Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Atom-by-atom Imaging of Moir\'e Phasons using Electron Ptychography

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By resolving every atom in twisted bilayer WSe2 with electron ptychography, this paper claims direct images of moiré phasons, seen through their localized, anisotropic thermal vibrations.

desk verdict First direct imaging claim for moiré phasons is plausible and deserves referee time, but the quantitative thermal-amplitude maps lean on a single simulation baseline and a 0.8 pm contrast that sits inside the stated systematic error. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03060 v1 pith:ANNIWEDV submitted 2025-05-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yichao Zhang , Ballal Ahammed , Sang Hyun Bae , Chia-Hao Lee , Jeffrey Huang , Mohammad Abir Hossain , Tawfiqur Rakib , Arend van der Zande
show 2 more authors
Elif Ertekin Pinshane Y. Huang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords electronptychographymoiréphasonstwistedbilayerWSe2thermalvibrationsatomicdisplacementparameterssolitonnetworkmoleculardynamicslattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Electron ptychography is a scanning imaging method that reconstructs the sample's electrostatic potential from overlapping diffraction patterns. The paper tries to establish that moiré phasons—the predicted ultrasoft shear modes of the soliton network in twisted bilayers—can be seen directly as atom-by-atom variations in thermal vibration. Using ptychography at sub-15-pm resolution on twisted bilayer WSe2 at 1.7°, 2.45°, and 6.0° twist, the authors fit every W atom with a 2D Gaussian and deconvolve the non-thermal blur with a phonon-free simulation, converting atom widths into per-atom vibrational amplitudes. The maps show enhanced, anisotropic vibration at soliton domain walls and AA-stacked regions, matching molecular dynamics and lattice dynamics, and the paper concludes that phasons dominate room-temperature thermal motion in low-angle moirés. This matters because phasons have been implicated in superlubricity, charge transport, and low-temperature thermal properties, but had not been directly visualized before.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the per-atom 2D anisotropic Gaussian fit to the ptychographic phase image: each atomic column is characterized by long-axis width $\sigma_x$, short-axis width $\sigma_y$, and orientation $\theta$, and the thermal amplitude is isolated by $\sigma_{\mathrm{thermal}} = \sqrt{\sigma_{\mathrm{fit}}^2 - \sigma_{\mathrm{phonon-free}}^2}$ with a phonon-free simulation width $\sigma_{\mathrm{phonon-free}} = 15.5$ pm, rescaled by the Fourier-transform peak position for the twist-angle series. Around this sit molecular-dynamics trajectories converted to per-atom probability density functions, harmonic lattice-dynamics eigenvectors that identify the two near-degenerate phason modes, and multislice ptychography simulations with phonon-free, isotropic-frozen-phonon, and MD-phonon inputs; only the MD-phonon simulation reproduces the experimental spatial pattern. The extended-depth-of-field processing sharpens the projection enough to resolve atom pairs separated by 14.7–19.6 pm.

What would settle it

Repeat the ptychography measurement on the same 1.7° and 2.45° twisted bilayers at low temperature, where the predicted phason motion nearly freezes: if the atom widths do not approach the phonon-free value of about 15.5 pm, or if the AA and soliton excess widths persist, static disorder or reconstruction artifacts are producing the contrast rather than phason vibrations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the size and shape of each atom in a ptychographic image is a time-averaged thermal ellipsoid, so atom-by-atom Gaussian fitting yields a real-space map of vibrational amplitude. In 1.7°-twisted WSe2, the W atoms inside soliton domain walls are elongated parallel to the wall, while AB-region atoms are rounder and randomly oriented. In the 2.45° sample, short-axis amplitudes are largest near AA sites, with experimental means of $\sigma_{\mathrm{AA}} = 6.8 \pm 0.2$ pm, $\sigma_{\mathrm{AB}} = 6.0 \pm 0.2$ pm, and $\sigma_{\mathrm{soliton}} = 5.8 \pm 0.3$ pm, close to molecular-dynamics values of about 5.5–5.6 pm. The lowest-energy harmonic eigenmodes of the relaxed moiré are two nearly degenerate phason modes localized at solitons and AA sites, and ptychography simulations using MD phonon configurations reproduce the measured contrast while isotropic frozen-phonon simulations do not. The paper concludes that phasons dominate thermal vibrations in reconstructed low-angle moirés and that this ptychographic route can image spatially non-uniform vibrations in general.

Load-bearing premise

The whole measurement rests on the assumption that the width of each atom in the image is the microscope's static blur and the atoms' thermal motion added together as independent Gaussian spreads, so any extra width from static disorder, reconstruction defects, or imperfect deconvolution is misread as larger vibration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Moiré phasons move from prediction to observable: their characteristic spatial signatures—localized, anisotropic, soliton-aligned motion and enhanced amplitudes at AA sites—are visible in real space at room temperature.
  • Electron ptychography becomes a general atomically resolved probe of thermal vibrations, able to measure per-atom anisotropic displacement parameters in any material where sub-15-pm resolution can be reached.
  • In low-angle twisted WSe2, thermal motion is dominated by ultrasoft phason modes rather than ordinary acoustic phonons, so models of transport, thermal conductivity, and specific heat in these systems must include them.
  • The measured short-axis amplitudes set quantitative benchmarks that future simulations of moiré phonons should reproduce: roughly 6 pm in AB and soliton regions and 6.8 pm near AA sites for the 2.45° sample.
  • The weakening of regional vibration contrast at 6.0° twist is consistent with the predicted crossover from a reconstructed, phason-dominated moiré to near-rigid bilayer behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to repeat the measurement at cryogenic temperature: the phason contribution should nearly freeze out, and if the AA/soliton excess width persists, static disorder is at least partly responsible.
  • The same atom-by-atom vibration mapping could be applied to moiré heterobilayers and to grain boundaries or interfaces, where soft, anisotropic modes are predicted but have not been spatially resolved.
  • Because ptychography reads vibration from atom shape rather than frequency, it could in principle detect phasons in samples too small or disordered for phonon spectroscopy, including locally heterogeneous moiré lattices.
  • The finding implies that thermal motion in low-angle moirés is spatially inhomogeneous, so effective Debye-Waller factors and local thermal conductivities may need to become position-dependent quantities in moiré device models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports atom-by-atom imaging of moiré phasons in twisted bilayer WSe2 using multislice electron ptychography (MEP). The authors acquire 4D-STEM data on 1.7°, 2.45°, and 6.0° twisted bilayers, reconstruct high-resolution phase images with extended depth of field, and fit 2D anisotropic Gaussians to individual W (and Se) columns to obtain per-atom widths, ellipticities, and orientations. They interpret these as time-averaged thermal vibration ellipsoids and report increased, anisotropic vibrations localized at solitons and near AA-stacked regions, with quantitative amplitude maps obtained by deconvolving a simulation-derived phonon-free width of σ_phonon-free = 15.5 pm (Eq. S4). Lattice-dynamics calculations and molecular dynamics simulations are used to identify low-energy phason modes and to compare predicted versus measured vibration amplitudes as a function of twist angle. The central claims are that phasons dominate thermal vibrations in low-angle twisted bilayers and that ptychography provides a new route to spatially resolved atomic vibration measurements.

Significance. If the quantitative extraction is reliable, the paper would be significant: it would demonstrate direct real-space observation of moiré phasons, a mode class that has so far been inferred only indirectly, and would extend electron ptychography from static structure determination to atomically resolved thermal motion. The raw observations in Fig. 2—anisotropic, soliton-localized atom shapes with preferred orientation along the soliton—are visually compelling and largely independent of the deconvolution model. The paper also contains useful controls, including ptychography simulations with MD phonons versus isotropic frozen phonons (Fig. S8), and a comparison of experimental maps with MD-derived trajectories. However, the quantitative claims about thermal amplitudes and their regional contrast rest on a single global deconvolution baseline and on error bars that are comparable to or larger than the reported AA–AB contrast. The present level of evidence supports the qualitative phenomenology but not the stated quantitative conclusion that phasons dominate the measured thermal vibrations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods (Deconvolution), Eq. S4; Fig. 3D] The quantitative thermal-amplitude maps rely on Eq. S4 with a single global σ_phonon-free = 15.5 pm taken from one phonon-free ptychography simulation. The authors report systematic errors of ±1–2 pm in σ, while the measured AA–AB thermal-amplitude contrast is 0.8 pm (6.8 vs 6.0 pm; this corresponds to roughly 0.3 pm in raw fitted widths because dσ_fit/dσ_thermal ≈ σ_thermal/σ_fit ≈ 0.35). A global scalar baseline cannot remove region-dependent static broadening that differs between AA, soliton, and AB sites—different interlayer column overlaps, local strain, and EDF artifacts would already produce different apparent widths in a phonon-free reconstructed structure. No control establishes that a phonon-free atom is equally wide in all regions, so the reported AA–AB contrast is within the stated calibration uncertainty. The claim that AA regions vibrate more than AB regions is not established at the stated precision.
  2. [Fig. 3D/E and the section “Thermal vibrations across the moiré superlattice”] The validation against MD is not quantitatively consistent with the experimental contrast. The MD values are σ_AB = 5.5 pm, σ_soliton = 5.5 pm, and σ_AA = 5.6 pm—an AA–AB difference of about 0.1 pm—whereas the experiment yields 6.0, 5.8, and 6.8 pm, an order of magnitude larger. Describing this as “remarkable agreement” is not supported by these numbers. Either the deconvolution is amplifying the regional contrast or the MD model is missing the dominant mechanism; in either case, the comparison cannot by itself validate the claim that the experimental amplitudes are dominated by phasons. A mode-resolved decomposition of the MD trajectories (phason modes versus ordinary phonons) is needed to support the attribution to phasons.
  3. [Fig. 3A, Fig. 3D, and the section “Thermal vibrations across the moiré superlattice”] The AA-region statistics are obtained from regions that, as the text acknowledges, “approach AA stacking but do not reach the AA centers.” Because the central signature is enhanced vibration at AA sites, the histograms and mean values labeled “AA” should either be restricted to well-characterized AA centers with a clearly defined selection criterion, or the claim should be reworded as a near-AA effect. As presented, the assignment of atoms to the AA category is ambiguous and weakens the central contrast claim.
  4. [Methods (Deconvolution), Eq. S5; Fig. 4] For the twist-angle comparison in Fig. 4, σ_phonon-free is scaled linearly by the ratio of the furthest identifiable FFT peak positions (Eq. S5). This assumes that the non-thermal baseline is exactly proportional to information transfer and that no other acquisition- or reconstruction-dependent blur contributes. Neither assumption is tested. Because the twist-angle trend in Fig. 4 is a central part of the phason-evolution narrative, the scaling must be validated—for example, by applying the same procedure to simulated data with controlled resolution degradation—or the twist-angle conclusions should be restricted to the qualitative trend visible in the raw maps.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Materials and Methods, Deconvolution] The equation is printed as “Eqn. SEqn. S4”; it should read “Eq. S4.”
  2. [Fig. 4 caption and main text] The main text refers to “experiment (Fig. 4D–E) and MD (Fig. 4F–G)”, while the caption defines panels D–F as experimental and G–I as MD. The panel references should be corrected for consistency.
  3. [Fig. 4 and Materials and Methods] The quantity σ_ave used in Fig. 4 is not defined. Specify whether it is the geometric mean of the long- and short-axis Gaussian widths before deconvolution or of the deconvolved thermal amplitudes, and give the exact formula.
  4. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] Fig. 2 presents raw long-axis Gaussian widths without deconvolution, while Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 use deconvolved thermal amplitudes. State clearly in each caption which quantity is plotted, so that the qualitative anisotropy evidence and the quantitative amplitude analysis are not conflated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental imaging and the deconvolution calibration are independent of the phason prediction, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central experimental claim—increased anisotropic Gaussian widths at solitons and AA sites—is derived directly from atom-by-atom 2D Gaussian fits to ptychographic phase images (Eqs. S1–S3). The conversion to thermal amplitudes (Eq. S4) subtracts a constant phonon-free simulation baseline (σ_phonon-free = 15.5 pm, Fig. S7); this is an external calibration of the atomic-potential and reconstruction blur, not a parameter fitted to the experimental widths. Because Eq. S4 is monotonic, the reported AA–AB contrast in σ_thermal corresponds one-to-one to a raw contrast in the fitted widths, so the spatial pattern is an independent observation. The MD simulations and lattice dynamics provide an independent theoretical prediction of phason localization, and the MD-phonon versus isotropic-phonon ptychography simulations test the reconstruction pipeline against known inputs; comparing those simulations to experiment is a validation strategy, not a derivation of the result from itself. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. 28 for moiré disorder) are contextual and not load-bearing. Possible systematic errors in the single-baseline deconvolution are a correctness and robustness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; phasons are pre-existing theoretical objects. The central quantitative claim rests on one simulation-derived calibration parameter (sigma_phonon_free), the validity of the empirical interlayer potential, and the assumption that static disorder does not contribute to the measured atom widths. These are the most fragile inputs to the amplitude extraction.

free parameters (1)
  • sigma_phonon_free = 15.5 pm
    Width of the phonon-free simulated ptychographic atom profile used in Eq. S4 to deconvolve thermal amplitudes; scaled by the ratio of FFT peak positions in Eq. S5 for Fig. 4. It sets the absolute scale of all reported thermal vibration amplitudes.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ptychographic phase image is proportional to the projected electrostatic potential, and atoms can be represented as 2D Gaussian peaks.
    Used throughout the Gaussian-fitting procedure (Eqs. S1-S3) and in the interpretation of atom profiles.
  • domain assumption Thermal motion blurs the atom image as a Gaussian and the total measured width combines in quadrature with the phonon-free width.
    Eq. S4 assumes sigma_thermal = sqrt(sigma_fit^2 - sigma_phonon-free^2); this convolution model is load-bearing for all quantitative amplitude values.
  • domain assumption The empirical Stillinger-Weber and Kolmogorov-Crespi potentials from Naik et al. accurately describe intralayer and interlayer forces in twisted WSe2.
    Lattice dynamics and MD simulations (Fig. 2F, Fig. 3B/E, Fig. 4G-I) rely on these potentials; the phason eigenmodes and probability density shapes derive from them.
  • domain assumption Static disorder, local strains, and imaging artifacts do not contribute measurably to the atom-size differences attributed to thermal vibrations.
    The deconvolution only removes the phonon-free width and does not model static displacement disorder; the isotropic-phonon control tests imaging artifacts but not static disorder.
  • domain assumption MD trajectories at 300 K, with the applied center-of-mass tether, sample the equilibrium thermal distribution and capture the relevant low-frequency modes.
    The 3 ns MD run is used to generate probability density functions and phonon configurations; this assumes adequate sampling of ultrasoft phason modes over about 30 periods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atom-by-atom Imaging of Moir\'e Phasons using Electron Ptychography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ANNIWEDV

@misc{pith2026250503060,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atom-by-atom Imaging of Moir\'e Phasons using Electron Ptychography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ANNIWEDV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03060}
}
read the original abstract

Twisted 2D materials exhibit unique vibrational modes called moir\'e phonons, which arise from the moir\'e superlattice. Here, we demonstrate atom-by-atom imaging of phasons, an ultrasoft class of moir\'e phonons in twisted bilayer WSe2. Using ultrahigh-resolution (<15 pm) electron ptychography, we image the size and shape of each atom to extract time-averaged vibrational amplitudes as a function of twist angle and position. We observe several signature properties of moir\'e phasons, such as increased vibrational amplitudes at solitons and AA-stacked regions. By correlating experiments with molecular dynamics simulations and lattice dynamics calculations, we show phasons dominate the thermal vibrations in low-angle twisted bilayers. These results represent a powerful route to image thermal vibrations at atomic resolution, unlocking experimental studies of a thus-far hidden branch of moir\'e phonon physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Raman scattering from moir\'e phonons

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A theoretical framework predicts that Raman scattering can detect zone-folded moiré phonons in twisted bilayer graphene as a series of low-frequency peaks with angle-dependent intensities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lin, Q.-H

    M.-L. Lin, Q.-H. Tan, J.-B. Wu, X.-S. Chen, J.-H. Wang, Y.-H. Pan, X. Zhang, X. Cong, J. Zhang, W. Ji, P.-A. Hu, K.-H. Liu, P.-H. Tan, Moiré Phonons in Twisted Bilayer MoS2. ACS Nano 12, 8770–8780 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    N. Suri, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, D. Xiao, Chiral Phonons in Moiré Superlattices. Nano Lett, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03692 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03692 2021

  3. [3]

    Koshino, Y.-W

    M. Koshino, Y.-W. Son, Moiré phonons in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys Rev B 100, 75416 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ochoa, Moiré-pattern fluctuations and electron-phason coupling in twisted bilayer graphene

    H. Ochoa, Moiré-pattern fluctuations and electron-phason coupling in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys Rev B 100, 155426 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Maity, M

    I. Maity, M. H. Naik, P. K. Maiti, H. R. Krishnamurthy, M. Jain, Phonons in twisted transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers: Ultrasoft phasons and a transition from a superlubric to a pinned phase. Phys Rev Res 2, 013335 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Mandal, N

    M. Mandal, N. Maity, P. K. Barman, A. Srivastava, A. K. Singh, P. K. Nayak, K. Sethupathi, Probing angle-dependent thermal conductivity in twisted bilayer MoSe

    work page

  7. [7]

    Phys Rev B 108, 115439 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    C. Jin, E. C. Regan, A. Yan, M. Iqbal Bakti Utama, D. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Qin, S. Yang, Z. Zheng, S. Shi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, F. Wang, Observation of moiré excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices. Nature 567, 76–80 (2019). 12

    work page 2019

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    K. Tran, G. Moody, F. Wu, X. Lu, J. Choi, K. Kim, A. Rai, D. A. Sanchez, J. Quan, A. Singh, J. Embley, A. Zepeda, M. Campbell, T. Autry, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. Lu, S. K. Banerjee, K. L. Silverman, S. Kim, E. Tutuc, L. Yang, A. H. MacDonald, X. Li, Evidence for moiré exc...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Rossi, J

    A. Rossi, J. Zipfel, I. Maity, M. Lorenzon, M. Dandu, E. Barré, L. Francaviglia, E. C. Regan, Z. Zhang, J. H. Nie, E. S. Barnard, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Rotenberg, F. Wang, J. Lischner, A. Raja, A. Weber-Bargioni, Anomalous Interlayer Exciton Diffusion in WS 2/WSe2 Moir...

    2024

  3. [11]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, J. Shan, Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of moiré superlattices. Nature 587, 214–218 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Huang, T

    X. Huang, T. Wang, S. Miao, C. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Lian, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Okamoto, D. Xiao, S.-F. Shi, Y.-T. Cui, Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of the WS 2/WSe2 moiré lattice. Nat Phys 17, 715–719 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moiré flat bands. Nat Phys 16, 725–733 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe

  7. [15]

    Nature 637, 833–838 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43– 50 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    F. Wu, A. H. MacDonald, I. Martin, Theory of Phonon-Mediated Superconductivity in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys Rev Lett 121, 257001 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    B. Lian, Z. Wang, B. A. Bernevig, Twisted Bilayer Graphene: A Phonon-Driven Superconductor. Phys Rev Lett 122, 257002 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    X. Liu, R. Peng, Z. Sun, J. Liu, Moiré Phonons in Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Nano Lett 22, 7791–7797 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Li, J.-M

    Z. Li, J.-M. Lai, J. Zhang, Review of phonons in moiré superlattices. Journal of Semiconductors 44, 011902 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    R. M. Fernandes, J. W. F. Venderbos, Nematicity with a twist: Rotational symmetry breaking in a moiré superlattice. Sci Adv 6, eaba8834 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    W. Ren, J. Chen, G. Zhang, Phonon physics in twisted two-dimensional materials. Appl Phys Lett 121, 140501 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    J. Quan, L. Linhart, M.-L. Lin, D. Lee, J. Zhu, C.-Y. Wang, W.-T. Hsu, J. Choi, J. Embley, C. Young, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C.-K. Shih, K. Lai, A. H. MacDonald, P.- H. Tan, F. Libisch, X. Li, Phonon renormalization in reconstructed MoS2 moiré superlattices. Nat Mater 20, 1...

    2021

  16. [24]

    H. Yoo, R. Engelke, S. Carr, S. Fang, K. Zhang, P. Cazeaux, S. H. Sung, R. Hovden, A. W. Tsen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G.-C. Yi, M. Kim, M. Luskin, E. B. Tadmor, E. Kaxiras, P. Kim, Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graph...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Weston, Y

    A. Weston, Y. Zou, V. Enaldiev, A. Summerfield, N. Clark, V. Zólyomi, A. Graham, C. Yelgel, S. Magorrian, M. Zhou, J. Zultak, D. Hopkinson, A. Barinov, T. H. Bointon, A. Kretinin, N. R. Wilson, P. H. Beton, V. I. Fal’ko, S. J. Haigh, R. Gorbachev, Atomic reconstruction in twis...

    2020

  18. [26]

    J. S. Alden, A. W. Tsen, P. Y. Huang, R. Hovden, L. Brown, J. Park, D. A. Muller, P. L. McEuen, Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 11256–11260 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Q. Gao, E. Khalaf, Symmetry origin of lattice vibration modes in twisted multilayer graphene: Phasons versus moiré phonons. Phys Rev B 106, 1–21 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995; https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/70C3D677A9B5BEC4A77CBBD0A8A23E64)

    1995

  21. [29]

    Ochoa, R

    H. Ochoa, R. M. Fernandes, Degradation of Phonons in Disordered Moiré Superlattices. Phys Rev Lett 128, 065901 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Zhang, J.-H

    Y. Zhang, J.-H. Baek, C.-H. Lee, Y. Jung, S. C. Hong, G. Nolan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G.-H. Lee, P. Y. Huang, Atom-by-atom imaging of moiré transformations in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Sci Adv 10, eadk1874 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Halbertal, S

    D. Halbertal, S. Shabani, A. N. Passupathy, D. N. Basov, Extracting the Strain Matrix and Twist Angle from the Moiré Superlattice in van der Waals Heterostructures. ACS Nano 16, 1471–1476 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Benschop, T

    T. Benschop, T. A. de Jong, P. Stepanov, X. Lu, V. Stalman, S. J. van der Molen, D. K. Efetov, M. P. Allan, Measuring local moir\’e lattice heterogeneity of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys Rev Res 3, 13153 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    L. J. McGilly, A. Kerelsky, N. R. Finney, K. Shapovalov, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, Y. Zeng, S. L. Moore, W. Wu, Y. Bai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Stengel, L. Zhou, J. Hone, X. Zhu, D. N. Basov, C. Dean, C. E. Dreyer, A. N. Pasupathy, Visualization of moiré superlattices. Nat...

    2020

  26. [34]

    N. P. Kazmierczak, M. Van Winkle, C. Ophus, K. C. Bustillo, S. Carr, H. G. Brown, J. Ciston, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. K. Bediako, Strain fields in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat Mater 20, 956–963 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Maity, A

    I. Maity, A. A. Mostofi, J. Lischner, Electrons Surf Phason Waves in Moiré Bilayers. Nano Lett 23, 4870–4875 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Samajdar, Y

    R. Samajdar, Y. Teng, M. S. Scheurer, Moiré phonons and impact of electronic symmetry breaking in twisted trilayer graphene. Phys Rev B 106, L201403- (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    J. Z. Lu, Z. Zhu, M. Angeli, D. T. Larson, E. Kaxiras, Low-energy moiré phonons in twisted bilayer van der Waals heterostructures. Phys Rev B 106, 144305 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Birkbeck, J

    J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, A. Inbar, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, L. Glazman, F. Guinea, F. von Oppen, S. Ilani, Measuring phonon dispersion and electron-phason coupling in twisted bilayer graphene with a cryogenic quantum twisting microscope. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13404...

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ochoa, R

    H. Ochoa, R. M. Fernandes, Extended linear-in-T resistivity due to electron-phason scattering in moiré superlattices. Phys Rev B 108, 75168 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, E. Kaxiras, Electronic-structure methods for twisted moiré layers. Nat Rev Mater 5, 748–763 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    F. S. Hage, D. M. Kepaptsoglou, Q. M. Ramasse, L. J. Allen, Phonon Spectroscopy at Atomic Resolution. Phys Rev Lett 122, 16103 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    B. Haas, T. M. Boland, C. Elsässer, A. K. Singh, K. March, J. Barthel, C. T. Koch, P. Rez, Atomic-Resolution Mapping of Localized Phonon Modes at Grain Boundaries. Nano Lett 23, 5975–5980 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Xu, D.-L

    M. Xu, D.-L. Bao, A. Li, M. Gao, D. Meng, A. Li, S. Du, G. Su, S. J. Pennycook, S. T. Pantelides, W. Zhou, Single-atom vibrational spectroscopy with chemical-bonding sensitivity. Nat Mater 22, 612–618 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    O. L. Krivanek, N. Dellby, J. A. Hachtel, J.-C. Idrobo, M. T. Hotz, B. Plotkin-Swing, N. J. Bacon, A. L. Bleloch, G. J. Corbin, M. V Hoffman, C. E. Meyer, T. C. Lovejoy, Progress in ultrahigh energy resolution EELS. Ultramicroscopy 203, 60–67 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Chen, Y. Han, P. Deb, H. Gao, S. Xie, P. Purohit, M. W. Tate, J. Park, S. M. Gruner, V. Elser, D. A. Muller, Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub- ångström resolution. Nature 559, 343–349 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, Y.-T. Shao, M. E. Holtz, M. Odstrčil, M. Guizar-Sicairos, I. Hanke, S. Ganschow, D. G. Schlom, D. A. Muller, Electron ptychography achieves atomic- resolution limits set by lattice vibrations. Science (1979) 372, 826–831 (2021)

    1979

  39. [47]

    H. Yang, I. MacLaren, L. Jones, G. T. Martinez, M. Simson, M. Huth, H. Ryll, H. Soltau, R. Sagawa, Y. Kondo, C. Ophus, P. Ercius, L. Jin, A. Kovács, P. D. Nellist, Electron ptychographic phase imaging of light elements in crystalline materials using Wigner distribution deconvo...

    2017

  40. [48]

    P. Wang, F. Zhang, S. Gao, M. Zhang, A. I. Kirkland, Electron Ptychographic Diffractive Imaging of Boron Atoms in LaB 6 Crystals. Sci Rep 7, 2857 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Z. Chen, M. Odstrcil, Y. Jiang, Y. Han, M.-H. Chiu, L.-J. Li, D. A. Muller, Mixed-state electron ptychography enables sub-angstrom resolution imaging with picometer precision at low dose. Nat Commun 11, 2994 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    H. Sha, Y. Ma, G. Cao, J. Cui, W. Yang, Q. Li, R. Yu, Sub-nanometer-scale mapping of crystal orientation and depth-dependent structure of dislocation cores in SrTiO3. Nat Commun 14, 162 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    H. Sha, J. Cui, J. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. Li, R. Yu, Ptychographic measurements of varying size and shape along zeolite channels. Sci Adv 9, eadf1151 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Z. Dong, E. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Q. Zhang, A. Mayoral, H. Jiang, Y. Ma, Atomic-Level Imaging of Zeolite Local Structures Using Electron Ptychography. J Am Chem Soc 145, 6628–6632 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Zhang, G

    H. Zhang, G. Li, J. Zhang, D. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Liu, P. Guo, Y. Zhu, C. Chen, L. Liu, X. Guo, Y. Han, Three-dimensional inhomogeneity of zeolite structure and composition revealed by electron ptychography. Science (1979) 380, 633–638 (2023). 15

    1979

  46. [54]

    Gladyshev, B

    A. Gladyshev, B. Haas, T. M. Boland, P. Rez, C. T. Koch, Reconstructing Lattice Vibrations of Crystals with Electron Ptychography. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12017 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    A. M. Maiden, M. J. Humphry, J. M. Rodenburg, Ptychographic transmission microscopy in three dimensions using a multi-slice approach. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 29, 1606–1614 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    H. Sha, J. Cui, R. Yu, Deep sub-angstrom resolution imaging by electron ptychography with misorientation correction. Sci Adv 8, eabn2275 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Hovden, H

    R. Hovden, H. L. Xin, D. A. Muller, Extended depth of field for high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis 17, 75–80 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Forster, D

    B. Forster, D. Van De Ville, J. Berent, D. Sage, M. Unser, Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: A new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc Res Tech 65, 33–42 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    I.-C. Tung, A. Krishnamoorthy, S. Sadasivam, H. Zhou, Q. Zhang, K. L. Seyler, G. Clark, E. M. Mannebach, C. Nyby, F. Ernst, D. Zhu, J. M. Glownia, M. E. Kozina, S. Song, S. Nelson, H. Kumazoe, F. Shimojo, R. K. Kalia, P. Vashishta, P. Darancet, T. F. Heinz, A. Nakano, X. Xu, A...

    2019

  52. [60]

    Hummel, A

    W. Hummel, A. Raselli, H.-B. Burgi, Analysis of Atomic Displacement Parameters and Molecular Motion in Crystals. Acta Cryst. B46, 683–692 (1990)

    1990

  53. [61]

    R. F. Loane, P. Xu, J. Silcox, Thermal vibrations in convergent-beam electron diffraction. Acta Crystallographica Section A 47, 267–278 (1991)

    1991

  54. [62]

    Huang, L

    S. Huang, L. Liang, X. Ling, A. A. Puretzky, D. B. Geohegan, B. G. Sumpter, J. Kong, V. Meunier, M. S. Dresselhaus, Low-Frequency Interlayer Raman Modes to Probe Interface of Twisted Bilayer MoS

  55. [63]

    Nano Lett 16, 1435–1444 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    Huang, Y.-H

    Y. Huang, Y.-H. Pan, R. Yang, L.-H. Bao, L. Meng, H.-L. Luo, Y.-Q. Cai, G.-D. Liu, W.- J. Zhao, Z. Zhou, L.-M. Wu, Z.-L. Zhu, M. Huang, L.-W. Liu, L. Liu, P. Cheng, K.-H. Wu, S.-B. Tian, C.-Z. Gu, Y.-G. Shi, Y.-F. Guo, Z. G. Cheng, J.-P. Hu, L. Zhao, G.-H. Yang, E. Sutter, P. ...

    2020

  57. [65]

    M. Heyl, D. Burmeister, T. Schultz, S. Pallasch, G. Ligorio, N. Koch, E. J. W. List- Kratochvil, Thermally Activated Gold-Mediated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Exfoliation and a Unique Gold-Mediated Transfer. physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 14, 2000408 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    K. Kim, M. Yankowitz, B. Fallahazad, S. Kang, H. C. P. Movva, S. Huang, S. Larentis, C. M. Corbet, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. K. Banerjee, B. J. LeRoy, E. Tutuc, van der Waals Heterostructures with High Accuracy Rotational Alignment. Nano Lett 16, 1989– 1995 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    Wakonig, H.-C

    K. Wakonig, H.-C. Stadler, M. Odstrčil, E. H. R. Tsai, A. Diaz, M. Holler, I. Usov, J. Raabe, A. Menzel, M. Guizar-Sicairos, PtychoShelves, a versatile high-level framework 16 for high-performance analysis of ptychographic data. J Appl Crystallogr 53, 574–586 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Odstrčil, A

    M. Odstrčil, A. Menzel, M. Guizar-Sicairos, Iterative least-squares solver for generalized maximum-likelihood ptychography. Opt Express 26, 3108–3123 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    Thibault, A

    P. Thibault, A. Menzel, Reconstructing state mixtures from diffraction measurements. Nature 494, 68–71 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Odstrčil, P

    M. Odstrčil, P. Baksh, S. A. Boden, R. Card, J. E. Chad, J. G. Frey, W. S. Brocklesby, Ptychographic coherent diffractive imaging with orthogonal probe relaxation. Opt Express 24, 8360–8369 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Aguet, D

    F. Aguet, D. Van De Ville, M. Unser, Model-Based 2.5-D Deconvolution for Extended Depth of Field in Brightfield Microscopy. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17, 1144–1153 (2008)

    2008

  64. [72]

    M. H. Naik, I. Maity, P. K. Maiti, M. Jain, Kolmogorov–Crespi Potential For Multilayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides: Capturing Structural Transformations in Moiré Superlattices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 123, 9770–9778 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr Mater 108, 1–5 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials...

    2022

  67. [75]

    S. C. Harvey, R. K.-Z. Tan, T. E. Cheatham III, The flying ice cube: Velocity rescaling in molecular dynamics leads to violation of energy equipartition. J Comput Chem 19, 726– 740 (1998)

    1998

  68. [76]

    De Backer, K

    A. De Backer, K. H. W. van den Bos, W. Van den Broek, J. Sijbers, S. Van Aert, StatSTEM: An efficient approach for accurate and precise model-based quantification of atomic resolution electron microscopy images. Ultramicroscopy 171, 104–116 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Rangel DaCosta, H

    L. Rangel DaCosta, H. G. Brown, P. M. Pelz, A. Rakowski, N. Barber, P. O’Donovan, P. McBean, L. Jones, J. Ciston, M. C. Scott, C. Ophus, Prismatic 2.0 – Simulation software for scanning and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (STEM and HRTEM). Micron 151, 103141 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Pryor, C

    A. Pryor, C. Ophus, J. Miao, A streaming multi-GPU implementation of image simulation algorithms for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Adv Struct Chem Imaging 3, 15 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    Ophus, A fast image simulation algorithm for scanning transmission electron microscopy

    C. Ophus, A fast image simulation algorithm for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Adv Struct Chem Imaging 3, 13 (2017). 17 Acknowledgments: Electron microscopy work was carried out in the Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities at the University of I...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.