Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Fundamental Bounds of Wavefront Shaping of Spatially Entangled Photons

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For entangled photon pairs, the best wavefront-shaping gain depends on modulator placement—from about 0.62N to 4.6N.

desk verdict Solid analytical core for 1P-S and 2P-IS, but 'fundamental bounds' overstates the 2P-DS numerical results, which are lower bounds from local optimization. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02221 v1 pith:FRZQ5AJX submitted 2025-05-04 quant-ph physics.optics

Ronen Shekel , Sébastien M. Popoff , Yaron Bromberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics PACS 42.50.Dv42.25.Dd
keywords wavefrontshapingspatiallyentangledphotonstwo-photoncorrelationsscatteringmediatransmissionmatrixenhancementfactoropticalphaseconjugationNP-hardoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks a sharp question: when both photons of a spatially entangled pair scatter through a thick random medium, what is the best that a phase-only spatial light modulator can do, and where should the modulator sit? The answer is that the optimal enhancement of two-photon coincidences is configuration-dependent and differs from the classical wavefront-shaping limit. Shaping one photon after the sample reproduces the classical gain $\eta \approx (\pi/4)N$, while shaping both photons before the sample lowers it to $\eta \approx (\pi/4)^2 N$; detecting both shaped photons in the same spatial mode restores near-perfect correlations, $\eta \approx N$, with phases alone. Shaping both photons after the sample is computationally hard but numerically gives the largest gains, up to about $4.6N$ in the same-mode Gaussian case. This matters for quantum imaging and communication through scattering media, where a classical beacon cannot provide the correct feedback.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-photon coincidence probability written as a squared matrix element, $P_{\alpha\beta} = (2/N)|(H_2 H_1^T)_{\beta\alpha}|^2$, where $H_1,H_2$ are the single-photon transmission matrices from the crystal plane to the two detectors. In the three configurations this becomes $|(F T T^T S F)_{\beta\alpha}|^2$, $|(F T S S T^T F)_{\beta\alpha}|^2$, and $|(F S T T^T S F)_{\beta\alpha}|^2$, where $T$ is the scattering matrix, $S$ the diagonal phase-only SLM matrix, and $F$ the discrete Fourier transform to the far-field detection plane. The advanced wave picture—replacing one detector by a source and the crystal by a mirror—turns each configuration into a classical double-pass propagation problem and supplies the physical intuition for the formulas. The analytic prefactors come from averaging Gaussian moments of $T$, using the identity $\langle |t| \rangle^2/\langle |t|^2 \rangle = \pi/4$. In the after-medium configuration, $S$ appears on both sides of $T T^T$, so every SLM pixel influences the light incident on every other pixel on the second pass; this makes the phase pattern a complex quadratic form in unit-modulus variables, which is the structure the paper identifies as NP-hard-like.

What would settle it

Run an independent search—many random restarts with local refinement, or exhaustive branch-and-bound at small $N$—on a fixed Gaussian IID transmission matrix realization and the same same-mode target; if any phase pattern yields $\eta/N > 1.91$ for distinct detectors or $> 4.6$ for same-mode detection, the reported values are lower bounds, not fundamental bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the fundamental limits of two-photon wavefront shaping are set by a short list of formulas, each tied to a specific modulator and detector geometry. For $N$ spatial modes with phase-only control, one-photon shaping gives $\eta = 1 + (N-1)\pi/4 \approx (\pi/4)N$; shaping both photons before the medium gives $\eta = 1 + (N-1)(\pi/4)^2 \approx (\pi/4)^2 N$; and in the symmetric case where both shaped photons are detected in the same mode, perfect correlations are restored, $\eta = N$ for a unitary medium and $\eta = N+1$ for a Gaussian IID medium. When the modulator shapes both photons after the medium, the paper reports numerically obtained optimal enhancements of $\eta \approx 0.89N$ (unitary) and $\eta \approx 1.91N$ (Gaussian IID) for distinct detectors, and $\eta \approx N$ and $\eta \approx 4.6N$ respectively when both photons land in the same mode. The after-medium gains can exceed the total coincidence rate summed over all modes before shaping, and the paper notes they are bounded above by the largest singular value of the transmission-matrix product. The analytic prefactors follow from Gaussian statistics of the transmission matrix; the after-medium numbers come from numerical optimization of a problem the paper identifies as NP-hard-like.

Load-bearing premise

The after-medium enhancements of $1.91N$ and $4.6N$ are treated as the optimal values, but they come from a local optimizer on a non-convex problem, so no proof yet rules out a better phase pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • When both photons are shaped before the medium and detected in the same spatial mode, phase-only control can fully undo strong scattering, $\eta \approx N$, without amplitude control, which the paper identifies as digital optical phase conjugation.
  • In the after-medium configuration, the optimized coincidence count at one output mode can exceed the total coincidence count summed over all modes before shaping, so scattering alone no longer sets the rate ceiling.
  • Because every SLM pixel affects the light that reaches all other pixels on the second pass, the after-medium optimization is self-consistent and NP-hard-like; standard pixel-by-pixel iterative algorithms fail there.
  • Under incomplete control, enhancement still grows linearly with the number of controlled modes at low degree of control, and the symmetric same-mode cases start at twice the classical slope ($\pi/2$ versus $\pi/4$), a signature the paper traces to coherent backscattering.
  • Classical beacon feedback is not directly usable for both-photon shaping, because the phases that optimize two-photon correlations differ from those that focus a classical beam; the paper presents this as the reason new feedback strategies are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The prefactor pattern hints at a compounding rule the paper does not state: every pass of a phase pattern illuminated by a speckle field may reduce the gain by a factor $\pi/4$, so a chain of $k$ such passes would give $\eta \approx (\pi/4)^k N$; the 1P-S and 2P-IS formulas are consistent with this.
  • The Gaussian-IID after-medium gain rising above the pre-optimization total suggests the optimizer is recruiting open transmission eigenchannels, so the enhancement per realization should correlate with the largest singular value of $TT^\dagger$; that correlation could be tested from the paper's code and data.
  • Because the after-medium problem is NP-hard-like, the reported $1.91N$ and $4.6N$ are best read as benchmarks of the local gradient optimizer on a non-convex landscape; a dedicated global optimizer at small $N$ could either confirm tightness or find better patterns.
  • The same-mode 'OPC' configurations offer a self-aligned way to restore correlations without ever characterizing the medium, which could simplify entanglement distribution through fibers or tissue if feedback is taken directly from coincidence counts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies optimal wavefront shaping of spatially entangled photon pairs that both propagate through a thick scattering medium, modeled by either a random unitary or a Gaussian IID transmission matrix. Three configurations are analyzed: one-photon shaping (1P-S), two-photon illumination shaping (2P-IS), and two-photon detection shaping (2P-DS), each with an optional symmetric detection variant labeled OPC. The main results are analytical expressions for the enhancement in 1P-S and 2P-IS, η=(π/4)N and η=(π/4)^2N respectively, an exact N prefactor for the symmetric 2P-IS(OPC) case, and numerical claims of η≈1.91N (non-symmetric) and η≈4.6N (symmetric) for 2P-DS in the Gaussian IID model. The paper argues that the 2P-DS optimization problem resembles NP-hard MAXQP/XY spin-glass problems, and that the numerically obtained phases achieve enhancements that can exceed the total pre-optimization coincidence rate.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful contribution to quantum wavefront shaping: it identifies configuration-dependent enhancement prefactors, demonstrates that phase-only control can restore perfect two-photon correlations in the OPC variants, and highlights a physically interesting self-consistent optimization problem in the 2P-DS geometry. The analytical derivations in SI S2 are explicit and self-contained, and the code and data are provided, which supports reproducibility. For the 1P-S, 2P-IS, and 2P-IS(OPC) configurations, the results are clean and convincing. However, the paper's headline claim of 'fundamental bounds' for 2P-DS rests on numerical results from a local optimizer on a non-convex landscape, and the paper's own SI states that a formal complexity analysis is beyond scope. This means the 2P-DS prefactors are achieved enhancements (lower bounds), not proven optimal enhancements, which weakens the central claim as currently worded.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II.C, SI §S3–S4] The reported 2P-DS enhancements η≈1.91N and η≈4.6N are described in the abstract and main text as optimal and as 'fundamental bounds,' but they are obtained with PyTorch's L-BFGS, a local optimizer, applied to the non-convex objective P_{αβ}^{(2P-DS)} = (1/(2N)) |(F S T^T T S F)_{βα}|^2. SI §S3 explicitly states that 'a formal complexity analysis for this specific problem ... is beyond the scope of this work.' Consequently, these numerical values are rigorous lower bounds on the maximum enhancement, not certificates of the global maximum. This does not invalidate the numerical results, but it does invalidate the claim that the prefactors 1.91 and 4.6 are the optimal (maximal) enhancements. The authors should either (i) reframe the 2P-DS claims as achieved enhancements or lower bounds throughout the abstract, main text, and title, or (ii) provide a global-optimality certificate, for example by exhaustive search or rigorous upper bounds for small N that match the numerical values.
  2. [Intro, §II.C, SI §S4.E] The finite-size status of the 2P-DS numbers is also not addressed. SI §S4.E states that 'there does seem to be a continued non-negligible dependence on N ... even for a few thousand modes,' and Fig. S6 shows η/N still increasing at N values beyond 512. The abstract quotes η≈1.91N and η≈4.6N without this qualification, so these are finite-N, local-optimizer values, not established asymptotic prefactors. The sentence in the Introduction that 'these results are determined by the optimal shaping phases, regardless of the method used to obtain them' is therefore too strong; the method (local optimization) is exactly what prevents the conclusion that the phases are optimal. Please qualify these claims, for example by reporting 2P-DS values as numerical achievements at N=512 and by presenting the observed N-dependence as an open issue.
minor comments (5)
  1. [SI §S4.D] The heading '2P-DS (OPC) configurtation' contains a typo; it should be 'configuration'.
  2. [SI §S6.A] The notation '1-PS' is used once in the text, while the rest of the paper uses '1P-S'; please make the notation uniform.
  3. [References] Reference 23 contains 'V os' which should be 'Vos', and Reference 43 contains 'F oundations' which should be 'Foundations'.
  4. [§II.C] The sentence 'we note that it is bounded by σ1^2, where σ1 is the maximal singular value of TT^T' is ambiguous: the antecedent of 'it' could be the enhancement or the total optimized coincidence counts. Since η/N ≈ 4.6 exceeds typical values of σ1^2 ≈ 4 in the Gaussian IID model, the bound presumably applies to the total optimized coincidence counts; please clarify.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] Please change 'errorbars' to 'error bars' for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytical enhancements follow from stated random-matrix ensembles and explicit optimal-phase constructions, and the 2P-DS values are numerical optimization results, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against its stated models rather than circular. For 1P-S, 2P-IS, and 2P-IS(OPC), the enhancement factors are computed analytically from the assumed complex-Gaussian or unitary transmission-matrix statistics: the paper explicitly constructs the optimal SLM phases (e.g., setting phases to cancel arg(f_alpha m) and arg(t'_beta m) in Eq. S11, and setting Phi_n = -(1/2)[arg(t_alpha n)+arg(t_beta n)] in Eq. S14), evaluates the averaged optimized and pre-optimization probabilities using the Gaussian moment theorem, and obtains eta = 1+(N-1)pi/4, 1+(N-1)(pi/4)^2, and N+b. No parameter is fitted to the target enhancement, and no result is defined in terms of the quantity it purports to predict. The 2P-DS configuration is treated honestly as a numerical optimization: the paper reports what its PyTorch L-BFGS optimizer achieves (eta approximately 0.89N, 1.91N, and 4.6N) and explicitly notes in SI S3 that a formal complexity analysis and guaranteed global-optimality certificate are beyond scope. This is a limitation on the strength of the 'fundamental bound' wording for 2P-DS, but it is not circularity: the numerical optimizer maximizes the same coincidence probability whose formula is independently derived, and the reported values are achieved values rather than quantities forced by construction. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 7, 20, 30) are contextual or describe prior experimental techniques, but none are load-bearing as an unverified uniqueness theorem or ansatz. No step in the paper reduces by definition to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on idealized modeling assumptions: a maximally entangled N-mode input, random-matrix scattering models, ideal phase-only SLM pixels, far-field Fourier detection, and the advanced-wave reciprocity identity. No free parameters are fitted; all reported pre-factors are derived or simulated from these assumptions.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SPDC source emits the maximally entangled N-mode EPR state |Ψin⟩ = (1/√(2N)) Σ_x a†_x a†_x |vac⟩ in the thin-crystal regime.
    This is the input state for every probability formula (Eq. 1, SI Eq. S2). Real SPDC states have finite correlation width and are not exactly maximally entangled over all N modes; the bounds would change for non-maximal entanglement.
  • domain assumption The scattering medium is modeled by a transmission matrix T that is either Haar-random unitary or Gaussian IID complex circular, and unitary moments match Gaussian moments to leading order in 1/N.
    Analytical pre-factors π/4, (π/4)^2, and N follow from Gaussian moment factorization and column independence (SI S2). Real media have losses, mode correlations, polarization, and non-universal statistics.
  • domain assumption The SLM is an ideal phase-only diagonal matrix S with N independent pixels, placed in an image plane of the crystal, with no amplitude modulation, crosstalk, or pixel coupling.
    Optimal phases are constructed by setting each pixel to the conjugate phase of a single term (SI S2, Eqs. S11-S15). Real SLMs have finite phase range, flatness errors, and inter-pixel coupling that would reduce the achievable enhancement.
  • domain assumption Propagation from the sample or SLM plane to the detectors is exactly a discrete Fourier transform F, and detectors are point modes α and β in the far field.
    The probabilities in Eq. (1) use F for far-field propagation. Finite detector apertures and pixel sizes introduce averaging that is not modeled.
  • standard math For reciprocal linear optical systems, the two-photon coincidence probability equals the classical intensity in the advanced wave picture, Pαβ ∝ |(H2 H1^T)βα|^2.
    This reciprocity identity (SI S1, Eq. S3) is used to interpret all three configurations as classical shaping problems. It is a known result from Klyshko's advanced wave picture and is not an ad hoc invention.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fundamental Bounds of Wavefront Shaping of Spatially Entangled Photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FRZQ5AJX

@misc{pith2026250502221,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fundamental Bounds of Wavefront Shaping of Spatially Entangled Photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FRZQ5AJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02221}
}
abstract

Wavefront shaping enables control of classical light through scattering media. Extending these techniques to spatially entangled photons promises new quantum applications, but their fundamental limits, especially when both photons scatter, remain unclear. Here, we theoretically and numerically investigate the enhancement of two-photon correlations through thick scattering media. We analyze configurations where a spatial light modulator shapes one or both photons, either before or after the medium, and show that the optimal enhancement differs fundamentally from classical expectations. For a system with $N$ modes, we show that shaping one photon yields the classical enhancement $\eta \approx (\pi/4)N$, while shaping both photons before the medium reduces it to $\eta \approx (\pi/4)^2N$. However, in some symmetric detection schemes, when both photons are measured at the same mode, perfect correlations are restored with $\eta \approx N$, resembling digital optical phase conjugation. Conversely, shaping both photons after the medium leads to a complex, NP-hard-like optimization problem, yet achieves superior enhancements, up to $\eta \approx 4.6N$. These results reveal unique quantum effects in complex media and identify strategies for quantum imaging and communication through scattering environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02221 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The three configurations for wavefront shaping of spatially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Depiction of the three analogous classical setups according [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Summary of the enhancement pre-factor for the five different analyzed configurations. The enhancements were calculated numerically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Scaling of the enhancement pre-factor as a function of the degree of control, defined as the ratio DOC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author I. M. \ Vellekoop \ and\ author A. P. \ Mosk ,\ title title Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media , \ @noop journal journal Optics letters \ volume 32 ,\ pages 2309--2311 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  7. [7]

    author author A. P. \ Mosk , author A. Lagendijk , author G. Lerosey , \ and\ author M. Fink ,\ title title Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media , \ @noop journal journal Nature photonics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 283--292 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    author author S. M. \ Popoff , author G. Lerosey , author R. Carminati , author M. Fink , author A. C. \ Boccara , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: an approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 104 ,\ pages 100601 ( ...

    work page 2010

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    author author I. M. \ Vellekoop ,\ title title Feedback-based wavefront shaping , \ @noop journal journal Optics express \ volume 23 ,\ pages 12189--12206 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  2. [10]

    Cao , author A

    author author H. Cao , author A. P. \ Mosk , \ and\ author S. Rotter ,\ title title Shaping the propagation of light in complex media , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 18 ,\ pages 994--1007 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  3. [11]

    Gigan , author O

    author author S. Gigan , author O. Katz , author H. B. \ De Aguiar , author E. R. \ Andresen , author A. Aubry , author J. Bertolotti , author E. Bossy , author D. Bouchet , author J. Brake , author S. Brasselet , et al. ,\ title title Roadmap on wavefront shaping and deep ima...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Lib \ and\ author Y

    author author O. Lib \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Quantum light in complex media and its applications , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 18 ,\ pages 986--993 ( year 2022 a ) NoStop

    2022

  5. [13]

    author author S. K. \ Goyal , author F. S. \ Roux , author T. Konrad , author A. Forbes , et al. ,\ title title The effect of turbulence on entanglement-based free-space quantum key distribution with photonic orbital angular momentum , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Optics...

    2016

  6. [14]

    Ndagano , author B

    author author B. Ndagano , author B. Perez-Garcia , author F. S. \ Roux , author M. McLaren , author C. Rosales-Guzman , author Y. Zhang , author O. Mouane , author R. I. \ Hernandez-Aranda , author T. Konrad , \ and\ author A. Forbes ,\ title title Characterizing quantum chan...

    2017

  7. [15]

    Liu , author K

    author author C. Liu , author K. Pang , author Z. Zhao , author P. Liao , author R. Zhang , author H. Song , author Y. Cao , author J. Du , author L. Li , author H. Song , et al. ,\ title title Single-end adaptive optics compensation for emulated turbulence in a bi-directional...

    2019

  8. [16]

    Cao , author Y.-H

    author author Y. Cao , author Y.-H. \ Li , author K.-X. \ Yang , author Y.-F. \ Jiang , author S.-L. \ Li , author X.-L. \ Hu , author M. Abulizi , author C.-L. \ Li , author W. Zhang , author Q.-C. \ Sun , et al. ,\ title title Long-distance free-space measurement-device-inde...

    2020

  9. [17]

    author author L. V. \ Amitonova , author T. B. \ Tentrup , author I. M. \ Vellekoop , \ and\ author P. W. \ Pinkse ,\ title title Quantum key establishment via a multimode fiber , \ @noop journal journal Optics express \ volume 28 ,\ pages 5965--5981 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  10. [18]

    author author C. J. \ Pugh , author J.-F. \ Lavigne , author J.-P. \ Bourgoin , author B. L. \ Higgins , \ and\ author T. Jennewein ,\ title title Adaptive optics benefit for quantum key distribution uplink from ground to a satellite , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Optical ...

    2020

  11. [19]

    Beenakker , author J

    author author C. Beenakker , author J. Venderbos , \ and\ author M. Van Exter ,\ title title Two-photon speckle as a probe of multi-dimensional entanglement , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 102 ,\ pages 193601 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  12. [20]

    Peeters , author J

    author author W. Peeters , author J. Moerman , \ and\ author M. Van Exter ,\ title title Observation of two-photon speckle patterns , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 104 ,\ pages 173601 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  13. [21]

    Carpenter , author C

    author author J. Carpenter , author C. Xiong , author M. J. \ Collins , author J. Li , author T. F. \ Krauss , author B. J. \ Eggleton , author A. S. \ Clark , \ and\ author J. Schr \"o der ,\ title title Mode multiplexed single-photon and classical channels in a few-mode fibe...

    2013

  14. [22]

    Defienne , author M

    author author H. Defienne , author M. Barbieri , author B. Chalopin , author B. Chatel , author I. Walmsley , author B. Smith , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Nonclassical light manipulation in a multiple-scattering medium , \ @noop journal journal Optics letters \ volu...

    2014

  15. [23]

    author author T. J. \ Huisman , author S. R. \ Huisman , author A. P. \ Mosk , \ and\ author P. W. \ Pinkse ,\ title title Controlling single-photon fock-state propagation through opaque scattering media , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 116 ,\ pages 603--60...

    2014

  16. [24]

    author author N. H. \ Valencia , author S. Goel , author W. McCutcheon , author H. Defienne , \ and\ author M. Malik ,\ title title Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1112--1116 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  17. [25]

    Shekel , author O

    author author R. Shekel , author O. Lib , author R. Gutiérrez-Cuevas , author S. M. \ Popoff , author A. Ling , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Shaping single photons through multimode optical fibers using mechanical perturbations , \ @noop journal journal APL Photoni...

    2023

  18. [26]

    Devaux , author A

    author author F. Devaux , author A. Mosset , author S. M. \ Popoff , \ and\ author E. Lantz ,\ title title Restoring and tailoring very high dimensional spatial entanglement of a biphoton state transmitted through a scattering medium , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Optics...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Defienne , author M

    author author H. Defienne , author M. Barbieri , author I. A. \ Walmsley , author B. J. \ Smith , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Two-photon quantum walk in a multimode fiber , \ @noop journal journal Science advances \ volume 2 ,\ pages e1501054 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  20. [28]

    author author T. A. W. \ Wolterink , author R. Uppu , author G. Ctistis , author W. L. \ Vos , author K.-J. \ Boller , \ and\ author P. W. H. \ Pinkse ,\ title title Programmable two-photon quantum interference in 10 ^ 3 channels in opaque scattering media , \ @noop journal jo...

    2016

  21. [29]

    Defienne , author M

    author author H. Defienne , author M. Reichert , \ and\ author J. W. \ Fleischer ,\ title title Adaptive quantum optics with spatially entangled photon pairs , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 121 ,\ pages 233601 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  22. [30]

    Peng , author Y

    author author Y. Peng , author Y. Qiao , author T. Xiang , \ and\ author X. Chen ,\ title title Manipulation of the spontaneous parametric down-conversion process in space and frequency domains via wavefront shaping , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 398...

    2018

  23. [31]

    Lib , author G

    author author O. Lib , author G. Hasson , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Real-time shaping of entangled photons by classical control and feedback , \ @noop journal journal Science Advances \ volume 6 ,\ pages eabb6298 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  24. [32]

    Lib \ and\ author Y

    author author O. Lib \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Pump-shaping of non-collinear and non-degenerate entangled photons , \ @noop journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 45 ,\ pages 6827--6830 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  25. [33]

    Soro , author E

    author author G. Soro , author E. Lantz , author A. Mosset , \ and\ author F. Devaux ,\ title title Quantum spatial correlations imaging through thick scattering media: experiments and comparison with simulations of the biphoton wave function , \ @noop journal journal Journal ...

    2021

  26. [34]

    Cameron , author B

    author author P. Cameron , author B. Courme , author C. Vernière , author R. Pandya , author D. Faccio , \ and\ author H. Defienne ,\ title title Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 383 ,\ pages 1142--1148 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  27. [35]

    Shekel , author O

    author author R. Shekel , author O. Lib , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Shaping entangled photons through arbitrary scattering media using an advanced wave beacon , \ @noop journal journal Optica Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 303--309 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  28. [36]

    Courme , author C

    author author B. Courme , author C. Verni \`e re , author M. Joly , author D. Faccio , author S. Gigan , \ and\ author H. Defienne ,\ title title Non-classical optimization through complex media , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24283 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Shekel , author O

    author author R. Shekel , author O. Lib , author A. Sardas , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Shaping entangled photons through emulated turbulent atmosphere , \ @noop journal journal OSA Continuum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2339--2350 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  30. [38]

    author author I. M. \ Vellekoop \ and\ author A. Mosk ,\ title title Phase control algorithms for focusing light through turbid media , \ @noop journal journal Optics communications \ volume 281 ,\ pages 3071--3080 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  31. [39]

    author author S. P. \ Walborn , author C. Monken , author S. P \'a dua , \ and\ author P. S. \ Ribeiro ,\ title title Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion , \ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 495 ,\ pages 87--139 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  32. [40]

    author author J. C. \ Howell , author R. S. \ Bennink , author S. J. \ Bentley , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title Realization of the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox using momentum- and position-entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down conversion , \ @noop jo...

    2004

  33. [41]

    author author J. W. \ Goodman ,\ @noop title Speckle phenomena in optics: theory and applications \ ( publisher Roberts and Company Publishers ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  34. [42]

    Goetschy \ and\ author A

    author author A. Goetschy \ and\ author A. Stone ,\ title title Filtering random matrices: the effect of incomplete channel control in multiple scattering , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 111 ,\ pages 063901 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  35. [43]

    author author D. Klyshko ,\ title title A simple method of preparing pure states of an optical field, of implementing the einstein--podolsky--rosen experiment, and of demonstrating the complementarity principle , \ @noop journal journal Soviet Physics Uspekhi \ volume 31 ,\ pa...

    1988

  36. [44]

    Belinskii \ and\ author D

    author author A. Belinskii \ and\ author D. Klyshko ,\ title title Two-photon optics: diffraction, holography, and transformation of two-dimensional signals , \ @noop journal journal Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics \ volume 78 ,\ pages 259--262 ( year 19...

    1994

  37. [45]

    Zheng , author J.-S

    author author Y. Zheng , author J.-S. \ Xu , author C.-F. \ Li , \ and\ author G.-C. \ Guo ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02088 title Theory of monochromatic advanced-wave picture and applications in biphoton optics , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02088 arXiv:2412...

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Cui \ and\ author C

    author author M. Cui \ and\ author C. Yang ,\ title title Implementation of a digital optical phase conjugation system and its application to study the robustness of turbidity suppression by phase conjugation , \ @noop journal journal Optics express \ volume 18 ,\ pages 3444--...

    2010

  39. [47]

    author author R. W. \ Boyd , author A. L. \ Gaeta , \ and\ author E. Giese ,\ title title Nonlinear optics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2008 )\ pp.\ pages 1097--1110 NoStop

    2008

  40. [48]

    Arora , author E

    author author S. Arora , author E. Berger , author H. Elad , author G. Kindler , \ and\ author M. Safra ,\ title title On non-approximability for quadratic programs , \ in\ @noop booktitle 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05) \ ( organization...

    2005

  41. [49]

    author author P. M. \ Pardalos \ and\ author S. A. \ Vavasis ,\ title title Quadratic programming with one negative eigenvalue is np-hard , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Global optimization \ volume 1 ,\ pages 15--22 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  42. [50]

    Lucas ,\ title title Ising formulations of many np problems , \ @noop journal journal Frontiers in physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 5 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    author author A. Lucas ,\ title title Ising formulations of many np problems , \ @noop journal journal Frontiers in physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 5 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  43. [51]

    Pierangeli , author G

    author author D. Pierangeli , author G. Marcucci , \ and\ author C. Conti ,\ title title Large-scale photonic ising machine by spatial light modulation , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 122 ,\ pages 213902 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  44. [52]

    Pierangeli , author M

    author author D. Pierangeli , author M. Rafayelyan , author C. Conti , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Scalable spin-glass optical simulator , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 15 ,\ pages 034087 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  45. [53]

    Fundamental bounds of Wavefront Shaping of Spatially Entangled Photons

    @noop howpublished https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15300939 ,\ note code and data for publication: "Fundamental bounds of Wavefront Shaping of Spatially Entangled Photons" NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    Akkermans \ and\ author G

    author author E. Akkermans \ and\ author G. Montambaux ,\ @noop title Mesoscopic physics of electrons and photons \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  47. [55]

    Carminati \ and\ author J

    author author R. Carminati \ and\ author J. C. \ Schotland ,\ @noop title Principles of scattering and transport of light \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  48. [56]

    Lib \ and\ author Y

    author author O. Lib \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Thermal biphotons , \ @noop journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 7 ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

    2022

  49. [57]

    Leedumrongwatthanakun , author L

    author author S. Leedumrongwatthanakun , author L. Innocenti , author H. Defienne , author T. Juffmann , author A. Ferraro , author M. Paternostro , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Programmable linear quantum networks with a multimode fibre , \ @noop journal journal Natu...

    2020

  50. [58]

    Goel , author S

    author author S. Goel , author S. Leedumrongwatthanakun , author N. H. \ Valencia , author W. McCutcheon , author A. Tavakoli , author C. Conti , author P. W. \ Pinkse , \ and\ author M. Malik ,\ title title Inverse design of high-dimensional quantum optical circuits in a comp...

    2024

  51. [59]

    author author N. H. \ Valencia , author S. Goel , author A. Ma , author S. Leedumrongwatthanakun , author F. Graffitti , author A. Fedrizzi , author W. McCutcheon , \ and\ author M. Malik ,\ title title A multiplexed programmable quantum photonic network , \ in\ @noop booktitl...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Lahini , author Y

    author author Y. Lahini , author Y. Bromberg , author D. N. \ Christodoulides , \ and\ author Y. Silberberg ,\ title title Quantum correlations in two-particle anderson localization , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 105 ,\ pages 163905 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  53. [61]

    author author A. N. \ Black , author E. Giese , author B. Braverman , author N. Zollo , author S. M. \ Barnett , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title Quantum nonlocal aberration cancellation , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 123 ,\ pages 143603 ( ...

    2019

  54. [62]

    Safadi , author O

    author author M. Safadi , author O. Lib , author H.-C. \ Lin , author C. W. \ Hsu , author A. Goetschy , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Coherent backscattering of entangled photon pairs , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 19 ,\ pages 562--568 ( year 202...

    2023

  55. [63]

    Bajar , author R

    author author K. Bajar , author R. Chatterjee , author V. S. \ Bhat , \ and\ author S. Mujumdar ,\ title title Partial immunity of two-photon correlation against wavefront distortion for spatially entangled photons , \ @noop journal journal APL Quantum \ volume 2 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  56. [64]

    Monin , author M

    author author S. Monin , author M. Alterman , \ and\ author A. Levin ,\ title title Rapid wavefront shaping using an optical gradient acquisition , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13711 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  57. [65]

    del Hougne \ and\ author G

    author author P. del Hougne \ and\ author G. Lerosey ,\ title title Leveraging chaos for wave-based analog computation: Demonstration with indoor wireless communication signals , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 8 ,\ pages 041037 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  58. [66]

    Xia , author K

    author author F. Xia , author K. Kim , author Y. Eliezer , author S. Han , author L. Shaughnessy , author S. Gigan , \ and\ author H. Cao ,\ title title Nonlinear optical encoding enabled by recurrent linear scattering , \ @noop journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 18 ,\ ...

    2024

  59. [67]

    Yildirim , author N

    author author M. Yildirim , author N. U. \ Dinc , author I. Oguz , author D. Psaltis , \ and\ author C. Moser ,\ title title Nonlinear processing with linear optics , \ @noop journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 18 ,\ pages 1076--1082 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  60. [68]

    author author C. C. \ Gerry \ and\ author P. L. \ Knight ,\ @noop title Introductory quantum optics \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  61. [69]

    author author C. W. \ Beenakker ,\ title title Random-matrix theory of quantum transport , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of modern physics \ volume 69 ,\ pages 731 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  62. [70]

    Mastrodonato \ and\ author R

    author author C. Mastrodonato \ and\ author R. Tumulka ,\ title title Elementary proof for asymptotics of large haar-distributed unitary matrices , \ @noop journal journal Letters in Mathematical Physics \ volume 82 ,\ pages 51--59 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  63. [71]

    author author I. M. \ Vellekoop \ and\ author A. P. \ Mosk ,\ title title Universal optimal transmission of light through disordered materials , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 101 ,\ pages 120601 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.