Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 92 references

In memoriam: aspects of Santosh Kumar's work on exact results in RMT

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review consolidates and vouches for Santosh Kumar's exact results in random matrix theory as a starting point for later work.

desk verdict A careful memorial review with no new results that is genuinely useful as a resource, but has a concrete error in the quantum conductance section that should be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04943 v1 pith:TE7FFG3U submitted 2025-05-08 math-ph math.MP

Peter J. Forrester This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 60B2015B5233C6081Q50
keywords randommatrixtheoryexactresultsquantumentanglementBures-HallensembleMeijerG-functionconductanceJacobiinmemoriam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Santosh Kumar worked on exact random matrix theory results used in quantum entanglement, quantum chaos, and conductance statistics. This review, written after his death, tries to set down the main directions and formulas of his work accurately enough that others can build on them without relocating the original derivations. The value of the paper, if its account is right, is that a scattered collection of exact formulas, such as Bures-Hall entanglement averages, Meijer G-function evaluations with rational multiples of $\pi^2$, and conductance probability densities, is gathered in one place with derivations cited. The review functions as a tribute and a working reference at the same time.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a set of exact analytic tools: the Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures-Hall probability measures on density-matrix eigenvalues, with their Laguerre counterparts linked by inverse Laplace transform; the Meijer G-function and its three-term recurrence (2.3), used to reduce special values to finite sums; biorthogonal and polynomial-ensemble structures, including the derivative principle (3.2) and a pseudo-unitary Harish-Chandra/Itzykson-Zuber integral; and a differential-difference recursion (4.9) for $\beta$-Laguerre integrals that generates exact conductance densities. These tools carry the argument because each section of the review is organized around one of them, and the formulas are presented as their output.

What would settle it

Check a displayed formula against its source: for example, rederive (4.10) for $\beta = 1$, $N = 3$, $\tilde a = 0$ independently; any mismatch of a coefficient or an attribution would undermine the review's claim to be a reliable resource.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the formulas presented are accurate summaries of Kumar's results and that they are correctly attributed to the original publications. Representative items include the conjectured and later proved averages for Bures-Hall entanglement measures, displayed as (1.19); the closed-form evaluation (2.6) of a Meijer G-function that proves a conjectured arithmetic property for the probability that all eigenvalues of a product of two real Gaussian matrices are real; and the exact conductance distributions such as (4.10) and (4.17), produced by recursion schemes for Laguerre and Jacobi $\beta$ ensembles. The review also records structural findings, for instance the cancellation of higher powers of error functions in half-integer Laguerre cases shown in (4.15) and (4.16), that make inverse Laplace transforms feasible. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as claiming that these are the right formulas and the right provenance.

Load-bearing premise

The review's usefulness depends on the formulas it presents being correct as stated and on each one being attributed to the right original paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A reader needing the average von Neumann entropy or purity for the Bures-Hall ensemble can take (1.19) as exact, with the proof cited to [86].
  • The finite-sum evaluation (2.6) turns the numerical conjecture about products of two real Gaussian matrices into an exact statement with a factor of $\pi^2$ and gives an efficient computation scheme.
  • The recursion for $Q_N(s)$, implemented in computer algebra, yields exact conductance probability densities for small $N$ and $\beta = 1, 2, 4$, including half-integer Laguerre exponent cases via (4.15) and (4.16).
  • The systematic derivative-principle and spherical-transform methods make sums and products of Wishart and GUE matrices tractable as polynomial ensembles.
  • Because the article is framed as a resource, later work can use its formulas without rederiving them, provided the cited originals stand.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same inverse-Laplace bridge that converts Laguerre results into fixed-trace Hilbert-Schmidt results is applied to the featured Wishart fidelity formulas (1.26) and (1.27), exact finite-$N$ averages for the strictly trace-normalized ensemble should follow; the paper does not carry out that final step.
  • The cancellation of higher error-function powers seen in (4.15) and (4.16) hints at a general simplification for half-integer Laguerre parameters beyond the low-order cases checked, so testing the recursion for larger odd $N$ would be a natural next check.
  • The arithmetic pattern that a particular Meijer G-function with parameters depending on $j,k$ evaluates to $\pi^2$ times a rational may generalize to products of more than two real Gaussian matrices; the recurrence (2.3) gives a direct way to probe that numerically.
  • The smallest-eigenvalue distribution from section 1.3 connects entanglement statistics to a measure of effective Hilbert-space dimension; one could use it to predict when a random reduced state is nearly pure or nearly maximally mixed in finite systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a memorial review of Santosh Kumar's contributions to exact random matrix theory, written by his long-time collaborator. It surveys four main themes: (i) entanglement statistics for Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures-Hall random density matrices, including mean entropies, fidelities, and smallest-eigenvalue distributions; (ii) exact evaluations of Meijer G-functions in products of real Gaussian or truncated orthogonal random matrices; (iii) biorthogonal and Pfaffian ensembles for sums and products of Wishart and GUE matrices, as well as the Pandey-Mehta crossover ensemble; and (iv) quantum conductance statistics for Jacobi beta ensembles, including recursive computation schemes and matrix differential equations. The stated purpose is not to derive new results but to document Kumar's findings and provide an accurate resource for future work.

Significance. If the summarized results are correct, the review is a useful single entry point to a body of exact-RMT work spread across physics and mathematics journals. It explicitly distinguishes conjectures from later proofs, as in Eq. (1.19), and it candidly lists omitted areas such as telecommunications, supersymmetry methods, and non-Hermitian ensembles. The algorithmic content of Section 4, especially the recurrence-based evaluation of conductance distributions, is a genuine resource, and the paper names the computer-algebra implementations associated with it. The value as a resource, however, depends on careful attribution, on the correctness of the cited unpublished preprints [29,30], and on internal consistency in the physical mapping of the beta parameter.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, below Eq. (4.2)] The sentence assigning beta=2 to broken time-reversal symmetry and then referring to Dyson's circular orthogonal ensemble of symmetric unitary matrices with beta=1 is internally inconsistent and contradicts the classification cited from [17, §2.2.2]. In the standard RMT classification, absence of spinless time-reversal symmetry gives the circular unitary ensemble (CUE, beta=2), while spinless time-reversal symmetry gives the circular orthogonal ensemble (COE, beta=1) of symmetric unitary matrices. Since the conductance formulas in Section 4.2 are explicitly beta-parameterized, a reader following this sentence would select the wrong ensemble for a given physical symmetry class and compute the wrong conductance PDF. This is a concrete defect in the review's stated role as an accurate resource and should be corrected.
  2. [§4.2.3, Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16)] The structural formulas (4.15) and (4.16) are presented as findings obtained from the recursive scheme, but the text attributes them to the arXiv preprint [29] and later to [30], both of which are described in the reference list as preprints. Because the review's purpose is to provide a reliable resource, the manuscript should explicitly state the status of these results (peer-reviewed versus preprint, proved versus conjectural) and mark them accordingly if they are not yet independently verified. The current wording does not alert the reader to the distinction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.3, below Eq. (2.10)] The limit claim 'Taking this limit in (2.7), it was shown in [24] that indeed (2.2) results' cites [24], which is the Forrester-Kieburg paper on the Bures measure and the Cauchy two-matrix model; the cited result appears to belong instead to [22], the Forrester-Ipsen-Kumar paper on products of truncated orthogonal matrices. Please verify and correct this citation.
  2. [Eq. (1.30)] In Eq. (1.30) the summation index and the coefficient name are mismatched: the sum is over j but the coefficient is written d_l, and the factor '(1-ns)' should likely be '(1-Ns)' in view of the Heaviside argument Theta(1-Ns). Please correct these notational errors.
  3. [Eqs. (1.12), (1.14), (4.2), (4.10)] The notation transcribed as '/BD' in these equations is not defined; if it denotes an indicator function, standard notation such as \mathbb{1} or an explicit condition on the integration domain should be used.
  4. [§1.1, Eq. (3.9)] The sentence introducing the subsystem dimensions is garbled ('with {|a_i>}... and taken >=N'); please rewrite it so that the dimensions n,N and the assumption n>=N are stated clearly. Also, Eq. (3.9) contains an unbalanced parenthesis in the Arctan argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: tribute review compiles externally derived results; self-citations document the literature rather than carry the argument.

full rationale

This manuscript is a memorial review, not a derivation paper. Its central claim is that it accurately reports Santosh Kumar's research; that claim is tested against external benchmarks. The conjectural formula (1.19) is explicitly attributed to Sarkar and Kumar [75] and its proof to Wei [86]; (4.10) is checked against Kumar and Pandey [53]; (4.17) is attributed to [53] and explained by the structures (4.15)-(4.16) reported from [29]. None of these steps define a quantity in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The author does cite many works he co-authored (e.g., [26]-[30]), but these citations are descriptive attributions of where results appeared; they do not function as premises that force the review's conclusions. The review contains a separate factual inconsistency in Section 4.1: 'if there is no time reversal symmetry the scattering matrix should belong to Dyson's circular orthogonal ensemble ... with beta = 1' misassigns beta and ensemble (CUE, beta = 2, for broken time reversal; COE, beta = 1, for spinless time reversal); this is a correctness/consistency defect in the resource function of the review, not a circularity. Therefore no circular step is found; the score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper. It introduces no free parameters, no ad hoc assumptions, and no new entities. The main assumptions are the correctness of the prior results and the accuracy of their attribution.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The results in the cited publications, including unpublished preprints [29] and [30], are mathematically correct.
    The review does not re-derive the formulas; it relies on them being correct.
  • domain assumption The attribution of each result to the original source is accurate.
    A review is trustworthy only if references properly identify where each result appeared.
  • standard math Standard random matrix ensembles are defined as in the cited references, e.g., [17].
    Sections 1 through 4 use standard ensembles (GinUE, LUE, Jacobi beta) without repeating their full definitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In memoriam: aspects of Santosh Kumar's work on exact results in RMT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TE7FFG3U

@misc{pith2026250504943,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In memoriam: aspects of Santosh Kumar's work on exact results in RMT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TE7FFG3U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04943}
}
read the original abstract

Santosh Kumar was an active researcher on the topic of exact results in random matrix theory and their various applications, particularly to quantum chaos and information theory. Barely entering his mid-career, he died unexpectedly on the 18th October 2024. The present article gives an account of some of his research directions and findings. As well as serving as a tribute to his work, this is done also for the purpose of providing a resource for those who may continue along related lines in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Forrester and S

    P.J. Forrester and S. Kumar, Computation of marginal eigenvalue distributions in the Lag uerre and Jacobiβ ensembles, arXiv:2402.16069

    arXiv

  2. [30]

    Computing marginal eigenvalue distributions for the Gaussian and Laguerre orthogonal ensembles

    P.J. Forrester, S. Kumar and B.-J. Shen, Computing marginal eigenvalue distributions for the Gaus- sian and Laguerre orthogonal ensembles , arXiv:2411.15635

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [1]

    Adachi, M

    S. Adachi, M. Toda, and H. Kubotani, Asymptotic analysis of singular values of rectangular comp lex matrices in the Laguerre and fixed trace ensembles , J. Phys. A 44 (2011), 292002(8pp)

    2011

  4. [2]

    Akemann, J.R

    G. Akemann, J.R. Ipsen, and M. Kieburg, Products of recta ngular random matrices: Singular values and progressive scattering, Phys. Rev. E 88 (2013), 052118

    2013

  5. [3]

    Aomoto, Jacobi polynomials associated with Selberg’s integral, SIAM J

    K. Aomoto, Jacobi polynomials associated with Selberg’s integral, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 18 (1987), 545–549. 16

    1987

  6. [4]

    Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Phys. Rev. L ett. Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles , 110 (2011), 084101

    2011

  7. [5]

    Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport , Rev

    C.W.J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport , Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 (1997), 731– 808

    1997

  8. [6]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski, Geometry of quantum states: an introduction to quantum entan - glement, 2nd ed., CUP, 2017

    2017

Show all 92 references
  1. [7]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vidmar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states , PRX Quantum 3 (2022), 030201

    2022

  2. [8]

    Borodin, Biorthogonal ensembles

    A. Borodin, Biorthogonal ensembles. Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998), 704–732

    1998

  3. [9]

    Byun and P.J

    S.-S. Byun and P.J. Forrester, Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles , KIAS Springer Series in Mathematics 3, Springer, 2025

    2025

  4. [10]

    Carrillo, S

    D. Carrillo, S. Kumar, G. Fraidenraich, and L. L. Mendes , Bit error probability for MMSE receiver in GFDM systems , IEEE Commun. Lett. 22 (2018), 942–945

    2018

  5. [11]

    Christandl, B

    M. Christandl, B. Doran, S. Kousidis, M. Walter, Eigenvalue distributions of reduced density matri- ces, Commun. Math. Phys. 332 (2014), 1–52

    2014

  6. [12]

    Da Silva, L.P

    S.V.L. Da Silva, L.P. Jimŕnez, F.D.A. García, S. Kumar, Performance Analysis of Equal-Gain Com- bining Receivers Over Composite Multipath/Shadowing Fadin g Channels , IEEE Access 12 (2024), 90726

    2024

  7. [13]

    Davis, On the null distribution of the sum of the roots of a multivariat e beta distribution , Ann

    A.W. Davis, On the null distribution of the sum of the roots of a multivariat e beta distribution , Ann. Math. Statist. 41 (1970), 1557–1562

    1970

  8. [14]

    Edelman, Eigenvalues and condition numbers of random matrices , SIAM J

    A. Edelman, Eigenvalues and condition numbers of random matrices , SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 9 (1988), 543–560

    1988

  9. [15]

    Edelman, The probability that a random real Gaussian matrix has k real eigenvalues, related distributions, and the circular law , J

    A. Edelman, The probability that a random real Gaussian matrix has k real eigenvalues, related distributions, and the circular law , J. Multivariate. Anal. 60 (1997), 203–232

    1997

  10. [16]

    Eltschka and J

    C. Eltschka and J. Siewert, Joint Schmidt-type decomposition for two bipartite pure qua ntum states , Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020), 022302

    2020

  11. [17]

    Forrester, Log-gases and random matrices , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    P.J. Forrester, Log-gases and random matrices , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    2010

  12. [18]

    Forrester, The limiting Kac random polynomial and truncated random ortho gonal matrices , J

    P.J. Forrester, The limiting Kac random polynomial and truncated random ortho gonal matrices , J. Stat. Mech. 12, (2010) P12018

    2010

  13. [19]

    Forrester, Probability of all eigenvalues real for products of standar d Gaussian matrices , J

    P.J. Forrester, Probability of all eigenvalues real for products of standar d Gaussian matrices , J. Phys. A 47 (2014), 065202

    2014

  14. [20]

    Forrester, A review of exact results for fluctuation formulas in random ma trix theory , Probab

    P.J. Forrester, A review of exact results for fluctuation formulas in random ma trix theory , Probab. Surveys 20 (2023), 170–225

    2023

  15. [21]

    Forrester and T.D

    P.J. Forrester and T.D. Hughes, Complex Wishart matrices and conductance in mesoscopic syste ms: exact results , J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994), 6736–6747

    1994

  16. [22]

    Forrester, J.R

    P.J. Forrester, J.R. Ipsen and S. Kumar, How many eigenvalues of a product of truncated orthogonal matrices are real? Exper. Math. 29 (2020), 276–290

    2020

  17. [23]

    Forrester, I.R

    P.J. Forrester, I.R. Ipsen and D.-Z. Liu, Matrix product ensembles of Hermite type and the Hyperbolic Harish-Chandr-Itzykson-Zuber integral, Ann. Henri Poincaré 19 (2018), 1307

    2018

  18. [24]

    Forrester and M

    P.J. Forrester and M. Kieburg, Relating the Bures measure to the Cauchy two-matrix model , Comm. Math. Phys. 342 (2016), 151–187

    2016

  19. [25]

    Forrester and S

    P.J. Forrester and S. Kumar, The probability that all eigenvalues are real for products o f truncated real orthogonal random matrices , J. Theoret. Probab. 31 (2018), 2056–2071. 17

    2018

  20. [26]

    Forrester and S

    P.J. Forrester and S. Kumar, Recursion scheme for the largest β-Wishart-Laguerre eigenvalue and Landauer conductance in quantum transport , J. Phys. A 52 (2019), 42LT02

    2019

  21. [27]

    Forrester and S

    P.J. Forrester and S. Kumar, Differential recurrences for the distribution of the trace of t heβ-Jacobi ensemble, Physica D, 434 (2022), 133220

    2022

  22. [28]

    Forrester and S

    P.J. Forrester and S. Kumar, Computable structural formulas for the distribution of the β-Jacobi edge eigenvalues, Ramanujan J. 61, 87–110 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Forrester and A

    P.J. Forrester and A. Mays, Pfaffian point processes for the Gaussian real generalised ei genvalue problem, Prob. Theory and Rel. Fields 154 (2012), 1–47

    2012

  24. [32]

    Forrester and A

    P.J. Forrester and A. K. Trinh, Finite size corrections at the hard edge for the Laguerre β ensemble, Stud. Appl. Math. 143 (2019), 315–336

    2019

  25. [33]

    Fyodorov, Negative moments of characteristic polynomials of random ma trices: Ingham? Siegel integral as an alternative to Hubbard?Stratonovich transfo rmation, Nucl

    Y.V. Fyodorov, Negative moments of characteristic polynomials of random ma trices: Ingham? Siegel integral as an alternative to Hubbard?Stratonovich transfo rmation, Nucl. Phys. B 621 (2002) 643

    2002

  26. [34]

    Fyodorov and E

    Y.V. Fyodorov and E. Strahov, Characteristic polynomi als of random Hermitian matrices and Duis- termaat?Heckman localisation on non-compact K?ahler mani folds. Nucl. Phys. B 630 (2002) 453

    2002

  27. [35]

    Giraud, Purity distribution for bipartite random pure states , J

    O. Giraud, Purity distribution for bipartite random pure states , J. Phys. A 40 (2007), F1053

    2007

  28. [36]

    Hall, Random quantum correlations and density operator distributi ons, Phys

    M.J.W. Hall, Random quantum correlations and density operator distributi ons, Phys. Lett. A 242 (1998), 123

    1998

  29. [37]

    Khoruzhenko, H.-J

    B.A. Khoruzhenko, H.-J. Sommers, and K. Zyczkowski, Truncations of random orthogonal matrices , Phys. Rev. E 82 (2010), 040106(R) (4pp)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Kieburg, Additive matrix convolutions of Pólya ensembles and polynom ial ensembles, Rand

    M. Kieburg, Additive matrix convolutions of Pólya ensembles and polynom ial ensembles, Rand. Matr. Th. Appl. 9 (2019), 2150002

    2019

  31. [39]

    Kieburg and H

    M. Kieburg and H. Kösters, Exact relation between singular value and eigenvalue stati stics, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications 5 (2016), 1650015

    2016

  32. [40]

    Kieburg and H

    M. Kieburg and H. Kösters, Products of random matrices from polynomial ensembles , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 55 (2019), 98–126

    2019

  33. [41]

    Kieburg, A

    M. Kieburg, A. B. J. Kuijlaars, and D. Stivigny, Singular value statistics of matrix products with truncated unitary matrices. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2016) 3392

    2016

  34. [42]

    Kieburg and J

    M. Kieburg and J. Zhang, Derivative principles for invariant ensembles , Adv. Math. 413 (2023), 108833

    2023

  35. [43]

    Modern Trends in Constructive Function Theory

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars, Transformations of polynomial ensembles. In “ Modern Trends in Constructive Function Theory” Amer. Math. Soc. (2016) 253

    2016

  36. [44]

    Kuijlaars and P

    A.B.J. Kuijlaars and P. Román, Spherical functions approach to sums of random Hermitian matri ces, Int. Math. Res. Not., 2 2019, 1005–1029

    2019

  37. [45]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars, and D. Stivigny, Singular values of products of random matrices and polynomia l ensembles. Random Matrices: Theor. Appl. 3 (2014) 1450011

    2014

  38. [46]

    Kumar, Exact evaluations of some Meijer G-functions and probabili ty of all eigenvalues real for products of two Gaussian matrices , J

    S. Kumar, Exact evaluations of some Meijer G-functions and probabili ty of all eigenvalues real for products of two Gaussian matrices , J. Phys. A, 48 (2015) 445206

    2015

  39. [47]

    Kumar, Random matrix ensembles involving Gaussian Wigner and Wisha rt matrices, and biorthogonal structure, Phys

    S. Kumar, Random matrix ensembles involving Gaussian Wigner and Wisha rt matrices, and biorthogonal structure, Phys. Rev. E 92 (2015), 032903. 18

    2015

  40. [48]

    Kumar, Recursion for the Smallest Eigenvalue Density of beta-Wisha rt-Laguerre Ensemble , J

    S. Kumar, Recursion for the Smallest Eigenvalue Density of beta-Wisha rt-Laguerre Ensemble , J. Stat. Phys. 175, (2019) 126

    2019

  41. [49]

    Kumar, Wishart and random density matrices: Analytical results for t he mean-square Hilbert- Schmidt distance, Phys

    S. Kumar, Wishart and random density matrices: Analytical results for t he mean-square Hilbert- Schmidt distance, Phys. Rev. A 102 (2020), 012405

    2020

  42. [50]

    Kumar, S.S

    S. Kumar, S.S. Charan, Spectral statistics for the difference of two Wishart matrices , J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 53 (2020), 505202

    2020

  43. [51]

    Kumar, A

    S. Kumar, A. Nock, H.-J. Sommers, T. Guhr, B. Dietz, M. Mi ski-Oglu, A. Richter, F. Schäfer, Dis- tribution of scattering matrix elements in quantum chaotic sca ttering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), 030403

    2013

  44. [52]

    Kumar and A

    S. Kumar and A. Pandey Random matrix model for Nakagami-Hoyt fading , IEEE Trans. Inf. Th. 56 (2010), 2360

    2010

  45. [53]

    Kumar and A

    S. Kumar and A. Pandey, Conductance distributions in chaotic mesoscopic cavities , J. Phys. A 43 (2010), 285101

    2010

  46. [54]

    Kumar, B

    S. Kumar, B. Sambasivam, S. Anand, Smallest eigenvalue density for regular or fixed-trace comp lex Wishart-Laguerre ensemble and entanglement in coupled kicke d tops , J. Phys. A 50 (2017), 345201

    2017

  47. [55]

    A. Laha, A. Aggarwal, S. Kumar, Random density matrices: analytical results for mean root fid elity and mean-square Bures distance , Phys. Rev. A 104 (2021), 022438

    2021

  48. [56]

    A. Laha, S. Kumar, Random density matrices: analytical results for mean fidelit y and variance of squared Bures distance , Phys. Rev. E 107 (2023), 034206

    2023

  49. [57]

    Laha and S

    A. Laha and S. Kumar, Random density matrices: Closed form expressions for squared Hilbert- Schmidt distance, Phys. Rev. A 514-515 (2024), 129591

    2024

  50. [58]

    Li and L

    S.-H. Li and L. Wei, Moments of quantum purity and biorthogonal polynomial recurre nce, J. Phys. A 54 (2021), 445204

    2021

  51. [59]

    Lloyd and H

    S. Lloyd and H. Pagels, Complexity as thermodynamic depth , Ann. Phys. 188 (1986),186–213

    1986

  52. [60]

    Lubkin, Entropy of an n-system from its correlation with a k-reservoir, J

    E. Lubkin, Entropy of an n-system from its correlation with a k-reservoir, J. Math. Phys., 19 (1978), 1028

    1978

  53. [61]

    Y. L. Luke, The special functions and their approximations, Vol. I , Academic Press, New York- London, 1969

    1969

  54. [62]

    Mehta, Random matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier, San Diego, 2004

    M.L. Mehta, Random matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier, San Diego, 2004

    2004

  55. [63]

    Mehta and A

    M.L. Mehta and A. Pandey On some Gaussian ensembles of Hermitian Matrices , J. Phys. A 16 (1983), 2655

    1983

  56. [64]

    Mejía, C

    J. Mejía, C. Zapata, A. Botero, The difference between two random mixed quantum states: exac t and asymptotic spectral analysis , J. Phys. A 50 (2017), 025301

    2017

  57. [65]

    Mello and N

    P.A. Mello and N. Kumar N Quantum transport in mesoscopic systems , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004

    2004

  58. [66]

    181 (1988), 290–317

    P.A.Mello, A.Pereyra,and N.Kumar, Macroscopic approach to multichannel disordered conducto rs, Ann.Phys. 181 (1988), 290–317

    1988

  59. [67]

    Nishigaki, Distributions of consecutive level spacings of Gaussian uni tary ensemble and their ratio: ab initio derivation , Prog

    S.M. Nishigaki, Distributions of consecutive level spacings of Gaussian uni tary ensemble and their ratio: ab initio derivation , Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024 081A01

    2024

  60. [68]

    A. Nock, S. Kumar, H.-J. Sommers, T. Guhr, Distributions of off-diagonal scattering matrix ele- ments: exact results , Ann. Phys. 342 (2014), 103

    2014

  61. [69]

    Osipov, H.-J

    V.A. Osipov, H.-J. Sommers, and K. Zyczkowski, Random Bures mixed states and the distribution of their purity , J. Phys. A 43 (2010), 055302

    2010

  62. [70]

    Page, Average entropy of a subsystem , Phys

    D. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), 1291–1294. 19

    1993

  63. [71]

    Pandey and M.L

    A. Pandey and M.L. Mehta, Gaussian ensembles of random Hermitian matrices intermediate between orthogonal and unitary ones , Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983), 449

    1983

  64. [72]

    Puchala, L

    Z. Puchala, L. Pawela, and K. Zyczkowski, Distinguishability of generic quantum states , Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016), 062112

    2016

  65. [73]

    Rao and A

    N.R. Rao and A. Edelman, The polynomial method for random matrices , Found. Comp. Math. 8 (2008), 649–702

    2008

  66. [74]

    Sarkar, A

    A. Sarkar, A. Dheer and S. Kumar, Multifractal dimensions for orthogonal-to-unitary crossov er ensemble, Chaos 34, (2024) 033121

    2024

  67. [75]

    Sarkar and S

    A. Sarkar and S. Kumar, Bures-Hall ensemble: spectral density and average entropi es, J. Phys. A 52 (2019), 295203

    2019

  68. [76]

    Sarkar, M

    A. Sarkar, M. Kothiyal, and S. Kumar, Distribution of the ratio of two consecutive level spacings i n orthogonal to unitary crossover ensembles , Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020), 012216

    2020

  69. [77]

    Sarkar and S

    A. Sarkar and S. Kumar, Generation of Bures-Hall mixed states using coupled kicked tops, Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021), 032423

    2021

  70. [78]

    Sarkar, S

    A. Sarkar, S. Kumar, Entanglement spectrum statistics of a time reversal invariant spin chain system: insights from random matrix theory, Eur. Phys. J. B 96 (2023). 120

    2023

  71. [79]

    Sarkar, S

    A. Sarkar, S. Sen and S. Kumar, Spectral crossovers in non-Hermitian spin chains: comparison with random matrix theory , Phys. Rev. E 108 (2023) 054210

    2023

  72. [80]

    Sen, Average entropy of a quantum subsystem , Phys

    S. Sen, Average entropy of a quantum subsystem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), 1

    1996

  73. [81]

    Sen and S

    S. Sen and S. Kumar, Exact and asymptotic dissipative spectral form factor for el liptic Ginibre unitary ensemble , arXiv:2407.17148

  74. [82]

    S. Sen, H. Shekhar and S. Kumar, Spectral statistics of interpolating random circulant matri x, Phys. Rev. E 111 (2025) 034301

    2025

  75. [83]

    R. K. Singh, Karmeshu, and S. Kumar, A novel approximation for K distribution: Closed-Form BER using DPSK modulation in free-space optical communication , IEEE Photon. J. 9 (2017), 7906817

    2017

  76. [84]

    Sommers and S

    H.-J. Sommers and S. Iida, Eigenvector statistics in the crossover region between Gau ssian orthogonal and unitary ensembles , Phys. Rev. E. 49 (1994), R2513

    1994

  77. [85]

    Sommers and K

    H.-J. Sommers and K. Życzkowski, Statistical properties of random density matrices , J. Phys. A 37 (2004), 8457–8466

    2004

  78. [86]

    Wei, Proof of Sarkar-Kumar’s conjectures on average entanglement e ntropies over the Bures-Hall ensemble, J

    L. Wei, Proof of Sarkar-Kumar’s conjectures on average entanglement e ntropies over the Bures-Hall ensemble, J. Phys. A 53 (2020), 235203

    2020

  79. [87]

    Wei, Exact variance of von Neumann entanglement entropy over the B ures-Hall measure, Phys

    L. Wei, Exact variance of von Neumann entanglement entropy over the B ures-Hall measure, Phys. Rev. E 102 (2020), 062128

    2020

  80. [88]

    Wei and N.S

    L. Wei and N.S. Witte, Quantum interpolating ensemble: bi-orthogonal polynomials and average entropies, Random Matrices: Theory Appl. 12 (2023), 2250055

    2023

  81. [89]

    L. Ye, Y. Huang, J.C. Osborn, L. Wei, Square root statistics of density matrices and their applica tions, Entropy 26 (2024), 68

    2024

  82. [90]

    Zhang, Decompositions, invariances and harmonic analysis in random matrix theory, PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 2021

    J. Zhang, Decompositions, invariances and harmonic analysis in random matrix theory, PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    Zyczkowski and H.-J

    K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, Induced measures in the space of mixed quantum states , J. Phys. A 34 (2001), 7111–7125

    2001

  84. [92]

    Zyczkowski and H.-J

    K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, Bures volume of the set of mixed quantum states , J. Phys. A 36 (2003), 10083–10100. 20

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.