pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.09298 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Resonator as a Directional Quantum Emitter

Luiz O. R. Solak , Bruno L. Vermes , Antonio S. M. de Castro , Celso J. Villas-Boas , Daniel Z. Rossatto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords single-photon sourcetwo-photon Jaynes-Cummingsquantum resonatorquantum emitterphoton indistinguishabilitycoherent pulse conversionquantum information processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum resonator acts as the single-photon emitter in a two-photon Jaynes-Cummings system while the atom stays in its ground state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates a single-photon source where a quantum resonator, rather than a two-level system, serves as the emitter in a two-photon Jaynes-Cummings interaction. This setup keeps the two-level system in its ground state at all times, shielding the emission process from atomic dephasing and other losses. Consequently, the source delivers single photons with superior efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability compared to conventional Jaynes-Cummings sources under identical conditions. It further enables the direct conversion of a coherent pulse containing one photon on average into a single-photon output exceeding 90 percent in key metrics while using up the entire input energy. Such a system could support more reliable photon generation for quantum information tasks across different physical platforms.

Core claim

In the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model, the resonator acts as the quantum emitter while the two-level system remains in the ground state throughout the dynamics. This role reversal yields single-photon pulses with efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability above 90 percent from a coherent drive with mean photon number one, outperforming the standard model and eliminating energy waste since the full pulse is consumed.

What carries the argument

Two-photon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian with the resonator designated as the directional emitter and the two-level system held in the ground state

If this is right

  • The source outperforms conventional Jaynes-Cummings models in efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability when parameters are matched.
  • A coherent pulse with average photon number one converts directly into a single-photon pulse consuming the full input energy.
  • The resonator-based emission supports implementation across multiple physical platforms for quantum technologies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Robustness to atomic losses may permit operation in environments with higher noise than traditional atom-based sources allow.
  • The design could simplify integration into resonator-dominated quantum networks where the cavity is already the primary element.
  • Similar role reversals might extend to multi-photon processes for generating more complex quantum states.

Load-bearing premise

The two-photon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian and chosen parameter regime capture all relevant dynamics without extra loss channels or higher-order effects that would degrade the performance metrics.

What would settle it

A simulation or experiment that includes realistic atomic dephasing or additional loss channels and measures efficiency or indistinguishability below 90 percent under the stated parameters would falsify the superiority claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09298 by Antonio S. M. de Castro, Bruno L. Vermes, Celso J. Villas-Boas, Daniel Z. Rossatto, Luiz O. R. Solak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Pictorial illustration of the system setup. A two-level atom is confined in a two-sided cavity with decay rate of field amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Efficiency, (b) purity and (c) indistinguishability of the single-photon source as functions of the pulse duration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Dynamics of the probabilities of finding the intracavity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Pairs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy spectrum of the JC interaction when varying the cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability of a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-photon sources are essential for testing fundamental physics and for the development of quantum technologies. In this work a single-photon source is investigated, based on a two-photon Jaynes-Cummings system, where the resonator works as the quantum emitter rather than the two-level system. This role reversal provides certain advantages, such as robustness against losses from the two-level system (e.g., dephasing), as it remains in its ground state throughout the entire dynamics. This provides higher efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability compared to sources based on the usual Jaynes-Cummings model under the same parameter conditions in both models. Another advantage of this system is the possibility of direct conversion of a coherent excitation pulse with one photon on average to a single-photon pulse with efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability above $90\%$. Since the entire excitation pulse is consumed in the generation of a single photon, the system also minimizes energy waste. The potential for implementing the two-photon JC model across different platforms expands the possibilities for controlled single-photon generation in applications in quantum information processing and computation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a single-photon source based on a two-photon Jaynes-Cummings system in which the resonator functions as the directional quantum emitter rather than the two-level system (TLS). The role reversal is presented as conferring robustness to TLS losses (e.g., dephasing) because the TLS remains in its ground state. The work claims higher efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability than the conventional Jaynes-Cummings model under identical parameters, plus the ability to convert a coherent pulse with mean photon number one directly into a single-photon pulse with all three metrics above 90% while minimizing energy waste. Potential implementation across platforms is discussed.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are substantiated by complete derivations and exhaustive error analysis, the approach would supply a loss-robust route to high-quality single photons with reduced energy consumption. The platform-agnostic framing and explicit comparison to the standard Jaynes-Cummings case could broaden experimental options in quantum information processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model Hamiltonian and Results sections] The central quantitative assertions (>90% efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability for direct conversion of a coherent state with ⟨n⟩=1) rest on the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian plus included decay terms being complete. The abstract states superiority under the same parameter conditions as the usual Jaynes-Cummings model, yet any omitted single-photon coupling, TLS spontaneous emission, or cavity loss not suppressed in the two-photon regime would directly lower the reported metrics. A concrete verification—showing that the metrics remain above 90% when these channels are restored—is required to support the robustness claim.
  2. [Dynamics and population analysis] The statement that the TLS remains in its ground state throughout the dynamics is load-bearing for the dephasing-robustness advantage. The manuscript must demonstrate that this holds for the chosen parameter regime and that residual population in the excited state does not degrade indistinguishability below the claimed threshold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model section] Notation for the two-photon coupling strength and the coherent-drive amplitude should be defined explicitly at first use and kept consistent between the Hamiltonian and the numerical results.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the exact parameter values (g, κ, γ, drive strength) used for each plotted curve so that the comparison to the standard Jaynes-Cummings case can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be incorporated to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model Hamiltonian and Results sections] The central quantitative assertions (>90% efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability for direct conversion of a coherent state with ⟨n⟩=1) rest on the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian plus included decay terms being complete. The abstract states superiority under the same parameter conditions as the usual Jaynes-Cummings model, yet any omitted single-photon coupling, TLS spontaneous emission, or cavity loss not suppressed in the two-photon regime would directly lower the reported metrics. A concrete verification—showing that the metrics remain above 90% when these channels are restored—is required to support the robustness claim.

    Authors: We agree that a complete verification including all relevant decay channels is necessary to substantiate the robustness claim. In the revised manuscript we will add numerical results that restore the single-photon coupling term, TLS spontaneous emission, and cavity loss. These simulations will demonstrate that, within the two-photon regime and for the parameter set used in the original calculations, efficiency, purity, and indistinguishability remain above 90 percent, thereby confirming that the omitted channels do not degrade the reported metrics below the stated threshold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dynamics and population analysis] The statement that the TLS remains in its ground state throughout the dynamics is load-bearing for the dephasing-robustness advantage. The manuscript must demonstrate that this holds for the chosen parameter regime and that residual population in the excited state does not degrade indistinguishability below the claimed threshold.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need for explicit demonstration. While the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings interaction keeps the TLS predominantly in the ground state, the revised manuscript will include time-resolved population plots of the TLS excited state. These plots will show that the excited-state population stays below 0.5 percent throughout the dynamics for the chosen parameters. We will additionally quantify the effect of this residual population on photon indistinguishability and confirm that the metric remains above 90 percent, thereby supporting the claimed dephasing robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims follow from model dynamics without reduction to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper derives the claimed advantages (robustness to TLS losses, higher efficiency/purity/indistinguishability, and >90% direct conversion from coherent pulse) as consequences of the role reversal in the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, where the resonator emits while the TLS stays in ground state. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter renamed as output, nor invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The comparison to standard JC under identical parameters is presented as an external benchmark within the model, not a self-referential loop. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated Hamiltonian and parameter regime, with no evidence that the metrics are forced by construction from the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings interaction is treated as a standard model whose validity is assumed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1305 out tokens · 37136 ms · 2026-05-22T15:46:33.330641+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Lounis and M

    B. Lounis and M. Orrit, Single-photon sources, Rep. Prog. Phys 68, 1129 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Sangouard and H

    N. Sangouard and H. Zbinden, What are single photons good for?, J. Mod. Opt.59, 1458 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    M. E. Reimer and C. Cher, The quest for a perfect single-photon source, Nat. Photon.13, 734 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Thomas and P

    S. Thomas and P. Senellart, The race for the ideal single-photon source is on, Nat. Nanotechnol.16(2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and J. Milburn, G, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London)409, 46 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 135 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Raussendorf and J

    R. Raussendorf and J. Harrington, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with High Threshold in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 190504 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vuˇckovi´c, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon.3, 687 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, In- tegrated photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon.14, 273–284 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    D. C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, Observation of Simultane- ity in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 84 (1970)

    work page 1970

  11. [11]

    C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Experimental realization of a local- ized one-photon state, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 58 (1986)

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    J. Fan, A. Migdall, and L. J. Wang, Efficient generation of cor- related photon pairs in a microstructure fiber, Opt. Lett.30, 3368 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    J. E. Sharping, M. Fiorentino, A. Coker, P. Kumar, and R. S. Windeler, Four-wave mixing in microstructure fiber, Opt. Lett. 26, 1048 (2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. Milburn,Quantum Optics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Wang, Y .-M

    H. Wang, Y .-M. He, T.-H. Chung, H. Hu, Y . Yu, S. Chen, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, J. Qin, X. Yang, R.-Z. Liu, Z.-C. Duan, J.-P. Li, S. Gerhardt, K. Winkler, J. Jurkat, L.-J. Wang, N. Gregersen, Y .-H. Huo, Q. Dai, S. Yu, S. H¨ofling, C.-Y . Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Towards optimal single-photon sources from po- larized microcavities, Nat. Photon.13, 770 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. L ¨obl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, and R. J. Warburton, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 399 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    D. P. Ornelas-Huerta, A. N. Craddock, E. A. Goldschmidt, A. J. Hachtel, Y . Wang, P. Bienias, A. V . Gorshkov, S. L. Rolston, and J. V . Porto, On-demand indistinguishable single photons from an efficient and pure source based on a rydberg ensemble, Optica7, 813 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    S. Shi, B. Xu, K. Zhang, G.-S. Ye, D.-S. Xiang, Y . Liu, J. Wang, D. Su, and L. Li, High-fidelity photonic quantum logic gate based on near-optimal Rydberg single-photon source, Nat. Commun.13, 4454 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Andrini, F

    G. Andrini, F. Amanti, F. Armani, V . Bellani, V . Bonaiuto, S. Cammarata, M. Campostrini, T. H. Dao, F. De Matteis, V . Demontis, G. Di Giuseppe, S. Ditalia Tchernij, S. Donati, A. Fontana, J. Forneris, R. Francini, L. Frontini, R. Gunnella, S. Iadanza, A. E. Kaplan, C. Lacava, V . Liberali, F. Marzioni, E. Nieto Hern ´andez, E. Pedreschi, P. Piergentili...

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Keller, B

    M. Keller, B. Lange, K. Hayasaka, W. Lange, and H. Walther, Continuous generation of single photons with controlled wave- form in an ion-trap cavity system, Nature (London)431, 1075 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    D. B. Higginbottom, L. Slodi ˇcka, G. Araneda, L. Lachman, R. Filip, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, Pure single photons from a trapped atom source, New J. Phys.18, 093038 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Kuhn and D

    A. Kuhn and D. Ljunggren, Cavity-based single-photon sources, Contemp. Phys.51, 289 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Esmann, S

    M. Esmann, S. C. Wein, and C. Ant ´on-Solanas, Solid-state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum ma- terials, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2315936 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Y . Yan, Y . Cheng, S. Guan, D. Yu, and Z. Duan, Pulse-regulated single-photon generation via quantum interference in aχ (2) nonlinear nanocavity, Optics Letters43, 5086 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, J

    E. Zubizarreta Casalengua, J. C. L ´opez Carre ˜no, F. P. Laussy, and E. del Valle, Tuning photon statistics with coherent fields, Phys. Rev. A101, 063824 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Duan, Q. Guo, S. Guan, M. Xie, and C. Liu, Photon blockade in a bimode nonlinear nanocavity embedded with a 7 quantum dot, Phys. Rev. A102, 053713 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Duan, Q. Guo, C. Liu, S. Guan, and Y . Ren, Anti- bunching effect of photons in a two-level emitter-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A100, 063834 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Sukumar and B

    C. Sukumar and B. Buck, Multi-phonon generalisation of the jaynes-cummings model, Physics Letters A83, 211 (1981)

    work page 1981

  29. [29]

    Singh, Field statistics in some generalized Jaynes-Cummings models, Phys

    S. Singh, Field statistics in some generalized Jaynes-Cummings models, Phys. Rev. A25, 3206 (1982)

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    E. I. Aliskenderov, K. A. Rustamov, A. S. Shumovsky, and T. Quang, On the Jaynes-Cummings model with multiphoton transitions in a cavity, J. Phys. A20, 6265 (1987)

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    Felicetti, D

    S. Felicetti, D. Z. Rossatto, E. Rico, E. Solano, and P. Forn- D´ıaz, Two-photon quantum Rabi model with superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A97, 013851 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    C. J. Villas-Boas and D. Z. Rossatto, Multiphoton Jaynes- Cummings Model: Arbitrary Rotations in Fock Space and Quantum Filters, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 123604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Zou, X.-Y

    F. Zou, X.-Y . Zhang, X.-W. Xu, J.-F. Huang, and J.-Q. Liao, Multiphoton blockade in the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model, Phys. Rev. A102, 053710 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Li, L.-B

    H.-J. Li, L.-B. Fan, S. Ma, J.-Q. Liao, and C.-C. Shu, Exploring photon blockade in a two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model with atom and cavity drivings, Phys. Rev. A110, 043707 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Y .-H. Zhou, T. Liu, Q.-P. Su, X.-Y . Zhang, Q.-C. Wu, D.-X. Chen, Z.-C. Shi, H. Z. Shen, and C.-P. Yang, Universal photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    D. J. Gauthier, Q. Wu, S. E. Morin, and T. W. Mossberg, Re- alization of a continuous-wave, two-photon optical laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 464 (1992)

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    Brune, J

    M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, P. Goy, L. Davidovich, and S. Haroche, Realization of a two-photon maser oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1899 (1987)

    work page 1987

  38. [38]

    V ogel and R

    W. V ogel and R. L. d. M. Filho, Nonlinear Jaynes-Cummings dynamics of a trapped ion, Phys. Rev. A52, 4214 (1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [39]

    D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Generation of Nonclassical Motional States of a Trapped Atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1796 (1996)

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    Felicetti, J

    S. Felicetti, J. S. Pedernales, I. L. Egusquiza, G. Romero, L. Lamata, D. Braak, and E. Solano, Spectral collapse via two- phonon interactions in trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A92, 033817 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    del Valle, S

    E. del Valle, S. Zippilli, F. P. Laussy, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, G. Morigi, and C. Tejedor, Two-photon lasing by a single quan- tum dot in a high-Qmicrocavity, Phys. Rev. B81, 035302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Singh, M

    H. Singh, M. Das, and P. K. Pathak, Continuous two-photon source using a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal cavity, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53, 155503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Neilinger, M

    P. Neilinger, M. Reh ´ak, M. Grajcar, G. Oelsner, U. H ¨ubner, and E. Il’ichev, Two-photon lasing by a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. B91, 104516 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Alushi, T

    U. Alushi, T. Ramos, J. J. Garc ´ıa-Ripoll, R. Di Candia, and S. Felicetti, Waveguide QED with quadratic light-matter inter- actions, PRX Quantum4, 030326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Dephasing of a flux-qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator

    P. Bertet, I. Chiorescu, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, De- phasing of a flux-qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0507290 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    Felicetti, M.-J

    S. Felicetti, M.-J. Hwang, and A. Le Boit ´e, Ultrastrong- coupling regime of nondipolar light-matter interactions, Phys. Rev. A98, 053859 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    E. V . Stolyarov, V . L. Andriichuk, and A. M. Sokolov, Two- photon coupling via Josephson element: Breaking the symme- try with magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B111, 214517 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sab ´ın, P. Forn-D´ıaz, F. Quijandr´ıa, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Observation of three-photon spontaneous parametric down- conversion in a superconducting parametric cavity, Phys. Rev. X10, 011011 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Bienfang, T

    J. Bienfang, T. Gerrits, P. Kuo, A. Migdall, S. Polyakov, and O. T. Slattery,Single-photon sources and detectors dictionary (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010)

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Breuer and F

    H. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python frame- work for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    D. A. Steck, Quantum and atom optics (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    J. Peng, J. Tang, P. Tang, Z. Ren, J. Tian, N. Barraza, G. A. Barrios, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and F. Albarr ´an-Arriagada, Deterministic single-photon source in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A108, L031701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    P. Kaer, N. Gregersen, and J. Mork, The role of phonon scatter- ing in the indistinguishability of photons emitted from semicon- ductor cavity QED systems, New J. Phys.15, 035027 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)

    R. Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)

    work page 2000