Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 147 references

Neutron scattering studies of complex lattice dynamics in energy materials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phonon anharmonicity, not liquid-like phonons, explains ultra-low thermal conductivity in superionic thermoelectrics, a review of neutron scattering evidence concludes.

desk verdict A useful and largely accurate neutron-scattering review, but the central causal claim about anharmonicity in superionic thermoelectrics is stronger than the presented evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06076 v1 pith:O4PR67DE submitted 2025-05-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qingyong Ren , Jianli Wang , Bing Li , Jie Ma , Xin Tong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 28.20.Cz73.50.Lw66.30.H75.30.Sg
keywords neutronscatteringlatticedynamicsphononanharmonicitythermalconductivitysuperionicthermoelectricmaterialssolid-stateelectrolytesbarocaloricmagnetocaloric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review of neutron scattering work argues that lattice dynamics are the common thread behind the best current energy materials: thermoelectrics, solid electrolytes, barocaloric refrigerants, photovoltaics, and magnetocalorics. Its central scientific claim is that in superionic thermoelectric materials, ultra-low lattice thermal conductivity comes chiefly from giant phonon anharmonic scattering, not from the 'liquid-like phonon' picture in which a mobile sublattice suppresses transverse heat-carrying phonons. Neutron scattering resolves the dispute because it measures phonon energies, linewidths, and ion diffusion directly: transverse acoustic phonons survive the superionic transition, while low-energy optical phonons broaden sharply with temperature in step with the drop in thermal conductivity. The broader thesis is that lattice dynamics never act alone in these materials; they act through anharmonic phonons coupled to sublattices, charge, and spin.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing observable is the phonon linewidth in the dynamic structure factor $S(\mathbf{Q},\omega)$ measured by inelastic and quasielastic neutron scattering. A phonon peak that broadens faster than its energy shift as temperature rises signals overdamping and giant anharmonic scattering; a peak whose width exceeds its center energy means the vibration mode is overdamped and needs no activation energy to move. In the decisive superionic case, the machinery is the temperature series of the low-frequency (2-4 meV) phonon band together with the tracking of the transverse acoustic phonon across the phase transition: the TA phonon survives, and the rapid linewidth growth of the lower band matches the drop in lattice thermal conductivity. Quasielastic broadening and the elastic incoherent structure factor supply the complementary ingredient, distinguishing long-range diffusion from geometrically confined molecular rotation and tying the dynamics of the mobile sublattice to the rigid framework.

What would settle it

A direct test would compare the measured temperature dependence of the 2-4 meV phonon linewidth in Ag8SnSe6 with a model that includes only ionic hopping, static disorder, and thermal expansion and no phonon-phonon anharmonicity; if that model reproduces the observed broadening, the central attribution fails. Conversely, a single-crystal experiment on another superionic thermoelectric showing that the transverse acoustic phonon vanishes at the phase transition while lattice thermal conductivity remains ultra-low would support the competing liquid-like picture the paper rejects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the mechanism behind ultra-low lattice thermal conductivity in superionic thermoelectrics is extreme phonon anharmonic scattering, and the paper closes the book on the competing liquid-like phonon proposal for the case of Ag8SnSe6. Inelastic neutron scattering on single crystals shows the transverse acoustic phonon still exists at and above the superionic phase transition, contradicting the idea that a diffusing sublattice destroys transverse phonons; in powders, the 2-4 meV low-energy optical phonon band broadens rapidly between 8 K and 100 K, and that linewidth growth tracks the measured drop in lattice thermal conductivity between 20 and 50 K. The same anharmonic, coupled picture is then used to interpret five material classes: the overdamped phonons and weakly bonded selenium atoms that mediate ion diffusion in argyrodite solid electrolytes, the rotation-lattice coupling and configurational entropy in the NH4I barocaloric, the low-energy phonon damping that lengthens hot-carrier lifetimes in CsPbBr3, and the valence-electron transfer between sublattices that drives the magnetostructural transition in MnCoGe. The concluding claim is that lattice dynamics in energy conversion and storage materials always operate through anharmonic evolution of phonons in combination with sublattice, charge, and spin degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that giant phonon anharmonic scattering, not liquid-like phonon behavior, causes the ultra-low lattice thermal conductivity of Ag8SnSe6 rests on the assumption that the rapid broadening of the 2-4 meV optical phonon band between 8 K and 100 K is dominated by phonon-phonon anharmonicity and not by ionic diffusion, disorder-induced scattering, or thermal expansion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If anharmonic scattering is the main heat-flow suppressor in superionic thermoelectrics, then the design target shifts from creating liquid-like sublattices to steepening phonon-phonon scattering, for example through shallow energy surfaces and low-frequency optical phonons.
  • The survival of transverse acoustic phonons above the superionic transition in Ag8SnSe6 means the liquid-like phonon picture cannot explain the ultralow lattice thermal conductivity of this compound; the same single-crystal measurement should be extended to other superionics to see whether the conclusion generalizes.
  • In argyrodite solid electrolytes, the weakly bonded selenium atoms that change displacement most during the superionic transition are the right chemical sites for tuning ionic conductivity and stability.
  • In plastic crystals such as NH4I, strengthening or weakening lattice anharmonicity controls the hydrogen-bond coupling between ammonium ions and the iodide framework, and therefore the pressure scale and configurational entropy of the barocaloric effect.
  • In halide perovskites, phonon anharmonicity of the [PbBr6] sublattice governs electron-phonon coupling and hot-carrier lifetime, so phonon engineering is also electronic engineering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linewidth-versus-temperature test used for Ag8SnSe6 could be applied to other superionic thermoelectrics (Cu2Se, AgCrSe2, CuCrSe2) to determine whether anharmonic scattering universally outweighs liquid-like behavior or whether some compounds genuinely lose transverse phonons.
  • If anharmonic phonon scattering is the dominant heat-flow suppressor, then doping or strain strategies that increase phonon-phonon scattering without promoting ion migration could decouple low thermal conductivity from high ionic conductivity, a separation the review does not itself propose.
  • The review's open question about a two-channel thermal transport model suggests a concrete neutron experiment: measuring phonon linewidths and the quasielastic/diffusive channel in the same crystal and temperature range to look for an off-diagonal contribution; this is an extension implied by but not performed in the paper.
  • Machine-learning molecular dynamics already reproduces the sublattice dynamics in the argyrodite example, so it could in principle be used to predict which chemical substitutions steepen the shallow energy landscape, turning the anharmonicity claim into a search rule for new low-conductivity materials.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review paper surveys neutron scattering techniques for studying lattice dynamics in energy materials, covering neutron diffraction, total scattering, quasi-elastic and inelastic neutron scattering, and their principles, spectrometers, and data-analysis methods. It then presents five case studies: superionic thermoelectric Ag8SnSe6, solid electrolyte Ag8SnSe6, plastic-crystal barocaloric NH4I, photovoltaic CsPbBr3, and magnetocaloric MnCoGe. The paper's central scientific message, stated in Sections 3 and 7, is that in superionic thermoelectric materials the suppression of lattice thermal conductivity by giant phonon anharmonic scattering is more important than that by the superionic phase transition or the liquid-like phonon model, and more broadly that lattice dynamics in energy materials always act through anharmonic phonon evolution coupled with sublattice, charge, and spin degrees of freedom.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the review would provide a useful synthesis of neutron-scattering contributions to energy materials research, and it does have several strengths: it accurately reproduces the main claims of the cited primary literature, it clearly explains the operation and capabilities of different neutron spectrometers, it explicitly identifies open problems (e.g., the two-channel thermal transport model, multi-ion concerted diffusion, and the need for polarized inelastic scattering), and it includes a candid discussion of limitations. However, the review's strongest claim about the causal priority of phonon anharmonicity is not adequately supported by the evidence presented, and the heavy reliance on the authors' own measurements for four of the five case studies makes the synthesis more self-referential than independent. These issues are addressable by revising the framing and adding critical discussion of alternative explanations, so major revision is appropriate.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] The central claim that in Ag8SnSe6 'the suppression of lattice thermal conductivity by giant phonon anharmonic scattering is more important than that by superionic phase transition and liquid-like phonon model' is under-supported by the evidence shown in Fig. 7. The survival of TA phonons at 450 K (Fig. 7(a),(b)) rules out only the specific liquid-like mechanism in which TA modes vanish; it does not by itself demonstrate that anharmonic scattering dominates. The rapid broadening of the 2–4 meV optical-phonon band in powder S(Q,E) between 8 K and 100 K (Fig. 7(c)–(f)) is attributed to 'extremely large phonon anharmonic behavior,' but the review does not exclude temperature-dependent disorder on the Ag sublattice, quasi-harmonic thermal-expansion shifts, or powder-average dispersion effects as contributors to the observed broadening. Without a quantitative comparison (e.g., energy- and momentum-resolved linewidth analysis against anharmonic DFT or molecular-dynamics predictions, or single-crystal measurements), the priority statement in Section 7 is not established.
  2. [Section 3] The argument that the linewidth broadening 'is highly consistent with the trend of rapid decrease of lattice thermal conductivity' is correlational. Agreement between a microscopic observable and the macroscopic transport curve cannot assign causal priority to phonon-phonon anharmonicity over other temperature-dependent scattering processes unless those processes are separately quantified. The review should either present such a quantitative decomposition or soften the causal ranking.
  3. [Sections 3–6] Four of the five case studies are drawn from the authors' own publications (Refs. 31, 68, 138, and 139). The review therefore reads largely as a self-referential summary of the authors' results rather than an independent synthesis. This does not invalidate the scientific content, but for a review article the balance should be improved by adding independent corroborating or conflicting works, and by explicitly mentioning the self-citation-heavy basis in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] The phrase 'crystal many alone fail' appears to be a typo for 'crystal structure alone fails'.
  2. [Section 5] The abbreviation 'ESIF' on page 26 should be 'EISF' to match the correct usage elsewhere in the paper; the text also contains '(ompressibility)' which should be 'compressibility'.
  3. [Section 7] The sentence 'one is the ... of random diffusion between different phonon branches' is missing a word; it should likely read 'the emergence/effect of random diffusion'.
  4. [Sections 4 and 6] The same reference [31] is used for both the superionic thermoelectric study and the solid-electrolyte study; the text should distinguish the two datasets more clearly when citing it in different contexts.
  5. [Abstract] The header abstract and the translated abstract in the full text differ in length and wording; they should be harmonized in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review synthesizes published experimental results without reducing predictions to fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This paper is a review of neutron scattering studies of lattice dynamics in energy materials; it does not present a new derivation, fitting procedure, or predictive model. The strongest claim, that giant phonon anharmonic scattering is 'more important' than liquid-like phonon behavior in superionic thermoelectrics, is supported by previously published single-crystal inelastic neutron scattering data on Ag8SnSe6 (survival of TA phonons across the superionic transition) and powder S(Q,E) measurements (rapid temperature broadening of low-energy optical phonons). These are externally falsifiable experimental observations, not quantities defined in terms of the review's conclusion. Although the paper frequently cites work by the same authors (e.g., Ref. [31]), those citations point to concrete measurements and machine-learning molecular dynamics results that stand independently of the present review; they are not invoked as a 'uniqueness theorem' or as an unverified premise that forces the conclusion. The interpretive step from linewidth broadening to anharmonicity is a scientific judgment that could be challenged by competing explanations such as disorder or thermal expansion, but that is a question of evidential support and mechanistic inference, not circularity. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted output to an input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no result is imported solely through a self-citation chain. The review is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on standard neutron scattering formalism (Eqs. 1-4) and on domain-specific interpretations from the primary literature, most notably the attribution of phonon linewidth broadening to anharmonicity in Ag8SnSe6 (Section 3).

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The double differential scattering cross section follows Fermi's golden rule with the dynamical structure factor S(Q, omega) as given in Eqs. (1)-(4).
    Section 2.1 introduces the standard neutron scattering formalism; this is textbook background, not new to the paper.
  • domain assumption Lattice thermal conductivity can be described by the phonon free gas model kappa_lat = (1/3) c v l.
    Section 3 uses this model to frame how phonon lifetime and mean free path control thermal conductivity; it is a standard physical approximation.
  • domain assumption The temperature dependence of phonon linewidth broadening in Ag8SnSe6 is dominated by anharmonic phonon-phonon scattering rather than by ionic diffusion or disorder.
    Section 3, Fig. 7(c)-(f): the rapid broadening of 2-4 meV optical phonons between 8 K and 100 K is attributed to extreme anharmonicity; this interpretive assumption underpins the central review conclusion.
  • domain assumption EISF analysis and QENS can determine the orientational degrees of freedom of [NH4]+ tetrahedra in NH4I.
    Section 5 bases the configurational entropy argument on EISF and symmetry analysis; it relies on the standard interpretation of EISF as a geometric fingerprint.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutron scattering studies of complex lattice dynamics in energy materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4PR67DE

@misc{pith2026250506076,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutron scattering studies of complex lattice dynamics in energy materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4PR67DE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06076}
}
read the original abstract

Lattice dynamics play a crucial role in understanding the physical mechanisms of cutting-edge energy materials. Many excellent energy materials have complex multiple-sublattice structures, with intricate lattice dynamics, and the underlying mechanisms are difficult to understand. Neutron scattering technologies, which are known for their high energy and momentum resolution, are powerful tools for simultaneously characterizing material structure and complex lattice dynamics. In recent years, neutron scattering techniques have made significant contributions to the study of energy materials, shedding light on their physical mechanisms. This review article details several neutron scattering techniques commonly used in energy material research, including neutron diffraction, total neutron scattering, quasi-elastic and inelastic neutron scattering. Then, some important research progress made in the field of energy materials in recent years using neutron scattering as the main characterization method is reviewed, including ultra-low lattice thermal conductivity in superionic thermoelectric materials, ion diffusion mechanism of solid-state electrolytes, plastic-crystalline phase transition and configuration entropy changes in barocaloric materials, lattice anharmonicity and charge transport in photovoltaic materials, and first-order magnetic-structural phase transition in magnetocaloric materials. In these complex energy conversion and storage materials, lattice dynamics do not work independently, and their functioning in macroscopic physical properties is always achieved through correlation or mutual coupling with other degrees of freedom, such as sublattices, charge, spin, etc. Through these typical examples, this review paper can provide a reference for further exploring and understanding the energy materials and lattice dynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Huang K, Han R Q 1988 Solid State Physics (Beijing: Higher Education Press)

    1988

  2. [2]

    Ashcroft N W, Mermin N D 1976 Solid State Physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston)

    1976

  3. [3]

    Leguy A M, Frost J M, McMahon A P, Sakai V G, Kochelmann W, Law C, Li X, Foglia F, Walsh A, O'Regan B C, Nelson J, Cabral J T, Barnes P R 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7124

    2015

  4. [4]

    Wang K, Ren Q Y , Gu Z Q, Duan C M, Wang J Z, Zhu F, Fu Y Y , Hao J P, Zhu J F, He L H, Wang C W, Lu Y Y , Ma J, Ma C 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 4410

    2021

  5. [5]

    Kortshagen Group Thermoelectrics https://kortshagen.umn.edu/research/thermoelectrics

  6. [6]

    Pressure Makes Best Cooling https://j-parc.jp/en/topics/2019/190329.html [2019-3-29]

    2019

  7. [7]

    He J, Tritt T M 2017 Science 357 1369

    2017

  8. [8]

    Ye L X 2007 Semiconductor Physics (Beijing: Higher Education Press)

    2007

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Chen Z W, Zhang X Y , Pei Y Z 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705617

    2018

  2. [10]

    Qiu W, Xi L, Wei P, Ke X, Yang J, Zhang W 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 15031

    2014

  3. [11]

    Fu C G, Wu H J, Liu Y T, He J Q, Zhao X B, Zhu T J 2016 Adv. Sci. 3 1600035

    2016

  4. [12]

    Qian X, Zhou J W, Chen G 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 1188

    2021

  5. [13]

    China Phys

    Wei B, Sun Q Y , Li C, Hong J W 2021 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 117001

    2021

  6. [14]

    Akkerman Q A, Manna L 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 604

    2020

  7. [15]

    Muy S, Bachman J C, Giordano L, Chang H H, Abernathy D L, Bansal D, Delaire O, Hori S, Kanno R, Maglia F, Lupart S, Lamp P, Shao-Horn Y 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 850

    2018

  8. [16]

    Cazorla C 2019 Nature 567 470

    2019

  9. [17]

    Shen J J, Fang T, Fu T Z, Xin J Z, Zhao X B, Zhu T J 2019 J. Inorg. Mater. 34 260

    2019

  10. [18]

    Lin S Q, Li W, Li S S, Zhang X Y , Chen Z W, Xu Y D, Chen Y , Pei Y Z 2017 Joule 1 816

    2017

  11. [19]

    Energy Mater

    Li W, Lin S Q, Weiss M, Chen Z W, Li J, Xu Y D, Zeier W G, Pei Y Z 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1800030

    2018

  12. [20]

    Xia K Y , Hu C L, Fu C G, Zhao X B, Zhu T J 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 140503

    2021

  13. [21]

    Zhu J F, Ren Q Y , Chen C, Wang C, Shu M F, He M, Zhang C P, Le M D, Torri S, Wang C W, Wang J L, Cheng Z X, Li L S, Wang G H, Jiang Y X, Wu M Z, Qu Z, Tong X, Chen Y , Zhang Q, Ma J 2024 Nat. Commun. 15 2618

    2024

  14. [22]

    Li X Y , Liu P F, Zhao E Y , Zhang Z G, Guidi T, Le M D, Avdeev M, Ikeda K, Otomo T, Kofu M, Nakajima K, Chen J, He L H, Ren Y , Wang X L, Wang B T, Ren Z F, Zhao H Z, Wang F W 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 942

    2020

  15. [23]

    Liu H L, Shi X, Xu F F, Zhang L L, Zhang W Q, Chen L D, Li Q, Uher C, Day T, Snyder G J 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 422

    2012

  16. [24]

    Li L, Liu Y , Dai J Y , Hong A J, Zeng M, Yan Z B, Xu J, Zhang D, Shan D, Liu S L, Ren Z F, Liu J M 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 5806

    2016

  17. [25]

    Christensen M, Abrahamsen A B, Christensen N B, Juranyi F, Andersen N H, Lefmann K, Andreasson J, Bahl C R, Iversen B B 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 811

    2008

  18. [26]

    Koza M M, Johnson M R, Viennois R, Mutka H, Girard L, Ravot D 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 805

    2008

  19. [27]

    Lee S, Esfarjani K, Luo T F, Zhou J W, Tian Z T, Chen G 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3525

    2014

  20. [28]

    Delaire O, Ma J, Marty K, May A F, McGuire M A, Du M H, Singh D J, Podlesnyak A, Ehlers G, Lumsden M D, Sales B C 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 614

    2011

  21. [29]

    V oneshen D J, Walker H C, Refson K, Goff J P 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 145901

    2017

  22. [30]

    Li C W, Hong J, May A F, Bansal D, Chi S, Hong T, Ehlers G, Delaire O 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 1063

    2015

  23. [31]

    Ren Q Y , Gupta M K, Jin M, Ding J, Wu J, Chen Z W, Lin S Q, Fabelo O, Rodríguez-Velamazán J A, Kofu M, Nakajima K, Wolf M, Zhu F, Wang J L, Cheng Z, Wang G, Tong X, Pei Y Z, Delaire O, Ma J 2023 Nat. Mater. 22 999

    2023

  24. [32]

    Delaire O, Marty K, Stone M B, Kent P R C, Lucas M S, Abernathy D L, Mandrus D, Sales B C 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 4725

    2011

  25. [33]

    Li C W, Hellman O, Ma J, May A F, Cao H B, Chen X, Christianson A D, Ehlers G, Singh D J, Sales B C, Delaire O 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 175501

    2014

  26. [34]

    Han S, Dai S N, Ma J, Ren Q Y , Hu C L, Gao Z H, Duc Le M, Sheptyakov D, Miao P, Torii S, Kamiyama T, Felser C, Yang J, Fu C G, Zhu T J 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 1649

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bachman J C, Muy S, Grimaud A, Chang H H, Pour N, Lux S F, Paschos O, Maglia F, Lupart S, Lamp P, Giordano L, Shao-Horn Y 2015 Chem. Rev. 116 140

    2015

  28. [36]

    Gao Y R, Nolan A M, Du P, Wu Y F, Yang C, Chen Q L, Mo Y F, Bo S H 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 5954

    2020

  29. [37]

    Famprikis T, Canepa P, Dawson J A, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1278

    2019

  30. [38]

    Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y , Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y , Hama S, Kawamoto K, Mitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682

    2011

  31. [39]

    Energy 1 16030

    Kato Y , Hori S, Saito T, Suzuki K, Hirayama M, Mitsui A, Yonemura M, Iba H, Kanno R 2016 Nat. Energy 1 16030

    2016

  32. [40]

    Lanigan-Atkins T, He X, Krogstad M J, Pajerowski D M, Abernathy D L, Xu G, Xu Z, Chung D Y , Kanatzidis M G, Rosenkranz S, Osborn R, Delaire O 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 977

    2021

  33. [41]

    Li B, Kawakita Y , Liu Y , Wang M, Matsuura M, Shibata K, Ohira-Kawamura S, Yamada T, Lin S Q, Nakajima K, Liu S F 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 16086

    2017

  34. [42]

    Li B, Kawakita Y , Ohira-Kawamura S, Sugahara T, Wang H, Wang J L, Chen Y , Kawaguchi S I, Kawaguchi S, Ohara K, Li K, Yu D, Mole R, Hattori T, Kikuchi T, Yano S I, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Ren W, Lin S Q, Sakata O, Nakajima K, Zhang Z 2019 Nature 567 506

    2019

  35. [43]

    Xie M X, Ren J 2022 Wuli 51 855

    2022

  36. [44]

    Ren Q Y , Chen M N, Geng Y S, Ma J, Tong X 2021 Sci. Sin. : Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 087332

    2021

  37. [45]

    Northwestern Uni

    Ma J, Ren Q Y 2017 J. Northwestern Uni. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 47 783

    2017

  38. [46]

    Squires G L 1978 Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering （Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    1978

  39. [47]

    4) (Singapore: World Scientific)

    Furrer A, Mesot J, Strässle T 2009 Neutron Scattering in Condensed Matter Physics (V ol. 4) (Singapore: World Scientific)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Sears V F 1992 Neutron News 3 26

    1992

  41. [49]

    188 05001

    Berrod Q, Lagrené K, Ollivier J, Zanotti J M 2018 EPJ Web Conf. 188 05001

    2018

  42. [50]

    Wang Y X, Gong W, Su Y H, Li B 2024 Acta Metall. Sin. 60 1001

    2024

  43. [51]

    Delaire O A, Stassis C 2012 Phonon Studies (John Wiley & Sons)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Li B, Wang H, Kawakita Y , Zhang Q, Feygenson M, Yu H L, Wu D, Ohara K, Kikuchi T, Shibata K, Yamada T, Ning X K, Chen Y , He J Q, Vaknin D, Wu R Q, Nakajima K, Kanatzidis M G 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 226

    2018

  45. [53]

    Božin E S, Malliakas C D, Souvatzis P, Proffen T, Spaldin N A, Kanatzidis M G, Billinge S J L 2010 Science 330 1660

    2010

  46. [54]

    Sakata M, Sato M 1990 Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A 46 263

    1990

  47. [55]

    Keen D A, Goodwin A L 2015 Nature 521 303

    2015

  48. [56]

    11) (OUP Oxford)

    Neder R B, Proffen T 2008 Diffuse Scattering and Defect Structure Simulations: A Cook Book Using the Program DISCUS (V ol. 11) (OUP Oxford)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Weber T, Simonov A 2012 Zeitschrift für Kristallographie 227 238

    2012

  50. [58]

    Cai G L, Li Y H, Fu Y , Yang H, Mei L, Nie Z Y , Li T F, Liu H, Ke Y B, Wang X L, Brédas J L, Tang M C, Chen X K, Zhan X W, Lu X H 2024 Nat. Commun. 15 2784

    2024

  51. [59]

    Jeffries C M, Ilavsky J, Martel A, Hinrichs S, Meyer A, Pedersen J S, Sokolova A V , Svergun D I 2021 Nature Reviews Methods Primers 1 70

    2021

  52. [60]

    Skoda M W A 2019 Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 42 41

    2019

  53. [61]

    236 04001

    Combet S, Cousin F, Fadda G, Schirò G 2020 EPJ Web Conf. 236 04001

    2020

  54. [62]

    Aswal D K, Sarkar P S, Kashyap Y S 2022 Neutron Imaging: Basics, Techniques and Applications (Springer)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Strobl M, Manke I, Kardjilov N, Hilger A, Dawson M, Banhart J 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 243001

    2009

  56. [64]

    Today 14 248

    Kardjilov N, Manke I, Hilger A, Strobl M, Banhart J 2011 Mater. Today 14 248

    2011

  57. [65]

    Luo W, Feng Y , Liu X Z, Wang M, Zhu D H, Gao W, Geng Y S, Ren Q Y , Shen J Y , Sun Y , Zhang X Y , Xia Y G, Zuo T S, Zheng Y , Tong X 2023 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1046 167676

    2023

  58. [66]

    Embs J P, Juranyi F, Hempelmann R 2010 Z. Phys. Chem. 224 5

    2010

  59. [67]

    Bee M 1988 Quasielastic Neutron Scattering : Principles and Applications in Solid State Chemistry, Biology, and Materials Science (Bristol, England; Philadelphia: Adam Hilger)

    1988

  60. [68]

    Ren Q Y , Qi J, Yu D H, Zhang Z, Song R Q, Song W L, Yuan B, Wang T H, Ren W J, Zhang Z D, Tong X, Li B 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2293

    2022

  61. [69]

    Jobic H, Theodorou D N 2007 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 102 21

    2007

  62. [70]

    Alloys Compd

    Verdal N, Udovic T J, Rush J J, Skripov A V 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 645 S513

    2015

  63. [71]

    Merklein M, Kabakova I V , Zarifi A, Eggleton B J 2022 Appl. Phys. Rev. 9 041306

    2022

  64. [72]

    Wolff C, Smith M J A, Stiller B, Poulton C G 2021 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38 1243

    2021

  65. [73]

    Baron A Q 2015 arXiv: 1504.01098 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Synchrotron

    Ishikawa D, Ellis D S, Uchiyama H, Baron A Q 2015 J. Synchrotron. Radiat. 22 3

    2015

  67. [75]

    Wu M, Shi R C, Qi R S, Li Y H, Du J L, Gao P 2023 Ultramicroscopy 253 113818

    2023

  68. [76]

    Delaire O, May A F, McGuire M A, Porter W D, Lucas M S, Stone M B, Abernathy D L, Ravi V A, Firdosy S A, Snyder G J 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 184302

    2009

  69. [77]

    Shi X, He J 2021 Science 371 343

    2021

  70. [78]

    Mao J, Chen G, Ren Z F 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 454

    2021

  71. [79]

    Toberer E S, Zevalkink A, Snyder G J 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 15843

    2011

  72. [80]

    Wei P C, Liao C N, Wu H J, Yang D, He J, Biesold-McGee G V , Liang S, Yen W T, Tang X, Yeh J W, Lin Z, He J H 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 e1906457

    2020

  73. [81]

    Hanus R, Agne M T, Rettie A J E, Chen Z W, Tan G, Chung D Y , Kanatzidis M G, Pei Y Z, V oorhees P W, Snyder G J 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1900108

    2019

  74. [82]

    Wu Y X, Chen Z W, Nan P F, Xiong F, Lin S Q, Zhang X Y , Chen Y , Chen L D, Ge B H, Pei Y Z 2019 Joule 3 1276

    2019

  75. [83]

    Jiang B B, Yu Y , Cui J, Liu X X, Xie L, Liao J C, Zhang Q H, Huang Y , Ning S C, Jia B H, Zhu B, Bai S Q, Chen L D, Pennycook S J, He J Q 2021 Science 371 830

    2021

  76. [84]

    Zhang Z X, Zhao K P, Wei T R, Qiu P F, Chen L D, Shi X 2020 Energy Environ. Sci. 13 3307

    2020

  77. [85]

    Zhao K P, Qiu P F, Shi X, Chen L D 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 1903867

    2019

  78. [86]

    Niedziela J L, Bansal D, May A F, Ding J, Lanigan-Atkins T, Ehlers G, Abernathy D L, Said A, Delaire O 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 73

    2019

  79. [87]

    Jiang B B, Qiu P F, Eikeland E, Chen H Y , Song Q F, Ren D D, Zhang T S, Yang J, Iversen B B, Shi X, Chen L D 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 943

    2017

  80. [88]

    Ding J, Niedziela J L, Bansal D, Wang J L, He X, May A F, Ehlers G, Abernathy D L, Said A, Alatas A, Ren Y , Arya G, Delaire O 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 3930

    2020

  81. [89]

    Xie L, Feng J H, Li R, He J Q 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 245901

    2020

  82. [90]

    Trachenko K 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 104201

    2008

  83. [91]

    Xie L, Wu D, Yang H L, Yu Y , Wang Y F, He J Q 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 9263

    2019

  84. [92]

    Li W, Lin S Q, Ge B H, Yang J, Zhang W Q, Pei Y Z 2016 Adv. Sci. 3 1600196

    2016

  85. [93]

    de Boissieu M 2023 Nat. Mater. 22 931

    2023

  86. [94]

    Energy 1 16141

    Janek J, Zeier W G 2016 Nat. Energy 1 16141

    2016

  87. [95]

    Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao C Z, Archer L A 2020 Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 229

    2020

  88. [96]

    He X F, Zhu Y Z, Mo Y F 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15893

    2017

  89. [97]

    Zou Z Y , Li Y J, Lu Z H, Wang D, Cui Y H, Guo B K, Li Y J, Liang X M, Feng J W, Li H, Nan C W, Armand M, Chen L Q, Xu K, Shi S Q 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 4169

    2020

  90. [98]

    Zhu L, Wang Y W, Chen J C, Li W L, Wang T T, Wu J, Han S Y , Xia Y H, Wu Y M, Wu M Q, Wang F W, Zheng Y , Peng L M, Liu J J, Chen L Q, Tang W P 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 eabj7698

    2022

  91. [99]

    Wang Y , Richards W D, Ong S P, Miara L J, Kim J C, Mo Y , Ceder G 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 1026

    2015

  92. [100]

    Kraft M A, Culver S P, Calderon M, Böcher F, Krauskopf T, Senyshyn A, Dietrich C, Zevalkink A, Janek J, Zeier W G 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 10909

    2017

  93. [101]

    Zhang Z, Nazar L F 2022 Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 389

    2022

  94. [102]

    Energy Mater

    Muy S, Schlem R, Shao-Horn Y , Zeier W G 2021 Adv. Energy Mater. 11 2002787

    2021

  95. [103]

    The Royal Society 2021 https://royalsociety.org/topics

    2021

  96. [104]

    United Nations Environmental Programme https://ozone.unep.org/ites/default/files/2019 [2018-5]

    2019

  97. [105]

    https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college

    Peters T 2018 Technical Report. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college

    2018

  98. [106]

    Hou H, Qian S, Takeuchi I 2022 Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 633

    2022

  99. [107]

    Chen Y L, Wang Y , Sun W, Qian S X, Liu J 2022 The Innovation 3 100205

    2022

  100. [108]

    Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A, Masselli C 2019 Climate 7 115

    2019

  101. [109]

    Maier L M, Corhan P, Barcza A, Vieyra H A, V ogel C, Koenig J D, Schäfer-Welsen O, Wöllenstein J, Bartholomé K 2020 Commun. Phys. 3 186

    2020

  102. [110]

    Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A, Masselli C 2020 Energy 190 116404

    2020

  103. [111]

    Lloveras P, Zhang Z, Zeng M, Barrio M, Kawakita Y , Yu D, Lin S Q, Li K, Moya X, Tamarit J L, Li B 2023 Colossal Barocaloric Plastic Crystals （IOP Publishing） p7-1-7-30

    2023

  104. [112]

    Zhang K, Zhang Z, Pan H L, Wang H Y , Zhao X T, Qi J, Zhang Z, Song R Q, Yu C Y , Huang B H, Li X J, Chen H C, Yin W, Tan C L, Hu W J, Wübbenhorst M, Luo J S, Yu D H, Zhang Z D, Li B 2024 The Innovation 5 100577

    2024

  105. [113]

    Li B, Zhang Z D 2021 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 067505

    2021

  106. [114]

    Qian X, Han D, Zheng L, Chen J, Tyagi M, Li Q, Du F, Zheng S, Huang X, Zhang S, Shi J, Huang H, Shi X, Chen J, Qin H, Bernholc J, Chen X, Chen L Q, Hong L, Zhang Q M 2021 Nature 600 664

    2021

  107. [115]

    Sin.: Phys

    Hao J Z, Hu F X, Wei Z B, Shen F R, Zhou H B, Gao Y H, Qiao K M, Liang W H, Zhang C, Wang J, Sun J R, Shen B G 2021 Sci. Sin.: Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 067520

    2021

  108. [116]

    Aznar A, Lloveras P, Barrio M, Negrier P, Planes A, Manosa L, Mathur N D, Moya X, Tamarit J L 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 639

    2020

  109. [117]

    Li J, Dunstan D, Lou X, Planes A, Manosa L, Barrio M, Tamarit J L, Lloveras P 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 20354

    2020

  110. [118]

    Li F B, Li M, Xu X, Yang Z C, Xu H, Jia C K, Li K, He J, Li B, Wang H 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 4190

    2020

  111. [119]

    Lloveras P, Aznar A, Barrio M, Negrier P, Popescu C, Planes A, Manosa L, Stern-Taulats E, Avramenko A, Mathur N D, Moya X, Tamarit J L 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1803

    2019

  112. [120]

    Zhang Z, Li K, Lin S Q, Song R, Yu D, Wang Y , Wang J L, Kawaguchi S, Zhang Z, Yu C, Li X, Chen J, He L, Mole R, Yuan B, Ren Q Y , Qian K, Cai Z, Yu J, Wang M, Zhao C, Tong X, Zhang Z, Li B 2023 Sci. Adv. 9 eadd0374

    2023

  113. [121]

    Staveley L A K 1962 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 13 351

    1962

  114. [122]

    Seo J, Ukani R, Zheng J, Braun J D, Wang S, Chen F E, Kim H K, Zhang S, Thai C, McGillicuddy R D, Yan H, Vlassak J J, Mason J A 2024 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 2736

    2024

  115. [123]

    Yu Z B, Zhou H B, Hu F X, Liu C, Yuan S K, Wang D H, Hao J Z, Gao Y H, Wang Y X, Wang B J, Tian Z Y , Lin Y , Zhang C, Yin Z, Wang J, Chen Y Z, Li Y L, Sun J R, Zhao T Y , Shen B G 2022 NPG Asia Mater. 14 96

    2022

  116. [124]

    Sakata M, Harada J, Cooper M J, Rouse K D 1980 Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A 36 7

    1980

  117. [125]

    Songvilay M, Giles-Donovan N, Bari M, Ye Z G, Minns J L, Green M A, Xu G, Gehring P M, Schmalzl K, Ratcliff W D, Brown C M, Chernyshov D, van Beek W, Cochran S, Stock C 2019 Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 093602

    2019

  118. [126]

    Lee W, Li H, Wong A B, Zhang D, Lai M, Yu Y , Kong Q, Lin E, Urban J J, Grossman J C, Yang P 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114 8693

    2017

  119. [127]

    Li W, Vasenko A S, Tang J, Prezhdo O V 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 6219

    2019

  120. [128]

    Ren Q Y , Fu C G, Qiu Q Y , Dai S N, Liu Z Y , Masuda T, Asai S, Hagihala M, Lee S, Torri S, Kamiyama T, He L H, Tong X, Felser C, Singh D J, Zhu T J, Yang J, Ma J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3142

    2020

  121. [129]

    de Campos A, Rocco D L, Carvalho A M, Caron L, Coelho A A, Gama S, da Silva L M, Gandra F C, dos Santos A O, Cardoso L P, von Ranke P J, de Oliveira N A 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 802

    2006

  122. [130]

    Krenke T, Duman E, Acet M, Wassermann E F, Moya X, Manosa L, Planes A 2005 Nat. Mater. 4 450

    2005

  123. [131]

    Liu J, Gottschall T, Skokov K P, Moore J D, Gutfleisch O 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 620

    2012

  124. [132]

    Choe W, Pecharsky V K, Pecharsky A O, Gschneidner Jr K A, Young Jr V G, Miller G J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4617

    2000

  125. [133]

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W D, Wang J L, Cobas R, Cadogan J M, Campbell S J 2015 Hyperfine Interactions 231 75

    2015

  126. [134]

    Alloys Compd

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W D, Wang J L, Studer A J, Campbell S J 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 693 32

    2017

  127. [135]

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W D, Wang J L, Studer A J, Din M F M, Pérez S M, Cadogan J M, Campbell S J 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 175003

    2016

  128. [136]

    Status Solidi A 211 1101

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W D, Wang J L, Muñoz Pérez S, Cadogan J M, Campbell S J 2014 Phys. Status Solidi A 211 1101

    2014

  129. [137]

    Liu E K, Wang W H, Feng L, Zhu W, Li G J, Chen J L, Zhang H W, Wu G H, Jiang C B, Xu H B, de Boer F 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 873

    2012

  130. [138]

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W, Wang J L, Studer A, Wang G, Zhou H B, Ma J, Campbell S J 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 17531

    2019

  131. [139]

    Ren Q Y , Hutchison W D, Wang J L, Studer A J, Campbell S J 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 1324

    2018

  132. [140]

    Landrum G A, Hoffmann R, Evers J, Boysen H 1998 Inorg. Chem. 37 5754

    1998

  133. [141]

    Zhu Y F, Xia Y , Wang Y C, Sheng Y , Yang J, Fu C G, Li A R, Zhu T J, Luo J, Wolverton C, Snyder G J, Liu J J, Zhang W Q 2020 Research 2020 4589786

    2020

  134. [142]

    Today 48 198

    Lin S Q, Li W, Pei Y Z 2021 Mater. Today 48 198

    2021

  135. [143]

    Wang Y X, Lin R X, Zhu P C, Zheng Q H, Wang Q J, Li D Y , Zhu J 2018 Nano Lett. 18 2772

    2018

  136. [144]

    Energy Mater

    Bernges T, Hanus R, Wankmiller B, Imasato K, Lin S Q, Ghidiu M, Gerlitz M, Peterlechner M, Graham S, Hautier G, Pei Y Z, Hansen M R, Wilde G, Snyder G J, George J, Agne M T, Zeier W G 2022 Adv. Energy Mater. 12 2200717

    2022

  137. [145]

    Luo Y X, Yang X L, Feng T L, Wang J Y , Ruan X L 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2554

    2020

  138. [146]

    Simoncelli M, Marzari N, Mauri F 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 809

    2019

  139. [147]

    Mukhopadhyay S, Parker D S, Sales B C, Puretzky A A, McGuire M A, Lindsay L 2018 Science 360 1455

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.