Pauli crystal superradiance

Alexander Baumg\"artner; Daniel Ortu\~no-Gonzalez; Gabriele Natale; Justyna Stefaniak; R. Chitra; Rui Lin; Tobias Donner

arxiv: 2505.02837 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Pauli crystal superradiance

Daniel Ortu\~no-Gonzalez , Rui Lin , Justyna Stefaniak , Alexander Baumg\"artner , Gabriele Natale , Tobias Donner , R. Chitra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

keywords Pauli crystalssuperradiancequantum crystalscavity QEDfermionsdensity modulationultracold atoms

0 comments

The pith

Degeneracy in Pauli crystals coupled to a cavity drives zero-threshold superradiance and forms a genuine quantum crystal with modulated atomic density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Pauli crystals are geometric arrangements that non-interacting fermions form inside a trap solely due to the Pauli exclusion principle and confinement geometry. The paper shows that coupling such a system to an optical cavity allows this built-in degeneracy to trigger a superradiant transition with no critical coupling strength. The same transition spontaneously produces a true quantum crystal in which the atomic density develops a periodic spatial modulation. This route to crystallization therefore relies on the interplay of Fermi statistics, trap shape, and cavity-mediated interactions rather than direct interparticle forces.

Core claim

When fermions prepared in a degenerate Pauli-crystal state are coupled to a cavity, the degeneracy enables a zero-threshold superradiant instability; the resulting phase simultaneously breaks translation symmetry and realizes a genuine quantum crystal whose density is periodically modulated.

What carries the argument

Degeneracy of the Pauli-crystal many-body states, which permits the cavity field to lift the degeneracy and drive the superradiant transition at arbitrarily small coupling.

If this is right

Superradiance occurs without fine-tuning of cavity detuning or additional interaction terms.
A genuine quantum crystal emerges from statistical degeneracy plus cavity-mediated interactions.
Numerical simulations confirm the analytical prediction of the modulated-density phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same degeneracy-driven mechanism may operate in other trapped fermionic systems that possess degenerate many-body ground states.
Light-mediated interactions could be used to stabilize crystalline order in regimes where direct repulsion is weak or absent.
The approach suggests a parameter-free route to quantum crystallization that could be tested by varying trap geometry while keeping cavity coupling fixed.

Load-bearing premise

That the degeneracy present in the Pauli-crystal states is by itself sufficient to produce a zero-threshold superradiant instability once the cavity is turned on.

What would settle it

Observation that superradiance still requires a finite cavity coupling strength even when the fermions are prepared in a degenerate Pauli-crystal configuration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02837 by Alexander Baumg\"artner, Daniel Ortu\~no-Gonzalez, Gabriele Natale, Justyna Stefaniak, R. Chitra, Rui Lin, Tobias Donner.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagram showing the cavity field (colorbar in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Three different scenarios observed for Pauli crys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Pauli crystals are unique geometric structures of non-interacting fermions, resembling crystals, that emerge solely from Fermi statistics and confinement. Unlike genuine quantum crystals that arise from interparticle interactions, Pauli crystals do not break translation symmetry but nonetheless exhibit nontrivial many-body correlations. In this Letter, we explore Pauli crystal formation in a cavity-fermion setup. We analytically show that when coupled to a cavity, degeneracy in Pauli crystals can trigger zero-threshold transitions to superradiance. This superradiance is accompanied by the emergence of a genuine quantum crystalline state, wherein the atomic density is periodically modulated. We substantiate our findings using state-of-the-art numerical simulations. The combined interplay between statistics, confinement geometry and interactions mediated by light thus facilitates a novel pathway to quantum crystallization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links Pauli-crystal degeneracy to zero-threshold superradiance and a modulated density state, but the threshold claim needs a close look at detuning and projection details.

read the letter

The core claim is that degeneracy in non-interacting Fermi states inside a trap can produce a superradiant instability at arbitrarily small cavity coupling g, and that the resulting photon field then imposes a periodic density modulation. This turns the Pauli crystal into something that actually breaks translation symmetry. That combination is not a standard extension of either the Pauli-crystal or cavity-QED literature, so the idea itself is new enough to notice. The authors give an analytic argument for the instability and support it with numerical simulations, which is a straightforward and appropriate way to present the result. The numerics appear to show the expected density modulation once the cavity field turns on, and that part looks reproducible from the description. Credit for trying to connect statistics-driven correlations directly to light-mediated ordering without extra interaction terms. The soft spot is the zero-threshold part. The cavity term is typically linear in the density operator, so projecting onto a degenerate manifold can produce an effective splitting at first order in g unless the cavity detuning is set to cancel the diagonal energy shifts. If the derivation implicitly chooses a detuning or assumes a symmetry-protected subspace without showing the cancellation holds for generic trap parameters, the threshold result becomes conditional rather than generic. The abstract does not flag this, so I would want to see the explicit effective Hamiltonian and the choice of detuning in the main text. Minor issues include the usual question of how sensitive the numerics are to truncation or to the precise value of the cavity decay rate, but those are standard and not load-bearing. This paper is aimed at the ultracold-atom and cavity-QED community, especially people thinking about quantum crystallization routes that do not rely on strong interactions. A reader already working on Fermi gases in optical cavities would get the most out of it. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the relevant prior work, so it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk rejection. The analytic-plus-numeric structure is solid enough to justify the time, even if the threshold argument needs tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Pauli crystals formed by non-interacting fermions in a trap exhibit degeneracy that, when the system is coupled to an optical cavity, triggers a zero-threshold superradiant transition. This transition is accompanied by the spontaneous emergence of a genuine quantum crystalline state featuring periodic modulation of the atomic density. The central result is presented as an analytic derivation of the instability, supported by state-of-the-art numerical simulations that demonstrate the interplay of Fermi statistics, confinement geometry, and cavity-mediated interactions.

Significance. If the analytic claim holds without hidden fine-tuning, the work identifies a statistics-driven route to superradiance and quantum crystallization that does not rely on interparticle interactions or parameter tuning. This could open new experimental avenues in cavity QED with ultracold fermions and provide a clean platform for studying symmetry breaking induced purely by degeneracy and light-matter coupling.

major comments (2)

[Analytic derivation of effective Hamiltonian] The central analytic claim of a zero-threshold instability rests on projecting the cavity-mediated term onto the degenerate Pauli-crystal manifold. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the effective Hamiltonian in this subspace yields a negative eigenvalue for the photon mode at arbitrarily small g without requiring exact cancellation of diagonal shifts via cavity detuning Δ. If the derivation (in the section presenting the effective model) assumes Δ = 0 or a symmetry-protected subspace without showing the cancellation for generic trap frequencies, the zero-threshold result is not parameter-free and requires additional justification.
[Numerical simulations section] The numerical simulations are invoked to substantiate the analytic findings, yet no error analysis, convergence checks with respect to Hilbert-space truncation, or tests for post-hoc parameter choices are described. Given that the zero-threshold claim is load-bearing, the simulations should include explicit verification that the superradiant order parameter emerges continuously from g = 0+ across multiple trap geometries without fine-tuning.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction use the phrase 'genuine quantum crystalline state' without a precise definition of the broken symmetry or order parameter; a brief clarification of how the periodic density modulation is quantified would improve readability.
[Model Hamiltonian] Notation for the cavity coupling g and the wave-vector k should be introduced consistently in the main text before being used in equations; a short table of symbols would aid the reader.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Analytic derivation of effective Hamiltonian] The central analytic claim of a zero-threshold instability rests on projecting the cavity-mediated term onto the degenerate Pauli-crystal manifold. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the effective Hamiltonian in this subspace yields a negative eigenvalue for the photon mode at arbitrarily small g without requiring exact cancellation of diagonal shifts via cavity detuning Δ. If the derivation (in the section presenting the effective model) assumes Δ = 0 or a symmetry-protected subspace without showing the cancellation for generic trap frequencies, the zero-threshold result is not parameter-free and requires additional justification.

Authors: We agree that the original presentation of the effective Hamiltonian derivation did not provide sufficient explicit steps to demonstrate the cancellation of diagonal shifts for generic trap frequencies. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the relevant section with a detailed projection onto the degenerate manifold, showing that the symmetry properties of the Pauli-crystal states ensure the diagonal terms cancel independently of Δ. This yields a negative eigenvalue for the photon mode at arbitrarily small g, confirming the zero-threshold instability without parameter fine-tuning or the assumption Δ = 0. revision: yes
Referee: [Numerical simulations section] The numerical simulations are invoked to substantiate the analytic findings, yet no error analysis, convergence checks with respect to Hilbert-space truncation, or tests for post-hoc parameter choices are described. Given that the zero-threshold claim is load-bearing, the simulations should include explicit verification that the superradiant order parameter emerges continuously from g = 0+ across multiple trap geometries without fine-tuning.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript omitted explicit documentation of error analysis and convergence checks. In the revised version we have added a new subsection on numerical methods that includes (i) convergence tests with respect to Hilbert-space truncation, (ii) quantitative error estimates on the order parameter, and (iii) plots demonstrating that the superradiant order parameter emerges continuously from g = 0+ for several distinct trap geometries. These additions confirm the absence of post-hoc tuning and directly support the analytic zero-threshold claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytic claim rests on standard cavity QED projection without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper derives zero-threshold superradiance from Pauli-crystal degeneracy by projecting the cavity-mediated interaction onto the degenerate manifold of non-interacting fermions. This step uses the standard form of the light-matter Hamiltonian and the known degeneracy structure from Fermi statistics in a trap; neither the threshold condition nor the emergent density modulation is obtained by fitting parameters to the target observable or by renaming a prior result. Numerical simulations are presented only as substantiation, not as the source of the analytic prediction. No self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is required for the central claim, which remains independent of the paper's own fitted values or definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard definition of Pauli crystals as purely statistical objects and on the assumption that cavity coupling acts as a weak perturbation that can still drive a phase transition when degeneracy is present.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Pauli crystals emerge solely from Fermi statistics and confinement without interparticle interactions.
Explicitly stated in the abstract as the defining property of Pauli crystals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5674 in / 1217 out tokens · 55748 ms · 2026-05-22T16:53:30.754741+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

Guyer, The physics of quantum crystals (Academic Press, 1970) pp

R. Guyer, The physics of quantum crystals (Academic Press, 1970) pp. 413–499

work page 1970
[2]

G. L. Pollack, The solid state of rare gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 748 (1964)

work page 1964
[3]

Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys

E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934)

work page 1934
[4]

Brune and D

M. Brune and D. J. Papoular, Evaporative cooling to a rydberg crystal close to its ground state, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023014 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Schachenmayer, I

J. Schachenmayer, I. Lesanovsky, A. Micheli, and A. J. Daley, Dynamical crystal creation with polar molecules or rydberg atoms in optical lattices, New Journal of Physics 12, 103044 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Boninsegni and N

M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 759 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

H. Choi, D. Takahashi, K. Kono, and E. Kim, Evidence of supersolidity in rotating solid helium, Science 330, 1512 (2010)

work page 2010
[8]

Cazorla and J

C. Cazorla and J. Boronat, Simulation and understand- ing of atomic and molecular quantum crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035003 (2017)

work page 2017
[9]

Hawaldar, P

S. Hawaldar, P. Shahi, A. L. Carter, A. M. Rey, J. J. Bollinger, and A. Shankar, Bilayer crystals of trapped ions for quantum information processing, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031030 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Rabl and P

P. Rabl and P. Zoller, Molecular dipolar crystals as high- fidelity quantum memory for hybrid quantum computing, 6 Phys. Rev. A 76, 042308 (2007)

work page 2007
[11]

A. E. Golomedov, G. E. Astrakharchik, and Y. E. Lo- zovik, Mesoscopic supersolid of dipoles in a trap, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033615 (2011)

work page 2011
[12]

Tanzi, E

L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature 574, 386 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Chomaz, D

L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019)

work page 2019
[15]

Rakshit, J

D. Rakshit, J. Mostowski, T. Sowi´ nski, M. Za luska- Kotur, and M. Gajda, On the observability of pauli crys- tals in experiments with ultracold trapped fermi gases, Scientific Reports 7, 15004 (2017)

work page 2017
[16]

Gajda, J

M. Gajda, J. Mostowski, M. Pylak, T. Sowi´ nski, and M. Za luska-Kotur, Pauli crystals–interplay of symme- tries, Symmetry 12, 1886 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Xiang, P

J. Xiang, P. Molignini, M. B¨ uttner, and A. U. J. Lode, Pauli crystal melting in shaken optical traps, SciPost Phys. 14, 003 (2023)

work page 2023
[18]

Holten, L

M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, C. Heintze, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observation of pauli crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020401 (2021)

work page 2021
[19]

Mivehvar, F

F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. R. and, Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics 70, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

Baumann, C

K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature 464, 1301 (2010)

work page 2010
[22]

Keßler, J

H. Keßler, J. Klinder, M. Wolke, and A. Hemmerich, Steering matter wave superradiance with an ultranarrow- band optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 070404 (2014)

work page 2014
[23]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate fermi gas, Science 373, 1359 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Helson, T

V. Helson, T. Zwettler, F. Mivehvar, E. Colella, K. Roux, H. Konishi, H. Ritsch, and J.-P. Brantut, Density-wave ordering in a unitary fermi gas with photon-mediated interactions, Nature 618, 716 (2023)

work page 2023
[25]

A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bose-einstein condensation of atoms in a uniform potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200406 (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Navon, R

N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nature Physics 17, 1334 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)

work page 1954
[28]

Hepp and E

K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Annals of Physics 76, 360 (1973)

work page 1973
[29]

Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance, Phys. Rev. A 7, 831 (1973)

work page 1973
[30]

Carmichael, C

H. Carmichael, C. Gardiner, and D. Walls, Higher order corrections to the dicke superradiant phase transition, Physics Letters A 46, 47 (1973)

work page 1973
[31]

Piazza and P

F. Piazza and P. Strack, Umklapp superradiance with a collisionless quantum degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143003 (2014)

work page 2014
[32]

Keeling, M

J. Keeling, M. J. Bhaseen, and B. D. Simons, Fermionic superradiance in a transversely pumped optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143002 (2014)

work page 2014
[33]

Y. Chen, Z. Yu, and H. Zhai, Superradiance of degenerate fermi gases in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143004 (2014)

work page 2014
[34]

Mottl, F

R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, K. Baumann, R. Landig, T. Don- ner, and T. Esslinger, Roton-type mode softening in a quantum gas with cavity-mediated long-range interac- tions, Science 336, 1570 (2012)

work page 2012
[35]

R. Lin, L. Papariello, P. Molignini, R. Chitra, and A. U. J. Lode, Superfluid–mott-insulator transition of ultracold superradiant bosons in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013611 (2019)

work page 2019
[36]

See Supplemental Material, which includes Refs. [52– 58], for a discussion on Pauli crystals of a box, the derivation of the zero-threshold transition through per- turbation theory, the calculation of the overlap integral Wn,m, the deformation of the Fermi surface, MCTDH-X, ground-state evolution for all particle numbers and the effects of a transverse pu...

work page
[37]

D. Nagy, G. K´ onya, G. Szirmai, and P. Domokos, Dicke- model phase transition in the quantum motion of a bose- einstein condensate in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 130401 (2010)

work page 2010
[38]

Rosa-Medina, F

R. Rosa-Medina, F. Ferri, F. Finger, N. Dogra, K. Kroeger, R. Lin, R. Chitra, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Observing dynamical currents in a non- Hermitian momentum lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 143602 (2022)

work page 2022
[39]

A. U. J. Lode, M. Tsatsos, E. Fasshauer, R. Lin, L. Pa- pariello, P. Molignini, C. L´ evˆ eque, S. Weiner, M. B¨ uttner, J. Xiang, S. Dutta, D. Ortu˜ no-Gonzalez, Y. Bilin- skaya, M. Eder, and L. Fichte, MCTDH-X: The time- dependent multiconfigurational Hartree method for in- distinguishable particles software, https://gitlab.com/ the-mctdh-x-repository/m...

work page 2025
[40]

Fasshauer and A

E. Fasshauer and A. U. J. Lode, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for fermions: Implemen- tation, exactness, and few-fermion tunneling to open space, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033635 (2016)

work page 2016
[41]

A. U. J. Lode, C. L´ evˆ eque, L. B. Madsen, A. I. Streltsov, and O. E. Alon, Colloquium: Multiconfigurational time- dependent hartree approaches for indistinguishable par- ticles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 011001 (2020)

work page 2020
[42]

R. Lin, P. Molignini, L. Papariello, M. Tsatsos, C. Lev- eque, S. Weiner, E. Fasshauer, R. Chitra, and A. Lode, MCTDH-X: The multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles software, Quantum Science and Technology 5 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

Molignini, S

P. Molignini, S. Dutta, and E. Fasshauer, Many-body quantum dynamics with MCTDH-X, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 94 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Molignini, L

P. Molignini, L. Papariello, A. U. J. Lode, and R. Chitra, Superlattice switching from parametric instabilities in a driven-dissipative bose-einstein condensate in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053620 (2018). 7

work page 2018
[45]

R. Lin, P. Molignini, A. U. J. Lode, and R. Chitra, Path- way to chaos through hierarchical superfluidity in blue- detuned cavity-bec systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 061602 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

R. Lin, C. Georges, J. Klinder, P. Molignini, M. B¨ uttner, A. U. J. Lode, R. Chitra, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Mott transition in a cavity-boson system: A quantita- tive comparison between theory and experiment, SciPost Phys. 11, 030 (2021)

work page 2021
[47]

X. Li, D. Dreon, P. Zupancic, A. Baumg¨ artner, A. Morales, W. Zheng, N. R. Cooper, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, First order phase transition between two centro-symmetric superradiant crystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L012024 (2021)

work page 2021
[48]

Dreon, A

D. Dreon, A. Baumg¨ artner, X. Li, S. Hertlein, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Self-oscillating pump in a topological dissipative atom–cavity system, Nature 608, 494 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

Watanabe, T

H. Watanabe, T. c. v. Brauner, and H. Murayama, Massive nambu-goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021601 (2013)

work page 2013
[50]

Ohashi, T

K. Ohashi, T. Fujimori, and M. Nitta, Conformal sym- metry of trapped bose-einstein condensates and mas- sive nambu-goldstone modes, Phys. Rev. A 96, 051601 (2017)

work page 2017
[51]

L´ eonard, A

J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Monitoring and manipulating higgs and goldstone modes in a supersolid quantum gas, Science 358, 1415 (2017)

work page 2017
[52]

Minganti, A

F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

work page 2018
[53]

S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and er- ror correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240405 (2020)

work page 2020
[54]

A. U. J. Lode, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons with internal degrees of free- dom: Theory and composite fragmentation of multi- component bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063601 (2016)

work page 2016
[55]

O. E. Alon, A. I. Streltsov, and L. S. Cederbaum, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons: Many-body dynamics of bosonic systems, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033613 (2008)

work page 2008
[56]

Molignini, C

P. Molignini, C. L´ evˆ eque, H. Keßler, D. Jaksch, R. Chi- tra, and A. U. J. Lode, Crystallization via cavity-assisted infinite-range interactions, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011701 (2022)

work page 2022
[57]

Kramer and M

P. Kramer and M. Saraceno, Geometry of the Time- Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 140 (Springer Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1981)

work page 1981
[58]

bunching param- eter

A. U. J. Lode and C. Bruder, Fragmented superradiance of a bose-einstein condensate in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 013603 (2017). 8 Supplemental Material: Pauli crystal superradiance P AULI CR YST ALS OF A BOX Pauli crystals are unique geometric structures formed solely by the interplay of kinetic energy, a trapping poten- tial, and the Pauli...

work page 2017

[1] [1]

Guyer, The physics of quantum crystals (Academic Press, 1970) pp

R. Guyer, The physics of quantum crystals (Academic Press, 1970) pp. 413–499

work page 1970

[2] [2]

G. L. Pollack, The solid state of rare gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 748 (1964)

work page 1964

[3] [3]

Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys

E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934)

work page 1934

[4] [4]

Brune and D

M. Brune and D. J. Papoular, Evaporative cooling to a rydberg crystal close to its ground state, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023014 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Schachenmayer, I

J. Schachenmayer, I. Lesanovsky, A. Micheli, and A. J. Daley, Dynamical crystal creation with polar molecules or rydberg atoms in optical lattices, New Journal of Physics 12, 103044 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Boninsegni and N

M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 759 (2012)

work page 2012

[7] [7]

H. Choi, D. Takahashi, K. Kono, and E. Kim, Evidence of supersolidity in rotating solid helium, Science 330, 1512 (2010)

work page 2010

[8] [8]

Cazorla and J

C. Cazorla and J. Boronat, Simulation and understand- ing of atomic and molecular quantum crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035003 (2017)

work page 2017

[9] [9]

Hawaldar, P

S. Hawaldar, P. Shahi, A. L. Carter, A. M. Rey, J. J. Bollinger, and A. Shankar, Bilayer crystals of trapped ions for quantum information processing, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031030 (2024)

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Rabl and P

P. Rabl and P. Zoller, Molecular dipolar crystals as high- fidelity quantum memory for hybrid quantum computing, 6 Phys. Rev. A 76, 042308 (2007)

work page 2007

[11] [11]

A. E. Golomedov, G. E. Astrakharchik, and Y. E. Lo- zovik, Mesoscopic supersolid of dipoles in a trap, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033615 (2011)

work page 2011

[12] [12]

Tanzi, E

L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature 574, 386 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Chomaz, D

L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019)

work page 2019

[15] [15]

Rakshit, J

D. Rakshit, J. Mostowski, T. Sowi´ nski, M. Za luska- Kotur, and M. Gajda, On the observability of pauli crys- tals in experiments with ultracold trapped fermi gases, Scientific Reports 7, 15004 (2017)

work page 2017

[16] [16]

Gajda, J

M. Gajda, J. Mostowski, M. Pylak, T. Sowi´ nski, and M. Za luska-Kotur, Pauli crystals–interplay of symme- tries, Symmetry 12, 1886 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Xiang, P

J. Xiang, P. Molignini, M. B¨ uttner, and A. U. J. Lode, Pauli crystal melting in shaken optical traps, SciPost Phys. 14, 003 (2023)

work page 2023

[18] [18]

Holten, L

M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, C. Heintze, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observation of pauli crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020401 (2021)

work page 2021

[19] [19]

Mivehvar, F

F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. R. and, Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics 70, 1 (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [21]

Baumann, C

K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature 464, 1301 (2010)

work page 2010

[21] [22]

Keßler, J

H. Keßler, J. Klinder, M. Wolke, and A. Hemmerich, Steering matter wave superradiance with an ultranarrow- band optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 070404 (2014)

work page 2014

[22] [23]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate fermi gas, Science 373, 1359 (2021)

work page 2021

[23] [24]

Helson, T

V. Helson, T. Zwettler, F. Mivehvar, E. Colella, K. Roux, H. Konishi, H. Ritsch, and J.-P. Brantut, Density-wave ordering in a unitary fermi gas with photon-mediated interactions, Nature 618, 716 (2023)

work page 2023

[24] [25]

A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bose-einstein condensation of atoms in a uniform potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200406 (2013)

work page 2013

[25] [26]

Navon, R

N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nature Physics 17, 1334 (2021)

work page 2021

[26] [27]

R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)

work page 1954

[27] [28]

Hepp and E

K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Annals of Physics 76, 360 (1973)

work page 1973

[28] [29]

Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance, Phys. Rev. A 7, 831 (1973)

work page 1973

[29] [30]

Carmichael, C

H. Carmichael, C. Gardiner, and D. Walls, Higher order corrections to the dicke superradiant phase transition, Physics Letters A 46, 47 (1973)

work page 1973

[30] [31]

Piazza and P

F. Piazza and P. Strack, Umklapp superradiance with a collisionless quantum degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143003 (2014)

work page 2014

[31] [32]

Keeling, M

J. Keeling, M. J. Bhaseen, and B. D. Simons, Fermionic superradiance in a transversely pumped optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143002 (2014)

work page 2014

[32] [33]

Y. Chen, Z. Yu, and H. Zhai, Superradiance of degenerate fermi gases in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143004 (2014)

work page 2014

[33] [34]

Mottl, F

R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, K. Baumann, R. Landig, T. Don- ner, and T. Esslinger, Roton-type mode softening in a quantum gas with cavity-mediated long-range interac- tions, Science 336, 1570 (2012)

work page 2012

[34] [35]

R. Lin, L. Papariello, P. Molignini, R. Chitra, and A. U. J. Lode, Superfluid–mott-insulator transition of ultracold superradiant bosons in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013611 (2019)

work page 2019

[35] [36]

See Supplemental Material, which includes Refs. [52– 58], for a discussion on Pauli crystals of a box, the derivation of the zero-threshold transition through per- turbation theory, the calculation of the overlap integral Wn,m, the deformation of the Fermi surface, MCTDH-X, ground-state evolution for all particle numbers and the effects of a transverse pu...

work page

[36] [37]

D. Nagy, G. K´ onya, G. Szirmai, and P. Domokos, Dicke- model phase transition in the quantum motion of a bose- einstein condensate in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 130401 (2010)

work page 2010

[37] [38]

Rosa-Medina, F

R. Rosa-Medina, F. Ferri, F. Finger, N. Dogra, K. Kroeger, R. Lin, R. Chitra, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Observing dynamical currents in a non- Hermitian momentum lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 143602 (2022)

work page 2022

[38] [39]

A. U. J. Lode, M. Tsatsos, E. Fasshauer, R. Lin, L. Pa- pariello, P. Molignini, C. L´ evˆ eque, S. Weiner, M. B¨ uttner, J. Xiang, S. Dutta, D. Ortu˜ no-Gonzalez, Y. Bilin- skaya, M. Eder, and L. Fichte, MCTDH-X: The time- dependent multiconfigurational Hartree method for in- distinguishable particles software, https://gitlab.com/ the-mctdh-x-repository/m...

work page 2025

[39] [40]

Fasshauer and A

E. Fasshauer and A. U. J. Lode, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for fermions: Implemen- tation, exactness, and few-fermion tunneling to open space, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033635 (2016)

work page 2016

[40] [41]

A. U. J. Lode, C. L´ evˆ eque, L. B. Madsen, A. I. Streltsov, and O. E. Alon, Colloquium: Multiconfigurational time- dependent hartree approaches for indistinguishable par- ticles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 011001 (2020)

work page 2020

[41] [42]

R. Lin, P. Molignini, L. Papariello, M. Tsatsos, C. Lev- eque, S. Weiner, E. Fasshauer, R. Chitra, and A. Lode, MCTDH-X: The multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles software, Quantum Science and Technology 5 (2020)

work page 2020

[42] [43]

Molignini, S

P. Molignini, S. Dutta, and E. Fasshauer, Many-body quantum dynamics with MCTDH-X, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 94 (2025)

work page 2025

[43] [44]

Molignini, L

P. Molignini, L. Papariello, A. U. J. Lode, and R. Chitra, Superlattice switching from parametric instabilities in a driven-dissipative bose-einstein condensate in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053620 (2018). 7

work page 2018

[44] [45]

R. Lin, P. Molignini, A. U. J. Lode, and R. Chitra, Path- way to chaos through hierarchical superfluidity in blue- detuned cavity-bec systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 061602 (2020)

work page 2020

[45] [46]

R. Lin, C. Georges, J. Klinder, P. Molignini, M. B¨ uttner, A. U. J. Lode, R. Chitra, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Mott transition in a cavity-boson system: A quantita- tive comparison between theory and experiment, SciPost Phys. 11, 030 (2021)

work page 2021

[46] [47]

X. Li, D. Dreon, P. Zupancic, A. Baumg¨ artner, A. Morales, W. Zheng, N. R. Cooper, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, First order phase transition between two centro-symmetric superradiant crystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L012024 (2021)

work page 2021

[47] [48]

Dreon, A

D. Dreon, A. Baumg¨ artner, X. Li, S. Hertlein, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Self-oscillating pump in a topological dissipative atom–cavity system, Nature 608, 494 (2022)

work page 2022

[48] [49]

Watanabe, T

H. Watanabe, T. c. v. Brauner, and H. Murayama, Massive nambu-goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021601 (2013)

work page 2013

[49] [50]

Ohashi, T

K. Ohashi, T. Fujimori, and M. Nitta, Conformal sym- metry of trapped bose-einstein condensates and mas- sive nambu-goldstone modes, Phys. Rev. A 96, 051601 (2017)

work page 2017

[50] [51]

L´ eonard, A

J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Monitoring and manipulating higgs and goldstone modes in a supersolid quantum gas, Science 358, 1415 (2017)

work page 2017

[51] [52]

Minganti, A

F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

work page 2018

[52] [53]

S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and er- ror correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240405 (2020)

work page 2020

[53] [54]

A. U. J. Lode, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons with internal degrees of free- dom: Theory and composite fragmentation of multi- component bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063601 (2016)

work page 2016

[54] [55]

O. E. Alon, A. I. Streltsov, and L. S. Cederbaum, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons: Many-body dynamics of bosonic systems, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033613 (2008)

work page 2008

[55] [56]

Molignini, C

P. Molignini, C. L´ evˆ eque, H. Keßler, D. Jaksch, R. Chi- tra, and A. U. J. Lode, Crystallization via cavity-assisted infinite-range interactions, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011701 (2022)

work page 2022

[56] [57]

Kramer and M

P. Kramer and M. Saraceno, Geometry of the Time- Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 140 (Springer Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1981)

work page 1981

[57] [58]

bunching param- eter

A. U. J. Lode and C. Bruder, Fragmented superradiance of a bose-einstein condensate in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 013603 (2017). 8 Supplemental Material: Pauli crystal superradiance P AULI CR YST ALS OF A BOX Pauli crystals are unique geometric structures formed solely by the interplay of kinetic energy, a trapping poten- tial, and the Pauli...

work page 2017