Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 77 references

Single-atom imaging of ${}^{173}$Yb in optical tweezers loaded by a five-beam magneto-optical trap

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates the first single-atom-resolved imaging of the large-spin fermionic isotope 173Yb in optical tweezers, with 99.96% detection fidelity and 98.5% survival, using a two-color scheme in non-magic 532 nm traps loaded…

desk verdict Genuine first demonstration of 173Yb single-atom imaging in tweezers, with a fidelity estimate that carries a real but non-fatal caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07371 v2 pith:J5YLAOHV submitted 2025-05-12 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Omar Abdel Karim , Alessandro Muzi Falconi , Riccardo Panza , Wenliang Liu , Francesco Scazza This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 37.10.De37.10.Gh32.80.Pj
keywords opticaltweezerssingle-atomimagingytterbium-173fermionicatomsfive-beammagneto-opticaltrapnarrow-linecoolingtwo-colornuclearspin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that individual atoms of the fermionic, large-spin ytterbium isotope 173Yb can be trapped in optical tweezers and imaged with single-atom resolution, a capability that had not been demonstrated for this isotope. The trapping is done from a simplified magneto-optical trap that uses five beams instead of six, with gravity replacing the missing downward beam. The imaging uses two colors at once: blue light on the broad 399 nm transition provides the signal and continuously repumps atoms out of dark nuclear-spin states, while green light on the narrow 556 nm transition cools the atom so it stays trapped. The paper reports a single-atom detection fidelity of 99.96(1)% and a survival probability of 98.5(2)% per 50 ms image. A sympathetic reader would take the central result to be that high-spin ytterbium arrays are now practical for quantum simulation and computing, where the I=5/2 nuclear spin gives access to SU(N)-symmetric many-body physics with single-particle readout.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is the five-beam MOT itself: with a narrow-line transition on a heavy atom, the radiation pressure of a single upward beam can be tuned to balance gravity, so the sixth (downward) beam is unnecessary and the top of the apparatus stays open for a high-numerical-aperture objective. The second is the two-color imaging scheme, in which the 399 nm imaging light does double duty as detector and repumper, transferring population from dark $m_F = \pm 5/2$ states into states where the 556 nm molasses light can cool, while the green light keeps the atom trapped during the imaging pulse. A supporting identity is the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition that expresses each $^3P_1|F'=7/2, m'_F\rangle$ light shift of 173Yb as a weighted sum of the measured 174Yb $^3P_1|J'=1, m'_J\rangle$ shifts, which lets the authors predict the non-magic trap shifts they must overcome and use those shifts to homogenize the tweezer array.

What would settle it

Prepare 173Yb atoms selectively in the stretched $m_F=\pm5/2$ ground states and run the identical two-image protocol: if the per-image survival probability is measurably lower than the 98.5(2)% quoted for the mixed ensemble, the assumption of sublevel-independent repumping and survival fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors show that a five-beam MOT operating on the narrow $^1S_0 \to {}^3P_1$ transition at 556 nm loads all common ytterbium isotopes (174Yb, 171Yb, 173Yb) to temperatures of about 9–23 µK and densities near $10^{11}$ atoms/cm³ in under a second, with gravity balancing the radiation pressure of the single upward-directed beam. From such a MOT they load 532 nm optical tweezers and image single 173Yb atoms with a two-color scheme: near-resonant 399 nm light excites the $^1S_0 \to {}^1P_1$ transition for detection while 556 nm light provides molasses cooling, and the blue light acts as a continuous repumper that pulls atoms out of the $m_F = \pm 5/2$ ground states that are otherwise dark to the green cooling light because of large differential light shifts in the non-magic trap. The central quantitative claims are a detection fidelity of 99.96(1)% and a survival probability of 98.5(2)% per 50 ms image, with about 36.8 collected photons per atom. The authors also measure the $m'_F$-dependent differential light shifts of the $^3P_1$ excited states and show that they match predictions obtained by combining measured 174Yb shifts with Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, without an ab initio polarizability model.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the blue 399 nm light fully repumps atoms out of the dark $m_F=\pm5/2$ ground states so that every nuclear-spin sublevel is imaged with the same survival probability; if that equalization is incomplete, the quoted 99.96% fidelity and 98.5% survival would be optimistic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 173Yb can now be loaded into 532 nm tweezer arrays from a five-beam MOT and imaged at the single-atom level, so experiments without six-beam optical access can build high-spin ytterbium arrays.
  • The two-color detection does not require magic-wavelength trapping, meaning the standard 532 nm tweezers and existing high-NA optics are sufficient for large-spin fermionic isotopes.
  • The same two-image protocol yields a detection fidelity above 99.9%, a level suitable for quantum information processing where misread atoms are a dominant error source.
  • Arrays of 173Yb with single-atom readout become a practical starting point for SU(N=6) quantum simulation and for nuclear-spin qudit registers based on the I=5/2 ground-state manifold.
  • The five-beam MOT configuration reduces setup complexity and is compatible with a single high-NA objective, potentially simplifying compact quantum science platforms based on ytterbium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper does not pursue: measuring the two-image fidelity separately for atoms prepared in stretched versus low-$|m_F|$ states would directly test whether the blue repumper fully equalizes sublevel survival, and would bound how much of the quoted fidelity is ensemble averaging.
  • The light-shift calibration method—using the measured shifts of the spinless isotope to predict hyperfine shifts via Clebsch-Gordan coefficients—could be reused at other non-magic wavelengths or for other alkaline-earth-like fermions, avoiding ab initio polarizability calculations.
  • If the 58% single-atom filling for 173Yb (versus 50% for 174Yb) reflects an enhanced light-assisted collision mechanism for high-spin atoms, the same loading protocol might give higher filling fractions for other large-spin species such as 87Sr.
  • Should repeated imaging prove stable over many cycles, 173Yb arrays could support mid-circuit readout and erasure conversion, because the metastable $^3P_0$ clock state provides a long-lived ancilla and the nuclear spin gives six addressable levels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript describes two experimental advances: a five-beam narrow-line magneto-optical trap for ytterbium in which the downward beam is replaced by gravity, and the first single-atom-resolved imaging of the fermionic isotope 173Yb (I = 5/2) in 532 nm optical tweezers. The authors characterize the five-beam MOT for 174Yb, 171Yb, and 173Yb, including loading rates, lifetimes, temperatures, and densities, and support the MOT behavior with Monte Carlo simulations. For 173Yb they implement a two-color imaging scheme (399 nm detection with 556 nm molasses cooling) that works despite large, sublevel-dependent differential light shifts, measure those shifts by blow-out spectroscopy, and validate a Clebsch-Gordan-weighted prediction based on 174Yb data to better than 2%. The reported single-atom detection fidelity is 99.96(1)% with a survival probability of 98.5(2)%, extracted from a two-image correlation analysis with bootstrapped errors.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a timely and useful advance: 173Yb is the natural candidate for SU(N) quantum simulation with N = 6, and single-atom-resolved tweezer arrays of 173Yb have not previously been demonstrated. The two-color, non-magic-wavelength imaging scheme directly addresses a real obstacle, and the five-beam MOT is a practical simplification that will likely benefit other ytterbium experiments using high-NA objectives. The manuscript is quantitatively thorough: Monte Carlo simulations reproduce MOT cloud shapes and stability trends, the light-shift comparison is an elegant consistency check, and the fidelity and survival estimates are based on joint photon-count statistics with bootstrapped uncertainties. The main caveat, that the quoted fidelity might apply only to a bright subpopulation, is largely mitigated by the fact that the 1S0-1P1 detection transition is insensitive to mF in the ground state (J = 0), so all sublevels scatter the 399 nm light; the manuscript would nonetheless benefit from stating this explicitly, as detailed in Minor Comment 2.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Appendix F] Please provide the explicit equations of the two-image model that relate the four joint-count probabilities to the loading fraction, detection fidelity, and survival probability, and report the fitted loading fraction; the current description is purely verbal and calls the procedure 'model-free' despite the underlying three-parameter model.
  2. [Section III] Please add a sentence noting that the 1S0-1P1 detection transition is insensitive to mF because the 1S0 ground state has J = 0, so all mF sublevels scatter the 399 nm light; the mF = ±5/2 'dark' states are dark only to the 556 nm cooling light. This would explicitly preempt the concern that a subpopulation of occupied sites could remain below threshold in both images.
  3. [Fig. 5(a) and Appendix F] Please state whether the quoted uncertainties are purely statistical (bootstrap) or include the systematic uncertainty from choosing the photon-count threshold and the operating intensity on the same dataset; if purely statistical, add a sentence on the expected optimistic bias from this selection.
  4. [Introduction] The claim that 173Yb atoms 'have yet to be individually trapped or imaged' should be qualified as 'in optical tweezer arrays' to avoid ambiguity with lattice-based quantum gas microscopy of ytterbium.
  5. [Fig. 4(d) and Section III] Please state explicitly that the <2% agreement between measured and predicted 173Yb light shifts is a consistency check of the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition rather than an independent prediction, because the input 174Yb shifts are measured on the same apparatus and the polarizability corrections in Appendix E are partly fixed by those measurements.
  6. [Appendix B] The duplicated word in 'the magnetic quadrupole field where where horizontal confinement is less robust' should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are empirical demonstrations, and the 173Yb light-shift comparison is an independent consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing results are experimental demonstrations: loading ytterbium isotopes from a five-beam MOT and performing two-color single-atom imaging of 173Yb. The imaging fidelity and survival probability in Section III and Appendix F are estimated from two successive images with a photon-count threshold chosen to maximize the global fidelity; this is a standard empirical estimator, not a derivation from an assumed input. The paper explicitly describes the procedure as model-free and openly accounts for known loss channels. The potential limitation that atoms in mF=±5/2 ground states could remain dark in both images and be misclassified as voids is an identifiability caveat of the two-image method, not circularity, because the fidelity is measured from thresholded photon-count correlations rather than derived from the assumption that no such dark subpopulation exists. The 173Yb differential light shifts in Figure 4(d) and Appendix E are called 'predicted' but are constructed from separately measured 174Yb light shifts via Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and are then compared with independent 173Yb measurements, agreeing within 2%; this is a cross-isotope consistency check, not a fit of the target quantity. The two calibration offsets in Appendix E are anchored to external data, namely the static polarizability of Ref. [75] and the experimentally known 532-nm magic wavelength, and the adjusted model successfully predicts the independently measured 487-nm magic wavelength of Ref. [32]. Self-citations such as Refs. [4,20,21] provide context and are not load-bearing for the central claims. I therefore find no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an experimental capability, so the ledger's main entries are domain assumptions about the fidelity analysis, single-occupancy preparation, and the light-shift model. There are no invented physical entities. Two polarizability offsets in Appendix E are treated as free parameters because they are chosen to match known constraints, though they do not enter the imaging-fidelity claim directly.

free parameters (4)
  • 1S0 static polarizability correction = -1.4 Hz cm^2/W
    Appendix E: offset added to align the model polarizability with the static value from Ref. 75; used in the auxiliary light-shift model, not in the fidelity measurement.
  • 3P1 polarizability offset = -0.15 Hz cm^2/W
    Appendix E: offset applied to make the model reproduce the 532 nm magic wavelength for 174Yb; calibrates the model to known data.
  • MOT beam parameters per isotope (intensities and detunings) = e.g., 174Yb: I_HOR=220 I_s, I_VER=3 I_s; 171Yb: 60 I_s, 4 I_s; 173Yb: 200 I_s, 6 I_s (Fig. 3a)
    Experimental control settings chosen for each isotope; they affect loading efficiency but not the measured imaging fidelity.
  • Photon-count threshold = Set to maximize global fidelity (Fig. 5b)
    Threshold chosen from the same data used to report fidelity; standard model-free two-image analysis, but can bias fidelity upward if overfit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Wigner-Eckart theorem plus Clebsch-Gordan decomposition of |F,mF> in terms of |J,mJ;I,mI> gives 173Yb polarizabilities as weighted sums of 174Yb values, with hyperfine interaction in the excited 3P1 state neglected.
    Appendix E, Eq. E5; used to turn measured 174Yb light shifts into predicted 173Yb shifts; agreement within 2% is the evidence.
  • domain assumption After the 50 ms light-assisted collision pulse, each tweezer contains at most one atom.
    Section III and Appendix A; if multiple atoms remained in a site, the two-image fidelity extraction would not isolate single-atom behavior.
  • domain assumption Detection and loss in the first and second images are conditionally independent given atom presence, and survival is the same for all magnetic sublevels interrogated by the imaging cycle.
    Appendix F; the paper notes mF=±5/2 are dark to green cooling and relies on the blue beam to repump them, so sublevel nonuniformity is the main risk to this assumption.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo MOT simulations may use a 174Yb-like spin structure and ignore density-dependent and background losses.
    Appendix B; these simulations support the qualitative 5B MOT picture but are not used to establish the imaging fidelity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-atom imaging of ${}^{173}$Yb in optical tweezers loaded by a five-beam magneto-optical trap." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J5YLAOHV

@misc{pith2026250507371,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-atom imaging of $^173$Yb in optical tweezers loaded by a five-beam magneto-optical trap},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J5YLAOHV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07371}
}
abstract

We report on the trapping and imaging of individual ytterbium atoms in arrays of optical tweezers, loaded from a magneto-optical trap (MOT) formed by only five beams in an orthogonal configuration. In our five-beam MOT, operating on the narrow ${}^1$S${}_0 \rightarrow {}^3$P${}_1$ intercombination transition, gravity balances the radiation pressure of a single upward-directed beam. This approach enables efficient trapping and cooling of the most common ytterbium isotopes (${}^{171}$Yb, ${}^{173}$Yb and ${}^{174}$Yb) to $\lesssim 20\,\mu$K at densities $\sim 10^{11}$ atoms/cm$^3$ within less than one second. This configuration allows for significantly reducing the complexity of the optical setup, potentially benefiting any ytterbium-atom based quantum science platform leveraging single-atom microscopy, from quantum processors to novel optical clocks. We then demonstrate the first single-atom-resolved imaging of the fermionic, large-spin isotope ${}^{173}$Yb ($I=5/2$), employing a two-color imaging scheme that does not rely on magic-wavelength trapping. We achieve a high single-atom detection fidelity of $99.96(1)\%$ and a large survival probability of $98.5(2)\%$, despite large differential light shifts affecting all nuclear spin sublevels of the excited ${}^3$P${}_1$ state involved in the cooling transition. The demonstrated capabilities will play a key role in future quantum simulations and computing applications with ${}^{173}$Yb arrays.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07371 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Overview of the five-beam MOT and trapping of ytterbium atoms in optical tweezers. (a) Narrow-line MOT operating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Five-beam MOT loading and stability for bosonic and fermionic isotopes. (a) Atom number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (c), where the measured relative atom number is plotted as a function of the blow-out pulse detuning from the free-space 1S0 |F = 5/2⟩ → 3P1 |F ′ = 7/2⟩ resonance. Here, the tweezer polarization is aligned along the quantization B-field, suppressing any vector light sh…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Single-atom imaging of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time diagram of the experimental sequence for trapping and imaging single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Monte Carlo simulations of the five-beam MOT. (a) Fraction of atoms trapped in the MOT as a function of the vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Tweezer amplitude homogenization. (a) Optical tweezers are produced using an AOD. The intermediate tweezers, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. V. Gorshkov, A. M. Rey, A. J. Daley, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin,Alkaline-Earth-Metal Atoms as Few-Qubit Quantum Registers, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 110503 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Shibata, S

    K. Shibata, S. Kato, A. Yamaguchi, S. Uetake, and Y. Takahashi,A scalable quantum computer with ultranarrow optical transition of ultracold neutral atoms in an optical lattice, Appl. Phys. B97, 753 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    A. J. Daley,Quantum computing and quantum simulation with group-II atoms, Quant. Inf. Proc.10, 865 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Pagano, F

    G. Pagano, F. Scazza, and M. Foss-Feig,Fast and Scalable Quantum Information Processing with Two-Electron Atoms in Optical Tweezer Arrays, Adv. Quantum Tech.2, 1800067 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres,High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 857 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Y. Wu, S. Kolkowitz, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson,Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays, Nat. Comm.13, 4657 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    N. Chen, L. Li, W. Huie, M. Zhao, I. Vetter, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Covey,Analyzing the Rydberg-based optical-metastable- ground architecture for171Yb nuclear spins, Phys. Rev. A105, 052438 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Sahay, J

    K. Sahay, J. Jin, J. Claes, J. D. Thompson, and S. Puri,High-Threshold Codes for Neutral-Atom Qubits with Biased Erasure Errors, Phys. Rev. X13, 041013 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Jia, W. Huie, L. Li, W. K. C. Sun, X. Hu, Aakash, H. Kogan, A. Karve, J. Y. Lee, and J. P. Covey,An architecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium-171 atoms, npj Quantum Inf.10, 106 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt,Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    W. F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R. J. Fasano, S. A. Schäffer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi, R. C. Brown, N. Hinkley, G. Milani, M. Schioppo, T. H. Yoon, and A. D. Ludlow, Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level, 16 Nature 564, 87 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Oelker, R

    E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonderhouse, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J. M. Robinson, G. E. Marti, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye,Demonstration of 4.8× 10−17 stability at 1s for two independent opti...

    2019

  5. [13]

    Zheng, J

    X. Zheng, J. Dolde, V. Lochab, B. N. Merriman, H. Li, and S. Kolkowitz,Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock, Nature 602, 425 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    L. Hu, N. Poli, L. Salvi, and G. M. Tino,Atom Interferometry with the Sr Optical Clock Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 263601 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Rudolph, T

    J. Rudolph, T. Wilkason, M. Nantel, H. Swan, C. M. Holland, Y. Jiang, B. E. Garber, S. P. Carman, and J. M. Hogan, Large Momentum Transfer Clock Atom Interferometry on the 689 nm Intercombination Line of Strontium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 083604 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    A. V. Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Two-orbital SU(N) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Phys.6 (2010), 10.1038/nphys1535

    2010 doi

  9. [17]

    M. A. Cazalilla and A. M. Rey,Ultracold Fermi gases with emergent SU(N) symmetry, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 124401 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Zhang, Y

    R. Zhang, Y. Cheng, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai,Controlling the interaction of ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 213 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    F. M. Surace, P. Fromholz, N. D. Oppong, M. Dalmonte, and M. Aidelsburger,Ab Initio Derivation of Lattice-Gauge- Theory Dynamics for Cold Gases in Optical Lattices, PRX Quantum4, 020330 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    F. M. Surace, P. Fromholz, F. Scazza, and M. Dalmonte,Scalable, ab initio protocol for quantum simulating SU(N)×U(1) Lattice Gauge Theories, Quantum 8, 1359 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Scazza, C

    F. Scazza, C. Hofrichter, M. Höfer, P. C. De Groot, I. Bloch, and S. Fölling,Observation of two-orbital spin-exchange interactions with ultracold SU(N)-symmetric fermions, Nature Phys.10, 779 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Bishof, S. L. Bromley, C. V. Kraus, M. S. Safronova, P. Zoller, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye,Spectroscopic observation of SU(N)-symmetric interactions in Sr orbital magnetism, Science 345, 1467 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Cappellini, M

    G. Cappellini, M. Mancini, G. Pagano, P. Lombardi, L. Livi, M. Siciliani de Cumis, P. Cancio, M. Pizzocaro, D. Calonico, F. Levi, C. Sias, J. Catani, M. Inguscio, and L. Fallani, Direct Observation of Coherent Interorbital Spin-Exchange Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 120402 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Riegger, N

    L. Riegger, N. Darkwah Oppong, M. Höfer, D. R. Fernandes, I. Bloch, and S. Fölling,Localized Magnetic Moments with Tunable Spin Exchange in a Gas of Ultracold Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 143601 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Kanász-Nagy, Y

    M. Kanász-Nagy, Y. Ashida, T. Shi, C. P. Moca, T. N. Ikeda, S. Fölling, J. I. Cirac, G. Zaránd, and E. A. Demler, Exploring the anisotropic Kondo model in and out of equilibrium with alkaline-earth atoms, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155156 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Abeln, K

    B. Abeln, K. Sponselee, M. Diem, N. Pintul, K. Sengstock, and C. Becker,Interorbital interactions in anSU(2)× SU(6)- symmetric Fermi-Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A103, 033315 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Cooper, J

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres,Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. X8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman,Microscopic Control and Detection of Ultracold Strontium in Optical- Tweezer Arrays, Phys. Rev. X8, 041054 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Saskin, J

    S. Saskin, J. T. Wilson, B. Grinkemeyer, and J. D. Thompson,Narrow-Line Cooling and Imaging of Ytterbium Atoms in an Optical Tweezer Array, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 143002 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, and M. Endres,2000-Times Repeated Imaging of Strontium Atoms in Clock-Magic Tweezer Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 173201 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Jenkins, J

    A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman,Ytterbium Nuclear-Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array, Phys. Rev. X12, 021027 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    S. Ma, A. P. Burgers, G. Liu, J. Wilson, B. Zhang, and J. D. Thompson,Universal Gate Operations on Nuclear Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array of171Yb Atoms, Phys. Rev. X12, 021028 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    W. Huie, L. Li, N. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. K. C. Sun, and J. P. Covey,Repetitive Readout and Real-Time Control of Nuclear Spin Qubits in171Yb Atoms, PRX Quantum4, 030337 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    M. A. Norcia, W. B. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, A. Brown, M. O. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, A. M. W. Jones, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, J. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. Mc...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Nakamura, T

    Y. Nakamura, T. Kusano, R. Yokoyama, K. Saito, K. Higashi, N. Ozawa, T. Takano, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi,Hybrid Atom Tweezer Array of Nuclear Spin and Optical Clock Qubits, Phys. Rev. X14, 041062 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    R. Tao, M. Ammenwerth, F. Gyger, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher,High-Fidelity Detection of Large-Scale Atom Arrays in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 013401 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature 622, 279 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Scholl, A

    P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres,Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature 622, 273 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. Rönchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman,Midcircuit Operations Using the omg 17 Architecture in Neutral Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, A. L. Shaw, J. P. Covey, V. Schkolnik, T. H. Yoon, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres,An Atomic-Array Optical Clock with Single-Atom Readout, Phys. Rev. X9, 041052 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, E. Oelker, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman,Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array, Science 366, 93 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, W. R. Milner, D. Kedar, M. A. Norcia, E. Oelker, N. Schine, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock, Nature 588, 408 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Darkwah Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman,Multi-qubit gates and Schrödinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature 634, 315 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    A. L. Shaw, R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, P. Scholl, T. H. Yoon, J. Choi, and M. Endres,Multi-ensemble metrology by programming local rotations with atom movements, Nat. Phys.20, 195 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Finkelstein, R

    R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, X. Sun, P. Scholl, S. Direkci, T. Gefen, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, and M. Endres,Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks, Nature 634, 321 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch,Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye,Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni,Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Ilzhöfer, G

    P. Ilzhöfer, G. Durastante, A. Patscheider, A. Trautmann, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino,Two-species five-beam magneto- optical trap for erbium and dysprosium, Phys. Rev. A97, 023633 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    D. S. Grün, S. J. M. White, A. Ortu, A. Di Carli, H. Edri, M. Lepers, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino,Optical Tweezer Arrays of Erbium Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 223402 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Yamamoto, J

    R. Yamamoto, J. Kobayashi, T. Kuno, K. Kato, and Y. Takahashi,An ytterbium quantum gas microscope with narrow-line laser cooling, New J. Phys.18, 023016 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Urech, I

    A. Urech, I. H. A. Knottnerus, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and F. Schreck,Narrow-line imaging of single strontium atoms in shallow optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023245 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Plotkin-Swing, A

    B. Plotkin-Swing, A. Wirth, D. Gochnauer, T. Rahman, K. E. McAlpine, and S. Gupta,Crossed-beam slowing to enhance narrow-line ytterbium magneto-optic traps, Rev. Sci. Instr.91, 093201 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Lunden, L

    W. Lunden, L. Du, M. Cantara, P. Barral, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle,Enhancing the capture velocity of a Dy magneto-optical trap with two-stage slowing, Phys. Rev. A101, 063403 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    B. Seo, P. Chen, Z. Chen, W. Yuan, M. Huang, S. Du, and G.-B. Jo, Efficient production of a narrow-line erbium magneto-optical trap with two-stage slowing, Phys. Rev. A102, 013319 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Mukaiyama, H

    T. Mukaiyama, H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Li, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami,Recoil-Limited Laser Cooling of87Sr Atoms near the Fermi Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 113002 (2003)

    2003

  49. [57]

    Stellmer, F

    S. Stellmer, F. Schreck, and T. C. Killian,Degenerate Quantum Gases of Strontium, in Annu. Rev. Cold Atoms Mol. (2014) Chap. Chapter 1, pp. 1–80

    2014

  50. [58]

    Fluctuations of the radiation force from the vertical upward beam are enhanced by the optical pumping processes within the large nuclear spin structure of 173Yb, where the transitions associated with each nuclear spin state of the ground manifold feature widely different line ...

  51. [59]

    Maruyama, R

    R. Maruyama, R. H. Wynar, M. V. Romalis, A. Andalkar, M. D. Swallows, C. E. Pearson, and E. N. Fortson,Investigation of sub-Doppler cooling in an ytterbium magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. A68, 011403 (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    Grunzweig, A

    T. Grunzweig, A. Hilliard, M. McGovern, and M. Andersen,Near-deterministic preparation of a single atom in an optical microtrap, Nat. Phys.6, 951 (2011)

    2011

  53. [61]

    M. O. Brown, T. Thiele, C. Kiehl, T.-W. Hsu, and C. A. Regal,Gray-Molasses Optical-Tweezer Loading: Controlling Collisions for Scaling Atom-Array Assembly, Phys. Rev. X9, 011057 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    D. A. Steck,Quantum and Atom Optics, https://atomoptics.uoregon.edu/~dsteck/teaching/quantum-optics/

  55. [63]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk,Bichromatic Imaging of Single Molecules in an Optical Tweezer Array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 053202 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Kuwamoto, K

    T. Kuwamoto, K. Honda, Y. Takahashi, and T. Yabuzaki,Magneto-optical trapping of Yb atoms using an intercombination transition, Phys. Rev. A60, R745 (1999)

    1999

  57. [65]

    Snigirev, A

    S. Snigirev, A. J. Park, A. Heinz, I. Bloch, and S. Blatt,Fast and dense magneto-optical traps for strontium, Phys. Rev. A 99, 063421 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland,Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  59. [67]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Beloy, Y. S. Hassan, W. F. McGrew, C.-C. Chen, J. L. Siegel, T. Grogan, and A. D. Ludlow,Subrecoil Clock-Transition Laser Cooling Enabling Shallow Optical Lattice Clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 113202 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Omanakuttan, A

    S. Omanakuttan, A. Mitra, M. J. Martin, and I. H. Deutsch,Quantum optimal control of ten-level nuclear spin qudits in 87Sr, Phys. Rev. A104, L060401 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    González-Cuadra, T

    D. González-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, J. Carrasco, B. Kraus, and P. Zoller, Hardware Efficient Quantum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 160501 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Ahmed, A

    H. Ahmed, A. Litvinov, P. Guesdon, E. Maréchal, J. H. Huckans, B. Pasquiou, B. Laburthe-Tolra, and M. R. de Saint- Vincent, Coherent control over the high-dimensional space of the nuclear spin of alkaline-earth atoms, arXiv:2501.01731

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hofrichter, L

    C. Hofrichter, L. Riegger, F. Scazza, M. Höfer, D. R. Fernandes, I. Bloch, and S. Fölling,Direct Probing of the Mott Crossover in theSU(N) Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X6, 021030 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Pasqualetti, O

    G. Pasqualetti, O. Bettermann, N. Darkwah Oppong, E. Ibarra-García-Padilla, S. Dasgupta, R. T. Scalettar, K. R. A. 18 Hazzard, I. Bloch, and S. Fölling, Equation of State and Thermometry of the 2DSU(N) Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 083401 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Joykutty, V

    J. Joykutty, V. Mathur, V. Venkataraman, and V. Natarajan,Direct Measurement of the Oscillation Frequency in an Optical-Tweezers Trap by Parametric Excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 193902 (2005)

    2005

  66. [74]

    Grimm, M

    R. Grimm, M. Weidemüller, and Y. B. Ovchinnikov, Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms, in Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, Vol. 42 (Elsevier, 2000) pp. 95–170

    2000

  67. [75]

    V. A. Dzuba and A. Derevianko,Dynamic polarizabilities and related properties of clock states of the ytterbium atom, J. Phys. B 43, 074011 (2010)

    2010

  68. [76]

    Holman, Y

    A. Holman, Y. Xu, X. Sun, J. Wu, M. Wang, B. Seo, N. Yu, and S. Will,Trapping of Single Atoms in Metasurface Optical Tweezer Arrays, arXiv:2411.05321

  69. [77]

    Kostylev, E

    N. Kostylev, E. Ivanov, M. E. Tobar, and J. J. McFerran,Sub-Doppler cooling of ytterbium with the1S0− 1P1 transition including 171Yb (I=1/2), J. Opt. Soc. Am. B31, 1614 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.