Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 55 references

TopoDiT-3D: Topology-Aware Diffusion Transformer with Bottleneck Structure for 3D Point Cloud Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A topology-aware diffusion transformer beats DiT-3D on 3D point clouds by feeding loop and void structure through a learned bottleneck.

desk verdict Useful architecture paper — the bottleneck plus global conditioning buys real gains over DiT-3D — but the abstract overclaims the topology-specific story because the ablations never add a non-topological global condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09140 v1 pith:L2Q6FWES submitted 2025-05-14 cs.CV

Zechao Guan , Feng Yan , Shuai Du , Lin Ma , Qingshan Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords 3DpointcloudgenerationdiffusiontransformerpersistenthomologypersistenceimagesPerceiverResamplerbottleneckstructureShapeNet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a diffusion transformer for 3D point-cloud generation can be made better and cheaper by explicitly feeding it global shape-topology information. The model, TopoDiT-3D, extracts loops and voids from each shape using persistent homology, converts them into persistence images, and injects them as tokens through a Perceiver-based bottleneck that also compresses away redundant voxel tokens. On ShapeNet chairs, airplanes, and cars, it reports lower 1-NNA and higher coverage than DiT-3D and other DDPM and non-DDPM baselines, with a 65% training-time reduction at the largest model scale. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's claim to be that topological structure and local geometry are complementary, and that the bottleneck is the piece that lets a diffusion transformer combine them.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pairing of persistence images with the Perceiver Resampler bottleneck. Persistence images are stable vector representations of persistent homology: each birth-death pair from the filtration of a Vietoris-Rips complex is mapped by $T(x,y)=(x,y-x)$ onto a grid and smeared with Gaussian functions to form an image, giving the network a fixed-size global summary of loops and voids. A pretrained VAE supplies these images during denoising, since the noisy point clouds themselves have unclear topology. The Perceiver Resampler is a multi-head cross-attention module with learnable latent queries ($M=96$ for downsampling, $M=L$ for upsampling) that compresses the full voxel-patch token sequence down to a small fixed set before the DiT blocks and reconstructs it afterward, so the token count entering self-attention no longer grows with voxel resolution. The two topology tokens enter alongside patch tokens as keys and values, letting learned queries either mirror the topology signal, in a consistency mode, or split their attention between local and global cues, in a complementarity mode.

What would settle it

Train TopoDiT-3D with the persistence-image branch replaced by a global condition of matched capacity that carries no topology, such as a learned per-class embedding or a VAE latent of the same dimension, keeping the identical bottleneck. If the 1-NNA and coverage scores stay statistically indistinguishable from the persistence-image version, the claim that topological information is the active ingredient would be falsified; if the topology version still wins clearly, the claim survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

TopoDiT-3D's central claim is that global topological priors derived from persistent homology, encoded as persistence images for one- and two-dimensional features (loops and voids), can be fused with local point-voxel patch tokens inside a diffusion transformer, and that doing so improves both the quality and the diversity of generated point clouds while lowering training cost. The architecture couples a Perceiver Resampler bottleneck to the DiT backbone: a small set of learned queries cross-attends to the long patch-token sequence plus two topology tokens, cutting the number of tokens that enter self-attention, and an upsampling resampler then restores spatial positions with 3D position embeddings. Because noisy intermediate point clouds do not have reliable topology, a pretrained VAE generates the persistence images at inference time to act as global conditions. The paper reports that the full configuration lifts coverage by roughly 11 points over the Small baseline while lowering 1-NNA by about 6 to 9 points, reaches performance comparable to DiT-3D-XL/4 with only 30 A100 hours of training, and scales favorably to larger voxel resolutions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's claim that the gains come from topological content rests on ablations that remove the persistence-image tokens but never replace them with an equally sized non-topological global condition, so the improvement could in principle come from having any strong global prior rather than from the topology itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, a diffusion transformer can treat shape topology as a first-class condition: feeding the same noise with different persistence images changes the fine structure of the generated shapes, so topology is not merely a training signal but an operative input.
  • The bottleneck decouples token count from voxel resolution, so higher-resolution point clouds can be used without an explosion in transformer cost; the paper reports the best metrics at voxel size 64.
  • The model preserves DiT's scalability: larger model sizes steadily improve 1-NNA and coverage, and the Small configuration with the full bottleneck and topology beats the DiT-3D-XL/4 baseline.
  • On categories with very few training samples, such as mug (149 shapes) and bottle (340 shapes), the topology-conditioned model still outperforms DiT-3D, suggesting the global prior partly compensates for scarce data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ablations do not isolate topology from 'any strong global condition': a non-topological global latent of comparable size fed through the same bottleneck might capture much of the gain, and a direct comparison would settle whether the homological content specifically matters.
  • Because persistence images come from a pretrained VAE and condition the denoiser, the pipeline suggests a route to controllable generation: editing a persistence image, for instance adding a void or a loop, should push the generated point cloud to develop that structure.
  • The consistency and complementarity correlation patterns between queries and tokens could serve as a general diagnostic for what information a diffusion transformer actually absorbs, beyond this particular architecture.
  • The bottleneck idea need not be tied to topology: the same resampling mechanism could inject normals, semantic labels, or other auxiliary 3D signals into a diffusion transformer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TopoDiT-3D, a diffusion transformer for 3D point cloud generation that inserts a Perceiver Resampler bottleneck between patchification and the DiT blocks, and injects global topological information encoded as persistence images (PI-1 and PI-2) computed via persistent homology. A pretrained VAE generates persistence images at inference time because noisy point clouds lack reliable topological structure. Experiments on the ShapeNet chair, airplane, and car categories report improvements in 1-NNA and COV over DiT-3D and other baselines, together with reduced training cost, and ablations study the bottleneck, position embedding, topological information, model scale, voxel/patch size, and Perceiver design. The authors conclude that global topological information is important for 3D point cloud generation and that the bottleneck structure improves both quality and efficiency.

Significance. If the reported gains hold, TopoDiT-3D is a practically useful architecture: the Perceiver-style bottleneck decouples the number of tokens entering the DiT block from voxel resolution, and the paper reports substantial training-efficiency gains (about 65% training-time reduction for the XL model and a 3.1x speedup on the 55-category setting). The manuscript also provides code and videos, and the ablations are consistently organized around the main components. The central interpretation, however, is not yet established: the experiments do not separate the effect of topological content from the effect of adding a pretrained global conditioning pathway, and no uncertainty quantification is provided for the claimed state-of-the-art results.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Table 2] The attribution of the gains to topological information is confounded by the design difference between the last two rows of Table 2. Row 4 (bottleneck plus position embedding, no topology) has no global conditioning at all, while row 5 additionally receives topology tokens produced by a pretrained VAE and a separate MLP module. The improvement could therefore come from a generic global prior, an extra conditioning pathway, or simply the two additional tokens in cross-attention, rather than from the topological content of persistence images. The authors should add a non-topological global conditioning baseline of comparable capacity—for example, a class embedding, a VAE on global shape features, or a pooled global token—and report the same metrics. Without such a baseline, the abstract's claim that rich topological information drives the improvement is not supported.
  2. [Section 5.1 and Table 1] All quantitative claims are based on single numbers with no error bars, multiple seeds, or statistical significance tests. Metrics such as 1-NNA and COV are computed over a finite reference set and are known to be noisy; several of the reported improvements over DiT-3D are small (for example, chair COV-CD +2.06 and COV-EMD +2.3 in Table 1). The authors should run the main comparison and the key ablations with multiple random seeds and report means and standard deviations, or at least verify that the differences are significant relative to run-to-run variation. This is load-bearing for the headline claim of state-of-the-art performance.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Appendix B.1] At inference time the topology tokens are generated by sampling from a pretrained VAE prior, rather than being estimated from the noisy point cloud or from the target shape. The paper therefore needs to demonstrate quantitatively that the VAE-generated persistence images preserve the topology of the originals; Appendix B.1 only shows visually similar images and training loss curves. Without such a check, the mechanism attributed to 'topological information' could instead be a generic shape prior. A useful control would be to compare generation quality when conditioning on original persistence images, VAE-reconstructed persistence images, and random or shuffled persistence images with the same marginal statistics.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 9] The right panel caption reads 'The effects of ???' and appears to be an incomplete placeholder; the authors should replace it with the actual quantity being ablated, such as the number of FPS key points NPD.
  2. [Section 5.1 and Figure 2] The text says the models are trained for '10,000 epochs', which for a diffusion model with 1000 diffusion steps is likely intended to be training iterations or update steps; please clarify the terminology.
  3. [Table 4] The table header contains the typo 'Defalut' for 'Default'.
  4. [Section 4.2, Eq. (1)] The notation is inconsistent: the persistence surface uses phi_u, but the subsequent Gaussian is written as g_u(x,y; sigma); please unify the symbols.
  5. [Table 2 and Section 4.3] The ablation of 'position embedding' is difficult to follow because the table does not specify where the position embedding is applied in each configuration; for the row without the bottleneck structure, the meaning of adding position embedding after the DiT block should be stated explicitly.
  6. [Section 5.3] The sentence 'By using the Perceiver Resampler, the model efficiently represents voxel features with just 16 learned queries...' is not clearly tied to a particular row of Table 4; please refer explicitly to the Q=16 configuration and explain the 97% token-reduction calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical benchmarks and external baselines; the topology attribution confound is a methodological issue, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

TopoDiT-3D is an empirical architecture paper, not a derivation from first principles. Its claimed chain is: standard DDPM formulation; persistence images computed from point clouds via persistent homology (external, cited TDA methodology); a Perceiver Resampler bottleneck that compresses patch tokens and injects topology tokens; training with the usual L2 noise-prediction loss; and evaluation against external published baselines such as DiT-3D, PVD, and LION. No equation in the paper constructs a reported metric from a fitted parameter, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The central comparison is to the published DiT-3D baseline, not to a quantity defined in terms of TopoDiT-3D's own outputs. Table 2's ablations add or remove components, and the row labeled 'Topological Information' also introduces a pretrained VAE and an extra conditioning pathway, so the causal attribution of the gain specifically to persistence-image content is not cleanly isolated; however, that is an experimental confound, not a circular step. The paper explicitly states that noisy point clouds lack clear topological structure and that the VAE generates persistence images as global priors, so the VAE is not being used to predict the model's own output. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The derivation is therefore self-contained with respect to the defined circularity patterns, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on several engineering assumptions that are only partially ablated: PI faithfulness, FPS homology preservation, and the confounding of topology content with VAE conditioning. Hyperparameters such as M=96, depth=6, NPD=64, VAE latent 128, and the unstated PI grid resolution are hand-chosen and only partly swept.

free parameters (5)
  • Number of Perceiver Resampler queries (M) = 96
    Hand-chosen default in Section 5.1; ablation over Q=16 and Q=128 in Table 4 shows the choice affects 1-NNA and COV.
  • Perceiver Resampler depth = 6
    Hand-chosen default; Figure 9 ablates depth {2,6,12}, and performance varies.
  • Number of FPS key points NPD = 64
    Chosen to balance persistent homology cost and fidelity; Figure 9 ablates {0,12,64,128}, and NPD=0 degrades results.
  • VAE latent dimension = 128
    From Appendix Figure 10; not ablated, and the fidelity of generated persistence images depends on it.
  • Persistence image grid resolution n and Gaussian sigma = not stated (sigma often 1)
    Equation (2) in Section 4.2 requires a grid resolution; the paper never states n, and this controls topology token detail.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Persistent homology, summarized by persistence images, is a reliable global descriptor that improves point cloud generation
    Section 4.2 assumes topology tokens carry useful conditioning signal; no theoretical guarantee, only empirical ablation.
  • domain assumption Farthest point sampling with NPD=64 preserves the relevant homology of the original point cloud
    Section 5.1 relies on this approximation; cited to [46] but not verified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The pretrained VAE produces persistence images that are faithful proxies for target-shape topology at inference
    Section 4.2 and Appendix B.1 use VAE-generated PIs as global priors; if sampled PIs are not topological, the condition degenerates to noise.
  • standard math Standard DDPM forward and reverse processes apply unchanged to voxelized point clouds
    Section 3.1 follows Ho et al. [42]; this is standard background, not the paper's contribution.
  • domain assumption ShapeNet preprocessing and the 1-NNA and COV metrics with CD and EMD are trusted evaluation tools
    Section 5.1 adopts PointFlow splits and prior metrics without independent validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TopoDiT-3D: Topology-Aware Diffusion Transformer with Bottleneck Structure for 3D Point Cloud Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L2Q6FWES

@misc{pith2026250509140,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TopoDiT-3D: Topology-Aware Diffusion Transformer with Bottleneck Structure for 3D Point Cloud Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L2Q6FWES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09140}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Diffusion Transformer (DiT) models have significantly improved 3D point cloud generation. However, existing methods primarily focus on local feature extraction while overlooking global topological information, such as voids, which are crucial for maintaining shape consistency and capturing complex geometries. To address this limitation, we propose TopoDiT-3D, a Topology-Aware Diffusion Transformer with a bottleneck structure for 3D point cloud generation. Specifically, we design the bottleneck structure utilizing Perceiver Resampler, which not only offers a mode to integrate topological information extracted through persistent homology into feature learning, but also adaptively filters out redundant local features to improve training efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that TopoDiT-3D outperforms state-of-the-art models in visual quality, diversity, and training efficiency. Furthermore, TopoDiT-3D demonstrates the importance of rich topological information for 3D point cloud generation and its synergy with conventional local feature learning. Videos and code are available at https://github.com/Zechao-Guan/TopoDiT-3D.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gancraft: Unsupervised 3d neural rendering of minecraft worlds

    Zekun Hao, Arun Mallya, Serge Belongie, and Ming-Yu Liu. Gancraft: Unsupervised 3d neural rendering of minecraft worlds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    3d volumetric modeling with introspective neural networks

    Wenlong Huang, Brian Lai, Weijian Xu, and Zhuowen Tu. 3d volumetric modeling with introspective neural networks. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Deformable shape completion with graph convolutional autoencoders

    Or Litany, Alex Bronstein, Michael Bronstein, and Ameesh Makadia. Deformable shape completion with graph convolutional autoencoders. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Masked diffusion transformer is a strong image synthesizer

    Shanghua Gao, Pan Zhou, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Shuicheng Yan. Masked diffusion transformer is a strong image synthesizer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Dit-3d: Exploring plain diffusion transformers for 3d shape generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    Shentong Mo, Enze Xie, Ruihang Chu, Lanqing Hong, Matthias Niessner, and Zhenguo Li. Dit-3d: Exploring plain diffusion transformers for 3d shape generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. 10

    2024

  7. [7]

    Topological data analysis.Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 2018

    Larry Wasserman. Topological data analysis.Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    Stability of persistence diagrams

    David Cohen-Steiner, Herbert Edelsbrunner, and John Harer. Stability of persistence diagrams. In Proceedings of the twenty-first annual symposium on Computational geometry, 2005

    2005

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Computing persistent homology

    Afra Zomorodian and Gunnar Carlsson. Computing persistent homology. InProceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Computational geometry, 2004

    2004

  2. [10]

    Persistence homology of networks: methods and applications.Applied Network Science, 2019

    Mehmet E Aktas, Esra Akbas, and Ahmed El Fatmaoui. Persistence homology of networks: methods and applications.Applied Network Science, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390, 2023

    Anas Awadalla, Irena Gao, Josh Gardner, Jack Hessel, Yusuf Hanafy, Wanrong Zhu, Kalyani Marathe, Yonatan Bitton, Samir Gadre, Shiori Sagawa, et al. Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01390, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01378, 2023

    Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hanbo Zhang, Cunjun Yu, Jie Xu, Hongtao Wu, Chilam Cheang, Ya Jing, Weinan Zhang, Huaping Liu, et al. Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01378, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Robouniview: Visual-language model with unified view representation for robotic manipulaiton.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18977, 2024

    Fanfan Liu, Feng Yan, Liming Zheng, Chengjian Feng, Yiyang Huang, and Lin Ma. Robouniview: Visual-language model with unified view representation for robotic manipulaiton.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18977, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Multimodal-gpt: A vision and language model for dialogue with humans

    Tao Gong, Chengqi Lyu, Shilong Zhang, Yudong Wang, Miao Zheng, Qian Zhao, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Ping Luo, and Kai Chen. Multimodal-gpt: A vision and language model for dialogue with humans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04790, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation

    Yaoqing Yang, Chen Feng, Yiru Shen, and Dong Tian. Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Multiresolution tree networks for 3d point cloud processing

    Matheus Gadelha, Rui Wang, and Subhransu Maji. Multiresolution tree networks for 3d point cloud processing. InProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Variational autoencoders for deforming 3d mesh models

    Qingyang Tan, Lin Gao, Yu-Kun Lai, and Shihong Xia. Variational autoencoders for deforming 3d mesh models. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Autosdf: Shape priors for 3d completion, reconstruction and generation

    Paritosh Mittal, Yen-Chi Cheng, Maneesh Singh, and Shubham Tulsiani. Autosdf: Shape priors for 3d completion, reconstruction and generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Learning a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3d generative-adversarial modeling.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016

    Jiajun Wu, Chengkai Zhang, Tianfan Xue, Bill Freeman, and Josh Tenenbaum. Learning a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3d generative-adversarial modeling.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    Point encoder gan: A deep learning model for 3d point cloud inpainting.Neurocomputing, 2020

    Yikuan Yu, Zitian Huang, Fei Li, Haodong Zhang, and Xinyi Le. Point encoder gan: A deep learning model for 3d point cloud inpainting.Neurocomputing, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    3d point cloud generative adversarial network based on tree structured graph convolutions

    Dong Wook Shu, Sung Woo Park, and Junseok Kwon. 3d point cloud generative adversarial network based on tree structured graph convolutions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Learning representations and generative models for 3d point clouds

    Panos Achlioptas, Olga Diamanti, Ioannis Mitliagkas, and Leonidas Guibas. Learning representations and generative models for 3d point clouds. InInternational conference on machine learning, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Softflow: Probabilistic framework for normalizing flow on manifolds.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

    Hyeongju Kim, Hyeonseung Lee, Woo Hyun Kang, Joun Yeop Lee, and Nam Soo Kim. Softflow: Probabilistic framework for normalizing flow on manifolds.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    C-flow: Conditional generative flow models for images and 3d point clouds

    Albert Pumarola, Stefan Popov, Francesc Moreno-Noguer, and Vittorio Ferrari. C-flow: Conditional generative flow models for images and 3d point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Clip-forge: Towards zero-shot text-to-shape generation

    Aditya Sanghi, Hang Chu, Joseph G Lambourne, Ye Wang, Chin-Yi Cheng, Marco Fumero, and Ka- mal Rahimi Malekshan. Clip-forge: Towards zero-shot text-to-shape generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Pointflow: 3d point cloud generation with continuous normalizing flows

    Guandao Yang, Xun Huang, Zekun Hao, Ming-Yu Liu, Serge Belongie, and Bharath Hariharan. Pointflow: 3d point cloud generation with continuous normalizing flows. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019. 11

    2019

  19. [27]

    Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021

    Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021

    Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Uni-controlnet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    Shihao Zhao, Dongdong Chen, Yen-Chun Chen, Jianmin Bao, Shaozhe Hao, Lu Yuan, and Kwan- Yee K Wong. Uni-controlnet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion

    Xiaoxiao Long, Yuan-Chen Guo, Cheng Lin, Yuan Liu, Zhiyang Dou, Lingjie Liu, Yuexin Ma, Song-Hai Zhang, Marc Habermann, Christian Theobalt, et al. Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern...

    2024

  23. [31]

    Make-it-3d: High-fidelity 3d creation from a single image with diffusion prior

    Junshu Tang, Tengfei Wang, Bo Zhang, Ting Zhang, Ran Yi, Lizhuang Ma, and Dong Chen. Make-it-3d: High-fidelity 3d creation from a single image with diffusion prior. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Dream3d: Zero-shot text-to-3d synthesis using 3d shape prior and text-to-image diffusion models

    Jiale Xu, Xintao Wang, Weihao Cheng, Yan-Pei Cao, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Shenghua Gao. Dream3d: Zero-shot text-to-3d synthesis using 3d shape prior and text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Diffusion probabilistic models for 3d point cloud generation

    Shitong Luo and Wei Hu. Diffusion probabilistic models for 3d point cloud generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    3d shape generation and completion through point-voxel diffusion

    Linqi Zhou, Yilun Du, and Jiajun Wu. 3d shape generation and completion through point-voxel diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Lion: Latent point diffusion models for 3d shape generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    Arash Vahdat, Francis Williams, Zan Gojcic, Or Litany, Sanja Fidler, Karsten Kreis, et al. Lion: Latent point diffusion models for 3d shape generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data.Acta Numerica, 2014

    Gunnar Carlsson. Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data.Acta Numerica, 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    3d point cloud segmentation using topological persistence

    William J Beksi and Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos. 3d point cloud segmentation using topological persistence. In2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    A topology layer for machine learning

    Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson, Bradley J Nelson, Anjan Dwaraknath, and Primoz Skraba. A topology layer for machine learning. InInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Persistent homology based graph convolution network for fine- grained 3d shape segmentation

    Chi-Chong Wong and Chi-Man V ong. Persistent homology based graph convolution network for fine- grained 3d shape segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Learning persistent homology of 3d point clouds.Computers & Graphics, 2022

    Chi Zhou, Zhetong Dong, and Hongwei Lin. Learning persistent homology of 3d point clouds.Computers & Graphics, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Persistence images: A stable vector representation of persistent homology.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2017

    Henry Adams, Tegan Emerson, Michael Kirby, Rachel Neville, Chris Peterson, Patrick Shipman, Sofya Chepushtanova, Eric Hanson, Francis Motta, and Lori Ziegelmeier. Persistence images: A stable vector representation of persistent homology.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Vietoris–rips complexes of planar point sets.Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2010

    Erin W Chambers, Vin De Silva, Jeff Erickson, and Robert Ghrist. Vietoris–rips complexes of planar point sets.Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013

    Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Clément Levrard.Distance functions estimation: contributions to support inference and clustering.PhD thesis, Université Paris Cité, 2022. 12

    2022

  39. [47]

    Setvae: Learning hierarchical composition for generative modeling of set-structured data

    Jinwoo Kim, Jaehoon Yoo, Juho Lee, and Seunghoon Hong. Setvae: Learning hierarchical composition for generative modeling of set-structured data. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Discrete point flow networks for efficient point cloud generation

    Roman Klokov, Edmond Boyer, and Jakob Verbeek. Discrete point flow networks for efficient point cloud generation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Get3d: A generative model of high quality 3d textured shapes learned from images

    Jun Gao, Tianchang Shen, Zian Wang, Wenzheng Chen, Kangxue Yin, Daiqing Li, Or Litany, Zan Gojcic, and Sanja Fidler. Get3d: A generative model of high quality 3d textured shapes learned from images. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Black, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Liam Paull, and Weiyang Liu

    Zhen Liu, Yao Feng, Michael J. Black, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Liam Paull, and Weiyang Liu. Meshdiffu- sion: Score-based generative 3d mesh modeling. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Stability of persistence diagrams

    David Cohen-Steiner, Herbert Edelsbrunner, and John Harer. Stability of persistence diagrams. In Proceedings of the twenty-first annual symposium on Computational geometry, pages 263–271, 2005

    2005

  44. [52]

    Persistent homology: a step-by-step introduction for newcomers

    Ulderico Fugacci, Sara Scaramuccia, Federico Iuricich, Leila De Floriani, et al. Persistent homology: a step-by-step introduction for newcomers. InSTAG, pages 1–10, 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    A survey of topological machine learning methods

    Felix Hensel, Michael Moor, and Bastian Rieck. A survey of topological machine learning methods. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4:681108, 2021

    2021

  46. [54]

    Persistent-homology-based machine learning: a survey and a comparative study.Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7):5169–5213, 2022

    Chi Seng Pun, Si Xian Lee, and Kelin Xia. Persistent-homology-based machine learning: a survey and a comparative study.Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7):5169–5213, 2022. 13 Appendix In this appendix, we provide the following detailed material: • Section A offers precise de...

    2022

  47. [55]

    Every face of a simplex fromXis also inX

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.