Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Eliminating Out-of-Domain Recommendations in LLM-based Recommender Systems: A Unified View

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03336 v2 pith:FMLDY656 submitted 2025-05-06 cs.IR cs.AIcs.SI

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.SI
keywords generationthreeunifiedconstrainedframeworkhallucinationsitemllm-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are often plagued by hallucinations of out-of-domain (OOD) items. To address this, we propose RecLM, a unified framework that bridges the gap between retrieval and generation by instantiating three grounding paradigms under a single architecture: embedding-based retrieval, constrained generation over rewritten item titles, and discrete item-tokenizer generation. Using the same backbone LLM and prompts, we systematically compare these three views on public benchmarks. RecLM strictly eradicates OOD recommendations (OOD@10 = 0) across all variants, and the constrained generation variants RecLM-cgen and RecLM-token achieve overall state-of-the-art accuracy compared to both strong ID-based and LLM-based baselines. Our unified view provides a systematic basis for comparing three distinct paradigms to reduce item hallucinations, offering a practical framework to facilitate the application of LLMs to recommendation tasks. Source code is at https://github.com/microsoft/RecAI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do LLM Recommenders Know When They're Hallucinating? Auditing Confidence Calibration in Catalog Faithfulness

    cs.IR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Verbalized confidence from four zero-shot LLM recommenders is systematically under-confident and cannot separate correct items from catalog hallucinations, so confidence-gated abstention barely reduces hallucination.

Pith tools