Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 86 references

Defect-Bound Excitons in Topological Materials

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a Chern insulator, the wide, topologically protected ring state around a defect lowers the binding energy of the excitons it hosts and reorders their wave functions.

desk verdict A solid model study of defect-bound excitons in a Chern insulator with a genuinely new observation about wave function ordering, but missing numerical details and an unbenchmarked truncation in the BSE ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03343 v2 pith:VOXA2FW4 submitted 2025-05-06 cond-mat.mes-hall

Roni Majlin Skiff , Sivan Refaely-Abramson , Raquel Queiroz , Roni Ilan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 71.35.Cc71.55.-i
keywords defect-boundexcitonsringstatesCherninsulatorBethe-Salpeterequationexcitonbindingenergytopologicalbandmixingsingle-sitedefecttwo-dimensionalscreening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that band topology directly controls how tightly an exciton can bind to a lattice defect. Working in a two-orbital Chern-insulator tight-binding model with a single-site impurity, the authors show that in the topological phase the defect hosts a robust, ring-shaped, spatially wide in-gap state, and that an exciton formed from an electron in that ring and a hole in the valence band is bound less tightly than in the comparable trivial phase. The binding energy tracks the real-space width of the defect state: as the ring broadens, the Coulomb attraction is spread out and the exciton loosens. In addition, the mixed s/p orbital character of the topological bands makes the low-lying exciton wave functions take distinct shapes whose order in the energy ladder swaps under small parameter changes, behavior absent for trivial gaps. A sympathetic reader would care because it makes a single-particle, experimentally accessible property—the spatial profile of a defect state—the controlling knob for two-particle optical properties in topological materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ring state: the robust, in-gap, topologically protected defect state that appears in the Chern phase, whose wave function has zero amplitude on the defect site and a wide ring-shaped profile whose real-space extent is bounded below by the topological obstruction to forming localized Wannier functions. It is produced in the QWZ two-band tight-binding model—a square lattice with s and p orbitals per site and a mass parameter M that switches the Chern number between zero and one—with a local on-site potential V on a single orbital creating the defect. The two-particle physics is computed with the Bethe-Salpeter equation using a logarithmic screened Coulomb potential for two-dimensional insulators, with the exciton ansatz fixing the electron in the defect state and summing hole states over the full valence band. The argument runs: topology fixes the ring state's width, the width sets the Coulomb overlap that determines binding energy, and the ring state's unavoidable projection onto both inverted bands injects conduction-band character into the exciton wave functions.

What would settle it

Run the unrestricted Bethe-Salpeter equation (or exact two-particle diagonalization) for the same QWZ lattice and defect potential, allowing conduction-band excitations: if the binding energy no longer tracks the ring state's width, or if the first three exciton states stop swapping order as M and t change, the central mechanism fails. On the experimental side, measuring a single defect's optical gap while tuning the band mass through the Chern transition should show the predicted binding-energy drop as the ring state forms.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the QWZ tight-binding model, a square-lattice Chern insulator with an on-site impurity potential in one orbital, the paper's central finding is that an exciton whose electron sits in the topological ring state and whose hole ranges over the valence band inherits the ring state's spatial width: as the defect potential is increased and the defect state saturates into its ring-shaped profile, the exciton binding energy drops from a sharp peak and settles around 1.0 eV, below the roughly 1.2 eV binding of the most localized in-gap defect states in the trivial phase. The same single-particle foundation also controls the two-particle wave functions: in the topological phase the first three exciton states are qualitatively distinct in shape, and changing the mass and hopping parameters—even keeping the bandwidth-to-gap ratio fixed—swaps their order in the ladder, an effect the authors attribute to the band inversion that forces the ring state to project onto both orbitals. The authors stress that the conduction band therefore shapes the exciton even though direct valence-to-conduction excitations are omitted from the Bethe-Salpeter basis.

Load-bearing premise

The central calculation assumes the excited electron sits entirely in the single defect state, never mixing with conduction-band states, and this truncation is never checked against a full two-particle calculation; if conduction-band excitations contribute, the reported binding energies and wave-function ordering could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any topological material whose defect gap hosts a ring state, defect-bound excitons should show lower binding energies than in a trivial gapped phase with the same local screening, and the binding energy should move monotonically as the ring state's width is tuned.
  • The optical gap of a single defect is a read-out of the ring state's real-space profile: measurements of the defect-state width (for example, by scanning tunneling microscopy) should predict the exciton binding energy.
  • Exciton wave-function ordering in topological defect systems is a sensitive function of band parameters, so small strain, gate, or twist changes can reshuffle which exciton state is optically dominant.
  • A topological band's bandwidth cannot be made arbitrarily small, so the trend of rising binding energy in flatter bands is cut off by topology—a limit that does not exist in the trivial atomic limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the width-controlled binding mechanism is right, the same reasoning should transfer to other platforms with topological defect states, such as higher-order topological insulators or twisted moiré systems, where tuning the confinement of the defect state would tune the exciton binding energy on demand.
  • The abrupt kink in the binding-energy curve, which coincides with a node appearing in the exciton wave function, resembles a signature of an avoided crossing between exciton states; a full BSE calculation including conduction-band excitations could reveal whether that feature survives or resolves into a genuine level crossing.
  • Because the ring state's width is set by the topological obstruction, systems closer to the topological phase boundary should host wider ring states and therefore systematically weaker defect-bound excitons, a trend that could be mapped across a phase diagram.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies defect-bound excitons in the two-band Qi-Wu-Zhang model on a square lattice with a single-site orbital defect. The authors solve a Bethe-Salpeter equation in the basis of one fixed electron in the in-gap defect state and holes in all valence-band states, using a screened two-dimensional Coulomb potential. They report that in the topological phase the ring-shaped defect state, which is robust and broadens with increasing defect potential, lowers the exciton binding energy compared with localized trivial defect states, and that small parameter changes permute the ordering of the lowest exciton wave functions. The supplementary material provides an alternative binding-energy definition, an example spectrum, and a bandwidth-gap analysis.

Significance. If the central claims survive scrutiny, the paper offers a simple, transparent model in which band topology affects defect-bound excitons through the real-space profile and orbital composition of the single-particle defect state. The work is commendable for using a parameter-free (apart from screening length and defect potential) Bethe-Salpeter calculation that includes all valence-band states, and for checking the main qualitative trend with an alternative binding-energy definition. It also connects to measurable quantities, since ring states and exciton wave functions are in principle accessible. However, the significance is conditional on resolving the truncation and comparison issues described below.

major comments (4)
  1. [II, Eq. (3)] The ansatz (3) fixes the electron in the single defect state and omits configurations with an electron in a conduction-band state. In the topological systems of Table II the conduction-band edge lies only 0.2-0.45 eV above the defect state, while adjacent exciton levels are separated by 0.02-0.04 eV; the Coulomb coupling between the defect-bound and free-exciton manifolds is never estimated. The paper's own mechanism invokes the ring state's projection onto the conduction band, but that projection and the off-diagonal BSE matrix elements are not computed. Please benchmark Eq. (3) against a calculation that includes conduction-band electron-hole pairs, or at a minimum quantify the projection and show that the neglected couplings shift the binding energies by less than the level spacings. The alternative binding-energy definition in the supplement does not address this truncation.
  2. [III A, Figure 2] The headline comparison between topological (Eb about 1.0 eV) and trivial (Eb about 1.2 eV) binding energies is not controlled: the trivial sequence uses M=-2.5, t=1 and defect potentials tuned to produce localized states at various depths, while the topological sequence uses M=-1.5, t=1 and a saturated ring state. These systems differ in single-particle gap, bandwidth, defect potential, and defect-state energy. To support the claim that topology lowers Eb, please either match the relevant single-particle parameters across phases or state explicitly that the conclusion is based on the intra-topological trend (the drop in Eb as the ring state broadens), with the trivial case serving as illustration.
  3. [II, screening potential and numerical implementation] The paper never states the value of r0 (or the 2D polarizability alpha_2D), the system size, or any convergence tests, although absolute binding energies in eV are reported and depend strongly on the screening length. Please provide these parameters for all figures and include a convergence statement. Without them, the numerical results are not reproducible.
  4. [III B, Figure 5] The attribution of the ordering swaps to the mixed orbital character of the bands is not directly demonstrated. No quantitative measure of the ring state's projection onto the two orbitals or bands is reported, and no comparison is made with a model in which this mixing is artificially suppressed. Please provide such a measure or a direct test; otherwise this explanation remains a conjecture rather than a result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The phrase 'Plank's constant' should be 'Planck's constant'.
  2. [III A] The text contains a typo, 'detect state wave function', which should read 'defect state wave function'.
  3. [Table II caption] The caption reads 'topological systems A,B and C'; it should be 'topological systems A, B, and C'.
  4. [II, after Eq. (5)] The approximate form of the screened Coulomb potential is not numbered; assigning an equation number would make it easier to reference.
  5. [II] The statement that all valence-band eigenstates contribute significantly is a strong claim; a sentence quantifying the contribution, such as the weight distribution across the valence band, would be informative.
  6. [Figure 2 caption] The cross-sections in panel (c) and (d) are said to be along the x-axis; because the system has fourfold symmetry, one cut may suffice, but the caption should explicitly state the cut line and the coordinate used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BSE is solved without fitted parameters, and the main self-citation to prior ring-state work is not load-bearing because the defect state is recomputed in this paper.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The single-particle defect Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) is diagonalized directly, and the ring-state input invoked from Ref. [56] is independently reproduced in the paper's own Figure 1, so the self-citation is corroborating rather than load-bearing. The exciton calculation solves the BSE in the truncated subspace of Eq. (3) with no fitted parameters; the binding energies (Eq. 6) are computed from the Coulomb matrix elements, not imposed. The alternative binding-energy definition in the supplement (Eq. 7) gives qualitatively similar results, showing the headline trend is not an artifact of the chosen energy definition. The single-excitation ansatz in Eq. (3) neglects conduction-band electron configurations, and the paper does not quantify the ring state's conduction-band projection; this is a robustness and completeness limitation, but it is not circular because it does not make the output equal to an input by construction. The ordering changes in Sec. III B are numerical BSE results attributed to mixed orbital character; even if that attribution relies partly on the authors' prior ring-state work, the wave-function ordering itself is computed, not imported. No fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness-import, or renaming pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence and properties of ring states from prior work, the truncation of the BSE to valence-to-defect excitations, the Keldysh screening model, and periodic boundary conditions. The main unstated free parameter is the 2D polarizability alpha_2D, which sets the Coulomb interaction scale and is never given a numerical value. The on-site potential V is a control parameter, not a fit. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • 2D polarizability alpha_2D (effective screening length r0 = 2*pi*alpha_2D)
    Sets the strength of the Keldysh screened Coulomb interaction, which directly determines the computed binding energies (about 1.0 to 1.2 eV). No numerical value is given in the paper.
  • On-site defect potential V = varied up to 1000 eV
    Used to tune the defect state energy and, in the topological case, to saturate the ring state. This is a control parameter rather than a fitted constant, but the choice V=1000 eV is arbitrary.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ring states in topological gaps exist and have the properties described in Ref. [56]
    The paper's central setup and interpretation rely on the robustness, width, and mixed orbital character of ring states, taken from the authors' prior work.
  • domain assumption The BSE is truncated to excitations from the valence band to the defect state only; conduction band excitations are neglected
    Equation (3) restricts the hole to the valence band and the electron to the single defect state. The paper argues the conduction band enters via the defect state's mixed orbital projection but does not quantify this.
  • standard math The Keldysh screened Coulomb potential describes the 2D dielectric screening
    A standard approximation for 2D excitons, citing Refs. [68-70]; the potential's screening length is a free parameter.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions eliminate edge state effects
    Used to isolate bulk defect physics; finite-size effects are not checked.
  • domain assumption The QWZ model with two orbitals per site captures the essential topology for studying defect-bound excitons
    The model is a canonical Chern insulator, but its applicability to real materials is not discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Defect-Bound Excitons in Topological Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOXA2FW4

@misc{pith2026250503343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Defect-Bound Excitons in Topological Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOXA2FW4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03343}
}
read the original abstract

Excitons, bound states of electrons and holes, are affected by the properties of the underlying band structure of a material. Defects in lattice systems may trap electronic defect states, to which an electron can be excited to form defect-bound excitons. Here, we examine the effect of band topology on excitons in systems with a single-site defect. We show that in the topological phase, when robust, in-gap, ring-shaped electronic states appear around defects, the excitons' binding energies are lowered as a result of the wide spatial profile of the defect state. In addition, the excitonic wave functions have distinct shapes that change in order with small changes in the model due to the mixed orbital character of the topological bands. Our study therefore sheds new light on the dominant mechanisms that govern the behavior of defect-bound excitons in topological materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03343 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top left: Red lines - energy spectra of trivial systems with M = −2.5 eV ,t = 1 eV and varying on-site potentials in the s orbital, values of the potentials appear above each graph. Blue lines- energy spectra of the perfect crystal with the same M, t parameters. As can be seen, an in-gap state appears due to the added potential around V = 2 eV and merges into the bulk band around V = 3.7 eV .Top right: Intensity of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Binding energy of the first defect-bound exciton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Zoom-in on the kink feature in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Wave functions of the 1st (strongest bound), 2nd, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Wave functions of the 1st (strongest bound), 2nd, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: Red lines- Exciton energy spectrum of a system with M = −1.5 eV ,t = 1 eV and a local poten￾tial V = 1000 eV in the s orbital. Blue lines- the energy difference between the defect energy and all single-particle valence energies, See text for description. Right: f…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Binding energy, calculated using Equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Binding energy of the strongest bound exciton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Semicon- ductor excitons in new light

    SW Koch, M Kira, G Khitrova, and HM Gibbs. Semicon- ductor excitons in new light. Nature materials, 5(7):523– 531, 2006

    2006

  2. [2]

    Excitons in nanoscale systems

    Gregory D Scholes and Garry Rumbles. Excitons in nanoscale systems. Nature materials, 5(9):683–696, 2006

    2006

  3. [3]

    Exciton–photonics: from fundamental science to applications

    Surendra B Anantharaman, Kiyoung Jo, and Deep Jari- wala. Exciton–photonics: from fundamental science to applications. ACS nano , 15(8):12628–12654, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Exciton dynam- ics in semiconductor nanocrystals

    Damon A Wheeler and Jin Z Zhang. Exciton dynam- ics in semiconductor nanocrystals. Advanced Materials, 25(21):2878–2896, 2013. 7

    2013

  5. [5]

    Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors

    Hartmut Haug and Stephan W Koch. Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors . world scientific, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Excitons and emergent quantum phenomena in stacked 2d semiconductors

    Nathan P Wilson, Wang Yao, Jie Shan, and Xiaodong Xu. Excitons and emergent quantum phenomena in stacked 2d semiconductors. Nature, 599(7885):383–392, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transi- tion metal dichalcogenides

    Gang Wang, Alexey Chernikov, Mikhail M Glazov, Tony F Heinz, Xavier Marie, Thierry Amand, and Bernhard Ur- baszek. Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transi- tion metal dichalcogenides. Reviews of Modern Physics , 90(2):021001, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Lay- ered materials as a platform for quantum technologies

    Alejandro R-P Montblanch, Matteo Barbone, Igor Aharonovich, Mete Atat¨ ure, and Andrea C Ferrari. Lay- ered materials as a platform for quantum technologies. Nature Nanotechnology, 18(6):555–571, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors

    Thomas Mueller and Ermin Malic. Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. npj 2D Materials and Applications, 2(1):29, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws

    Alexey Chernikov, Timothy C Berkelbach, Heather M Hill, Albert Rigosi, Yilei Li, Burak Aslan, David R Reichman, Mark S Hybertsen, and Tony F Heinz. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws

  3. [11]

    Ultrafast dynamics in van der waals heterostructures

    Chenhao Jin, Eric Yue Ma, Ouri Karni, Emma C Regan, Feng Wang, and Tony F Heinz. Ultrafast dynamics in van der waals heterostructures. Nature nanotechnology, 13(11):994–1003, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    Interlayer exciton formation, relax- ation, and transport in tmd van der waals heterostructures

    Ying Jiang, Shula Chen, Weihao Zheng, Biyuan Zheng, and Anlian Pan. Interlayer exciton formation, relax- ation, and transport in tmd van der waals heterostructures. Light: Science & Applications , 10(1):72, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Physical review letters , 113(7):076802, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Emerging exciton physics in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers

    Emma C Regan, Danqing Wang, Eunice Y Paik, Yongxin Zeng, Long Zhang, Jihang Zhu, Allan H MacDonald, Hui Deng, and Feng Wang. Emerging exciton physics in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(10):778–795, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Theoretical methods for excitonic physics in 2d materials

    Maur´ ıcio FC Martins Quintela, Jo˜ ao CG Henriques, Luiz GM Ten´ orio, and Nuno MR Peres. Theoretical methods for excitonic physics in 2d materials. physica status solidi (b) , 259(7):2200097, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    The ultrafast onset of exciton formation in 2d semiconductors

    Chiara Trovatello, Florian Katsch, Nicholas J Bo- rys, Malte Selig, Kaiyuan Yao, Rocio Borrego-Varillas, Francesco Scotognella, Ilka Kriegel, Aiming Yan, Alex Zettl, et al. The ultrafast onset of exciton formation in 2d semiconductors. Nature communications, 11(1):5277, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Excitons and carriers in transient absorp- tion and time-resolved arpes spectroscopy: An ab initio approach

    D Sangalli. Excitons and carriers in transient absorp- tion and time-resolved arpes spectroscopy: An ab initio approach. Physical Review Materials , 5(8):083803, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Optical spectrum of mos 2: many-body effects and diversity of exciton states

    Diana Y Qiu, Felipe H Da Jornada, and Steven G Louie. Optical spectrum of mos 2: many-body effects and diversity of exciton states. Physical review letters , 111(21):216805, 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    Theory and ab initio calculation of optically excited states—recent advances in 2d materials

    Kaichen Xie, Xiaosong Li, and Ting Cao. Theory and ab initio calculation of optically excited states—recent advances in 2d materials. Advanced Materials , 33(22):1904306, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Screening and many-body effects in two-dimensional crys- tals: Monolayer mos 2

    Diana Y Qiu, Felipe H Da Jornada, and Steven G Louie. Screening and many-body effects in two-dimensional crys- tals: Monolayer mos 2. Physical Review B , 93(23):235435, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Nonan- alyticity, valley quantum phases, and lightlike exciton dispersion in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: Theory and first-principles calculations

    Diana Y Qiu, Ting Cao, and Steven G Louie. Nonan- alyticity, valley quantum phases, and lightlike exciton dispersion in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: Theory and first-principles calculations. Physical review letters, 115(17):176801, 2015

    2015

  14. [22]

    Signatures of dimensionality and sym- metry in exciton band structure: Consequences for exciton dynamics and transport

    Diana Y Qiu, Galit Cohen, Dana Novichkova, and Sivan Refaely-Abramson. Signatures of dimensionality and sym- metry in exciton band structure: Consequences for exciton dynamics and transport. Nano letters , 21(18):7644–7650, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Excitons in non- linear optical responses: shift current in mos2 and ges monolayers

    JJ Esteve-Paredes, MA Garc´ ıa-Bl´ azquez, AJ Ur´ ıa-´Alvarez, M Camarasa-G´ omez, and JJ Palacios. Excitons in non- linear optical responses: shift current in mos2 and ges monolayers. npj Computational Materials , 11(1):13, 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Excitons and optical absorption on the surface of a strong topological insulator with a magnetic energy gap

    Ion Garate and M Franz. Excitons and optical absorption on the surface of a strong topological insulator with a magnetic energy gap. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 84(4):045403, 2011

    2011

  17. [25]

    Exciton band structure of monolayer mos 2

    Fengcheng Wu, Fanyao Qu, and Allan H MacDonald. Exciton band structure of monolayer mos 2. Physical Review B, 91(7):075310, 2015

    2015

  18. [26]

    Signatures of bloch- band geometry on excitons: nonhydrogenic spectra in transition-metal dichalcogenides

    Ajit Srivastava and Ata¸ c Imamo˘ glu. Signatures of bloch- band geometry on excitons: nonhydrogenic spectra in transition-metal dichalcogenides. Physical review letters , 115(16):166802, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Fingerprints of berry phases in the bulk exciton spectrum of a topological insulator

    Andrew A Allocca, Dmitry K Efimkin, and Victor M Galitski. Fingerprints of berry phases in the bulk exciton spectrum of a topological insulator. Physical Review B , 98(4):045430, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Berry phase modification to the energy spectrum of exci- tons

    Jianhui Zhou, Wen-Yu Shan, Wang Yao, and Di Xiao. Berry phase modification to the energy spectrum of exci- tons. Physical review letters , 115(16):166803, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Interaction-induced crystalline topology of excitons

    Henry Davenport, Johannes Knolle, and Frank Schindler. Interaction-induced crystalline topology of excitons. Phys- ical Review Letters , 133(17):176601, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    and in flat band systems [ 31] also show a connec- tion between the spread of the excitonic wave function

  23. [31]

    Shift and polarization of excitons from quantum geometry

    Carolina Paiva, Tobias Holder, and Roni Ilan. Shift and polarization of excitons from quantum geometry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10300, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Anomalous exciton transport in response to a uniform in-plane electric field

    Swati Chaudhary, Christina Knapp, and Gil Refael. Anomalous exciton transport in response to a uniform in-plane electric field. Physical Review B , 103(16):165119, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Excitonic topology and quantum geometry in organic semiconductors

    Wojciech J Jankowski, Joshua JP Thompson, Bartomeu Monserrat, and Robert-Jan Slager. Excitonic topology and quantum geometry in organic semiconductors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11951, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Flat band excitons and quantum metric

    Xuzhe Ying and Kam Tuen Law. Flat band excitons and quantum metric. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00325 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Unifying optical selection rules for excitons in two dimensions: band topology and winding numbers

    Ting Cao, Meng Wu, and Steven G Louie. Unifying optical selection rules for excitons in two dimensions: band topology and winding numbers. Physical review letters, 120(8):087402, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Quantum geometric exciton drift velocity

    Jinlyu Cao, HA Fertig, and Luis Brey. Quantum geometric exciton drift velocity. Physical Review B , 103(11):115422, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Exciton band topology in sponta- neous quantum anomalous hall insulators: Applications to twisted bilayer graphene

    Yves H Kwan, Yichen Hu, Steven H Simon, and SA Parameswaran. Exciton band topology in sponta- neous quantum anomalous hall insulators: Applications to twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Letters , 126(13):137601, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Topological exciton bands in moir´ e heterojunctions

    Fengcheng Wu, Timothy Lovorn, and Allan H MacDon- ald. Topological exciton bands in moir´ e heterojunctions. Physical review letters , 118(14):147401, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Optically probing tunable band topology in atomic mono- layers

    Gaofeng Xu, Tong Zhou, Benedikt Scharf, and Igor ˇZuti´ c. Optically probing tunable band topology in atomic mono- layers. Physical Review Letters , 125(15):157402, 2020. 8

    2020

  32. [40]

    Optical selection rule of excitons in gapped chiral fermion systems

    Xiaoou Zhang, Wen-Yu Shan, and Di Xiao. Optical selection rule of excitons in gapped chiral fermion systems. Physical review letters , 120(7):077401, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Optical properties of charged defects in monolayer mos2

    Martik Aghajanian, Arash A Mostofi, and Johannes Lis- chner. Optical properties of charged defects in monolayer mos2. Electronic Structure, 5(4):045012, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Optical properties of atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides: observations and puzzles

    Maciej Koperski, Maciej R Molas, Ashish Arora, Karol Nogajewski, Artur O Slobodeniuk, Clement Faugeras, and Marek Potemski. Optical properties of atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides: observations and puzzles. Nanophotonics, 6(6):1289–1308, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Defect-induced modification of low-lying excitons and valley selectivity in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides

    Sivan Refaely-Abramson, Diana Y Qiu, Steven G Louie, and Jeffrey B Neaton. Defect-induced modification of low-lying excitons and valley selectivity in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Physical review letters , 121(16):167402, 2018

    2018

  36. [44]

    Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors

    Yu-Ming He, Genevieve Clark, John R Schaibley, Yu He, Ming-Cheng Chen, Yu-Jia Wei, Xing Ding, Qiang Zhang, Wang Yao, Xiaodong Xu, et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nature nanotechnology, 10(6):497–502, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    The role of chalcogen vacancies for atomic defect emission in mos2

    Elmar Mitterreiter, Bruno Schuler, Ana Micevic, Daniel Hernang´ omez-P´ erez, Katja Barthelmi, Katherine A Cochrane, Jonas Kiemle, Florian Sigger, Julian Klein, Edward Wong, et al. The role of chalcogen vacancies for atomic defect emission in mos2. Nature communications, 12(1)...

    2021

  38. [46]

    Prospects and challenges of quantum emitters in 2d ma- terials

    Shaimaa I Azzam, Kamyar Parto, and Galan Moody. Prospects and challenges of quantum emitters in 2d ma- terials. Applied Physics Letters , 118(24), 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor

    Chitraleema Chakraborty, Laura Kinnischtzke, Ken- neth M Goodfellow, Ryan Beams, and A Nick Vamivakas. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nature nanotechnology, 10(6):507–511, 2015

    2015

  40. [48]

    Single photon emitters in exfoliated wse2 structures

    Maciej Koperski, K Nogajewski, Ashish Arora, V Cherkez, Paul Mallet, J-Y Veuillen, J Marcus, Piotr Kossacki, and M Potemski. Single photon emitters in exfoliated wse2 structures. Nature nanotechnology, 10(6):503–506, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Op- tically active quantum dots in monolayer wse2

    Ajit Srivastava, Meinrad Sidler, Adrien V Allain, Do- minik S Lembke, Andras Kis, and Atac Imamo˘ glu. Op- tically active quantum dots in monolayer wse2. Nature nanotechnology, 10(6):491–496, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Maximally local- ized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands

    Nicola Marzari and David Vanderbilt. Maximally local- ized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands. Physical review B , 56(20):12847, 1997

    1997

  43. [51]

    Single-photon emission from localized excitons in an atom- ically thin semiconductor

    Philipp Tonndorf, Robert Schmidt, Robert Schneider, Johannes Kern, Michele Buscema, Gary A Steele, An- dres Castellanos-Gomez, Herre SJ van der Zant, Stef- fen Michaelis de Vasconcellos, and Rudolf Bratschitsch. Single-photon emission from localized excitons in an atom- ically...

    2015

  44. [52]

    Local- ized intervalley defect excitons as single-photon emitters in wse 2

    Lukas Linhart, Matthias Paur, Valerie Smejkal, Joachim Burgd¨ orfer, Thomas Mueller, and Florian Libisch. Local- ized intervalley defect excitons as single-photon emitters in wse 2. Physical review letters , 123(14):146401, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Fragile topology and wannier obstructions

    Hoi Chun Po, Haruki Watanabe, and Ashvin Vishwanath. Fragile topology and wannier obstructions. Physical review letters, 121(12):126402, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications

    Nicola Marzari, Arash A Mostofi, Jonathan R Yates, Ivo Souza, and David Vanderbilt. Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics, 84(4):1419–1475, 2012

    2012

  47. [55]

    Topological quantum chemistry

    Barry Bradlyn, Luis Elcoro, Jennifer Cano, Maia G Vergniory, Zhijun Wang, Claudia Felser, Mois I Aroyo, and B Andrei Bernevig. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature, 547(7663):298–305, 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    Ring states in topological materials

    Raquel Queiroz, Roni Ilan, Zhida Song, B Andrei Bernevig, and Ady Stern. Ring states in topological materials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03529 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Expo- nential localization of wannier functions in insulators

    Christian Brouder, Gianluca Panati, Matteo Calandra, Christophe Mourougane, and Nicola Marzari. Expo- nential localization of wannier functions in insulators. Physical review letters , 98(4):046402, 2007

    2007

  50. [58]

    Wannier representation of z 2 topological insulators

    Alexey A Soluyanov and David Vanderbilt. Wannier representation of z 2 topological insulators. Physi- cal Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 83(3):035108, 2011

    2011

  51. [59]

    A short course on topological insulators

    J´ anos K Asb´ oth, L´ aszl´ o Oroszl´ any, and Andr´ as P´ alyi. A short course on topological insulators. Lecture notes in physics, 919(1), 2016

    2016

  52. [60]

    Impurity-bound states and green’s function zeros as local signatures of topology

    Robert-Jan Slager, Louk Rademaker, Jan Zaanen, and Leon Balents. Impurity-bound states and green’s function zeros as local signatures of topology. Physical Review B , 92(8):085126, 2015

    2015

  53. [61]

    Topological quantization of the spin hall effect in two- dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors

    Xiao-Liang Qi, Yong-Shi Wu, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological quantization of the spin hall effect in two- dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 74(8):085308, 2006

    2006

  54. [62]

    In the perfect system with open boundary conditions, all energy levels appear non-degenerate. When the pertur- bation is added, the resonance eigenstates’ energies are slightly shifted compared to their values in the perfect sys- tem, while the rest of the energies in the band...

  55. [63]

    Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells

    B Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L Hughes, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells. science, 314(5806):1757– 1761, 2006

    2006

  56. [64]

    Green ’s functions in quantum physics, volume 7

    Eleftherios N Economou. Green ’s functions in quantum physics, volume 7. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

    2006

  57. [65]

    Electron-hole excitations in semiconductors and insulators

    Michael Rohlfing and Steven G Louie. Electron-hole excitations in semiconductors and insulators. Physical review letters, 81(11):2312, 1998

    1998

  58. [66]

    Its energy is not shown in Figure 1 for clarity

    The second discrete energy level in the topological case appears for large values of the potential V at energies approaching its value Edef ect→ V . Its energy is not shown in Figure 1 for clarity. Its shape is localized on the defect site, similar to the trivial case

  59. [67]

    We label the different eigenvalues of the band excluding the defect state by the index k, since they originate from states belonging to different k-values in the Brillouin zone in the periodic crystal, but keeping in mind that in the presence of the defect momentum is no longe...

  60. [68]

    Screened potential of a point charge in a thin film

    Natalia S Rytova. Screened potential of a point charge in a thin film. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00976 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Electron-hole exci- tations and optical spectra from first principles

    Michael Rohlfing and Steven G Louie. Electron-hole exci- tations and optical spectra from first principles. Physical Review B, 62(8):4927, 2000

    2000

  62. [70]

    10 linear response and more: the bethe- salpeter equation

    Lucia Reining. 10 linear response and more: the bethe- salpeter equation. Quantum Materials: Experiments and Theory, 10. 9

  63. [71]

    Since the electronic part of the wave function belongs to the defect state and is represented by a single state, fixing the electron coordinates results in an overall multiplicative factor to the sum over all hole states, and therefore dif- ferent values of the electron coordi...

  64. [72]

    Coulomb interaction in thin semiconduc- tor and semimetal films

    LV Keldysh. Coulomb interaction in thin semiconduc- tor and semimetal films. In SELECTED PAPERS OF LEONID V KELDYSH , pages 155–158. World Scientific, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    Di- electric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Impli- cations for excitonic and impurity states in graphane

    Pierluigi Cudazzo, Ilya V Tokatly, and Angel Rubio. Di- electric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Impli- cations for excitonic and impurity states in graphane. Physical Review B , 84(8):085406, 2011

    2011

  66. [74]

    The parameters used are M =−2.5 eV , t = 1 eV

  67. [75]

    Gi- ant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor

    Miguel M Ugeda, Aaron J Bradley, Su-Fei Shi, Felipe H Da Jornada, Yi Zhang, Diana Y Qiu, Wei Ruan, Sung- Kwan Mo, Zahid Hussain, Zhi-Xun Shen, et al. Gi- ant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nature mate...

    2014

  68. [76]

    We calculated the binding energies of the systems presented in this section following their definition

    We note that Ref.[77] presents an alternative definition to the exciton binding energy, as the difference between the expectation values of the diagonal and the full BSE Hamiltonian. We calculated the binding energies of the systems presented in this section following their de...

  69. [77]

    Reduced absorption due to defect-localized interlayer excitons in transition-metal dichalcogenide–graphene heterostructures

    Daniel Hernang´ omez-P´ erez, Amir Kleiner, and Sivan Refaely-Abramson. Reduced absorption due to defect-localized interlayer excitons in transition-metal dichalcogenide–graphene heterostructures. Nano letters , 23(13):5995–6001, 2023

    2023

  70. [78]

    and the quantum metric, similar to bounds in the single-particle case [50, 51, 54, 55]. Here, we show that in the case of defect-bound excitons, the binding energy is correlated to the width of the defect state wave function, which is directly influenced by the topological obs...

  71. [79]

    The parameters used are M =−1.5 eV , t = 1 eV

  72. [80]

    Origin of the variation of exciton binding energy in semiconductors

    Marc Dvorak, Su-Huai Wei, and Zhigang Wu. Origin of the variation of exciton binding energy in semiconductors. Physical review letters , 110(1):016402, 2013

    2013

  73. [81]

    Maximally localized exciton wannier functions for solids

    Jonah B Haber, Diana Y Qiu, Felipe H da Jornada, and Jeffrey B Neaton. Maximally localized exciton wannier functions for solids. Physical Review B , 108(12):125118, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    An analysis of the binding energy as a function of the ratio between the gap and the bandwidth further supports our findings and can be found in the Supplementary Material

  75. [83]

    Experimental measurement of the intrinsic ex- citonic wave function

    Michael KL Man, Julien Mad´ eo, Chakradhar Sahoo, Kaichen Xie, Marshall Campbell, Vivek Pareek, Arka Kar- makar, E Laine Wong, Abdullah Al-Mahboob, Nicholas S Chan, et al. Experimental measurement of the intrinsic ex- citonic wave function. Science Advances, 7(17):eabg0192, 2021

    2021

  76. [84]

    Direct measurement of key exciton properties: Energy, dynamics, and spatial distri- bution of the wave function

    Shuo Dong, Michele Puppin, Tommaso Pincelli, Samuel Beaulieu, Dominik Christiansen, Hannes H¨ ubener, Christopher W Nicholson, Rui Patrick Xian, Maciej Dendzik, Yunpei Deng, et al. Direct measurement of key exciton properties: Energy, dynamics, and spatial distri- bution of th...

    2021

  77. [85]

    Detecting photoelectrons from spon- taneously formed excitons

    Keisuke Fukutani, Roland Stania, Chang Il Kwon, Jun Sung Kim, Ki Jeong Kong, Jaeyoung Kim, and Han Woong Yeom. Detecting photoelectrons from spon- taneously formed excitons. Nature Physics, 17(9):1024– 1030, 2021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Near- field optical mapping of exciton wave functions in a gaas quantum dot

    K Matsuda, Toshiharu Saiki, S Nomura, M Mihara, Y Aoyagi, S Nair, and Toshihide Takagahara. Near- field optical mapping of exciton wave functions in a gaas quantum dot. Physical review letters , 91(17):177401, 2003. 10 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Alternative definition of the bindi...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.