Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Critical dynamics of three-dimensional $Z_N$ gauge models and the inverted XY universality class

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the purely relaxational critical dynamics of the three-dimensional inverted XY universality class has dynamic exponent z = 2.59(3), obtained from out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling of Z6 and Z8 gauge models.

desk verdict Solid first estimate of the dynamic exponent for the 3D IXY universality class, with an honest treatment of the main caveat; the conjectured out-of-equilibrium scaling ansatz is the only real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08236 v1 pith:KJHQQ4MO submitted 2025-05-13 cond-mat.stat-mech hep-lat

Claudio Bonati , Haralambos Panagopoulos , Ettore Vicari This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat PACS 05.70.Jk64.60.Ht11.15.Ha
keywords dynamiccriticalexponentslowingdowninvertedXYuniversalityclasstopologicalphasetransitionlatticegaugetheoryZ_Nmodelout-of-equilibriumfinite-sizescalingMetropolisdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper determines the dynamic critical exponent that controls critical slowing down under local, purely relaxational Metropolis dynamics at topological transitions in the three-dimensional inverted XY (IXY) universality class. Simulating Z6 and Z8 lattice gauge models quenched instantaneously to their critical points, it analyzes the relaxational flow of the gauge-invariant energy density within an out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling framework and obtains $z = 2.59(3)$. This matters because the IXY class includes the continuous transitions of 3D lattice Abelian Higgs models, effective theories of superconductors, and because it shows that gauge-theory topological transitions slow down far more severely than the standard 3D XY model, whose relaxational exponent is $z \approx 2.02$ despite sharing the same correlation-length exponent $\nu \approx 0.6717$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the subtracted post-quench energy density $E_s(t,r,L) = E(t,r,L) - E_{c,\infty}$ and its rescaled form $\Omega = L^{3-y_r} E_s$, with $y_r = 1/\nu$. The argument runs on the conjectured out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling ansatz $\Omega(t,r,L) \approx A(t L^{-z}, r L^{y_r})$, which removes the analytic background that dominates the equilibrium energy density and lets the time variable $\Theta = t L^{-z}$ expose the dynamic exponent. In practice the paper fits $t(\Omega, \Upsilon, L) \approx L^z F(\Omega, \Upsilon)$ and, more stably, the difference $\Delta(\Omega, \Upsilon_1, \Upsilon_2, L) \approx L^z F_\Delta(\Omega, \Upsilon_1, \Upsilon_2)$ at fixed $\Omega$, while the Polyakov-loop integrated autocorrelation time supplies the equilibrium cross-check.

What would settle it

Run the same local Metropolis quench protocol on the 3D IXY gauge model (or on a 3D Abelian Higgs model) at its critical point and extract $z$ from the out-of-equilibrium scaling of $t(\Omega, \Upsilon, L)$; if the result lies outside $2.59(3)$ — for instance near $2.3$, as the energy-density integrated autocorrelation naively suggests — the claimed universality of the dynamic exponent across the whole IXY class would be disproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the dynamic exponent $z$ of the IXY universality class under Model A (locally reversible Metropolis) dynamics is $z = 2.59(3)$, a value the paper treats as universal for all topological transitions in this class. The evidence comes from consistent out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling analyses of the Z6 and Z8 gauge models, yielding $z = 2.595(35)$ and $z = 2.590(35)$ respectively, with equilibrium autocorrelation data of the Polyakov loop giving the less precise but consistent $z = 2.52(12)$. Because the duality relating the IXY free energy to the XY model is nonlocal, local dynamics in the gauge model maps to nonlocal dynamics in the spin model, so the dynamic universality class differs even though the static thermal sector is shared.

Load-bearing premise

The determination of $z$ assumes that the out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling form of Eq. (15) for the subtracted energy density is exact, a conjecture whose numerical support comes from earlier work; if that form is contaminated by analytic background or corrections stronger than $O(L^{-\omega})$, the quoted exponent inherits a bias.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The value $z = 2.59(3)$ should govern critical slowing down for any local relaxational dynamics at a 3D IXY transition, including the lattice IXY gauge model and the 3D Abelian Higgs models.
  • Relaxational dynamics in the IXY class is significantly slower than in the standard 3D XY class: $z = 2.59(3)$ versus $z \approx 2.02$, despite identical static exponents.
  • The nonlocal duality between the IXY and XY partition functions does not imply equal dynamic exponents, because it does not preserve locality of the dynamics.
  • The integrated autocorrelation time of the energy density grows with an effective exponent near $2.3$, smaller than the true $z$; the Polyakov loop, not the energy density, couples to the slowest critical mode.
  • Equilibrium autocorrelation analyses confirm but do not improve on the out-of-equilibrium estimate, so the quench-based method is the more powerful route to $z$ in gauge systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $z = 2.59(3)$ carries over to Abelian Higgs models, numerical studies of superconducting transitions will need roughly $L^{0.57}$ more sweeps than XY spin-model equivalents to decorrelate at criticality.
  • A direct quench experiment on the 3D IXY gauge model itself, rather than on the dual ZN clock or XY systems, would test the universality claim; agreement at the level of a few percent would close the loop on the class.
  • The observable dependence of integrated autocorrelation exponents ($z_i \approx 2.3$ for energy density versus $z = 2.52(12)$ for Polyakov loops) is a caution that future dynamic studies in gauge theories should report both the observable and the estimator.
  • Applying the same out-of-equilibrium protocol to noncompact U(1) Higgs or other ZN models with $N > 8$ could show whether $z$ stays pinned near $2.59$ or drifts with $N$, sharpening the meaning of 'universal' for this class.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the critical relaxational (Model A) dynamics of three-dimensional Z_N lattice gauge models with N=6 and N=8, whose topological transitions belong to the inverted XY (IXY) universality class. The authors perform large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of a local Metropolis dynamics and analyze out-of-equilibrium relaxational flows after instantaneous quenches to the critical point. Using an out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling framework adapted from Refs. [55,61], they fit the L-dependence of the time at fixed rescaled energy density, and of time differences, to aL^z, obtaining z=2.595(35) for N=6 and z=2.590(35) for N=8. They combine these into a final estimate z=2.59(3). They also report an equilibrium study of integrated autocorrelation times of Polyakov loops, giving a consistent but less precise value z=2.52(12). The central claim is that z=2.59(3) characterizes the relaxational critical slowing down of the entire IXY universality class, including topological transitions in 3D Abelian Higgs models.

Significance. If the result holds, this is the first determination of the Model A dynamic exponent for the IXY universality class, filling a clear gap in the literature. The consistency between N=6 and N=8 provides strong evidence for universality, and the comparison with the standard XY value z≈2.02 highlights a striking difference in dynamics despite shared static exponents. The paper is careful in several ways: fits are tested for stability as L_min is increased, scaling-correction fits with L^{-ω} are included, and an independent equilibrium probe based on Polyakov loops is used as a cross-check. The prediction is falsifiable in other IXY-class models, such as lattice Abelian Higgs theories, making the paper a useful reference for future work.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. III C and Eq. (15); Sec. IV and Eq. (19)] The final estimate z=2.59(3) rests on the conjectured out-of-equilibrium scaling form (15) for the subtracted energy density. The collapse shown in Fig. 2 is not an independent test, since the same energy-density data determine z. The paper itself reports in Sec. IV that the integrated autocorrelation time of the energy density gives z_i≈2.3, smaller than the claimed z, which the authors attribute to weak coupling of the energy density to the slowest modes. If that is the case, the out-of-equilibrium energy flow could similarly measure an effective exponent rather than the slowest-mode exponent. The only independent slowest-mode probe, the Polyakov-loop integrated autocorrelation time, yields z=2.52(12), whose uncertainty is considerably larger than the claimed 0.03. The error quoted in Eq. (19) therefore does not include a possible systematic uncertainty from observable choice. I ask the authors to either provide an out-of-equilibrium analysis of a nonlocal topological observable (e.g., Polyakov-loop related quantities) or to widen the final error to a conservative value and explicitly state this limitation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III D] In the sentence preceding Eq. (19), 'we consider' should be 'we obtain', and the capitalization 'We' after the comma should be lower-case.
  2. [Sec. III A] The acceptance ratio of about 2% at the critical point is quite low; it would be helpful to state the corresponding autocorrelation times or the number of Metropolis sweeps per trajectory to help the reader judge the computational efficiency of the proposed update.
  3. [References] Reference [63] appears to have a formatting error in the author list: 'E. V. Ivanovae. M. V. Kompaniets' should have a space and period, e.g., 'E. V. Ivanova, E. M. V. Kompaniets' or similar.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The text says 'in Figs. 2 and we show plots' in the third paragraph of Sec. III D; the figure number for the second panel is missing and should be 'Figs. 2 and 3' or the sentence should be rewritten.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: z=2.59(3) is a fitted output of the relaxational-flow scaling, not an input; the self-cited FSS ansatz in Eq. (15) does not fix the value of z.

full rationale

The target quantity, z=2.59(3), is not an input to the analysis: it is extracted as the power of L in fits of t(Ω,Υ,L)=L^z F(Ω,Υ) and of the differences Δ(Ω,Υ1,Υ2,L) (Eqs. (17)-(18), Tables I-II), with z a free parameter. The out-of-equilibrium FSS form in Eq. (15), Ω=L^{3−y_r}E_s≈A(Θ,Υ) with Θ=tL^{−z}, is described as "conjectured, and numerical verified, in Refs. [55,61]", a self-citation to the authors' prior work; however that ansatz does not specify the value of z, and the present data determine it from the scaling of relaxation times with L. The collapse shown in Fig. 2 uses the fitted z, so it is a consistency check rather than an independent test of the ansatz, but the paper does not misrepresent it as an independent prediction. The internal comparison between N=6 and N=8, and the equilibrium Polyakov-loop integrated autocorrelation z=2.52(12), provide additional support not forced by the out-of-equilibrium fits. The acknowledged discrepancy in Sec. IV (energy-density integrated autocorrelation gives z_i≈2.3) is a fragility or correctness concern about whether the energy density couples to the slowest modes, not a circularity. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only mild issue is the reliance on a self-developed scaling hypothesis, which is transparently cited and not equivalent to the result; this is a minor self-citation, not load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The result is a numerical measurement, not a derivation. The most significant burden is the conjectured out-of-equilibrium scaling form from the authors' own earlier work; static exponents, critical couplings, and the IXY classification are imported from the literature. No new entities are introduced, and the listed free parameters are conventional fit amplitudes that do not affect the exponent estimate.

free parameters (2)
  • a = not reported
    Non-universal amplitude in the power-law fits Delta(Omega, Upsilon1, Upsilon2, L) approximately aL^z and t(Omega, Upsilon, L) approximately aL^z (Tables I-II); fitted for each Omega and Upsilon, does not affect the exponent estimate.
  • a1 = not reported
    Amplitude of the leading O(L^{-omega}) correction in fits to aL^z(1+a1 L^{-omega}), used to assess systematic error in z.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Out-of-equilibrium FSS ansatz, Eq. (15): Omega = L^{3-y_r} Es is approximately A(Theta, Upsilon) with Theta = t L^{-z}
    Conjectured and numerically verified in Refs. [55,61] (same authors); the entire z determination relies on this scaling form.
  • domain assumption Z6 and Z8 gauge models belong to the IXY universality class with nu = 0.6717(1) and omega = 0.789(4)
    Taken from duality and Refs. [8,23-25,65]; used to set Upsilon = r L^{1/nu} and expected scaling corrections.
  • domain assumption Universality of z within the IXY class
    Stated as a conjecture in Sec. V; supported by consistency of Z6 and Z8 results but not proven for all IXY systems (e.g., Abelian Higgs models).
  • domain assumption Local Metropolis dynamics realizes the same dynamic universality class as the Langevin Model A dynamics
    Standard critical-dynamics assumption; local reversible updates are expected to share the same dynamic exponent z.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical dynamics of three-dimensional $Z_N$ gauge models and the inverted XY universality class." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KJHQQ4MO

@misc{pith2026250508236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical dynamics of three-dimensional $Z_N$ gauge models and the inverted XY universality class},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KJHQQ4MO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08236}
}
abstract

We investigate the critical relaxational dynamics of the three-dimensional (3D) lattice $Z_N$ gauge models with $N=6$ and $N=8$, whose equilibrium critical behavior at their topological transitions belongs to the inverted XY (IXY) universality class (this is also the universality class of the continuous transitions of the 3D lattice U(1) gauge Higgs models with a one-component complex scalar field), which is connected to the standard XY universality class by a nonlocal duality relation of the partition functions. Specifically, we consider the purely relaxational dynamics realized by a locally reversible Metropolis dynamics, as commonly used in Monte Carlo simulations. To determine the corresponding dynamic exponent $z$, we focus on the out-of-equilibrium critical relaxational flows arising from instantaneous quenches to the critical point, which are analyzed within an out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling framework. We obtain the estimate $z=2.59(3)$. A numerical analysis of the equilibrium critical dynamics give consistent, but less accurate, results. This dynamic exponent is expected to characterize the critical slowing down of the purely relaxational dynamics of all topological transitions that belong to the 3D IXY universality class. We note that this result implies that the critical relaxational dynamics of the 3D IXY universality class is slower than that of the standard 3D XY universality class, whose relaxational dynamic exponent $z\approx 2.02$ is significantly smaller, although they share the same length-scale critical exponent $\nu\approx 0.6717$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08236 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: We show a log-log plot of some data of the difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Out-of-equilibrium FSS along the relaxational flow of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Integrated autocorrelation time of the Polyakov loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Volume I. Foundations, (Cambridge University Press, 2005); The Quantum Theory of Fields. Volume II. Modern Applica- tions, (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Clarendon Press, 2002)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Clarendon Press, 2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics, (The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Com- pany, Menlo Park, California, 1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems: from the origin of sound to an origin of light and elec- trons, (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems: from the origin of sound to an origin of light and elec- trons, (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Fradkin, Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin, Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Sachdev, Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction, Rep

    S. Sachdev, Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 014001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phases of Matter , Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2023

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phases of Matter , Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Three- dimensional Abelian and non-Abelian gauge Higgs theo- ries, arXiv:2410.05823

    arXiv

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, Jour. of Math. Phys. 12, 2259 (1971)

    1971

  2. [10]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  4. [12]

    Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev

    R. Savit, Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 453 (1980). 10

    1980

  5. [13]

    Dasgupta and B

    C. Dasgupta and B. I. Halperin, Phase Transitions in a Lattice Model of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett 47, 1556 (1981)

    1981

  6. [14]

    Neuhaus, A

    T. Neuhaus, A. Rajantie, and K. Rummukainen, Numer- ical study of duality and universality in a frozen super- conductor, Phys. Rev. B 67, 014525 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    Belitz, T

    D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and T. Vojta, Local ver- sus nonlocal order-parameter field theories for quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 65, 165112 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Z. Bi, E. Lake, and T. Senthil, Landau ordering phase transitions beyond the Landau paradigm, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023031 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Deconfinement transitions in three-dimensional compact lattice Abelian Higgs models with multiple-charge scalar fields, Phys. Rev. E 109, 044146 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Diverse univer- sality classes of the topological deconfinement transitions of three-dimensional noncompact lattice Abelian-Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034517 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group and critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys 55, 583 (1983)

    1983

  12. [20]

    M. E. Fisher, The renormalization group in the theory of critical behavior, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 543 (1975)

    1975

  13. [21]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory, Phys. Rep. 368, 549 (2002)

    2002

  14. [22]

    Rossini and E

    D. Rossini and E. Vicari, Coherent and dissipative dy- namics at quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rep. 936, 1 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Theoretical estimates of the critical exponents of the superfluid transition in 4He by lattice methods, Phys. Rev. B 74, 144506 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensions, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 224517 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 142 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Lattice Abelian- Higgs model with noncompact gauge fields, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085104 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    B. I. Halperin, T. C. Lubensky, and S. K. Ma, First-Order Phase Transitions in Superconductors and Smectic-A Liquid Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 292 (1974)

    1974

  20. [28]

    Herbut and Z

    F. Herbut and Z. Tesanovic, Critical Fluctuations in Superconductors and the Magnetic Field Penetration Depth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4588 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    Folk and Y

    R. Folk and Y. Holovatch, On the critical fluctuations in superconductors, J. Phys. A 29, 3409 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    Bergerhoff, F

    B. Bergerhoff, F. Freire, D.F. Litim, S. Lola, and C. Wet- terich, Phase diagram of superconductors from nonper- turbative flow equations, Phys. Rev. B 53, 5734 (1996)

    1996

  23. [31]

    Olsson and S

    P. Olsson and S. Teitel, Critical Behavior of the Meissner Transition in the Lattice London Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1964 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    Hove and A

    J. Hove and A. Sudbo, Anomalous Scaling Dimensions and Stable Charged Fixed Point of Type-II Supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3426 (2000)

    2000

  25. [33]

    Kleinert, F

    H. Kleinert, F. S. Nogueira, and A. Sudbø, Deconfine- ment Transition in Three-Dimensional Compact U(1) Gauge Theories Coupled to Matter Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 232001 (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    S. Mo, J. Hove, and A. Sudbø, Order of the metal- to-superconductor transition, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104501 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    I. Herbut, A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Coulomb-Higgs phase transition of three-dimensional lattice Abelian Higgs gauge models with noncompact gauge variables and gauge fixing, Phys. Rev. E 108, 044125 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  30. [38]

    Ma, Modern theory of critical phenomena , Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)

    S.-k. Ma, Modern theory of critical phenomena , Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)

    2001

  31. [39]

    Folk and G

    R. Folk and G. Moser, Critical dynamics: A field- theoretical approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, R207 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    Parisi and Y.-S

    G. Parisi and Y.-S. Wu, Perturbation theory without gauge fixing, Sci. Sin. 24, 483 (1981)

    1981

  33. [41]

    Zwanziger, Covariant quantization of gauge fields without Gribov ambiguity, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Covariant quantization of gauge fields without Gribov ambiguity, Nucl. Phys. B 192, 259 (1981)

    1981

  34. [42]

    Floratos and J

    E. Floratos and J. Iliopoulos, Equivalence of stochastic and canonical quantization in perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 214, 392 (1982)

    1982

  35. [43]

    Nakazato, M

    H. Nakazato, M. Namiki, I. Ohba, and K. Okano, Equiv- alence of stochastic quantization method to conventional field theories through super transformation invariance, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 298 (1983)

    1983

  36. [44]

    Zinn-Justin, Renormalization and stochastic quantiza- tion, Nucl

    J. Zinn-Justin, Renormalization and stochastic quantiza- tion, Nucl. Phys. B 275, 135 (1986)

    1986

  37. [45]

    Zinn-Justin and D

    J. Zinn-Justin and D. Zwanziger, Ward identities for the stochastic quantization of gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B 295, 297 (1988)

    1988

  38. [46]

    Dudka, R

    M. Dudka, R. Folk, and G. Moser, Gauge dependence of the critical dynamics at the superconducting phase transition, Cond. Matter Phys. 10, 189 (2007)

    2007

  39. [47]

    Lennert, S

    C. Lennert, S. Vishveshwara, and M. P. A. Fisher, Criti- cal Dynamics of Superconductors in the Charged Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 097004 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    G. J. Stephens, L. M. A. Bettencourt, and W. H. Zurek, Critical Dynamics of Gauge Systems: Spontaneous Vor- tex Formation in 2D Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137004 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    V. Aji, N. Goldenfeld, Critical Dynamics of a Vortex- Loop Model for the Superconducting Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197003 (2001)

    2001

  42. [50]

    L. M. Jensen, B. J. Kim, and P. Minnhagen, Dynamic critical exponent of two-, three-, and four-dimensional XY models with relaxational and resistively shunted junction dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15412 (2000)

    2000

  43. [51]

    Lidmar, M

    J. Lidmar, M. Wallin, C. Wengel, S. M. Girvin, and A. P. Young, Dynamical universality classes of the supercon- ducting phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 58, 1827 (1998)

    1998

  44. [52]

    Weber and H

    H. Weber and H. J. Jensen, Monte Carlo Calculation of the Linear Resistance of a Three Dimensional Lattice superconductor Model in the London Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2620 (1997)

    1997

  45. [53]

    F. Liu, M. Mondello, and N. Goldenfeld, Kinetics of the Superconducting Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3071 (1991)

    1991

  46. [54]

    Rajagopal and F

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Static and dynamic criti- cal phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 399, 395 (1993). 11

    1993

  47. [55]

    Bonati, H

    C. Bonati, H. Panagopoulos, and E. Vicari, Out-of- equilibrium critical dynamics of the three-dimensional Z2 gauge model along critical relaxational flows, Phys. Rev. E 111, 054107 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Critical relax- ational dynamics at the continuous transitions of three- dimensional spin models with Z2 gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115129 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    N. Xu, C. Castelnovo, R. G. Melko, C. Chamon, and A. W. Sandvik, Dynamic scaling of topological ordering in classical systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 024432 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Ben-Av, D

    R. Ben-Av, D. Kandel, E. Katznelson, P. G. Lauwers, and S. Solomon, Critical acceleration of lattice gauge sim- ulations. Journal of Stat. Phys. 58, 125 (1990)

    1990

  51. [59]

    Hasenbusch, The dynamic critical exponent z of the three-dimensional Ising universality class: Monte Carlo simulations of the improved Blume-Capel model, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, The dynamic critical exponent z of the three-dimensional Ising universality class: Monte Carlo simulations of the improved Blume-Capel model, Phys. Rev. E 101, 022126 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Binder, Monte Carlo investigations of phase tran- sitions and critical phenomena

    K. Binder, Monte Carlo investigations of phase tran- sitions and critical phenomena. Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Domb, C. & Green, M. S. (eds.) vol. 5b, 1 (Academic Press, London, 1976)

    1976

  53. [61]

    Panagopoulos and E

    H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari, Out-of-equilibrium scal- ing of the energy density along the critical relaxational flow after a quench of the temperature, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064107 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    L. Ts. Adzhemyan, D. A. Evdokimova, M. Hnatic, E. V. Ivanovae. M. V. Kompaniets, A. Kudlisf, and D. V. Za- kharov, Model A of critical dynamics: 5-loop ϵ-expansion study, Physica A 600, 127530 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    N. V. Antonov and A. N. Vasilev, Critical dynamics as a field theory, Theor. Math. Phys. 60, 671 (1984)

    1984

  56. [64]

    P. C. Hohenberg, B. I. Halperin, and S.-K. Ma, Calcu- lation of Dynamic Critical Properties using Wilson’s Ex- pansion Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1548 (1972)

    1972

  57. [65]

    Borisenko, V

    O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, G. Cortese, M. Gravina, A. Papa, and I. Surzhikov, Critical behavior of 3D Z(N) lattice gauge theories at zero temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 879, 80 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    C. P. Korthals Altes, Duality for Z(N) Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 142, 315 (1978)

    1978

  59. [67]

    Pelissetto, D

    A. Pelissetto, D. Rossini, and E. Vicari, Dynamic finite- size scaling after a quench at quantum transitions, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052148 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Whitmer, Over-relaxation methods for Monte Carlo simulations of quadratic and multiquadratic actions, Phys

    C. Whitmer, Over-relaxation methods for Monte Carlo simulations of quadratic and multiquadratic actions, Phys. Rev. D 29, 306 (1984)

    1984

  61. [69]

    S. A. Gottlieb, P. B. MacKenzie, H.B. Thacker, and D. Weingarten, Hadronic Couplings Constants in Lattice Gauge Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 263, 704 (1986)

    1986

  62. [70]

    Flyvbjerg and H

    H. Flyvbjerg and H. G. Petersen, Error estimates on av- erages of correlated data, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 461 (1989)

    1989

  63. [71]

    Wolff, Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Comput

    U. Wolff, Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156, 143 (2004)

    2004

  64. [72]

    Del Debbio, G

    L. Del Debbio, G. Manca, E. Vicari, Critical slowing down of topological modes, Phys. Lett. B 594, 315 (2004)

    2004

  65. [73]

    A. D. Sokal, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Me- chanics: Foundations and New Algorithms, in Functional Integration. Basics and applications , (Eds.) C. DeWitt- Morette, P. Cartier, and A. Folacci, Springer (1997)

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.