A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation

J.F. Wu; J.N. Zhang; S.Z. Zhou; T. Hu; Y.B. Wang

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 64 references

A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PAHA claims that splitting supervision by body part into loss re-weighting and classifier guidance makes a single diffusion model beat prior methods on avatar video quality and audio-motion alignment.

desk verdict A genuine method contribution with a plausible alignment mechanism, but the central 'significantly outperforms' claim currently rests on evidence that is still confounded and unreleased. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03603 v5 pith:4JEP5VYF submitted 2025-05-06 cs.CV cs.MM

S.Z. Zhou , Y.B. Wang , J.F. Wu , T. Hu , J.N. Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CVcs.MM

keywords audio-drivenavatargenerationvideodiffusionmodelparts-awarere-weightingclassifierguidanceco-speechgestureaudio-motionalignmentChinesenewsanchordatasetupper-bodyhumananimation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that audio-driven upper-body avatar video generation benefits from treating supervision by body part instead of as a whole-frame task. It introduces PAHA, an end-to-end video diffusion framework, with Parts-Aware Re-weighting (PAR), which redirects training loss toward the hands, face, and body according to pose-keypoint confidence, and Parts Consistency Enhancement (PCE), which trains face and non-face audio-video classifiers whose gradients steer generation at inference. The authors report that PAHA beats existing co-speech gesture generators on video quality, diversity, and audio-motion alignment on two benchmark datasets and in user studies, while avoiding intermediate pose, mesh, or landmark representations. They also build CNAS, described as the first public Chinese news-anchor speech dataset, to validate the method in a Chinese broadcast setting.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a pair of diffusion-based regional audio-video classifiers, one trained on face regions and one on non-face regions, that output a synchronization score and provide gradient directions during sampling. The classifiers are trained with binary cross-entropy to tell real audio-video pairs from negative pairs produced by the already-trained generator, using a masked face/non-face split so each learns its own region's temporal correlation with the audio. Their gradients, masked and scaled by guidance weights, are applied to noised latents either sequentially (SG) or with a differential correction term (DG). PAR is the training-side companion: it converts pose-keypoint confidence scores into a Gaussian-smoothed, region-weighted loss mask so the diffusion model concentrates learning on hands and face.

What would settle it

Retrain only the PCE classifiers with negative samples generated by a different, independently trained generator (or by real videos with time-shifted audio), keep the rest of PAHA fixed, and rerun the evaluation. If the FGD, BAS, and Sync-C gains vanish or reverse, the guidance was exploiting artifacts of the fixed 60k-step generator rather than learning general audio-motion correspondence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single end-to-end diffusion model can simultaneously improve local visual quality and synchronization with speech if supervision is split by body region. During training, PAR builds a spatial loss mask from pose-keypoint confidence scores, drawing weighted circles around reliable hand and face keypoints and a weighted rectangle around the body, then amplifies the diffusion loss in those areas. During inference, PCE supplies gradient guidance from two masked classifiers, one for the face and one for the rest of the body, so that the denoising process is pulled toward audio-consistent motion in each region; a differential variant tries to stop each classifier's guidance from degrading the other region. On the four-talker benchmark and the new Chinese dataset, PAHA-SG and PAHA-DG report better FVD, BAS, Sync-C, FGD, and diversity than the evaluated baselines, with DG favored in quality and user preference.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the face and non-face classifiers, trained partly on videos produced by the same generator they later steer, learn general audio-motion correspondence rather than a way to suppress that generator's characteristic errors, so their guidance improves real alignment for unseen inputs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

End-to-end generation removes dependence on intermediate 2D/3D pose, mesh, landmark, or optical-flow representations, reducing inference cost compared with multi-stage co-speech gesture pipelines.
The ablation results attribute a large share of the visual-quality gain to PAR: removing it raises FVD by about 93 points and lowers diversity by about 11 on the four-talker benchmark.
The two PCE classifiers are complementary: the face classifier carries most of the lip-sync improvement, while the non-face classifier carries most of the gesture improvement (without it, FGD rises about 19.5% and BAS falls about 16.6%).
Guidance strength and guidance duration are tunable: increasing the fraction of guided denoising steps improves alignment metrics but worsens FVD, with 50% of steps giving the reported best balance, and DG trades extra time for better quality than SG.
The CNAS dataset enables validation of co-speech gesture methods on Chinese news-anchor speech, a language and broadcast style not covered by the prior English benchmark.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the PCE guidance mechanism is as general as the paper suggests, the same classifiers should be usable to steer other video-diffusion backbones without retraining the backbone, since they act on noised latents and audio; a direct cross-generator transfer test would check this.
PAR could be extended to finer regions such as eyes, teeth, or individual fingers, and to expression-specific areas; the paper's own limitations section notes that its face/hands/body split is still too coarse for complex expressions and overlapping gestures.
Because CNAS is small (five identities, 1,473 clips), a natural next test is cross-lingual and cross-identity transfer: train on Chinese data and evaluate on English data, and vice versa, to see whether PAHA's gains are language- or speaker-specific.
Since PAR reweighting relies on pose-estimator confidence, its benefit is capped by pose-estimator quality; making the weighting robust to low-confidence or occluded keypoints would be a testable improvement.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper is a real contribution — a unified diffusion backbone for audio-driven upper-body animation, plus a confidence-weighted regional loss and a self-distilled classifier guidance scheme — but the evidence for the central alignment claim is softer than the abstract suggests. I'd send it to reviewers, not desk-reject, but I'd expect another round on the evaluation.

What's genuinely new: UniVDM avoids the ControlNet-style reference encoder by fusing the reference image into the temporal dimension; PAR's confidence-weighted mask is simple and effective; PCE's two regional classifiers with Sequential and Differential guidance is a sensible way to inject alignment gradients at inference. The ablations are informative: removing PAR hurts FVD, the face classifier changes Sync-C, the non-face classifier changes FGD/BAS — the components behave as intended. The CNAS dataset is a useful resource for Chinese co-speech research.

Soft spots, in order. First, the PCE classifiers are trained to distinguish real videos from UniVDM-generated videos, not matched from mismatched audio-video pairs. So the classifier could be rewarding artifact suppression rather than true audio-motion correspondence. The paper claims it learns 'the temporal correlation between spectral energy variations and localized character motion' but gives no sanity check that it responds to actual desynchronization. That is the load-bearing weakness. Second, guidance hyperparameters are chosen by running on the test set (Appendix D), and all metrics are single-run without error bars or significance tests. BAS improves from 0.1227 to 0.1561 and Sync-C from 5.29 to 6.18; those look like real gains, but I cannot tell how robust they are. Third, minor: the CNAS description contradicts itself (1,473 clips total vs per anchor), and the user study is small with instructions that may bias motion evaluation. Fourth, code and dataset are promised but not provided.

None of this sinks the paper. The central mechanism is plausible, the ablations support the design, and the external metrics (BAS, Sync-C, FGD, FVD) are independent of the classifier's training objective. But 'significantly outperforms' is overclaimed until the artifact-vs-alignment confound is addressed. I would ask the authors to test the classifier on deliberately mismatched pairs, report error bars, and pre-specify hyperparameter selection.

Who should read it: people working on co-speech gesture video generation and classifier-guided diffusion. It deserves a serious referee; I would conditionally accept after the above is addressed.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes PAHA, an end-to-end latent diffusion framework for audio-driven upper-body avatar video generation. The backbone, UniVDM, is a 3D-UNet that processes the reference image and noisy video jointly without a separate reference encoder. PAR re-weights the denoising loss spatially using pose-keypoint confidence masks for hands, face, and body. PCE trains two binary classifiers (face and non-face) to distinguish real videos from videos generated by UniVDM, and uses their gradients during inference via Sequential Guidance or Differential Guidance. The paper also introduces CNAS, a Chinese news-anchor co-speech dataset, and reports quantitative results on PATS and CNAS against SDT, ANGIE, MM-Diffusion, and S2G, plus a small user study.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful engineering contribution: it demonstrates that spatially re-weighting a video diffusion loss and guiding inference with regional classifiers can improve local quality and alignment metrics over several published baselines, and CNAS addresses a real gap in non-English co-speech data. Strengths include the unified-backbone design, the explicit regional-reweighting mechanism, comparisons with four baselines on two datasets, and the use of externally defined metrics such as FVD, BAS, FGD, Sync-C, and Div. The central limitation is evidential: the PCE classifier is trained on real-vs-generated labels rather than on audio-video synchronization labels, and the guidance hyperparameters are selected on the same test sets used for the headline numbers. These issues, together with the absence of error bars and significance tests, make the claim of significant outperformance currently under-supported.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 4.1.3, Eq. (7), Appendix B.3.2] The PCE classifiers are trained with binary cross-entropy on positive samples from ground-truth videos and negative samples generated by the same UniVDM checkpoint (60k steps) that they later guide. This supervision does not encode audio-video correspondence: a classifier can minimize Eq. (7) by detecting any perceptual difference between real and generated videos, including local sharpness, temporal smoothness, identity drift, or generator-specific artifacts, without ever learning whether motion is synchronized with audio. The reported BAS and Sync-C gains are therefore confounded as evidence for audio-motion alignment. I ask for a direct test of the classifier's alignment competence, for example evaluation on videos with shifted or replaced audio, reporting classification accuracy or AUC, and a comparison of guidance gradients for matched versus mismatched audio-video pairs. Alternatively, the negative samples should be constructed with mismatched audio rather than with generated videos. Without such evidence, the central claim that PCE enhances audio-video alignment is not established.
[Secs. 5.1, 5.4, Appendix D, Tables 1-3] All quantitative tables report single-run metrics without error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests, and the guidance weights lambda_non-face, lambda_face, and lambda_diff, together with the guidance-time rate, are selected by sweeping values on the PATS and CNAS test sets and choosing the combination achieving optimal performance. Because the same test sets are then used for the headline comparison in Table 1, the reported improvements may be optimistic, and several differences are small in absolute terms, for example FVD 2052.95 for PAHA-SG versus 2048.75 for PAHA-DG. Please add multiple seeds with mean and standard deviation, perform significance tests against the baselines, and select hyperparameters on a validation split or otherwise report the selection protocol explicitly before quoting final test-set numbers.
[Sec. 5.3, Table 4] The user study uses 16 participants on 10 videos and reports only raw preference percentages. The instructions explicitly ask participants to ignore texture and facial expressions during motion evaluations, which can bias the synchrony and overall-quality ratings toward motion-based criteria and away from visual quality. No significance test, confidence interval, or inter-rater agreement is reported. Because the abstract and conclusion rely on the user study as evidence of significant outperformance, please add a statistical analysis, for example binomial or Wilcoxon tests with confidence intervals, and use neutral instructions that do not direct participants to discount specific quality dimensions, or at minimum discuss how the stated instructions affect the scope of the conclusions.
[Sec. 5.1, Table 1] ANGIE is listed as a baseline but has no CNAS results in Table 1, and no explanation is provided. More importantly, the baseline fine-tuning protocol is described only as initialized with official weights and fine-tuned on the PATS and CNAS datasets; the reader cannot tell whether all baselines receive the same amount of training data, the same number of steps, or the same evaluation protocol. Please specify the fine-tuning setup in detail and make the evaluation code and data available, since the abstract promises release upon acceptance but no repository or data-access statement is included in the current manuscript.

minor comments (5)

[Tables 2 and 3] The Div value reported for PAHA-SG at 50% guidance in Table 2 is 99.604, but Tables 1 and 3 report 100.917 for what appears to be the same configuration; please reconcile this discrepancy.
[Eq. (7)] In Eq. (7), the symbol y is described as the final predicted label, which is confusing because the classifier output is the synchronization score s; please rename the ground-truth label to y_true or similar.
[Appendix C] The text says that 1,473 valid clips are obtained, while Appendix C states 1,473 valid clips per news anchor with 5 identity IDs; please clarify whether the count is per identity or the total number of clips in CNAS.
[Sec. 4.3 and Abstract] The paper repeatedly calls CNAS the first public Chinese News Anchor Speech dataset, but no dataset URL or release mechanism is provided in the manuscript; please add a data-availability statement.
[Sec. 5.4, Table 2] The discussion of the guidance-time rate says the best balance occurs from 0% to 50% guided steps and that further increases reduce performance, but FVD actually degrades monotonically while BAS and Sync-C improve; please state the criterion used to define the best balance.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Best-reported guidance weights and guidance-time rate are selected by ablations on the same test sets that produce the headline metrics, making the quoted 'optimal performance' a fitted quantity; the PCE self-distillation loop is a validity confound but not a construction-level circularity.

fitted input called prediction [Section 5.4 (Ablation Study, Guidance Parameters) and Appendix D]
"We determine the guidance strength during inference via ablation experiments. The complete results for the non-face guidance weight λ_non-face, face guidance weight λ_face and differential guidance weight λ_diff are available in Appendix D. The final weight combination is set to (λ_non-face = 1, λ_face = 0.1, λ_diff = 0.25), achieving optimal performance."

The paper reports PAHA's final PATS/CNAS numbers after choosing λ_non-face, λ_face, λ_diff and the guidance-time rate by exhaustive ablation on the same test splits used to produce those numbers. Thus the 'optimal performance' quoted in Sec. 5.4 is, by construction, the maximum over a grid of test-set evaluations; the headline claim that PAHA significantly outperforms baselines is partly a restatement of that selection. The comparison is not fully circular because baselines and external metrics provide independent anchor points, but the reported superiority on alignment and video-quality metrics is statistically forced by the selection procedure rather than being an out-of-sample prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical rather than formal. The main load-bearing module is PCE: classifiers trained to distinguish real videos from videos generated by UniVDM are used to guide UniVDM at inference, and the paper explicitly calls this self-distillation. However, the classifier's training objective (real vs generated) is not identical to the claimed outcome (audio-video alignment), so the alignment claim is not circular by construction; it is a construct-validity concern because the classifier could exploit generator-specific artifacts rather than true audio-video correspondence. The clearest circular element is in evaluation: guidance strengths and the guidance-step proportion are selected by ablating on the same PATS and CNAS test splits that are later reported as headline results, with the chosen configuration described as 'achieving optimal performance.' The reported numbers are therefore the maximum of a test-set search, not an independent prediction. No self-citation chain is load-bearing; references such as Diffusion Self-Distillation and ConvoFusion are external and are not used to forbid alternatives. Because the baselines are evaluated under the same protocol and the metrics (FVD, BAS, FGD, Sync-C) are external, the central comparison retains some independent content, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework depends on several tuned hyperparameters (loss weights, guidance strengths, threshold, radius) and domain assumptions about pose confidence and audio-motion correlation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)

Tau_j (keypoint confidence threshold) = 0.8
Used in PAR to decide which keypoints define awareness areas; chosen by hand (Sec. 4.1.2).
r (circle radius for hand/face masks) = 10
Controls the size of awareness areas around hand and face keypoints; chosen by hand (Sec. 4.1.2).
Omega_1 (hand/face loss weight) = 10
Multiplier for re-weighted loss in hand and face regions; set higher than Omega_2 to emphasize small regions (Sec. 4.1.2).
Omega_2 (body loss weight) = 2
Multiplier for body region loss; chosen lower than Omega_1 (Sec. 4.1.2).
Lambda_non_face (non-face classifier guidance weight) = 1.0
Selected via ablation on the test set (Appendix D, Table 5).
Lambda_face (face classifier guidance weight) = 0.1
Selected via ablation on the test set (Appendix D, Table 6).
Lambda_diff (differential guidance weight) = 0.25
Selected via ablation on the test set (Appendix D, Table 7).
Guidance step rate = 50% (first 15 of 30 steps)
Ablated in Table 2; best balance found at 50% guidance steps.
Mask probability for classifier augmentation = 80%
Probability of masking facial or non-face regions during classifier training; chosen by hand (Sec. 5.1).

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Pretrained video diffusion model [2] provides a suitable initialization for UniVDM.
Sec. B.1 states UniVDM is initialized from a pretrained video diffusion model; the transferability of its features is assumed.
domain assumption Pose keypoint confidence scores from DWpose correlate with local visual quality (less blur, less occlusion).
Sec. 4.1.2 uses these confidences to define awareness areas and loss weights; if confidence does not track quality, re-weighting could amplify noise.
domain assumption Audio spectral energy changes are temporally correlated with localized character motions (lips, hands).
PCE training (Sec. 4.1.3 and Fig. 6) assumes this correlation is learnable by a classifier.
domain assumption Classifier guidance gradients computed on noised latents improve generation alignment without degrading unrelated regions.
Sec. 4.2 applies gradients with masks; DG is introduced because this assumption fails partially for non-guided areas.
domain assumption The evaluation metrics (FVD, BAS, FGD, Sync-C, Div) computed by external feature extractors reflect the claimed quality and alignment.
Metrics rely on pre-trained I3D and pose autoencoders; no statistical significance is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4JEP5VYF

@misc{pith2026250503603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4JEP5VYF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03603}
}

read the original abstract

Audio-driven human animation technology is widely used in human-computer interaction, and the emergence of diffusion models has further advanced its development. Currently, most methods rely on multi-stage generation and intermediate representations, resulting in long inference time and issues with generation quality in specific foreground regions and audio-motion consistency. These shortcomings are primarily due to the lack of localized fine-grained supervised guidance. To address above challenges, we propose Parts-aware Audio-driven Human Animation, PAHA, a unit enhancement and guidance framework for audio-driven upper-body animation. We introduce two key methods: Parts-Aware Re-weighting (PAR) and Parts Consistency Enhancement (PCE). PAR dynamically adjusts regional training loss weights based on pose confidence scores, effectively improving visual quality. PCE constructs and trains diffusion-based regional audio-visual classifiers to improve the consistency of motion and co-speech audio. Afterwards, we design two novel inference guidance methods for the foregoing classifiers, Sequential Guidance (SG) and Differential Guidance (DG), to balance efficiency and quality respectively. Additionally, we build CNAS, the first public Chinese News Anchor Speech dataset, to advance research and validation in this field. Extensive experimental results and user studies demonstrate that PAHA significantly outperforms existing methods in audio-motion alignment and video-related evaluations. The codes and CNAS dataset will be released upon acceptance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03603 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** (a) S2G [10], the state-of-the-art for co-speech gesture generation, suffers from localized poor quality (e.g., hands, face) and audio-motion misalignment. (b) Qualitative ablation study. Parts-Aware Re-weighting (PAR) improves local generation quality of characters, while Parts Consistency Enhancement (PCE) enhances alignment between motion and co-speech audio. Our comprehensive method generates high-quality and co… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Overview of the proposed PAHA that consists of three core components: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Process of our Parts-Aware Re-weighting (PAR) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Structure of our diffusion-based classifier. The pre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Pipeline for constructing negative samples for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The correlation between motions and the corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The inference pipeline of PAHA includes two forms: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

Chaitanya Ahuja, Dong Won Lee, Yukiko I Nakano, and Louis-Philippe Morency

work page
[2]

Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dockhorn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. 2023. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation Paper, 2025, Preprint Conference on Computer Vis...

work page 2023
[3]

Shengqu Cai, Eric Chan, Yunzhi Zhang, Leonidas Guibas, Jiajun Wu, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2024. Diffusion Self-Distillation for Zero-Shot Customized Image Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18616(2024)

arXiv 2024
[4]

Aggelina Chatziagapi, Bindita Chaudhuri, Amit Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Dimitris Samaras, and Nikolaos Sarafianos. 2024. TalkinNeRF: Animatable Neural Fields for Full-Body Talking Humans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16666(2024)

arXiv 2024
[5]

Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. 2024. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7310–7320

2024
[6]

Enric Corona, Andrei Zanfir, Eduard Gabriel Bazavan, Nikos Kolotouros, Thiemo Alldieck, and Cristian Sminchisescu. 2024. VLOGGER: Multimodal diffusion for embodied avatar synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08764(2024)

arXiv 2024
[7]

Shiry Ginosar, Amir Bar, Gefen Kohavi, Caroline Chan, Andrew Owens, and Jitendra Malik. 2019. Learning individual styles of conversational gesture. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3497–3506

2019
[8]

Jianzhu Guo, Dingyun Zhang, Xiaoqiang Liu, Zhizhou Zhong, Yuan Zhang, Pengfei Wan, and Di Zhang. 2024. Liveportrait: Efficient portrait animation with stitching and retargeting control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03168(2024)

arXiv 2024

Show all 64 references

[9]

Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. 2023. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725(2023)

2023 arXiv
[10]

Xu He, Qiaochu Huang, Zhensong Zhang, Zhiwei Lin, Zhiyong Wu, Sicheng Yang, Minglei Li, Zhiyi Chen, Songcen Xu, and Xiaofei Wu. 2024. Co-Speech Gesture Video Generation via Motion-Decoupled Diffusion Model. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patter...

2024
[11]

Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems33 (2020), 6840–6851

2020
[12]

Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. 2022. Video diffusion models.Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems35 (2022), 8633–8646

2022
[13]

Steven Hogue, Chenxu Zhang, Hamza Daruger, Yapeng Tian, and Xiaohu Guo
[14]

Li Hu. 2024. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video syn- thesis for character animation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8153–8163

2024
[15]

Ziyao Huang, Fan Tang, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Juan Cao, Jintao Li, and Tong-Yee Lee. 2024. Make-Your-Anchor: A Diffusion-based 2D Avatar Generation Framework. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6997–7006

2024
[16]

Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, et al. 2017. The kinetics human action video dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950(2017)

2017 arXiv
[17]

Ruilong Li, Shan Yang, David A Ross, and Angjoo Kanazawa. 2021. Learn to Dance with AIST++: Music Conditioned 3D Dance Generation. CoRR abs/2101.08779 (2021).arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.08779(2021)

2021 arXiv
[18]

Shanchuan Lin, Anran Wang, and Xiao Yang. 2024. Sdxl-lightning: Progressive adversarial diffusion distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13929(2024)

2024 arXiv
[19]

Tao Liu, Feilong Chen, Shuai Fan, Chenpeng Du, Qi Chen, Xie Chen, and Kai Yu. 2024. Anitalker: animate vivid and diverse talking faces through identity- decoupled facial motion encoding. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 6696–6705

2024
[20]

Xian Liu, Qianyi Wu, Hang Zhou, Yuanqi Du, Wayne Wu, Dahua Lin, and Ziwei Liu. 2022. Audio-driven co-speech gesture video generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35 (2022), 21386–21399

2022
[21]

Xian Liu, Qianyi Wu, Hang Zhou, Yinghao Xu, Rui Qian, Xinyi Lin, Xiaowei Zhou, Wayne Wu, Bo Dai, and Bolei Zhou. 2022. Learning hierarchical cross-modal association for co-speech gesture generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn...

2022
[22]

I Loshchilov. 2017. Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101(2017)

2017 arXiv
[23]

Camillo Lugaresi, Jiuqiang Tang, Hadon Nash, Chris McClanahan, Esha Uboweja, Michael Hays, Fan Zhang, Chuo-Ling Chang, Ming Guang Yong, Juhyun Lee, et al. 2019. Mediapipe: A framework for building perception pipelines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172(2019)

2019 arXiv
[24]

Aniruddha Mahapatra, Richa Mishra, Renda Li, Ziyi Chen, Boyang Ding, Shoulei Wang, Jun-Yan Zhu, Peng Chang, Mei Han, and Jing Xiao. 2025. Co-speech Gesture Video Generation with 3D Human Meshes. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 172–189

2025
[25]

Muhammad Hamza Mughal, Rishabh Dabral, Ikhsanul Habibie, Lucia Donatelli, Marc Habermann, and Christian Theobalt. 2024. Convofusion: Multi-modal conversational diffusion for co-speech gesture synthesis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Re...

2024
[26]

Fatemeh Nazarieh, Zhenhua Feng, Muhammad Awais, Wenwu Wang, and Josef Kittler. 2024. A Survey of Cross-Modal Visual Content Generation.IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology(2024)

2024
[27]

Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El- Nouby, et al. 2023. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193(2023)

2023 arXiv
[28]

Bohao Peng, Jian Wang, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Ming-Chang Yang, and Jiaya Jia. 2024. Controlnext: Powerful and efficient control for image and video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06070(2024)

2024 arXiv
[29]

Shenhan Qian, Zhi Tu, Yihao Zhi, Wen Liu, and Shenghua Gao. 2021. Speech drives templates: Co-speech gesture synthesis with learned templates. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 11077–11086

2021
[30]

Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. InMICCAI

2015
[31]

Ludan Ruan, Yiyang Ma, Huan Yang, Huiguo He, Bei Liu, Jianlong Fu, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Qin Jin, and Baining Guo. 2023. MM-Diffusion: Learning multi-modal diffusion models for joint audio and video generation. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

2023
[32]

Axel Sauer, Dominik Lorenz, Andreas Blattmann, and Robin Rombach. 2025. Adversarial diffusion distillation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 87–103

2025
[33]

Steffen Schneider, Alexei Baevski, Ronan Collobert, and Michael Auli. 2019. wav2vec: Unsupervised pre-training for speech recognition.arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05862(2019)

2019 arXiv
[34]

Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. 2022. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[35]

Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli
[36]

Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. 2020. Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502(2020)

2020 arXiv
[37]

Linsen Song, Wayne Wu, Chaoyou Fu, Chen Change Loy, and Ran He. 2022. Audio- driven dubbing for user generated contents via style-aware semi-parametric synthesis.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology33, 3 (2022), 1247–1261

2022
[38]

Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. 2024. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Neurocomputing568 (2024), 127063

2024
[39]

Hind Taud and Jean-Franccois Mas. 2018. Multilayer perceptron (MLP).Geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios(2018), 451–455

2018
[40]

Linrui Tian, Qi Wang, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. 2025. EMO: Emote Portrait Alive Generating Expressive Portrait Videos with Audio2Video Diffusion Model Under Weak Conditions. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 244–260

2025
[41]

Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. 2018. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717(2018)

2018 arXiv
[42]

A Vaswani. 2017. Attention is all you need.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems(2017)

2017
[43]

Jiuniu Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Dayou Chen, Yingya Zhang, Xiang Wang, and Shiwei Zhang. 2023. Modelscope text-to-video technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571(2023)

2023 arXiv
[44]

Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Chung-Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. 2023. Disco: Disentangled control for referring human dance generation in real world.arXiv e-prints(2023), arXiv– 2307

2023
[45]

Xudong Wang, Trevor Darrell, Sai Saketh Rambhatla, Rohit Girdhar, and Ishan Misra. 2024. Instancediffusion: Instance-level control for image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6232–6242

2024
[46]

Xianyuan Wang, Zhenjiang Miao, Ruyi Zhang, and Shanshan Hao. 2019. I3d-lstm: A new model for human action recognition. InIOP conference series: materials science and engineering, Vol. 569. IOP Publishing, 032035

2019
[47]

Xiang Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Shiwei Zhang, Dayou Chen, Jiuniu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. 2024. Videocomposer: Composi- tional video synthesis with motion controllability.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36 (2024)

2024
[48]

Huawei Wei, Zejun Yang, and Zhisheng Wang. 2024. Aniportrait: Audio-driven synthesis of photorealistic portrait animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17694 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[49]

Zhisheng Xiao, Karsten Kreis, and Arash Vahdat. 2022. Tackling the Generative Learning Trilemma with Denoising Diffusion GANs. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations. Paper, 2025, Preprint S.Z. Zhou, Y.B. Wang, J.F. Wu, T. Hu, and J.N. Zhang

2022
[50]

Lingyu Xiong, Xize Cheng, Jintao Tan, Xianjia Wu, Xiandong Li, Lei Zhu, Fei Ma, Minglei Li, Huang Xu, and Zhihui Hu. 2024. SegTalker: Segmentation-based Talking Face Generation with Mask-guided Local Editing. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia...

2024
[51]

Mingwang Xu, Hui Li, Qingkun Su, Hanlin Shang, Liwei Zhang, Ce Liu, Jingdong Wang, Yao Yao, and Siyu Zhu. 2024. Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven visual synthesis for portrait image animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08801(2024)

2024 arXiv
[52]

Sicheng Xu, Guojun Chen, Yu-Xiao Guo, Jiaolong Yang, Chong Li, Zhenyu Zang, Yizhong Zhang, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo. 2024. Vasa-1: Lifelike audio-driven talking faces generated in real time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10667(2024)

2024 arXiv
[53]

Haijie Yang, Zhenyu Zhang, Hao Tang, Jianjun Qian, and Jian Yang. 2024. Con- sistentAvatar: Learning to Diffuse Fully Consistent Talking Head Avatar with Temporal Guidance. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 3964–3973

2024
[54]

Zhendong Yang, Ailing Zeng, Chun Yuan, and Yu Li. 2023. Effective whole- body pose estimation with two-stages distillation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 4210–4220

2023
[55]

Ziyu Yao, Xuxin Cheng, and Zhiqi Huang. 2024. FD2Talk: Towards Generalized Talking Head Generation with Facial Decoupled Diffusion Model. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 3411–3420

2024
[56]

Youngwoo Yoon, Bok Cha, Joo-Haeng Lee, Minsu Jang, Jaeyeon Lee, Jaehong Kim, and Geehyuk Lee. 2020. Speech gesture generation from the trimodal context of text, audio, and speaker identity.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)39, 6 (2020), 1–16

2020
[57]

Longhao Zhang, Shuang Liang, Zhipeng Ge, and Tianshu Hu. 2024. Personatalk: Bring attention to your persona in visual dubbing. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers. 1–9

2024
[58]

Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2023. Adding conditional con- trol to text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 3836–3847

2023
[59]

Zhenghao Zhang, Junchao Liao, Menghao Li, Zuozhuo Dai, Bingxue Qiu, Siyu Zhu, Long Qin, and Weizhi Wang. 2024. Tora: Trajectory-oriented diffusion transformer for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21705(2024)

2024 arXiv
[60]

Hang Zhou, Yasheng Sun, Wayne Wu, Chen Change Loy, Xiaogang Wang, and Ziwei Liu. 2021. Pose-controllable talking face generation by implicitly modu- larized audio-visual representation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4176–4186

2021
[61]

Shenhao Zhu, Junming Leo Chen, Zuozhuo Dai, Zilong Dong, Yinghui Xu, Xun Cao, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Siyu Zhu. 2025. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 145–162

2025
[2015]

In International conference on machine learning

Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2256–2265
[2020]

InComputer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XVIII 16

Style transfer for co-speech gesture animation: A multi-speaker conditional- mixture approach. InComputer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XVIII 16. Springer, 248–265

2020
[2024]

InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

DiffTED: One-shot Audio-driven TED Talk Video Generation with Diffusion-based Co-speech Gestures. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1922–1931

1922

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Chaitanya Ahuja, Dong Won Lee, Yukiko I Nakano, and Louis-Philippe Morency

work page

[2] [2]

Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dockhorn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. 2023. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF A Unit Enhancement and Guidance Framework for Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation Paper, 2025, Preprint Conference on Computer Vis...

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Shengqu Cai, Eric Chan, Yunzhi Zhang, Leonidas Guibas, Jiajun Wu, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2024. Diffusion Self-Distillation for Zero-Shot Customized Image Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18616(2024)

arXiv 2024

[4] [4]

Aggelina Chatziagapi, Bindita Chaudhuri, Amit Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Dimitris Samaras, and Nikolaos Sarafianos. 2024. TalkinNeRF: Animatable Neural Fields for Full-Body Talking Humans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16666(2024)

arXiv 2024

[5] [5]

Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. 2024. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7310–7320

2024

[6] [6]

Enric Corona, Andrei Zanfir, Eduard Gabriel Bazavan, Nikos Kolotouros, Thiemo Alldieck, and Cristian Sminchisescu. 2024. VLOGGER: Multimodal diffusion for embodied avatar synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08764(2024)

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Shiry Ginosar, Amir Bar, Gefen Kohavi, Caroline Chan, Andrew Owens, and Jitendra Malik. 2019. Learning individual styles of conversational gesture. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3497–3506

2019

[8] [8]

Jianzhu Guo, Dingyun Zhang, Xiaoqiang Liu, Zhizhou Zhong, Yuan Zhang, Pengfei Wan, and Di Zhang. 2024. Liveportrait: Efficient portrait animation with stitching and retargeting control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03168(2024)

arXiv 2024