Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 89 references

From Events to Enhancement: A Survey on Event-Based Imaging Technologies

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Event-based imaging has a single unifying physical model

desk verdict A useful but overclaimed survey of event-based imaging; the physical-model framing doesn't actually drive the taxonomy, but the map is worth having. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05488 v1 pith:XWZO7PS6 submitted 2025-04-30 cs.CV

Yunfan Lu , Xiaogang Xu , Pengteng Li , Yusheng Wang , Yi Cui , Huizai Yao , Hui Xiong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV MSC 68-0268T4568U10
keywords eventcamerasevent-basedimagingplenopticfunctionimageenhancementvideohighdynamicrangelightfieldreconstructionphotometric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey sets out to show that event-based imaging is not a patchwork of separate tricks but a field with a single physical foundation. It builds a model in which light is described by a plenoptic function—the intensity of every ray in a scene—and in which conventional cameras record an integral of that function over time while event cameras record differential changes (threshold crossings of log-intensity). On this basis, every imaging task can be ranked by how much of the plenoptic function it reconstructs, from standard enhancement tasks (events to video, interpolation, deblurring, HDR) to advanced ones (light-field reconstruction, multi-view generation, photometric imaging). A sympathetic reader would care because the model supplies a shared language for comparing methods, exposing which tasks are related, and pointing toward unified multi-task systems as the natural next step.

What carries the argument

The central object is the physical imaging model built on the plenoptic function, defined in one phrase as the intensity of every light ray in a scene. The load-bearing pair of equations is the frame output $I_0 = f_i(\int_{t_0}^{t_0+\Delta t} A(t)\,dt)$ (Eq. 5) and the event output $E(i,j,t_0)$ as the sign of threshold-crossing log-intensity change (Eq. 6). The model does the taxonomic work: it expresses the two sensor modalities as integral and differential views of the same analog signal, which is why hybrid sensors that capture both are treated as the natural hardware, and why each imaging task can be located by which slice of the plenoptic function it recovers.

What would settle it

Measure the full plenoptic function of a controlled scene with an independent instrument, then run a leading event-based video-interpolation method on footage of the same scene. If the interpolated frames contain angular or spectral variation that the standard-video slice of the plenoptic function should not include, or if the method's error does not track the amount of plenoptic information the model says it recovers, the organizing axis fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a physical imaging model organizes the entire event-based imaging literature. In this model, the complete light signal is the plenoptic function $L(x,y,z,\theta,\phi,\lambda,\tau)$—the intensity of every ray at every position, direction, wavelength, and time (Eq. 1). A sensor at the focal plane maps pixels to ray directions, a response function weights wavelengths, and photoelectric conversion introduces Gaussian and Poisson noise, yielding an analog signal $A$ (Eqs. 2–4). Frame cameras output the integral of $A$ over an exposure time (Eq. 5), while event cameras output differential signals: $+1$ or $-1$ when the log-intensity change crosses a threshold (Eq. 6). Because both outputs come from the same analog signal, the survey argues that every enhancement task is a reconstruction of the integral from the differential, and every advanced task is an attempt to recover a higher-dimensional slice of the plenoptic function. The survey maps the field along this axis and draws the conclusion that unified multi-task frameworks are the natural culmination.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every piece of light information a camera could ever want can be written down in one mathematical function (the plenoptic function), and that event cameras are faithfully described as threshold crossings of log-intensity change; if either fails for real scenes or real sensors, the unified taxonomy loses its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Enhancement tasks—events to video, frame interpolation, deblurring, rolling-shutter correction, super-resolution, low-light enhancement, HDR—form one family because they all reconstruct the same integral-from-differential relationship.
  • Advanced tasks—multi-view generation with NeRF and 3D Gaussian splatting, light-field reconstruction, photometric stereo—inherit the video-enhancement techniques because they recover larger slices of the same plenoptic function.
  • Hybrid sensors that output both frames and events are the hardware consequence of the model, since they capture the integral and differential halves of the same analog signal in spatial and temporal alignment.
  • The shared foundation makes unified multi-task frameworks (for example, joint deblurring, interpolation, and rolling-shutter correction) a natural goal rather than an ad hoc combination.
  • The model exposes open research problems as places where the plenoptic-function view has not yet been applied: RAW-domain processing, hybrid sensor/algorithm co-design, multi-camera setups, IMU fusion, and foundation models with events.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An immediate extension would turn the taxonomy into a metric: score any imaging system by how many dimensions of the plenoptic function it recovers (spatial, angular, spectral, temporal). The survey does not propose such a metric, but the model makes it well-defined.
  • The model implies that real sensor deviations from Eq. 6—refractory periods, per-pixel contrast thresholds, readout noise—should translate into measurable errors in task performance. A systematic study linking sensor non-idealities to task accuracy would test whether the shared-foundation claim holds outside ideal simulations.
  • The same integral/differential decomposition might organize other neuromorphic or computational imaging modalities, such as multispectral event sensors, where the taxonomy's three sensor classes (event-only, beam-splitter, hybrid) would have direct analogues.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of event-based imaging technologies. It proposes a physical imaging model based on the plenoptic function L(x,y,z,θ,φ,λ,τ) and sensor equations for frame and event outputs (Eqs. 1–6), then organizes existing methods into two categories: image/video enhancement (Sec. 3) and advanced imaging (Sec. 4), followed by a discussion of challenges and open questions (Sec. 5). The survey covers representative works in event-to-video reconstruction, video frame interpolation, deblurring, rolling shutter correction, video super-resolution, low-light enhancement, HDR imaging, multi-task frameworks, NeRF/3DGS-based multi-view generation, light field reconstruction, and photometric imaging.

Significance. If the organizational claim were fully supported, the survey would provide a useful unifying perspective on a rapidly growing field. The paper has clear strengths: it gives a concise and mostly accurate account of the standard event generation model; it covers a broad range of tasks and recent work; and it identifies concrete open problems such as RAW-domain processing and hybrid sensor co-design. The continuously updated resource link is also a practical benefit. However, the central claim that the taxonomy is derived from the physical model is under-supported, and the survey's completeness is asserted rather than demonstrated. With the taxonomy claim revised or properly substantiated, this could be a valuable resource; in its current form, the contribution is primarily a selective and somewhat imbalanced task map.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (1) and (6); Secs. 3.2 and 4.3] The taxonomy is not derived from the physical model as claimed. In Sec. 3.2, VFI, deblurring, RSC, and VSR all recover the same intensity-valued slice of Eq. (1); they differ only in the assumed input degradation, so the model does not separate these tasks. In Sec. 4.3, photometric stereo outputs surface normals and illumination estimates, which are not a subset of L(x,y,z,θ,φ,λ,τ) as defined, and in free space the (x,y,z) and (θ,φ) arguments are redundant along a ray, making 'richer light information' ill-defined. The authors should either define explicit projection operators from Eq. (1) for each task and show that they form a partial order, or revise the abstract and Sec. 1 to say the model motivates rather than determines the taxonomy.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The paper asserts comprehensiveness ('a comprehensive study', 'over two thousand research papers published annually') without providing a literature-selection methodology, inclusion criteria, or coverage statistics. With roughly seventy references spanning several large subfields, the reader cannot verify the completeness claim, and the open-questions section in Sec. 5 cannot be distinguished from the authors' chosen emphasis. Please add a methodology paragraph covering databases, time window, and filtering criteria, or explicitly reframe the contribution as a selective survey.
  3. [Secs. 3.4 and 5] The discussion of multi-task frameworks and future directions relies heavily on the authors' own papers (e.g., Lu et al. 2023a, 2023b, 2024a, 2024b; Liang et al. 2024) without situating them relative to independent work in the same space. This introduces selection bias into the survey's central recommendation that the field should move toward unified multi-task frameworks. The authors should add a balanced comparison that includes works from other groups and should disclose the relationship of their own papers to the claims being made.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 1] The phrase 'extend extend' in the second paragraph is a duplicated word and should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract contains grammatical issues: 'recently advances' should be 'recent advances', and 'photometric' as a standalone noun should be 'photometric imaging'.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] The sentence 'the latter preserving spatial resolution in dynamic captures. without sacrificing spatial resolution.' contains a duplicated and grammatically incomplete phrase; it should be rewritten.
  4. [References] The entries Lu et al. (2024a) and Lu et al. (2025) appear to cite the same UniINR paper with different years; please verify which entry is correct.
  5. [Sec. 2, Eq. (6)] The threshold convention in Eq. (6) is stated only verbally; please specify whether θth is a positive constant and whether the comparisons use absolute values.
  6. [Sec. 3.2, Rolling Shutter Correction] The claim that evaluation on 'simulated or limited datasets raises concerns' would benefit from at least one concrete example or citation to support the concern.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the physical model is an organizing description, not an input that forces the survey's task taxonomy.

full rationale

This is a survey, not a derivation, and the paper does not fit parameters and then repackage them as predictions. The physical imaging model in Sec. 2 (plenoptic function, frame integral, event threshold equation) is stated as background; the task taxonomy is asserted as a way to organize the literature, not algebraically derived from Eqs. 1, 5, or 6. For example, the statement in Sec. 3.1 that event-to-video methods reconstruct Eq. 5 from Eq. 6 is a description of an inverse problem that the community acknowledges is ill-posed; it is not a result forced by construction. The paper's self-citations (e.g., Lu et al. 2023a, 2023b, 2024a, 2024b, 2025; Liang et al. 2024; Zheng et al. 2023) appear as references to the authors' own published methods, but none is used as the sole justification for the survey's central organizing principle or as a substitute for an external benchmark. The physical model is external standard material (plenoptic function from Chan 2014; event threshold behavior from the event-camera literature), and the taxonomy can be checked against the cited third-party works it surveys. The concern that the taxonomy is not fully determined by the plenoptic-function axis is a precision or completeness critique, not circularity: the paper makes an organizational claim, not a derivation whose conclusion is contained in its premises. Therefore no circular step is identifiable, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no fitted parameters or invented entities; its contribution is a classification scheme, so the ledger contains the physical-model assumptions and the paper's own taxonomy assumption.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The plenoptic function (Eq. 1) completely represents light signals for imaging.
    Sec. 2 uses this completeness to define task richness; the survey assumes any imaging task can be scored by how much of this function it recovers.
  • domain assumption Event cameras can be modeled as threshold-crossing detectors of log-intensity change (Eq. 6).
    Sec. 2 Eq. 6 is a simplified model; real sensors add refractory periods, noise, and bandwidth effects which are only acknowledged later.
  • ad hoc to paper Existing methods can be separated into enhancement vs. advanced imaging based on the richness of reconstructed light information.
    This is the survey's own organizing choice (Sec. 1, Fig. 1), not an established division used by prior taxonomies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Events to Enhancement: A Survey on Event-Based Imaging Technologies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XWZO7PS6

@misc{pith2026250505488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Events to Enhancement: A Survey on Event-Based Imaging Technologies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XWZO7PS6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05488}
}
read the original abstract

Event cameras offering high dynamic range and low latency have emerged as disruptive technologies in imaging. Despite growing research on leveraging these benefits for different imaging tasks, a comprehensive study of recently advances and challenges are still lacking. This limits the broader understanding of how to utilize events in universal imaging applications. In this survey, we first introduce a physical model and the characteristics of different event sensors as the foundation. Following this, we highlight the advancement and interaction of image/video enhancement tasks with events. Additionally, we explore advanced tasks, which capture richer light information with events, \eg~light field estimation, multi-view generation, and photometric. Finally, we discuss new challenges and open questions offering a perspective for this rapidly evolving field. More continuously updated resources are at this link: https://github.com/yunfanLu/Awesome-Event-Imaging

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05488 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A diagram that summarizes this survey. structing light signals of interest, e.g.,color and intensity, that serve as inputs for perception and understanding vision applications. To systemat￾ically and comprehensively study these imaging technologies with events, we first propose a phys￾ical imaging model in Sec. 2, which describes the process of converting light signals into analog and digital signals, forming the fo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of two imaging systems combin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a-d) show the RGB frames and events in real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alpix-eiger product:

    Alpsentek . Alpix-eiger product:. Online: https://alpsentek.com/product, 2024. URL https://alpsentek.com/product. Accessed: 2024-12-19

    2024

  2. [2]

    Simultaneous optical flow and intensity estimation from an event camera

    Patrick Bardow, Andrew J Davison, and Stefan Leutenegger. Simultaneous optical flow and intensity estimation from an event camera. In CVPR, pp.\ 884--892, 2016

    2016

  3. [3]

    Spade-e2vid: Spatially-adaptive denormalization for event-based video reconstruction

    Pablo Rodrigo Gantier Cadena, Yeqiang Qian, Chunxiang Wang, and Ming Yang. Spade-e2vid: Spatially-adaptive denormalization for event-based video reconstruction. IEEE TIP, 30: 0 2488--2500, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Recent event camera innovations: A survey

    Bharatesh Chakravarthi, Aayush Atul Verma, Kostas Daniilidis, Cornelia Fermuller, and Yezhou Yang. Recent event camera innovations: A survey. arXiv:2408.13627, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Plenoptic Function, chapter 8, pp.\ 618--623

    Shing Chow Chan. Plenoptic Function, chapter 8, pp.\ 618--623. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2014. ISBN 978-0-387-31439-6. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6_7. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6_7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6_7 2014

  6. [6]

    LaSe-E2V: Towards Language-guided Semantic-Aware Event-to-Video Reconstruction

    Kanghao Chen, Hangyu Li, JiaZhou Zhou, Zeyu Wang, and Lin Wang. Lase-e2v: Towards language-guided semantic-aware event-to-video reconstruction. arXiv:2407.05547, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Indoor lighting estimation using an event camera

    Zehao Chen, Qian Zheng, Peisong Niu, Huajin Tang, and Gang Pan. Indoor lighting estimation using an event camera. In CVPR, pp.\ 14755--14765, 2021. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01452

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Non-coaxial event-guided motion deblurring with spatial alignment

    Hoonhee Cho, Yuhwan Jeong, Taewoo Kim, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Non-coaxial event-guided motion deblurring with spatial alignment. In ICCV, pp.\ 12492--12503, 2023

    2023

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Color event enhanced single-exposure hdr imaging

    Mengyao Cui, Zhigang Wang, Dong Wang, Bin Zhao, and Xuelong Li. Color event enhanced single-exposure hdr imaging. In AAAI, volume 38, pp.\ 1399--1407, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Image reconstruction from neuromorphic event cameras using laplacian-prediction and poisson integration with spiking and artificial neural networks

    Hadar Cohen Duwek, Albert Shalumov, and Elishai Ezra Tsur. Image reconstruction from neuromorphic event cameras using laplacian-prediction and poisson integration with spiking and artificial neural networks. In CVPR, pp.\ 1333--1341, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Evshutter: Transforming events for unconstrained rolling shutter correction

    Julius Erbach, Stepan Tulyakov, Patricia Vitoria, Alfredo Bochicchio, and Yuanyou Li. Evshutter: Transforming events for unconstrained rolling shutter correction. In CVPR, pp.\ 13904--13913, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Hypere2vid: Improving event-based video reconstruction via hypernetworks

    Burak Ercan, Onur Eker, Canberk Saglam, Aykut Erdem, and Erkut Erdem. Hypere2vid: Improving event-based video reconstruction via hypernetworks. IEEE TIP, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Thomas Finateu, Atsumi Niwa, Daniel Matolin, Koya Tsuchimoto, Andrea Mascheroni, Etienne Reynaud, Pooria Mostafalu, Frederick Brady, Ludovic Chotard, Florian LeGoff, et al. 5.10 a 1280 720 back-illuminated stacked temporal contrast event-based vision sensor with 4.86 m pixels,...

    2020

  6. [14]

    u ck, Garrick Orchard, Chiara Bartolozzi, Brian Taba, Andrea Censi, Stefan Leutenegger, Andrew J Davison, J \

    Guillermo Gallego, Tobi Delbr \"u ck, Garrick Orchard, Chiara Bartolozzi, Brian Taba, Andrea Censi, Stefan Leutenegger, Andrew J Davison, J \"o rg Conradt, Kostas Daniilidis, et al. Event-based vision: A survey. IEEE-TPAMI, 44 0 (1): 0 154--180, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Low-latency automotive vision with event cameras

    Daniel Gehrig and Davide Scaramuzza. Low-latency automotive vision with event cameras. Nature, 629 0 (8014): 0 1034--1040, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Event-based stereo depth estimation: A survey

    Suman Ghosh and Guillermo Gallego. Event-based stereo depth estimation: A survey. arXiv:2409.17680, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Eventlfm: event camera integrated fourier light field microscopy for ultrafast 3d imaging

    Ruipeng Guo, Qianwan Yang, Andrew S Chang, Guorong Hu, Joseph Greene, Christopher V Gabel, Sixian You, and Lei Tian. Eventlfm: event camera integrated fourier light field microscopy for ultrafast 3d imaging. Light: Science & Applications, 13 0 (1): 0 144, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Time-efficient light-field acquisition using coded aperture and events

    Shuji Habuchi, Keita Takahashi, Chihiro Tsutake, Toshiaki Fujii, and Hajime Nagahara. Time-efficient light-field acquisition using coded aperture and events. In CVPR, pp.\ 24923--24933, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Hybrid high dynamic range imaging fusing neuromorphic and conventional images

    Jin Han, Yixin Yang, Peiqi Duan, Chu Zhou, Lei Ma, Chao Xu, Tiejun Huang, Imari Sato, and Boxin Shi. Hybrid high dynamic range imaging fusing neuromorphic and conventional images. IEEE TPAMI, 45 0 (7): 0 8553--8565, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Timereplayer: Unlocking the potential of event cameras for video interpolation

    Weihua He, Kaichao You, Zhendong Qiao, Xu Jia, Ziyang Zhang, Wenhui Wang, Huchuan Lu, Yaoyuan Wang, and Jianxing Liao. Timereplayer: Unlocking the potential of event cameras for video interpolation. In CVPR, pp.\ 17804--17813, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Event camera based eye motion analysis: A survey

    Khadija Iddrisu, Waseem Shariff, Peter Corcoran, Noel O’Connor, Joe Lemley, and Suzanne Little. Event camera based eye motion analysis: A survey. IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Event-based low-illumination image enhancement

    Yu Jiang, Yuehang Wang, Siqi Li, Yongji Zhang, Minghao Zhao, and Yue Gao. Event-based low-illumination image enhancement. IEEE TMM, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Turning frequency to resolution: Video super-resolution via event cameras

    Yongcheng Jing, Yiding Yang, Xinchao Wang, Mingli Song, and Dacheng Tao. Turning frequency to resolution: Video super-resolution via event cameras. In CVPR, pp.\ 7772--7781, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Video super-resolution via event-driven temporal alignment

    Dachun Kai, Yueyi Zhang, and Xiaoyan Sun. Video super-resolution via event-driven temporal alignment. In ICIP, pp.\ 2950--2954. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Evtexture: Event-driven texture enhancement for video super-resolution

    Dachun Kai, Jiayao Lu, Yueyi Zhang, and Xiaoyan Sun. Evtexture: Event-driven texture enhancement for video super-resolution. ICML, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Event-guided deblurring of unknown exposure time videos

    Taewoo Kim, Jeongmin Lee, Lin Wang, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Event-guided deblurring of unknown exposure time videos. In ECCV, pp.\ 519--538. Springer, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Event-based video frame interpolation with cross-modal asymmetric bidirectional motion fields

    Taewoo Kim, Yujeong Chae, Hyun-Kurl Jang, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Event-based video frame interpolation with cross-modal asymmetric bidirectional motion fields. In CVPR, pp.\ 18032--18042, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Frequency-aware event-based video deblurring for real-world motion blur

    Taewoo Kim, Hoonhee Cho, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Frequency-aware event-based video deblurring for real-world motion blur. In CVPR, pp.\ 24966--24976, 2024 a

    2024

  21. [29]

    Towards real-world event-guided low-light video enhancement and deblurring

    Taewoo Kim, Jaeseok Jeong, Hoonhee Cho, Yuhwan Jeong, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Towards real-world event-guided low-light video enhancement and deblurring. In ECCV, pp.\ 433--451. Springer, 2024 b

    2024

  22. [30]

    E-nerf: Neural radiance fields from a moving event camera

    Simon Klenk, Lukas Koestler, Davide Scaramuzza, and Daniel Cremers. E-nerf: Neural radiance fields from a moving event camera. IEEE RAL, 8 0 (3): 0 1587--1594, 2023. doi:10.1109/LRA.2023.3240646

    2023

  23. [31]

    1.22 m 35.6 mpixel rgb hybrid event-based vision sensor with 4.88 m-pitch event pixels and up to 10k event frame rate by adaptive control on event sparsity

    Kazutoshi Kodama, Yusuke Sato, Yuhi Yorikado, Raphael Berner, Kyoji Mizoguchi, Takahiro Miyazaki, Masahiro Tsukamoto, Yoshihisa Matoba, Hirotaka Shinozaki, Atsumi Niwa, et al. 1.22 m 35.6 mpixel rgb hybrid event-based vision sensor with 4.88 m-pitch event pixels and up to 10k ...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Towards robust event-guided low-light image enhancement: A large-scale real-world event-image dataset and novel approach

    Guoqiang Liang, Kanghao Chen, Hangyu Li, Yunfan Lu, and Lin Wang. Towards robust event-guided low-light image enhancement: A large-scale real-world event-image dataset and novel approach. In CVPR, pp.\ 23--33, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Coherent event guided low-light video enhancement

    Jinxiu Liang, Yixin Yang, Boyu Li, Peiqi Duan, Yong Xu, and Boxin Shi. Coherent event guided low-light video enhancement. In ICCV, pp.\ 10615--10625, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Ef-3dgs: Event-aided free-trajectory 3d gaussian splatting

    Bohao Liao, Wei Zhai, Zengyu Wan, Tianzhu Zhang, Yang Cao, and Zheng-Jun Zha. Ef-3dgs: Event-aided free-trajectory 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv:2410.15392, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Event-guided frame interpolation and dynamic range expansion of single rolling shutter image

    Guixu Lin, Jin Han, Mingdeng Cao, Zhihang Zhong, and Yinqiang Zheng. Event-guided frame interpolation and dynamic range expansion of single rolling shutter image. In ACM MM, pp.\ 3078--3088, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Robust e-nerf: Nerf from sparse & noisy events under non-uniform motion

    Weng Fei Low and Gim Hee Lee. Robust e-nerf: Nerf from sparse & noisy events under non-uniform motion. In ICCV, pp.\ 18335--18346, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Deblur e-nerf: Nerf from motion-blurred events under high-speed or low-light conditions

    Weng Fei Low and Gim Hee Lee. Deblur e-nerf: Nerf from motion-blurred events under high-speed or low-light conditions. In ECCV, pp.\ 192--209. Springer, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Self-supervised learning of event-guided video frame interpolation for rolling shutter frames

    Yunfan Lu, Guoqiang Liang, and Lin Wang. Self-supervised learning of event-guided video frame interpolation for rolling shutter frames. arXiv:2306.15507, 2023 a

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Learning spatial-temporal implicit neural representations for event-guided video super-resolution

    Yunfan Lu, Zipeng Wang, Minjie Liu, Hongjian Wang, and Lin Wang. Learning spatial-temporal implicit neural representations for event-guided video super-resolution. In CVPR, pp.\ 1557--1567, 2023 b

    2023

  32. [40]

    Uniinr: Event-guided unified rolling shutter correction, deblurring, and interpolation

    Yunfan Lu, Guoqiang Liang, Yusheng Wang, Lin Wang, and Hui Xiong. Uniinr: Event-guided unified rolling shutter correction, deblurring, and interpolation. In ECCV, pp.\ 1--20. Springer, 2024 a

    2024

  33. [41]

    Hr-inr: Continuous space-time video super-resolution via event camera

    Yunfan Lu, Zipeng Wang, Yusheng Wang, and Hui Xiong. Hr-inr: Continuous space-time video super-resolution via event camera. arXiv:2405.13389, 2024 b

    2024

  34. [42]

    Uniinr: Event-guided unified rolling shutter correction, deblurring, and interpolation

    Yunfan Lu, Guoqiang Liang, Yusheng Wang, Lin Wang, and Hui Xiong. Uniinr: Event-guided unified rolling shutter correction, deblurring, and interpolation. In ECCV, pp.\ 1--20. Springer, 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    Color4e: Event demosaicing for full-color event guided image deblurring

    Yi Ma, Peiqi Duan, Yuchen Hong, Chu Zhou, Yu Zhang, Jimmy Ren, and Boxin Shi. Color4e: Event demosaicing for full-color event guided image deblurring. In ACM MM, pp.\ 661--670, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Timelens-xl: Real-time event-based video frame interpolation with large motion

    Yongrui Ma, Shi Guo, Yutian Chen, Tianfan Xue, and Jinwei Gu. Timelens-xl: Real-time event-based video frame interpolation with large motion. In ECCV, pp.\ 178--194. Springer, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Besplat--gaussian splatting from a single blurry image and event stream

    Gopi Raju Matta, Reddypalli Trisha, and Kaushik Mitra. Besplat--gaussian splatting from a single blurry image and event stream. arXiv:2412.19370, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Multi-bracket high dynamic range imaging with event cameras

    Nico Messikommer, Stamatios Georgoulis, Daniel Gehrig, Stepan Tulyakov, Julius Erbach, Alfredo Bochicchio, Yuanyou Li, and Davide Scaramuzza. Multi-bracket high dynamic range imaging with event cameras. In CVPR, pp.\ 547--557, 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Bringing a blurry frame alive at high frame-rate with an event camera

    Liyuan Pan, Cedric Scheerlinck, Xin Yu, Richard Hartley, Miaomiao Liu, and Yuchao Dai. Bringing a blurry frame alive at high frame-rate with an event camera. In CVPR, pp.\ 6820--6829, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Back to event basics: Self-supervised learning of image reconstruction for event cameras via photometric constancy

    Federico Paredes-Vall \'e s and Guido CHE De Croon. Back to event basics: Self-supervised learning of image reconstruction for event cameras via photometric constancy. In CVPR, pp.\ 3446--3455, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    E3nerf: Efficient event-enhanced neural radiance fields from blurry images

    Yunshan Qi, Jia Li, Yifan Zhao, Yu Zhang, and Lin Zhu. E3nerf: Efficient event-enhanced neural radiance fields from blurry images. arXiv:2408.01840, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Event fields: Capturing light fields at high speed, resolution, and dynamic range

    Ziyuan Qu, Zihao Zou, Vivek Boominathan, Praneeth Chakravarthula, and Adithya Pediredla. Event fields: Capturing light fields at high speed, resolution, and dynamic range. arXiv:2412.06191, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    High speed and high dynamic range video with an event camera

    Henri Rebecq, Ren \'e Ranftl, Vladlen Koltun, and Davide Scaramuzza. High speed and high dynamic range video with an event camera. IEEE TPAMI, 43 0 (6): 0 1964--1980, 2019

    1964

  44. [52]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj \"o rn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, pp.\ 10684--10695, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Eventnerf: Neural radiance fields from a single colour event camera

    Viktor Rudnev, Mohamed Elgharib, Christian Theobalt, and Vladislav Golyanik. Eventnerf: Neural radiance fields from a single colour event camera. In CVPR, pp.\ 4992--5002, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Event fusion photometric stereo network

    Wonjeong Ryoo, Giljoo Nam, Jae-Sang Hyun, and Sangpil Kim. Event fusion photometric stereo network. Neural Networks, 167: 0 141–158, October 2023. ISSN 0893-6080. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.08.009. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2023.08.009

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Bringing events into video deblurring with non-consecutively blurry frames

    Wei Shang, Dongwei Ren, Dongqing Zou, Jimmy S Ren, Ping Luo, and Wangmeng Zuo. Bringing events into video deblurring with non-consecutively blurry frames. In ICCV, pp.\ 4531--4540, 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Event cameras in automotive sensing: A review

    Waseem Shariff, Mehdi Sefidgar Dilmaghani, Paul Kielty, Mohamed Moustafa, Joe Lemley, and Peter Corcoran. Event cameras in automotive sensing: A review. IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    E-cir: Event-enhanced continuous intensity recovery

    Chen Song, Qixing Huang, and Chandrajit Bajaj. E-cir: Event-enhanced continuous intensity recovery. In CVPR, pp.\ 7803--7812, 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    A 1280 960 dynamic vision sensor with a 4.95- m pixel pitch and motion artifact minimization

    Yunjae Suh, Seungnam Choi, Masamichi Ito, Jeongseok Kim, Youngho Lee, Jongseok Seo, Heejae Jung, Dong-Hee Yeo, Seol Namgung, Jongwoo Bong, et al. A 1280 960 dynamic vision sensor with a 4.95- m pixel pitch and motion artifact minimization. In IEEE ISCAS, pp.\ 1--5. IEEE, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Event-based fusion for motion deblurring with cross-modal attention

    Lei Sun, Christos Sakaridis, Jingyun Liang, Qi Jiang, Kailun Yang, Peng Sun, Yaozu Ye, Kaiwei Wang, and Luc Van Gool. Event-based fusion for motion deblurring with cross-modal attention. In ECCV, pp.\ 412--428. Springer, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    Event-based frame interpolation with ad-hoc deblurring

    Lei Sun, Christos Sakaridis, Jingyun Liang, Peng Sun, Jiezhang Cao, Kai Zhang, Qi Jiang, Kaiwei Wang, and Luc Van Gool. Event-based frame interpolation with ad-hoc deblurring. In CVPR, pp.\ 18043--18052, 2023

    2023

  53. [61]

    Time lens: Event-based video frame interpolation

    Stepan Tulyakov, Daniel Gehrig, Stamatios Georgoulis, Julius Erbach, Mathias Gehrig, Yuanyou Li, and Davide Scaramuzza. Time lens: Event-based video frame interpolation. In CVPR, pp.\ 16155--16164, 2021

    2021

  54. [62]

    Time lens++: Event-based frame interpolation with parametric non-linear flow and multi-scale fusion

    Stepan Tulyakov, Alfredo Bochicchio, Daniel Gehrig, Stamatios Georgoulis, Yuanyou Li, and Davide Scaramuzza. Time lens++: Event-based frame interpolation with parametric non-linear flow and multi-scale fusion. In CVPR, pp.\ 17755--17764, 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    Evggs: A collaborative learning framework for event-based generalizable gaussian splatting

    Jiaxu Wang, Junhao He, Ziyi Zhang, Mingyuan Sun, Jingkai Sun, and Renjing Xu. Evggs: A collaborative learning framework for event-based generalizable gaussian splatting. arXiv:2405.14959, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Self-supervised scene dynamic recovery from rolling shutter images and events

    Yangguang Wang, Xiang Zhang, Mingyuan Lin, Lei Yu, Boxin Shi, Wen Yang, and Gui-Song Xia. Self-supervised scene dynamic recovery from rolling shutter images and events. arXiv:2304.06930, 2023 a

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Event-based shutter unrolling and motion deblurring in dynamic scenes

    Yangguang Wang, Chenxu Jiang, Xu Jia, Yufei Guo, and Lei Yu. Event-based shutter unrolling and motion deblurring in dynamic scenes. IEEE SPL, 2024 b

    2024

  58. [66]

    Revisit event generation model: Self-supervised learning of event-to-video reconstruction with implicit neural representations

    Zipeng Wang, Yunfan Lu, and Lin Wang. Revisit event generation model: Self-supervised learning of event-to-video reconstruction with implicit neural representations. In ECCV, pp.\ 321--339. Springer, 2025

    2025

  59. [67]

    Event-based continuous color video decompression from single frames

    Ziyun Wang, Friedhelm Hamann, Kenneth Chaney, Wen Jiang, Guillermo Gallego, and Kostas Daniilidis. Event-based continuous color video decompression from single frames. arXiv:2312.00113, 2023 b

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Event-based blurry frame interpolation under blind exposure

    Wenming Weng, Yueyi Zhang, and Zhiwei Xiong. Event-based blurry frame interpolation under blind exposure. In CVPR, pp.\ 1588--1598, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Ev-gs: Event-based gaussian splatting for efficient and accurate radiance field rendering

    Jingqian Wu, Shuo Zhu, Chutian Wang, and Edmund Y Lam. Ev-gs: Event-based gaussian splatting for efficient and accurate radiance field rendering. In MLSP, pp.\ 1--6. IEEE, 2024 a

    2024

  62. [70]

    Sweepevgs: Event-based 3d gaussian splatting for macro and micro radiance field rendering from a single sweep

    Jingqian Wu, Shuo Zhu, Chutian Wang, Boxin Shi, and Edmund Y Lam. Sweepevgs: Event-based 3d gaussian splatting for macro and micro radiance field rendering from a single sweep. arXiv:2412.11579, 2024 b

    2024

  63. [71]

    Mipi 2024 challenge on demosaic for hybridevs camera: Methods and results

    Yaqi Wu, Zhihao Fan, Xiaofeng Chu, Jimmy S Ren, Xiaoming Li, Zongsheng Yue, Chongyi Li, Shangcheng Zhou, Ruicheng Feng, Yuekun Dai, et al. Mipi 2024 challenge on demosaic for hybridevs camera: Methods and results. In CVPR, pp.\ 1136--1143, 2024 c

    2024

  64. [72]

    Event-adapted video super-resolution

    Zeyu Xiao, Dachun Kai, Yueyi Zhang, Zheng-Jun Zha, Xiaoyan Sun, and Zhiwei Xiong. Event-adapted video super-resolution. In ECCV, pp.\ 217--235. Springer, 2025

    2025

  65. [73]

    Event3dgs: Event-based 3d gaussian splatting for high-speed robot egomotion

    Tianyi Xiong, Jiayi Wu, Botao He, Cornelia Fermuller, Yiannis Aloimonos, Heng Huang, and Christopher Metzler. Event3dgs: Event-based 3d gaussian splatting for high-speed robot egomotion. In 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Motion deblurring with real events

    Fang Xu, Lei Yu, Bishan Wang, Wen Yang, Gui-Song Xia, Xu Jia, Zhendong Qiao, and Jianzhuang Liu. Motion deblurring with real events. In ICCV, pp.\ 2583--2592, 2021

    2021

  67. [75]

    Learning event guided high dynamic range video reconstruction

    Yixin Yang, Jin Han, Jinxiu Liang, Imari Sato, and Boxin Shi. Learning event guided high dynamic range video reconstruction. In CVPR, pp.\ 13924--13934, 2023

    2023

  68. [76]

    Latency correction for event-guided deblurring and frame interpolation

    Yixin Yang, Jinxiu Liang, Bohan Yu, Yan Chen, Jimmy S Ren, and Boxin Shi. Latency correction for event-guided deblurring and frame interpolation. In CVPR, pp.\ 24977--24986, 2024 a

    2024

  69. [77]

    A vision chip with complementary pathways for open-world sensing

    Zheyu Yang, Taoyi Wang, Yihan Lin, Yuguo Chen, Hui Zeng, Jing Pei, Jiazheng Wang, Xue Liu, Yichun Zhou, Jianqiang Zhang, et al. A vision chip with complementary pathways for open-world sensing. Nature, 629 0 (8014): 0 1027--1033, 2024 b

    2024

  70. [78]

    Eventps: Real-time photometric stereo using an event camera

    Bohan Yu, Jieji Ren, Jin Han, Feishi Wang, Jinxiu Liang, and Boxin Shi. Eventps: Real-time photometric stereo using an event camera. In CVPR, pp.\ 9602--9611, 2024. doi:10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00917

    2024

  71. [79]

    Eventsplat: 3d gaussian splatting from moving event cameras for real-time rendering

    Toshiya Yura, Ashkan Mirzaei, and Igor Gilitschenski. Eventsplat: 3d gaussian splatting from moving event cameras for real-time rendering. arXiv:2412.07293, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Learning to see in the dark with events

    Song Zhang, Yu Zhang, Zhe Jiang, Dongqing Zou, Jimmy Ren, and Bin Zhou. Learning to see in the dark with events. In ECCV, pp.\ 666--682. Springer, 2020

    2020

  73. [81]

    Unifying motion deblurring and frame interpolation with events

    Xiang Zhang and Lei Yu. Unifying motion deblurring and frame interpolation with events. In CVPR, pp.\ 17765--17774, 2022

    2022

  74. [82]

    Generalizing event-based motion deblurring in real-world scenarios

    Xiang Zhang, Lei Yu, Wen Yang, Jianzhuang Liu, and Gui-Song Xia. Generalizing event-based motion deblurring in real-world scenarios. In ICCV, pp.\ 10734--10744, 2023

    2023

  75. [83]

    Neural image re-exposure

    Xinyu Zhang, Hefei Huang, Xu Jia, Dong Wang, Lihe Zhang, Bolun Zheng, Wei Zhou, and Huchuan Lu. Neural image re-exposure. CVIU, 248: 0 104094, 2024 a

    2024

  76. [84]

    Formulating event-based image reconstruction as a linear inverse problem with deep regularization using optical flow

    Zelin Zhang, Anthony J Yezzi, and Guillermo Gallego. Formulating event-based image reconstruction as a linear inverse problem with deep regularization using optical flow. IEEE TPAMI, 45 0 (7): 0 8372--8389, 2022

    2022

  77. [85]

    From sim-to-real: Toward general event-based low-light frame interpolation with per-scene optimization

    Ziran Zhang, Yongrui Ma, Yueting Chen, Feng Zhang, Jinwei Gu, Tianfan Xue, and Shi Guo. From sim-to-real: Toward general event-based low-light frame interpolation with per-scene optimization. In SIGGRAPH Asia, pp.\ 1--10, 2024 b

    2024

  78. [86]

    Deep learning for event-based vision: A comprehensive survey and benchmarks

    Xu Zheng, Yexin Liu, Yunfan Lu, Tongyan Hua, Tianbo Pan, Weiming Zhang, Dacheng Tao, and Lin Wang. Deep learning for event-based vision: A comprehensive survey and benchmarks. arXiv:2302.08890, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Evunroll: Neuromorphic events based rolling shutter image correction

    Xinyu Zhou, Peiqi Duan, Yi Ma, and Boxin Shi. Evunroll: Neuromorphic events based rolling shutter image correction. In CVPR, pp.\ 17775--17784, 2022

    2022

  80. [88]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  81. [89]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence '...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.