Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Self-limited tidal heating and prolonged magma oceans in the L 98-59 system

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tidal heating can keep L 98-59 b molten today

desk verdict Solid, novel feedback mechanism, but the present-day magma ocean claim for L 98-59 b rests on an orbit that would have circularized a billion years ago. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03604 v2 pith:5SVUGT7C submitted 2025-05-06 astro-ph.EP

Harrison Nicholls , Claire Marie Guimond , Hamish C. F. C. Hay , Richard D. Chatterjee , Tim Lichtenberg , Raymond T. Pierrehumbert This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords tidalheatingmagmaoceanradiation-tide-rheologyfeedbackL98-59rockyexoplanetevolutionmantlerheologyatmosphericblanketingsecondaryatmosphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that tidal heating inside close-in rocky planets is self-limited, not runaway: as a hot planet cools, its mantle becomes viscous enough that tidal dissipation switches on, and the resulting heating slows or stops the cooling. The authors term this the 'radiation-tide-rheology feedback,' and they show it sets equilibrium tidal heat fluxes far below earlier estimates. Simulating the early evolution of the L 98-59 planets b, c, and d, they find that planet b likely still hosts a molten interior today, with or without an atmosphere, while c and d need atmospheric blanketing to remain molten. This matters because lasting magma oceans extend outgassing and change what atmospheres we expect to see on such planets.

What carries the argument

The radiation-tide-rheology feedback: a coupled negative feedback loop in which radiative cooling to space, tidal heat dissipation, and temperature-dependent mantle rheology regulate one another. The load-bearing identity is global energy balance: at equilibrium, tidal heat flux through the interior equals the net energy flux the atmosphere transports to space, $F_{\mathrm{tide}} = F_{\mathrm{net}}$. This equality, together with the critical melt fraction $\Phi_c = 30\%$ where the mantle transitions from liquid-like to solid-like behaviour, fixes the equilibrium state far from the runaway-heating regime assumed by earlier work.

What would settle it

A secondary-eclipse observation of L 98-59 b measuring a dayside brightness temperature below the silicate solidus (~1400 K) would falsify the claim that tidal heating keeps it molten today. Alternatively, a precise eccentricity determination showing e < 0.001 would remove the tidal heat source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a negative feedback that can hold a rocky planet in a partially molten state indefinitely. When a fully molten planet cools, its melt fraction falls toward the critical value at which the mantle behaves as a solid and tidal dissipation becomes strong; the resulting internal heating raises the temperature back up, so the planet settles near that critical melt fraction in global energy balance, $F_{\mathrm{tide}} = F_{\mathrm{net}}$. Applied to L 98-59 b, c, and d, the feedback produces equilibrium states with median melt fractions 36.5–39.2% and tidal heat fluxes 52–113 W m$^{-2}$, two orders of magnitude lower than prior estimates that ignored atmospheric coupling. The authors conclude that L 98-59 b may have a permanent magma ocean to this day, whether or not it retains an atmosphere, and that the same mechanism can prolong magma oceans on c and d as long as they have atmospheres.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the planets' orbits stay at their observed eccentricities forever (orbital steady state); if nothing keeps the eccentricities pumped, tidal heating would decay as the orbits circularize, and the predicted present-day molten state for L 98-59 b would not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equilibrium tidal heat fluxes in close-in rocky exoplanets are up to two orders of magnitude lower than previously estimated, because earlier work did not couple atmospheric energy transport to interior thermal evolution.
  • Magma oceans on eccentric, close-in rocky planets can persist for billions of years, not just the <100 Myr found without tides, provided the orbit does not circularize.
  • L 98-59 b is likely molten today; secondary-eclipse thermal observations can test this directly.
  • The feedback creates stable equilibria that can be destroyed by a 'blue sky' bifurcation as the host star dims, causing rapid solidification and potentially catastrophic outgassing.
  • The framework offers a way to probe a planet's hot- vs cold-start formation history from its present-day thermal state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same feedback operates on Io, the Juno result that Io lacks a magma ocean can be read as a cold-start outcome rather than a failure of tidal heating to melt it.
  • The paper's results imply that atmospheric composition indirectly controls interior heat output: a stronger greenhouse atmosphere shifts the equilibrium to higher tidal flux, so atmospheric loss could double as a switch that shuts off tidal melting.
  • A testable extension: for any eccentric close-in rocky planet, the equilibrium melt fraction should hover near 30%, implying a narrow range of tidal quality factors that could be probed with future astrometric detection of tidal deformation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper simulates the coupled thermal, atmospheric, and tidal evolution of the three rocky planets in L 98-59 using the proteus/agni/spider framework extended with the lovepy tidal dissipation model. It proposes a 'radiation-tide-rheology feedback': as a magma ocean cools, mantle viscosity increases, tidal heating peaks, and the resulting internal flux balances atmospheric radiative cooling, stabilizing whole-mantle melt fractions just above the assumed critical value (30%) rather than allowing complete solidification. In no-tide control simulations all three planets solidify within 100 Myr, whereas most tide-inclusive simulations reach global energy balance with melt fractions around 36-39% and tidal fluxes of 52-113 W/m2, one to two orders of magnitude below previous estimates. A no-atmosphere simulation of L 98-59 b also remains molten (F_tide about 1e5 W/m2), whereas c and d solidify without atmospheres. Sensitivity runs vary eccentricity, oxygen fugacity, and core radius, and the paper also estimates XUV-driven escape and tests convective stability. The conclusion states that L 98-59 b may have a permanent magma ocean to the present day.

Significance. If correct, the mechanism is significant: it provides a self-limiting equilibrium for tidal heating that changes predicted heat fluxes and surface temperatures for close-in rocky exoplanets by orders of magnitude, and it gives a concrete pathway to Gyr-lived magma oceans and tidally supported volcanic outgassing. The predictions of median equilibrium fluxes (52-113 W/m2) and melt fractions, together with the distinct no-atmosphere outcomes for b versus c/d, are falsifiable with secondary-eclipse and transmission observations. The paper is unusually transparent: the model codes (proteus, agni, lovepy) are open or archived, data are deposited on Zenodo, and the authors explicitly list the orbital steady-state assumption and the neglect of coupled escape as limitations. These strengths make the core early-evolution result, namely that tides can hold the mantle near the critical melt fraction for at least 200 Myr, credible. The present-day extrapolation, however, is not yet supported by the calculations as presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Conclusion (ii)] The 'permanent magma ocean to this day' claim rests on an orbital steady-state assumption that is not demonstrated. In every simulation the eccentricity is held fixed, and Section 3.5 only varies fixed values, so the simulations consume orbital energy without allowing the orbit to respond. Using the paper's own median equilibrium flux for planet b (F_tide = 52 W m-2, Fig. 5), the dissipated power is about 2e16 W; for e = 0.167 at a = 0.02191 AU around a 0.273 Msun star with Mp = 0.47 Mearth, the orbital energy available from circularization is about 4e32 J, giving an e-folding time for e^2 of order 0.7 Gyr. The no-atmosphere case (F_tide = 1.08e5 W m-2, Section 3.4) gives a timescale of order 1e5 yr. Since the system age is 4.94 Gyr and no eccentricity pump is identified, the period ratios c/b ~ 1.63 and d/c ~ 2.02 do not by themselves demonstrate a sustained commensurability. The authors should either couple tidal orbital evolution to the thermal model, identify and model a pumping mechanism, or restrict the claim to 'at least 200 Myr while eccentricity is maintained.'
  2. [Sections 3.4, 3.5, and 4.1] The full simulations terminate at global energy balance (no later than 10 Myr in Fig. 5) or at 200 Myr (Section 3.5), while the conclusions invoke Gyr timescales. The stellar bolometric flux decreases by about 20% between 100 Myr and the present (Section 4.1), which moves the equilibrium; the blue-sky bifurcation discussion in Appendix B is based on the toy model (Eq. A6), not on the full proteus model. The paper should either integrate the full model past 200 Myr with evolving stellar luminosity and, ideally, parameterized escape, or explicitly state that the Gyr-timescale extension is an inference from the toy model rather than a result of the coupled simulations.
  3. [Section 2.1 and Fig. 5] The critical melt fraction Phi_c is fixed at 30%, and the equilibrium melt fractions cluster in the narrow band 36.5-39.2%, only 6-9 percentage points above Phi_c. Because the feedback operates by pinning the melt fraction near Phi_c, the quantitative results, especially the median heat fluxes 52-113 W/m2, are potentially sensitive to this parameter. No sensitivity calculation is reported. A series of simulations varying Phi_c over a plausible range (e.g., 20-40%) should be added to demonstrate that the self-limited fluxes and the prolonged magma ocean conclusion are robust to this choice.
  4. [Appendix A and Section 3.2] The toy model's 'demonstration' of the feedback is partly assumed in its construction. Equation (A5) posits a Gaussian tidal heating peak centered between the solidus and liquidus, so the qualitative behavior, with heating weak in the fully molten and fully solid states and strong near the critical melt fraction, is built into the model rather than derived from it. The full proteus/lovepy model, which uses a literature-based Maxwell rheology, does reproduce similar behavior, so this does not invalidate the central mechanism; however, the manuscript should state clearly that the toy model is an illustration and that the physical evidence for the feedback comes primarily from Sections 3.4-3.5.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B] The word 'recieved' should be 'received'.
  2. [Sections 3.4 and 3.5, Figs. 5 and 6] The text says the main simulations reach global energy balance generally within 10 Myr, while the sensitivity runs are evolved past equilibrium to up to 200 Myr; please clarify which simulations are shown in Fig. 5 versus Fig. 6, since the termination criteria differ.
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] Equation (C1) is typeset in a way that is difficult to parse, with the factor involving R_optical/R_xuv appearing before the fraction; please check the equation formatting to ensure it matches the Watson et al. (1981) and Lehmer & Catling (2017) form.
  4. [Fig. 3] The colorbar label reads 'Time [Myr]' but the text describes solidification times; please make the caption explicit that the colour indicates the time at which the mantle solidifies.
  5. [Table 1 and Section 2.2] The table caption states that the equilibrium temperatures are calculated with a Bond albedo of 30%, but Section 2.2 does not specify how the albedo enters the radiative-convective model; a short sentence reconciling the table's equilibrium temperatures with the instellation values would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coupled model's equilibrium heat fluxes are computed from independent rheology and atmospheric radiative transfer, not fitted to the target result.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Tidal heating is computed by lovepy (Hay & Matsuyama 2019b) from gravito-viscoelastic deformation using melt-fraction-dependent rheology from Kervazo et al. (2021); atmospheric energy transport is computed by agni/proteus via correlated-k radiative transfer; the reported equilibrium heat fluxes are found by time-stepping until global energy balance (F_tide = F_net) is reached, not by fitting F_tide to a desired outcome. The semi-analytic model in Appendix A is explicitly heuristic ('we heuristically parametrise tidal heating with a Gaussian function', Eq. A5) and is presented as a toy for qualitative interpretation, not as independent evidence; the full model provides the quantitative demonstration. The tendency of equilibria to lie near the critical melt fraction is a physical consequence of the rheological transition at Phi_c = 30% (onset of efficient solid-phase tidal heating), not a parameter fitted to reproduce the observed melt fractions; the median outputs are 36.5-39.2%, above Phi_c, with a wide spread, showing that the atmosphere and other physics shift the equilibria. The orbital steady-state assumption is an acknowledged modelling limitation affecting the Gyr extrapolation, but it is not a circular reduction: eccentricity is an input, not a derived target. Self-citations to proteus, agni and lovepy are code/software references, and lovepy is independently published (Hay & Matsuyama 2019b); none of these citations is invoked to forbid alternatives or to supply an unverified uniqueness theorem. No step in the derivation equates an output to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a chain of modeling assumptions: Maxwell rheology, fixed eccentricity, a hot fully molten start, Earth-like volatile inventory, isochemical ideal-gas atmospheres, no atmospheric escape, and no radiogenic heating. The toy model's Gaussian heating parameterization is an ad hoc construction, though the full proteus model does not rely on it. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Critical melt fraction Phi_c = 0.30
    Sets the melt fraction at which the mantle becomes solid-like and tidal dissipation becomes efficient (Section 2.1). Equilibrium melt fractions in Fig. 5 cluster just above this value, so the quantitative result is sensitive to this literature-based choice.
  • Core radius fraction r_c = varied 0.50-0.90
    Grid input spanning unknown interior structure; affects melt volume and cooling rate (Figs. 3-4). Median results are quoted across this range.
  • Oxygen fugacity deltaIW = varied -5 to +5
    Grid input controlling outgassed atmospheric composition and greenhouse effect (Fig. D1); drives spread in surface temperatures and melt fractions.
  • Initial volatile inventory (H,C,N,S) = 109, 109, 2.01, 235 ppmw
    Fixed to Earth primitive mantle estimates (Wang et al. 2018); larger inventories would produce thicker atmospheres and longer-lived magma oceans (Appendix D).
  • Toy model tidal heating Gaussian parameters (F_c, T_c, T_w) = varied; T_c between solidus and liquidus
    Ad hoc parameterization in Appendix A (Eq. A5); used only for qualitative demonstration and not in the full model.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Maxwell viscoelastic rheology for solid mantle tidal deformation
    lovepy integrates gravito-viscoelasticity with matrix propagator; mantle is a Maxwell solid with melt-dependent viscosity and moduli (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Degree-2 eccentric tidal forcing from synchronous rotation; no planet-planet tides
    Section 2.1; higher eccentricity terms and mutual planet tides neglected.
  • domain assumption Orbital steady state (fixed eccentricity)
    Section 2.3; eccentricity damping and excitation not modeled, yet long-term heating depends on e being maintained.
  • domain assumption Hot-start initial condition: fully molten mantle with adiabatic temperature profile
    Section 2.1; standard for magma ocean studies but not guaranteed.
  • domain assumption No atmospheric escape within evolutionary simulations
    Section 2.1; escape treated only in separate context estimates (Appendix C), so long-term volatile inventories may be overestimated.
  • domain assumption Isochemical well-mixed atmosphere with ideal gas EOS
    Section 4.4 acknowledges non-ideal EOS and mixing limitations; high surface pressures (125-630 bar) may stress ideal gas assumption.
  • domain assumption Radiogenic heating neglected
    Section 2.1; isolates tidal heating, but adds a missing heat source that would generally favor magma ocean persistence.
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian tidal heating curve in toy model
    Appendix A Eq. A5; the feedback is put in by hand in the toy model, making it an illustration rather than independent confirmation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-limited tidal heating and prolonged magma oceans in the L 98-59 system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5SVUGT7C

@misc{pith2026250503604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-limited tidal heating and prolonged magma oceans in the L 98-59 system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5SVUGT7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03604}
}
read the original abstract

Rocky exoplanets accessible to characterisation often lie on close-in orbits where tidal heating within their interiors is significant, with the L 98-59 planetary system being a prime example. As a long-term energy source for ongoing mantle melting and outgassing, tidal heating has been considered as a way to replenish lost atmospheres on rocky planets around active M-dwarfs. We simulate the early evolution of L 98-59 b, c and d using a time-evolved interior-atmosphere modelling framework, with a self-consistent implementation of tidal heating and redox-controlled outgassing. Emerging from our calculations is a novel self-limiting mechanism between radiative cooling, tidal heating, and mantle rheology, which we term the `radiation-tide-rheology feedback'. Our coupled modelling yields self-limiting tidal heating estimates that are up to two orders of magnitude lower than previous calculations, and yet are still large enough to enable the extension of primordial magma oceans to Gyr timescales. Comparisons with a semi-analytic model demonstrate that this negative feedback is a robust mechanism which can probe a given planet's initial conditions, atmospheric composition, and interior structure. The orbit and instellation of the sub-Venus L 98-59 b likely place it in a regime where tidal heating has kept the planet molten up to the present day, even if it were to have lost its atmosphere. For c and d, a long-lived magma ocean can be induced by tides only with additional atmospheric regulation of energy transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Log-scaled surface tidal heat flux calculated by lovepy using a Maxwell viscoelastic rheology for a range of shear viscosities, orbital ec￾centricities, and orbital periods. For the illustrative purposes of this specific plot, the shear modulus (𝜇 = 60 GPa) and bulk modulus (𝜅 = 200 GPa) are fixed at the solid phase end-member values from Kervazo et al. (2021). The eccentricity is set to 0.05 in the top panel. The v… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulated behaviour for a toy analogue of L 98-59 b calculated with our semi-analytic model of thermal evolution. Temperature is plotted over time for different initial temperatures 𝑇0 (line style) and tidal heating amplitudes 𝐹𝑐 (line colour). The shaded region shows the temperature regime in which tidal heating is significant, via Equation A5. The black line shows the temperature at which tidal heating is maximise… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Solidification time for L 98-59 b/c/d modelled by proteus in the absence of tidal heating. Solidification time (colour bars) varies between the planets, and also varies by metallic core radius fraction 𝑟𝑐 (y-axes) and surface 𝑓 O2 (x-axes). a hot-start, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Corner plot of tidal heat flux 𝐹tide versus mantle melt fraction Φ, for tidally heated evolution outcomes of planets b/c/d (colours). This represents the point at which these simulations reach global energy balance, which is no later than 10 Myr. Dashed lines indicate …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: presents the results of these simulations by plotting mantle melt fraction Φ versus time. All three planets are able to achieve global energy balance with large melt fractions when the orbital eccentricity is large. Planet b (top panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cycle-averaged XUV energy flux (solid purple line) and variable X￾ray flux (dashed purple line) over time for L 98-59 (0.273 M⊙) calculated with mors (Johnstone et al. 2021), scaled to a present-day median habitable zone (HZ; Kopparapu et al. 2013) orbit of 0.163 AU ar…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Test profiles of atmospheric temperature (left) and convective heat flux (right) modelled for L 98-59 d. We consider three observationally￾motivated atmospheric gas compositions (line colour) and three values for the internal heat flux (line style). Note the log scalin…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detailed Architecture of the L 98-59 System and Confirmation of a Fifth Planet in the Habitable Zone

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper confirms a non-transiting habitable-zone super-Earth (L 98-59 f) and refines masses, radii, and near-circular eccentricities for all five planets in the L 98-59 system.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

195 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abe Y., Matsui T., 1986, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth] https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB13p0E291 , 91, E291

    doi:10.1029/jb091ib13p0e291 1986

  2. [2]

    Agol E., et al., 2021, @doi [The Planetary Science Journal] 10.3847/PSJ/abd022 , 2, 1

    doi:10.3847/psj/abd022 2021

  3. [3]

    Andrault D., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Geoscience] 10.1038/s41561-017-0053-9 , 11, 139

    doi:10.1038/s41561-017-0053-9 2018

  4. [4]

    A., et al., 2025, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.11.012 , 388, 61

    Anzures B. A., et al., 2025, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.11.012 , 388, 61

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2024.11.012 2025

  5. [5]

    Ardia P., Hirschmann M., Withers A., Stanley B., 2013, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.03.028 , 114, 52

    doi:10.1016/j.gca.2013.03.028 2013

  6. [6]

    S., Hirschmann M

    Armstrong L. S., Hirschmann M. M., Stanley B. D., Falksen E. G., Jacobsen S. D., 2015, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.07.007 , 171, 283

    doi:10.1016/j.gca.2015.07.007 2015

  7. [7]

    Banerjee A., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d0 , 975, L11

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d0 2024

  8. [8]

    S., Allard F., Hauschildt P

    Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Barman T. S., Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...402..701B 402, 701

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 2003

Show all 195 references
  1. [9]

    Baraffe I., Homeier D., Allard F., Chabrier G., 2015, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , 577, A42

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    G., Mann A

    Barber M. G., Mann A. W., Vanderburg A., Boyle A. W., Murillo A. I. L., 2025, TESS Investigation -- Demographics of Young Exoplanets (TI-DYE) III: an inner super-Earth in TOI-2076 ( @eprint arXiv 2505.06358 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06358

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    arXiv:2301.10866

    Barclay T., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2301.10866 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230110866B p. arXiv:2301.10866

    2023 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    arXiv:2502.09730

    Barclay T., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250209730B p. arXiv:2502.09730

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    C., Dobos V., Kiss L

    Barr A. C., Dobos V., Kiss L. L., 2018, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731992 , 613, A37

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acdb70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...35B 166, 35

    Behr P. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acdb70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...35B 166, 35

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Bello-Arufe A., et al., 2025, Evidence for a volcanic atmosphere on the sub-Earth L98-59b ( @eprint arXiv 2501.18680 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18680

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Beuthe M., 2013, Icarus, 223, 308

    2013

  9. [17]

    J., 2024, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116026 , 414, 116026

    Bierson C. J., 2024, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116026 , 414, 116026

    2024

  10. [18]

    J., Nimmo F., 2016, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1002/2016JE005005 , 121, 2211

    Bierson C. J., Nimmo F., 2016, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1002/2016JE005005 , 121, 2211

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    L., Kyuberis A

    Birk M., Wagner G., Loos J., Lodi L., Polyansky O. L., Kyuberis A. A., Zobov N. F., Tennyson J., 2017, @doi [Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.03.040 , 203, 88

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    D., Nicholls H., Lichtenberg T., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250511149B p

    Boer I. D., Nicholls H., Lichtenberg T., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250511149B p. arXiv:2505.11149

    2025 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    F., 2022, @doi [Environmental Research Letters] 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8944 , 17, 093006

    Boers N., Ghil M., Stocker T. F., 2022, @doi [Environmental Research Letters] 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8944 , 17, 093006

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    N., Leconte J., 2011, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117734 , 535, A94

    Bolmont E., Raymond S. N., Leconte J., 2011, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117734 , 535, A94

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    N., von Paris P., Selsis F., Hersant F., Quintana E

    Bolmont E., Raymond S. N., von Paris P., Selsis F., Hersant F., Quintana E. V., Barclay T., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/3 , 793, 3

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    J., Timpe M

    Bonati I., Lichtenberg T., Bower D. J., Timpe M. L., Quanz S. P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A.125B 621, A125

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    W., Parmentier E

    Boukar \'e C.-E., Parman S. W., Parmentier E. M., Anzures B. A., 2019, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1029/2019JE005942 , 124, 3354

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    B., Badro J., 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 936, 148

    Boukare C.-E., Cowan N. B., Badro J., 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 936, 148

    2022

  19. [27]

    J., Sanan P., Wolf A

    Bower D. J., Sanan P., Wolf A. S., 2018, @doi [Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors] 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.11.004 , 274, 49

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Kitzmann D., Wolf A

    Bower D. J., Kitzmann D., Wolf A. S., Sanan P., Dorn C., Oza A. V., 2019, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935710 , 631, A103

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Hakim K., Sossi P

    Bower D. J., Hakim K., Sossi P. A., Sanan P., 2022, @doi [The Planetary Science Journal] 10.3847/PSJ/ac5fb1 , 3, 93

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Burn R., Mordasini C., Mishra L., Haldemann J., Venturini J., Emsenhuber A., Henning T., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-02183-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8..463B 8, 463

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    M., Asphaug E., 2001, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Natur.412..708C 412, 708

    Canup R. M., Asphaug E., 2001, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Natur.412..708C 412, 708

    2001

  24. [32]

    K., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1039 , 167, 54

    Capistrant B. K., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1039 , 167, 54

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    J., 2019, @doi [Elements] 10.2138/gselements.15.1.39 , 15, 39

    Cartier C., Wood B. J., 2019, @doi [Elements] 10.2138/gselements.15.1.39 , 15, 39

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    C., Efroimsky M., Lainey V., 2011, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research E: Planets] 10.1029/2010JE003664 , 116, 1

    Castillo-Rogez J. C., Efroimsky M., Lainey V., 2011, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research E: Planets] 10.1029/2010JE003664 , 116, 1

    2011 doi

  27. [35]

    arXiv:2410.13457

    Cesario L., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.13457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241013457C p. arXiv:2410.13457

    2024 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    W., 1986, JANAF thermochemical tables

    Chase M. W., 1986, JANAF thermochemical tables

    1986

  29. [37]

    D., Pierrehumbert R

    Chatterjee R. D., Pierrehumbert R. T., 2024, Novel Physics of Escaping Secondary Atmospheres May Shape the Cosmic Shoreline ( @eprint arXiv 2412.05188 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05188

    2024

  30. [38]

    J., Sossi P

    Cherubim C., Wordsworth R., Bower D. J., Sossi P. A., Adams D., Hu R., 2025, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/adbca9 , 983, 97

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    Cloutier R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935957 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...629A.111C 629, A111

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Costa A., Caricchi L., Bagdassarov N., 2009, @doi [Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems] https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002138 , 10

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    E., Tiscareno M

    Cuk M., Moutamid M. E., Tiscareno M. S., 2020, @doi [The Planetary Science Journal] 10.3847/PSJ/ab9748 , 1, 22

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Damiano M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac9472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164..225D 164, 225

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Dasgupta R., Falksen E., Pal A., Sun C., 2022, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.09.012 , 336, 291

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Demangeon O. D. S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..41D 653, A41

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Demory B.-O., et al., 2016, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature17169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.532..207D 532, 207

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    Cycle 2, ID

    Diamond-Lowe H., et al., 2023, The Hot Rocks Survey: Testing 9 Irradiated Terrestrial Exoplanets for Atmospheres , JWST Proposal. Cycle 2, ID. \#3730

    2023

  39. [47]

    Dorn C., Lichtenberg T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac33af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922L...4D 922, L4

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Driscoll P., Barnes R., 2015, @doi [Astrobiology] 10.1089/ast.2015.1325 , 15, 739

    2015

  41. [49]

    Ducrot E., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02428-z

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    M., Slingo A., 1996, @doi [Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society] 10.1002/qj.49712253107 , 122, 689

    Edwards J. M., Slingo A., 1996, @doi [Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society] 10.1002/qj.49712253107 , 122, 689

    1996 doi

  43. [51]

    Elkins-Tanton L., 2008, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062 , 271, 181

    2008 doi

  44. [52]

    G., Guinan E

    Engle S. G., Guinan E. F., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf472 , 954, L50

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    W., 1984, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.223.4640.1072 , 223, 1072

    Esposito L. W., 1984, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.223.4640.1072 , 223, 1072

    1984

  46. [54]

    Farhat M., Auclair-Desrotour P., Bou \'e G., Lichtenberg T., Laskar J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b93 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..133F 979, 133

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Spohn T., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0019-1035(90)90005-T , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Icar...83...39F 83, 39

    Fischer H. J., Spohn T., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0019-1035(90)90005-T , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Icar...83...39F 83, 39

    1990 doi

  48. [56]

    B., Thompson J

    Fortin M.-A., Gazel E., Williams D. B., Thompson J. O., Kaltenegger L., Ramsey M. S., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7d89 , 974, L7

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    France K., et al., 2020, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/abb465 , 160, 237

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    Gaillard F., et al., 2021, @doi [Space Science Reviews] 10.1007/s11214-021-00802-1 , 217, 22

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    Gaillard F., et al., 2022, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117255 , 577, 117255

    2022

  52. [60]

    Ghil M., 1976, @doi [Journal of Atmospheric Sciences] 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0003:CSFAST>2.0.CO;2 , 33, 3

    1976 doi

  53. [61]

    Gillon M., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature21360 , 542, 456

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    J., 2012, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences] 10.1098/rsta.2012.0004 , 370, 4197

    Goldblatt C., Watson A. J., 2012, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences] 10.1098/rsta.2012.0004 , 370, 4197

    2012

  55. [63]

    Gressier A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975L..10G 975, L10

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    L., et al., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/abd773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..253...30G 253, 30

    Grimm S. L., et al., 2021, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/abd773 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..253...30G 253, 30

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913396 , 520, A27

    Guillot, T. 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913396 , 520, A27

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    M., Noack L., Ortenzi G., Sohl F., 2021, @doi [Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors] 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106788 , 320, 106788

    Guimond C. M., Noack L., Ortenzi G., Sohl F., 2021, @doi [Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors] 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106788 , 320, 106788

    2021

  59. [67]

    M., Shorttle O., Rudge J

    Guimond C. M., Shorttle O., Rudge J. F., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad148 , 521, 2535

    2023 doi

  60. [68]

    Guimond C. M., Wang H., Seidler F., Sossi P., Mahajan A., Shorttle O., 2024, From Stars to Diverse Mantles, Melts, Crusts and Atmospheres of Rocky Exoplanets ( @eprint arXiv 2404.15427 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2404.15427

    2024 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Haldemann, Jonas Dorn, Caroline Venturini, Julia Alibert, Yann Benz, Willy 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346965 , 681, A96

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    Hamano K., Abe Y., Genda H., 2013, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature12163 , 497, 607

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    L., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/216 , 806, 216

    Hamano K., Kawahara H., Abe Y., Onishi M., Hashimoto G. L., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/216 , 806, 216

    2015 doi

  64. [72]

    Hammond M., et al., 2025, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ada0bc , 978, L40

    2025 doi

  65. [73]

    C., Matsuyama I., 2019a, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.019 , 319, 68

    Hay H. C., Matsuyama I., 2019a, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.019 , 319, 68

    2018 doi

  66. [74]

    Hay H. C. F. C., Matsuyama I., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875...22H 875, 22

    doi

  67. [75]

    Hay H. C. F. C., Trinh A., Matsuyama I., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1029/2020GL088317 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020GeoRL..4788317H 47, e88317

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    C., Matsuyama I., Pappalardo R

    Hay H. C., Matsuyama I., Pappalardo R. T., 2022, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1029/2021JE007064 , 127

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    Leconte, J

    Heller, R. Leconte, J. Barnes, R. 2011, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015809 , 528, A27

    2011 doi

  70. [78]

    G., O'Connell R

    Henning W. G., O'Connell R. J., Sasselov D. D., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1000 , 707, 1000

    2009 doi

  71. [79]

    M., 2017, @doi [Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems] https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC006937 , 18, 3078

    Hier-Majumder S., Hirschmann M. M., 2017, @doi [Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems] https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC006937 , 18, 3078

    2017 doi

  72. [80]

    Hu R., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-024-07432-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.630..609H 630, 609

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    P., Bartel M., Güdel M., 2021, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038407 , 649, A96

    Johnstone C. P., Bartel M., Güdel M., 2021, @doi [Astronomy & Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038407 , 649, A96

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    Joyce M., Tayar J., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11030075 , 11, 75

    2023 doi

  75. [83]

    G., Sasselov D

    Kaltenegger L., Henning W. G., Sasselov D. D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1370 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1370K 140, 1370

    2010 doi

  76. [84]

    F., 1988, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9 , 74, 472

    Kasting J. F., 1988, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9 , 74, 472

    1988 doi

  77. [85]

    L., Tosi N., Schreier F., Rauer H., 2019, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d85 , 875, 31

    Katyal N., Nikolaou A., Godolt M., Grenfell J. L., Tosi N., Schreier F., Rauer H., 2019, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d85 , 875, 31

    2019 doi

  78. [86]

    M., 1964, @doi [Reviews of Geophysics] 10.1029/RG002i004p00661 , 2, 661

    Kaula W. M., 1964, @doi [Reviews of Geophysics] 10.1029/RG002i004p00661 , 2, 661

    1964 doi

  79. [87]

    Kervazo M., Tobie G., Choblet G., Dumoulin C., Behounkova M., 2021, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039433 , 650, A72

    2021 doi

  80. [88]

    G., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0284-0 , 1, 878

    Kislyakova K. G., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0284-0 , 1, 878

    2017 doi

  81. [89]

    G., Noack L., Sanchis E., Fossati L., Valyavin G

    Kislyakova K. G., Noack L., Sanchis E., Fossati L., Valyavin G. G., Golabek G. J., Gudel M., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245225 , 677, A109

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    S., Barnett M

    Kite E. S., Barnett M. N., 2020, @doi [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences] 10.1073/pnas.2006177117 , 117, 18264

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    S., Fegley Jr

    Kite E. S., Fegley Jr. B., Schaefer L., Ford E. B., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6ffb , 891, 111

    2020 doi

  84. [92]

    Komasa J., Piszczatowski K., Lach G., Przybytek M., Jeziorski B., Pachucki K., 2011, @doi [Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation] 10.1021/ct200438t , 7, 3105

    2011 doi

  85. [93]

    K., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/131 , 765, 131

    Kopparapu R. K., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/131 , 765, 131

    2013 doi

  86. [94]

    Korenaga J., 2008, @doi [Reviews of Geophysics] https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000241 , 46

    2008 doi

  87. [95]

    Korenaga J., 2023, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115564 , 400, 115564

    2023

  88. [96]

    B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158...32K 158, 32

    Kostov V. B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158...32K 158, 32

    2019 doi

  89. [97]

    J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69cb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..115K 933, 115

    Krissansen-Totton J., Fortney J. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69cb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..115K 933, 115

    2022 doi

  90. [99]

    J., 2024b, @doi [Nat

    Krissansen-Totton J., Wogan N., Thompson M., Fortney J. J., 2024b, @doi [Nat. Commun.] 10.1038/s41467-024-52642-6 , 15, 1

    doi

  91. [100]

    A., Oinas V., 1991, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research] 10.1029/90jd01945 , 96, 9027

    Lacis A. A., Oinas V., 1991, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research] 10.1029/90jd01945 , 96, 9027

    1991 doi

  92. [101]

    H., Parman S., Huber C., Parmentier E

    Lark L. H., Parman S., Huber C., Parmentier E. M., Head III J. W., 2022, @doi [Geophysical Research Letters] 10.1029/2021GL096713 , 49, e2021GL096713

    2022 doi

  93. [102]

    Lebrun T., Massol H., Chassefière E., Davaille A., Marcq E., Sarda P., Leblanc F., Brandeis G., 2013, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1002/jgre.20068 , 118, 1155

    2013 doi

  94. [103]

    R., Catling D

    Lehmer O. R., Catling D. C., 2017, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8137 , 845, 130

    2017 doi

  95. [104]

    R., Catling D

    Lehmer O. R., Catling D. C., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bda , 894, 81

    2020 doi

  96. [105]

    G., Bierson C

    Lemasquerier D. G., Bierson C. J., Soderlund K. M., 2023, @doi [AGU Advances] 10.1029/2023AV000994 , 4, e2023AV000994

    2023 doi

  97. [106]

    Lenardic A., Crowley J., Jellinek A., Weller M., 2016, @doi [Astrobiology] 10.1089/ast.2015.1378 , 16, 551

    2016

  98. [107]

    S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938L...3L 938, L3

    Lichtenberg T., Clement M. S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938L...3L 938, L3

    2022 doi

  99. [108]

    Lichtenberg T., Miguel Y., 2025, @doi [Treatise on Geochemistry] 10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00122-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025TrGeo...7...51L 7, 51

    2025 doi

  100. [109]

    J., Hammond M., Boukrouche R., Sanan P., Tsai S., Pierrehumbert R

    Lichtenberg T., Bower D. J., Hammond M., Boukrouche R., Sanan P., Tsai S., Pierrehumbert R. T., 2021, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] 10.1029/2020JE006711 , 126

    2021 doi

  101. [110]

    K., Nakajima M., Fischer R

    Lichtenberg T., Schaefer L. K., Nakajima M., Fischer R. A., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII. p. 907 ( @eprint arXiv 2203.10023 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv...

    2023 doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    Lodders K., Fegley B., 1998, The planetary scientist's companion / Katharina Lodders, Bruce Fegley

    1998

  103. [112]

    V., Saikia S

    Looveren G. V., Saikia S. B., Herbort O., Schleich S., Gudel M., Johnstone C., Kislyakova K., 2025, Habitable Zone and Atmosphere Retention Distance (HaZARD) Stellar-evolution-dependent loss models of secondary atmospheres, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09702

    2025 arXiv

  104. [113]

    N., 1963, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130

    Lorenz E. N., 1963, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130

    1963

  105. [114]

    Marleau G.-D., Cumming A., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1967 , 437, 1378

    2013 doi

  106. [115]

    S., Fortney J

    Marley M. S., Fortney J. J., Hubickyj O., Bodenheimer P., Lissauer J. J., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/509759 , 655, 541

    2007 doi

  107. [116]

    G., 2007, @doi [Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems] 10.1029/2006GC001455 , 8

    Mastin L. G., 2007, @doi [Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems] 10.1029/2006GC001455 , 8

    2007 doi

  108. [117]

    N., Steinke T., Nimmo F., 2022, @doi [Elements] 10.2138/gselements.18.6.374 , 18, 374

    Matsuyama I. N., Steinke T., Nimmo F., 2022, @doi [Elements] 10.2138/gselements.18.6.374 , 18, 374

    2022 doi

  109. [118]

    arXiv:2405.09284

    Maurice M., Dasgupta R., Hassanzadeh P., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09284 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240509284M p. arXiv:2405.09284

    2024 doi arXiv

  110. [119]

    Meca E., Mercader I., Batiste O., Ram\' rez-Piscina L., 2004, @doi [Phys. Rev. Lett.] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.234501 , 92, 234501

    2004 doi

  111. [120]

    G., Bower D

    Meier T. G., Bower D. J., Lichtenberg T., Hammond M., Tackley P. J., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346950 , 678, A29

    2023 doi

  112. [121]

    J., Cady-Pereira K

    Mlawer E. J., Cady-Pereira K. E., Mascio J., Gordon I. E., 2023, @doi [Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2023.108645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JQSRT.30608645M 306, 108645

    2023

  113. [122]

    Molliere P., et al., 2022, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6a56 , 934, 74

    2022 doi

  114. [123]

    B., 2001, @doi [Icarus] 10.1006/icar.2001.6739 , 154, 548

    Moore W. B., 2001, @doi [Icarus] 10.1006/icar.2001.6739 , 154, 548

    2001

  115. [124]

    B., 2003, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JE001943 , 108

    Moore W. B., 2003, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JE001943 , 108

    2003 doi

  116. [125]

    Nakayama A., Ikoma M., Terada N., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac86ca , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...937...72N 937, 72

    2022 doi

  117. [126]

    Namur O., Charlier B., Holtz F., Cartier C., McCammon C., 2016, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.05.024 , 448, 102

    2016 doi

  118. [127]

    Nicholls H., Hebrard E., Venot O., Drummond B., Evans E., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1734 , 523, 5681

    2023 doi

  119. [128]

    J., Pierrehumbert R., 2024, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JE008576 , 129, e2024JE008576

    Nicholls H., Lichtenberg T., Bower D. J., Pierrehumbert R., 2024, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JE008576 , 129, e2024JE008576

    2024 doi

  120. [129]

    Nicholls H., Pierrehumbert R., Lichtenberg T., 2025a, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.07726 , 10, 7726

    doi

  121. [130]

    T., Lichtenberg T., Soucasse L., Smeets S., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2957N 536, 2957

    Nicholls H., Pierrehumbert R. T., Lichtenberg T., Soucasse L., Smeets S., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2957N 536, 2957

    doi

  122. [131]

    W., Puchtel I

    Nicklas R. W., Puchtel I. S., Ash R. D., 2018, @doi [Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.11.002 , 222, 447

    2018 doi

  123. [132]

    S., Eggins S

    O'Neill H. S., Eggins S. M., 2002, @doi [Chemical Geology] https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00414-4 , 186, 151

    2002 doi

  124. [133]

    C., Davies G

    O'Reilly T. C., Davies G. F., 1981, @doi [Geophysical Research Letters] 10.1029/GL008i004p00313 , 8, 313

    1981 doi

  125. [134]

    W., Stevenson D

    Ojakangas G. W., Stevenson D. J., 1986, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90163-6 , 66, 341

    1986 doi

  126. [135]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/acfe12 , 166, 199

    Ostberg C. M., et al., 2023, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/acfe12 , 166, 199

    2023 doi

  127. [136]

    S., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-024-08442-5 , pp 1--3

    Park R. S., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-024-08442-5 , pp 1--3

    2024 doi

  128. [137]

    J., Marley M

    Parmentier V., Guillot T., Fortney J. J., Marley M. S., 2015, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323127 , 574, A35

    2015 doi

  129. [138]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450748 , 690, A159

    Patel J. A., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450748 , 690, A159

    2024 doi

  130. [139]

    J., Cassen P., Reynolds R

    Peale S. J., Cassen P., Reynolds R. T., 1979, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.203.4383.892 , 203, 892

    1979 doi

  131. [140]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York

    Pierrehumbert R., 2010, Principles of planetary climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York

    2010

  132. [141]

    C., Roberge A., Mlinar A

    Quick L. C., Roberge A., Mlinar A. B., Hedman M. M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab9504 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PASP..132h4402Q 132, 084402

    2020 doi

  133. [142]

    M., Barrag \'a n O., Zicher N., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.4665R 530, 4665

    Rajpaul V. M., Barrag \'a n O., Zicher N., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.4665R 530, 4665

    2024 doi

  134. [143]

    arXiv:2404.02932

    Redfield S., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240402932R p. arXiv:2404.02932

    2024 doi arXiv

  135. [144]

    P., Henning W

    Renaud J. P., Henning W. G., 2017, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab784 , 857, 98

    2017 doi

  136. [145]

    P., Henning W

    Renaud J. P., Henning W. G., Saxena P., Neveu M., Bagheri A., Mandell A., Hurford T., 2021, @doi [The Planetary Science Journal] 10.3847/PSJ/abc0f3 , 2, 4

    2021 doi

  137. [146]

    Riechers K., Mitsui T., Boers N., Ghil M., 2022, @doi [Climate of the Past] 10.5194/cp-18-863-2022 , 18, 863

    2022 doi

  138. [147]

    D., Marley M

    Robinson T. D., Marley M. S., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/158 , 785, 158

    2014 doi

  139. [148]

    G., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf628 , 539, 2230

    Rogers J. G., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf628 , 539, 2230

    2025 doi

  140. [149]

    Rollinson H., Adetunji J., Lenaz D., Szilas K., 2017, @doi [Lithos] 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.03.020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Litho.282..316R 282, 316

    2017 doi

  141. [150]

    C., Nimmo F., Melosh J., 2007, in Schubert G., ed., , Vol

    Rubie D. C., Nimmo F., Melosh J., 2007, in Schubert G., ed., , Vol. 9, Evolution of the Earth. pp 51--90, @doi 10.1016/B978-044452748-6.00140-1

    2007 doi

  142. [151]

    Springer, @doi 10.1007/978-94-017-7552-6

    Sabadini R., Vermeersen B., Cambiotti G., 2016, Global dynamics of the Earth. Springer, @doi 10.1007/978-94-017-7552-6

    2016 doi

  143. [152]

    Scarsdale N., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad73cf , 168, 276

    2024 doi

  144. [153]

    T., 2018, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences] 10.1098/rsta.2018.0109 , 376, 20180109

    Schaefer L., Elkins-Tanton L. T., 2018, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences] 10.1098/rsta.2018.0109 , 376, 20180109

    2018

  145. [154]

    E., Young E

    Schlichting H. E., Young E. D., 2022, Chemical equilibrium between Cores , Mantles , and Atmospheres of Super - Earths and Sub - Neptunes , and Implications for their Compositions , Interiors and Evolution , http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10405

    2022 arXiv

  146. [155]

    N., Schubert G., 1988, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90001-2 , 75, 187

    Segatz M., Spohn T., Ross M. N., Schubert G., 1988, @doi [Icarus] 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90001-2 , 75, 187

    1988 doi

  147. [156]

    L., Sossi P

    Seidler F. L., Sossi P. A., Grimm S. L., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450546 , 691, A159

    2024 doi

  148. [157]

    H., Pandis S

    Seinfeld J. H., Pandis S. N., 2006, Atmospheric chemistry and physics : from air pollution to climate change, 2nd ed. edn. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J

    2006

  149. [158]

    Z., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b82 , 961, 22

    Seligman D. Z., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b82 , 961, 22

    2024 doi

  150. [159]

    Selsis F., Leconte J., Turbet M., Chaverot G., Bolmont A., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-06258-3 , 620, 287

    2023 doi

  151. [160]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [Geoscientific Model Development] 10.5194/gmd-16-5601-2023 , 16, 5601

    Sergeev D. E., et al., 2023, @doi [Geoscientific Model Development] 10.5194/gmd-16-5601-2023 , 16, 5601

    2023 doi

  152. [161]

    J., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad206e , 962, L8

    Shorttle O., Jordan S., Nicholls H., Lichtenberg T., Bower D. J., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad206e , 962, L8

    2024 doi

  153. [162]

    J., Hirschmann M

    Sim S. J., Hirschmann M. M., Hier-Majumder S., 2024, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets] https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JE008346 , 129, e2024JE008346

    2024 doi

  154. [163]

    A., Burnham A

    Sossi P. A., Burnham A. D., Badro J., Lanzirotti A., Newville M., ONeill H. S., 2020, @doi [Science Advances] 10.1126/sciadv.abd1387 , 6, eabd1387

    2020 doi

  155. [164]

    A., Tollan P

    Sossi P. A., Tollan P. M. E., Badro J., Bower D. J., 2023, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117894 , 601, 117894

    2023

  156. [165]

    C., Sills A., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/87 , 776, 87

    Spada F., Demarque P., Kim Y. C., Sills A., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/87 , 776, 87

    2013 doi

  157. [166]

    Steffen W., et al., 2018, @doi [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences] 10.1073/pnas.1810141115 , 115, 8252

    2018 doi

  158. [167]

    Stixrude L., Lithgow-Bertelloni C., 2005, @doi [Geophysical Journal International] 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02642.x , 162, 610

    2005 arXiv

  159. [168]

    S., Dalou C., Lichtenberg T., 2023, @doi [Frontiers in Earth Science] 10.3389/feart.2023.1159412 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023FrEaS..1159412S 11, 1159412

    Suer T.-A., Jackson C., Grewal D. S., Dalou C., Lichtenberg T., 2023, @doi [Frontiers in Earth Science] 10.3389/feart.2023.1159412 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023FrEaS..1159412S 11, 1159412

    2023

  160. [169]

    M., Elkins-Tanton L

    Tikoo S. M., Elkins-Tanton L. T., 2017, @doi [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences] 10.1098/rsta.2015.0394 , 375, 20150394

    2017

  161. [170]

    Tsai S.-M., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-05902-2 , 617, 483

    2023 doi

  162. [172]

    T., 2020b, @doi [Space Science Reviews] 10.1007/s11214-020-00719-1 , 216, 100

    Turbet M., Bolmont E., Bourrier V., Demory B.-O., Leconte J., Owen J., Wolf E. T., 2020b, @doi [Space Science Reviews] 10.1007/s11214-020-00719-1 , 216, 100

    doi

  163. [173]

    S., Tennyson J., Yurchenko S

    Underwood D. S., Tennyson J., Yurchenko S. N., Huang X., Schwenke D. W., Lee T. J., Clausen S., Fateev A., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw849 , 459, 3890

    2016 doi

  164. [174]

    H., Binks A

    Varga A., Kastner J. H., Binks A. S., Guenther H. M., Murphy S. J., 2025, The Age and High Energy Environment of the Very Young Transiting Exoplanet TOI 1227b ( @eprint arXiv 2506.04440 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04440

    2025 arXiv

  165. [175]

    R., Decin L., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/77 , 830, 77

    Venot O., Rocchetto M., Carl S., Hashim A. R., Decin L., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/77 , 830, 77

    2016 doi

  166. [176]

    M., Haldemann J., Ronco M

    Venturini J., Guilera O. M., Haldemann J., Ronco M. P., Mordasini C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643L...1V 643, L1

    2020 doi

  167. [177]

    Vitense E., 1953, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953ZA.....32..135V 32, 135

    1953

  168. [178]

    M., Hobbs P

    Wallace J. M., Hobbs P. V., 2006, in Wallace J. M., Hobbs P. V., eds, , Atmospheric Science (Second Edition), second edition edn, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 271--311, @doi https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-732951-2.50012-0 , https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii...

    2006 doi

  169. [179]

    S., Lineweaver C

    Wang H. S., Lineweaver C. H., Ireland T. R., 2018, @doi [Icarus] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.08.024 , 299, 460

    2018 doi

  170. [180]

    H., 1985, @doi [Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences] https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001221 , 13, 201

    Warren P. H., 1985, @doi [Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences] https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001221 , 13, 201

    1985

  171. [181]

    J., Donahue T

    Watson A. J., Donahue T. M., Ker J. C. G. W., 1981, Icarus, 48, 150

    1981

  172. [182]

    J., Louden T., Bourrier V., Ehrenreich D., Gillon M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465L..74W 465, L74

    Wheatley P. J., Louden T., Bourrier V., Ehrenreich D., Gillon M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465L..74W 465, L74

    2017 doi

  173. [183]

    Wienbruch U., Spohn T., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(95)00039-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995P&SS...43.1045W 43, 1045

    1995 doi

  174. [184]

    S., Bower D

    Wolf A. S., Bower D. J., 2018, @doi [Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.02.004 , 278, 59

    2018 doi

  175. [185]

    Wordsworth R., Kreidberg L., 2022, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632 , 60, 159

    2022 doi

  176. [186]

    D., Pierrehumbert R

    Wordsworth R. D., Pierrehumbert R. T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778..154W 778, 154

    2013 doi

  177. [187]

    C., 2008, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110525 , 46, 339

    Wyatt M. C., 2008, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110525 , 46, 339

    2008 arXiv

  178. [188]

    F., 1979, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/279767a0 , 279, 767

    Yoder C. F., 1979, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/279767a0 , 279, 767

    1979 doi

  179. [189]

    Yoshida T., Terada N., Kuramoto K., 2024, @doi [Progress in Earth and Planetary Science] 10.1186/s40645-024-00666-3 , 11, 59

    2024 doi

  180. [190]

    J., Catling D

    Zahnle K. J., Catling D. C., 2017, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7846 , 843, 122

    2017 doi

  181. [191]

    J., Lupu R., Dobrovolskis A., Sleep N

    Zahnle K. J., Lupu R., Dobrovolskis A., Sleep N. H., 2015, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.058 , 427, 74

    2015 doi

  182. [192]

    Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 79--86, @doi 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_500 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_500

    Zhou T., 2013, Bifurcation. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 79--86, @doi 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_500 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_500

    2013 doi

  183. [193]

    Zhou L., Ma B., Wang Y., Zhu Y., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8fe9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164..203Z 164, 203

    2022 doi

  184. [194]

    Zhou L., Ma B., Wang Y.-H., Zhu Y.-N., 2023, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/acaceb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RAA....23b5011Z 23, 025011

    2023 doi

  185. [195]

    Zieba S., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-06232-z

    2023 doi

  186. [196]

    C., Nimmo F., Eiler J., Hofmann A

    de Kleer K., Hughes E. C., Nimmo F., Eiler J., Hofmann A. E., Luszcz-Cook S., Mandt K., 2024, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.adj0625 , 0, eadj0625

    2024 doi

  187. [197]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.