Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Evolution of protein$-$RNA interactions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The earliest protein–RNA interactions relied on non-canonical basic residues or magnesium bridges before modern arginine-lysine motifs took over.

desk verdict A well-hedged, honest review of peptide–RNA co-evolution that is worth refereeing, but its Mg2+-bridged acidic-peptide model leans on an unsupported claim about prebiotic Asp/Glu abundance. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02037 v1 pith:53VVOK5O submitted 2025-05-04 physics.bio-ph

Michal H. Kolář , Klára Hlouchová This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords protein-RNAinteractionsoriginoflifeprebioticpeptidesribosomeevolutioncoacervationmagnesiumbridgingnon-canonicalaminoacidsRNAworld
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the earliest protein–RNA interactions did not require the modern RNA-binding toolkit of arginine, lysine, and aromatic residues. Drawing on the ribosome as a molecular fossil, it builds the case that short, unstructured, prebiotically plausible peptides first engaged RNA through simple electrostatic contacts, either carrying non-canonical basic residues such as diaminopropionic acid, diaminobutyric acid, and ornithine, or using magnesium ions to bridge acidic peptide side chains to the RNA backbone. The review matters because it recasts the origin of the ribosome and of compartmentalization: RNA binding, charge neutralization, and coacervation could precede both the full genetic code and Darwinian selection. Its synthesis unifies observations from prebiotic chemistry, in vitro evolution, and ribosomal structure into a single trajectory from weak, low-specificity assemblies to today's conserved machines.

What carries the argument

Two mechanistic proposals carry the argument. The first is substitution of canonical basic residues by non-canonical prebiotic alternatives—Dpr, Dab, and Orn—whose side chains present amino groups at different distances from the backbone and can support RNA binding and peptide–RNA coacervation, though with lower chain stability and efficiency than lysine/arginine. The second is metal-bridged ion pairing, in which Mg$^{2+}$ (or K$^{+}$) coordinates between RNA phosphates and carboxylates of acidic residues (Asp, Glu), preserving binding without any basic side chain; this mirrors the Mg$^{2+}$-rich, protein-poor environment of the ribosome's oldest core. Around these models, coacervation—liquid–liquid phase separation driven by electrostatic polyion interactions and counterion release—supplies the spatial mechanism by which weak early interactions could concentrate RNA, protect it from hydrolysis, and create protocellular compartments.

What would settle it

Measure the yields of arginine and lysine in spark-discharge and wet–dry cycling experiments on early-Earth gas mixtures; if either amino acid accumulates at abundances comparable to the consensus early amino acids and survives cycling, the premise that early peptides lacked canonical basic residues collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that contemporary protein–RNA recognition, dominated by Arg/Lys and aromatic motifs, was preceded by a distinct physicochemical regime. In that regime, positive charge for binding RNA could come from non-canonical basic residues (Dpr, Dab, Orn) or, when those were unavailable or unstable, from metal ions—chiefly Mg$^{2+}$—bridging acidic residues to the RNA phosphate backbone. The review treats these as two nonexclusive pathways and reads the ribosome as their archive: the oldest layers of the large ribosomal subunit are rich in Mg$^{2+}$ and contain the most ancient, unstructured fragments of ribosomal proteins, while basic-residue-rich proteins appear later in evolution. It concludes that the earliest protein–RNA complexes were likely low-specificity, electrostatically driven assemblies that acquired structure, specificity, and the canonical basic/aromatic repertoire through later biophysical optimization and selection.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the set of ten amino acids thought to be available on the early Earth—which excludes arginine and lysine—really was the available set; if arginine and lysine were actually abundant, the case for non-canonical basic residues and magnesium bridges loses its motivation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the early interactions were metal-bridged and electrostatically simple, then a genetic code and templated protein synthesis were not prerequisites for the first functional protein–RNA partnerships.
  • The oldest regions of the ribosome become interpretable as a preserved record: Mg$^{2+}$ neutralizes the rRNA backbone there, and the most ancient r-protein fragments lack secondary structure, suggesting proteins gradually took over charge compensation from magnesium.
  • Prebiotically plausible peptides containing Orn or Dab can support RNA binding and even substitute for high Mg$^{2+}$ in ribozyme catalysis, implying that the later dominance of Arg and Lys was an optimization, not a founding requirement.
  • The ability of short heteropeptides to form RNA-containing coacervates with fluid, non-gelling properties provides a plausible route to prebiotic compartmentalization before membranes or complex protein machinery.
  • Because polycationic peptides can inhibit ribozymes by displacing Mg$^{2+}$, the ancestral role of acidic peptides as Mg$^{2+}$ buffers may have been as important for RNA stability as direct RNA binding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review leaves implicit that ancestral RNA-binding proteins may be missed by searches that screen exclusively for basic/aromatic motifs; looking for clustered acidic residues near structurally conserved Mg$^{2+}$ sites could uncover deeper evolutionary relationships.
  • The Mg$^{2+}$-buffering role of acidic peptides suggests a testable extension: measure whether all-acidic peptides extend the lifetime of structured RNAs at high Mg$^{2+}$ concentrations, which would directly connect the proposed ancestral mechanism to the RNA-stability problem.
  • The distinction between polycationic and heteropeptide coacervation implies that the prebiotic compartmentalization phenotype depended on charge density; a systematic comparison of Orn-substituted versus Lys-substituted peptide libraries could map when coacervation becomes protective versus degradative.
  • If non-canonical basic residues were transient because of cyclization and chain termination, the model predicts that the earliest RNA-binding peptides occupied a narrow compositional window—stable enough to oligomerize and bind RNA but not so cationic that they promoted hydrolysis—and that window could be mapped experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews current understanding of how protein-RNA interactions emerged under prebiotic conditions and evolved into modern complexes such as the ribosome. The authors argue that the earliest interactions likely involved short, unstructured, compositionally biased peptides and RNA, and they develop two non-exclusive scenarios: (i) use of non-canonical basic residues such as Dpr, Dab, and Orn, and (ii) metal-ion-bridged contacts, particularly Mg2+ bridging acidic peptides and RNA. The review connects these scenarios to the accretion history of the ribosome, to peptide-RNA coacervation and compartmentalization, and to the eventual dominance of canonical Arg/Lys-based interactions. It explicitly discusses contradictory evidence from Blanco et al. and concludes with hedged statements that the earliest interactions 'may have involved' these non-canonical modes.

Significance. The review provides a useful synthesis of a scattered literature and offers a clear, falsifiable framework: if correct, the earliest protein-RNA interactions were chemically simpler and less sequence-specific than modern ones, relying on electrostatics and metal bridging. The authors creditably engage with opposing views (refs 37-38) and hedge their conclusions. They also bring together recent experimental work, including their own (refs 28,43), and highlight a functional rationale for the eventual takeover by Arg/Lys. The main value is organizational: the two-scenario structure gives the field concrete hypotheses to test. However, the review's impact depends on the plausibility of the acidic-rich prebiotic peptide composition, which is not currently supported by the cited literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Early ionic interactions] The assertion that 'the early peptides were likely highly acidic overall due to high prebiotic abundance of the canonical acidic amino acids (Asp and Glu)' is not supported by the references cited (34-36), which only establish that Asp and Glu belong to the consensus 'early' amino acid alphabet. Prebiotic synthesis and meteorite analyses typically show glycine and alanine as the most abundant amino acids, with acidic residues as minor components. Because this premise motivates the entire Mg2+-bridged acidic-peptide model, the paragraph needs either a supporting citation for the abundance claim or an explicit reframing of the model as conditional on an acidic-rich composition.
  2. [Conclusions] The central conclusion ('Recent experimental evidence suggests that such interactions may have involved non-canonical basic residues or been mediated by metal ions—particularly Mg2+—bridging acidic peptides and RNA') overstates the support for the acidic-peptide branch, since the only cited experimental demonstration of this mode (ref 43) is a single in vitro evolution study and the prebiotic abundance of acidic residues is not established. Please add a qualifier such as 'if prebiotic peptides were enriched in acidic residues' or discuss the uncertainty in early peptide composition before this sentence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 2] The quantitative distributions of Mg2+ ions and Lys/Arg side-chain distances shown in Figure 2C,D are not accompanied by any methodological description; please add a brief account of the PDB structure used, the distance metric, the shell width, and the normalization of the number concentrations so that readers can evaluate the analysis.
  2. [Heading] The section heading 'History or protein-RNA interactions' contains a typo and should read 'History of protein-RNA interactions'.
  3. [References] In the reference list, ref 26 contains 'qunstructured' (should be 'unstructured'); also, in the 'Early ionic interactions' section the text 'reviewede.g. in' should be 'reviewed e.g. in'.
  4. [Early ionic interactions] In the amino acid enumeration, '( 34' is missing its closing parenthesis; it should read '(34)'.
  5. [Figure 3] The caption of Figure 3 contains the typo 'depsipepdide'; it should be 'depsipeptide'.
  6. [References] Ref 48 is a ChemRxiv preprint; if the manuscript has since been published, please update the citation or note its preprint status.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the review synthesizes independent experimental results and does not derive predictions from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This is a narrative review rather than a derivation, so the circularity patterns based on fitted parameters, definitional identification, or equations do not apply. The paper's central claims—that early protein-RNA interactions may have used non-canonical basic residues or Mg2+-bridged acidic peptides—are presented as syntheses of cited experimental work, not as predictions derived from the authors' own prior results. The author-group studies cited (refs 28 and 43) are experimental observations with independent content, and the same conclusions are supported by non-overlapping groups (refs 6-8, 48, 52), so these self-citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The statement that early peptides were 'likely highly acidic overall due to high prebiotic abundance of the canonical acidic amino acids' is asserted without a citation, but an unsupported premise is an evidentiary or correctness concern, not a circularity concern under the stated criteria. No equation, fit, or uniqueness theorem is invoked such that an output reduces to its input by construction. The review is self-contained as a synthesis and does not disguise its inputs as predictions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced, because the paper is a review. The load-bearing assumptions are domain assumptions inherited from the cited literature: prebiotic amino acid availability, the ribosome accretion chronology, the relevance of in vitro coacervation, and the availability of non-canonical basic amino acids. These are contextual rather than constructs introduced by this paper.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The consensus prebiotic 'early' amino acid alphabet, comprising Gly, Ala, Asp, Val, Glu, Ile, Leu, Pro, Ser, and Thr, reflects actual prebiotic availability, with basic residues Arg and Lys scarce.
    This premise motivates the entire review's focus on alternative binding modes; it is introduced in the 'Early ionic interactions' section and rests on refs 34-36, and the review itself notes that its plausibility is questioned by refs 37-38.
  • domain assumption The ribosome accretion model correctly identifies the oldest regions of the ribosome, so inferences about ancient peptide-RNA interactions from those regions are valid.
    The section 'History or protein-RNA interactions inferred from the ribosome' relies on the chronological framework of refs 21-24 and 26-27 to argue that the most ancient fragments are unstructured and that Mg2+ neutralized early rRNA charge.
  • domain assumption Peptide-RNA coacervation observed in vitro is a valid proxy for prebiotic compartmentalization and protocell organization.
    The coacervation section treats spontaneous droplet formation from refs 6, 28, 48, and 52 as evidence for early cellular organization, without analyzing whether prebiotic concentrations and conditions match those used in the experiments.
  • domain assumption Non-canonical basic amino acids Dpr, Dab, and Orn were available prebiotically and could participate in early peptide-RNA interactions.
    The first alternative model of basic-residue-free binding depends on this availability; the review itself notes that Dab and Orn are prone to cyclization and chain termination (refs 41-42), making Dpr the more plausible candidate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of protein$-$RNA interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/53VVOK5O

@misc{pith2026250502037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of protein$-$RNA interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/53VVOK5O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02037}
}
abstract

Since the Hadean era of Earth's history, peptides/proteins and RNA have undergone a complex evolutionary trajectory. Originating from simple monomeric units, these molecules evolved abiotically under various biochemical and biophysical constraints into functional biomolecules that contributed to the emergence of the first living cells. Within these cells, their interactions could then evolve through Darwinian selection. In this review, we examine current understanding of how protein$-$RNA interactions emerged under prebiotic conditions and developed into today's iconic biomolecular machines such as the ribosome. Particular emphasis is placed on the types of physicochemical interactions accessible to early protein$-$RNA complexes and their roles in driving spatial organization and compartmentalization in protocellular environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02037 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Peptide/protein-RNA interactions probably date back to Hadean era of Earth’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A) Schematic representation of r-protein evolution in the LSU, as described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A) Structural formulas of canonical and non-canonical basic amino acids: 2,3- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How RNA-binding proteins interact with RNA: molecules and mechanisms

    Corley M, Burns MC, Yeo GW. How RNA-binding proteins interact with RNA: molecules and mechanisms. Molecular cell. 2020, 78(1):9-29

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Abundant ammonia and nitrogen- rich soluble organic matter in samples from asteroid (101955) Bennu

    • Glavin DP, Dworkin JP, Alexander CM, Aponte JC, Baczynski AA, Barnes JJ, Bechtel HA, Berger EL, Burton AS, Caselli P, Chung AH, et al. Abundant ammonia and nitrogen- rich soluble organic matter in samples from asteroid (101955) Bennu. Nature Astronomy. 2025, 29:1-2. A thorough analysis of organics in samples collected from asteroid Bennu during the NASA...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Soluble organic molecules in samples of the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu

    • Naraoka H, Takano Y, Dworkin JP, Oba Y, Hamase K, Furusho A, Ogawa NO, Hashiguchi M, Fukushima K, Aoki D, Schmitt-Kopplin P, et al. Soluble organic molecules in samples of the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu. Science. 2023, 379(6634):eabn9033. Hayabusa2 mission recovering samples of the Ryugu asteroid – reported detection of early amino acids in st...

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism

    Patel BH, Percivalle C, Ritson DJ, Duffy CD, Sutherland JD. Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism. Nature chemistry. 2015, 7(4):301-7

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Peptides before and during the nucleotide world: An origins story emphasizing cooperation between proteins and nucleic acids

    Fried SD, Fujishima K, Makarov M, Cherepashuk I, Hlouchova K. Peptides before and during the nucleotide world: An origins story emphasizing cooperation between proteins and nucleic acids. Journal of the Royal Society Interface . 2022, 19(187):20210641

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Primordial emergence of a nucleic acid-binding protein via phase separation and statistical ornithine-to-arginine conversion

    Longo LM, Despotovi´ c D, Weil-Ktorza O, Walker MJ, Jab lo´ nska J, Fridmann-Sirkis Y, Varani G, Metanis N, Tawfik DS. Primordial emergence of a nucleic acid-binding protein via phase separation and statistical ornithine-to-arginine conversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020, 117(27):15731-9

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Simple peptides derived from the ribosomal core potentiate RNA polymerase ribozyme function

    Tagami S, Attwater J, Holliger P. Simple peptides derived from the ribosomal core potentiate RNA polymerase ribozyme function. Nature Chemistry. 2017, 9(4):325-32

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Mutually stabilizing interactions between proto- peptides and RNA

    Frenkel-Pinter M, Haynes JW, Mohyeldin AM, Sargon AB, Petrov AS, Krishnamurthy R, Hud NV, Williams LD, Leman LJ. Mutually stabilizing interactions between proto- peptides and RNA. Nature communications. 2020, 11(1):3137

    work page 2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    The future of origin of life research: bridging decades-old divisions

    Preiner M, Asche S, Becker S, Betts HC, Boniface A, Camprubi E, Chandru K, Erastova V, Garg SG, Khawaja N, Kostyrka G, et al. The future of origin of life research: bridging decades-old divisions. Life. 2020, 10(3):20

    2020

  2. [10]

    How amino acids and peptides shaped the RNA world

    Van der Gulik PT, Speijer D. How amino acids and peptides shaped the RNA world. Life. 2015, 5(1):230-46

    2015

  3. [11]

    The origin of life: RNA and protein co-evolution on the ancient earth

    • Tagami S, Li P. The origin of life: RNA and protein co-evolution on the ancient earth. Development, Growth & Differentiation . 2023, 65(3):167-74. A recent review of RNA and protein co-evolution focusing on the impact of cationic peptides and structures of such peptides on R...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Evolution of protein synthesis from an RNA world

    Noller HF. Evolution of protein synthesis from an RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2012, 4(4):a003681

    2012

  5. [13]

    More than the sum of their parts: on the evolution of proteins from peptides

    S¨ oding J, Lupas AN. More than the sum of their parts: on the evolution of proteins from peptides. Bioessays. 2003, 25(9):837-46

    2003

  6. [14]

    Tracing evolution through protein structures: nature captured in a few thousand folds

    Bordin N, Sillitoe I, Lees JG, Orengo C. Tracing evolution through protein structures: nature captured in a few thousand folds. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2021, 8:668184

    2021

  7. [15]

    On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world?

    Lupas AN, Ponting CP, Russell RB. On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world?. Journal of structural biology . 2001, 134(2-3):191-203

    2001

  8. [16]

    Origins of life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?

    Kocher CD, Dill KA. Origins of life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2024, 121(34):e2315000121. 10

    2024

  9. [17]

    A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins

    Alva V, S¨ oding J, Lupas AN. A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins. eLife. 2015, 4:e09410

    2015

  10. [18]

    Bridging themes: short protein segments found in different architectures

    Kolodny R, Nepomnyachiy S, Tawfik DS, Ben-Tal N. Bridging themes: short protein segments found in different architectures. Molecular biology and evolution. 2021, 38(6):2191- 208

    2021

  11. [19]

    Peptides en route from prebiotic to biotic catalysis.Accounts of Chemical Research

    Hlouchov´ a K. Peptides en route from prebiotic to biotic catalysis.Accounts of Chemical Research. 2024, 57(15):2027-37

    2024

  12. [20]

    Root of the tree: the significance, evolution, and origins of the ribosome

    Bowman JC, Petrov AS, Frenkel-Pinter M, Penev PI, Williams LD. Root of the tree: the significance, evolution, and origins of the ribosome. Chemical reviews. 2020, 120(11):4848- 78

    2020

  13. [21]

    Evolution of the ribosome at atomic resolution

    Petrov AS, Bernier CR, Hsiao C, Norris AM, Kovacs NA, Waterbury CC, Stepanov VG, Harvey SC, Fox GE, Wartell RM, Hud NV. Evolution of the ribosome at atomic resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2014, 111(28):10251-6

    2014

  14. [22]

    A hierarchical model for evolution of 23S ribosomal RNA

    Bokov K, Steinberg SV. A hierarchical model for evolution of 23S ribosomal RNA. Nature. 2009, 457(7232):977-80

    2009

  15. [23]

    Peeling the onion: ribosomes are ancient molecular fossils

    Hsiao C, Mohan S, Kalahar BK, Williams LD. Peeling the onion: ribosomes are ancient molecular fossils. Molecular biology and evolution . 2009, 26(11):2415-25

    2009

  16. [24]

    History of the ribosome and the origin of translation

    Petrov AS, Gulen B, Norris AM, Kovacs NA, Bernier CR, Lanier KA, Fox GE, Harvey SC, Wartell RM, Hud NV, Williams LD. History of the ribosome and the origin of translation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2015, 112(50):15396-401

    2015

  17. [25]

    Comparative analysis of ribosomal proteins in complete genomes: an example of reductive evolution at the domain scale.Nucleic acids research

    Lecompte O, Ripp R, Thierry JC, Moras D, Poch O. Comparative analysis of ribosomal proteins in complete genomes: an example of reductive evolution at the domain scale.Nucleic acids research. 2002, 30(24):5382-90

    2002

  18. [26]

    Ribosomal proteins as documents of the transition from qunstruc- tured (poly) peptides to folded proteins

    Lupas AN, Alva V. Ribosomal proteins as documents of the transition from qunstruc- tured (poly) peptides to folded proteins. Journal of Structural Biology . 2017, 198(2):74-81

    2017

  19. [27]

    Frozen in time: the history of proteins

    Kovacs NA, Petrov AS, Lanier KA, Williams LD. Frozen in time: the history of proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution . 2017, 34(5):1252-60

    2017

  20. [28]

    The interplay between peptides and RNA is critical for protoribosome compartmentalization and stability

    •• Codispoti S, Yamaguchi T, Makarov M, Giacobelli VG, Maˇ sek M, Kol´ aˇ r MH, Sanchez Rocha AC, Fujishima K, Zanchetta G, Hlouchov´ a K. The interplay between peptides and RNA is critical for protoribosome compartmentalization and stability. Nucleic Acids Re- search. 2024, 5...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Early selection of the amino acid alphabet was adaptively shaped by biophysical constraints of foldability

    • Makarov M, Sanchez Rocha AC, Krystufek R, Cherepashuk I, Dzmitruk V, Charnavets T, Faustino AM, Lebl M, Fujishima K, Fried SD, Hlouchova K. Early selection of the amino acid alphabet was adaptively shaped by biophysical constraints of foldability. Journal of the American Che...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Evolution of ribosomal protein network architectures

    Timsit Y, Sergeant-Perthuis G, Bennequin D. Evolution of ribosomal protein network architectures. Scientific reports. 2021, 11(1):625

    2021

  23. [31]

    The role of ribosomal protein networks in ribosome dynamics

    Timsit Y, Sergeant-Perthuis G, Bennequin D. The role of ribosomal protein networks in ribosome dynamics. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025, 53(1):gkae1308

    2025

  24. [32]

    Binding of the peptide deformylase on the ribo- some surface modulates the exit tunnel interior

    McGrath H, ˇCernekov´ a M, Kol´ aˇ r MH. Binding of the peptide deformylase on the ribo- some surface modulates the exit tunnel interior. Biophysical Journal. 2022, 121(23):4443-51

    2022

  25. [33]

    The contribution of metal ions to the structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit

    Klein DJ, Moore PB, Steitz TA. The contribution of metal ions to the structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit. RNA. 2004, 10(9):1366-79

    2004

  26. [34]

    A thermodynamic basis for prebiotic amino acid synthesis and the nature of the first genetic code

    Higgs PG, Pudritz RE. A thermodynamic basis for prebiotic amino acid synthesis and the nature of the first genetic code. Astrobiology. 2009, 9(5):483-90

    2009

  27. [35]

    Consensus temporal order of amino acids and evolution of the triplet code

    Trifonov EN. Consensus temporal order of amino acids and evolution of the triplet code. Gene. 2000, 261(1):139-51

    2000

  28. [36]

    The origin of the biologically coded amino acids

    Cleaves II HJ. The origin of the biologically coded amino acids. Journal of Theoretical biology. 2010, 263(4):490-8

    2010

  29. [37]

    Analysis of evolutionarily independent protein- RNA complexes yields a criterion to evaluate the relevance of prebiotic scenarios

    Blanco C, Bayas M, Yan F, Chen IA. Analysis of evolutionarily independent protein- RNA complexes yields a criterion to evaluate the relevance of prebiotic scenarios. Current Biology. 2018, 28(4):526-37

    2018

  30. [38]

    Early life: embracing the RNA world

    V´ azquez-Salazar A, Lazcano A. Early life: embracing the RNA world. Current Biology. 2018, 28(5):R220-2

    2018

  31. [39]

    On the lack of evolutionary continuity between prebiotic peptides and extant enzymes

    Raggi L, Bada JL, Lazcano A. On the lack of evolutionary continuity between prebiotic peptides and extant enzymes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2016; 18(30):20028-32

    2016

  32. [40]

    Prebiotic peptides: Molecular hubs in the origin of life

    Frenkel-Pinter M, Samanta M, Ashkenasy G, Leman LJ. Prebiotic peptides: Molecular hubs in the origin of life. Chemical reviews. 2020, 120(11):4707-65

    2020

  33. [41]

    Selective incorporation of proteinaceous over nonproteinaceous cationic amino acids in model prebiotic oligomerization reactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    Frenkel-Pinter M, Haynes JW, Petrov AS, Burcar BT, Krishnamurthy R, Hud NV, Leman LJ, Williams LD. Selective incorporation of proteinaceous over nonproteinaceous cationic amino acids in model prebiotic oligomerization reactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. ...

    2019

  34. [42]

    Selective synthesis of lysine peptides and the prebiotically plausible synthesis of catalytically active diaminopropionic acid peptide nitriles in water

    • Thoma B, Powner MW. Selective synthesis of lysine peptides and the prebiotically plausible synthesis of catalytically active diaminopropionic acid peptide nitriles in water. Journal of the American Chemical Society . 2023, 145(5):3121-30. Diaminopropionic acid, diaminobutyri...

    2023

  35. [43]

    In vitro evolution reveals noncationic protein–RNA interaction mediated by metal ions

    Giacobelli VG, Fujishima K, Lepˇ s´ ık M, Tretyachenko V, Kadav´ a T, Makarov M, Bedn´ arov´ a L, Nov´ ak P, Hlouchov´ a K. In vitro evolution reveals noncationic protein–RNA interaction mediated by metal ions. Molecular biology and evolution . 2022, 39(3):msac032

    2022

  36. [44]

    RNA–magnesium–protein interactions in large ribosomal subunit

    Petrov AS, Bernier CR, Hsiao C, Okafor CD, Tannenbaum E, Stern J, Gaucher E, Schneider D, Hud NV, Harvey SC, Dean Williams L. RNA–magnesium–protein interactions in large ribosomal subunit. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B . 2012, 116(28):8113-20

    2012

  37. [45]

    The eightfold path to non-enzymatic RNA replication

    Szostak JW. The eightfold path to non-enzymatic RNA replication. Journal of Systems Chemistry. 2012, 3:1-4

    2012

  38. [46]

    The origin of life on the Earth

    Oparin AI. The origin of life on the Earth. Macmillan; 1938

    1938

  39. [47]

    Can coacervation unify disparate hypotheses in the origin of cellular life?

    Ghosh B, Bose R, Tang TD. Can coacervation unify disparate hypotheses in the origin of cellular life?. Current opinion in colloid & interface science . 2021, 52:101415

    2021

  40. [48]

    Compositional and functional diversity of minimal primitive coacervates in a nucleic acid-peptide world

    •• Nakashima KK, Mihoubi FZ, Saraya J, Russell K, Rahmatova F, Robinson J, et al. Compositional and functional diversity of minimal primitive coacervates in a nucleic acid-peptide world. ChemRxiv. 2025; doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-l40ch-v2 This study is focused on the coacervat...

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    Conformation-controlled hydrolysis of polyribonucleotides by se- quential basic polypeptides

    Barbier B, Brack A. Conformation-controlled hydrolysis of polyribonucleotides by se- quential basic polypeptides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1992, 114(9):3511-5

    1992

  42. [50]

    Template-directed RNA polymerization and enhanced ribozyme catalysis inside membrane- less compartments formed by coacervates

    Poudyal RR, Guth-Metzler RM, Veenis AJ, Frankel EA, Keating CD, Bevilacqua PC. Template-directed RNA polymerization and enhanced ribozyme catalysis inside membrane- less compartments formed by coacervates. Nature communications. 2019, 10(1):490

    2019

  43. [51]

    Enhanced ribozyme-catalyzed re- combination and oligonucleotide assembly in peptide-RNA condensates.Angewandte Chemie International Edition

    Le Vay K, Song EY, Ghosh B, Tang TY, Mutschler H. Enhanced ribozyme-catalyzed re- combination and oligonucleotide assembly in peptide-RNA condensates.Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2021, 60(50):26096-104

    2021

  44. [52]

    Charge-density reduction promotes ribozyme activity in RNA–peptide coacervates via RNA fluidization and magnesium partitioning

    Iglesias-Artola JM, Drobot B, Kar M, Fritsch AW, Mutschler H, Dora Tang TY, Kreysing M. Charge-density reduction promotes ribozyme activity in RNA–peptide coacervates via RNA fluidization and magnesium partitioning. Nature chemistry. 2022, 14(4):407-16. 13

    2022

  45. [53]

    Weak effects of prebiotically plausible peptides on self-triphosphorylation ribozyme function

    ••Arriola JT, Poordian S, Valdivia EM, Le T, Leman LJ, Schellinger JG, M¨ uller UF. Weak effects of prebiotically plausible peptides on self-triphosphorylation ribozyme function. RSC Chemical Biology. 2024, 5(11):1122-31. Peptides of prebiotic composition are tested for their ...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.