Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Injecting Knowledge Graphs into Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.07554 v1 pith:OAQG2PBC submitted 2025-05-12 cs.LG cs.IR

classification cs.LGcs.IR
keywords knowledgellmsmodelsreasoninggraphgraphslanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Integrating structured knowledge from Knowledge Graphs (KGs) into Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a key challenge for symbolic reasoning. Existing methods mainly rely on prompt engineering or fine-tuning, which lose structural fidelity or incur high computational costs. Building on recent encoding techniques which integrate graph embeddings within the LLM input as tokens, we extend this paradigm to the KG domain by leveraging Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) models, thus enabling graph-aware reasoning. Our approach is model-agnostic, resource-efficient, and compatible with any LLMs. Extensive experimentation on synthetic and real-world datasets shows that our method improves reasoning performance over established baselines, further achieving the best trade-off in terms of accuracy and efficiency against state-of-the-art LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Matching Game Preferences Through Dialogical Large Language Models: A Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This perspective paper proposes the D-LLM framework, which couples the authors' GRAPHYP knowledge graphs with LLMs to personalize AI responses and make reasoning traceable, but no empirical validation is presented.

Pith tools