Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 68 references

Analytical and numerical routes to strong coupling in $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the first subleading strong-coupling coefficients for twisted Wilson-loop correlators in the $\mathbb{Z}_M$ orbifold $\mathcal{N}=2$ quiver theory, and conjectures the next ones from numerical fits.

desk verdict Solid technical advance on strong-coupling expansions in N=2 quivers, with a load-bearing but clearly flagged conjecture on the top-order coefficients. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02525 v1 pith:RLOBKYN2 submitted 2025-05-05 hep-th

Pieter-Jan De Smet , Alessandro Pini , Paolo Vallarino This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords N=2superconformalquivergaugetheoryZ_MorbifoldtwistedWilsonloopcorrelatorsstrongcouplingexpansionsupersymmetriclocalizationBesseloperatorintegratednumericalintegral-equationmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In the planar $\mathbb{Z}_M$ quiver theory obtained as an orbifold of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM, some observables have exact expressions as Fredholm determinants of a Bessel $X$-matrix, so their strong-coupling expansions can be generated to any order. This paper targets observables that lack such a closed form: correlators of coincident twisted Wilson loops and the next-to-planar integrated correlator of two Higgs-branch operators with a Wilson line. It derives the first three coefficients of the large-$\lambda$ expansion of the two-point twisted Wilson-loop correlator analytically, extends the same treatment to the three-point correlator, and computes the next-to-planar integrated correlator through order $\lambda^0$. A quadrature-based numerical method that solves an integral equation independently reproduces the analytic coefficients and supplies the fourth coefficient, which the paper conjectures in closed form. If correct, these are the first subleading strong-coupling data for observables that cannot be written as Fredholm determinants.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the semi-infinite $X$-matrix (2.23), built from Bessel functions, and its resolvent $D^{(\alpha)} = (1-s_\alpha X)^{-1}$; every observable here is a bilinear in $D^{(\alpha)}$. The analytic method expands ratios of modified Bessel functions and the matrix elements $w^{(\ell)}_{n,m}=\langle (x\partial_x)^n \phi^{(\ell)}(x)| s_\alpha X(1-s_\alpha X)^{-1} |(x\partial_x)^m \phi^{(\ell)}(x)\rangle$ at large coupling, organizing terms by degree in $g=\sqrt{\lambda}/(4\pi)$ and evaluating them through the generating functions $G^{(0)},G^{(1)},G^{(2)}$ given in Appendix A. The numerical method replaces the resolvent by an integral equation for $Z(t)$ solved with a quadrature-based discretization, which evaluates the same bilinears without assuming any strong-coupling form. The two ingredients together fix the coefficients: analytics for the first corrections, numerics for verification and for the next conjectured order.

What would settle it

Compute the coefficient of $\lambda^{-3/2}$ in the two-point twisted Wilson-loop correlator at several $s_\alpha$ using a method that does not assume the ansatz (4.34), for example high-precision evaluation of the exact integral representation at $\lambda$ near $10^6$ followed by an unconstrained fit; if the extracted values do not lie on the quadratic polynomial in $I_1(s_\alpha)$, the conjectured strong-coupling expansion is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, in the planar limit, the ratio of the two-point twisted Wilson-loop correlator to the connected $\mathcal{N}=4$ normalization expands as $1+\Delta w_\alpha \sim \kappa_0(1+\kappa_1/\sqrt{\lambda}+\kappa_2/\lambda+\kappa_3/\lambda^{3/2}+O(\lambda^{-2}))$ with $\kappa_0 = (1/s_\alpha)(I_0(s_\alpha)/2)^2$, $\kappa_1 = 2$, $\kappa_2 = 3 - \pi I_1(s_\alpha)/2$, and conjectured $\kappa_3 = 15/4 - (3/2)\pi I_1(s_\alpha) - \pi^2 I_1(s_\alpha)^2$, where $s_\alpha=\sin^2(\pi\alpha/M)$ and $I_0,I_1$ are the integrals defined in (4.3). The three-point twisted correlator obeys the analogous expansion (4.39), and the next-to-planar integrated correlator starts as $\mathcal{W}^{(NL)} \sim -\lambda^{3/2}/128 + \sqrt{\lambda}(8\log 2 -1)/512 + (2\zeta_3+32\log^2 2-1)/256 + O(\lambda^{-1/2})$. The first coefficients are derived analytically through the generating functions of Appendix A; the $\lambda^{-3/2}$ coefficients are numerical conjectures constrained by the same generating-function structure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the assumed functional form for the fitted coefficients: a degree-two polynomial in $I_1(s_\alpha)$ with all $s_\alpha$ dependence factored into the leading coefficient, as stated in equations (4.34) and (4.52). If that form is wrong, the conjectured $\lambda^{-3/2}$ terms are wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The strong-coupling expansion of the general $n$-point correlator of coincident twisted Wilson loops follows directly from the 2-point and 3-point results, because in the planar limit the exact $n$-point function factorizes into products of 2-point and 3-point correlators.
  • The appearance of $I_1(s_\alpha)$ in the coefficients is equivalent to an $s_\alpha$-dependent rescaling $\lambda \to \lambda - 4\pi I_1(s_\alpha)\sqrt{\lambda} + 4\pi^2 I_1(s_\alpha)^2$, so each twisted sector feels a different effective coupling.
  • The next-to-planar integrated correlator expansion (5.7) provides a concrete strong-coupling prediction for holographic computations beyond the supergravity approximation.
  • The numerical algorithm yields more accurate strong-coupling coefficients than Padé approximants at lower computational cost and remains applicable where the analytic method cannot yet reach.
  • Because the generating functions are operator-independent, the same analytic machinery can be reused for any planar observable whose large-$\lambda$ expansion reduces to the coefficients $w^{(\ell)}_{n,m}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: the factorization of all $s_\alpha$ dependence into the leading coefficient suggests that the entire perturbative-in-$1/\sqrt{\lambda}$ series might be resummable into a single function of the rescaled coupling; testing this at order $\lambda^{-2}$ would decide.
  • Beyond the paper's claims: a natural extension is to apply the same numerical integral-equation method to integrated correlators of moment-map and Coulomb-branch operators, where only the leading strong-coupling term is known; the method's accuracy at large $\lambda$ should expose the next coefficient.
  • Beyond the paper's claims: the conjectured polynomial structure of $\kappa_3$ in $I_1(s_\alpha)$ could be checked by deriving the $\lambda^{-3/2}$ coefficient through a purely analytic route; if the quadratic ansatz holds, the same structure likely controls higher orders.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies the planar strong-coupling expansion of two classes of observables in the Z_M quiver gauge theory obtained by orbifolding N=4 SYM: correlators of n coincident twisted Wilson loops and the next-to-planar integrated correlator of two moment-map operators in the presence of a Wilson line. For the 2-point and 3-point twisted Wilson-loop correlators the authors derive analytically the first three coefficients of the large-lambda expansion using generating functions for the matrix-model resolvent, and they present numerical data obtained from a Nystrom-type discretization of the relevant integral equations. The next coefficient at order lambda^{-3/2} is extracted numerically under a structural polynomial ansatz, and the same fitting procedure is used for the integrated correlator. The paper is clearly written and provides a reproducible numerical algorithm, and the analytic results for the lower-order coefficients are checked against the numerics.

Significance. If the claimed expansions are correct, this is one of the first systematic computations of subleading strong-coupling corrections for observables that are not expressible as Fredholm determinants of Bessel operators. The analytic derivation of kappa_0, kappa_1, kappa_2 and c_0, c_1, c_2 via generating functions is a genuine technical contribution, and the numerical method is an efficient and independently useful tool that is validated against weak-coupling series. The conjectured higher-order coefficients are clearly labeled as numerical, which is commendable; however, because they are incorporated into the final expansions (4.1), (4.39) and (5.7), their status needs to be made precise or the load-bearing assumption behind them needs to be supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1.3, Eq. (4.34)] The claim that kappa_3 is a degree-two polynomial in I_1(s_alpha) is the load-bearing step for (4.2d), but the supporting argument is incomplete. The expansion (A.3) of w(l)_{0,0} contains an I_2(s_alpha) term at order g^{-3}, which is exactly the order that contributes to kappa_3 at lambda^{-3/2}. The manuscript asserts that the generating functions constrain kappa_3 to be a polynomial in I_0 and I_1 only, but it does not demonstrate the required cancellation of I_2(s_alpha) in the sums S^(P). Since the numerical fits use a discrete set of M and alpha values, they cannot easily distinguish I_1(s_alpha)^2 from I_2(s_alpha); the agreement in Figs. 3-5 is therefore not sufficient to establish the specific polynomial form. Please either prove the cancellation analytically or explicitly state that (4.2d) is a numerical conjecture and separate it from the analytically derived part of (4.1).
  2. [Section 4.2.2, Eqs. (4.52) and (4.40d)] The same structural issue affects the 3-point coefficient c_3 and its constituents c_even_3 and c_odd_3. The ansatz (4.52) assumes factorized I_0 and s_alpha dependence and at most quadratic dependence on I_1(s_alpha), but the expansion (A.3) again introduces I_2(s_alpha) at the relevant order. Table 4 and Figs. 4-5 show consistency of the fitted ansatz with the numerical data, but consistency on a discrete grid does not rule out I_2-dependent terms. Because (4.40d) is presented as part of the final expansion (4.39), this is a load-bearing gap for the advertised order lambda^{-3/2} result; the authors should either provide an analytic argument for the cancellation or clearly mark c_3 as conjectural.
  3. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.8)] The coefficients in the expansion (5.8) for R(lambda) are obtained by fitting numerical data to the assumed inverse-power ansatz (5.16), and the same holds for the R(lambda) contribution entering the final result (5.7). This is acceptable for a numerical prediction, but the paper should state explicitly that the announced expansion of W^(NL) in (5.7) relies on numerically conjectured coefficients and is not an analytic derivation. This distinction matters because the abstract and introduction emphasize an 'analytical method' and 'numerical algorithm' as separate routes; the present presentation of (5.7) blurs that boundary.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] The name 'Nyrström method' should be spelled 'Nyström method'.
  2. [Section 4.3] The subsection title 'The n-point function' is accurate, but Eqs. (4.55)-(4.58) use 2n or 2n+1 Wilson loops; a reader may trip over the notational shift from n to 2n. A sentence clarifying the parity conventions would help.
  3. [Table 3 and Eq. (4.34)] The table reports g0, pi*g1, pi^2*g2, which is useful, but it would be helpful to state explicitly that the fit was performed on kappa_3 values extracted from the lambda^{-3/2} coefficient of the data for many values of s_alpha, and to specify the number of independent s_alpha values used.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The analytically derived κ0–κ2 and c0–c2 are self-contained, but κ3, c3, ceven/odd3, and the R(λ) coefficients are obtained by fitting the same numerical data to assumed polynomial ansätze and then presented as predictions, so the λ^{-3/2} terms of the final expansions reduce by construction to those fits.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.1.3, Eqs. (4.30)–(4.34), Table 3, Fig. 3]
    "At this point, we can also exploit it to predict higher-order coefficients that we have not computed with analytical methods. In particular, we apply it to estimate κ3, leading us to conjecture the closed-form (4.2d). ... These assumptions lead us to conclude that κ3 must be a degree-two polynomial in I1(sα), namely ... (4.34). The coefficients gi have been determined by fitting the numerical data for κ3 at different values of sα using the function (4.34)."

    κ3 is the very coefficient that the algorithm is claimed to 'predict'. After extracting κ3 from numerical data for 1+Δw via the fit (4.32), the paper fits those extracted κ3 values to the assumed polynomial (4.34). The closed form (4.2d) is therefore the fitted curve, and the agreement shown in Fig. 3 is a reproduction of the fit, not independent confirmation. The asserted constraint that κ3 contains only I0(sα) and I1(sα), with I0/sα dependence fully factorized into κ0, is an unproven ansatz. Moreover, Eq. (A.3) exhibits I2(sα) at g^{-3}, i.e. exactly the λ^{-3/2} order, so excluding I2 requires a cancellation that is assumed rather than demonstrated. The λ^{-3/2} term of the final expansion (4.1) is thus forced by the fitted input rather than derived.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2.2, Eqs. (4.35)–(4.38), (4.52), Table 4, Figs. 4–5]
    "Let us now move on to consider the coefficients ceven3 and codd3, for which no analytic expressions have been derived. As in the case of the coefficient κ3 discussed in Section 4.1.3, ... we find it natural to consider the following ansatz ... The coefficients ceven3,i and codd3,i with i = 0,1,2 have been determined numerically by fitting the values of ceven3 and codd3 obtained for different choices of sα."

    The same fitted-input pattern occurs in the 3-point sector. ceven3 and codd3 are not computed analytically; they are obtained by first fitting S_even/odd data to the ansatz (4.32) multiplied by √λ and then fitting the resulting coefficient values to the factorization ansatz (4.52). The integer entries in (4.36d) and (4.38d) are read off from Table 4, so those expressions are a reparametrization of the numerical data, not independent predictions. The factorization in (4.52), with I0/√sα stripped off and only a quadratic I1 dependence retained, is assumed to be 'natural' rather than derived, and the agreement in Figs. 4–5 is by construction. When substituted into (2.38), this produces the c3 in (4.40d), so the λ^{-3/2} order of (4.39) rests entirely on the fit ansatz.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.16), Table 5, Eq. (5.8)]
    "To determine the coefficients eRi, we follow the same procedure outlined in Section 4.1.3. Specifically, we first evaluate R(λ) for λ = 10000, 15000, 20000,..., 500000. We then fit the numerical data using the ansatz (4.32) multiplied by √λ. The results of this analysis are reported in Table 5, and based on these findings, we conjecture the large λ expansion (5.8)."

    R(λ) is the numerical bottleneck of the integrated correlator. The paper evaluates R numerically, fits those values to the ansatz (4.32)√λ, reads off the coefficients eRi from Table 5, and then announces the expansion (5.8). The coefficients of (5.8) are therefore a compact parametrization of the same numerical data, and the later 'conjecture' is not an independent check. The final strong-coupling result (5.7), which uses (5.8), inherits these fitted coefficients; the parts of W(NL) that depend on R are fit-based rather than derived from the analytic method, even though the exact expression (5.1) itself is not circular.

full rationale

The analytic core of the paper is self-contained: the strong-coupling coefficients κ0, κ1, κ2 for the 2-point loop correlator and c0, c1, c2 for the 3-point loop correlator are obtained from exact planar matrix-model expressions via explicit generating functions and differential operators, with the final numbers emerging from a closed computation that does not assume the target expansion. Similarly, the derivation of W(NL) from the exact expression (5.1) and the analytic evaluation of ⟨W0M(1)⟩(NL)c in Eq. (5.3) are not circular. The circularity score is therefore not maximal. However, the λ^{-3/2} coefficients κ3, c3, ceven3, codd3, and the coefficients of R(λ) are explicitly extracted by fitting numerical data to a chosen polynomial ansatz, and the papers own text confirms that the fit is used to conjecture the closed forms. The subsequently reported expansions are thus partially 'predictions' that are, by construction, the fitted curves. No self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem plays a load-bearing role here, so the circularity is confined to the subset of results that are fit-derived, but those are the only results that go beyond the analytically derived orders. In particular, the paper presents (4.2d), (4.36d), (4.38d), (4.40d), and (5.8) as if they were established, despite the unproven ansatz for the functional dependence on I1(sα) and the possible presence of I2(sα) at the same order. The final expansions (4.1), (4.39), and (5.7) inherit this fit-dependence, making the claimed strong-coupling data at order λ^{-3/2} (and the matched R(λ) coefficients) numerically forced by the fitting procedure.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the established matrix-model and localization framework for the Z_M orbifold and on generating-function technology from prior work, plus one ad hoc structural ansatz used to conjecture the highest-order coefficients. No physical free parameters or new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Planar limit: instanton contributions are neglected and only leading large-N terms are kept.
    Section 2.1, after Eq. (2.9). Standard for localization at large N, but restricts validity to the planar limit.
  • domain assumption Exact large-N expressions for observables in terms of the X-matrix and Wick factorization of P-operators.
    Eqs. (2.20), (2.29), (2.32). Taken from prior work [19,20,44]; the paper builds on these without re-deriving them.
  • domain assumption Strong-coupling expansion of the coefficients w^{(l)}_{n,m} in the form (4.19), with recurrence relations for omega^{(l,i)}_{0,n} in Appendix A.
    These are results from the method of differential equations in [33,42,43,44]; the paper assumes their validity and extends them.
  • ad hoc to paper Structural ansatz that kappa_3 is a quadratic polynomial in I_1(s_alpha) with factorized s_alpha dependence.
    Section 4.1.3, Eq. (4.34). The authors explicitly 'further assume' the factorization to convert numerical fits into a closed-form conjecture for kappa_3; similar ansatze are used for c_3 and R(lambda).
  • domain assumption Numerical discretization of the integral equation using Fejer quadrature converges for chosen L and m.
    Section 3 and validation in Section 4. Standard numerical analysis assumption, checked against weak-coupling expansions but without rigorous error bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analytical and numerical routes to strong coupling in $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLOBKYN2

@misc{pith2026250502525,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analytical and numerical routes to strong coupling in $\mathcalN=2$ SCFTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLOBKYN2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02525}
}
abstract

We consider the $\mathcal{N}=2$ quiver gauge theory arising from a $\mathbb{Z}_M$ orbifold of $\mathcal{N}=4$ Super Yang-Mills theory. Over the years, exploiting supersymmetric localization, exact expressions for several observables have been derived in the planar limit of this theory. In particular, some of these can be expressed as Fredholm determinants of semi-infinite matrices and their strong coupling expansions in inverse powers of the 't Hooft coupling have been calculated analytically to any desired order. On the other hand, there are also observables that cannot be rewritten in such a closed form, therefore extracting information at strong coupling is more complicated and almost no results are known beyond the leading order. In this work we focus on two observables of this type: the correlators of $n$ coincident Wilson loops and the integrated correlators of two Higgs branch operators in the presence of a Wilson line. We introduce an analytic method to evaluate the first terms of their strong coupling expansions. We also outline a numerical algorithm that serves as an independent check of the analytical results and provides predictions in cases where analytical techniques are currently not known.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun

    V. Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys.313 (2012) 71–129, [0712.2824]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Passerini and K

    F. Passerini and K. Zarembo,Wilson Loops in N=2 Super-Yang-Mills from Matrix Model, JHEP 09 (2011) 102, [1106.5763]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    orientifold

    M. Beccaria, G. V. Dunne and A. A. Tseytlin,BPS Wilson loop inN = 2 superconformal SU(N) “orientifold” gauge theory and weak-strong coupling interpolation, JHEP 07 (2021) 085, [2104.12625]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Gerchkovitz, J

    E. Gerchkovitz, J. Gomis, N. Ishtiaque, A. Karasik, Z. Komargodski and S. S. Pufu,Correlation Functions of Coulomb Branch Operators, JHEP 01 (2017) 103, [1602.05971]. – 38 –

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Baggio, V

    M. Baggio, V. Niarchos, K. Papadodimas and G. Vos,Large-N correlation functions inN = 2 superconformal QCD, JHEP 01 (2017) 101, [1610.07612]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Rodriguez-Gomez and J

    D. Rodriguez-Gomez and J. G. Russo,Large N Correlation Functions in Superconformal Field Theories, JHEP 06 (2016) 109, [1604.07416]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Rodriguez-Gomez and J

    D. Rodriguez-Gomez and J. G. Russo,Operator mixing in largeN superconformal field theories on S4 and correlators with Wilson loops, JHEP 12 (2016) 120, [1607.07878]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Billo, F

    M. Billo, F. Fucito, A. Lerda, J. F. Morales, Y. S. Stanev and C. Wen,Two-point correlators in N = 2 gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 926 (2018) 427–466, [1705.02909]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Beccaria, M

    M. Beccaria, M. Billò, F. Galvagno, A. Hasan and A. Lerda,N = 2 Conformal SYM theories at largeN, JHEP 09 (2020) 116, [2007.02840]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Beccaria, M

    M. Beccaria, M. Billò, M. Frau, A. Lerda and A. Pini,Exact results in aN = 2 superconformal gauge theory at strong coupling, JHEP 07 (2021) 185, [2105.15113]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bobev, P.-J

    N. Bobev, P.-J. De Smet and X. Zhang,The planar limit of theN = 2 E-theory: numerical calculations and the largeλ expansion, JHEP 02 (2024) 100, [2207.12843]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A. Pini, D. Rodriguez-Gomez and J. G. Russo,LargeN correlation functionsN = 2 superconformal quivers, JHEP 08 (2017) 066, [1701.02315]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Billo, F

    M. Billo, F. Galvagno, P. Gregori and A. Lerda,Correlators between Wilson loop and chiral operators inN = 2 conformal gauge theories, JHEP 03 (2018) 193, [1802.09813]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Pini and P

    A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Defect correlators in aN = 2 SCFT at strong coupling, JHEP 06 (2023) 050, [2303.08210]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Sysoeva,Wilson loops and its correlators with chiral operators inN = 2, 4 SCFT at largeN, JHEP 03 (2018) 155, [1712.10297]

    E. Sysoeva,Wilson loops and its correlators with chiral operators inN = 2, 4 SCFT at largeN, JHEP 03 (2018) 155, [1712.10297]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    I. P. Ennes, C. Lozano, S. G. Naculich and H. J. Schnitzer,Elliptic models, type IIB orientifolds and the AdS / CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 195–226, [hep-th/0006140]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kachru and E

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein,4-D conformal theories and strings on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855–4858, [hep-th/9802183]

    1998 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gukov,Comments on N=2 AdS orbifolds, Phys

    S. Gukov,Comments on N=2 AdS orbifolds, Phys. Lett. B439 (1998) 23–28, [hep-th/9806180]

    1998 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, F. Galvagno, A. Lerda and A. Pini,Strong-coupling results forN = 2 superconformal quivers and holography, JHEP 10 (2021) 161, [2109.00559]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Localization vs holography in 4dN = 2 quiver theories, JHEP 10 (2022) 020, [2207.08846]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Mitev and E

    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni,Exact effective couplings of four dimensional gauge theories withN = 2 supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 125034, [1406.3629]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mitev and E

    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni,Exact Bremsstrahlung and Effective Couplings, JHEP 06 (2016) 078, [1511.02217]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Galvagno and M

    F. Galvagno and M. Preti,Chiral correlators inN = 2 superconformal quivers, JHEP 05 (2021) 201, [2012.15792]. – 39 –

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Billò, M

    M. Billò, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Structure Constants in N=2 Superconformal Quiver Theories at Strong Coupling and Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 031602, [2206.13582]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Beccaria, G

    M. Beccaria, G. P. Korchemsky and A. A. Tseytlin,Strong coupling expansion inN = 2 superconformal theories and the Bessel kernel, JHEP 09 (2022) 226, [2207.11475]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Strong coupling expansions inN = 2 quiver gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2023) 119, [2211.11795]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Rey and T

    S.-J. Rey and T. Suyama,Exact Results and Holography of Wilson Loops in N=2 Superconformal (Quiver) Gauge Theories, JHEP 01 (2011) 136, [1001.0016]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zarembo,Quiver CFT at strong coupling, JHEP 06 (2020) 055, [2003.00993]

    K. Zarembo,Quiver CFT at strong coupling, JHEP 06 (2020) 055, [2003.00993]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Ouyang,Wilson loops in circular quiver SCFTs at strong coupling, JHEP 02 (2021) 178, [2011.03531]

    H. Ouyang,Wilson loops in circular quiver SCFTs at strong coupling, JHEP 02 (2021) 178, [2011.03531]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    B. Fiol, J. Martfnez-Montoya and A. Rios Fukelman,The planar limit ofN = 2 superconformal quiver theories, JHEP 08 (2020) 161, [2006.06379]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Galvagno and M

    F. Galvagno and M. Preti,Wilson loop correlators inN = 2 superconformal quivers, JHEP 11 (2021) 023, [2105.00257]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Preti,Correlators in superconformal quivers made QUICK, 2212.14823

    M. Preti,Correlators in superconformal quivers made QUICK, 2212.14823

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Beccaria, G

    M. Beccaria, G. P. Korchemsky and A. A. Tseytlin,Non-planar corrections in orbifold/orientifoldN = 2 superconformal theories from localization, JHEP 05 (2023) 165, [2303.16305]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Beccaria and G

    M. Beccaria and G. P. Korchemsky,Four-dimensionalN = 2 superconformal long circular quivers, JHEP 04 (2024) 054, [2312.03836]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Sobko,Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys

    E. Sobko,Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 046022

    2025

  28. [36]

    Pini and P

    A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Integrated correlators at strong coupling in an orbifold ofN = 4 SYM, JHEP 06 (2024) 170, [2404.03466]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and G. P. Korchemsky,Tracy-Widom Distribution in Four-Dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 031601, [2403.13050]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and G. P. Korchemsky,Solving four-dimensional superconformal Yang-Mills theories with Tracy-Widom distribution, 2409.17227

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Skrzypek and A

    T. Skrzypek and A. A. Tseytlin,On AdS/CFT duality in the twisted sector of string theory on AdS5× S5/Z2 orbifold background, JHEP 03 (2024) 045, [2312.13850]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. Testa,Correlation functions in four-dimensional superconformal long circular quivers, 2501.17223

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ferrando, S

    G. Ferrando, S. Komatsu, G. Lefundes and D. Serban,Exact Three-Point Functions inN = 2 Superconformal Field Theories: Integrability vs. Localization, 2503.07295

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    A. V. Belitsky and G. P. Korchemsky,Octagon at finite coupling, JHEP 07 (2020) 219, [2003.01121]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. V. Belitsky and G. P. Korchemsky,Crossing bridges with strong Szegő limit theorem, JHEP 04 (2021) 257, [2006.01831]. – 40 –

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Pini and P

    A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Wilson loop correlators at strong coupling inN = 2 quiver gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2023) 003, [2308.03848]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Costin and G

    O. Costin and G. V. Dunne,Physical Resurgent Extrapolation, Phys. Lett. B808 (2020) 135627, [2003.07451]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Costin and G

    O. Costin and G. V. Dunne,Uniformization and Constructive Analytic Continuation of Taylor Series, Commun. Math. Phys.392 (2022) 863–906, [2009.01962]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. S. Pufu, V. A. Rodriguez and Y. Wang,Scattering From(p,q )-Strings in AdS5×S5, 2305.08297

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Billo’, F

    M. Billo’, F. Galvagno, M. Frau and A. Lerda,Integrated correlators with a Wilson line inN = 4 SYM, JHEP 12 (2023) 047, [2308.16575]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    M. R. Douglas and G. W. Moore,D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons, hep-th/9603167

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. M. Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 4859–4862, [hep-th/9803002]

    1998 arXiv

  43. [51]

    G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo,More exact predictions of SUSYM for string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 616 (2001) 34–46, [hep-th/0106015]

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Dempsey, B

    R. Dempsey, B. Offertaler, S. S. Pufu and Y. Wang,Global Symmetry and Integral Constraint on Superconformal Lines in Four Dimensions, 2405.10914

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Billò, M

    M. Billò, M. Frau, F. Galvagno and A. Lerda,A note on integrated correlators with a Wilson line inN = 4 SYM, 2405.10862

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Dorigoni, Z

    D. Dorigoni, Z. Duan, D. R. Pavarini, C. Wen and H. Xie,Electromagnetic duality for line defect correlators inN = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 11 (2024) 084, [2409.12786]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Dorigoni,Note on ’t Hooft-line defect integrated correlators in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys

    D. Dorigoni,Note on ’t Hooft-line defect integrated correlators in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) L121702, [2410.02377]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Pini,Integrated correlators with a Wilson line in aN = 2 quiver gauge theory at strong coupling, JHEP 01 (2025) 195, [2410.17342]

    A. Pini,Integrated correlators with a Wilson line in aN = 2 quiver gauge theory at strong coupling, JHEP 01 (2025) 195, [2410.17342]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    De Lillo, M

    L. De Lillo, M. Frau and A. Pini,Integrated line-defect correlators inSp(N) SCFTs at strong coupling, 2503.04902

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    S. M. Chester,Bootstrapping 4dN = 2 gauge theories: the case of SQCD, JHEP 01 (2023) 107, [2205.12978]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou,Flat-space limit of defect correlators and stringy AdS form factors, JHEP 03 (2025) 182, [2411.04378]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    B. Fiol, J. Martínez-Montoya and A. Rios Fukelman,Wilson loops in terms of color invariants, JHEP 05 (2019) 202, [1812.06890]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. K. Erickson, G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo,Wilson loops in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 155–175, [hep-th/0003055]

    2000 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Waldvogel,Fast construction of the Fejér and Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature rules, BIT Numerical Mathematics 46 (2006) 195–202

    J. Waldvogel,Fast construction of the Fejér and Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature rules, BIT Numerical Mathematics 46 (2006) 195–202

    2006

  55. [63]

    FejerQuadratureWeights

    “FejerQuadratureWeights.” https://resources.wolframcloud.com/FunctionRepository/ resources/FejerQuadratureWeights/. – 41 –

  56. [64]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Three-point functions in aN = 2 superconformal gauge theory and their strong-coupling limit, JHEP 08 (2022) 199, [2202.06990]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Beccaria, G

    M. Beccaria, G. V. Dunne and A. A. Tseytlin,Strong coupling expansion of free energy and BPS Wilson loop inN = 2 superconformal models with fundamental hypermultiplets, JHEP 08 (2021) 102, [2105.14729]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda, A. Pini and P. Vallarino,Integrated correlators in aN = 2 SYM theory with fundamental flavors: a matrix-model perspective, JHEP 11 (2024) 172, [2407.03509]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu and Y. Wang,N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills correlators at strong coupling from string theory and localization, JHEP 12 (2019) 119, [1902.06263]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Billo, M

    M. Billo, M. Frau, A. Lerda and A. Pini,A matrix-model approach to integrated correlators in a N = 2 SYM theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 154, [2311.17178]. – 42 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.