Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Performing all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins with replica exchange solute tempering

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read REST2 makes all-atom sampling of disordered proteins practical.

desk verdict A practical, correctly derived REST2 tutorial for IDP simulations, with a real—but fixable—reproducibility gap between the tested software versions and the installation instructions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01860 v1 pith:34AP4RUP submitted 2025-05-03 physics.chem-ph

Jaya Krishna Koneru , Korey M. Reid , Paul Robustelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords intrinsicallydisorderedproteinsmoleculardynamicsreplicaexchangesolutetemperingREST2enhancedsamplingsimulationconvergencealpha-synuclein
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This chapter is a worked recipe, not a new theory: it walks through setting up, running, and analyzing all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) with replica exchange solute tempering, in the REST2 variant. Its claim is that REST2 makes such simulations practical by heating only the solute through selective Hamiltonian scaling, so far fewer replicas are needed than in ordinary temperature replica exchange. The equations for the scaled Hamiltonian and the exchange acceptance criterion are stated explicitly, and the full pipeline is demonstrated on a 20-residue disordered fragment of α-synuclein. The practical payoff is a reproducible protocol whose 300 K base replica is intended to sample the unbiased Boltzmann ensemble at a fraction of the usual computational cost.

What carries the argument

The central object is the REST2 Hamiltonian, $E_n^{\text{REST2}} = \frac{\beta_n}{\beta_0} E_{pp} + \sqrt{\frac{\beta_n}{\beta_0}} E_{pw} + E_{ww}$, where the effective solute temperature is set through $\beta_n/\beta_0 = T_0/T_n$; this is what lets a replica thermostated at 300 K behave as though its solute were at 600 K. Its companion is the exchange acceptance criterion, $\Delta_{n,n+1} = (\beta_n - \beta_{n+1})\left[E_{pp}(X_{n+1}) - E_{pp}(X_n) + \frac{\sqrt{\beta_0}}{\sqrt{\beta_n} + \sqrt{\beta_{n+1}}}\left(E_{pw}(X_{n+1}) - E_{pw}(X_n)\right)\right]$, in which the water–water energy does not appear. These equations determine the scaled topology for each rung of the solute-temperature ladder and the probability that neighboring replicas swap coordinates. The convergence analysis then turns on demultiplexed replicas—trajectories that follow labeled coordinate sets as they diffuse up and down the ladder—compared through blocking error bars.

What would settle it

Take the tutorial's α-synuclein 121–140 system and compare the radius-of-gyration distribution and secondary-structure populations of the 300 K base replica against a long unbiased conventional MD run using the same force field and water model; agreement within the blocking error bars would confirm the REST2 implementation. A cheaper internal check is that exchange acceptance between adjacent rungs stays near or above 20% and that every demultiplexed replica makes round trips from the base rung to the top rung rather than lingering at 300 K.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the chapter establishes that the REST2 variant of replica exchange supports a complete, practical all-atom IDP simulation workflow. The solute–solute energy is scaled by $\beta_n/\beta_0$, the solute–solvent energy by $\sqrt{\beta_n/\beta_0}$, and water–water interactions are left unscaled, which removes the solvent–solvent energy from the exchange acceptance criterion and lets a logarithmic ladder of effective solute temperatures be spanned with far fewer replicas than temperature replica exchange requires. The paper argues that with equilibrated boxes, scaled topologies built from one unified topology, and exchange attempts every 1.6 ps, the base replica at 300 K samples the unbiased ensemble, and it shows convergence diagnostics—rung-wise averages, demultiplexed-replica round trips, and blocking error estimates—on residues 121–140 of α-synuclein.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the enhanced-sampling plugin's partial_tempering script and the MD engine's replica-exchange machinery implement the REST2 scaling and acceptance criterion exactly as written; if those external tools carry a bug, or are used with mismatched versions, the 300 K replica will not sample the unbiased Boltzmann ensemble and every tutorial result is void.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single processed topology file can be scaled mechanically into replica-specific topologies for the whole solute-temperature ladder, so preparing a REST2 run does not require rebuilding each replica from scratch.
  • Because water–water energies are absent from the exchange criterion, adjacent rungs overlap enough that a 300–450 K ladder needs roughly an order of magnitude fewer replicas than tREMD would need for the same range.
  • The 300 K trajectory from a well-mixed REST2 run is the object to compare with experimental IDP observables, provided the chosen force field and water model are known to describe disordered states.
  • High exchange acceptance rates alone do not prove convergence; the paper's demultiplexed-replica and blocking analyses are the checks that make the base-replica statistics meaningful.
  • The same setup generalizes to the REHT and REST3 variants, which modify the scaling to counteract the collapse of IDPs at high solute temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the protocol is correct, the same machinery could be applied to a disordered domain within a larger folded protein by limiting the scaled 'solute' region to the disordered segment; the effective-temperature interpretation would then need re-derivation.
  • The paper's reported high-temperature collapse of IDPs under REST2 suggests a direct three-way test: compare per-rung radius of gyration for REST2, REST3, and tREMD at matched effective temperatures; the discussion predicts the strongest compaction at the top rungs under REST2 alone.
  • The blocking-error comparison between demultiplexed replicas could be converted into an automated stopping criterion—stop production when all replicas' mean properties agree within one pooled error bar—turning the post hoc convergence judgment into a rule.
  • The requirement that every replica contain the same number of water molecules could be relaxed by rescaling box dimensions instead, but the paper's equal-box protocol is the safer default because the exchange statistics assume matched solvent degrees of freedom.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a methods/tutorial chapter that describes how to set up, perform, and analyze all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) using replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2) in GROMACS and PLUMED. The authors review the theory of REST and REST2, including the Hamiltonian scaling in Eq. (5) and the Metropolis acceptance criterion in Eq. (8), and then provide a step-by-step workflow: generating starting structures, solvating and equilibrating replicas, creating scaled topology files with PLUMED's partial_tempering script, running the replica-exchange simulation, and analyzing temperature and demultiplexed replicas. The accompanying GitHub repository provides input files, starting structures, and analysis scripts. The example simulation is a 20-residue C-terminal fragment of α-synuclein with 10 replicas spanning an effective solute temperature range of 300–450 K, and Figures 2–4 show temperature diffusion and structural analyses (radius of gyration, helical content, intramolecular contacts).

Significance. If the protocol is reproducible, this manuscript is a valuable community resource for IDP simulation, as it consolidates the REST2 theory, setup commands, and analysis strategies into a single tutorial with freely available input files and scripts. The theoretical section is accurate: Eqs. (5) and (8) correctly match the published REST2 formulation, and the workflow is internally coherent. The authors also provide practical diagnostics (round-trip times, per-replica probability of visiting the base temperature, blocking analysis) that are useful for assessing convergence. The main risk is that the exact commands and software versions as printed in the notes may not reproduce the example, which for a methods chapter is a load-bearing issue for the central claim of a working recipe.

major comments (4)
  1. [Materials / Note 1] The Materials section states that the tutorial was performed with GROMACS 2022.5 and PLUMED 2.9.0, but Note 1 instructs users to clone the current PLUMED2 repository and to build GROMACS with GMX_version=2024.3. A user following Note 1 therefore obtains a different toolchain from the one that produced Figures 2–4. Since REST2 relies on PLUMED's partial_tempering topology scaling and GROMACS's replica-exchange machinery, both of which have changed across these versions, the protocol's reproducibility is not established as written. Please align the installation instructions with the tested versions, or re-run the example with the newer toolchain and report the resulting acceptance ratios and round-trip statistics.
  2. [Note 1] The installation commands in Note 1 contain concrete errors that will prevent a following user from building the software: the branch name `v$GMX_version$` has a stray `$`; the line `echo ' export PLUMED_ROOT=$HOME/opt '` is not redirected to `.bashrc` and is missing the `export`; and the `PLUMED_KERNEL` path `/usr/share/lib/libplumedKernel.so` does not match the `$HOME/opt` prefix used earlier in the same note. These instructions should be corrected.
  3. [Note 9] The awk command used to stride replica_index.xvg contains a syntax error (`$1 ==0 $`) and the remaining logic prints the time-0 line and then a line with the time shifted by −80 ps (e.g., the 80 ps entry becomes 0 ps), producing duplicate frame times rather than a clean 80 ps spaced index. Since this command is the basis for constructing demultiplexed trajectories in the analysis workflow, it must be corrected, or the intended code from the repository should be transcribed faithfully.
  4. [Methods / Running REST2 Simulations] The manuscript does not state the total production simulation time per replica used to generate Figures 2–4. Without this information, a reader cannot reproduce the example or judge whether the reported convergence diagnostics correspond to a practically achievable run length. Please report the simulated time per replica (and the aggregate time across replicas) used for the example.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theory] There is a typographical error: "Hamlitonion" should be "Hamiltonian" in the paragraph preceding Eq. (5).
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typos, including "containg", "simulatiosn", "uncoverged", "choosen", "seperately", "disucssion", and "the the" in the Software section. These should be corrected in a final pass.
  3. [Notes 5–7] The MDP filename appears as both "minimz.mdp" and "minimiz.mdp"; please use a single consistent name in the main text and notes.
  4. [Simulation Analysis] The name "Flyvberg" should be "Flyvbjerg" when referring to the blocking analysis; this appears in the analysis section and in the bibliography entry [41].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: tutorial protocol with theory from external literature; example is illustrative; no fitted-parameter predictions.

full rationale

This paper is a methods/protocol tutorial, not a derivation of a new result. Its central claim is a how-to guide for setting up, running, and analyzing REST2 simulations of IDPs. The REST2 Hamiltonian scaling (Eq. 5) and exchange acceptance criterion (Eq. 8) are presented as established theory from Wang, Friesner, and Berne and from the PLUMED/GROMACS implementation literature; they are not derived from the tutorial's own example. No parameter is fitted to the example simulation and then renamed a prediction; the Rg, helical-content, contact, and round-trip analyses in Figures 2-4 are demonstrations of the suggested analysis workflow, not a test of the method. The authors do cite their own prior force-field and alpha-synuclein work (refs. 4 and 25), but these citations supply an input force field and a test construct for the tutorial, not the justification for REST2 itself, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The internal discrepancy between Materials (GROMACS 2022.5 and PLUMED 2.9.0) and Note 1 (GROMACS 2024.3 with current PLUMED) is a reproducibility/consistency concern, not a circularity one: following the notes may not reproduce the exact tested toolchain, but the instructions do not assume the outcome they purport to demonstrate. The derivation chain, such as it is, is self-contained in the sense that it imports its equations from external, independently published sources and validates nothing by the tutorial's own outputs. There is no self-definitional reduction, no fitted input passed off as prediction, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new model; it restates established REST2 theory and a simulation protocol. The assumptions are the correctness of the REST2 implementation in external software, the validity of the chosen force field, and the adequacy of the example simulation setup.

free parameters (1)
  • Solute temperature ladder = 300 K to 450 K, 10 rungs, geometric scaling
    Chosen by the authors for the example simulation; it is hand-set to achieve practical swap acceptance rates and does not represent a scientific fit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption REST2, as defined by Eq. 5, preserves detailed balance and samples the unbiased Boltzmann distribution at the base temperature when the acceptance criterion (Eq. 8) is used.
    The paper relies on this established property without re-deriving it; it is the foundation of the whole tutorial.
  • domain assumption The a99SB-disp force field and accompanying water model accurately model IDPs.
    The tutorial uses this force field; if it were inaccurate, the example ensemble would not be physically meaningful.
  • domain assumption The PLUMED partial_tempering script and GROMACS replica exchange implementation correctly execute the REST2 scaled Hamiltonians.
    The entire protocol assumes the software tools do what the theory requires; a bug would invalidate the tutorial.
  • ad hoc to paper The example simulation (10 replicas, 300-450 K, 6.5 nm box, 8763 water molecules) is sufficiently converged for illustration.
    The convergence analyses in Figures 2-4 support this, but no experimental validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Performing all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins with replica exchange solute tempering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/34AP4RUP

@misc{pith2026250501860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Performing all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins with replica exchange solute tempering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/34AP4RUP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01860}
}
read the original abstract

All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) computer simulations are a valuable tool for characterizing the conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). IDP conformational ensembles are highly heterogeneous and contain structures with many distinct topologies separated by large free-energy barriers. Sampling the vast conformational space of IDPs in explicit solvent all-atom MD simulations is extremely challenging, and enhanced sampling methods are generally required to obtain statistically meaningful descriptions of IDP conformational ensembles. Replica exchange solute tempering (REST) methods, where multiple coupled simulations of a system are performed in parallel with selectively modified potential energy functions, are a powerful approach for efficiently sampling the conformational space of IDPs. In this chapter, we demonstrate how to set-up, perform and analyze all-atom MD simulations of IDPs with REST enhanced sampling methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01860 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A workflow for preparing, running and analyzing REST2 simulations. a) Each box describes one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Demultiplexed replica temperature diffusion analysis. (a) Probability that each demultiplexed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Analysis of the REST2 solute temperature replicas. We compare [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Analysis of the REST2 demultiplexed replicas. We compare the mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions

    Alex S Holehouse and Birthe B Kragelund. The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 25(3):187–211, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Dissecting the biophysics and biology of in- trinsically disordered proteins

    Priya R Banerjee, Alex S Holehouse, Richard Kriwacki, Paul Robustelli, Hao Jiang, Alexander I Sobolevsky, Jennifer M Hurley, and Joshua T Mendell. Dissecting the biophysics and biology of in- trinsically disordered proteins. Trends in biochemical sciences, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Principles of protein structural ensemble determination

    Massimiliano Bonomi, Gabriella T Heller, Carlo Camilloni, and Michele Vendruscolo. Principles of protein structural ensemble determination. Current opinion in structural biology, 42:106–116, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Paul Robustelli, Stefano Piana, and David E. Shaw. Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115:E4758–E4766, 5 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Folding-upon-binding pathways of an intrinsically disordered protein from a deep markov state model

    Thomas R Sisk and Paul Robustelli. Folding-upon-binding pathways of an intrinsically disordered protein from a deep markov state model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 121(6): e2313360121, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Small molecules targeting the disordered trans- activation domain of the androgen receptor induce the formation of collapsed helical states

    Jiaqi Zhu, Xavier Salvatella, and Paul Robustelli. Small molecules targeting the disordered trans- activation domain of the androgen receptor induce the formation of collapsed helical states. Nature Communications, 13(1):6390, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Donchev, Paul Robustelli, and David E

    Stefano Piana, Alexander G. Donchev, Paul Robustelli, and David E. Shaw. Water dispersion interac- tions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states.Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 119:5113–5123, 2015. doi: 10.1021/jp508971m

    work page doi:10.1021/jp508971m 2015

  8. [8]

    Charmm36m: an improved force field for folded and intrin- sically disordered proteins

    Jing Huang, Sarah Rauscher, Grzegorz Nawrocki, Ting Ran, Michael Feig, Bert L De Groot, Helmut Grubmüller, and Alexander D MacKerell Jr. Charmm36m: an improved force field for folded and intrin- sically disordered proteins. Nature methods, 14(1):71–73, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Balanced protein–water interactions improve prop- erties of disordered proteins and non-specific protein association

    Robert B Best, Wenwei Zheng, and Jeetain Mittal. Balanced protein–water interactions improve prop- erties of disordered proteins and non-specific protein association. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 10(11):5113–5124, 2014. 25 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2014

  2. [10]

    Stefano Piana, Paul Robustelli, Dazhi Tan, Songela Chen, and David E. Shaw. Development of a force field for the simulation of single-chain proteins and protein-protein complexes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 16:2494–2507, 4 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Enhanced sam- pling methods for molecular dynamics simulations

    Jérôme Hénin, Tony Leliévre, Michael R Shirts, Omar Valsson, and Lucie Delemotte. Enhanced sam- pling methods for molecular dynamics simulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04164, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding

    Yuji Sugita and Yuko Okamoto. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chemical Physics Letters, 314:141–151, 11 1999

    1999

  5. [13]

    Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules

    Ulrich HE Hansmann. Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chemical Physics Letters, 281(1-3):140–150, 1997

    1997

  6. [14]

    Friesner, and B

    Pu Liu, Byungchan Kim, Richard A. Friesner, and B. J. Berne. Replica exchange with solute tempering: A method for sampling biological systems in explicit water. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102:13749–13754, 9 2005. ISSN 00278424

    2005

  7. [15]

    Friesner, and B

    Lingle Wang, Richard A. Friesner, and B. J. Berne. Replica exchange with solute scaling: A more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (rest2). The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 115:9431–9438, 8 2011. ISSN 1520-6106

    2011

  8. [16]

    Hamiltonian replica exchange in gromacs: a flexible implementation

    Giovanni Bussi. Hamiltonian replica exchange in gromacs: a flexible implementation. Molecular Physics, 112(3-4):379–384, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Gromacs: fast, flexible, and free.Journal of computational chemistry, 26:1701–18, 12 2005

    David Van Der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, Gerrit Groenhof, Alan E Mark, and Herman J C Berend- sen. Gromacs: fast, flexible, and free.Journal of computational chemistry, 26:1701–18, 12 2005. ISSN 0192-8651

    2005

  10. [18]

    Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers

    Mark James Abraham, Teemu Murtola, Roland Schulz, Szilárd Páll, Jeremy C Smith, Berk Hess, and Erik Lindahl. Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX, 1:19–25, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    Broglia, and Michele Parrinello

    Massimiliano Bonomi, Davide Branduardi, Giovanni Bussi, Carlo Camilloni, Davide Provasi, Paolo Raiteri, Davide Donadio, Fabrizio Marinelli, Fabio Pietrucci, Ricardo A. Broglia, and Michele Parrinello. Plumed: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynami...

    1961 doi

  12. [20]

    Tribello, Massimiliano Bonomi, Davide Branduardi, Carlo Camilloni, and Giovanni Bussi

    Gareth A. Tribello, Massimiliano Bonomi, Davide Branduardi, Carlo Camilloni, and Giovanni Bussi. Plumed 2: New feathers for an old bird. Computer Physics Communications, 185:604–613, 2 2014. ISSN 0010-4655. doi: 10.1016/J.CPC.2013.09.018

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    Flexible selection of the solute region in replica exchange with solute tempering: Application to protein-folding simulations

    Motoshi Kamiya and Yuji Sugita. Flexible selection of the solute region in replica exchange with solute tempering: Application to protein-folding simulations. The Journal of chemical physics, 149(7), 2018. BIBLIOGRAPHY 27

    2018

  14. [22]

    Replica exchange with solute tempering for protein conformational sampling

    Yichong Lao, Michael O’Connor, and Xuhui Huang. Replica exchange with solute tempering for protein conformational sampling. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    High resolution ensemble descrip- tion of metamorphic and intrinsically disordered proteins using an efficient hybrid parallel tempering scheme

    Rajeswari Appadurai, Jayashree Nagesh, and Anand Srivastava. High resolution ensemble descrip- tion of metamorphic and intrinsically disordered proteins using an efficient hybrid parallel tempering scheme. Nature Communications 2021 12:1, 12:1–11, 2 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-0...

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Re-balancing replica exchange with solute temper- ing for sampling dynamic protein conformations

    Yumeng Zhang, Xiaorong Liu, and Jianhan Chen. Re-balancing replica exchange with solute temper- ing for sampling dynamic protein conformations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 19: 1602–1614, 3 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Pan, and David E

    Paul Robustelli, Alain Ibanez-De-Opakua, Cecily Campbell-Bezat, Fabrizio Giordanetto, Stefan Becker, Markus Zweckstetter, Albert C. Pan, and David E. Shaw. Molecular basis of small-molecule binding to α-synuclein. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 144:2501–2510, 2 2022...

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling

    Giovanni Bussi, Davide Donadio, Michele Parrinello, and J Chem Phys. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys, 126:14101, 2007. doi: 10.1063/1.2408420. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.2408420

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    Replica exchange with solute tempering: efficiency in large scale systems

    Xuhui Huang, Morten Hagen, Byungchan Kim, Richard A Friesner, Ruhong Zhou, and Bruce J Berne. Replica exchange with solute tempering: efficiency in large scale systems. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 111(19):5405–5410, 2007

    2007

  20. [28]

    Replica temperatures for uniform exchange and efficient roundtrip times in explicit solvent parallel tempering simulations

    Meher K Prakash, Alessandro Barducci, and Michele Parrinello. Replica temperatures for uniform exchange and efficient roundtrip times in explicit solvent parallel tempering simulations. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 7(7):2025–2027, 2011

    2025

  21. [29]

    Heterogeneous parallelization and acceleration of molecular dynamics simulations in gromacs

    Szilárd Páll, Artem Zhmurov, Paul Bauer, Mark Abraham, Magnus Lundborg, Alan Gray, Berk Hess, and Erik Lindahl. Heterogeneous parallelization and acceleration of molecular dynamics simulations in gromacs. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 153(13), 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    VMD – Visual Molecular Dynamics

    William Humphrey, Andrew Dalke, and Klaus Schulten. VMD – Visual Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 14:33–38, 1996

    1996

  23. [31]

    The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.8

    LLC Schrödinger. The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.8. Available at: https://pymol. org/, November 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    C.Stephen Chan, and Zhenquan Hu

    Shuguang Yuan, H. C.Stephen Chan, and Zhenquan Hu. Using pymol as a platform for computa- tional drug design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science , 7:e1298, 3

  25. [33]

    Guido Van Rossum and Fred L. Drake. Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA,

  26. [34]

    Matplotlib: Visualization with python, August 2024

    The Matplotlib Development Team. Matplotlib: Visualization with python, August 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    J. D. Hunter. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3):90–95,

  28. [36]

    Harris, K

    Charles R. Harris, K. Jarrod Millman, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Cournapeau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J. Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H. van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Allan Haldane, Jaime Fe...

    2020

  29. [37]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Courna- peau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Courna- peau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson,...

    2020

  30. [38]

    McGibbon, Kyle A

    Robert T. McGibbon, Kyle A. Beauchamp, Matthew P . Harrigan, Christoph Klein, Jason M. Swails, Carlos X. Hernández, Christian R. Schwantes, Lee Ping Wang, Thomas J. Lane, and Vijay S. Pande. Mdtraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories.Biop...

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Denning, Thomas B

    Naveen Michaud-Agrawal, Elizabeth J. Denning, Thomas B. Woolf, and Oliver Beckstein. Mdanalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32: 2319–2327, 7 2011. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21787

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    Mdanalysis: A python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations

    Richard Gowers, Max Linke, Jonathan Barnoud, Tyler Reddy, Manuel Melo, Sean Seyler, Jan Do- ma´nski, David Dotson, Sébastien Buchoux, Ian Kenney, and Oliver Beckstein. Mdanalysis: A python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. In PROC. OF THE 15th P...

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Flyvbjerg and H

    H. Flyvbjerg and H. G. Petersen. Error estimates on averages of correlated data. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 91:461–466, 7 1989. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.457480. BIBLIOGRAPHY 29

    1989 doi

  34. [42]

    pyblock: A python module for performing a reblocking analysis on serially-correlated data, 2020

    James Spencer. pyblock: A python module for performing a reblocking analysis on serially-correlated data, 2020. URL http://github.com/jsspencer/pyblock

    2020

  35. [43]

    Gromacs 2022.5 source code (2022.5), 2023

    Berk Hess Paul Bauer and Erik Lindahl. Gromacs 2022.5 source code (2022.5), 2023

    2022

  36. [44]

    Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disor- dered proteins

    Jing Huang and Alexander D MacKerell. Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disor- dered proteins. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 48:40–48, 2 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.008

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    Water dispersion inter- actions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states

    Stefano Piana, Alexander G Donchev, Paul Robustelli, and David E Shaw. Water dispersion inter- actions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. The journal of physical chemistry B, 119(16):5113–5123, 2015

    2015

  38. [46]

    de Groot

    Vytautas Gapsys, Servaas Michielssens, Daniel Seeliger, and Bert L. de Groot. pmx: Automated pro- tein structure and topology generation for alchemical perturbations. Journal of Computational Chem- istry, 36:348–354, 2 2015. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23804

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform

    Marcus D Hanwell, Donald E Curtis, David C Lonie, Tim Vandermeersch, Eva Zurek, and Geoffrey R Hutchison. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. Journal of Cheminformatics, 4:17, 12 2012. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17

    2012 doi

  40. [48]

    General purpose water model can improve atomistic simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins

    Parviz Seifpanahi Shabane, Saeed Izadi, and Alexey V Onufriev. General purpose water model can improve atomistic simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins. Journal of chemical theory and com- putation, 15(4):2620–2634, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Lotthammer, Garrett M

    Jeffrey M. Lotthammer, Garrett M. Ginell, Daniel Griffith, Ryan J. Emenecker, and Alex S. Holehouse. Direct prediction of intrinsically disordered protein conformational properties from sequence. Nature Methods, 21:465–476, 3 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    The analytical flory random coil is a simple-to-use reference model for unfolded and disordered proteins

    Jhullian J Alston, Garrett M Ginell, Andrea Soranno, and Alex S Holehouse. The analytical flory random coil is a simple-to-use reference model for unfolded and disordered proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 127(21):4746–4760, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    A. D. MacKerell, D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F . T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. Reiher, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich,...

    1998

  44. [52]

    H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P . M. Postma, W. F . van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 81:3684–3690, 10

  45. [53]

    A. S. Lemak and N. K. Balabaev. On the berendsen thermostat. Molecular Simulation, 13:177–187, 9

  46. [54]

    Fluctuation formulas in molecular-dynamics simulations with the weak coupling heat bath

    Tetsuya Morishita. Fluctuation formulas in molecular-dynamics simulations with the weak coupling heat bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 113:2976–2982, 8 2000. doi: 10.1063/1.1287333

    doi

  47. [55]

    Dynamic attractor for the berendsen thermostat an the slow dynamics of biomacromolecules

    V L Golo and K V Sha ˘itan. Dynamic attractor for the berendsen thermostat an the slow dynamics of biomacromolecules. Biofizika, 47:611–7, 2002

    2002

  48. [56]

    Michael R. Shirts. Simple quantitative tests to validate sampling from thermodynamic ensembles. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 9:909–926, 2 2013. doi: 10.1021/ct300688p

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    Crystal structure and pair potentials: A molecular-dynamics study

    Michele Parrinello and Aneesur Rahman. Crystal structure and pair potentials: A molecular-dynamics study. Physical review letters, 45(14):1196, 1980

    1980

  50. [58]

    Elucidating the folding problem ofα-helices: local motifs, long-range electrostatics, ionic-strength dependence and prediction of nmr parameters

    Emmanuel Lacroix, Ana Rosa Viguera, and Luis Serrano. Elucidating the folding problem ofα-helices: local motifs, long-range electrostatics, ionic-strength dependence and prediction of nmr parameters. Journal of molecular biology, 284(1):173–191, 1998

    1998

  51. [59]

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, Alex Bridgland, Clemens Meyer, Simon A. A. Kohl, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrew Cowie, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Stani...

    2021

  52. [60]

    H. M. Berman. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28:235–242, 1 2000. doi: 10.1093/ nar/28.1.235

    2000

  53. [1984]

    30 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    doi: 10.1063/1.448118. 30 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    doi

  54. [1994]

    doi: 10.1080/08927029408021981

    doi

  55. [2007]

    doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  56. [2017]

    doi: 10.1002/WCMS.1298

    ISSN 1759-0884. doi: 10.1002/WCMS.1298. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ full/10.1002/wcms.1298https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcms.1298https: //wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcms.1298. 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.