Syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures and second-order integration of infinitesimal 2-braidings

Cameron James Deverall Kemp

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 23 references

Syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures and second-order integration of infinitesimal 2-braidings

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Second-order braided 2-category deformations work exactly for coherent infinitesimal 2-braidings, and 3-shifted Poisson structures supply syllepses.

desk verdict Genuinely new conditional theorem on second-order hexagonators, but the advertised Poisson application is deferred to future work; read the abstract with caution. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01949 v1 pith:XHMXIC6V submitted 2025-05-04 math.QA math-phmath.CTmath.MP

Cameron James Deverall Kemp This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.QAmath-phmath.CTmath.MP MSC 14A3017B3718N1053D55

keywords syllepsisbraidedmonoidal2-categoriescochaininfinitesimal2-braidingsshiftedPoissonstructuresKnizhnik-ZamolodchikovconnectiondeformationquantisationBreenpolytope

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the second-order step of a categorified Drinfeld deformation quantisation. It proves that, whenever a strict infinitesimal 2-braiding is totally symmetric and coherent, the deformation data consisting of the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov associator, the exponential braiding $\gamma e^{h/2 t}$, and explicit hexagonators of order $h^2$ satisfies every axiom of a braided pentagonal strictly-unital monoidal cochain 2-category over $K[h]/(h^3)$. The coherence condition is exactly what the Breen polytope axiom requires, so no hidden obstruction remains at this order. The paper also shows that 3-shifted Poisson structures induce infinitesimal syllepses, and that 'coboundary' 2-shifted Poisson structures induce coboundary syllepses. A sympathetic reader should take away a concrete higher-categorical deformation quantisation result whose geometric input comes from shifted Poisson geometry.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the four-term relationators $L$ and $R$, specific exchanger modifications that trivialise the commutators $[t_{12},t_{(12)3}]$ and $[t_{23},t_{1(23)}]$. From them the paper forms the infinitesimal hexagonators $h_L=2L+R$ and $h_R=L+2R$. Under total symmetry the relationators become primitive, meaning their components decompose on tensor products, which reduces the tetrahedron and hexahedron axioms to simple identities; the Breen polytope axiom reduces to the coherence equality $L+L^{231}+L^{132}=0$. The Drinfeld associator $\Phi_{KZ}(t_{12},t_{23})$ and the exponential braiding $\gamma e^{h/2 t}$ provide the deformation ansatz, and the truncated tensor product of cochain complexes makes homotopies commute with differentials so that the $h^2$ terms can be isolated cleanly.

What would settle it

Compute, on a non-trivial semi-free CDGA with a 2-shifted Poisson structure (for example a constant bracket on a shifted symmetric algebra), the component expression of $L+L^{231}+L^{132}$ for the induced infinitesimal 2-braiding. If any coefficient is nonzero, the Breen polytope axiom fails at order $h^2$ and the Poisson-geometric source of coherent braidings would be invalid, even though the abstract if-and-only-if statement for coherent $t$ would remain true.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for a symmetric strict monoidal cochain 2-category equipped with a strict totally symmetric infinitesimal 2-braiding $t$, the datum $(C_{K[h]/(h^3)},\otimes,I,\alpha=\Phi_{KZ}(t_{12},t_{23}),\sigma=\gamma e^{h/2 t},H_L=\tfrac{h^2}{24}\gamma_{1(23)}(2L+R),H_R=\tfrac{h^2}{24}\gamma_{(12)3}(L+2R))$ is a braided pentagonal strictly-unital monoidal $Ch[-1,0]_{K[h]/(h^3)}$-category if and only if $t$ is coherent. Total symmetry makes the left/right tetrahedron and hexahedron axioms hold; coherence makes the Breen polytope hold. The paper further claims that 3-shifted Poisson structures induce symmetric infinitesimal syllepses on the relevant symmetric strict monoidal cochain 2-category, and that these integrate to genuine syllepses without further obstructions, while coboundary 2-shifted Poisson structures induce coboundary syllepses.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every 2-shifted Poisson structure induces an infinitesimal 2-braiding satisfying the coherence equality; the paper sketches why using Cartan's formula and the Maurer-Cartan equation but leaves the full proof to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A totally symmetric strict coherent infinitesimal 2-braiding yields a second-order deformation quantisation of a symmetric strict monoidal cochain 2-category into a braided pentagonal strictly-unital one, with pentagonator still trivial at order $h^2$.
The Breen polytope axiom singles out coherence as the only additional condition needed at second order, so the deformation is obstructed exactly when coherency fails.
3-shifted Poisson structures are a source of syllepses in derived geometry, integrated to all orders by the simple formula $\Sigma=\gamma T$.
Coboundary 2-shifted Poisson structures give coboundary syllepses, and these remain symmetric syllepses on the second-order braided category constructed in the paper.
The third-order computations in Appendix A show the pentagonator and the right pre-hexagonator acquire nontrivial $h^3$ terms, so the construction does not terminate trivially at second order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's geometric application rests on a sketched coherence proof for 2-shifted Poisson structures; a direct computation of $L+L^{231}+L^{132}$ for a concrete semi-free CDGA would confirm or refute that the Poisson-induced braidings are coherent, independently of the abstract categorical result.
The explicit second-order hexagonators provide a consistency target for any all-orders construction via 2-holonomy of the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov 2-connection, which the author indicates is the planned route.
The parallel between 2-shifted Poisson giving braidings and 3-shifted Poisson giving syllepses suggests that $n$-shifted Poisson structures may control the $n$-th level of higher commutativity in cochain 2-categories, although the paper does not pursue this pattern beyond syllepses.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this paper proves a real conditional theorem — the second-order hexagonators built from 4-term relationators satisfy the braided monoidal cochain 2-category axioms exactly when the infinitesimal 2-braiding is totally symmetric and coherent (Propositions 5.25 and 5.29). That part is solid, detailed computation, and looks correct. But the advertised application to 2-shifted Poisson structures is not proven: it rests on a coherence claim in Remark 5.28 that the author himself kicks to a future paper (footnote 5). So the headline result is in better shape than the abstract suggests.

What's new: the paper defines infinitesimal syllepses and coboundary syllepses, shows 3-shifted Poisson structures induce them (Construction 3.6), and gives the second-order deformation quantization theorem. The proof idea makes sense: expand the KZ associator and braiding to order h^2, read off the obstructions as infinitesimal hexagonators, then check the four axioms. The tetrahedra and hexahedron reduce to primitivity of the relationators (Corollary 5.24); the Breen polytope is equivalent to coherence. The computations are careful, although the paper is heavy going — a lot of Section 2 is a reminder of [KLS25], and the diagrams in §2.2 are monstrous.

The soft spots, in proportion. The main one is Remark 5.28. Coherence (5.37)/(5.40) is necessary for the Poisson examples to satisfy the Breen polytope at order h^2. But (5.41) is only 'suggested' by Cartan's formula; no explicit degree -2 element is written and signs/coefficients are not tracked. The author states clearly this will be addressed in future work. So the application is conditional in a way the abstract overstates. It's an addressable gap, not a fatal flaw. Second, Construction 3.6 proves naturality but uses 'by analogy' for the factorisation and symmetry relations of the syllepsis; those checks should be written out. Both are referee-fixable.

Citation pattern is fine — reliance on [KLS25] is legitimate and the new results are distinct. No circularity: the central theorem is a direct check of axioms for a given ansatz.

Who is this for? Specialists in higher categories, deformation quantization, and shifted Poisson geometry. If the coherence gap is closed, this becomes a cornerstone result. As it stands, it's a strong conditional contribution.

Recommendation: send to peer review. A serious referee will want the Remark 5.28 gap addressed or at least explicitly squared with the abstract, but the paper is too substantial to desk-reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies second-order deformation quantisation of symmetric strict monoidal cochain 2-categories. For a strict infinitesimal 2-braiding t, it takes the Drinfeld KZ associator α = Φ_KZ(t12,t23) and the braiding σ = γ e^{h/2 t}, and constructs candidate hexagonators from the 4-term relationators (5.15). The main conditional theorem, Propositions 5.25 and 5.29, states that, when t is totally symmetric and strict, the resulting data (5.35) satisfies the tetrahedron, hexahedron, and Breen polytope axioms of a braided pentagonal strictly-unital monoidal Ch[-1,0]_{K[h]/(h^3)}-category, with the Breen polytope equivalent to coherence of t. The paper also introduces infinitesimal syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures and coboundary syllepses from coboundary 2-shifted Poisson structures, and computes third-order deformation data in an appendix. The abstract further claims that the infinitesimal 2-braidings induced by 2-shifted Poisson structures are totally symmetric and coherent, with coherence related to the third-weight Maurer-Cartan equation.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a concrete second-order deformation quantization ansatz that ties Cirio and Faria Martins' notions of total symmetry and coherence to the axioms of braided monoidal cochain 2-categories, and connects the Breen polytope axiom to the Maurer-Cartan equation of shifted Poisson structures. The conditional theorem is proved by direct computation and is internally credible. The construction of syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures is a natural and potentially useful extension of the authors' earlier work. The main advertised application to 2-shifted Poisson structures, however, is not yet established because the coherence check is deferred, and the total-symmetry verification is not written out; these gaps currently limit the paper to a conditional statement.

major comments (3)

[§5.2.3, Remark 5.28 and (5.41)] The coherence of the infinitesimal 2-braiding induced by a 2-shifted Poisson structure is not proven. The argument that the left-hand side of (5.41) is killed by truncation requires an explicit degree -2 morphism whose inner hom differential equals that expression, but no such morphism is written down and the signs and proportionality constants in the Cartan-formula identification are not tracked; footnote 5 explicitly defers the proof. Since Proposition 5.29 makes the Breen polytope axiom at order h^2 equivalent to coherence, the advertised application to 2-shifted Poisson structures is conditional, and the deformation data (5.35) may fail that axiom if the identification in (5.41) has a nonzero error term.
[§3.2, Construction 3.6] The claim that every 3-shifted Poisson structure induces an infinitesimal syllepsis is not proved. After constructing the homotopies T_MN, the text states that naturality and the factorisation and symmetry relations (3.6b), (3.7a), (3.7b), (3.8) can be shown by analogy with [KLS25, Proof of Theorem 3.10], but no computation or precise reference to the analogous statement is given. Since syllepsis induction from 3-shifted Poisson structures is one of the two Poisson-geometric results announced in the abstract, this verification should be supplied in full.
[Example 5.17 and §5.2.2] Total symmetry of the 2-shifted-Poisson-induced infinitesimal 2-braiding is asserted as 'clear from [KLS25, (3.28) and (3.29)]' without displaying the check. Total symmetry is a standing hypothesis in Propositions 5.25 and 5.29, so this verification should be written out explicitly rather than left to the reader.

minor comments (5)

[§2.1.2, Construction 2.20] In the display (2.23a), the codomain of rΞ + r′Θ is written as zξ′ + wθ′; the scalars z and w are undefined and should presumably be r and r′, respectively.
[Throughout] There are several typos, including 'Corollay' in the proof of Proposition 5.25 and in Corollary 5.24, and 'Defintion' in the heading of Definition 5.26. These should be corrected.
[§5.2.3, Remark 5.27] The phrase 'the relevant pseudonatural transformation which is modified to 0' is confusing; consider rewording to explain that the canonical endomodification on the zero pseudonatural transformation is forced to be zero.
[Appendix A] The switch from h in the main text to ℏ = h/(2πi) in Appendix A is stated, but a one-line reminder at the start of Section A.1 would help the reader track the rescaled coefficients.
[§2.2, displayed diagrams] Several large pasting diagrams, such as the associahedron in Definition 2.23 and the tetrahedra in Definition 2.25, are difficult to read in the arXiv rendering; consider making these diagrams separate figures or supplementing them with clarifying text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the conditional deformation theorem is a direct axiom check, and the Poisson-induction input is an independent published theorem; the coherence gap flagged in Remark 5.28 is an omitted proof, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation in Propositions 5.14, 5.25, and 5.29 is self-contained algebra: with the associator and braiding fixed as the KZ/Drinfeld ansatz, the paper expands the pre-hexagonators to order h^2, constructs the 4-term relationators L and R from the infinitesimal 2-braiding t, defines h_L = 2L + R and h_R = L + 2R, and verifies the tetrahedron and hexahedron axioms using total symmetry and primitivity. The Breen polytope check reduces the order-h^2 relation to 4(L + R + L132) = 0, which is exactly the coherency condition (5.40). This is a genuine equivalence proved by computation, not a 'prediction' that was built into the input by definition or by fitting. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is imported to force a choice; the ansatz associator and braiding are standard Drinfeld/KZ data. The citation of [KLS25] is self-citation only in the weak sense that the present author is a coauthor, but the cited construction of infinitesimal 2-braidings from 2-shifted Poisson structures is a separately published theorem with its own stated hypotheses, and it supplies the input t rather than the conclusion of the present paper. Thus it does not make the derivation circular. The genuine weakness is an omitted proof, not circularity: Remark 5.28's claim that Poisson-induced infinitesimal 2-braidings are coherent is supported only by the statement that Cartan's formula 'suggests' the required identification, by an analogy to [KLS25, (3.25a)], and by truncation; footnote 5 explicitly says 'We will address this problem head-on in a future work.' Similarly, Construction 3.6 delegates the verification for 3-shifted Poisson structures 'by analogy' to [KLS25, Proof of Theorem 3.10]. These are correctness gaps in the advertised applications, and they should be weighed in a referee report, but they are not instances of the paper reducing its own output to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is proven under stated categorical hypotheses. The transfer to 2-shifted Poisson structures relies on an additional coherence assertion that is sketched, which is the main unproven ingredient. No parameters are fitted to data; the formal parameter h is a variable, and the Drinfeld series constants are standard. The new definitions are mathematical structures within the existing framework, not independent postulates requiring empirical evidence.

assumptions (5)

standard math The ground field K has characteristic 0
Stated in Section 0.1; used for the Drinfeld associator and deformation machinery.
domain assumption The category dgCat^{[-1,0],ps}_R is a closed symmetric strict monoidal tricategory as in KLS25
All higher-categorical constructions take place in this tricategory; cited from KLS25, Appendix A.2.
ad hoc to paper The Drinfeld KZ associator Phi_KZ and the braiding ansatz sigma = gamma e^{h/2 t} are taken as the deformation data
The choice of ansatz in Construction 4.12 is a modeling choice specific to this paper's deformation scheme, though inspired by the classical KZ connection.
domain assumption The infinitesimal 2-braiding t is strict, totally symmetric and coherent
These are the hypotheses of the main theorem (Definition 5.16, Definition 5.26, and Section 4.1).
domain assumption The third-weight component of the Maurer-Cartan equation for a 2-shifted Poisson structure ensures coherence of the induced t
Invoked in Remark 5.28 to transfer the main theorem to Poisson examples; the derivation is sketched, not fully shown.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures and second-order integration of infinitesimal 2-braidings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHMXIC6V

@misc{pith2026250501949,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Syllepses from 3-shifted Poisson structures and second-order integration of infinitesimal 2-braidings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHMXIC6V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01949}
}

read the original abstract

This paper follows on from ``Infinitesimal 2-braidings from 2-shifted Poisson structures". It is demonstrated that the hexagonators appearing at second order satisfy the requisite axioms of a braided monoidal cochain 2-category provided that the strict infinitesimal 2-braiding is totally symmetric and coherent (in Cirio and Faria Martins' sense). We show that those infinitesimal 2-braidings induced by 2-shifted Poisson structures are indeed totally symmetric and we relate coherency to the third-weight component of the Maurer-Cartan equation that a 2-shifted Poisson structure must satisfy. Furthermore, we show that 3-shifted Poisson structures and ``coboundary" 2-shifted Poisson structures induce syllepses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

[1]

J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory , Gen.\ Relativ.\ Gravit.\ 43, 2335--2392 (2011) [arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2011
[2]

J. C. Baez and M. Stay, Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone , In: ``New Structures for Physics", ed. Bob Coecke, Lecture Notes in Physics 813, Springer, Berlin, 95--174 (2011) [arXiv:0903.0340 [quant-ph]]

arXiv 2011
[3]

J. C. Baez and M. Neuchl, Higher Dimensional Algebra I: Braided Monoidal 2-Categories, , Advances in Mathematics 121, no.2, 196--244 (1996) [arXiv:q-alg/9511013]

arXiv 1996
[4]

A gentle introduction to Drinfel'd associators

M. Bordemann, A. Rivezzi and T. Weigel, A Gentle Introduction to Drinfel'd Associators, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 37, no. 04, (2025) [arXiv:2304.07012v2 [math.QA]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[5]

Cartier, Construction combinatoire des invariants de Vassiliev-Kontsevich des n uds, C.\ R.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ Paris S \'e r.\ I Math.\ 316, no.\ 11, 1205--1210 (1993)

P. Cartier, Construction combinatoire des invariants de Vassiliev-Kontsevich des n uds, C.\ R.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ Paris S \'e r.\ I Math.\ 316, no.\ 11, 1205--1210 (1993)

work page 1993
[6]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Infinitesimal 2 -braidings and differential crossed modules , Adv.\ Math.\ 277, 426--491 (2015) [arXiv:1309.4070 [math.CT]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[7]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Categorifying the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection , Differential Geom.\ Appl.\ 30, no.\ 3, 238--261 (2012) [arXiv:1106.0042 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[8]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Categorifying the sl (2, ) Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection via an infinitesimal 2 -Yang-Baxter operator in the string Lie- 2 -algebra , Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 21, 147--229 (2017) [arXiv:1207.1132 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017

Show all 23 references

[9]

De Renzi, A

M. De Renzi, A. M. Gainutdinov, N. Geer, B. Patureau-Mirand and I. Runkel, 3-Dimensional TQFTs from non-semisimple modular categories, Sel. Math. New Ser. 28, no. 42, (2022) [arXiv:1912.02063 [math.GT]]

2022 arXiv
[10]

T. D. Décoppet and H. Xu, Local modules in braided monoidal 2-categories, Journal of Mathematical Physics 65, no. 6, AIP Publishing (2024) [arXiv:2307.02843 [math.CT]]

2024 arXiv
[11]

Delaney and Z

C. Delaney and Z. Wang, Symmetry defects and their application to topological quantum computing , In: ``Topological Phases of Matter and Quantum Computation", Proceedings of the 2016 AMS Special Session 747 Contemporary Mathematics, 121--153 (2020) [arXiv:1811.02143 [math.QA]]

2020 arXiv
[12]

V. G. Drinfeld, ``On quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras and on a group that is closely connected with Gal ( Q / Q ) ,'' Algebra i Analiz 2, no.\ 4, 149--181 (1990); Leningrad Math.\ J.\ 2, no.\ 4, 829--860 (1991)

1990
[13]

Fuchs, I

J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: partition functions , Nuclear Physics B 646, no.3, 353--497 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0204148]

2002 arXiv
[14]

Huang and J

Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky, Tensor categories and the mathematics of rational and logarithmic conformal field theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 46, no. 49, (2013) [arXiv:1304.7556 [hep-th]]

2013 arXiv
[15]

Johnson and D

N. Johnson and D. Yau, 2 -dimensional Categories , Oxford University Press, Oxford (2021) [arXiv:2002.06055 [math.CT]]

2021 arXiv
[16]

Kassel, Quantum Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 155, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995)

C. Kassel, Quantum Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 155, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995)

1995
[17]

G. M. Kelly, Basic concepts of enriched category theory , London Math.\ Soc.\ Lecture Note Ser.\ 64, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York (1982). [Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories 10, 1--136 (2005).]

1982
[18]

C. Kemp, R. Laugwitz and A. Schenkel, Infinitesimal 2-braidings from 2-shifted Poisson structures , Journal of Geometry and Physics, 212, (2025) [arXiv:2408.00391 [math.QA]]

2025 arXiv
[19]

Kong and Z

L. Kong and Z. H. Zhang, An invitation to topological orders and category theory , arXiv:2205.05565 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv
[20]

Laurent-Gengoux, A

C. Laurent-Gengoux, A. Pichereau and P. Vanhaecke, Poisson Structures , Springer (2013)

2013
[21]

C. J. Schommer-Pries, The Classification of Two-Dimensional Extended Topological Field Theories , arXiv:1112.1000 [math.AT]

arXiv
[22]

V. G. Turaev, Modular categories and 3-manifold invariants , Intern. J. Modern Phys. B 6, 1807--1824 (1992)

1992
[23]

V. G. Turaev and A. Virelizier, Monoidal Categories and Topological Field Theory , Progress in Mathematics 322 Birkhäuser (2017)

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory , Gen.\ Relativ.\ Gravit.\ 43, 2335--2392 (2011) [arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2011

[2] [2]

J. C. Baez and M. Stay, Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone , In: ``New Structures for Physics", ed. Bob Coecke, Lecture Notes in Physics 813, Springer, Berlin, 95--174 (2011) [arXiv:0903.0340 [quant-ph]]

arXiv 2011

[3] [3]

J. C. Baez and M. Neuchl, Higher Dimensional Algebra I: Braided Monoidal 2-Categories, , Advances in Mathematics 121, no.2, 196--244 (1996) [arXiv:q-alg/9511013]

arXiv 1996

[4] [4]

A gentle introduction to Drinfel'd associators

M. Bordemann, A. Rivezzi and T. Weigel, A Gentle Introduction to Drinfel'd Associators, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 37, no. 04, (2025) [arXiv:2304.07012v2 [math.QA]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

Cartier, Construction combinatoire des invariants de Vassiliev-Kontsevich des n uds, C.\ R.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ Paris S \'e r.\ I Math.\ 316, no.\ 11, 1205--1210 (1993)

P. Cartier, Construction combinatoire des invariants de Vassiliev-Kontsevich des n uds, C.\ R.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ Paris S \'e r.\ I Math.\ 316, no.\ 11, 1205--1210 (1993)

work page 1993

[6] [6]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Infinitesimal 2 -braidings and differential crossed modules , Adv.\ Math.\ 277, 426--491 (2015) [arXiv:1309.4070 [math.CT]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015

[7] [7]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Categorifying the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection , Differential Geom.\ Appl.\ 30, no.\ 3, 238--261 (2012) [arXiv:1106.0042 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012

[8] [8]

L. S. Cirio and J. Faria Martins, Categorifying the sl (2, ) Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection via an infinitesimal 2 -Yang-Baxter operator in the string Lie- 2 -algebra , Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 21, 147--229 (2017) [arXiv:1207.1132 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017