Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Cosmologies with a magnetic field, dust, and Lambda

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper presents an exact family of Bianchi type III cosmologies in which pressureless dust and an axis-aligned magnetic field evolve with a positive cosmological constant.

desk verdict A careful exact-solutions paper that likely fills the remaining gap in the LRS Bianchi III dust + magnetic field + Lambda family, but the new general-case integral (A2) is stated without derivation and is the one thing that must be checked before the headline claim is trustworthy. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02014 v3 pith:I624ZBLU submitted 2025-05-04 gr-qc

Martin Zofka , Kjell Rosquist This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C1583C2083F05 PACS 04.20.Jb04.40.Nr98.80.Jk
keywords BianchitypeIIIEinstein-MaxwellequationscosmologicalconstantdustmagneticfieldexactsolutionellipticintegralsdeSitterasymptotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs and analyzes an exact family of cosmological spacetimes in which pressureless dust and a magnetic field aligned with one axis evolve together with a positive cosmological constant. The family is restricted to Bianchi type III symmetry. Every admissible member either begins with a curvature singularity and expands forever toward de Sitter space, or collapses from de Sitter space into a singularity. The paper also identifies the physical meaning of each integration constant and shows that the magnetic field is dynamically negligible both near the singularity and at late times, with dust dominating the final evolution. Exact solutions of this type are scarce because the Einstein-Maxwell equations reduce to a quartic master function and an elliptic integral.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quartic master function $\Phi(\tau)=\lambda\tau^4+\tau^2+\tau-m^2$, whose zeros mark where the metric signature changes and where the physically admissible interval $\Phi>0$ ends. The metric function along the axis is built from the integral of $\tau^2/\Phi(\tau)^{3/2}$, and the Appendix A evaluation of that integral over the only factorization compatible with the spacetime signature, $\Phi=\lambda(\tau+A)(\tau-B)(\tau^2+C\tau+D)$, converts the formal solution into an explicit one. The additive constant $\beta$ of the integral determines both the asymptotic value of the metric function and the location $\tau_0$ where the dust density diverges, so it controls whether the model expands from or collapses into a singularity.

What would settle it

Differentiate the right-hand side of (A2) term by term and compare it with $\tau^2/\Phi(\tau)^{3/2}$ for representative parameter pairs such as $\lambda=1,m=1$; if the derivative disagrees at any point in the interval where $\Phi>0$, the Appendix A formula is wrong and the claimed exact solution fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim to have found a new exact non-vacuum solution of Bianchi type III with pressureless dust and a magnetic field aligned with the symmetry axis, involving all possible constants of integration. In normalized coordinates the metric is given by equation (14), driven by a quartic master function $\Phi(\tau)=\lambda\tau^4+\tau^2+\tau-m^2$, with the Maxwell field $F=\alpha m\,\sinh y\,dy\wedge dz$ and dust density given by equation (17). The integral appearing in the metric is evaluated in closed form in Appendix A in terms of elliptic integrals of the first and second kind. Every admissible branch of the spacetime either expands from a curvature singularity toward the asymptotic de Sitter form (38) or collapses from that asymptotic region into a singularity. The paper also states that the magnetic field is negligible compared with dust near the singularity and asymptotically, because the Maxwell invariant falls like $\tau^{-4}$ while the dust density falls like $\tau^{-3}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the closed-form expression in Appendix A really equals the quartic integral for every admissible $\lambda$ and $m$, since it is stated without derivation and no independent check is provided.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every allowed branch of the solution family begins or ends at a curvature singularity where the dust density diverges; there is no nonsingular expanding cosmology in this class.
  • At late times, universes with $\Lambda>0$ approach the de Sitter asymptotic form, so the cosmological constant eventually dominates both matter and magnetic field.
  • Near the singularity, the magnetic field energy density remains finite where the dust density diverges, so the magnetic field does not drive the singularity.
  • The parameters $\lambda$ and $m$ combine into a single quartic master function, so the whole family's dynamics is controlled by two dimensionless ratios rather than by three independent constants.
  • The dust density falls as $\tau^{-3}$ and the Maxwell invariant as $\tau^{-4}$ at late times, which fixes how the magnetic-to-dust energy ratio decays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not developed in the paper: because the magnetic field is sourced by the boundary rather than by the dust, one could reinterpret the dust as two streams of opposite charge, making the field self-generated; the algebra would be a direct extension of equations (14)-(17).
  • Not developed in the paper: the explicit integral (A2) could seed numerical integrations of non-diagonal or three-scale-factor Bianchi type III models to see whether the qualitative behavior survives beyond the two-scale-factor ansatz.
  • Not developed in the paper: the paper plots the dust-to-magnetic ratio for $\Lambda=0$ but not for the general case; reading off that ratio from the general solution would show whether the temporary magnetic-domination eras seen for $\beta>0$ persist.
  • If the Appendix A formula is independently verified, it would supply exact initial data for numerical studies of backreaction in magnetized anisotropic cosmologies, which the paper does not discuss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a family of exact solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations with pressureless dust, a homogeneous magnetic field, and a positive cosmological constant, restricted to a diagonal, locally rotationally symmetric two-scale-factor Bianchi type III line element (1). The field equations are reduced to a quartic master function Φ(τ) and two quadratures, leading to the metric (14) and densities (17). The subcases with Λ=0 and/or M=0 and/or α=0 are integrated explicitly and their physical meaning is discussed (§III A–D). The general case with λ,m≠0 is expressed via the elliptic-integral closed form (A2)–(A7) in Appendix A. The paper then argues that every admissible solution either expands forever from a curvature singularity toward the vacuum de Sitter asymptotic form (38) or collapses to a singularity, and that the dust energy density dominates the magnetic field both near the singularity and at late times.

Significance. The subcase solutions are explicitly integrated and correct by direct differentiation, and the interpretation of the constants is careful and useful. The paper is also transparent about provenance, crediting the integral relation (4) to Lorenz [30] and Stewart–Ellis [15], and it documents and numerically checks an erratum in the published tables it uses (footnote [33]). If the general antiderivative (A2)–(A7) is correct, the paper would provide a genuinely new exact non-vacuum Bianchi type III solution with all integration constants, with potential value for studies of magnetized anisotropic cosmology. However, that 'if' is the central issue: because (A2) is stated without derivation, a computer-algebra check, or numerical comparison to (A1), the exact-solution claim and the entire §IV analysis currently rest on an unverified algebraic identity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A2)–(A7); §IV B–C] The antiderivative (A2) is the single unverified link in the paper. It is stated with no derivation, no computer-algebra check, and no numerical comparison against the defining integral (A1), even though every downstream statement in §IV — the existence of τ0, the sign and divergence structure of the integral, the singularity at its zero, the de Sitter asymptotics, Figures 5–6, and the novelty claim in §IV C — presupposes that (A2) differentiates to ζ²/Φ(ζ)^{3/2} with the stated branch structure. I ask the authors to supply a derivation of (A2) (for example, by symbolic differentiation and reduction to (A1)) or an independent verification over a grid of admissible (λ,m) covering the physical interval. The final paragraph of Appendix A additionally asserts that the imaginary part is constant outside the two real roots and the real part constant between them, and that an appropriate β cancels the imaginary part on the whole physical domain; this requires proof and an explicit branch convention for the elliptic integrals F and E. Without these, the reality and signature of the metric (14), and hence the singularity analysis of §IV, are not established.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (1); §IV C] Equation (1) is introduced as 'the general metric of Bianchi type III', but it is a diagonal, locally rotationally symmetric two-scale-factor ansatz. The subsequent novelty statements — 'an explicit solution of the general case has never been presented' (§IV C) and the concluding claim that (A2) is a solution 'involving all possible constants of integration' (§V) — are correspondingly broader than what is actually solved unless the authors show that every relevant Bianchi type III metric can be transformed to (1). Please either prove that reduction or rephrase these claims as applying to the diagonal two-scale-factor subclass. This does not invalidate the subcase solutions, but it matters for the scope of the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV C] The exclusion of four real simple roots is asserted without proof; a one-line argument (four real roots with zero sum force the coefficient of τ² to be negative when λ>0) would make the bullet self-contained.
  2. [Appendix A] The notation overloads A and B: the roots of the factorized master function are named A and B in (A1)–(A2), while the coefficients in (A2) are also defined as A and B in (A6)–(A7). Please rename one set (for instance, call the roots A₁ and B₁ or the coefficients 𝒜 and ℬ) so that (A2) is unambiguous.
  3. [Section II, after Eq. (4)] The sentence 'we can remove it by shifting the time t' refers to the additive constant determined by K, but K also controls the allowed range of the integral; please clarify that the shift does not change the domain restrictions.
  4. [Section IV B] The argument near Eqs. (39)–(40) defines β as the asymptotic value of the integral, but the text does not explain how a chosen β is realized by a concrete choice of the lower limit ℓ in (14); a sentence connecting β and ℓ would help readers reproduce Figures 5–6.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exact solutions and their qualitative behavior are derived by explicit integration of the Einstein-Maxwell equations, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Starting from the diagonal Bianchi type III metric ansatz (1) and the source-free Maxwell field (2), the authors solve the Einstein equations (3) and reduce the problem to the integral relation (4), which they explicitly attribute to independent prior work: 'The relation (4) is given as equation (22) in [30], which was preceded by equation (4.12) in [15].' No parameter is fitted to data, and no output quantity is used to define an input quantity. The metric (14), the Maxwell field (16), and the dust and magnetic energy densities (17) are stated as solutions of the field equations for arbitrary admissible values of λ, m, and β, and the subsequent physical claims—dust dominance near the singularity, the de Sitter asymptotic form (38), the existence of the singular time τ0, and the positivity of the dust density—are analytic consequences of the inequalities and asymptotic estimates in Section IV, not assumptions imported to force those conclusions. The explicit general-case integral (A2)–(A7) is presented as the evaluation of the defining integral (A1); it is not derived in detail and is not machine-checked, but an unverified algebraic computation is a correctness risk, not circularity, because the formula is not defined in terms of the conclusions it supports. The paper also openly credits prior results: Section III.D states 'This solution is equivalent to (31a-b) of [30]', and the footnote [33] describes a numerical check of the elliptic-integral formula from Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. There are no load-bearing self-citations and no renamed fits masquerading as predictions. The appropriate finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The solution family is parametrized by the integration constants alpha, M, and beta plus Lambda; none of these is fitted to data, since the paper constructs exact solutions rather than confronting observations. The free-parameter list therefore records the constants that label the family, not fitted numbers. The load-bearing assumptions are the field equations, the metric ansatz, the aligned sourceless Maxwell field, and Lambda >= 0; the elliptic integral machinery is standard mathematics. No new particles, forces, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (dimensionless combination lambda = Lambda alpha^2 / 3)
    Integration constant of the field equations that sets the global conformal scale; the combination lambda labels the solution family. Plots use illustrative values (lambda = 1, m = 1) rather than fits to observations.
  • M (magnetic field strength, dimensionless m = M / alpha)
    Integration constant fixing the Maxwell field (16) and its energy density; not fitted to any observational bound.
  • beta (asymptotic value of the integral in (14))
    Additive integration constant, equivalently the lower limit L in (8); its sign selects the expanding versus collapsing branch and sets the singularity time tau0.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-Maxwell equations (3) with a cosmological constant are the governing field equations
    The framework of the paper; eq. (3) is adopted as the physical starting point, as is standard in classical general relativity.
  • domain assumption The metric ansatz (1): a diagonal, two-scale-factor Bianchi type III metric, described as the general Bianchi III metric
    Section II, eq. (1); this excludes non-diagonal and three-scale-factor configurations of the class, so the 'general solution' claim is scoped by the ansatz.
  • domain assumption A pressureless dust at rest in the comoving coordinates plus a sourceless, x-aligned magnetic field (2)
    Section II, eqs. (2)-(3); the Maxwell field is fixed by the sourceless equations, and the authors state in Section V that its source lies in the asymptotic region.
  • domain assumption Lambda >= 0 (positive cosmological constant), used in the factorization (33)-(34)
    Section I chooses positive Lambda for consistency with observations; Section III D requires Lambda > 0 for real a^2, b^2.
  • standard math Elliptic-integral formulas from Gradshteyn-Ryzhik, 7th edition (3.156.4, 3.163.4)
    Used in Section III D, eq. (37); the authors flag and correct an error in the 8th edition after numerical checks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmologies with a magnetic field, dust, and Lambda." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I624ZBLU

@misc{pith2026250502014,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmologies with a magnetic field, dust, and Lambda},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I624ZBLU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02014}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with the cosmological constant where the source of the gravitational field consists of a magnetic field and dust. In particular, we restrict our study to the case of Bianchi type III models. All these solutions either start with a singularity and then expand, or they are initially collapsing and end at a singularity. We discuss the physical meaning of the parameters appearing in the metrics and examine the possible subcases and the relative importance of the dust and the magnetic field as we approach the singularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02014 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The density of the dust with Λ = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The energy density of the dust, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The moment of singularity—diverging dust density ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Ratio of the energy density of the magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: In these plots we set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: In these plots corresponding to the general case, we use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Exact Bianchi-Kantowski-Sachs solutions of Einstein’s field equations,

    D. Lorenz, “Exact Bianchi-Kantowski-Sachs solutions of Einstein’s field equations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , vol. 16, no. 3, p. 575, 02 1983. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/16/3/016

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/16/3/016 1983

  2. [15]

    Solutions of Einstein’s Equations for a Fluid Which Exhibit Local Rotational Symmetry,

    J. M. Stewart and G. F. R. Ellis, “Solutions of Einstein’s Equations for a Fluid Which Exhibit Local Rotational Symmetry,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1072–1082, 07

    work page

  3. [33]

    We confirmed the result from the 7th edition [32] by integrating numerically

    There is an error in (3.156.4) in the 8th edition [34]: it defines χ := arcsin η b q a2+b2 a2+η2 , which has the wrong asymptotics for η → ∞. We confirmed the result from the 7th edition [32] by integrating numerically

    work page

  4. [1]

    Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evolution and observation,

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov, “Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evolution and observation,” The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , vol. 21, no. 1, p. 62, Jun 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7

    doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 2013

  5. [2]

    Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from their impact on the ionization history with Planck 2018,

    D. Paoletti, J. Chluba, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubi˜ no-Mart´ ın, “Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from their impact on the ionization history with Planck 2018,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , vol. 517, no. 3, pp. 3916–3927, 10 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2947

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2947 2018

  6. [3]

    Constraint on intergalactic magnetic field from fermi/lat observations of the

    I. Vovk, A. Korochkin, A. Neronov, and D. Semikoz, “Constraint on intergalactic magnetic field from fermi/lat observations of the ”pair echo” of grb 221009a,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.07672

    arXiv 2023

  7. [4]

    A lower bound on intergalactic magnetic fields from time variability of 1es 0229+200 from magic and fermi/lat observations,

    V. A. Acciari et al., “A lower bound on intergalactic magnetic fields from time variability of 1es 0229+200 from magic and fermi/lat observations,” Astronomy & Astrophysics , vol. 670, p. A145,

    work page

  8. [5]

    Planck 2015 results - xix. constraints on primordial magnetic fields,

    Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2015 results - xix. constraints on primordial magnetic fields,” Astronomy & Astrophysics , vol. 594, p. A19, 2016. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525821

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525821 2015

Show all 36 references
  1. [6]

    Constraining supermassive primordial black holes with magnetically induced gravitational waves,

    T. Papanikolaou and K. N. Gourgouliatos, “Constraining supermassive primordial black holes with magnetically induced gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 108, p. 063532, Sep 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063532

    2023 doi

  2. [7]

    Some Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Relativistic Cosmological Models,

    R. Kantowski and R. K. Sachs, “Some Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Relativistic Cosmological Models,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 443–446, 03 1966. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704952

    1966 doi

  3. [8]

    Dynamics of Pressure-Free Matter in General Relativity,

    G. F. R. Ellis, “Dynamics of Pressure-Free Matter in General Relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1171–1194, 05 1967. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1705331

    1967 doi

  4. [9]

    A dust-filled Kantowski-Sachs universe with Λ > 0,

    Ø. Grøn and E. Eriksen, “A dust-filled Kantowski-Sachs universe with Λ > 0,” Physics Letters A , vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 217–220, 1987. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0375960187900065

    1987

  5. [10]

    Kantowski–Sachs universes with counter-rotating dust,

    J. R. Gair, “Kantowski–Sachs universes with counter-rotating dust,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 24, p. 6345, 11 2002. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/19/24/305

    2002

  6. [11]

    Some relativistic cosmological models,

    R. Kantowski, “Some relativistic cosmological models,” PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1966

    1966

  7. [12]

    Solution of the Gravitation Equations for a Homogeneous Anisotropic Model,

    A. S. Kompaneyets and A. Chernov, “Solution of the Gravitation Equations for a Homogeneous Anisotropic Model,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1939–1944, November 1964. [Online]. Available: http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/r/47/5/p1939?a=list

    1939

  8. [13]

    Global structure of the

    C. B. Collins, “Global structure of the ”Kantowski–Sachs” cosmological models,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2116–2124, 11 1977. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523191

    1977 doi

  9. [14]

    Kantowski–Sachs cosmological models approaching isotropy,

    E. Weber, “Kantowski–Sachs cosmological models approaching isotropy,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3279–3285, 11 1984. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 526076

    1984 doi

  10. [16]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsk´ y,Exact Space-Times in Einstein ’s General Relativity , ser. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  11. [17]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of Einstein ’s Field Equations , 2nd ed., ser. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2003

    2003

  12. [18]

    Two-fluid Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmologies and their numerical predictions

    A. A. Coley and B. O. J. Tupper, “Two-fluid Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmologies and their numerical predictions.” Canadian Journal of Physics , vol. 64, pp. 204–209, Feb. 1986, provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System. [Online]. Available: 17 https://ui.adsabs.harv...

    1986

  13. [19]

    Multi-fluid cosmology in Einstein gravity: analytical solutions,

    V. Faraoni, S. Jose, and S. Dussault, “Multi-fluid cosmology in Einstein gravity: analytical solutions,” General Relativity and Gravitation , vol. 53, no. 12, p. 109, Dec 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02879-z

    2021 doi

  14. [20]

    Primordial Element Formation, Primordial Magnetic Fields, and the Isotropy of the Universe,

    K. S. Thorne, “Primordial Element Formation, Primordial Magnetic Fields, and the Isotropy of the Universe,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 148, p. 51, 04 1967. [Online]. Available: https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1967ApJ...148...51T/0000051.000.html

    1967

  15. [21]

    Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Cosmological Models Containing Relativistic Fluid and Magnetic Field,

    J. P. Vajk and P. G. Eltgroth, “Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Cosmological Models Containing Relativistic Fluid and Magnetic Field,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2212–2222, 07 1970. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665382

    1970 doi

  16. [22]

    Model of a universe with a uniform magnetic field,

    A. G. Doroshkevich, “Model of a universe with a uniform magnetic field,” Astrophysics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 138–142, Jul 1965. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01041937

    1965 doi

  17. [23]

    A homogeneous anisotropic cosmological model with a magnetic field,

    I. S. Shikin, “A homogeneous anisotropic cosmological model with a magnetic field,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR , vol. 171, pp. 73–76, 1966. [Online]. Available: http://mi.mathnet.ru/dan32670

    1966

  18. [24]

    Influence of electromagnetic fields on the evolution of initially homogeneous and isotropic universe,

    G. A. Alekseev, “Influence of electromagnetic fields on the evolution of initially homogeneous and isotropic universe,” Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics , vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 129–139, Jul 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543813040111

    2013 doi

  19. [25]

    Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models: New Exact Solutions with Dust, Isotropic Radiation, and Electromagnetic Field,

    N. Tomimura and I. Waga, “Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models: New Exact Solutions with Dust, Isotropic Radiation, and Electromagnetic Field,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 317, p. 52, 1987. [Online]. Available: https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1987ApJ...317...52T

    1987

  20. [26]

    An anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic universe in general relativity,

    T. Singh and R. B. S. Yadav, “An anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic universe in general relativity,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics , vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 917–930, 1980. [Online]. Available: http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig q=RN:13646526

    1980

  21. [27]

    Bianchi cosmologies, magnetic fields, and singularities,

    R. Casadio, A. Kamenshchik, P. Petriakova, and P. Mavrogiannis, “Bianchi cosmologies, magnetic fields, and singularities,” Physical Review D , vol. 108, no. 8, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084059

    2023 doi

  22. [28]

    Spatially homogeneous cosmological models of Bianchi type III,

    S. Ram, “Spatially homogeneous cosmological models of Bianchi type III,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 757–759, 03 1989. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528393

    1989 doi

  23. [29]

    Magnetogenesis from anisotropic universe,

    S. Pal, D. Maity, and T. Q. Do, “Magnetogenesis from anisotropic universe,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07685

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    On the general solution for a ‘diagonal’ vacuum Bianchi type III model with a cosmological constant,

    M. A. H. MacCallum, A. Moussiaux, P. Tombal, and J. Demaret, “On the general solution for a ‘diagonal’ vacuum Bianchi type III model with a cosmological constant,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , vol. 15, no. 5, p. 1757, 05 1982. [Online]. Available: https://d...

    1982 doi

  25. [32]

    I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Y. V. Geronimus, and M. Y. Tseytlin, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed. Academic Press, 2007, eds. A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger

    2007

  26. [34]

    I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Y. V. Geronimus, and M. Y. Tseytlin, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed. Academic Press, 2015, eds. D. Zwillinger and V. H. Moll

    2015

  27. [1968]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664679

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664679

    doi

  28. [2023]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244126

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244126

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.