pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.07794 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-12 · ✦ hep-th

Disparity in sound speeds: implications for elastic unitarity and the effective potential in quantum field theory theory

Dmitry S. Ageev , Yulia A. Ageeva This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords anisotropic sound speedselastic unitarityscattering amplitudephase space kerneleffective potentialGildener-Weinberg mechanismrenormalization groupangular momentum mixing
0
0 comments X

The pith

In scalar field theories with unequal sound speeds, elastic unitarity defines a positive phase-space kernel on the sphere that bounds eigenvalues of the rescaled amplitude and modifies the one-loop effective potential.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the exact elastic two-body unitarity relation for scalars with direction-dependent propagation speeds. It shows that the resulting phase space forms a positive kernel on the sphere, so the scattering amplitude functions as an operator in angular-momentum space whose eigenvalues are subject to unitarity constraints. In the weak-anisotropy limit this produces explicit s-d mixing. For a two-scalar quartic model the authors confirm the anisotropic optical theorem at one loop and obtain coupled-channel bounds. They further compute the local one-loop effective potential, finding that the classically scale-invariant Gildener-Weinberg flat direction survives while anisotropy alters the radiatively generated scalon mass, with additional analytic results and an extra RG invariant in the isotropic but unequal-velocity case.

Core claim

The central claim is that inequivalent spatial kinetic tensors for different scalars produce a modified two-body phase space that defines a positive kernel on the sphere. Consequently the scattering amplitude acts as an operator in angular-momentum space whose eigenvalues are constrained by unitarity. In the weak-anisotropy regime the leading correction induces s-d mixing. For the two-scalar quartic theory the one-loop optical theorem holds and coupled-channel bounds follow. The one-loop effective potential preserves the Gildener-Weinberg flat direction yet modifies the scalon mass, while the isotropic unequal-velocity limit yields analytic expressions and an additional RG invariant ray.

What carries the argument

The phase-space kernel on the sphere that turns the scattering amplitude into an operator in angular-momentum space and supplies the positive kernel for unitarity bounds.

If this is right

  • Unitarity directly constrains the eigenvalues of the phase-space-rescaled amplitude.
  • Weak anisotropy produces leading-order s-d mixing in the partial-wave expansion.
  • The two-scalar quartic model satisfies the anisotropic optical theorem at one loop and admits coupled-channel elastic bounds.
  • The Gildener-Weinberg flat direction remains intact, but anisotropy shifts the radiatively generated scalon mass.
  • In the isotropic unequal-velocity limit several quantities become analytic and the RG flow acquires an extra invariant ray.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kernel construction could be applied to theories with more scalar fields to generate new mixing patterns among higher partial waves.
  • Direction-dependent propagation speeds in condensed-matter analogs might furnish laboratory tests of the predicted eigenvalue bounds.
  • The modified RG structure raises the possibility of additional fixed-point rays or flows in broader classes of anisotropic models.
  • Early-universe scenarios with varying effective sound speeds could inherit similar corrections to radiatively generated masses.

Load-bearing premise

The explicit leading correction requires the weak-anisotropy regime together with the assumption that the two-scalar quartic model remains perturbatively controllable at one loop while preserving classical scale invariance.

What would settle it

A direct evaluation of the two-body phase-space integral that fails to yield a positive kernel on the sphere, or a one-loop effective-potential computation that leaves the scalon mass unchanged under anisotropy, would refute the central results.

read the original abstract

We study interacting scalar field theories in which different fields propagate with inequivalent spatial kinetic tensors, corresponding to different sound speeds in different directions. We derive the exact elastic two-body unitarity relation and show that the phase space defines a positive kernel on the sphere, so that the scattering amplitude acts as an operator in angular-momentum space. The corresponding unitarity bounds constrain the eigenvalues of the phase-space-rescaled amplitude. In the weak-anisotropy regime, we obtain the leading correction explicitly and show that it induces $s-d$ mixing. For a two-scalar quartic model, we verify the anisotropic optical theorem at one loop and derive coupled channel elastic unitarity bounds. We also compute the local one-loop effective potential and analyze the corresponding one-loop renormalization-group structure. In the classically scale-invariant limit, the Gildener-Weinberg flat direction is unchanged, whereas anisotropy modifies the radiatively generated scalon mass. In the isotropic but unequal-velocity limit, several results become analytic and the RG flow exhibits an additional invariant ray.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies interacting scalar field theories with inequivalent spatial kinetic tensors, leading to direction-dependent sound speeds. It derives the exact elastic two-body unitarity relation and shows that the phase space defines a positive kernel on the sphere, so the scattering amplitude acts as an operator in angular-momentum space whose eigenvalues are constrained by unitarity bounds. In the weak-anisotropy regime the leading correction is obtained explicitly and shown to induce s-d mixing. For a two-scalar quartic model the anisotropic optical theorem is verified at one loop, the local one-loop effective potential is computed, and the renormalization-group structure is analyzed. In the classically scale-invariant limit the Gildener-Weinberg flat direction remains unchanged while anisotropy modifies the radiatively generated scalon mass; analytic results appear in the isotropic but unequal-velocity limit.

Significance. If the positivity of the phase-space kernel holds for arbitrary sound-speed tensors, the work supplies a useful operator-theoretic formulation of unitarity in anisotropic QFTs together with concrete one-loop checks and RG implications for scale-invariant models. The explicit verification of the optical theorem and the identification of an additional RG invariant ray are positive features. The restriction of explicit bounds and mixing calculations to the weak-anisotropy regime, however, leaves the general applicability of the operator interpretation and the resulting constraints on the effective potential less firmly established.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and the section deriving the unitarity relation: the claim that the phase-space integral defines a positive kernel on the sphere for arbitrary sound-speed tensors (enabling the operator interpretation and eigenvalue bounds) is presented as exact, yet the explicit positivity argument, the leading correction, and the s-d mixing are obtained only in the weak-anisotropy regime. Because this positivity is load-bearing for the central unitarity bounds and their implications for the effective potential, a demonstration or counter-example for O(1) sound-speed ratios is required.
  2. Section on the Gildener-Weinberg analysis and one-loop effective potential: the statement that the flat direction is unchanged is tied to preservation of classical scale invariance at one loop, but the quantitative modification of the scalon mass by anisotropy is stated without explicit expressions or error estimates, making it difficult to assess the size of the effect relative to the isotropic case.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title contains the repeated phrase 'quantum field theory theory'; this typographical error should be corrected.
  2. The additional invariant ray in the isotropic unequal-velocity limit is noted; a brief plot of the RG trajectories would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. Below we address each of the major comments in detail. We believe these responses and the associated revisions will clarify the points raised and strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the section deriving the unitarity relation: the claim that the phase-space integral defines a positive kernel on the sphere for arbitrary sound-speed tensors (enabling the operator interpretation and eigenvalue bounds) is presented as exact, yet the explicit positivity argument, the leading correction, and the s-d mixing are obtained only in the weak-anisotropy regime. Because this positivity is load-bearing for the central unitarity bounds and their implications for the effective potential, a demonstration or counter-example for O(1) sound-speed ratios is required.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. The elastic unitarity relation is derived exactly without approximation, and the phase-space kernel is positive for arbitrary sound-speed tensors by construction: it arises as the integral of positive delta-functions enforcing on-shell conditions and energy-momentum conservation over the sphere, with the direction-dependent velocities entering only through the kinematics but not affecting the positivity of the measure. The explicit expansion of the kernel, the leading correction, and the demonstration of s-d mixing are indeed performed in the weak-anisotropy regime to obtain analytic expressions. The operator interpretation and the resulting eigenvalue bounds therefore hold generally, with the weak-anisotropy results serving as a concrete illustration. To address the referee's concern, we will add a short paragraph in the relevant section emphasizing that the positivity argument is general and does not rely on the weak-anisotropy assumption, while the explicit calculations are perturbative. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Section on the Gildener-Weinberg analysis and one-loop effective potential: the statement that the flat direction is unchanged is tied to preservation of classical scale invariance at one loop, but the quantitative modification of the scalon mass by anisotropy is stated without explicit expressions or error estimates, making it difficult to assess the size of the effect relative to the isotropic case.

    Authors: We agree that providing more quantitative detail would improve the manuscript. The preservation of the Gildener-Weinberg flat direction follows directly from the fact that the one-loop effective potential respects the classical scale invariance when the tree-level potential is scale-invariant, and this holds independently of the anisotropy in the kinetic terms. The modification to the scalon mass arises from the anisotropic contributions to the loop integrals. In the manuscript we discuss this modification and provide analytic results in the isotropic but unequal-velocity limit. To make the effect more concrete, we will include the explicit one-loop expression for the scalon mass in the general case (or at least the leading anisotropic correction) along with a brief comparison to the isotropic result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: unitarity derivation and kernel positivity are obtained directly from anisotropic kinematics without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper derives the elastic two-body unitarity relation and the positive kernel property of the phase-space measure from the anisotropic sound-speed tensors and on-shell kinematics as an exact statement, then verifies the optical theorem at one loop in the explicit quartic model. The weak-anisotropy expansion is introduced only for concrete leading corrections and s-d mixing, not as the basis for the general operator interpretation or bounds. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatze smuggled via prior work appear in the derivation chain. The Gildener-Weinberg analysis and RG flow are likewise computed from the one-loop effective potential with stated assumptions that do not presuppose the unitarity bounds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard perturbative QFT assumptions plus the specific choice of anisotropic kinetic tensors; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Scalar fields propagate with inequivalent spatial kinetic tensors corresponding to different sound speeds.
    This is the defining setup of the theories under study and enters all derivations.
  • domain assumption The theory remains perturbatively valid at one loop in the weak-anisotropy regime.
    Required for the explicit leading correction and one-loop effective potential computation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1385 out tokens · 43211 ms · 2026-05-22T15:46:10.218777+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the phase space defines a positive kernel on the sphere, so that the scattering amplitude acts as an operator in angular-momentum space... ea(E) ≡ G(E)^{1/2} a(E) G(E)^{1/2}... ℑλ_n = |λ_n|^2, |ℜλ_n| ≤ 1/2

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Effective Field Theory of Inflation

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, JHEP03, 014 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014 [arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014 2008

  2. [2]

    k-Inflation

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett. B458, 209-218 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9904075 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6 1999

  3. [3]

    Perturbations in k-inflation

    J. Garriga and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett. B458, 219-225 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00602-4 [arXiv:hep-th/9904176 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00602-4 1999

  4. [4]

    DBI in the Sky

    M. Alishahiha, E. Silverstein and D. Tong, Phys. Rev. D70, 123505 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123505 [arXiv:hep-th/0404084 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123505 2004

  5. [5]

    G-inflation: inflation driven by the Galileon field

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 231302 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.231302 [arXiv:1008.0603 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.231302 2010

  6. [6]

    Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys.126, 511-529 (2011) doi:10.1143/PTP.126.511 [arXiv:1105.5723 [hep-th]]. – 38 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1143/ptp.126.511 2011

  7. [7]

    Galilean Genesis: an alternative to inflation

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and E. Trincherini, JCAP11, 021 (2010) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/11/021 [arXiv:1007.0027 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/11/021 2010

  8. [8]

    DBI Realizations of the Pseudo-Conformal Universe and Galilean Genesis Scenarios

    K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce, J. Khoury and G. E. J. Miller, JCAP12, 030 (2012) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/030 [arXiv:1209.5742 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/030 2012

  9. [9]

    Inflation from Minkowski Space

    D. Pirtskhalava, L. Santoni, E. Trincherini and P. Uttayarat, JHEP12, 151 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)151 [arXiv:1410.0882 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)151 2014

  10. [10]

    Ijjas and P

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) no.12, 121304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.121304 [arXiv:1606.08880 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.121304 2016

  11. [11]

    Cosmological bounce and Genesis beyond Horndeski

    R. Kolevatov, S. Mironov, N. Sukhov and V. Volkova, JCAP08, 038 (2017) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/038 [arXiv:1705.06626 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/038 2017

  12. [12]

    Bounce beyond Horndeski with GR asymptotics and $\gamma$-crossing

    S. Mironov, V. Rubakov and V. Volkova, JCAP10(2018), 050 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/050 [arXiv:1807.08361 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/050 2018

  13. [13]

    Ageeva, P

    Y. Ageeva, P. Petrov and V. Rubakov, JHEP01(2023), 026 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)026 [arXiv:2207.04071 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)026 2023

  14. [14]

    Y. A. Ageeva and P. K. Petrov, Phys. Usp.66(2023) no.11, 1134-1141 doi:10.3367/UFNe.2022.11.039259 [arXiv:2206.03516 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.3367/ufne.2022.11.039259 2023

  15. [15]

    Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, JCAP10, 026 (2010) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026 [arXiv:1008.0048 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026 2010

  16. [16]

    D. A. Dobre, A. V. Frolov, J. T. Gálvez Ghersi, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman, JCAP03, 020 (2018) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/020 [arXiv:1712.10272 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/020 2018

  17. [17]

    Recovering P(X) from a canonical complex field

    E. Babichev, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman, JCAP11, 023 (2018) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/023 [arXiv:1807.10281 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/023 2018

  18. [18]

    Ageeva and P

    Y. Ageeva and P. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 4 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043527 [arXiv:2310.18402 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.043527 2024

  19. [19]

    Gil Choi, P

    H. Gil Choi, P. Petrov and M. Yamaguchi, JHEP08(2025), 044 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025)044 [arXiv:2503.02626 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)044 2025

  20. [20]

    Dankovsky, E

    I. Dankovsky, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman, JCAP09, 047 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/047 [arXiv:2406.17053 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/047 2024

  21. [21]

    Dankovsky, S

    I. Dankovsky, S. Ramazanov, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov and A. Vikman, JCAP02, 064 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/064 [arXiv:2410.21971 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/064 2025

  22. [22]

    Babichev, I

    E. Babichev, I. Dankovsky, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman, [arXiv:2504.07902 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Ambegaokar V, deGennes P G, Rainer DPhys. Rev. A92676 (1974)

    work page 1974

  24. [24]

    Ticknor C, Wilson R M, Bohn J LPhys. Rev. Lett.106065301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Blaschke D NJournal of Physics: Condensed Matter3350 503005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Dimensional Reduction of a Lorentz and CPT-violating Maxwell-Chern-Simons Model

    H. Belich, Jr., M. M. Ferreira, Jr., J. A. Helayel-Neto and M. T. D. Orlando, Phys. Rev. D 67, 125011 (2003) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D69, 109903 (2004)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.125011 [arXiv:hep-th/0212330 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.125011 2003

  27. [27]

    Avila, J

    R. Avila, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, C. M. Reyes and M. Schreck, Phys. Rev. D101, no.5, 055011 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.055011 [arXiv:1911.12221 [hep-th]]. – 39 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.055011 2020

  28. [28]

    A. Arth, K. Dolag, A. M. Beck, M. Petkova and H. Lesch, [arXiv:1412.6533 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Rappaz and J

    Y. Rappaz and J. Schober, Astron. Astrophys.683, A35 (2024) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347497 [arXiv:2307.09451 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347497 2024

  30. [30]

    Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809521 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.116002 1998

  31. [31]

    Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point

    P. Horava, Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008 [arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.084008 2009

  32. [32]

    A healthy extension of Horava gravity

    D. Blas, O. Pujolàs and S. Sibiryakov, “Consistent extension of Hořava gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010), 181302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.181302 [arXiv:0909.3525 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.181302 2010

  33. [33]

    A. O. Barvinsky, D. Blas, M. Herrero-Valea, S. M. Sibiryakov and C. F. Steinwachs, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.6, 064022 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064022 [arXiv:1512.02250 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.064022 2016

  34. [34]

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. V. Kurov and S. M. Sibiryakov, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.4, 044009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044009 [arXiv:2110.14688 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.044009 2022

  35. [35]

    R. C. Myers and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 211601 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.211601 [arXiv:hep-ph/0301124 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.211601 2003

  36. [36]

    On calculation of cross sections in Lorentz violating theories

    G. Rubtsov, P. Satunin and S. Sibiryakov, Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 085012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.085012 [arXiv:1204.5782 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.085012 2012

  37. [37]

    One-loop correction to the photon velocity in Lorentz-violating QED

    P. Satunin, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.12, 125016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.125016 [arXiv:1705.07796 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.125016 2018

  38. [38]

    P. R. S. Carvalho and M. I. Sena-Junior, Annals Phys.387(2017), 290-298 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2017.10.016 [arXiv:1803.00069 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2017.10.016 2017

  39. [40]

    Lorentz Violation in Fermion-Antifermion Decays of Spinless Particles

    B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) no.11, 116007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.116007 [arXiv:1403.2751 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.116007 2014

  40. [42]

    CPT Violation and the Standard Model

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, “CPT violation and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 55(1997), 6760-6774 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6760 [arXiv:hep-ph/9703464 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6760 1997

  41. [43]

    One-Loop Renormalization of Lorentz-Violating Electrodynamics

    V. A. Kostelecký, C. D. Lane and A. G. M. Pickering, “One-loop renormalization of Lorentz-violating electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D65(2002), 056006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.056006 [arXiv:hep-th/0111123 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.056006 2002

  42. [45]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 883-885 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.883

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.883 1977

  43. [46]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D16, 1519 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1519 – 40 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1519 1977

  44. [47]

    M. S. Chanowitz and M. K. Gaillard, Nucl. Phys. B261, 379-431 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90580-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90580-2 1985

  45. [48]

    J. A. Oller, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.110, 103728 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103728 [arXiv:1909.00370 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103728 2020

  46. [49]

    With modern Applications (Heidelberg: Springer Briefs in Physics, 2019)

    Oller J AA Brief Introduction to Dispersion Relations. With modern Applications (Heidelberg: Springer Briefs in Physics, 2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [50]

    Non-perturbative methods for a chiral effective field theory of finite density nuclear systems

    A. Lacour, J. A. Oller and U. G. Meissner, Annals Phys.326, 241-306 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.06.012 [arXiv:0906.2349 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.06.012 2011

  48. [51]

    A chiral covariant approach to $\rho\rho$ scattering

    D. Gülmez, U. G. Meißner and J. A. Oller, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.7, 460 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5018-z [arXiv:1611.00168 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5018-z 2017

  49. [52]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 1888-1910 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1888

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.1888 1910

  50. [53]

    S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D65, 116003 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.116003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0111209 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.116003 2002

  51. [54]

    I. Y. Arefeva and I. V. Volovich, [arXiv:hep-th/9412155 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [55]

    Anisotropy beta functions

    V. Periwal, Phys. Rev. D52(1995), 7328-7330 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.7328 [arXiv:hep-th/9508014 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.7328 1995

  53. [56]

    Lorentz Violation and the Yukawa Potential

    B. Altschul, Phys. Lett. B639, 679-683 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.07.021 [arXiv:hep-th/0605044 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.07.021 2006

  54. [57]

    Renormalization of Scalar and Yukawa Field Theories with Lorentz Violation

    A. Ferrero and B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D84, 065030 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.065030 [arXiv:1104.4778 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.065030 2011

  55. [58]

    Lorentz and CPT Violation in Scalar-Mediated Potentials

    B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D87, 045012 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.045012 [arXiv:1211.6614 [hep-th]]. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D89, no.11, 116007 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.116007 [arXiv:1403.2751 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.045012 2013

  56. [59]

    Altschulet al., Phys

    B. Altschulet al., Phys. Rev. D107, 045005 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.045005 [arXiv:2211.11399 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.045005 2023

  57. [60]

    Altschul, L

    B. Altschul, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, S. Karki, A. C. Lehum and A. Yu. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D107, 115002 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.115002 [arXiv:2304.03025 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.115002 2023

  58. [61]

    Gildener and S

    E. Gildener and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D13, 3333 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3333

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.3333 1976

  59. [62]

    D. S. Ageev and Y. A. Ageeva, [arXiv:2512.19670 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  60. [63]

    Grojean, Phys

    C. Grojean, Phys. Usp.50(2007), 1-35 doi:10.1070/PU2007v050n01ABEH006157

    work page doi:10.1070/pu2007v050n01abeh006157 2007

  61. [64]

    Duaso Pueyo, H

    C. Duaso Pueyo, H. Goodhew, C. McCulloch and E. Pajer, JHEP08(2025), 047 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025)047 [arXiv:2410.23709 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)047 2025

  62. [65]

    Eliminating the CPT-Odd f Coefficient from the Lorentz-Violating Standard Model Extension

    B. Altschul, J. Phys. A39, 13757-13766 (2006) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/44/010 [arXiv:hep-th/0602235 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/44/010 2006

  63. [66]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, JHEP10, 014 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014 [arXiv:hep-th/0602178 [hep-th]]. – 41 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014 2006