Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quantum-State-Controlled Collisions of Ultracold Polyatomic Molecules

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper measures collisions of ultracold polyatomic CaOH molecules in single quantum states and shows that the measured loss rates match calculations based only on long-range dipolar interactions and universal short-range loss, with…

desk verdict First ultracold polyatomic collision measurements with state control; solid experiment, but the quantitative agreement with theory leans on an untested universal-loss assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09592 v1 pith:RHPCGFZD submitted 2025-05-14 physics.atom-ph

Nathaniel B. Vilas , Paige Robichaud , Christian Hallas , Junheng Tao , Loïc Anderegg , Grace K. Li , Hana Lampson , Lucie D. Augustovičová
show 2 more authors
John L. Bohn John M. Doyle
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords ultracoldmoleculespolyatomicCaOHparitydoubletscollisionalshieldingelectric-fielddependenceevaporativecoolinguniversallossregime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first measurements of collisions between ultracold polyatomic molecules: optically trapped CaOH at roughly 100 microkelvin. The authors measure inelastic loss rate constants for molecules in the vibrational ground state and in single quantum states of the parity-doubled bending mode, and trace how each rate changes as an applied electric field goes from 0 to 600 V/cm. They argue that all the measured rates are explained by long-range dipolar interactions together with universal short-range loss, with no need to model the short-range chemistry in detail. The central consequence is that certain parity-doublet states have repulsive long-range potentials that keep molecules apart, suppressing short-range loss; the calculations indicate these states reach elastic-to-inelastic ratios near 200 around 10 microkelvin, which is favourable for evaporative cooling toward quantum degeneracy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the parity doublet of the eX(010) bending mode: pairs of opposite-parity molecular states split by only about 21.5 MHz. Because this splitting is small, the electric dipole of one molecule can virtually excite the other between these states at second order, producing an interaction that scales as $1/r^6$ with a coefficient $C_6 \sim d^4/(24 q_\ell)$; for the lower-parity manifold this potential is attractive and for the upper-parity manifold repulsive. When an electric field is applied, the parameter $\beta \sim 2\langle dE\rangle/2q_\ell$ controls how much the parity states mix; this turns on a first-order dipolar interaction and an inelastic relaxation coupling that scales as $\beta/(1+\beta^2)$ at long range. The argument proceeds by close-coupling scattering calculations over the resulting effective potentials, with an absorbing boundary condition at $r_0 = 30a_0$ that removes any flux reaching short range.

What would settle it

Measure the loss rate for the d manifold at E=500 V/cm from 100 microkelvin down to about 1 microkelvin and compare with the universal-model curve: the model predicts a constant inelastic rate with the elastic-to-inelastic ratio peaking near 200 at roughly 10 microkelvin, so any clear deviation in the absolute loss rate from that curve would indicate sub-unity short-range loss or additional long-range physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The measured collisional loss rate constants of CaOH in eX(000) and in the eX(010) bending mode, and of single hyperfine states within the bending mode as a function of electric field, agree with close-coupling calculations that include only long-range dipolar interactions and universal short-range loss. The parity-doublet structure of the bending mode—opposite-parity states split by about 21.5 MHz—makes the van der Waals interaction roughly a hundred times stronger than in the vibrational ground state, and determines its sign: lower-parity manifolds attract, while upper-parity manifolds (d, e, f) experience repulsive $C_6/r^6$ potentials that block molecules from reaching short range. At zero field the shielded d and f states lose molecules at rates 5–10 times lower than the attractive a and c states, and at high field the d state retains zero lab-frame dipole and remains shielded, with the remaining loss dominated by long-range dipolar relaxation. For these shielded states the calculations predict elastic-to-inelastic ratios of about 200 near 10 microkelvin, favourable for evaporative cooling.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume that every CaOH–CaOH collision reaching a separation of 30 Bohr radii is lost with unit probability, so if real short-range reactions or complex formation are less efficient or channel-dependent, the absolute calculated rates—and the claimed agreement with the measured absolute rates—would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Short-range chemistry enters ultracold CaOH collision rates only as a universal absorbing boundary: absolute loss rates follow from the long-range dipole-dipole interaction and the molecule's dipole moment, parity splitting, and mass.
  • The shielded d and f states are credible starting points for evaporative cooling to quantum degeneracy, with elastic-to-inelastic ratios near 200 at about 10 microkelvin.
  • Because the shielding factor is expected to grow with parity-doublet splitting, dipole moment, and mass, other directly laser-coolable polyatomic molecules with larger ℓ-doubling may support even more efficient evaporative cooling.
  • Near 1 microkelvin, electrostatic field-linked states of CaOH should appear, allowing collision tuning and, potentially, assembly of (CaOH)2 dimers.
  • The measurements benchmark future polyatomic collision theory: a six-state, electric-field-dependent dataset is reproduced without short-range potential details.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if universal short-range loss holds for CaOH, the same treatment should transfer to other laser-coolable polyatomics such as CaOCH3 and CaNH2, predicting a similar 5–10-fold loss suppression in their upper-parity manifolds, scaled by their ℓ-doubling and dipole moment.
  • Inference: the repulsive d and f states may also reduce two-body loss in optical tweezer arrays of polyatomic molecules, where collisional loss between neighbouring traps limits coherence; this could be tested by holding a d-state and an a-state molecule in adjacent tweezers and measuring loss versus electric field.
  • Inference: the resonant features seen at intermediate fields, attributed to curve crossings, could be analysed with the same close-coupling machinery to reveal quasi-bound states and to probe the short-range potential indirectly.
  • Inference: comparing CaOH with CaOD would isolate the role of the parity-doublet splitting and reduced mass, providing a clean experimental test of the predicted scaling of C6 and of the universal loss rates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports the first ultracold (≲100 µK) collisions between a polyatomic molecule. Using a high-density conveyor-belt MOT and an optical dipole trap, the authors prepare CaOH in the vibrational ground state and in the bending mode, measure two-body loss rate constants in hyperfine mixtures, and then prepare single hyperfine states in the N=1 bending-mode manifold and measure loss rate constants as functions of electric field. They compare the measurements with close-coupling calculations that include the long-range dipolar interaction and assume universal short-range loss via an absorbing boundary at r0=30a0. They find order-of-magnitude variations across the six field-dressed manifolds a–f, identify states with repulsive long-range potentials that suppress short-range loss, and calculate elastic-to-inelastic ratios near γ≈200 at ~10 µK for these states, which they argue is favorable for evaporative cooling.

Significance. The experimental platform and state control are state-of-the-art; the paper delivers the first quantitative collisional data for ultracold polyatomic molecules in the few-partial-wave regime, and the identification of parity-doublet states with repulsive potentials and high predicted shielding ratios is a concrete step toward quantum degeneracy of polyatomic molecules. The close-coupling calculations are parameter-free in the target collision rates, using prior spectroscopic constants and dipolar matrix elements, and the measured field-dependent ordering across the a–f manifolds is robust. The main caveat is that the quantitative agreement with theory hinges on the universal short-range loss assumption, which is not yet reconciled with the measured ~50% deficit relative to the single-channel universal limit in Fig. 1(c).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III and Supplemental Material XII] The measured mixture rates in Fig. 1(c) are about 50% below the single-channel universal limit: k(000)=0.7(2) vs 1.3 and k(010)=2.9(9) vs 6.1 (units of 10^-10 cm^3/s). The close-coupling calculations in Fig. 2(c) and the central conclusion in Section VI both rely on the assumption of universal short-range loss, implemented as a unit absorbing boundary Y_nn=-ik_n at r0=30a0 (Supplemental XII). The manuscript does not reconcile this deficit with the universal assumption, nor does it test the sensitivity of the calculated curves to the choice of r0 or to a sub-universal loss probability. Please show whether the full close-coupling model reproduces the Fig. 1 mixture rates, and discuss how a non-universal short-range loss probability would change the comparison in Fig. 2(c).
  2. [Section IV and Supplemental Material IX] The low single-state rates in Fig. 2(c) (particularly the d and f manifolds at E=0 and at high field) are obtained after subtracting a background rate k_bg≈7(3)×10^-11 cm^3/s. This background is comparable to or larger than the reported rates for the most shielded states. The estimate of k_bg depends on a rate-equation model with a fitted parameter k_ij(ℓ_i=0,ℓ_j=1)=2.5×10^-10 cm^3/s and an assumed state-preparation purity of 78(8)%. Because the shielding conclusion in Section V rests on these small corrected rates, the authors should present the raw fitted rates with and without background subtraction and demonstrate that the ordering of rates across manifolds is robust to the uncertainties in k_bg and purity.
  3. [Supplemental Material XII] The close-coupling results are obtained with a fixed basis size (N_ch=839–1961), a starting radius r0=30a0, and a matching radius rm=10^4 a0, but no convergence tests are reported. Since the quantitative agreement in Fig. 2(c) is a central result, the authors should provide a demonstration that the calculated rate coefficients are converged with respect to L_max, the number of channels, and the choice of r0 (e.g., r0=20a0 and 40a0, L_max=12 and 20).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 2(c) caption] The caption states that the shaded regions denote 'standard error,' but the text describes them as including systematic uncertainties in density and background rate; please reconcile the wording.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (1)] The rate-equation model in Eq. (1) is cited to Ref. [37]; a brief statement of the origin of the 1/4 prefactor in the temperature equation would help readers.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 3 caption] The caption says hyperfine structure, magnetic fields, and AC Stark shifts are neglected in the adiabatic potentials, while Supplemental Fig. S8 includes them; please clarify whether any of these terms affect the qualitative features discussed in the text.
  4. [Section IV, state preparation] The text says approximately 80% of molecules are in the target state during the collision time, while Table I and the supplement quote 78(8)%; using a single consistent value with uncertainty would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the theoretical rate constants are parameter-free close-coupling outputs; the only fitted input is an auxiliary background correction.

full rationale

I examined the derivation chain and found no step in which a claimed prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or definition. The central claim, that measured CaOH loss rates are consistent with calculations including only long-range dipolar interactions and universal short-range loss (Conclusion, Section VI), is backed by close-coupling calculations in Supplemental Material XII. These calculations propagate the coupled radial Schrodinger equations from r0 = 30a0 with the absorbing boundary condition Y_nn = -ik_n, using Hamiltonian parameters taken from independent spectroscopy (B = 9997 MHz, gamma = 35.5 MHz, q_l = 21.5 MHz, d = 1.465 D; Supplement X). No parameter is fitted to the collision data to produce the theoretical curves in Figs. 2 and 4; the predictions of shielding and the gamma ~ 200 elastic-to-inelastic ratios follow from these same parameter-free calculations. The only fitted numerical input in the analysis is the background collision rate k_bg ~ 7(3)e-11 cm3/s, estimated in Supplemental IX from a rate-equation model benchmarked with auxiliary hold-time data (Fig. S7). That background correction does not encode the target-state loss rate constants and is subtracted before the comparison, so it cannot manufacture the agreement between the computed and measured field-dependent rates. Self-citations to prior work by the same group (Refs. 61, 64, 70) supply the theoretical framework that this experiment tests, rather than an unexamined premise; no uniqueness theorem is invoked and no predicted rate is equivalent by construction to a fitted parameter. The universal short-range loss assumption is explicit and may be physically debatable, but an assumption is not a circular reduction. Therefore no circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central rate extraction and scattering calculations rest on standard quantum scattering formalism, prior spectroscopic constants, and the universal short-range loss approximation. No new particles or forces are introduced. One effective background collision rate is fitted to auxiliary delay data; it enters only the background subtraction, not the central interaction model.

free parameters (3)
  • effective background collision rate k_ij(li=0, lj=1) = 2.5e-10 cm3/s
    Fitted so the rate-equation model matches the variable-delay benchmark data in Fig. S7; it sets the size of the subtracted background rate k_bg for single-state collision measurements.
  • single-state background collision rate k_bg = 7(3)e-11 cm3/s
    Estimated from the rate-equation model with 78(8)% target-state purity; subtracted from fitted loss rates to obtain the rates shown in Figs. 2(c) and 4. The results at low loss rates are sensitive to this correction.
  • target-state preparation purity = 78(8)%
    Estimated from the rate-equation model and benchmark data; used to compute k_bg and the systematic uncertainty in the corrected rates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Universal short-range loss: absorbing boundary at r0 = 30a0 with unit absorption probability for all channels.
    Central to the computed loss rates in Supplemental XII; unverified for CaOH but common for reactive ultracold molecules.
  • standard math Coupled-channel Schrodinger equation with log-derivative propagation and Hankel-function matching.
    Standard quantum scattering formalism used in Supplemental XII to compute cross sections and rate coefficients.
  • domain assumption Single-molecule effective Hamiltonian parameters from prior spectroscopy: B = 9997 MHz, gamma = 35.5 MHz, q_l = 21.5 MHz, b_F = 2.45 MHz, c = 2.6 MHz, d = 1.465 D, polarizability 204 a.u.
    Inputs taken from Refs. [51,53,76,91] and used throughout the Supplemental Material; small deviations would shift computed potentials.
  • domain assumption Two-body rate equation model with finite-temperature effective volume and heating term (Eq. 1 of main text).
    Used to extract k from N(t); assumes Gaussian trap geometry, elastic thermalization, and no other density-dependent loss mechanisms.
  • domain assumption Identical bosons with even partial waves only.
    Used in the coupled-channel basis (Supplemental XII); hyperfine mixture rates are treated with a distinguishable-particle approximation as discussed in Supplemental XI.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum-State-Controlled Collisions of Ultracold Polyatomic Molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RHPCGFZD

@misc{pith2026250509592,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum-State-Controlled Collisions of Ultracold Polyatomic Molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RHPCGFZD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09592}
}
read the original abstract

Collisions between ultracold calcium monohydroxide (CaOH) molecules are realized and studied. Inelastic collision rate constants are measured for CaOH prepared in ground and excited vibrational states, and the electric field dependence of these rates is measured for molecules in single quantum states of the parity-doubled bending mode. Theoretical calculations of collision rate coefficients are performed and found to agree with measured values. The lowest collisional loss rates are for states with repulsive long-range potentials that shield ultracold molecules from loss channels at short distance. These results unveil the collisional behavior of parity doublet molecules in the ultracold regime, and lay the foundation for future experiments to evaporatively cool polyatomic molecules to quantum degeneracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09592 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Observation of collisions between optically trapped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Electric field dependence of CaOH-CaOH collisions in the bending mode. (a) Single-molecule energies in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Adiabatic dipolar interaction potentials for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of rate constants for states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evolution of dipole-dipole dynamics in cold ammonia collisions

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    State-to-state ammonia collision cross sections show a local maximum whose position scales with parity splitting, evidencing suppression of dipole-dipole coupling at low energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Kozyryev and N

    I. Kozyryev and N. R. Hutzler, Precision measurement of time-reversal symmetry violation with laser-cooled poly- atomic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 133002 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Kozyryev, Z

    I. Kozyryev, Z. Lasner, and J. M. Doyle, Enhanced sen- sitivity to ultralight bosonic dark matter in the spectra of the linear radical SrOH, Phys. Rev. A103, 043313 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys

    D. DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    2002

  5. [5]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. Brennen, and P. Zoller, A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules, Nat. Phys.2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    P. Yu, L. W. Cheuk, I. Kozyryev, and J. M. Doyle, A scalable quantum computing platform using symmetric- top molecules, New J. Phys.21, 093049 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    B. R. Heazlewood and T. P. Softley, Towards chemistry at absolute zero, Nat. Rev. Chem.5, 125 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    J. F. Barry, D. McCarron, E. Norrgard, M. Steinecker, and D. DeMille, Magneto-optical trapping of a diatomic molecule, Nature512, 286 (2014)

    2014

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Anderegg, B

    L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, E. Chae, B. Hemmer- ling, N. R. Hutzler, A. Ravi, A. Collopy, J. Ye, W. Ket- terle, and J. M. Doyle, Radio frequency magneto-optical trapping of caf with high density, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 103201 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Truppe, H

    S. Truppe, H. Williams, M. Hambach, L. Caldwell, N. Fitch, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, and M. Tarbutt, Molecules cooled below the doppler limit, Nat. Phys.13, 1173 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    A. L. Collopy, S. Ding, Y. Wu, I. A. Finneran, L. An- deregg, B. L. Augenbraun, J. M. Doyle, and J. Ye, 3d magneto-optical trap of yttrium monoxide, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213201 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Z. Zeng, S. Deng, S. Yang, and B. Yan, Three- dimensional magneto-optical trapping of barium monofluoride, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 143404 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. De Miranda, A. Pe’Er, B. Neyenhuis, J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. Julienne, D. Jin, and J. Ye, A high phase-space-density gas of polar molecules, Science322, 231 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Takekoshi, L

    T. Takekoshi, L. Reichs¨ ollner, A. Schindewolf, J. M. Hut- son, C. R. Le Sueur, O. Dulieu, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Ultracold dense samples of dipo- lar RbCs molecules in the rovibrational and hyperfine ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 205301 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold dipolar gas of fermionic 23Na40K molecules in their abso- lute ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 205302 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vex- iau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an ultracold gas of ground- state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    T. M. Rvachov, H. Son, A. T. Sommer, S. Ebadi, J. J. Park, M. W. Zwierlein, W. Ketterle, and A. O. Jamison, Long-lived ultracold molecules with electric and magnetic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 143001 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    W. B. Cairncross, J. T. Zhang, L. R. B. Picard, Y. Yu, K. Wang, and K.-K. Ni, Assembly of a rovibrational ground state molecule in an optical tweezer, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123402 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Anderegg, B

    L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, L. W. Cheuk, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules, Nat. Phys.14, 890 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Anderegg, L

    L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules, Science365, 1156 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    J. T. Zhang, L. R. B. Picard, W. B. Cairncross, K. Wang, Y. Yu, F. Fang, and K.-K. Ni, An optical tweezer array of ground-state polar molecules, Quantum Science and Technology7, 035006 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    C.-W. Chou, C. Kurz, D. B. Hume, P. N. Plessow, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. Leibfried, Preparation and coherent manipulation of pure quantum states of a single molecu- lar ion, Nature545, 203 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    J. W. Park, Z. Z. Yan, H. Loh, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Second-scale nuclear spin coherence time of ultracold 23Na40K molecules, Science357(2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Burchesky, L

    S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Rotational coher- ence times of polar molecules in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 123202 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules, Nature501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules, Nature614, 64 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Miller, A

    C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Two-axis twisting using floquet-engineered xyz spin models with polar molecules, Nature633, 332 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Observation of generalized t-Jspin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions, Sci- ence388, 381 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebret- sadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Entangle- ment and iSWAP gate between molecular qubits, Nature 637, 821 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic- wavelength optical tweezers, Nature637, 827 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. De Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Qu´ em´ ener, P. Julienne, J. Bohn, D. Jin, and J. Ye, Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules, Science327, 8 853 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, D. Wang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. Neyenhuis, M. H. G. de Miranda, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin, Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime, Nature464, 1324 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    M. Guo, X. Ye, J. He, M. L. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ınez, R. Vex- iau, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and D. Wang, Dipolar collisions of ultracold ground-state bosonic molecules, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041044 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    X. Ye, M. Guo, M. L. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ınez, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and D. Wang, Collisions of ultracold 23Na87Rb molecules with controlled chemical reactivities, Science Advances4 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    P. D. Gregory, M. D. Frye, J. A. Blackmore, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Sticky col- lisions of ultracold RbCs molecules, Nature Comm.10 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, S. S. Yu, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Observa- tion of collisions between two ultracold ground-state caf molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Z. Z. Yan, J. W. Park, Y. Ni, H. Loh, S. Will, T. Kar- man, and M. Zwierlein, Resonant dipolar collisions of ul- tracold molecules induced by microwave dressing, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 063401 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    J. J. Park, Y.-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, T. V. Tscherbul, and W. Ketterle, A Feshbach resonance in collisions between triplet ground-state molecules, Nature614, 54 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    J. J. Burau, K. Mehling, M. D. Frye, M. Chen, P. Aggar- wal, J. M. Hutson, and J. Ye, Collisions of spin-polarized yo molecules for single partial waves, Phys. Rev. A110, L041306 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Idziaszek and P

    Z. Idziaszek and P. S. Julienne, Universal rate constants for reactive collisions of ultracold molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 113202 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Christianen, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold sticky collisions: Theoretical and experimental status, J. Phys. Chem. A127, 729 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Valtolina, K

    G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Ye, Dipolar evaporation of reac- tive molecules to below the Fermi temperature, Nature 588, 239 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Matsuda, L

    K. Matsuda, L. D. Marco, J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, G. Val- tolina, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and J. Ye, Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields, Sci- ence370, 1324 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Val- tolina, L. De Marco, R. R. W. Wang, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye, Tuning of dipolar in- teractions and evaporative cooling in a three-dimensional molecular quantum gas, Nat. Phys.17, 1144 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Ob- servation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules, Science373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of bose-einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature631, 289–293 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, P. Robichaud, A. Winnicki, D. Mitra, and J. M. Doyle, Magneto- optical trapping and sub-doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule, Nature606, 70 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Hallas, N

    C. Hallas, N. B. Vilas, L. Anderegg, P. Robichaud, A. Winnicki, C. Zhang, L. Cheng, and J. M. Doyle, Opti- cal trapping of a polyatomic molecule in anℓ-type parity doublet state, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 153202 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, An optical tweezer array of ul- tracold polyatomic molecules, Nature628, 282 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Anderegg, N

    L. Anderegg, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, P. Robichaud, A. Jadbabaie, J. M. Doyle, and N. R. Hutzler, Quan- tum control of trapped polyatomic molecules for eEDM searches, Science382, 665 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    L¨ ow, M

    M. L¨ ow, M. Ibr¨ ugger, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, Coherence of symmetry-protected rotational qubits in cold polyatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 113402 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Q. Wei, S. Kais, B. Friedrich, and D. Herschbach, Entan- glement of polar symmetric top molecules as candidate qubits, J. Chem Phys135, 154102 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    V. V. Albert, J. P. Covey, and J. Preskill, Robust encod- ing of a qubit in a molecule, Phys. Rev. X10, 031050 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    M. L. Wall, K. Maeda, and L. D. Carr, Simulating quan- tum magnets with symmetric top molecules, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)525, 845 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    M. Wall, K. Maeda, and L. D. Carr, Realizing un- conventional quantum magnetism with symmetric top molecules, New J. Phys.17, 025001 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    N. R. Hutzler, Polyatomic molecules as quantum sensors for fundamental physics, Quantum Science and Technol- ogy5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    B. L. Augenbraun, L. Anderegg, C. Hallas, Z. D. Las- ner, N. B. Vilas, and J. M. Doyle, Chapter two - di- rect laser cooling of polyatomic molecules, inAdvances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 72, edited by L....

    2023

  53. [61]

    A. V. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn, Collisional dynamics of ultracold OH molecules in an electrostatic field, Phys. Rev. A66, 052718 (2002)

    2002

  54. [62]

    A. V. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn, Linking ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 043006 (2003)

    2003

  55. [63]

    A. V. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn, Ultracold collisions of fermionic OD radicals, Phys. Rev. A71, 022706 (2005)

    2005

  56. [64]

    L. D. Augustoviˇ cov´ a and J. L. Bohn, Ultracold collisions of polyatomic molecules: CaOH, New J. Phys.21, 103022 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    L. D. Augustoviˇ cov´ a and J. L. Bohn, NO evaporative cooling in the 2Π3/2 state, Phys. Rev. A97, 062703 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Field-linked resonances of polar molecules, Nature614, 59 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    X.-Y. Chen, S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, A. Schindewolf, F. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules, Nature 626, 283 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    X. Wu, T. Gantner, M. Koller, M. Zeppenfeld, S. Cher- venkov, and G. Rempe, A cryofuge for cold-collision ex- periments with slow polar molecules, Science358, 645 9 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Koller, F

    M. Koller, F. Jung, J. Phrompao, M. Zeppenfeld, I. M. Rabey, and G. Rempe, Electric-field-controlled cold dipo- lar collisions between trapped CH 3F molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 203401 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    J. L. Bohn, Inelastic collisions of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A63, 052714 (2001)

    2001

  63. [71]

    Hallas, G

    C. Hallas, G. K. Li, N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, L. Anderegg, and J. M. Doyle, High compression blue- detuned magneto-optical trap of polyatomic molecules, arXiv:2404.03636 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    G. K. Li, C. Hallas, and J. M. Doyle, Conveyor-belt magneto-optical trapping of molecules, New J. Phys.27, 043002 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, P. Robichaud, C. Zhang, S. Dawley, L. Cheng, and J. M. Doyle, Black- body thermalization and vibrational lifetimes of trapped polyatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A107, 062802 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    See the Supplemental Material for more details

  67. [75]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Λ-enhanced imaging of molecules in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 083201 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    Steimle, D

    T. Steimle, D. Fletcher, K. Jung, and C. Scurlock, A supersonic molecular beam optical stark study of CaOH and SrOH, J. Chem. Phys.96, 2556 (1992)

    1992

  69. [77]

    M. T. Bell and T. P. S. and, Ultracold molecules and ultracold chemistry, Mol. Phys.107, 99 (2009)

    2009

  70. [78]

    Jurgilas, A

    S. Jurgilas, A. Chakraborty, C. J. H. Rich, L. Caldwell, H. J. Williams, N. J. Fitch, B. E. Sauer, M. D. Frye, J. M. Hutson, and M. R. Tarbutt, Collisions between ultracold molecules and atoms in a magnetic trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 153401 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    J. L. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor, Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases, New J. Phys.11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  72. [80]

    H. R. Sadeghpour, J. L. Bohn, M. J. Cavagnero, B. D. Esry, I. I. Fabrikant, J. H. Macek, and A. R. P. Rau, Col- lisions near threshold in atomic and molecular physics, J. Phys. B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics33, R93 (2000)

    2000

  73. [81]

    Caldwell, J

    L. Caldwell, J. Devlin, H. Williams, N. Fitch, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, and M. Tarbutt, Deep laser cooling and efficient magnetic compression of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 033202 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    Y. Wu, J. J. Burau, K. Mehling, J. Ye, and S. Ding, High phase-space density of laser-cooled molecules in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 263201 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    Kozyryev, L

    I. Kozyryev, L. Baum, K. Matsuda, and J. M. Doyle, Pro- posal for laser cooling of complex polyatomic molecules, ChemPhysChem17, 3641 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Mitra, N

    D. Mitra, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, L. Baum, C. Miller, S. Raval, and J. M. Doyle, Direct laser cooling of a symmetric top molecule, Science369, 1366 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    B. L. Augenbraun, J. M. Doyle, T. Zelevinsky, and I. Kozyryev, Molecular asymmetry and optical cycling: Laser cooling asymmetric top molecules, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031022 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    Frenett, Z

    A. Frenett, Z. Lasner, L. Cheng, and J. M. Doyle, Vi- brational branching fractions for laser cooling of nonlin- ear strontium-containing molecules, Phys. Rev. A110, 022811 (2024). 10 Supplemental Material VII. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS A. Experimental sequence The experiment begin...

    2024

  79. [87]

    Because this transition is only allowed by tensor AC Stark shifts (which mix states with ∆M F =±2), we use a relatively high trap depth of∼960µK when driving this transition

    Preparing the a and f states To prepare theaandfstates, we drive RFπpulses between the (N= 1,J= 1/2 −,F= 0)↔(N= 1,J= 3/2+,F= 2,m F = 2) states atE= 0 V/cm andB= 1.8 G. Because this transition is only allowed by tensor AC Stark shifts (which mix states with ∆M F =±2), we use a ...

  80. [88]

    To reach both states, we use two 40 GHz microwave tran- sitions viaN= 2, since direct RF transitions froma tobandcare electric dipole forbidden

    Preparing the b and c states Thebandcstates both start asJ= 3/2 − atE= 0, then split apart at fields aboveE ∼60 V/cm. To reach both states, we use two 40 GHz microwave tran- sitions viaN= 2, since direct RF transitions froma tobandcare electric dipole forbidden. We begin by tu...

  81. [89]

    Preparing the d state To prepare molecules in thedstate, we again use two microwave transitions viaN= 2. In this case, we start by applying a 2 G magnetic field, then ramp the elec- tric field up to 150 V/cm and use an ARP electric field sweep to transfer population to (N= 2,J...

  82. [90]

    corrected

    Preparing the e state Theestate undergoes significant avoided crossings be- low around 90 V/cm, and at zero field is the same as the fstate (Fig. S5). Therefore, we only prepare theestate at fields above 90 V/cm. We start the same way as for thedstate, using an ARP electric fi...

  83. [91]

    = 2.5×10 −10 cm3 s−1. Fig. S6(b-c) shows the fraction of molecules in the tar- get collision state during the collision sequence for (b) the dstate atE= 0 and (c) theastate atE= 0, as modeled by the rate equations. In both cases, we see that approx- imately 75-80% of molecules...

  84. [92]

    For simplic- ity, we will ignore fine and hyperfine structure due to the electron and nuclear spin, which are spectator degrees of freedom

    Vibrational ground state The simplest case is to consider two molecules in the N= 0 rotational level of the eX(000) vibronic ground state, which does not have parity-doubling. For simplic- ity, we will ignore fine and hyperfine structure due to the electron and nuclear spin, w...

  85. [93]

    Our experimental measurements were in the lowest-lying rotational state,N= 1

    Vibrational bending mode We now consider the eX(010) vibrational bending mode. Our experimental measurements were in the lowest-lying rotational state,N= 1. In this state, the 2nd-order perturbation sum, eqn. 12, is dominated by coupling to nearby parity doublet states, and we...

    1961

  86. [94]

    Zhang, B

    C. Zhang, B. L. Augenbraun, Z. D. Lasner, N. B. Vilas, J. M. Doyle, and L. Cheng, Accurate prediction and mea- surement of vibronic branching ratios for laser cooling linear polyatomic molecules, J. Chem. Phys.155, 091101 (2021)

    2021

  87. [95]

    Hirota,High-Resolution Spectroscopy of Transient Molecules, Springer Series in Chemical Physics, Vol

    E. Hirota,High-Resolution Spectroscopy of Transient Molecules, Springer Series in Chemical Physics, Vol. 40 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985)

    1985

  88. [96]

    Merer and J

    A. Merer and J. Allegretti, Rotational energies of linear polyatomic molecules in vibrationally degenerate levels of electronic 2Σ and 3Σ states, Canadian Journal of Physics 49, 2859 (1971)

    1971

  89. [97]

    Caldwell and M

    L. Caldwell and M. R. Tarbutt, Sideband cooling of molecules in optical traps, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013251 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Li and J

    M. Li and J. A. Coxon, High-resolution analysis of the fundamental bending vibrations in the ˜A2Π and ˜X 2Σ+ states of CaOH and CaOD: Deperturbation of Renner- Teller, spin-orbit and K-type resonance interactions, J. Chem. Phys.102, 2663 (1995). 22 FIG. S10. Calculated collisi...

    1995

  91. [99]

    J. M. Brown and A. Carrington,Rotational spectroscopy of diatomic molecules(Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  92. [100]

    M. D. Frye, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson, Cold atomic and molecular collisions: approaching the universal loss regime, New J. Phys.17, 045019 (2015)

    2015

  93. [101]

    Mukherjee, M

    B. Mukherjee, M. D. Frye, C. R. Le Sueur, M. R. Tarbutt, and J. M. Hutson, Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033097 (2023)

    2023

  94. [102]

    B. R. Johnson, The multichannel log-derivative method for scattering calculations, Journal of Computational Physics13, 445 (1973)

    1973

  95. [103]

    J. F. E. Croft, J. L. Bohn, and G. Qu´ em´ ener, Unified model of ultracold molecular collisions, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033306 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.