REVIEW 5 cited by
A Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Driven Trusted Multiple Large Language Models Network
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications. However, individual LLMs often produce inconsistent, biased, or hallucinated outputs due to limitations in their training corpora and model architectures. Recently, collaborative frameworks such as the Multi-LLM Network (MultiLLMN) have been introduced, enabling multiple LLMs to interact and jointly respond to user queries. Nevertheless, MultiLLMN architectures raise critical concerns regarding the reliability and security of the generated content, particularly in open environments where malicious or compromised LLMs may be present. Moreover, reliance on centralized coordination undermines system efficiency and introduces single points of failure. In this paper, we propose a novel Trusted MultiLLMN framework, driven by a Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance (WBFT) blockchain consensus mechanism, to ensure the reliability, security, and efficiency of multi-LLM collaboration. In WBFT, voting weights are adaptively assigned to each LLM based on its response quality and trustworthiness, incentivizing reliable behavior, and reducing the impact of malicious nodes. Extensive simulations demonstrate that WBFT significantly improves both consensus security and efficiency compared to classical and modern consensus mechanisms, particularly under wireless network conditions. Furthermore, our evaluations reveal that Trusted MultiLLMN supported by WBFT can deliver higher-quality and more credible responses than both single LLMs and conventional MultiLLMNs, thereby providing a promising path toward building robust, decentralized AI collaboration networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate
Free-MAD picks the winning answer by scoring the full trajectory of agents' answers across debate rounds, beating majority voting with fewer rounds.
-
AI Reasoning for Wireless Communications and Networking: A Survey and Perspectives
A survey that organizes LLM and AI reasoning methods into a taxonomy and maps them onto the physical, link, network, transport, and application layers of wireless networks.
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions
A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.
-
Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Coordination of LLM Agents
A leaderless, Byzantine-robust LLM agent coordination protocol selects answers by geometric-median aggregation of evaluator scores instead of leader-based quorum voting.
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Multiple-Large Language Model (Multi-LLM): Architecture, Trust, and Orchestration
A survey of multi-LLM systems in edge computing, covering architectures, enabling technologies, trust mechanisms, applications, and open datasets for edge general intelligence.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.