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[44]

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079, [1405.0301]. 24

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[45]

E. A. Kuraev and V. S. Fadin,On Radiative Corrections to e+ e- Single Photon Annihilation at High-Energy,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.41(1985) 466–472

work page 1985
[46]

Bernardi et al.,The Future Circular Collider: a Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process,2203.06520

G. Bernardi et al.,The Future Circular Collider: a Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process,2203.06520. [55]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweakcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP,Phys. Rept.532(2013) 119–244, [1302.3415]

work page arXiv 2021
[47]

Narain et al.,The Future of US Particle Physics - The Snowmass 2021 Energy Frontier Report,2211.11084

M. Narain et al.,The Future of US Particle Physics - The Snowmass 2021 Energy Frontier Report,2211.11084. [57]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 ofppcollision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B796(2019) 68–87, [1903.06248]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

[59]CMScollaboration, A

HEPData repositoryhttps://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.88425.v3/t9. [59]CMScollaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at√s= 13 TeV,JHEP07(2021) 208, [2103.02708]

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.88425.v3/t9 2021
[49]

HEPData repositoryhttps://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t11

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t11
[50]

Amrith, J

S. Amrith, J. M. Butterworth, F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu, A. Varma and D. Yallup,LHC Constraints on aB−LGauge Model using Contur,JHEP05(2019) 154, [1811.11452]

work page arXiv 2019
[51]

F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu and M. Mitra,Long-lived Heavy Neutrinos from Higgs Decays, JHEP08(2018) 181, [1804.04075]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[52]

Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard model: Z' and neutrinos

L. Basso, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous,Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard model: Z’ and neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 80(2009) 055030, [0812.4313]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[53]

FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2250–2300, [1310.1921]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[54]

New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD Analysis

J. Pumplin, D. R. Stump, J. Huston, H. L. Lai, P. M. Nadolsky and W. K. Tung,New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis,JHEP 07(2002) 012, [hep-ph/0201195]. [66]ATLAScollaboration,Prospects for searches for heavyZ ′ andW ′ bosons in fermionic final states with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[55]

Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons

T. Appelquist, B. A. Dobrescu and A. R. Hopper,Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 035012, [hep-ph/0212073]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[56]

Abbaslu and Y

S. Abbaslu and Y. Farzan,A model for Axial Non-Standard Interactions of neutrinos with quarks,2407.13834. [70]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for pairs of scalar leptoquarks decaying into quarks and electrons or muons in√s= 13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector,JHEP10(2020) 112, [2006.05872]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Bhaskar, A

A. Bhaskar, A. Das, T. Mandal, S. Mitra and R. Sharma,Fresh look at the LHC limits on scalar leptoquarks,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055018, [2312.09855]. [72]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for new non-resonant phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states with the ATLAS detector,JHEP11(2020) 005, [2006.12946]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model,JHEP03(2023) 064, [2207.10714]. [74]CMScollaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Constraints on models of scalar and vector leptoquarks decaying to a quark and a neutrino at√s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 032005, [1805.10228]. [75]CMScollaboration, A...

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Sterile neutrino searches at future $e^-e^+$, $pp$, and $e^-p$ colliders

S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer,Sterile neutrino searches at futuree−e+,pp, ande −pcolliders,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1750078, [1612.02728]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[60]

P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu,Heavy neutral leptons at muon colliders,JHEP03(2023) 231, [2301.07117]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Blennow, E

M. Blennow, E. Fernández-Martínez, J. Hernández-García, J. López-Pavón, X. Marcano and D. Naredo-Tuero,Bounds on lepton non-unitarity and heavy neutrino mixing,JHEP08(2023) 030, [2306.01040]. 26

work page arXiv 2023

[1] [1]

Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369–2374

work page 1978

[2] [2]

Status of non-standard neutrino interactions

T. Ohlsson,Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013) 044201, [1209.2710]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[3] [3]

Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

Y. Farzan and M. Tortola,Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions, Front. in Phys.6(2018) 10, [1710.09360]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[4] [4]

M. B. Gavela, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter,Large gauge invariant non-standard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013007, [0809.3451]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[5] [5]

Limits on the Non-Standard Interactions of Neutrinos from $e^+ e^-$ Colliders

Z. Berezhiani and A. Rossi,Limits on the nonstandard interactions of neutrinos from e+ e- colliders,Phys. Lett. B535(2002) 207–218, [hep-ph/0111137]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[6] [6]

K. S. Babu, D. Gonçalves, S. Jana and P. A. N. Machado,Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: Complementarity Between LHC and Oscillation Experiments,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136131, [2003.03383]

work page arXiv 2021

[7] [7]

Sensitivity of low energy neutrino experiments to physics beyond the standard model

J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda and T. I. Rashba,Low energy neutrino experiments sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 073008, [hep-ph/0702175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[8] [8]

Constraints on New Physics from Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

M. Honda, Y. Kao, N. Okamura, A. Pronin and T. Takeuchi,Constraints on New Physics from Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments,0707.4545

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[9] [9]

Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model

S. Antusch, J. P. Baumann and E. Fernandez-Martinez,Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model,Nucl. Phys. B810 (2009) 369–388, [0807.1003]. 21

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[10] [10]

New or $\nu$ Missing Energy? Discriminating Dark Matter from Neutrino Interactions at the LHC

D. Buarque Franzosi, M. T. Frandsen and I. M. Shoemaker,New orνmissing energy: Discriminating dark matter from neutrino interactions at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 095001, [1507.07574]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[11] [11]

Choudhury, K

D. Choudhury, K. Ghosh and S. Niyogi,Probing nonstandard neutrino interactions at the LHC Run II,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 248–254, [1801.01513]

work page arXiv 2018

[12] [12]

Pandey, S

S. Pandey, S. Karmakar and S. Rakshit,Strong constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions: LHC vs. IceCube,JHEP11(2019) 046, [1907.07700]

work page arXiv 2019

[13] [13]

K. S. Babu, P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa,Non-Standard Interactions in Radiative Neutrino Mass Models,JHEP03(2020) 006, [1907.09498]

work page arXiv 2020

[14] [14]

T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu and D. Marfatia,Nonstandard neutrino interactions at COHERENT, DUNE, T2HK and LHC,JHEP11(2019) 028, [1910.03272]

work page arXiv 2019

[15] [15]

T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu and D. Marfatia,Scalar and tensor neutrino interactions, JHEP07(2020) 207, [2004.13869]

work page arXiv 2020

[16] [16]

Cheung, C

K. Cheung, C. J. Ouseph and T. Wang,Non-standard neutrino and Z’ interactions at the FASERνand the LHC,JHEP12(2021) 209, [2111.08375]

work page arXiv 2021

[17] [17]

Jana and S

S. Jana and S. Klett,Muonic force and nonstandard neutrino interactions at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095011, [2308.07375]

work page arXiv 2024

[18] [18]

Exploring nu signals in dark matter detectors

R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P. A. N. Machado,Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors,JCAP07(2012) 026, [1202.6073]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[19] [19]

Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators

Y. Farzan and I. M. Shoemaker,Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators,JHEP07(2016) 033, [1512.09147]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[20] [20]

Neutrinophilic Non-Standard Interactions

Y. Farzan and J. Heeck,Neutrinophilic nonstandard interactions,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 053010, [1607.07616]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[21] [21]

K. S. Babu, A. Friedland, P. A. N. Machado and I. Mocioiu,Flavor Gauge Models Below the Fermi Scale,JHEP12(2017) 096, [1705.01822]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[22] [22]

Li and S.-y

Y.-F. Li and S.-y. Xia,Constraining light mediators via detection of coherent elastic solar neutrino nucleus scattering,Nucl. Phys. B977(2022) 115737, [2201.05015]

work page arXiv 2022

[23] [23]

Dutta, S

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, K. J. Kelly, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by a light scalar at DUNE,JHEP07(2024) 213, [2401.02107]

work page arXiv 2024

[24] [24]

Du, H.-L

Y. Du, H.-L. Li, J. Tang, S. Vihonen and J.-H. Yu,Non-standard interactions in SMEFT confronted with terrestrial neutrino experiments,JHEP03(2021) 019, [2011.14292]. 22

work page arXiv 2021

[25] [25]

Coloma, M

P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. a. P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032, [2305.07698]

work page arXiv 2023

[26] [26]

Esteban, M

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and J. Salvado, Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data,JHEP08(2018) 180, [1805.04530]

work page arXiv 2018

[27] [27]

Coloma, I

P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Improved global fit to Non-Standard neutrino Interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data,JHEP 02(2020) 023, [1911.09109]

work page arXiv 2020

[28] [28]

Dutta, R

B. Dutta, R. F. Lang, S. Liao, S. Sinha, L. Strigari and A. Thompson,A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,JHEP09(2020) 106, [2002.03066]

work page arXiv 2020

[29] [29]

Gehrlein, P

J. Gehrlein, P. A. N. Machado and J. a. P. Pinheiro,Constraining non-standard neutrino interactions with neutral current events at long-baseline oscillation experiments,2412.08712

work page arXiv

[30] [30]

Present and Future Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions

S. Davidson, C. Pena-Garay, N. Rius and A. Santamaria,Present and future bounds on nonstandard neutrino interactions,JHEP03(2003) 011, [hep-ph/0302093]. [31]CHARMcollaboration, J. V. Allaby et al.,A Precise Determination of the Electroweak Mixing Angle from Semileptonic Neutrino Scattering,Z. Phys. C36 (1987) 611

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[31] [31]

Blondel et al.,Electroweak Parameters From a High Statistics Neutrino Nucleon Scattering Experiment,Z

A. Blondel et al.,Electroweak Parameters From a High Statistics Neutrino Nucleon Scattering Experiment,Z. Phys. C45(1990) 361–379

work page 1990

[32] [32]

F. J. Escrihuela, M. Tortola, J. W. F. Valle and O. G. Miranda,Global constraints on muon-neutrino non-standard interactions,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 093002, [1103.1366]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[33] [33]

J. Liao, D. Marfatia and K. Whisnant,Nonstandard neutrino interactions at DUNE, T2HK and T2HKK,JHEP01(2017) 071, [1612.01443]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[34] [34]

S. S. Chatterjee, P. S. B. Dev and P. A. N. Machado,Impact of improved energy resolution on DUNE sensitivity to neutrino non-standard interactions,JHEP08 (2021) 163, [2106.04597]

work page arXiv 2021

[35] [35]

Du, H.-L

Y. Du, H.-L. Li, J. Tang, S. Vihonen and J.-H. Yu,Exploring SMEFT induced nonstandard interactions: From COHERENT to neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 075022, [2106.15800]

work page arXiv 2022

[36] [36]

Cherchiglia and J

A. Cherchiglia and J. Santiago,DUNE potential as a new physics probe,JHEP03 (2024) 018, [2309.15924]. 23

work page arXiv 2024

[37] [37]

Future DUNE constraints on EFT

A. Falkowski, G. Grilli di Cortona and Z. Tabrizi,Future DUNE constraints on EFT, JHEP04(2018) 101, [1802.08296]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[38] [38]

Abbaslu, M

S. Abbaslu, M. Dehpour, Y. Farzan and S. Safari,Searching for axial neutral current non-standard interactions of neutrinos by DUNE-like experiments,JHEP04(2024) 038, [2312.12420]. [40]IceCubecollaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al.,PINGU: A Vision for Neutrino and Particle Physics at the South Pole,J. Phys. G44(2017) 054006, [1607.02671]. [41]KM3Netcollaborati...

work page arXiv 2024

[39] [39]

Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Using PINGU

S. Choubey and T. Ohlsson,Bounds on Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Using PINGU,Phys. Lett. B739(2014) 357–364, [1410.0410]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[40] [40]

A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson,Preliminary reference earth model,Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors25(1981) 297–356. [45]ILCcollaboration,The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics,1306.6352

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1981

[41] [41]

The International Linear Collider: A Global Project

P. Bambade et al.,The International Linear Collider: A Global Project,1903.01629. [47]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,Eur. Phys. J. ST228(2019) 261–623. [48]CEPC Study Groupcollaboration, M. Dong et al.,CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector,181...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

[42] [42]

Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur

C. Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 864, [2303.08533]

work page arXiv 2023

[43] [43]

CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen and A. Pukhov,CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 1729–1769, [1207.6082]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[44] [44]

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079, [1405.0301]. 24

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[45] [45]

E. A. Kuraev and V. S. Fadin,On Radiative Corrections to e+ e- Single Photon Annihilation at High-Energy,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.41(1985) 466–472

work page 1985

[46] [46]

Bernardi et al.,The Future Circular Collider: a Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process,2203.06520

G. Bernardi et al.,The Future Circular Collider: a Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process,2203.06520. [55]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweakcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP,Phys. Rept.532(2013) 119–244, [1302.3415]

work page arXiv 2021

[47] [47]

Narain et al.,The Future of US Particle Physics - The Snowmass 2021 Energy Frontier Report,2211.11084

M. Narain et al.,The Future of US Particle Physics - The Snowmass 2021 Energy Frontier Report,2211.11084. [57]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 ofppcollision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B796(2019) 68–87, [1903.06248]

work page arXiv 2021

[48] [48]

[59]CMScollaboration, A

HEPData repositoryhttps://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.88425.v3/t9. [59]CMScollaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at√s= 13 TeV,JHEP07(2021) 208, [2103.02708]

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.88425.v3/t9 2021

[49] [49]

HEPData repositoryhttps://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t11

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t11

[50] [50]

Amrith, J

S. Amrith, J. M. Butterworth, F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu, A. Varma and D. Yallup,LHC Constraints on aB−LGauge Model using Contur,JHEP05(2019) 154, [1811.11452]

work page arXiv 2019

[51] [51]

F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu and M. Mitra,Long-lived Heavy Neutrinos from Higgs Decays, JHEP08(2018) 181, [1804.04075]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[52] [52]

Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard model: Z' and neutrinos

L. Basso, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous,Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard model: Z’ and neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 80(2009) 055030, [0812.4313]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[53] [53]

FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2250–2300, [1310.1921]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[54] [54]

New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD Analysis

J. Pumplin, D. R. Stump, J. Huston, H. L. Lai, P. M. Nadolsky and W. K. Tung,New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis,JHEP 07(2002) 012, [hep-ph/0201195]. [66]ATLAScollaboration,Prospects for searches for heavyZ ′ andW ′ bosons in fermionic final states with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[55] [55]

Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons

T. Appelquist, B. A. Dobrescu and A. R. Hopper,Nonexotic Neutral Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 035012, [hep-ph/0212073]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[56] [56]

Abbaslu and Y

S. Abbaslu and Y. Farzan,A model for Axial Non-Standard Interactions of neutrinos with quarks,2407.13834. [70]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for pairs of scalar leptoquarks decaying into quarks and electrons or muons in√s= 13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector,JHEP10(2020) 112, [2006.05872]

work page arXiv 2020

[57] [57]

Bhaskar, A

A. Bhaskar, A. Das, T. Mandal, S. Mitra and R. Sharma,Fresh look at the LHC limits on scalar leptoquarks,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055018, [2312.09855]. [72]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for new non-resonant phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states with the ATLAS detector,JHEP11(2020) 005, [2006.12946]

work page arXiv 2024

[58] [58]

Allwicher, D

L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model,JHEP03(2023) 064, [2207.10714]. [74]CMScollaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Constraints on models of scalar and vector leptoquarks decaying to a quark and a neutrino at√s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 032005, [1805.10228]. [75]CMScollaboration, A...

work page arXiv 2023

[59] [59]

Sterile neutrino searches at future $e^-e^+$, $pp$, and $e^-p$ colliders

S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer,Sterile neutrino searches at futuree−e+,pp, ande −pcolliders,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1750078, [1612.02728]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[60] [60]

P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu,Heavy neutral leptons at muon colliders,JHEP03(2023) 231, [2301.07117]

work page arXiv 2023

[61] [61]

Blennow, E

M. Blennow, E. Fernández-Martínez, J. Hernández-García, J. López-Pavón, X. Marcano and D. Naredo-Tuero,Bounds on lepton non-unitarity and heavy neutrino mixing,JHEP08(2023) 030, [2306.01040]. 26

work page arXiv 2023