Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Modeling Unseen Environments with Language-guided Composable Causal Components in Reinforcement Learning

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A world model can identify language-controlled causal blocks in its latent state and recombine them to handle tasks never seen in training, with a uniqueness guarantee for the blocks and their dynamics.

desk verdict A real but fragile step forward: the block-wise identifiability theorem extends prior work to multiple language components, yet its proof silently assumes a language-invariant mixing function that the implemented model violates. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08361 v1 pith:OY6IPXJI submitted 2025-05-13 cs.AI

Xinyue Wang , Biwei Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords compositionalgeneralizationcausalrepresentationlearningworldmodelreinforcementidentifiabilitylanguage-guideddecompositionmaskedautoencodersparsedynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a reinforcement-learning agent can model its world as a set of language-controlled causal blocks, and that those blocks can be recombined to act in environments never seen during training. The claim is that, under mild assumptions, the blocks and their transition dynamics are uniquely identifiable, so generalization becomes a matter of composing already-learned pieces rather than retraining. If true, this would make model-based agents dramatically more sample-efficient when tasks share verbs, objects, or other modular components. The paper's experiments on synthetic latents and robotic manipulation tasks report that the method outperforms prior world models and representation-learning baselines on component identification, policy learning, and adaptation to unseen task combinations.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the block-wise identifiability theorem for language-controlled latent components. It uses differences of first-order log-density derivatives across values of a language token; when a matrix of those differences is invertible, cross-component Jacobian blocks vanish, meaning each true component is recoverable from its estimated counterpart up to an invertible transformation. The implementation realizes the theorem through a factorized transition model conditioned on token embeddings, mutual-information estimators that maximize the association between each latent block and its token while minimizing associations with other tokens, and gated masks with adaptive L1 sparsity that make both decoding and reward prediction use only a sparse subset of the latent state.

What would settle it

Train the same model on a synthetic system that obeys all other assumptions but gives two latent dimensions in one language-controlled component correlated transition noise; if the $R^2$ confusion matrix between estimated and true latent blocks stops being block-diagonal, the identifiability proof hinges on the conditional-independence assumption rather than on the language signals alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that composable causal components—minimal subsets of latent dimensions each directly controlled by a language token—and their dynamics can be uniquely identified, and that a world model built from them generalizes to unseen tasks by recombination. The authors prove block-wise identifiability: with enough distinct values of a language component, each true component is an invertible function of the estimated component, so the latent space separates into blocks aligned with language tokens. They implement this identification in a masked-autoencoder world model with per-component transition models, mutual-information constraints that tie each block to its token and separate it from others, and learnable sparse masks on decoding. In experiments, the model identifies latent components with high $R^2$ values, predicts latent rollouts in unseen combinations, and adapts faster than full-model fine-tuning on robotic manipulation tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, once the language labels, previous state, and previous action are known, every hidden dimension changes independently of every other hidden dimension; if real systems couple these changes, the identification guarantee may not carry over.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A world model trained this way can roll out latent states in unseen combinations of known language components without seeing observations, and the authors report high average $R^2$ over multiple rollout steps.
  • Adapting to a new recombination requires updating only the dynamics-related modules—representation model, transition model, task encoder, and decoding masks—not the entire world model, which lowers the adaptation cost.
  • The learned blocks are interpretable: intervening on the verb block changes the robot's end effector in reconstructed images, while intervening on the object block changes the object's appearance.
  • The identifiability result requires only $n_{c_i}+1$ values of a language component per component, a weaker demand than earlier single-auxiliary-variable identification schemes.
  • On 18 training tasks and 9 unseen tasks in robotic manipulation, the method improves both training success rate and adaptation success rate relative to the world-model and multi-task baselines compared.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conditional-independence assumption in the proof fails—for example, when gripper and object positions share correlated transition noise—the block-diagonal structure of the recovered components may blur, so the guarantee likely requires the independence to hold in the target system, not only in the synthetic generator.
  • Because the identifiability theorem relies on multiple intermittent control signals rather than on language specifically, the same block-wise decomposition could be applied to other compositional modalities, such as decomposing audio into frequency bands or visual scenes into objects.
  • The sparse-mask and mutual-information modules may transfer to world models that do not use language at all, acting as a general prior for modular dynamics; the ablation study suggests these components improve sample efficiency, but no language-free test is reported.
  • A practical bottleneck is the need for a small fixed set of language-token values; long or ambiguous instructions would violate the assumption, and preprocessing them into structured tokens is a natural extension the paper does not test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes WM3C, a model-based reinforcement learning framework that uses language descriptions to decompose the latent state into composable, language-controlled causal components, learns their transition dynamics, and recombines them for fast generalization to unseen tasks. The core theoretical claim is a block-wise identifiability theorem (Theorem 1) stating that, under assumptions on the latent dynamics and a rank condition, each language-controlled component can be uniquely recovered up to an invertible transformation. The method is instantiated on top of a DreamerV3-style world model with a task-conditioned decoder, mutual information constraints, and sparsity masks, and is evaluated on a synthetic identification benchmark and on Meta-World robotic manipulation tasks. The paper reports state-of-the-art performance in latent component identification, training efficiency, adaptation to unseen tasks, and interpretability of the learned components through intervention experiments.

Significance. If the identifiability guarantee and the implementation were properly matched, the paper would make a valuable contribution to causal representation learning and RL generalization: it targets multiple simultaneous auxiliary variables controlling separate latent blocks, gives a block-wise identifiability result, and demonstrates practically appealing results on Meta-World with a sample-efficient world model. The paper includes a self-contained proof sketch, three-seed experiments, an ablation study, and a candid appendix discussing some limitations. However, the central theoretical guarantee does not cover the actual implemented model as written, because the proof relies on unstated assumptions about the estimated mixing function and latent density factorization, and the implemented decoder is task-conditioned in a way that violates the needed language-invariance. The significance of the empirical claims is therefore not yet fully established; the theoretical and empirical narratives need to be reconciled before the paper can be accepted in a journal.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A.3, Eqs. (16)-(17)] The step from Eq. (16) to Eq. (17) subtracts the equations for l_{1,k} and l_{1,0} and silently drops the difference of the term ∂ log|det J_h^{-1}|/∂\hat s_{j,t}. This cancellation is valid only if the transformation h = g^{-1}∘\hat g, or at least the determinant of its Jacobian, is independent of the language component l_1. This property is not stated in Theorem 1, and the implemented model violates it: Eq. (3) conditions the observation decoder on a learnable task embedding z = f_α(u), and in Meta-World u encodes the verb-object task, so z, and hence \hat g and h, vary with l_1 and l_2. Consequently Eq. (17) does not follow and the homogeneous linear system in Eq. (19) is not derived for the implemented model. The theorem as stated therefore does not provide the advertised guarantee for WM3C. Please add the missing language-invariance assumption explicitly and either modify the architecture so the decoder is shared across tasks or prove a weaker statement that explicitly allows h to depend on language and clarifies what form of block-wise identifiability remains.
  2. [Appendix A.3, Eqs. (13)-(15), (17)-(18)] The proof also assumes properties of the estimated model that are not stated in Theorem 1: that the estimated latent density factorizes as ∏_j p(\hat s_{j,t} | l_j, ...) and that the score of the estimated components outside c_1, namely \hat q_j(\hat s_{j,t}, l_{1,k}, l_2), does not change when l_1 changes. The first property is used to write Eq. (14), and the second is needed for the right-hand side of Eq. (17) to vanish. These properties are partially enforced by the factorized representation and transition models in Eq. (4) of the implementation, but they are not assumptions of the theorem. An identifiability proof must either restrict the class of estimated models or add these as explicit assumptions; otherwise a general estimated model matching the observed distribution need not satisfy Eq. (17), and the conclusion of Theorem 1 is unsupported.
  3. [Theorem 1, Assumption 4] Assumption 4 requires every pair of latent dimensions to be conditionally independent given the language components, previous state, and previous action. This assumption is load-bearing for the proof because it is used in Eqs. (13)-(15) to decompose the joint log-density into a sum over dimensions. It is a strong assumption for physical systems, where transition noise is often correlated across state dimensions such as object and end-effector positions. The synthetic experiments satisfy it by construction (Section A.5.1), and the Meta-World experiments do not test it. Section 3.2.2 itself concedes that 'not all identifiability conditions can be easily met in practical applications.' The paper should present Theorem 1 explicitly as a sufficient-condition result with this limitation stated, or provide a sensitivity analysis showing that mild violations of Assumption 4 do not destroy block-wise identification.
  4. [Table 1] The training split in Table 1 lists both 'Push-Back' and 'Push' with the same language components (Push, Puck). If those two tasks share the same verb-object annotation, the language components do not uniquely determine the task dynamics, which contradicts the assumed generative process of Eq. (2) in which each component c_{i,t} is controlled by its language component l_i. This would compromise the Meta-World experiments as a clean instantiation of the compositional assumption. Please clarify the exact language annotations for these tasks, or adjust the training/test split so that distinct tasks with identical annotations are not conflated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.2 and Appendix A.3, Eq. (19)] The notation for the number of language values in Assumption 5 is inconsistent with the proof: the assumption states 'n_{c_i}+1 values of l_i', while the proof says 'n_{c_1} values in l_1, from l_{1,0} to l_{1,k}', and the displayed matrix in the main text contains broken subscripts and a stray 'n_{c_i}_t'. Please rewrite the rank condition with consistent and readable indexing.
  2. [Appendix A.3, 'All in one' task count] The number of tasks required for the 'all-in-one' identification strategy is stated as ∏ n_{c_i} for two components and ∏ n_{c_i}+1 for m components; this should be ∏_{i=1}^m (n_{c_i}+1), since each language component needs n_{c_i}+1 values. As written, the count is inconsistent with the one-by-one strategy and with the statement of Assumption 5.
  3. [Section 3.1, Figure 3] The off-diagonal R^2 values in the confusion matrix are around 0.1-0.12, which is not obviously negligible. Please report whether these values are statistically distinguishable from zero and discuss the tolerance of block-wise identifiability to such off-diagonal leakage.
  4. [Section 3.2.1, Figure 4] The text claims 'significantly better data efficiency and performance' over baselines, but no significance tests are reported; with only three seeds, please provide standard errors, confidence intervals, or a statistical comparison to support the word 'significantly'.
  5. [Section 3.2.2 and Appendix A.7.3] The intervention experiments are not described in enough detail for reproduction: the paper does not specify which latent index is intervened on, what value is used, or how the reconstruction is generated in Figure 6 and the appendix figures. Please document the intervention procedure.
  6. [Appendix A.6.3] The limitations paragraph acknowledges difficulties with overlapping causal components and complex language instructions, but it does not acknowledge the mismatch between Theorem 1's assumptions and the implemented task-conditioned decoder, nor the strength of Assumption 4. Please add an explicit limitation statement covering these theory-implementation gaps.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One mild definitional circularity in Proposition 1; the main identifiability proof and experiments are otherwise self-contained, with a separate non-circular theorem-application gap in the appendix.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.1, Proposition 1, and Appendix A.2 proof]
    "Under the assumption that the graphical representation of the environment model is Markov and faithful to the data, c_{i,t} is a minimal subset of state dimensions that are directly controlled by the language component l_i and s_{j,t}∈c_{i,t} if and only if s_{j,t}⊥⊥l_i|a_{t-1:t},s_{t-1}, and s_{j,t}⊥⊥{l_k}_{k≠i}|l_i,a_{t-1:t},s_{t-1}."

    The proposition's definiendum is already the notion of a component 'directly controlled by l_i'; under the maintained Markov+faithfulness assumptions, conditional dependence given the past is exactly the graphical notion of there being a path from l_i to s_{j,t}, and conditional independence from the other l_k is the graphical notion of no such path. Thus the stated criterion is a definitional unpacking of 'language-controlled component' rather than a substantive identification result. The Appendix A.2 proof confirms this by equating 'not independent given conditioning' with 'there is a directed path from l_i to s_j,t', which is precisely the control relation used to define c_i in the first place.

full rationale

Aside from the definitional character of Proposition 1, the paper's central derivation is not circular. Theorem 1 is a self-contained mathematical identifiability argument with explicit assumptions (invertible smooth mixing, smooth conditional densities, conditional independence of latent dimensions, and an n_ci+1 variability condition); it does not fit the block-wise identifiability conclusion into the model. The synthetic experiments generate data from the assumed model family and then measure recovery of known ground-truth latents, which is a validation of the implementation rather than an importation of the theorem's conclusion. The Meta-World experiments use externally chosen verb/object task decompositions and evaluate task success, not the latent identification claim itself. Self-citations to Liu et al. (2023) and Sun et al. (2024) only acknowledge proof techniques and are not load-bearing. One caveat, which is a soundness concern rather than a circularity: in Appendix A.3 the step from Eq. (16) to Eq. (17) cancels the derivative of log|det J_h^{-1}| without stating a language-invariance condition on h, and the implemented task-conditional decoder (Eq. 3, z=f_alpha(u)) may violate such a condition; this is a theorem-application gap, not an input-output equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The theoretical claim rests on the assumed generative process (Equations 1-2) and Assumptions 1-5 of Theorem 1, together with standard results in nonlinear ICA. The practical method adds hand-chosen loss weights, sparsity thresholds, and MI schedules that affect empirical performance but not the theorem. No new physical entities are introduced; the language-controlled components are a latent structural assumption aligned to language labels.

free parameters (3)
  • Loss weights alpha, lambda, beta, gamma
    Weights in the total objective l_total = alpha*l_rep + lambda*l_trans + beta*l_mi + gamma*l_spar (Eq. 6); set by hand, not tuned or reported, and they determine the balance between reconstruction, dynamics, mutual information, and sparsity.
  • Sparsity rate threshold = 0.25 training, 0.35 adaptation
    Controls the adaptive L1 sparsity loss (Eq. 22-23) and decoding masks; listed in Table 2 as a hyperparameter.
  • Mutual information coefficient schedule bounds (v_start, v_end) = not reported
    The cosine annealing schedule for the MI coefficient (Eq. 21) is defined with v_start and v_end, but their values are not included in the hyperparameter tables.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Data generation process follows Equations 1-2: the latent state is partitioned into m components c_i,t, each sampled from a distribution conditioned only on its language component l_i, previous state, and previous action.
    This is the core structural model; the existence and partition of language-controlled components is assumed, and in Meta-World the partition is imposed by the task annotations rather than discovered.
  • domain assumption The observation function g is invertible and smooth (Assumption 1 of Theorem 1).
    Needed for the change-of-variables argument in Appendix A.3; image observations only approximate invertibility through the autoencoder.
  • domain assumption Latent dimensions are conditionally independent given l_i, s_{t-1}, a_{t-1} (Assumption 4 of Theorem 1).
    Used to factor the log-density in Equation 13; strong for real dynamics with correlated transition noise.
  • ad hoc to paper Rank condition: n_ci+1 values of l_i exist such that the derivative-difference matrix is invertible (Assumption 5 of Theorem 1).
    Generic variability condition required for the proof's linear system argument; plausible but not verified in experiments.
  • domain assumption The environment model is Markov and faithful to the data (Proposition 1).
    Standard causal discovery assumptions that define the language-controlled components via conditional independence.
  • standard math Noise elimination result from Khemakhem et al. (2020) is used to discard the noise term after change of variables.
    The proof in Appendix A.3 relies on this prior result to remove epsilon from the observation model.
invented entities (1)
  • Language-controlled composable latent components c_i
    purpose: Partition the latent state into blocks each directly controlled by one language token, enabling compositional generalization by recombining blocks.
    The existence of these components and their alignment with language is postulated; they have no falsifiable handle outside the model's own reconstructions and success rates, and the Meta-World partition is set by the choice of verbs and objects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling Unseen Environments with Language-guided Composable Causal Components in Reinforcement Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OY6IPXJI

@misc{pith2026250508361,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling Unseen Environments with Language-guided Composable Causal Components in Reinforcement Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OY6IPXJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08361}
}
read the original abstract

Generalization in reinforcement learning (RL) remains a significant challenge, especially when agents encounter novel environments with unseen dynamics. Drawing inspiration from human compositional reasoning -- where known components are reconfigured to handle new situations -- we introduce World Modeling with Compositional Causal Components (WM3C). This novel framework enhances RL generalization by learning and leveraging compositional causal components. Unlike previous approaches focusing on invariant representation learning or meta-learning, WM3C identifies and utilizes causal dynamics among composable elements, facilitating robust adaptation to new tasks. Our approach integrates language as a compositional modality to decompose the latent space into meaningful components and provides theoretical guarantees for their unique identification under mild assumptions. Our practical implementation uses a masked autoencoder with mutual information constraints and adaptive sparsity regularization to capture high-level semantic information and effectively disentangle transition dynamics. Experiments on numerical simulations and real-world robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate that WM3C significantly outperforms existing methods in identifying latent processes, improving policy learning, and generalizing to unseen tasks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08361 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustrations of environment models by abstracting composable concepts from known tasks and reusing them in new contexts through compositional generalization. In this process, language often plays a key role, naturally encapsu￾lating the causal relationships and compositional structures of the environment (Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988). For example, from tasks like pick-place ball and pull puck, we abstract the concepts o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrations of environment models. Our world model identifies composable components and learns composition rules through agent in￾teractions. The learning procedure is grounded on the identifiability results and incorporates natural properties of causal systems to improve learning and generalization. Notably, our learning frame￾work is agnostic. To create a more efficient prototype, we utilize the state-of-the-art… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Language-controlled composable components identification results on known tasks and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Learning curves on Meta-world: Average success rate and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Adaptation curves on 9 unseen tasks, including 7 tasks that are recombination of known [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Intervention on the language-controlled components. The first row is the original image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Training success rates on Meta-world: success rates curve of all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ablation study on two scales of training data: 5 tasks in 1M steps training and 18 tasks in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Individual tasks plot in 5 tasks and 1M steps training. A.7.3 INTERVENTION EFFECT ON THE LANGUAGE-CONTROLLED COMPONENTS Here we present more examples of the effect of intervention on the language-controlled components at different tasks. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Individual tasks plot in 18 tasks and 2M steps training. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Intervention effect on the object component. The first row is the image observation WM3C receives, and the second row is the observation reconstruction from the latent whose object component has been intervened. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Intervention effect on the verb component. The first row is the image observation WM3C receives, and the second row is the observation reconstruction from the latent whose verb component has been intervened. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Task-Sufficient World Models by Synergizing Agentic Exploration and Structured Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Closed-loop agentic probing plus minimality/sufficiency masking recovers compact task-sufficient world-model latents that improve sample-efficient policy learning and cross-task generalization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The latent variabless t have6dimensions, wheren c1 =n c2 =n c3 =

    While our framework is suitable for any number of language-controlled 20 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 components, we use three language components{l 1,l 2,l 3}for simplicity. The latent variabless t have6dimensions, wheren c1 =n c2 =n c3 =

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    However, this also adds some constraints and requirements on the number of tasks that combinedl 1 andl 2, which we are going to discuss later

    ∂ˆsj,t (17) Recall that the independent assumpation that the latent component controlled byl 2 are not con- trolled byl 1.ˆqj(ˆsj,t,l 1,k,l 2)does not change when onlyl 1 changes. However, this also adds some constraints and requirements on the number of tasks that combinedl 1 andl 2, which we are going to discuss later. Here we can remove thel 2 from the...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Abbeel, and Sergey Levine

    Tuomas Haarnoja, Aurick Zhou, P. Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maxi- mum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor.ArXiv, abs/1801.01290,

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi

    URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:28202810. Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603,

    arXiv 1912

  5. [5]

    Mastering diverse domains through world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104,

    Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, and Timothy Lillicrap. Mastering diverse domains through world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104,

    arXiv

  6. [9]

    David Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, and Dylan Paiton

    URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211011033. David Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, and Dylan Paiton. Towards nonlinear disentanglement in natural data with temporal sparse coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.10930,

    arXiv 2007

  7. [10]

    Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 2010–2032, 2023a

    Lingjing Kong, Biwei Huang, Feng Xie, Eric Xing, Yuejie Chi, and Kun Zhang. Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 2010–2032, 2023a. Lingjing Kong, Martin Q Ma, Guangyi Chen, Eric P Xing, Yuejie Chi, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Kun Zhang. Understanding masked autoencoders via hierarchi...

    work page 2010

  8. [13]

    R3m: A univer- sal visual representation for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12601,

    Suraj Nair, Aravind Rajeswaran, Vikash Kumar, Chelsea Finn, and Abhinav Gupta. R3m: A univer- sal visual representation for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12601,

    arXiv

Show all 36 references
  1. [17]

    Skill-based model-based reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07560,

    Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, Joseph J Lim, and Youngwoon Lee. Skill-based model-based reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07560,

    arXiv

  2. [18]

    Temporally disentangled representation learning under unknown nonstationarity.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36,

    13 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Xiangchen Song, Weiran Yao, Yewen Fan, Xinshuai Dong, Guangyi Chen, Juan Carlos Niebles, Eric Xing, and Kun Zhang. Temporally disentangled representation learning under unknown nonstationarity.Advances in Neural Information Proce...

    2025

  3. [19]

    Observational overfitting in reinforcement learning.ArXiv, abs/1912.02975,

    Xingyou Song, Yiding Jiang, Stephen Tu, Yilun Du, and Behnam Neyshabur. Observational overfitting in reinforcement learning.ArXiv, abs/1912.02975,

    1912 arXiv

  4. [20]

    Learning temporally causal latent processes from general temporal data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05428,

    Weiran Yao, Yuewen Sun, Alex Ho, Changyin Sun, and Kun Zhang. Learning temporally causal latent processes from general temporal data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05428,

    arXiv

  5. [21]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1910. 10897. Zhecheng Yuan, Zhengrong Xue, Bo Yuan, Xueqian Wang, Yi Wu, Yang Gao, and Huazhe Xu. Pre-trained image encoder for generalizable visual reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:13022–13037,

    1910

  6. [25]

    improved adaptability by learning task-agnostic policies that can be efficiently reused across multiple domains. In addition, Model-based approaches, particularly world models (Ha & Schmidhuber, 2018; Hafner et al., 2023; Hansen et al., 2023), have also demonstrated success in...

    2018

  7. [27]

    However, these approaches often focus on dimension-wise identifiability, which can be difficult to scale in real-world applications with complex causal dynamics

    have sought to identify causal relationships in latent variables using priors such as independent noise conditions and auxiliary variables. However, these approaches often focus on dimension-wise identifiability, which can be difficult to scale in real-world applications with ...

    2020

  8. [29]

    This would re- quireQ2 i=1nci tasks for2language components and Qm i=1nci + 1tasks formlanguage components

    It is the same in the case where more than2language components evolved, where we want to have enough combinations of the rest language components’ values. This would re- quireQ2 i=1nci tasks for2language components and Qm i=1nci + 1tasks formlanguage components. Once the laten...

    2021

  9. [30]

    For each languauge componentl i, we maximize the conditional mutual information between it and its corresponding language-controlled componentc i and minimize the summation of the conditional mutual information between it and the other language-controlled componentcj. TX t=1 m...

    2018

  10. [32]

    To best achieve the identifiability condition, we choose the common language component system that include most tasks,verbandobject

    A.5.2 META-WORLD Environemnt DetailsMeta-World is a benchmark suite of50robotic manipulation environments designed for multitask and meta-reinforcement learning, where each task is accompanied by a corre- sponding language description. To best achieve the identifiability condi...

    2023

  11. [33]

    from https://github.com/danijar/dreamerv3, and use the medium version for all experiments. For visual-based multi-task SAC (MT-SAC), we take the visual-based SAC implementation from https://github.com/KarlXing/RL-Visual-Continuous-Control and modified it to the multi-task SAC ...

    2021

  12. [34]

    World Model Component deterministic size 512 Component stochastic size 16 Component classes 32 CNN depth 48 Reward&Cont layers 2 Reward&Cont units 512 Actor&Critic layers 3 Actor&Critic units 640 Task embedding dim 128 Token embedding dim 128 Mask types [decoder, reward, cont]...

    2025

  13. [36]

    These methods are often dimension-wise and fail to scale effectively to complex systems with interdependent latent structures

    and TCL (Hyvarinen & Morioka, 2016), focus on identifying latent variables under strong assumptions like independence of noise terms or specific priors on functional forms. These methods are often dimension-wise and fail to scale effectively to complex systems with interdepend...

    2016

  14. [1997]

    However, their methodologies and applications diverge significantly

    share a conceptual similarity in their focus on decomposing tasks into smaller, more manageable components. However, their methodologies and applications diverge significantly. HRL typically structures policies into hierarchies, such as high-level managers setting subgoals for...

    2019

  15. [1999]

    and temporal causal representation learning (Yao et al., 2021; 2022; Song et al.,

    2021

  16. [2003]

    Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G

    12 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 V olodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G. Belle- mare, Alex Graves, Martin A. Riedmiller, Andreas Kirkeby Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charlie Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioanni...

    2025

  17. [2008]

    Adarl: What, where, and how to adapt in transfer reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02729,

    Biwei Huang, Fan Feng, Chaochao Lu, Sara Magliacane, and Kun Zhang. Adarl: What, where, and how to adapt in transfer reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02729,

    arXiv

  18. [2009]

    semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:587067

    URLhttps://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:587067. Kun Zhang and Aapo Hyvarinen. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2599,

    arXiv

  19. [2012]

    Early approaches like Meta-RL and invariant representa- tion learning (Lee et al., 2019; Hansen & Wang, 2020; Yuan et al., 2022; Nair et al.,

    14 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 A APPENDIX A.1 RELATEDWORK Generalization in Reinforcement Learning.Generalization in reinforcement learning (RL) re- mains a core challenge, particularly when agents need to adapt to unseen task variations or environ- ments with...

    2025

  20. [2016]

    Hiroshi Morioka and Aapo Hyv¨arinen

    URLhttps: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6875312. Hiroshi Morioka and Aapo Hyv¨arinen. Causal representation learning made identifiable by grouping of observational variables.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15709,

    arXiv

  21. [2017]

    Improving dictionary learning with gated sparse autoen- coders.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16014,

    Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum, Vikrant Varma, J ´anos Kram´ar, Rohin Shah, and Neel Nanda. Improving dictionary learning with gated sparse autoen- coders.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16014,

    arXiv

  22. [2018]

    Yan Duan, John Schulman, Xi Chen, Peter L

    URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54448010. Yan Duan, John Schulman, Xi Chen, Peter L. Bartlett, Ilya Sutskever, and P. Abbeel. Rl 2: Fast reinforcement learning via slow reinforcement learning.ArXiv, abs/1611.02779,

    arXiv

  23. [2019]

    World models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122,

    David Ha and J¨urgen Schmidhuber. World models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122,

    arXiv

  24. [2020]

    Nicklas Hansen, Hao Su, and Xiaolong Wang

    URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:227209033. Nicklas Hansen, Hao Su, and Xiaolong Wang. Td-mpc2: Scalable, robust world models for contin- uous control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16828,

    arXiv

  25. [2021]

    Proxi- mal policy optimization algorithms.ArXiv, abs/1707.06347,

    John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proxi- mal policy optimization algorithms.ArXiv, abs/1707.06347,

    arXiv

  26. [2022]

    Kwiatkowska, Joelle Pineau, Yarin Gal, and Doina Precup

    Amy Zhang, Clare Lyle, Shagun Sodhani, Angelos Filos, Marta Z. Kwiatkowska, Joelle Pineau, Yarin Gal, and Doina Precup. Invariant causal prediction for block mdps.ArXiv, abs/2003.06016, 2020a. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212717971. Amy Zhang, Rowan Thomas McAll...

    2003 arXiv

  27. [2023]

    Generalization in reinforcement learning by soft data augmen- tation.2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    11 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Nicklas Hansen and Xiaolong Wang. Generalization in reinforcement learning by soft data augmen- tation.2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 13611– 13617,

    2025

  28. [2024]

    Towards causal representation learning.ArXiv, abs/2102.11107,

    Bernhard Scholkopf, Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Nan Rosemary Ke, Nal Kalchbren- ner, Anirudh Goyal, and Yoshua Bengio. Towards causal representation learning.ArXiv, abs/2102.11107,

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.