Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 61 references

Emergent heavy-fermion physics in a new family of topological insulators RAsS (R = Y, La, and Sm)

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read SmAsS and YAsS are topological crystalline insulators whose glide-protected hourglass surface states survive f-electron correlations.

desk verdict A solid TCI classification for Y/SmAsS with corrected structures, but the heavy-fermion claim for SmAsS is under-evidenced and the AFM order is never squared with the TRS-protected surface states. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01511 v1 pith:ND4JPIFG submitted 2025-05-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords heavy-fermiontopologicalcrystallineinsulatorhourglassfermionsglidesymmetryZ4indicatorSmAsSYAsAndersonlatticemodelKondophysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the rare-earth arsenic sulfides YAsS and SmAsS are topological crystalline insulators whose nontrivial topology is enforced not by spin-orbit coupling but by a glide symmetry of the orthorhombic Pnma structure. The central result is that SmAsS combines this crystalline topology with heavy-fermion behavior, as signaled by a measured Sommerfeld coefficient of $\gamma = 160$ mJ mol$^{-1}$ Sm K$^{-2}$, placing it in the small class of materials, alongside SmB$_6$ and YbB$_{12}$, where topological surface states coexist with Kondo-like correlations. Using high-resolution synchrotron diffraction, the paper corrects a decades-old monoclinic structural assignment, derives a $Z_4 = 2$ symmetry indicator, and predicts hourglass fermions on the (011) surface. A minimal Anderson-lattice model reproduces the topology and predicts that the hourglass surface states survive the f-electron correlations, shifted downward in energy. If correct, this establishes a new family in which crystalline symmetry and strong correlations work together, and makes SmAsS a concrete target for photoemission checks.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hourglass fermion protected by the nonsymmorphic glide $\{m_x|\tfrac12\tfrac12\tfrac12\}$ in space group Pnma. Along a glide-invariant line, Kramers pairs at the zone center have the same glide eigenvalue while at the zone boundary they have opposite eigenvalues ($\pm i$), so the bands are forced to cross in an hourglass shape that cannot be removed without breaking the glide. This protection is quantified by the $Z_4$ symmetry indicator, which takes the value 2 in YAsS and SmAsS. The argumentative engine is a layer construction: two glide-related As monolayers, each a $Z_2 = 1$ two-dimensional topological insulator, coupled by interlayer hoppings, reproduce the drumhead and hourglass surface spectra; for SmAsS the same model is extended by an Anderson-lattice term with an infinite-$U$ constraint solved at saddle point.

What would settle it

If high-resolution ARPES on a glide-preserving (011) surface of YAsS or SmAsS shows no hourglass-shaped crossing in the surface Brillouin zone along $\bar{\Gamma}{-}\bar{Y}$ or $\bar{X}{-}\bar{S}$, the central claim fails. Equivalently, a synchrotron refinement that fits the data equally well in the previously reported monoclinic space group P1121/n would remove the glide symmetry that the $Z_4 = 2$ indicator requires, and the hourglass prediction would not follow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that SmAsS and YAsS are glide-symmetry-protected topological crystalline insulators, with SmAsS additionally a heavy-fermion candidate. The load-bearing invariant is $Z_4 = 2$, obtained from inversion eigenvalues at $\Gamma$ and $U$; in the nonmagnetic Pnma setting this indicator forces hourglass surface states along the $k_x = 0$ (and $\pi$) glide-invariant planes. Without spin-orbit coupling, the same $Z_4 = 2$ gives $z'_2 = 1$ nodal lines, which appear as drumhead surface states. The paper shows that the topological bands come from As $p_z$ and $p_y$ orbitals arranged in two glide-related layers, each a $Z_2 = 1$ two-dimensional topological insulator; coupling them with the glide produces the hourglass. Including the Sm 4f electrons as an Anderson lattice at saddle-point level leaves the $Z_4 = 2$ invariant unchanged, so the f-states do not destroy the surface states but shift the topological gap downward by roughly 0.4 eV.

Load-bearing premise

The whole hourglass prediction rests on the newly assigned orthorhombic Pnma structure for Y/SmAsS (and Pmnb for LaAsS); if the true symmetry were the previously reported monoclinic P1121/n, the glide that protects the surface states would not exist and the $Z_4 = 2$ indicator would not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Angle-resolved photoemission on the (011) surface of SmAsS should reveal hourglass surface bands, shifted roughly 0.4 eV closer to the Fermi level by the f-electron states, making the predicted states spectroscopically accessible.
  • SmAsS becomes a third platform, after SmB$_6$ and YbB$_{12}$, where topological surface states and Kondo coherence coexist, but with topology enforced by crystalline glide symmetry rather than by parity alone.
  • LaAsS sits close to a topological transition: its experimental structure gives $Z_4 = 2$ while the optimized structure gives $Z_4 = 0$, so modest strain or pressure could switch it into or out of the hourglass phase.
  • The minimal two-layer model transfers to other ZrSiS-type square-net materials with the same As $p_z$/$p_y$ orbital content, predicting where hourglass fermions should appear in that broader family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test is to measure the (011) surface with photoemission at low temperature: if the hourglass dispersion is absent while the bulk remains semiconducting, the symmetry-indicator prediction would be ruled out.
  • Because SmAsS orders antiferromagnetically near 7.5 K, the paper's paramagnetic model leaves open whether the hourglass states survive in the magnetic phase; measuring the surface spectrum below $T_N$ would test whether the glide remains a good symmetry there.
  • The structural correction suggests that other members of the RAsS family reported forty years ago as monoclinic may deserve re-examination; compounds with heavier or magnetic rare earths could realize the same hourglass phase with different correlation strengths.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental and computational study of the RAsS family (R = Y, La, Sm). Using synchrotron powder and single-crystal diffraction, the authors re-determine the crystal structures: YAsS and SmAsS crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (SmAsS type), while LaAsS adopts a √2×√2 in-plane modulation (GdPS type). From DFT and topological quantum chemistry, they show that YAsS and SmAsS have Z4=2 symmetry indicators and predict glide-protected hourglass fermions on the (0-11) surface, whereas LaAsS is near a topological transition. A minimal two-orbital tight-binding model reproduces the topological band structure, and an Anderson-lattice model with strongly correlated Sm 4f electrons indicates that the hourglass surface states persist in the correlated regime, shifted in energy. Resistivity and specific-heat measurements are reported; SmAsS is claimed to show a large Sommerfeld coefficient γ=160 mJ mol−1 K−2, which the authors interpret as evidence of heavy-fermion physics.

Significance. If the structural assignment and the specific-heat analysis hold, this family would constitute a new platform for correlated topological crystalline insulators, and the demonstration that hourglass surface states survive in a saddle-point Anderson-lattice treatment would be a valuable step beyond weakly correlated TCI classification. The paper makes good use of standard symmetry-indicator tools (Vasp2trace, Bilbao server, WannierTools) and the minimal model is constructed transparently from Wannier functions, making the symmetry-indicator part reproducible. The prediction that LaAsS is close to a topological transition is a concrete, falsifiable statement. The central limitations are that the heavy-fermion claim rests on a single undocumented specific-heat value and that the topological surface-state calculation assumes a paramagnetic, time-reversal-symmetric state for a compound that orders antiferromagnetically at 7.5 K.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II and Sec. VII B] The central experimental evidence for heavy-fermion behavior is the quoted value γ=160 mJ mol−1 Sm K−2, but no specific-heat analysis is shown: there is no C(T) curve, no C/T versus T^2 plot, no lattice subtraction using the nonmagnetic YAsS analog, no nuclear-Schottky correction, no error bar, and no statement of whether the value is obtained at H=0 or H=9 T or in which temperature interval. Because SmAsS orders antiferromagnetically at T_N≈7.5 K and the data extend down to 0.4 K, the C/T ratio below T_N can contain substantial contributions from AFM spin waves and nuclear Schottky tails. The authors must present the extraction of γ and demonstrate that it is a genuine linear electronic term, or else the heavy-fermion conclusion should be correspondingly qualified.
  2. [Sec. IV and Sec. VI] The DFT, symmetry-indicator, and Anderson-lattice calculations all assume a paramagnetic, time-reversal-symmetric state, yet SmAsS orders antiferromagnetically at about 7.5 K (Fig. 1d). The paper does not discuss whether the AFM order breaks the glide+TRS protection that produces the hourglass fermions, nor whether the surface states survive below T_N. Without this discussion, the claim that SmAsS is a heavy-fermion topological crystalline insulator in the experimentally relevant low-temperature state is not established; at minimum the surface-state prediction should be explicitly stated to apply to the paramagnetic phase, and the fate of the hourglass states below T_N should be addressed.
  3. [Sec. II and Appendix C, Table S.IV] The assignment to space group Pnma is load-bearing for the Z4=2 indicator and the hourglass-fermion prediction. The authors state that laboratory diffraction was insufficient and that only synchrotron data allowed unambiguous identification, but the main text shows only one selected diffraction region. Given the near-equal twin ratio reported for YAsS (0.518:0.482) and the previously reported monoclinic angle very close to 90° (γ=90.26°–90.37°), a direct comparison of the Pnma refinement against the monoclinic P1121/n model (or an equivalent pseudomerohedral twin model) is needed to exclude the possibility that the orthorhombic model is an average over twinned monoclinic domains. The authors should report the residual factors, goodness of fit, and reflection-splitting criteria for both structural models.
  4. [Sec. IV A and Sec. VII A] The Anderson-lattice calculation is presented as showing that 'the surface states persist despite f-electron interactions and shift downward in energy'. Because the itinerant Hamiltonian h(k) is the Wannier model fitted to the same DFT bands whose topology is being tested, and the parameters ε_f, V, and Q are chosen to pin the f-level at the Fermi level, the calculation is a consistency check for this parameter set in the saddle-point approximation rather than a parameter-free robustness proof. This should be stated explicitly, and the sensitivity of the result to the chosen parameters (particularly V and ε_f) should be described so that the reader can gauge how general the predicted robustness is.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. II] The sentence 'Note that the calculations haven been done using the standard Pnma setting' contains a typo: 'haven' should be 'have'.
  2. [Sec. VII B] The Methods section contains an incomplete sentence: 'For YAsS and SmAsS, single crystal diffraction data were collected using with Mo...' This should be completed or rephrased.
  3. [Sec. VI] In the Conclusions, the formula 'YB12' should be written as 'YbB12' to match the standard notation used in the Introduction and References.
  4. [Sec. III A and Appendix B] The symbol λ is used both for the spin-orbit coupling parameter (Sec. III B) and for the Lagrange multiplier enforcing the f-electron constraint (Sec. IV A, Eq. (2)). These should be renamed to avoid confusion, for example λ_SOC and λ_constraint.
  5. [Sec. III B and III C] The Wilson-loop integration directions are described separately for the monolayer and bilayer models; for clarity, please state explicitly in one place which momentum direction is integrated and which is the loop parameter in each case, and match this to the axes of Fig. 4c and 4d.
  6. [Table I and Table II] The notation for irreps (e.g., '4Γ+1⊕1Γ−1⊕...') is compressed; a one-sentence explanation of how the inversion-eigenvalue imbalance is converted to the Z4 indicator would help non-specialist readers follow the symmetry analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the topological classification is first-principles DFT/TQC, and the correlated model is a consistency check, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The central topological claims (Z4=2 for YAsS and SmAsS, and the resulting hourglass surface states) are computed from DFT band structures through irrep decomposition (Table I) and the Fu-Kane-like formula in Eq. (1), using standard external codes (VASP, FPLO, WannierTools, MagneticTB, Bilbao Crystallographic Server). This derivation does not use the target result as an input. The minimal tight-binding model is a Wannier interpolation of the same DFT bands and is explicitly used to reproduce and validate the DFT topology, not to generate it from independent assumptions; the paper states it 'reproduces the observed topological properties.' The Anderson-lattice calculation (Eq. (2)) takes that h(k) as input and is framed as a check—'probe the robustness of the topology and validate our DFT results'—and the finding that the gaps and surface states persist at r=0.805 is a computed output, not an input by construction. The measured Sommerfeld coefficient gamma=160 mJ/mol K^2 is an independent experimental input; its underdocumented extraction is an evidence and transparency concern, not circularity. The self-citations present (e.g., Refs. 13 and 49) are background or methodological citations and are not load-bearing for the RAsS claims. No quoted equation or fitted parameter reduces to the predicted quantity, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's 'predictions' for SmAsS are tied to a model fitted to the same DFT band structure used to establish the topology; the free parameters are dominated by Wannier-derived hoppings and ad hoc correlation parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; the hourglass fermion is an established quasiparticle.

free parameters (4)
  • Minimal-model monolayer hoppings t and r = pz-pz / pz-py / py-py: t = 0.851 / 1.949 / 1.325 eV; r = 0.981 / 1.368 / 0.671 eV
    Extracted from Wannier interpolation of the YAsS DFT bands; the model's topology depends on these values, though the Z2 invariant is robust to moderate changes.
  • Interlayer couplings v = pz-pz 1.013, pz-py 0.248, py-pz 0.440, py-py 0.949 meV
    Nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping obtained from Wannierization; used to build the bilayer model.
  • SOC parameter lambda = 0.5 eV
    Set 'to open a substantial gap and clearly resolve the surface states'; larger than the actual DFT SOC, so surface dispersion widths are illustrative.
  • Anderson-lattice parameters epsilon_f, V, mu, Q = epsilon_f = -1 eV, V = 1 eV, mu = 0, Q = 8
    Ad hoc choices; Q=8 imposes half-filling and pins the f level to the Fermi energy, which drives the Kondo resonance in the saddle-point solution.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Z4=2 symmetry indicator corresponds to z'_2=1 and to glide-protected hourglass fermions in space group Pnma.
    The paper relies on the established classification (refs 37, 38, 44) without re-deriving it; if the correspondence were different, the surface-state prediction would not follow.
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA-PBE + mBJ + SOC reliably gives the band ordering and symmetry eigenvalues for RAsS.
    No experimental band structure is shown; the topological indicators are only as good as the DFT occupations and exchange-correlation approximation.
  • domain assumption The infinite-U Anderson lattice in the auxiliary-boson saddle-point approximation captures the relevant Kondo correlations of SmAsS.
    Standard large-N method (refs 18, 48, 49); the paper uses it without benchmarking against other correlated methods or experimental spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper SmAsS can be treated as non-magnetic with TRS even though it orders antiferromagnetically at 7.5 K.
    Fig 1d shows an AFM anomaly at 7.5 K, but Sections III and IV assume TRS and never discuss the magnetic ground state; this is a silent assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The YAsS-derived tight-binding model (hoppings and structure) is transferable to SmAsS.
    Section IV A states the As 4p weights are similar, but the model parameters are not re-fitted for SmAsS.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent heavy-fermion physics in a new family of topological insulators RAsS (R = Y, La, and Sm)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ND4JPIFG

@misc{pith2026250501511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent heavy-fermion physics in a new family of topological insulators RAsS (R = Y, La, and Sm)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ND4JPIFG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01511}
}
abstract

Realizing topological phases in strongly correlated materials has become a major impetus in condensed matter physics. Although many compounds are now classified as topological insulators, $f$-electron systems (with their strong electron correlations) provide an especially fertile platform for emergent heavy-fermion phenomena driven by the interplay of topology and many-body effects. In this study, we examine the crystalline topology of a new RAsS series (R = Y, La, Sm), revealing a structural variant from previous reports. We demonstrate that YAsS and SmAsS host hourglass fermions protected by glide symmetry. SmAsS notably exhibits a strong effective-mass enhancement, placing it alongside SmB${}_6$ and YbB${}_{12}$ as a material that couples topological surface states with emergent Kondo physics, yet distinguished by its crystalline symmetry constraints and $f$-$p$ orbital hybridization. To capture these features, we construct a minimal model incorporating $f$-electron degrees of freedom, which reproduces the observed topological properties and predicts that the surface states survive in the correlated regime, albeit shifted in energy. Our work thus introduces a new family of correlated topological materials and forecasts the robustness of their surface states under Kondo correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01511 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. a) Scanning electron micrographs of RAsS compounds. b) Selected region diffraction pattern of SmAsS collected by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Bulk and surface properties of YAsS. a) Crystal structure of YAsS in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. a) Spinless bulk bands of YAsS, with orbital weights from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bulk and surface properties of the monolayer and bilayer models. a) Bulk band dispersion of last valence and first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Bulk and surface spectrum including the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ady Stern and Netanel H. Lindner. Topological quantum computation—from basic concepts to first experiments. Science , 339(6124):1179--1184, 2013

  2. [2]

    Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in inas--al hybrid devices

    Morteza Aghaee, Alejandro Alcaraz Ramirez, Zulfi Alam, Rizwan Ali, and Mariusz Andrzejczuk. Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in inas--al hybrid devices. Nature , 638(8051):651--655, Feb 2025

  3. [3]

    Qing Yan, Hailong Li, Hua Jiang, Qing-Feng Sun, and X. C. Xie. Rules for dissipationless topotronics. Science Advances , 10(23):eado4756, 2024

  4. [4]

    Elcoro, Jennifer Cano, M

    Barry Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, Jennifer Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Zhijun Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. Andrei Bernevig. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature , 547(7663):298--305, Jul 2017

  5. [5]

    Wieder, Zhida Song, Yuanfeng Xu, Barry Bradlyn, and B

    Luis Elcoro, Benjamin J. Wieder, Zhida Song, Yuanfeng Xu, Barry Bradlyn, and B. Andrei Bernevig. Magnetic topological quantum chemistry. Nature Communications , 12(1):5965, Oct 2021

  6. [6]

    Vergniory, Benjamin J

    Maia G. Vergniory, Benjamin J. Wieder, Luis Elcoro, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Claudia Felser, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault. All topological bands of all nonmagnetic stoichiometric materials. Science , 376(6595):eabg9094, 2022

  7. [7]

    M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, Claudia Felser, Nicolas Regnault, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Zhijun Wang. A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature , 566:480--485, 2019

  8. [8]

    Wieder, M

    Yuanfeng Xu, Luis Elcoro, Zhi-Da Song, Benjamin J. Wieder, M. G. Vergniory, Nicolas Regnault, Yulin Chen, Claudia Felser, and B. Andrei Bernevig. High-throughput calculations of magnetic topological materials. Nature , 586(7831):702--707, Oct 2020

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Checkelsky, B

    Joseph G. Checkelsky, B. Andrei Bernevig, Piers Coleman, Qimiao Si, and Silke Paschen. Flat bands, strange metals and the kondo effect. Nature Reviews Materials , 9(7):509--526, Jul 2024

  2. [10]

    Quantum critical metals and loss of quasiparticles

    Haoyu Hu, Lei Chen, and Qimiao Si. Quantum critical metals and loss of quasiparticles. Nature Physics , 20(12):1863--1873, Dec 2024

  3. [11]

    Interaction-driven topological phase transitions in fermionic su(3) systems

    Mohsen Hafez-Torbati, Jun-Hui Zheng, Bernhard Irsigler, and Walter Hofstetter. Interaction-driven topological phase transitions in fermionic su(3) systems. Phys. Rev. B , 101:245159, Jun 2020

  4. [12]

    Quantum materials at the crossroads of strong correlation and topology

    Yoshinori Tokura. Quantum materials at the crossroads of strong correlation and topology. Nature Materials , 21(9):971--973, Sep 2022

  5. [13]

    Ma\ nes, Roser Valent\' , and Maia G

    Mikel Iraola, I\ nigo Robredo, Titus Neupert, Juan L. Ma\ nes, Roser Valent\' , and Maia G. Vergniory. Topology of SmB6 revisited by means of topological quantum chemistry. Phys. Rev. Res. , 6:033195, Aug 2024

  6. [14]

    M \"o bius kondo insulators

    Po-Yao Chang, Onur Erten, and Piers Coleman. M \"o bius kondo insulators. Nature Physics , 13(8):794--798, Aug 2017

  7. [15]

    Ablett, Jean-Pascal Rueff, Detlef Schmitz, Eugen Weschke, Marco Moretti Sala, Ali Al-Zein, Arata Tanaka, Maurits W

    Martin Sundermann, Fabio Strigari, Thomas Willers, Hannes Winkler, Andrey Prokofiev, James M. Ablett, Jean-Pascal Rueff, Detlef Schmitz, Eugen Weschke, Marco Moretti Sala, Ali Al-Zein, Arata Tanaka, Maurits W. Haverkort, Deepa Kasinathan, Liu Hao Tjeng, Silke Paschen, and Andr...

  8. [16]

    Scanning tunneling spectroscopy and surface quasiparticle interference in models for the strongly correlated topological insulators SmB6 and PuB6

    Pier Paolo Baruselli and Matthias Vojta. Scanning tunneling spectroscopy and surface quasiparticle interference in models for the strongly correlated topological insulators SmB6 and PuB6 . Phys. Rev. B , 90:201106, Nov 2014

  9. [17]

    Kenta Hagiwara, Yoshiyuki Ohtsubo, Masaharu Matsunami, Shin-ichiro Ideta, Kiyohisa Tanaka, Hidetoshi Miyazaki, Julien E. Rault, Patrick Le F \`e vre, Fran c ois Bertran, Amina Taleb-Ibrahimi, Ryu Yukawa, Masaki Kobayashi, Koji Horiba, Hiroshi Kumigashira, Kazuki Sumida, Taichi...

  10. [18]

    Grefe, Silke Paschen, and Qimiao Si

    Hsin-Hua Lai, Sarah E. Grefe, Silke Paschen, and Qimiao Si. Weyl–kondo semimetal in heavy-fermion systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115(1):93--97, 2018

  11. [19]

    Grefe, Hsin-Hua Lai, Silke Paschen, and Qimiao Si

    Sarah E. Grefe, Hsin-Hua Lai, Silke Paschen, and Qimiao Si. Weyl-kondo semimetals in nonsymmorphic systems. Phys. Rev. B , 101:075138, Feb 2020

  12. [20]

    Dzsaber, L

    S. Dzsaber, L. Prochaska, A. Sidorenko, G. Eguchi, R. Svagera, M. Waas, A. Prokofiev, Q. Si, and S. Paschen. Kondo insulator to semimetal transformation tuned by spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118:246601, Jun 2017

  13. [21]

    Grefe, Hsin-Hua Lai, Qimiao Si, and Silke Paschen

    Sami Dzsaber, Xinlin Yan, Mathieu Taupin, Gaku Eguchi, Andrey Prokofiev, Toni Shiroka, Peter Blaha, Oleg Rubel, Sarah E. Grefe, Hsin-Hua Lai, Qimiao Si, and Silke Paschen. Giant spontaneous hall effect in a nonmagnetic weyl–kondo semimetal. Proceedings of the National Academy ...

  14. [22]

    Schoop, Mazhar N

    Leslie M. Schoop, Mazhar N. Ali, Carola Stra er, Andreas Topp, Andrei Varykhalov, Dmitry Marchenko, Viola Duppel, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Bettina V. Lotsch, and Christian R. Ast. Dirac cone protected by non-symmorphic symmetry and three-dimensional dirac line node in zrsis. Natur...

  15. [23]

    C. Chen, X. Xu, J. Jiang, S.-C. Wu, Y. P. Qi, L. X. Yang, M. X. Wang, Y. Sun, N. B. M. Schr\"oter, H. F. Yang, L. M. Schoop, Y. Y. Lv, J. Zhou, Y. B. Chen, S. H. Yao, M. H. Lu, Y. F. Chen, C. Felser, B. H. Yan, Z. K. Liu, and Y. L. Chen. Dirac line nodes and effect of spin-orb...

  16. [24]

    Pezzini, M

    S. Pezzini, M. R. van Delft, L. M. Schoop, B. V. Lotsch, A. Carrington, M. I. Katsnelson, N. E. Hussey, and S. Wiedmann. Unconventional mass enhancement around the dirac nodal loop in zrsis. Nature Physics , 14(2):178--183, Feb 2018

  17. [25]

    Schoop, Andreas Topp, Judith Lippmann, Fabio Orlandi, Lukas Müchler, Maia G

    Leslie M. Schoop, Andreas Topp, Judith Lippmann, Fabio Orlandi, Lukas Müchler, Maia G. Vergniory, Yan Sun, Andreas W. Rost, Viola Duppel, Maxim Krivenkov, Shweta Sheoran, Pascal Manuel, Andrei Varykhalov, Binghai Yan, Reinhard K. Kremer, Christian R. Ast, and Bettina V. Lotsch...

  18. [26]

    Ceolin, N

    R. Ceolin, N. Rodier, and P. Khodadad. Le sulfoarseniure de cerium ceass et ses homologues avec les lanthanides et l'yttrium. Journal of the Less Common Metals , 53(1):137--140, 1977

  19. [27]

    Two-dimensional oxide topological insulator with iron-pnictide superconductor lifeas structure

    Qiunan Xu, Zhida Song, Simin Nie, Hongming Weng, Zhong Fang, and Xi Dai. Two-dimensional oxide topological insulator with iron-pnictide superconductor lifeas structure. Phys. Rev. B , 92:205310, Nov 2015

  20. [28]

    Layer construction of topological crystalline insulator lasbte

    YuTing Qian, ZhiYun Tan, Tan Zhang, JiaCheng Gao, ZhiJun Wang, Zhong Fang, Chen Fang, and HongMing Weng. Layer construction of topological crystalline insulator lasbte. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , 63(10):107011, May 2020

  21. [29]

    Topological crystalline insulator candidate erass with hourglass fermion and magnetic-tuned topological phase transition

    Hongxiang Chen, Jiacheng Gao, Long Chen, Gang Wang, Hang Li, Yulong Wang, Juanjuan Liu, Jinchen Wang, Daiyu Geng, Qinghua Zhang, Jieming Sheng, Feng Ye, Tian Qian, Lan Chen, Hongming Weng, Jie Ma, and Xiaolong Chen. Topological crystalline insulator candidate erass with hourgl...

  22. [30]

    U ber silicid-und germanidchalkogenide des zirkons und hafniums. Zeitschrift f \

    Hajo Onken, Karl Vierheilig, and Harry Hahn. \"U ber silicid-und germanidchalkogenide des zirkons und hafniums. Zeitschrift f \"u r anorganische und allgemeine Chemie , 333(4-6):267--279, 1964

  23. [31]

    New ternary thorium and uranium compounds myx

    F Hulliger. New ternary thorium and uranium compounds myx. Journal of the Less Common Metals , 16(2):113--117, 1968

  24. [32]

    Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e fran c aise de min \'e ralogie et de cristallographie , volume 30

    Soci \'e t \'e fran c aise de min \'e ralogie and de cristallographie. Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e fran c aise de min \'e ralogie et de cristallographie , volume 30. Masson., 1907

  25. [33]

    L. H. Strauss and C. M. Delp. Crystal structure of SmAsS . Journal of Alloys and Compounds , 353:143, 2003

  26. [34]

    Ceagas2—a new derivative of the hfcusi2 type of structure: Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic properties

    R Demchyna, JPF Jemetio, Yu Prots, Th Doert, LG Akselrud, W Schnelle, Yu Kuz'ma, and Yu Grin. Ceagas2—a new derivative of the hfcusi2 type of structure: Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic properties. Zeitschrift f \"u r anorganische und allgemeine Chemie , 630(5):635--641, 2004

  27. [35]

    Crystal chemistry and physical properties of the nonmagnetic kondo compound hfas1

    Andreas Czulucki, Gudrun Auffermann, Michal Bednarski, ukasz Bochenek, Maik B \"o hme, Tomasz Cichorek, Rainer Niewa, Niels Oeschler, Marcus Schmidt, Frank Steglich, et al. Crystal chemistry and physical properties of the nonmagnetic kondo compound hfas1. 7se0. 2. ChemPhysChem...

  28. [36]

    Liang Fu and C. L. Kane. Time reversal polarization and a z2 adiabatic spin pump. Phys. Rev. B , 74:195312, Nov 2006

  29. [37]

    Diagnosis for nonmagnetic topological semimetals in the absence of spin-orbital coupling

    Zhida Song, Tiantian Zhang, and Chen Fang. Diagnosis for nonmagnetic topological semimetals in the absence of spin-orbital coupling. Phys. Rev. X , 8:031069, Sep 2018

  30. [38]

    Quantitative mappings between symmetry and topology in solids

    Zhida Song, Tiantian Zhang, Zhong Fang, and Chen Fang. Quantitative mappings between symmetry and topology in solids. Nature Communications , 9(1):3530, Aug 2018

  31. [39]

    Joel E. Moore. The birth of topological insulators. Nature , 464(7286):194--198, Mar 2010

  32. [40]

    Topological nodal line semimetals

    Chen Fang, Hongming Weng, Xi Dai, and Zhong Fang. Topological nodal line semimetals. Chinese Physics B , 25(11):117106, nov 2016

  33. [41]

    Topological nodal line semimetals

    Xi Dai Chen Fang, Hongming Weng and Zhong Fang. Topological nodal line semimetals. Chinese Physics B , 25(11):117106, 2016

  34. [42]

    Zahid Hasan

    Shuang Jia, Su-Yang Xu, and M. Zahid Hasan. Weyl semimetals, fermi arcs and chiral anomalies. Nature Materials , 15(11):1140--1144, Nov 2016

  35. [43]

    Theoretical study of topological properties of ferromagnetic pyrite CoS2

    I Robredo, N B M Schröter, A Reyes-Serrato, A Bergara, F de Juan, L M Schoop, and M G Vergniory. Theoretical study of topological properties of ferromagnetic pyrite CoS2 . Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , 55(30):304004, may 2022

  36. [44]

    Alexandradinata, R

    Zhijun Wang, A. Alexandradinata, R. J. Cava, and B. Andrei Bernevig. Hourglass fermions. Nature , 532(7598):189--194, Apr 2016

  37. [45]

    Mathematica, V ersion 14.0, 2024

    Wolfram Research , Inc. Mathematica, V ersion 14.0, 2024. Champaign, IL, 2024

  38. [46]

    Magnetictb: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non-magnetic materials

    Zeying Zhang, Zhi-Ming Yu, Gui-Bin Liu, and Yugui Yao. Magnetictb: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non-magnetic materials. Computer Physics Communications , 270:108153, 2022

  39. [47]

    Becke and Erin R

    Axel D. Becke and Erin R. Johnson. A simple effective potential for exchange. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 124(22):221101, 2006

  40. [48]

    The Kondo problem to heavy fermions

    Alexander Cyril Hewson. The Kondo problem to heavy fermions . Cambridge university press, 1997

  41. [49]

    Vergniory, Sarah E

    Lei Chen, Chandan Setty, Haoyu Hu, Maia G. Vergniory, Sarah E. Grefe, Lukas Fischer, Xinlin Yan, Gaku Eguchi, Andrey Prokofiev, Silke Paschen, Jennifer Cano, and Qimiao Si. Topological semimetal driven by strong correlations and crystalline symmetry. Nature Physics , 18(11):13...

  42. [50]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B , 47:558--561, Jan 1993

  43. [51]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal--amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B , 49:14251--14269, May 1994

  44. [52]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Computational Materials Science , 6(1):15--50, 1996

  45. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm\"uller. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B , 54:11169--11186, Oct 1996

  46. [54]

    P. E. Bl\"ochl. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B , 50:17953--17979, Dec 1994

  47. [55]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 77:3865--3868, Oct 1996

  48. [56]

    Calculation of the magnetic anisotropy with projected-augmented-wave methodology and the case study of disordered Fe_ (1-x) Co_x alloys

    Soner Steiner, Sergii Khmelevskyi, Martijn Marsmann, and Georg Kresse. Calculation of the magnetic anisotropy with projected-augmented-wave methodology and the case study of disordered Fe_ (1-x) Co_x alloys. Phys. Rev. B , 93:224425, Jun 2016

  49. [57]

    Perez-Mato, D Orobengoa, Emre Tasci, Gemma De la Flor Martin, and A Kirov

    J. Perez-Mato, D Orobengoa, Emre Tasci, Gemma De la Flor Martin, and A Kirov. Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server. Bulgarian Chemical Communications , 43:183--197, 01 2011

  50. [58]

    Bilbao crystallographic server: I

    Mois Ilia Aroyo, Juan Manuel Perez-Mato, Cesar Capillas, Eli Kroumova, Svetoslav Ivantchev, Gotzon Madariaga, Asen Kirov, and Hans Wondratschek. Bilbao crystallographic server: I. databases and crystallographic computing programs. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline...

  51. [59]

    Aroyo, Asen Kirov, Cesar Capillas, J

    Mois I. Aroyo, Asen Kirov, Cesar Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and Hans Wondratschek. Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups . Acta Crystallographica Section A , 62(2):115--128, Mar 2006

  52. [60]

    Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme

    Klaus Koepernik and Helmut Eschrig. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B , 59:1743--1757, Jan 1999

  53. [61]

    Soluyanov

    QuanSheng Wu, ShengNan Zhang, Hai-Feng Song, Matthias Troyer, and Alexey A. Soluyanov. Wanniertools : An open-source software package for novel topological materials. Computer Physics Communications , 224:405 -- 416, 2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.