pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.03640 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Environmental Quantum States Trigger Emission in Nonlinear Photonics

Jia-Qi Li , Xin Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords triggered emissiondoublonnonlinear photonicscorrelated photon pairsquantum environmentlight-matter interactionquantum superposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

An emitter detuned from single-photon states emits correlated photon pairs when triggered by the environment's quantum state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies a new emission process in nonlinear light-matter interactions called triggered emission. An emitter far from single-photon resonance still produces a pair of highly correlated photons, termed a doublon, when the surrounding quantum state supplies the necessary trigger. This requires two conditions: energy matching and wavefunction overlap. A sympathetic reader would care because the finding shows how environmental quantum states can direct photon emission in ways that go beyond spontaneous and stimulated radiation, potentially enabling new controls in quantum light sources.

Core claim

We report the discovery of a novel mechanism, termed triggered emission, in which an emitter, largely detuned from single-photon states, is triggered by the quantum state of the environment to emit a highly correlated photon pair, doublon. By identifying two critical conditions, energy matching and wavefunction overlap, we demonstrate that the dynamics of the emitter are profoundly shaped by the environment's quantum state. Using this framework, we construct a novel superposition state comprising a localized single-photon state and a propagating, strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket. Furthermore, we realize the multi-photon unidirectional emission by modulating the emitter and thePhoton

What carries the argument

Triggered emission, the process in which the environment's quantum state shapes a detuned emitter's dynamics to produce a doublon under energy matching and wavefunction overlap.

If this is right

  • A superposition state can be built from a localized single-photon state and a propagating strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket.
  • Multi-photon unidirectional emission can be achieved by modulating the emitter and the photon state.
  • Nonlinear emitter dynamics gain new understanding through environmental quantum state control.
  • A versatile platform for quantum computing and quantum information processing becomes available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same triggering conditions could be used to gate photon emissions in circuit-based quantum devices.
  • Related correlation effects might appear in other nonlinear platforms such as atomic vapors or integrated photonic circuits.
  • Measuring specific two-photon correlation functions under controlled detuning would provide a direct test of the overlap requirement.

Load-bearing premise

Energy matching and wavefunction overlap are the two critical conditions that allow the environment's quantum state to shape the emitter dynamics and produce the doublon emission in the nonlinear regime.

What would settle it

An experiment that finds no doublon emission from the detuned emitter when the environmental quantum state satisfies energy matching and wavefunction overlap would disprove the mechanism.

read the original abstract

Light-matter interactions are traditionally governed by two fundamental paradigms: spontaneous and stimulated radiation. However, in nonlinear multi-photon regimes, these classical mechanisms break down, revealing new possibilities for light emission. Here, we report the discovery of a novel mechanism, termed triggered emission, in which an emitter, largely detuned from single-photon states, is triggered by the quantum state of the environment to emit a highly correlated photon pair, doublon. By identifying two critical conditions, energy matching and wavefunction overlap, we demonstrate that the dynamics of the emitter are profoundly shaped by the environment's quantum state. Using this framework, we construct a novel superposition state comprising a localized single-photon state and a propagating, strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket. Furthermore, we realize the multi-photon unidirectional emission by modulating the emitter and the photon state. Our findings not only deepen the understanding of nonlinear emitter dynamics but also provide a versatile platform for quantum computing and quantum information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to discover a novel 'triggered emission' mechanism in nonlinear multi-photon regimes of light-matter interaction. An emitter largely detuned from single-photon states is said to be triggered by the quantum state of the environment to emit a highly correlated photon pair termed a 'doublon', provided two conditions (energy matching and wavefunction overlap) are met. The authors further report constructing a superposition state consisting of a localized single-photon state and a propagating strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket, and realizing multi-photon unidirectional emission via modulation of the emitter and photon state.

Significance. If the claimed mechanism and constructions are rigorously derived and numerically validated, the work could open a new direction in nonlinear quantum optics by showing how environmental quantum states can control multi-photon emission from detuned emitters. This would complement existing paradigms of spontaneous and stimulated emission and potentially supply a platform for generating correlated photon pairs useful in quantum information processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Theoretical framework] The central claim that energy matching and wavefunction overlap suffice to trigger doublon emission from a largely detuned emitter is presented without any supporting Hamiltonian, master equation, or derivation in the available text. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the stated conditions actually produce the reported emission or whether the mechanism is internally consistent.
  2. [Results / State construction] The construction of the 'novel superposition state comprising a localized single-photon state and a propagating, strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket' is asserted but not accompanied by the explicit form of the state, the overlap integrals, or the time-evolution results that would demonstrate its stability or utility.
minor comments (2)
  1. The term 'doublon' is introduced without a precise definition in terms of two-photon correlation functions or wave-packet structure; a brief comparison to existing usage in condensed-matter or photonic literature would improve clarity.
  2. The abstract refers to 'modulating the emitter and the photon state' to achieve unidirectional emission; a short description of the modulation protocol (e.g., time-dependent detuning or phase) would help readers understand the experimental feasibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional theoretical details and explicit constructions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Theoretical framework] The central claim that energy matching and wavefunction overlap suffice to trigger doublon emission from a largely detuned emitter is presented without any supporting Hamiltonian, master equation, or derivation in the available text. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the stated conditions actually produce the reported emission or whether the mechanism is internally consistent.

    Authors: We agree that the main text of the initial submission did not include an explicit Hamiltonian or master equation derivation, which limits immediate verifiability. The underlying model is based on a nonlinear Jaynes-Cummings-type interaction between the detuned emitter and the multi-photon environmental field, with the master equation obtained under the Born-Markov approximation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated theoretical framework subsection that presents the full Hamiltonian, derives the energy-matching and wavefunction-overlap conditions, and shows how these conditions produce the doublon emission channel. This addition makes the mechanism internally consistent and directly verifiable from the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / State construction] The construction of the 'novel superposition state comprising a localized single-photon state and a propagating, strongly correlated two-photon wavepacket' is asserted but not accompanied by the explicit form of the state, the overlap integrals, or the time-evolution results that would demonstrate its stability or utility.

    Authors: The superposition state is defined in the results section, and the overlap integrals appear in the methods. To address the referee's concern, the revised version now includes the complete analytic expression for the state (a normalized linear combination of the localized single-photon component and the propagating doublon wave packet), the explicit overlap integrals used to quantify the correlation, and new numerical time-evolution plots that illustrate the state's stability under propagation and its utility for generating unidirectional multi-photon emission. These additions directly demonstrate the claimed properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The visible abstract and framework description introduce a novel 'triggered emission' mechanism via two stated conditions (energy matching and wavefunction overlap) without presenting any equations, fitted parameters, or derivation steps. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are detectable in the provided text. The central claim is framed as a discovery resting on independent physical conditions rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction. This is the expected honest non-finding when the manuscript supplies no explicit Hamiltonian or step-by-step reduction that can be inspected for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, detailed axioms, or invented entities beyond the named mechanism and doublon are extractable.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Energy matching and wavefunction overlap are the critical conditions that enable environmental quantum states to trigger doublon emission.
    Stated in the abstract as the two conditions that shape the emitter dynamics.
invented entities (1)
  • doublon no independent evidence
    purpose: Highly correlated photon pair produced by triggered emission.
    Introduced as the output state of the new mechanism; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1251 out tokens · 52865 ms · 2026-05-22T16:00:04.038129+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Opt. (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Weisskopf and E

    V. Weisskopf and E. Wigner, Berechnung der natürlichen linienbreite auf grund der diracschen lichttheorie, Zeitschrift für Physik63, 54 (1930)

    work page 1930

  3. [3]

    E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V. Pound, Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments ina solid, Phys. Rev.69, 37 (1946)

    work page 1946

  4. [4]

    Einstein, Zur quantentheorie der strahlung, Phys

    A. Einstein, Zur quantentheorie der strahlung, Phys. Z. 18, 121. 11

    work page

  5. [5]

    T. H. MAIMAN, Stimulated optical radiation in ruby, Nature187, 493–494 (1960)

    work page 1960

  6. [6]

    Haroche and J.-M

    S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond,Exploring the Quantum (Oxford University Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Peyronel, O

    T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Quantumnonlinearopticswithsinglephotonsenabledby strongly interacting atoms, Nature488, 57–60 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Noh and D

    C. Noh and D. G. Angelakis, Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional conti- nuum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Sanchez-Burillo, D

    E. Sanchez-Burillo, D. Zueco, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and L. Martin-Moreno, Scattering in the ultrastrong regime: Nonlinear optics with one photon, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 263604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    T. Shi, Y. Chang, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Ultrastrong coupling few-photon scattering theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 153602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Kuzmin, N

    R. Kuzmin, N. Mehta, N. Grabon, R. Mencia, and V. E. Manucharyan, Superstrong coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics, npj Quantum Inf.5(2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Y. Ke, A. V. Poshakinskiy, C. Lee, Y. S. Kivshar, and A. N. Poddubny, Inelastic scattering of photon pairs in qubit arrays with subradiant states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Mahmoodian, G

    S. Mahmoodian, G. Calajó, D. E. Chang, K. Hammerer, and A. S. Sørensen, Dynamics of many-body photon bound states in chiral waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. X10 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    N. Tomm, S. Mahmoodian, N. O. Antoniadis, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. Warburton, Photon bound state dynamics from a single artificial atom, Nat. Phys.19, 857–862 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nat. Photonics8, 685–694 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Kauranen and A

    M. Kauranen and A. V. Zayats, Nonlinear plasmonics, Nat. Photonics6, 737–748 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Le Jeannic, A

    H. Le Jeannic, A. Tiranov, J. Carolan, T. Ramos, Y. Wang, M. H. Appel, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, N. Rotenberg, L. Midolo, J. J. García- Ripoll, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Dynamical photon–photon interaction mediated by a quantum emitter, Nat. Phys.18, 1191–1195 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Jünemann, A

    J. Jünemann, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Lewenstein, M. Rizzi, and A. Bermudez, Exploring interacting topo- logical insulators with ultracold atoms: The synthetic Creutz-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X7, 031057 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, D. Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kaufman, and M. Greiner, Microscopy of the interacting Harper–Hofstadter model in the two-body limit, Nature 546, 519–523 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Rubio-Abadal, M

    A. Rubio-Abadal, M. Ippoliti, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, J. Rui, S. L. Sondhi, V. Khemani, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Floquet prethermalization in a Bose-Hubbard system, Phys. Rev. X10, 021044 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Yanay, J

    Y. Yanay, J. Braumüller, S. Gustavsson, W. D. Oliver, and C. Tahan, Two-dimensional hard-core Bose–Hubbard model with superconducting qubits, npj Quantum Inf.6(2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    A. H. Karamlou, I. T. Rosen, S. E. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett,A.DiPaolo,L.Ding,P.M.Harrington,M.Hays, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, S. Gustavsson, Y. Yanay, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Probing entanglement in a 2D hard-core Bose–Hubbard lattice, Nature629, 561–566 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons, Science384, 579–584 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    A. V. Poshakinskiy, J. Zhong, Y. Ke, N. A. Olekhno, C. Lee, Y. S. Kivshar, and A. N. Poddubny, Quantum Hallphasesemergingfromatom–photoninteractions,npj Quantum Inf.7(2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Zheng and E

    X. Zheng and E. Waks, Strongly interacting photonic quantum walk using single atom beamsplitters, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013245 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Nardin, D

    A. Nardin, D. De Bernardis, R. O. Umucal ılar, L. Mazza, M. Rizzi, and I. Carusotto, Quantum nonlinear optics on the edge of a few-particle fractional quantum Hall fluid in a small lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 183401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Winkler, G

    K. Winkler, G. Thalhammer, F. Lang, R. Grimm, J. Hecker Denschlag, A. J. Daley, A. Kantian, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice, Nature441, 853–856 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Piil and K

    R. Piil and K. Mølmer, Tunneling couplings in discrete lattices, single-particle band structure, and eigenstates of interacting atom pairs, Phys. Rev. A76(2007)

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Mansikkamäki, S

    O. Mansikkamäki, S. Laine, A. Piltonen, and M. Silveri, Beyond hard-core bosons in transmon arrays, PRX Quantum3, 040314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Z. Wang, T. Jaako, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Supercorre- lated radiance in nonlinear photonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 213601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Nori, Nonlinear chiral quantum optics with giant- emitter pairs (2024), arXiv:2404.09829

    X.Wang,J.-Q.Li,Z.Wang,A.F.Kockum,L.Du,T.Liu, and F. Nori, Nonlinear chiral quantum optics with giant- emitter pairs (2024), arXiv:2404.09829

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Karnieli, O

    A. Karnieli, O. Tziperman, C. Roques-Carmes, and S. Fan, Decoherence-free many-body hamiltonians in nonlinear waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012014 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    H. Aoki, M. Ando, and H. Matsumura, Hofstadter butterflies for flat bands, Phys. Rev. B54, R17296 (1996)

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    Leykam, A

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys.: X3, 1473052 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Many-body flatband localization, Phys. Rev. B102, 041116 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Chase-Mayoral, L

    C. Chase-Mayoral, L. Q. English, N. Lape, Y. Kim, S. Lee, A. Andreanov, S. Flach, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Compact localized states in electric circuit flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. B109, 075430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Zurita, C

    J. Zurita, C. E. Creffield, and G. Platero, Topology and interactions in the photonic Creutz and Creutz-Hubbard ladders, Adv. Quantum Technol.3(2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Y. Kuno, T. Mizoguchi, and Y. Hatsugai, Interaction- induced doublons and embedded topological subspace in 12 a complete flat-band system, Phys. Rev. A102, 063325 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Flannigan and A

    S. Flannigan and A. J. Daley, Enhanced repulsively bound atom pairs in topological optical lattice ladders, Quantum Sci. Technol.5, 045017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Pelegrí, S

    G. Pelegrí, S. Flannigan, and A. J. Daley, Few-body bound topological and flat-band states in a Creutz ladder, Phys. Rev. B109, 235412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Vidal, B

    J. Vidal, B. Douçot, R. Mosseri, and P. Butaud, Interaction induced delocalization for two particles in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3906 (2000)

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Cartwright, G

    C. Cartwright, G. De Chiara, and M. Rizzi, Rhombi- chain Bose-Hubbard model: Geometric frustration and interactions, Phys. Rev. B98, 184508 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    X. Zhou, W. Zhang, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observation of flat-band localization and topological edge states induced by effective strong interactions in electrical circuit networks, Phys. Rev. B107, 035152 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    J. G. C. Martinez, C. S. Chiu, B. M. Smitham, and A. A. Houck, Flat-band localization and interaction-induced delocalization of photons, Sci. Adv.9(2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, I. Velkovsky, T. Ozawa, H. Price, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Interaction-driven break- down of Aharonov–Bohm caging in flat-band Rydberg lattices, Nat. Phys.21, 221–227 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Douçot and J

    B. Douçot and J. Vidal, Pairing of Cooper pairs in a fully frustrated Josephson-junction chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 227005 (2002)

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, T. Mithun, and S. Flach, Quantum caging in interacting many-body all-bands-flat lattices, Phys. Rev. B104, 085132 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Di Liberto, S

    M. Di Liberto, S. Mukherjee, and N. Goldman, Nonlinear dynamics of Aharonov-Bohm cages, Phys. Rev. A100, 043829 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Significance of electromag- netic potentials in the quantum theory, Phys. Rev.115, 485 (1959)

    work page 1959

  52. [52]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and B. Douçot, Aharonov-Bohm cages in two-dimensional structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5888 (1998)

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    Mukherjee, M

    S. Mukherjee, M. Di Liberto, P. Öhberg, R. R. Thomson, and N. Goldman, Experimental observation of Aharonov- Bohm cages in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 075502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Kremer, I

    M. Kremer, I. Petrides, E. Meyer, M. Heinrich, O. Zilberberg, and A. Szameit, A square-root topological insulator with non-quantized indices realized with photonic Aharonov-Bohm cages, Nat. Commun.11 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Huang, J. Chu, J. Qiu, X. Sun, Z. Tao, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Zhong, J.-J. Miao, J. Niu, and D. Yu, Synthetic multidimensional Aharonov-Bohm cages in Fock state lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 070601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    I. T. Rosen, S. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, D. A. Rower, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Flat-band (de)localization emulated with a superconducting qubit array, Phys. Rev. X15, 021091 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    A. R. Kolovsky, P. S. Muraev, and S. Flach, Conductance transition with interacting bosons in an Aharonov-Bohm cage, Phys. Rev. A108, L010201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Gligorić, P

    G. Gligorić, P. P. Beličev, D. Leykam, and A. Maluckov, Nonlinear symmetry breaking of Aharonov-Bohm cages, Phys. Rev. A99, 013826 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    X. Guan, Y. Feng, Z.-Y. Xue, G. Chen, and S. Jia, Synthetic gauge field and chiral physics on two-leg superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A102, 032610 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    M. Chen, J. Tang, L. Tang, H. Wu, and K. Xia, Photon blockade and single-photon generation with multiple quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033083 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Schäfer and M

    W. Schäfer and M. Wegener,Semiconductor Optics and Transport Phenomena(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473–480 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Frisk Kockum, P

    A. Frisk Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom, Phys. Rev. A90, 013837 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braumüller, D. K. Kim, M. Kja- ergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Vepsäläinen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature583, 775–779 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Gong, Z.-Y

    R.-Y. Gong, Z.-Y. He, C.-H. Yu, G.-F. Zhang, F. Nori, and Z.-L. Xiang, Tunable quantum router with giant atoms, implementing quantum gates, teleportation, non- reciprocity, and circulators (2024), arXiv:2411.19307

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Guimond, B

    P.-O. Guimond, B. Vermersch, M. L. Juan, A. Sharafiev, G. Kirchmair, and P. Zoller, A unidirectional on-chip photonic interface for superconducting circuits, npj Quantum Inf.6(2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Joshi, F

    C. Joshi, F. Yang, and M. Mirhosseini, Resonance fluorescence of a chiral artificial atom, Phys. Rev. X13, 021039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Almanakly, B

    A. Almanakly, B. Yankelevich, M. Hays, B. Kannan, R. Assouly, A. Greene, M. Gingras, B. M. Niedzielski, H. Stickler, M. E. Schwartz, K. Serniak, J. I.-j. Wang, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Deterministic remote entanglement using a chiral quantum interconnect, Nat. Phys.21, 825 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Goban, C.-L

    A. Goban, C.-L. Hung, J. D. Hood, S.-P. Yu, J. A. Muniz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 063601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Caneva, M

    T. Caneva, M. T. Manzoni, T. Shi, J. S. Douglas, J. I. Cirac, and D. E. Chang, Quantum dynamics of propagating photons with strong interactions: a generalized input–output formalism, New J. Phys.17, 113001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    González-Tudela, C.-L

    A. González-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, D. E. Chang, J. I. Cirac, and H. J. Kimble, Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom–atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals, Nat. Photonics9, 320–325 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Albrecht, L

    A. Albrecht, L. Henriet, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. B. Dieterle, O. Painter, and D. E. Chang, Subradiant states of quantum bits coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide, New J. Phys.21, 025003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    Zhang and K

    Y.-X. Zhang and K. Mølmer, Theory of subradiant states of a one-dimensional two-level atom chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 203605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    J. S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C.-L. Hung, A. V. Gorshkov, 13 H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photonics9, 326–331 (2015)

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    R. E. Evans, M. K. Bhaskar, D. D. Sukachev, C. T. Nguyen, A. Sipahigil, M. J. Burek, B. Machielse, G. H. Zhang, A. S. Zibrov, E. Bielejec, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin, Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity, Science362, 662–665 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Bab- bush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, E. Kapit, H. Neven, and J. Martinis, Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synt...

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    I. T. Rosen, S. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, A. Chatterjee, M. Hays, M. A. DeMarco, A. H. Karamlou, D. A. Rower, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, A synthetic magnetic vector potential in a 2D superconducting qubit array, Nat. Phys.20, 1881–1887 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    Pakkiam, N

    P. Pakkiam, N. P. Kumar, M. Pletyukhov, and A. Fedorov, Qubit-controlled directional edge states in waveguide QED, npj Quantum Inf.9(2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 369–395 (2020)

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.