Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Characterisation of Markov property on planar maps

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the Markov property together with rerooting invariance forces a planar map law to be a Boltzmann map, with probability proportional to $q^{|F|}$ for internal faces, and extends the same uniqueness to spin-decorated…

desk verdict Serious, mostly sound paper whose abstract overclaims the decorated characterization; the body's theorems are likely correct and deserve refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05447 v2 pith:SUX2UFP7 submitted 2025-05-08 math.PR math-phmath.COmath.MP

Pablo Araya , Luis Fredes , Avelio Sepúlveda This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.COmath.MP MSC 60D0505C8060G40
keywords planarmapsMarkovpropertyBoltzmannpeelingstoppingspin-decoratedmetricBrownianbridges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that on quadrangulations with boundary, the spatial Markov property plus invariance under rerooting is strong enough to force the law to be a Boltzmann map: probability proportional to $q^{|F|}$, the number of internal faces, for a single parameter $0 \le q \le 1/12$. It establishes this for undecorated quadrangulations, for spin-decorated maps such as Ising or Gaussian-free-field decorations on faces, and for decorated metric maps where edges are intervals with random lengths and the decoration runs along them. It also proves a converse: every random submap that induces a Markovian decomposition is a stopping map for some filtration indexed by submaps, and it exhibits a stopping map that no one-face-at-a-time peeling algorithm can produce. The interest is that the Markov property is the main tool for exploring random maps, and the paper shows which laws and which stopping sets are actually compatible with it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gluing relation $q \subset Q$ between a quadrangulation with holes and the full map, which makes the space of maps with holes an index set for filtrations. A random submap $\mathcal{Q}$ is a stopping map when $\{\mathcal{Q} \subset q\}$ is measurable with respect to the $\sigma$-algebra of $q$; the strong Markov property says that conditionally on $\mathcal{Q}$, the fillings of its holes are independent Boltzmann maps. The proof of uniqueness works by comparing a map $q$ with the map $\bar q$ obtained by adding one face at the root, forming the ratio $P(q)/P(\bar q)$; writing that ratio through two different peeling routes shows it is a constant $q$, and then the Markov property upgrades this to $q^{|F(q)|}$. In the metric case the same ratio argument runs through densities with respect to Lebesgue measure, using the identity $\int \hat{P}^{u,z}_{w_1} \hat{P}^{z,v}_{w_2} dz = \hat{P}^{u,v}_{w_1+w_2}$ for non-normalised Brownian bridges, which transfers the Markov property across a cut made mid-edge.

What would settle it

Take any rerooting-invariant family that satisfies the Markov property and compute the ratio $P(q)/P(\bar q)$, where $\bar q$ is $q$ with one extra face glued at the root. The theorem predicts this ratio is a constant $q$ independent of $q$ and of the boundary length; finding any family where the ratio depends on the shape of $q$ disproves the characterization. For the decorated theorem, the paper's own tree-supported example is a clean falsifier of the unqualified statement: a measure supported on trees with arbitrary rerooting-invariant weights satisfies the Markov property vacuously and is not a spin-decorated Boltzmann map.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a uniqueness theorem: if $(P_\ell)_\ell$ is a sequence of laws on quadrangulations with boundary satisfying the Markov property (conditioning on a submap leaves independent Boltzmann-distributed fillings in each hole) and rerooting invariance, then for every map $q$, $P_\ell(q) \propto q^{|F(q)|}$ with $q \le q_c = 1/12$. The same conclusion holds for spin-decorated maps, where the density acquires the Gibbs factor $\exp(-\frac{\beta}{2}\sum_{i\sim j}\|\sigma_i-\sigma_j\|^2)$, and for decorated metric maps, where the density is $q^{|V|} \prod_e e^{-\lambda w_e} \hat{P}^{\sigma_i\sigma_j}_{w_e} dw_e$ with $\hat{P}$ the non-normalised Brownian bridge measure; exploring mid-edge produces the $w_e^{-n/2}$ factor from a Brownian bridge returning to its starting value. The paper further proves that a random submap induces a Markovian decomposition of a Boltzmann map if and only if it is a stopping map for a suitable filtration, and gives an explicit stopping map that cannot be recovered by peeling one face at a time. For decorated maps the theorem assumes at least one internal face has positive probability, without which the characterization can fail on tree-supported measures; the metric version assumes positive edge lengths with high probability and continuity in boundary conditions.

Load-bearing premise

For decorated maps the characterization needs at least one internal face to have positive probability, because if the map is almost surely a tree the decoration is empty and non-Boltzmann rerooting-invariant Markov laws exist; the metric version moreover needs edge lengths positive with high probability and boundary continuity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any rerooting-invariant, Markovian law on quadrangulations with boundary is Boltzmann with a single parameter $q \in [0, 1/12]$; no other parameters survive once the two symmetries are imposed.
  • The strong Markov property is available for every stopping map of a Boltzmann map, so exploration is not restricted to the classic one-face peeling procedure.
  • Conversely, the only random submaps that give a Markovian decomposition are stopping maps, so the two notions are exactly equivalent.
  • There exist stopping maps that no algorithmic one-face peeling can generate, and such maps still yield Markovian decompositions.
  • Boltzmann decorated metric maps are the unique Markov rerooting-invariant laws on metric maps, with an explicit edge-length density containing $e^{-\lambda w}$ times the $w^{-n/2}$ Brownian-bridge return factor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the uniqueness argument only needs two peeling routes and a density ratio, a testable extension is to run the same ratio on maps with several boundary components or on bipartite maps with face weights: the predicted outcome is again a one-parameter Boltzmann law, with an extra weight per boundary component if rerooting is relaxed.
  • The $w^{-n/2}$ factor is the paper's explanation of why small edges are cheap: it is the Brownian bridge density of returning to the starting spin. One can test this directly by simulating a Boltzmann decorated metric map and measuring the empirical edge-length density against $w^{-n/2} e^{-\lambda w}$; deviations would show where the Brownian-bridge model stops being the right decoration.
  • In the degenerate tree-supported case, the Markov property becomes vacuous because there are no interior faces to condition on; this suggests that for decorated models the natural state space should exclude maps with no interior faces if one wants a clean uniqueness theorem.
  • The local-maps-are-stopping-maps direction transfers naturally to continuum random geometries: cutting a Liouville quantum gravity surface by a stopping set should be Markovian exactly for sets that are local in the filtration sense, mirroring the discrete theorem.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unifying framework for the spatial Markov property for quadrangulations with boundary, in three settings: undecorated maps, spin-decorated maps, and metric decorated maps. The main results are (i) a characterization, Theorems 1.2, 3.20, 4.10, and 5.25, of rerooting-invariant Markovian measures as Boltzmann-type measures with weight q^{|F|}, extended to spin decorations and to metric maps with an additional exponential edge weight; (ii) a characterization of random submaps that induce Markovian decompositions as 'stopping maps' for map-indexed filtrations (Theorems 1.3, 3.15, 6.2); and (iii) an example of a stopping map that cannot be obtained by a peeling algorithm (Section 7). The paper is largely self-contained, using map-indexed filtrations, monotone-class arguments, and Brownian-bridge decompositions in the metric setting.

Significance. If the stated characterizations are correct, they provide a clean converse to the well-known Markov property of Boltzmann planar maps: rerooting invariance plus the spatial Markov property forces the law to be Boltzmann, including decorated and metric analogues. The stopping-map framework is a useful contribution because it separates the strong Markov property from the algorithmic peeling procedure, and the metric extension with mid-edge stopping is a natural generalization motivated by the metric graph GFF. The paper also contains explicit, reproducible proof strategies: the ratio argument deriving q, the use of Lemma 2.2 for Brownian-bridge splitting, and the construction of a filtration from a local map in Theorem 6.2. However, the advertised umbrella claim for decorated maps is overbroad as stated, and several load-bearing steps are either explicitly deferred or not fully written, which currently prevents the results from being accepted in their advertised form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 4.10, Remark 4.13] The abstract states a characterization of rerooting-invariant Markovian laws as Boltzmann-type maps without any non-degeneracy hypothesis, but Theorem 4.10 requires both P_{ℓ,b}(Q has at least one face) > 0 and continuity in the boundary condition. Remark 4.13 explicitly concedes that without the non-degeneracy hypothesis the equivalence fails: tree-supported measures satisfy the Markov property and rerooting invariance but need not be Boltzmann-decorated, since trees carry no internal faces on which the spin interaction can act. This is not a cosmetic caveat: the abstract's blanket claim is false as written, and the statement should either include the hypothesis or the degenerate case must be treated separately.
  2. [Theorem 3.20 and proof, §3.3] The 'more precise version' of Theorem 1.2 stated as Theorem 3.20 claims equivalence with condition (1) 'there is a positive q such that P_ℓ is a q-Boltzmann map', while Theorem 1.2 allows 0 ≤ q ≤ q_c. The proof of (3)⇒(2) shows that all trees have equal probability, but the subsequent (2)⇒(1) argument divides by P_ℓ(Q=q) and defines q(ℓ) as a ratio of such probabilities; this is undefined when the measure is supported on trees. The tree-supported case either needs to be included in the statement as the q=0 Boltzmann law, or the theorem must exclude it. As it stands, condition (3) holds for uniform tree-supported measures while condition (1), with positive q, fails, so the equivalence is not correct as stated for the degenerate case.
  3. [Theorem 5.11 and Definition 5.24, §5.2] The metric Markov property is stated using the relation eq ⊂ eQ, but the text explicitly says in §5.2 that {eq ⊂ eQ} has probability zero for Boltzmann metric maps, while {eq ≺ eQ} has positive probability. The proof of Theorem 5.11 indeed conditions on eq ≺ eQ and only at the end writes eq ⊂ eQ, and Definition 5.24 also uses eq ⊂ eQ. Since conditioning on a null event is not well-defined without further specification, the metric Markov property needs to be restated with the active-submap relation ≺, which is the relation that makes the weak Markov property a statement about positive-probability events. This is a load-bearing issue for the metric characterization Theorem 5.25.
  4. [Claim 4.12 and Claim 5.31, §4.3 and §5.5] The base cases of the tree-comparison inductions are not fully proved. In Claim 4.12 the positivity of q4 is established by the sentence 'if q4 is 0 there have to be ...' and the justification is left to the reader; this is exactly the point where the non-degeneracy assumption is needed. In the metric case, Claim 5.31 says that the base case follows by the same argument as in Theorem 4.10 and leaves it to the reader, and the proof of Theorem 5.25 similarly defers the proof that q(ℓ,b) does not depend on ℓ to 'directly mimics the proof of Theorem 4.10'. The introduction states the paper is completely self-contained, but these deferred arguments are load-bearing for the decorated and metric characterizations and should be written out.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2, Definition 3.9 and Remark 3.10] The definition of stopping map includes Q ⊂ Q almost surely; the remark explaining why this is needed in the spatial setting is helpful, but it would be clearer to state explicitly that the index set for filtrations is countable in the discrete case.
  2. [Section 3.3, proof of Theorem 3.20] In the (2)⇒(1) part, the notation q(1) is introduced only at the last line; it would be clearer to define q := q(1) before the final display.
  3. [Section 4.1] The definition of phantom exterior faces says 'the phantom faces F_i(q)' in one sentence, which appears to be a typo for F_e(q).
  4. [Section 5.3, Definition 5.4] The normalization constant W^{ℓ,b}_{λ,q,β} is written with the arguments in different orders in the text and display; please unify the notation for q, λ, and β.
  5. [Section 5.4.1, Theorem 5.11] The proof of Theorem 5.11 is written for one-dimensional decorations, but the theorem statement says R_n in the surrounding discussion; please specify the dimension used in each statement.
  6. [Section 7, Proposition 7.2] The proof of Proposition 7.2 is diagram-based and refers to a case-by-case argument; a fully formalized description of the branching cases would make the counterexample easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the Markov-property characterizations derive the Boltzmann weights from probability-ratio identities, and the one scope caveat (Remark 4.13) is a correctness issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

This pass found no circular step in the paper's derivation chain. The main characterization theorems (3.20, 4.10, 5.25) do not assume the Boltzmann form; they prove it by defining ratios such as q(ℓ,b,q,σ):=p_{ℓ,b}(q,σ)/p_{ℓ,b}(q̄,σ̄) and then showing, through peeling identities and the Markov property, that the ratio is independent of the map, face count, boundary condition, and perimeter, so that the weight q appears as the derived common value. The Markov property is used as the hypothesis about conditional decompositions, not as the conclusion, and no fitted constants are renamed as predictions. The self-references ([ALS20], [AGS25], [Aru15], [SS13]) are motivational or technical background and are not load-bearing; in particular, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the choice of Boltzmann weights. In Theorem 6.2 the filtration is constructed explicitly from the local map and contains the events {Q⊂p}, so the statement that Q is an F-stopping map follows almost directly from the definition of F; however the substantial part, namely that (Q,ϕ) is an F-Boltzmann decorated map, is proved separately through Lemma 6.3 and the weak Markov property inside holes, so the local-map/stopping-map equivalence is not vacuous. The paper itself flags the main caveat in Remark 4.13: without the hypothesis P_{ℓ,b}(Q has at least one face)>0, the implication (3)⇒(2) in Theorem 4.10 fails because tree-supported measures can be Markov and rerooting-invariant without being Boltzmann-decorated. This makes the abstract's unqualified statement an overstatement, but it is a scope/correctness issue, not circularity. The metric analogue similarly states its extra assumptions explicitly. Overall the derivation is self-contained and independent of any fitted prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard probabilistic machinery rather than on new postulates. The only external mathematical input explicitly acknowledged is the finiteness of the Boltzmann normalizing constant W_q for q <= 1/12, cited from the peeling literature. The paper introduces formal definitions, stopping maps and decorated metric maps, that are not empirical entities and carry no independent falsifiable handle. The decorated characterization additionally assumes non-degeneracy P(Q has at least one face) > 0, without which the equivalence fails on tree-supported measures, and the metric characterization assumes continuity in boundary conditions and positivity of edge lengths with high probability. No constants are fitted to data; the Boltzmann weight q and metric rate lambda emerge from the proofs.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Finiteness of Boltzmann normalizing constants: W_q < infinity for q <= 1/12 (cited to [Cur19]).
    Used in Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 3.20 to ensure Boltzmann weights are probability measures and to justify ratios; the paper states this is the only external input.
  • standard math Kallenberg's regular conditional probability theorem (Theorem 8.5 of [Kal01]).
    Invoked as Lemma 2.1 to identify conditional laws as proportional to product densities in the decorated and metric weak Markov property proofs.
  • standard math Brownian bridge Markov decomposition (Lemma 2.2).
    Used to split Brownian bridges at mid-edge points in Theorem 5.11 and Lemma 5.29; proved from the Markov property of Brownian motion in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Non-degeneracy assumption P_{ell,b}(Q has at least one face) > 0 for the decorated characterization.
    Stated in Theorem 4.10; Remark 4.13 explains that without it, tree-supported measures satisfy Markov and rerooting invariance but are not Boltzmann, so the equivalence is false.
  • domain assumption Continuity of P_{ell,b} in the boundary condition b, and in the metric case lim inf P(inf_{e in E} w_e > epsilon) = 1.
    Assumed in Theorems 4.10 and 5.25; used to upgrade almost-everywhere density statements to everywhere continuity of peeling rates and to apply dominated convergence in Lemmas 5.28 to 5.30.
invented entities (2)
  • Stopping maps
    purpose: Random submaps of a Boltzmann map that are measurable with respect to a map-indexed filtration and, when conditioned on, leave independent Boltzmann-distributed holes.
    A formal mathematical definition introduced by the authors to characterize which random submaps induce a Markovian decomposition; no empirical content.
  • Decorated metric planar maps
    purpose: Planar maps with edge lengths w_e and continuous decorations on each edge, equipped with a Boltzmann-type law involving exponentials of edge lengths and Brownian bridge measures.
    A new model introduced to make the Markov property valid for explorations that stop mid-edge; motivated by the metric graph GFF and O(N) spin systems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterisation of Markov property on planar maps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SUX2UFP7

@misc{pith2026250505447,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterisation of Markov property on planar maps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SUX2UFP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05447}
}
abstract

We revisit, in a self contained way, the Markov property on planar maps and decorated planar maps from three perspectives. First, we characterize the laws on these planar maps that satisfy both the Markov property and rerooting invariance, showing that they are Boltzmann-type maps. Second, we provide a comprehensive characterization of random submaps, that we call stopping maps, satisfying the Markov property, demonstrating that they are not restricted to those obtained through a peeling procedure. Third, we introduce decorated metric planar maps in which edges are replaced by copies of random length intervals $[0,w_e]$, and the decorations are given by continuous functions on the edges. We define a probability measure on them that is the analogue of the Boltzmann map and show that it satisfies the Markov property even for sets that halt exploration mid-edge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05447 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A quadrangulation with a boundary (defined by the root edge in black) and holes h1 and h2 (in grey) with special directed edges. This result may appear similar to Theorem 2 of [BL21]. However, in [BL21] the do not work with the Markov property but with what they call weakly Markovian. In our context, this does not correspond to a Markov property and is more closely related to what we denote in Section 3 uniformly di… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An example of a map q obtained from the gluing between q1 and q2, where to the left we see q1 the map with one hole (colored gray and surrounded by purple) and q2x the map in blue. The transformation identifies (glues) e1 the marked edge of q1 and er the root edge of q2 in blue and all the edges following the sense of them in the hole of q1 and the edges of the external face of q2. The previous order relation allows… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. At the top left, the map q and immediately to its right the map with holes obtained after some peeling iterations. We colored white the discovered map by the peelings so far and here the boundary of the grey regions represents the active boundary. At the bottom left the result of a peeling iteration type 1 (Type 1) on q from ei when peeling the red edge er. And to its right the result of a peeling iteration type 2 (… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: At the root edge we glue a new face and we declare the new external edge as the new root edge, with the right orientation in order to keep the external zone as the new external face. With this procedure q satisfies that |F(q)| = |F(q)| + 1 and |∂q| = |∂q|. To prove the…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: We describe the set of phantom faces. We put dotted edges to express that these are not actual edges of the map and we named them fk where k denotes the index in {0, 1, 2, . . . , 2ℓ − 1} according to the identification. Consider a pair (q, σ), where the first coordina…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Count the number of edges from the tip of the root edge in the sense of the root edge and localise e, this is ℓ1. If ℓ1 is odd : then ℓ2 is odd, then we follow the transformation on the top. If ℓ1 is even :, then ℓ2 is even and we do as the transformation at the bottom…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In red (resp. blue) the identifications made for the 4 half edges forming t1 (resp. t2). Now, we need to define t ⊞ i . Let ⊞ be the quadrangulation with holes presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: An example of the transformation, where the gray part is a hole of ⊞ where we glued t1 to obtain t ⊞ 1 . Each face on t ⊞ 1 has a spin associated. Define s the counterclockwise shift s(i) = i + 4 mod 4 and note q4 = q(2, b)q(2, b ◦ s)q(2, b ◦ s 2 )q(2, b ◦ s 3 ), we co…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: We present examples of the maps acting in the computation of r(bs). To the left we present an example of ⊞ glued with q and the associated spin configuration σ ⊞ + σ. To the right the corresponding transformation to σ ⊞s + σ. Notice that σ ⊞ is completely determined by…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An image of the map q and q † . Here q is locally represented in black and q † in dark red. Let us briefly described the peeling exploration from the point of view of the dual maps. In each step, instead of discovering a new face we discover a new vertex together with…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: We present to the left a stage of a peeling ei described in section Section 3, where the white area is the one discovered by the peeling so far, seen from the map q and from the dual map q † , which reads e † i . We present in blue the active edges and with red the du…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Representation of the peeling procedure for the metric map eq, starting from ˜ei , when selecting the edge e; i.e. when L is smaller than the full length of the edge e. Note that the result is a peeling of Type 3. We added a representation of the decoration as an exam…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: We present the dual of a quadrangulation with exterior face of degree 2, whose dual vertex is represented by the blue square. We follow the right process by labelling the vertices that are visited by it in chronological order and we express in red and fuchsia the map …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Possible peeling steps with positive probability where the peeling does not properly discover Q. Vertices are represented by dots with exception of the root which is presented with a blue square. We name the edges available to be peeled and in purple the peeling step …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cutting $\gamma$-Liouville quantum gravity by Schramm-Loewner evolution for $\kappa \not\in \{\gamma^2, 16/\gamma^2\}$

    Morris Ang and Ewain Gwynne. Cutting -Liouville quantum gravity by Schramm-Loewner evolution for \ ^ 2 , 16/ ^2\ . arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11455 , 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Percolation for 2D classical Heisenberg model and exit sets of vector valued GFF

    Juhan Aru, Christophe Garban, and Avelio Sep \'u lveda. Percolation for 2D classical Heisenberg model and exit sets of vector valued GFF . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 406(2):37, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Brownian half-plane excursion and critical liouville quantum gravity

    Juhan Aru, Nina Holden, Ellen Powell, and Xin Sun. Brownian half-plane excursion and critical liouville quantum gravity. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , 107(1):441--509, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    The first passage sets of the 2D Gaussian free field: convergence and isomorphisms

    Juhan Aru, Titus Lupu, and Avelio Sep \'u lveda. The first passage sets of the 2D Gaussian free field: convergence and isomorphisms. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 375(3):1885--1929, 2020

    work page 1929

  5. [5]

    Local convergence of large random triangulations coupled with an ising model

    Marie Albenque, Laurent M \'e nard, and Gilles Schaeffer. Local convergence of large random triangulations coupled with an ising model. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 374(1):175--217, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    The geometry of the Gaussian free field combined with SLE processes and the KPZ relation

    Juhan Aru. The geometry of the Gaussian free field combined with SLE processes and the KPZ relation . PhD thesis, Ecole normale sup \'e rieure de lyon-ENS LYON, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Counting colored planar maps: algebraicity results

    Olivier Bernardi and Mireille Bousquet-M \'e lou. Counting colored planar maps: algebraicity results. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B , 101(5):315--377, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Counting coloured planar maps: differential equations

    Olivier Bernardi and Mireille Bousquet-M \'e lou. Counting coloured planar maps: differential equations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 354:31--84, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Planar maps as labeled mobiles

    J \'e r \'e mie Bouttier, Philippe Di Francesco, and Emmanuel Guitter. Planar maps as labeled mobiles. The electronic journal of combinatorics , 11(1):69, 2004

    2004

  2. [10]

    Convergence of probability measures

    Patrick Billingsley. Convergence of probability measures . John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Local limits of uniform triangulations in high genus

    Thomas Budzinski and Baptiste Louf. Local limits of uniform triangulations in high genus. Inventiones mathematicae , 223:1--47, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Compact Brownian surfaces I : Brownian disks

    J \'e r \'e mie Bettinelli and Gr \'e gory Miermont. Compact Brownian surfaces I : Brownian disks. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 167(3-4):555--614, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Classification of scaling limits of uniform quadrangulations with a boundary

    Erich Baur, Gr \'e gory Miermont, and Gourab Ray. Classification of scaling limits of uniform quadrangulations with a boundary . The Annals of Probability , 47(6):3397 -- 3477, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Self-avoiding walks on the uipq

    Alessandra Caraceni and Nicolas Curien. Self-avoiding walks on the uipq. In Sojourns in Probability Theory and Statistical Physics-III: Interacting Particle Systems and Random Walks, A Festschrift for Charles M. Newman , pages 138--165. Springer, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    The Brownian plane

    Nicolas Curien and Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall. The Brownian plane. Journal of Theoretical Probability , 27(4):1249--1291, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    First-passage percolation and local modifications of distances in random triangulations

    Nicolas Curien and Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall. First-passage percolation and local modifications of distances in random triangulations. 52(3):631--701, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Uniform infinite planar quadrangulations with a boundary

    Nicolas Curien and Grégory Miermont. Uniform infinite planar quadrangulations with a boundary. Random Structures & Algorithms , 47(1):30--58, 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    Critical ising model on random triangulations of the disk: enumeration and local limits

    Linxiao Chen and Joonas Turunen. Critical ising model on random triangulations of the disk: enumeration and local limits. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 374(3):1577--1643, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Peeling random planar maps

    Nicolas Curien. Peeling random planar maps. Saint-Flour lecture notes , 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Liouville quantum gravity on the riemann sphere

    Fran c ois David, Antti Kupiainen, R \'e mi Rhodes, and Vincent Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on the riemann sphere. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 342(3):869--907, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees

    Bertrand Duplantier, Jason Miller, and Scott Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees. 427, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Uniqueness and universality of the Brownian map

    Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall. Uniqueness and universality of the Brownian map . The Annals of Probability , 41(4):2880 -- 2960, 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    Recurrence of planar graph limits

    Ori Gurel-Gurevich and Asaf Nachmias. Recurrence of planar graph limits. Ann. Math. (2) , 177(2):761--781, 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    Conformal bootstrap in Liouville theory

    Colin Guillarmou, Antti Kupiainen, R \'e mi Rhodes, and Vincent Vargas. Conformal bootstrap in Liouville theory . Acta Mathematica , 233(1):33--194, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Spatial markov property in Brownian disks

    Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall and Armand Riera. Spatial markov property in Brownian disks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01138 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Foundations of modern probability, springer

    Olav Kallenberg. Foundations of modern probability, springer. Berlin etc , 2001

    2001

  19. [27]

    Distances on the CLE _4 , critical Liouville quantum gravity and 3/2 -stable maps

    Emmanuel Kammerer. Distances on the CLE _4 , critical Liouville quantum gravity and 3/2 -stable maps . arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08571 , 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Local structure of random quadrangulations

    Maxim Krikun. Local structure of random quadrangulations. arXiv preprint math/0512304 , 2005

    2005 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Integrability of Liouville theory: proof of the DOZZ formula

    Antti Kupiainen, R \'e mi Rhodes, and Vincent Vargas. Integrability of Liouville theory: proof of the DOZZ formula . Annals of Mathematics , 191(1):81--166, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    The topological structure of scaling limits of large planar maps

    Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall. The topological structure of scaling limits of large planar maps. Inventiones mathematicae , 169:621--670, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    Geodesics in large planar maps and in the B rownian map

    Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall. Geodesics in large planar maps and in the B rownian map. Acta Math. , 205(2):287--360, 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    Peeling the Brownian half-plane

    Jean-Fran c ois Le Gall and Armand Riera. Peeling the Brownian half-plane. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18489 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    From loop clusters and random interlacements to the free field

    Titus Lupu. From loop clusters and random interlacements to the free field . The Annals of Probability , 44(3):2117 -- 2146, 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    A note on I sing random currents, I sing- FK , loop-soups and the G aussian free field

    Titus Lupu and Wendelin Werner. A note on I sing random currents, I sing- FK , loop-soups and the G aussian free field. Electron. Commun. Probab. , 21:Paper No. 13, 7, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    The random pseudo-metric on a graph defined via the zero-set of the Gaussian free field on its metric graph

    Titus Lupu and Wendelin Werner. The random pseudo-metric on a graph defined via the zero-set of the Gaussian free field on its metric graph. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 171:775--818, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    The B rownian map is the scaling limit of uniform random plane quadrangulations

    Gr\'egory Miermont. The B rownian map is the scaling limit of uniform random plane quadrangulations. Acta Math. , 210(2):319--401, 2013

    2013

  29. [37]

    Imaginary geometry I: interacting SLEs

    Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry I: interacting SLEs . Probability Theory and Related Fields , 164:553--705, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Zeros of the partition function for generalized ising systems

    Charles M Newman. Zeros of the partition function for generalized ising systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 27(2):143--159, 1974

    1974

  31. [39]

    Backbone exponent for two-dimensional percolation

    Pierre Nolin, Wei Qian, Xin Sun, and Zijie Zhuang. Backbone exponent for two-dimensional percolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05050 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Conjugaison d'arbres et cartes combinatoires al \'e atoires

    Gilles Schaeffer. Conjugaison d'arbres et cartes combinatoires al \'e atoires . PhD thesis, Bordeaux 1, 1998

    1998

  33. [41]

    Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field. Acta Math. , 202(1):21--137, 2009

    2009

  34. [42]

    A contour line of the continuum Gaussian free field

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. A contour line of the continuum Gaussian free field. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 157(1):47--80, 2013

    2013

  35. [43]

    A census of planar maps

    William Thomas Tutte. A census of planar maps. Canadian Journal of Mathematics , 15:249--271, 1963

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.