Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 58 references

Quantum geometry and magnon Hall transport in an altermagnet

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in a two-dimensional altermagnet, the magnon thermal Hall and spin Nernst conductivities are proportional to the altermagnetic parameter $(J_2-J_2')$, making them direct probes of altermagnetism.

desk verdict A clean new symplectic QGT for two-band magnons plus a transport prediction that is worth checking; the only load-bearing gap is Eq. (28). read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04726 v2 pith:SQKSWG2Y submitted 2025-05-07 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mech

Erlend Sylju{aa}sen , Alireza Qaiumzadeh , Asle Sudb{o} This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords altermagnetismmagnonthermalHalleffectspinNernstquantumgeometrictensorbosonicBogoliubovHamiltonianBerrycurvatureLieblatticeDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the magnon thermal Hall conductivity and the magnon spin Nernst conductivity in a two-dimensional altermagnet are direct measures of the altermagnetic splitting: both vanish when the altermagnetic parameter $J_2-J_2'$ is zero, and to leading order the spin Nernst signal is proportional to $J_2-J_2'$ while the thermal Hall signal is proportional to $B(J_2-J_2')$. To reach this result the authors derive an analytic expression for the quantum geometric tensor of two-band bosonic Bogoliubov Hamiltonians, based on the pseudo-unitary group structure of the bosonic diagonalization. They apply it to a minimal Lieb-lattice altermagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and compute the conductivities as functions of temperature and splitting. Because the altermagnetic splitting can be tuned by strain, the paper proposes these bulk transport signals as an experimental probe of altermagnetism in insulating magnets such as $\mathrm{La_2O_3Mn_2Se_2}$.

What carries the argument

The key object is the symplectic quantum geometric tensor (SQGT), defined by replacing the usual eigenprojectors with pseudo-orthogonal projectors onto eigenstates of the dynamical matrix $D=\sigma_z H$. The paper shows that for any two-band bosonic Bogoliubov Hamiltonian, the LR pseudo-orthogonal projectors can be written as $P_\pm=\frac{1}{2}(1_2\pm \hat{d}\cdot K)$, where $\hat{d}$ is a unit vector on a Lorentzian two-sheeted hyperboloid built from the Hamiltonian coefficients. This yields closed-form expressions for the symplectic quantum metric and the symplectic Berry curvature, and it explains why the topology is trivial: the hyperbolic sheet is contractible. The same $P_\pm$ feed the linear-response integrals for heat and spin currents.

What would settle it

A direct numerical check is to compute the thermal Hall and spin Nernst conductivities from the Kubo formulas on the original two-band Hamiltonian without the doubling step; Eq. (33) predicts exact zero at $J_2=J_2'$, so any nonzero result from that calculation would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a direct analytic link between altermagnetic splitting and bosonic Hall transport. For the Lieb-lattice model, the magnon Berry curvature is odd under a 90-degree rotation, so its Brillouin-zone integral vanishes and the bands are topologically trivial; nevertheless the distribution-function-weighted integrals that give the conductivities do not vanish. Expanding those integrals for small splitting gives $\alpha_{xy}\propto (J_2-J_2')$ and $\kappa_{xy}\propto B(J_2-J_2')$, so a nonzero altermagnetic parameter is necessary and sufficient (within the model) for both transverse responses at any temperature. The same analysis shows the Berry curvature itself is independent of the altermagnetic parameter and depends only on the sum $J_2+J_2'$, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya coupling, and the anisotropy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the linear-response formulas derived for particle-hole symmetric Hamiltonians remain valid after the bosonic Hamiltonian is rewritten in a doubled Nambu form; if that doubling changes the physical heat and spin currents, the predicted dependence on the altermagnetic parameter would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, measuring a finite magnon spin Nernst signal at zero magnetic field in an insulating antiferromagnet would indicate altermagnetic splitting even when the magnon bands are not directly resolved.
  • The thermal Hall conductivity in the same material should require a magnetic field and be proportional to $B(J_2-J_2')$ at leading order, giving a way to separate the altermagnetic parameter from other couplings.
  • Because the conductivity formulas vanish identically at $J_2=J_2'$, the standard square-lattice antiferromagnet with only $J_1$ and one next-nearest-neighbor coupling is predicted to show no magnon Hall or Nernst effect from this mechanism.
  • Strain tuning of $J_2-J_2'$ should change the conductivities in a predictable way, which the paper suggests could be tested in layered altermagnetic insulators such as $\mathrm{La_2O_3Mn_2Se_2}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the doubling of the Nambu array in fact preserves the physical currents, the proportionality $\alpha_{xy}\propto(J_2-J_2')$ is probably generic for any collinear two-sublattice antiferromagnet with d-wave anisotropic couplings, not only the Lieb lattice.
  • Since the Berry curvature is independent of the altermagnetic parameter while the conductivities depend on it through the distribution functions, a combined measurement of the band-resolved Berry curvature and the transport coefficients could isolate the coupling difference.
  • A natural numerical extension is exact diagonalization of finite clusters with the same parameters; computing the Hall response without assuming particle-hole symmetry would test the load-bearing linear-response step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a symplectic quantum geometric tensor (SQGT) for two-band bosonic Bogoliubov Hamiltonians, exploiting the pseudo-unitary (U(1,1)) structure of the Bogoliubov–Valatin transformation. The authors derive closed-form expressions for the symplectic quantum metric and Berry curvature in terms of the dynamical vector, Eqs. (17)–(21), and show that the band topology is trivial because the dynamical unit vector maps to a contractible hyperbolic sheet. They then apply this framework to a minimal Lieb lattice altermagnet, deriving the magnon bands and an analytic Berry curvature, Eq. (27). Using linear-response formulas from the literature (Eq. (28)), they compute the magnon thermal Hall and spin Nernst conductivities and analyze their temperature and altermagnetic-splitting dependence. The central result, Eq. (33), is that to leading order the spin Nernst conductivity is proportional to (J2'–J2) and the thermal Hall conductivity is proportional to B(J2'–J2), suggesting these transport signals as experimental probes of altermagnetism.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper makes two valuable contributions. First, it provides an elegant and fully analytic derivation of the quantum geometric tensor for two-band bosonic Bogoliubov systems, which is a useful tool for future studies of magnon geometry and topology. Second, it predicts a clear, falsifiable dependence of the magnon thermal Hall and spin Nernst conductivities on the altermagnetic splitting, offering a potential experimental route to detect altermagnetism in insulating magnets. The derivation is self-contained up to the transport formulas, no parameters are fitted to the target conductivities, and the leading-order proportionality in Eq. (33) is obtained analytically. The suggestion of La2O3Mn2Se2 as a candidate platform is concrete and reasonable, though quantitative predictions for specific materials are not provided.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III B, Eq. (28)] The two transport formulas in Eq. (28) are imported from Refs. [42,43,45] without derivation, despite being the load-bearing step that converts the microscopic Hamiltonian into the computed conductivities. The manuscript itself flags this in Sec. III B: it states that Eq. (24) is not particle-hole symmetric and must be rewritten in that form by doubling the Nambu array, after which Ref. [45] gives Eq. (28). This step is not merely a technicality: the sign structure of Eq. (28) (a difference of c1 terms for alpha_xy and a sum of c2 terms for kappa_xy) is essential for the leading-order results in Eq. (33). If the sign of the lower-band contribution in Eq. (28b) were reversed, the leading term in kappa_xy would be quadratic in the altermagnetic splitting rather than linear in B(J2'-J2), and if Eq. (28a) carried a plus sign, alpha_xy would be quadratic and vanish at linear order. The doubling procedure must also handle the c-number shift from bosonic commutation relations and the sign of the lower-band Berry curvature. The authors should provide a derivation of Eq. (28) for the doubled Hamiltonian, or at least a detailed verification that the physical heat and spin current operators are correctly represented and that the sign structure is preserved. Without this, the central claim is conditional on an unverified input.
  2. [Sec. III B, Eq. (33)] The expansion leading to Eq. (33) is described as being 'to second order in delta', but the displayed results are first order in (J2'-J2) for alpha_xy and first order in B(J2'-J2) for kappa_xy. The authors should clarify the small parameters in the expansion and show the terms to the order actually retained. In particular, the role of the magnetic-field part of delta in Eq. (26a) deserves explicit discussion: the alpha_xy result in Eq. (33a) survives at B=0, but at finite B the delta in Eq. (26a) also contains B, and the authors should show that the B-only contribution to alpha_xy integrates to zero due to the odd symmetry of F_xy, as is implicitly assumed. This clarification is important for a reader to understand the precise regime of validity of Eq. (33).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III B, numerical integration] The description of the numerical integration is too vague: 'An adaptive numerical integration method is used' without specifying the quadrature scheme, grid density, or convergence criteria. For reproducibility of Figs. 5 and 6, the authors should provide details of the method and an estimate of the numerical uncertainty.
  2. [Eq. (33a) vs. Fig. 6] There is a sign inconsistency in the notation for the altermagnetic parameter: Eq. (33a) and the text around Eq. (26a) use (J2'-J2), while the x-axis of Fig. 6 is labeled (J2 - J2')/J1. The sign is arbitrary, but the manuscript should be internally consistent.
  3. [Sec. III B, paragraph after Eq. (28)] The sentence 'Both conductivities vanish in the low and high temperature limits when delta|B=0 = 0' should be qualified: at moderate temperatures, Eq. (33) shows that kappa_xy also vanishes when J2'=J2 even if B is finite. This is clear from the figures, but the text could state it explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. II B 1, Eq. (18)] The claim that the symplectic quantum metric 'does not seem to diverge in regions with crossings or overlaps of the two excitation energies' is made for the two-band case; the same statement is later repeated for the Berry curvature. It would be helpful to note explicitly that this is a property of the symplectic (LR) QGT and contrasts with the conventional QGT, as the authors do later.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the J2-J2' dependence of the conductivities is a computed Taylor expansion, not a fitted or self-referential input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The input is the microscopic spin Hamiltonian (22), with the altermagnetic splitting delta defined in Eq. (26a); the outputs are the transport coefficients evaluated from Eq. (28), which are imported from external linear-response literature (Refs. [42,43,45]), not derived from the paper's own target result. The claimed proportionality to (J2-J2') follows from an explicit Taylor expansion of the occupation-function factors around the small splitting delta: Eq. (33) expresses alpha_xy and kappa_xy as (J2'-J2) times computed integrals C_alpha and C_kappa involving p1', p2'', the energy sum omega, and the Berry curvature F+_xy. No parameter is fitted to the conductivities, and the conductivities are not used to define the altermagnetic parameter. Self-citations to Refs. [34,35] supply the Lieb-lattice altermagnet model as an input assumption; they do not by themselves establish the transport conclusion, and the transport formulas come from non-overlapping external references. The particle-hole doubling step before Eq. (28) is stated as borrowed from Refs. [17] and [45]; this is a technical dependency that could be a correctness risk if unverified, but it is not a reduction of the paper's conclusion to its own input. No equation is equal by construction to its target, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is deterministic. The five dimensionless parameters are inputs, not fits to any observable. The main external ingredients are linear spin wave theory and the particle-hole symmetrized transport formulas. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • J2/J1 = -0.4
    Dimensionless direct second-neighbor exchange in Table I, taken from the model Refs 34 and 35; not fitted to transport data.
  • J2'/J1 = -0.2
    Dimensionless second-neighbor exchange through the nonmagnetic atom; the altermagnetic splitting is proportional to J2-J2'.
  • K/J1 = 0.1
    Easy-axis anisotropy in Table I, chosen to stabilize Neel order.
  • D/J1 = 0.1
    Nearest-neighbor DMI strength in Table I; required for nonzero Berry curvature.
  • B/(J1 S) = 0.05
    External magnetic field in Table I; required for nonzero thermal Hall conductivity at low temperature.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Leading-order Holstein-Primakoff expansion (Eq 23)
    Linear spin wave theory neglects magnon-magnon interactions and 1/S corrections; adopted in the model.
  • domain assumption Positive definiteness and stability of H, so trH>0 and detH>0 (Sec II A)
    Guarantees real positive excitation energies and a pseudo-unitary diagonalization, restricting the parameter regime.
  • domain assumption Transport formulas for particle-hole symmetric Hamiltonians transfer to the doubled Bogoliubov Hamiltonian (Sec III B)
    Eq (28) is taken from Refs 42, 43, 45; the original Hamiltonian lacks particle-hole symmetry, so doubling is invoked via Ref 17.
  • domain assumption The Lieb lattice spin model with Moriya-rule DMI represents the relevant altermagnet materials (Sec III, Eq 22)
    The minimal model is chosen to match candidate materials; the DMI sign follows from Moriya rules.
  • standard math U(1,1) and Krein formalism, and Frobenius covariant projector expressions (Sec II)
    Standard linear algebra for pseudo-unitary matrices and projectors, used to derive Eq (17).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum geometry and magnon Hall transport in an altermagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SQKSWG2Y

@misc{pith2026250504726,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum geometry and magnon Hall transport in an altermagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SQKSWG2Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04726}
}
read the original abstract

We compute magnon Hall conductivities in a minimal model of a two-dimensional altermagnet. To do so, we derive an analytic expression for the relevant quantum geometric tensor describing two-band bosonic Bogoliubov Hamiltonians, providing insight into the geometric, topological, and transport properties. The magnon thermal Hall and spin Nernst conductivities are shown to directly depend on the altermagnetic parameter, which may serve as an experimental probe of altermagnetism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04726 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the Lorentzian-like dynamical unit vec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A section of a two-dimensional Lieb lattice. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Magnon excitation energies for the Lieb lattice al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Berry curvature for the Lieb lattice altermagnet. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Magnon Hall conductivities as a function of temper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Magnon Hall conductivities as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, Discovery of a metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet kv2se2o, arXiv:2408.00320 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [45]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  3. [1]

    This expression is similar to the conventional quantum metric in Ref

    Quantum metric The symplectic quantum metric G± µν = ReQ± µν is G± µν = 1 4∂µ ˆd·L∂ν ˆd, (18) = 1 4∥d∥2 L " ∂µd·L∂νd− (d·L∂µd)(d·L∂νd) ∥d∥2 L # . This expression is similar to the conventional quantum metric in Ref. [27], but here it is the dynamical unit vector, and not the Hamiltonian unit vector (Bloch vector), that enters the expression. In addition, ...

    work page

  4. [2]

    (21) The magnonic Berry curvature introduced in Ref

    Berry curvature The symplectic Berry curvature F± µν =−2 ImQ± µν is F± µν =∓ 1 2 ˆd· (∂µ ˆd ×∂ν ˆd ) =∓ 1 2∥d∥3 L d· (∂µd ×∂νd). (21) The magnonic Berry curvature introduced in Ref. [ 28] is identical to our definition of the symplectic Berry curva- ture as the imaginary part of the SQGT. Therefore, it correctly captures geometric phase evolution in param...

    work page

  5. [3]

    This can be done by studying the dynamical unit vector ˆd because the pa- rameter dependence of the projection operators is given through this vector

    Topological properties We investigate the topological properties using the previously established framework. This can be done by studying the dynamical unit vector ˆd because the pa- rameter dependence of the projection operators is given through this vector. The Lorentzian norm in Eq. (12) indicates that ˆd lives on a two-sheeted hyperboloid de- fined by...

    work page

  6. [4]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Rossnagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Observation of time-reversal symme...

    work page 2024

  7. [5]

    We divide the magnetic atoms into two magnetic sub- 5 J1, D: J2: J ′ 2: a x y FIG. 2. A section of a two-dimensional Lieb lattice. The magnetic sublattices L1 and L2 are denoted by filled and hollow circles, respectively. nonmagnetic atoms are shown as squares, the lattice spacing is a, and the chosen unit cell is marked by the dashed square. The coupling...

    work page

  8. [6]

    Another promising altermagnet candidate on a Lieb lattice is the correlated insulating d-wave al- termagnet La2O3Mn2Se2 [36]

    and Rb1−δV2Te2O [7], for which our minimal model appears to be a relevant description, has recently been reported using spin-resolved angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Another promising altermagnet candidate on a Lieb lattice is the correlated insulating d-wave al- termagnet La2O3Mn2Se2 [36]. For this compound, one may expect that spin-splitting ...

    work page

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    + 4SJ1 + 2SK +B, gk = 2SJ′ 2 cos(2kya) + 2SJ2 cos(2kxa) (25b) − 2S(J2 +J′

  2. [8]

    + 4SJ1 + 2SK−B, r1,k = 2SJ1[cos(kxa−kya) + cos(kxa +kya)], (25c) r2,k = 2SD[cos(kxa−kya)− cos(kxa +kya)]. (25d) A. Magnon bands and Berry curvature The excitation energies are found as outlined in Eqs. (11) and (12). We define the sum of excitation energies ω = (E+ +E−)/2 and ...

  3. [9]

    + 4K] [cos(2kxa)− cos(2kya)] − (J2 +J′

  4. [10]

    (27) This quantity is shown in Fig

    [cos(4kxa)− cos(4kya)]}. (27) This quantity is shown in Fig. 4 along high-symmetry directions in the first magnetic Brillouin zone. It is seen that F± xy(k) is even under k→−k and odd under a 90◦ rotation in momentum space. Therefore, the momentum space integral over the first...

  5. [11]

    These can be understood from the asymptotic expansions of c1 and c2: c1(x) ≈ x≪1 −x ln(x), c 1(x) ≈ x≫1 ln(x), (30a) c2(x) ≈ x≪1 x ln2(x), c 2(x) ≈ x≫1 π2/3− 1/x + 1/2x2

    High and low temperature limit We next analyze the high and low temperature limits of the conductivities. These can be understood from the asymptotic expansions of c1 and c2: c1(x) ≈ x≪1 −x ln(x), c 1(x) ≈ x≫1 ln(x), (30a) c2(x) ≈ x≪1 x ln2(x), c 2(x) ≈ x≫1 π2/3− 1/x + 1/2x2. ...

  6. [12]

    Center of Excellence on Quantum Spintronics

    Zero altermagnetic splitting limit Figure 6 shows that the conductivities vanish together with the strength of the altermagnetic splitting. We now demonstrate this analytically for all temperatures. The difference in excitation energies, denoted by δ in Eq. (26a), is tunably s...

  7. [13]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  8. [14]

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum- dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting mno2: a density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016)

    2016

  9. [15]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  10. [16]

    O. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. Fromage, C. Fields, S. Heywood, R. Cousins, F. Mac- cherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Ki- raly, R. Campion, A. Rushforth, K. Edmonds, S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, and P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of ...

    2024

  11. [18]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal- symmetry-paired spin-valley locking in a layered room- temperatu...

    2024

  12. [19]

    Li and G

    M. Li and G. Chen, Thermal transport for probing quan- tum materials, MRS Bulletin 45, 348–356 (2020)

    2020

  13. [20]

    H. Wang, Z. Zhou, J. Ying, Z. Xiang, R. Wang, A. Wang, Y. Chai, M. He, X. Lu, G. Han, Y. Pan, G. Wang, X. Zhou, and X. Chen, Large magneto-transverse and longitudinal thermoelectric effects in the magnetic weyl semimetal tbptbi, Adv. Mat. 35, 2206941 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Brehm, P

    V. Brehm, P. Sobieszczyk, and A. Qaiumzadeh, Intrinsic spin nernst effect and chiral edge modes in van der waals ferromagnetic insulators: Dzyaloshinskii-moriya versus kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144415 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184406 (2011)

    2011

  16. [23]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    Zarzuela, R

    R. Zarzuela, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, O. Gomonay, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Transport theory and spin- transfer physics in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 064422 (2025)

    2025

  19. [26]

    Weißenhofer and A

    M. Weißenhofer and A. Marmodoro, Atomistic spin dy- namics simulations of magnonic spin seebeck and spin nernst effects in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094427 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    X.-J. Yi, Y. Mao, X. Lu, and Q.-F. Sun, Spin splitting nernst effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035423 (2025)

    2025

  21. [28]

    Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamilto- nian, Phys

    J. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamilto- nian, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 93, 327 (1978)

    1978

  22. [29]

    Tesfaye and A

    I. Tesfaye and A. Eckardt, Quantum geometry of bosonic bogoliubov quasiparticles, arXiv:2406.12981 [cond-mat.quant-gas] (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    Lein and K

    M. Lein and K. Sato, Krein-schr¨ odinger formalism of bosonic bogoliubov–de gennes and certain classical sys- tems and their topological classification, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075414 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    V. P. Flynn, Effective Non-Hermiticity and Topology in Markovian Quadratic Bosonic Dynamics , Ph.D. thesis, Darthmouth College (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    Mackey, N

    D. Mackey, N. Mackey, and F. Tisseur, Structured tools for structured matrices, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 10, 106 (2003)

    2003

  26. [33]

    G. V. J.P. Provost, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  27. [34]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1984, 45 (1984)

    1984

  28. [35]

    M. V. Berry, The quantum phase five years later in Ge- ometric phases in Physics (Edited by A. Shapere and F.Wilczek, World Scientific, 1989)

    1989

  29. [36]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 745 (2022)

    2022

  30. [37]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  31. [38]

    Graf and F

    A. Graf and F. Pi´ echon, Berry curvature and quantum metric in n-band systems: An eigenprojector approach, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085114 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    Shindou, R

    R. Shindou, R. Matsumoto, S. Murakami, and J.-i. Ohe, Topological chiral magnonic edge mode in a magnonic crystal, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174427 (2013)

    2013

  33. [40]

    S. A. Owerre, Topological honeycomb magnon hall effect: A calculation of thermal hall conductivity of magnetic spin excitations, J. Appl. Phys. 120 (2016)

    2016

  34. [41]

    R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1991)

    1991

  35. [42]

    Bures, An extension of kakutani’s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*- algebras, Trans

    D. Bures, An extension of kakutani’s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*- algebras, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135, 199 (1969)

    1969

  36. [43]

    Q.-R. Xu, V. P. Flynn, A. Alase, E. Cobanera, L. Viola, and G. Ortiz, Squaring the fermion: The threefold way and the fate of zero modes, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125127 (2020)

    2020

  37. [44]

    We parameterize the hyperbolic sheet by x = √ 1 +r2, y = r sin(ϕ), z = r cos(ϕ) where r2 = x2 +y2, r≥ 0, ϕ∈ [0, 2π⟩. Then, constructing the deformation retract H(r,ϕ,t ) = q 1 + ((1−t)r)2, (1−t)r sin(ϕ), (1−t)r cos(ϕ) , that continuously shrinks the hyperbolic sheet to a singl...

  38. [46]

    Mæland, B

    K. Mæland, B. Brekke, and A. Sudbø, Many-body effects on superconductivity mediated by double-magnon pro- cesses in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134515 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    C.-C. Wei, X. Li, S. Hatt, X. Huai, J. Liu, B. Singh, K.-M. Kim, R. M. Fernandes, P. Cardon, L. Zhao, T. T. Tran, B. A. Frandsen, K. S. Burch, F. Liu, and H. Ji, la2o3mn2se2: A correlated insulating layered d-wave al- termagnet, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 024402 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Alaei, P

    M. Alaei, P. Sobieszczyk, A. Ptok, N. Rezaei, A. R. Oganov, and A. Qaiumzadeh, Origin of a-type antifer- romagnetism and chiral split magnons in altermagnetic α-mnte, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104416 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Qaiumzadeh, I

    A. Qaiumzadeh, I. A. Ado, R. A. Duine, M. Titov, and A. Brataas, Theory of the interfacial dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in rashba antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 197202 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Kawano and C

    M. Kawano and C. Hotta, Thermal hall effect and topo- logical edge states in a square-lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054422 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  44. [52]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  45. [53]

    Matsumoto, R

    R. Matsumoto, R. Shindou, and S. Murakami, Thermal hall effect of magnons in magnets with dipolar interaction, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054420 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spin nernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217203 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Kondo, Y

    H. Kondo, Y. Akagi, and H. Katsura, Non-hermiticity and topological invariants of magnon bogoliubov–de gennes systems, Prog. Theor. Exp 2020 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    de Oliveira and A

    P. de Oliveira and A. Pires, Magnon hall effect in anti- ferromagnetic lattices, J. Magn. Magn. Mat 583, 171043 (2023). 10

    2023

  49. [57]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Hoyer, R

    R. Hoyer, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K.-H. Ahn, L. ˇSmejkal, and A. Mook, Spontaneous crystal thermal hall effect in insulating altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020412 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.