Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Evolution of dipole-dipole dynamics in cold ammonia collisions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cold ammonia collisions show a local maximum in cross sections because effective dipole moments switch off at low energy.

desk verdict First clean observation of the predicted local maximum and dipole switch-off in parity-doublet collisions; experiment carries the paper, truncated CC basis is a real but secondary caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24239 v1 pith:MC654CBO submitted 2026-07-27 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-ph

Yao Chang , André J.A. van Roij , Stach E.J. Kuijpers , Sven Herbers , Etienne F. Walraven , Tijs Karman , Sebastiaan Y.T. van de Meerakker This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph PACS 34.50.Ez37.10.Mn82.20.Xr
keywords coldpolarmoleculesdipole-dipolecollisionsparitydoubletlocalmaximumammoniaisotopologuesmergedmolecularbeamsvelocitymapimagingstate-to-statecrosssections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that collisions between polar molecules with parity doublets do not keep getting stronger as energy falls, as classical Langevin capture would predict. Using a novel beam merger, the authors measure state-to-state cross sections for ammonia isotopologues (and NO–NH3) from about 0.3 to 100 cm−1 and find a clear local maximum whose position tracks the molecules’ parity-splitting energies. Below that maximum, velocity-map images of correlated recoil show that mutual parity flips (driven by dipole–dipole coupling) are suppressed in favor of single-partner flips (dipole–quadrupole). The result matters because many cold-molecule experiments and theories assume dipoles stay “on”; if they can switch off, inelastic rates, evaporative cooling prospects, and field-control strategies all change in a concrete way.

What carries the argument

The local maximum (LM) from self-polarization of parity doublets: when the dipole–dipole energy at the classical turning point exceeds the parity splittings, opposite-parity states mix and Langevin capture is recovered; when it does not, the dipoles switch off. A merged-guide beam geometry plus recoil-resolved VMI separates mutual-flip (d–d) from single-flip (d–q) channels.

What would settle it

Recompute the integral cross sections with a substantially larger rotational basis (or measure an independent system with known higher-j channels open) and check whether the local-maximum position and the low-energy d–d versus d–q branching still match the reported experiment and the Δ^{4/3} scaling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

State-to-state integral cross sections for ND3–ND3, ND3–NH3, NH3–NH3, and NO–NH3 exhibit a local maximum whose peak energy scales with total parity splitting Δ as E_peak ∝ Δ^{4/3} μ C_3^{2/3}. At energies above and near the peak, dipole–dipole coupling drives mutual parity flips in both partners; below the peak the effective dipoles switch off, dipole–dipole channels collapse, and dipole–quadrupole single-partner flips can dominate—directly confirmed by the recoil energy left on the detected molecule in velocity-map images.

Load-bearing premise

The ammonia–ammonia scattering calculations keep only the lowest inversion-doublet levels for each molecule and still claim reliable long-range cross sections even though the rotational basis is not fully converged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Inelastic rates for parity-doublet polar molecules can fall by large factors below the local maximum, contrary to Langevin E^{-2/3} scaling.
  • Evaporative cooling and trap-loss estimates that assume always-on dipoles need revision in the energy window around the LM.
  • Crossed- or merged-beam studies of two similar dipoles become harder exactly where the LM suppresses signal.
  • Modest external electric or magnetic fields that mix or tune the parity doublets can switch the interaction between dipole–dipole and dipole–quadrupole character at accessible energies.
  • The revised peak scaling E_peak ∝ Δ^{4/3} μ C_3^{2/3} gives a practical map for choosing which molecule pairs will show the LM in a given apparatus.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Systems without near-degenerate parity doublets (ordinary closed-shell rotors) should lack this LM and keep closer to classical dipolar capture until true ultracold Wigner thresholds.
  • Time-varying fields timed to the collision could toggle d–d versus d–q dominance shot-by-shot, offering a switchable inelastic channel without changing collision energy.
  • Secondary LMs from dipole–quadrupole coupling may set the practical floor for inelastic loss in mixed-parity-splitting pairs used for sympathetic cooling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a joint experimental–theoretical study of state-to-state inelastic |−⟩→|+⟩ (parity-flip) collisions between ammonia isotopologues (ND3–ND3, ND3–NH3, NH3–NH3) and NO–NH3 over collision energies of 0.3–100 cm⁻¹, enabled by a novel merged guide that circumvents the impossibility of merging two beams of strongly polar molecules. The authors observe a local maximum (LM) in the integral cross section for every system studied, with the peak position increasing with the total parity splitting Δ across a factor of ~16 (0.1 to 1.6 cm⁻¹). This constitutes the first experimental confirmation of the self-polarization/switch-off mechanism predicted by Tang et al. (Ref. 24). Velocity-map-imaging measurements of correlated recoil show that below the LM the mutual parity-flip (dipole–dipole) channel is suppressed relative to single-partner flip (dipole–quadrupole) channels — a dot for ND3–NH3 at the lowest energy, a dot-plus-halo for NO–NH3. Coupled-channels (CC) calculations on ab initio PESs reproduce the observations, and re-scaling the theoretical ICSs in dipole-dipole units yields a revised universal scaling law E_peak/E_dd ∝ (Δ/E_dd)^{4/3}, replacing the earlier linear Langevin estimate.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a landmark measurement for cold molecular collisions: it provides the first experimental validation of a genuinely quantum, counterintuitive scattering phenomenon (effective dipole switch-off below the LM), demonstrates its universality across four systems and a factor of ~16 in Δ, and delivers a direct channel-resolved fingerprint (correlated-recoil VMI) separating dipole–dipole from dipole–quadrupole dynamics. The experimental strengths are substantial: continuous energy scans with statistical (95% CI) error bars, Monte-Carlo flux-to-density corrections, isotope-labeled beam separation, recoil-free VUV REMPI detection, and independent cross-validation on the NO–NH3 system. The consequences the authors draw — for evaporative cooling strategies, for the interpretation of previous crossed-beam results, and for field control of dipolar collisions near 1 kV/cm — are well founded and will be widely cited. The revised 4/3 scaling law is a falsifiable, parameter-free prediction extractable by other groups. Publication is warranted subject to the points below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion; Methods (CC basis truncation)] The CC calculations truncate the rotational basis to j_k = 1_1^- and 1_1^+ for both molecules, with the statement that 'convergence with respect to the rotational basis was not necessarily reached'. The authors justify this by long-range dominance, which is plausible at LM energies since higher-j channels are closed; however, closed channels still contribute at second order through dipole coupling, renormalizing the effective C3 and hence the LM position itself. This truncation is load-bearing for three quantitative claims: (i) the quality of the theory–experiment match in Fig. 2, (ii) the E_peak values entering the revised scaling law E_peak/E_dd ∝ (Δ/E_dd)^{4/3} in Fig. 3, and (iii) the attribution of the sub-1 cm⁻¹ ND3–NH3 plateau to a dipole-quadrupole-driven secondary LM. The manuscript itself shows rotational excitation rings above ~20 cm⁻¹ that the basis cannot describe (patched w
  2. [Fig. 3 and associated text (revised scaling law)] The revised power law E_peak ∝ Δ^{4/3} μ C3^{2/3} is extracted purely from the theoretical CC curves (Fig. 3). Yet the experiment independently measures LM positions for four systems spanning Δ = 0.1–1.6 cm⁻¹, and the abstract claims the calculations 'explained the observed scaling'. The manuscript never quantitatively confronts the measured peak positions with the 4/3 law. Since experimental ICSs are scaled to theory only in overall magnitude, the peak positions are shape features independent of that normalization, and this comparison is available from data the authors already have. I ask the authors to tabulate the experimental LM positions (with collision-energy uncertainties from the horizontal error bars in Fig. 2 and from the finite energy grid) and show explicitly whether they obey E_peak ∝ Δ^{4/3} μ C3^{2/3}, or at least are consistent with it. If the experimental peak positions
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] Fig. 2 caption: 'Experimental cross sections are scaled to the theoretical ones.' Please specify the procedure — is a single global scale factor used per system over the whole energy range, and how is it determined (least squares on a restricted energy window?)? This matters for assessing which features of the agreement are and are not by construction.
  2. [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 caption: the d-d images for ND3–NH3 'were scaled for better visibility'. Please give the scaling factors, since the relative d-d vs d-q image intensities are themselves part of the argument for channel suppression.
  3. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3: the abscissa label appears garbled in the provided manuscript ('Δ/Eddσ/a2dd' overlapping); please check the figure rendering. Also indicate the numerical uncertainty with which the maxima of the computed ICS curves are located, as this propagates into the fitted exponent.
  4. [Results and Discussion (VMI simulations)] Above ~20 cm⁻¹ an isotropic DCS is assumed for the inner-ring angular distributions because the truncated basis cannot describe rotational excitation. This is reasonable as a display device, but please state explicitly in the main text (not only implicitly) that the simulated images at the highest energies are not quantitative predictions of the ring structure.
  5. [Throughout] Typos/formatting: 'unkown' (introduction); 'Theoreticalab initiomethods' (missing spaces, introduction); 'complimentary DCS measurements' should read 'complementary'; Ref. [46] contains a capitalized 'Https://doi.org'; author list shows 'Y .T.' spacing artifacts throughout. The energy-level inset in Fig. 1 would benefit from numerical Δ values for each species next to the diagram.
  6. [Data availability] The data availability statement promises a Zenodo deposit; please consider also depositing the CC input/channel basis definitions and the 2×2 minimal model (SM) so that the 4/3 scaling and the secondary-LM DWBA analysis are independently reproducible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: LM, Δ-ordering, and low-energy dipole–dipole suppression are independent experimental observations; theory is comparative support, not a self-defining input.

  1. self citation load bearing [Results Fig. 2 caption; intro discussion of LM; Ref. [24] Tang et al.]
    "The NO-ND3 data were taken from Ref. [24]. ... the occurrence of a LM in the cross section was predicted to be ubiquitous ... Recently, state-to-state inelastic collision cross sections were measured for the NO ... - ND3 ... system ... but the minimum collision energy of 0.15 cm−1 achieved was still too large to probe the LM [24]."

    The LM mechanism and the NO–ND3 baseline are imported from prior work by overlapping authors. This is ordinary scientific continuity and is not load-bearing for the new claim: the present paper’s peaks, Δ-ordering, and VMI recoil evidence are new measurements on ammonia isotopologues and NO–NH3. Flagged only as minor self-citation, not as a reduction of the result to an unverified self-cite.

full rationale

The load-bearing claims are experimental shape features: local maxima in measured ICS that move upward with total parity splitting Δ across ND3–ND3, ND3–NH3, NH3–NH3 and NO–NH3, plus VMI image sizes/halos that show suppressed mutual parity-flip recoil below the LM. Relative experimental ICS are scaled to theory only for display (‘Experimental cross sections are scaled to the theoretical ones’); that normalization cannot invent peak positions or image radii. Coupled-channels curves and the revised E_peak/E_dd ∝ (Δ/E_dd)^{4/3} law are extracted from ab initio PESs (Jing et al. NH3–NH3; prior NO–NH3 surface) and compared to data, not fitted to force the peaks. Self-citation to Tang et al. (same group) supplies the prior LM prediction and NO–ND3 baseline, but the present work’s central content is new measurements that test that prediction. Basis truncation (j=1 only) is a quantitative-assumption risk, not a circular reduction of output to input. No self-definitional identity, no fitted-parameter-as-prediction, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. Score 1 for ordinary non-load-bearing self-citation only.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The claim rests on standard quantum scattering and molecular parity structure, an ab initio PES taken from prior work, a truncated channel basis justified by long-range dominance, experimental beam-overlap simulations, and relative (not absolute) cross-section normalization. No new particles or forces are postulated; the ‘effective dipole switch-off’ is an emergent description of parity mixing under the existing dipole–dipole operator.

free parameters (2)
  • Overall ICS scale factor (experiment to theory) = system-dependent multiplicative scale (not numerically tabulated in main text)
    Experimental scattering signals are converted to relative cross sections via Monte Carlo simulations and then scaled to the theoretical ICS curves for comparison; absolute cross sections are not reported.
  • Effective beam crossing angle / merged-guide launch geometry = ~2 degrees effective crossing
    Minimum collision energy and energy calibration depend on the designed ~2° crossing and guide exit fields; small geometry errors shift the energy axis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption An isolated molecule in a non-degenerate definite-parity eigenstate has vanishing laboratory-frame electric dipole moment; dipoles require opposite-parity mixing.
    Stated in the introduction as the quantum foundation for self-polarization and the LM; standard molecular quantum mechanics.
  • ad hoc to paper Long-range multipole interactions (dipole–dipole ~1/R^3 → 1/R^6; dipole–quadrupole) dominate the inelastic |−⟩→|+⟩ dynamics in the probed energy window, so a j=1-only channel basis remains adequate.
    Explicitly invoked to justify truncated CC calculations (Results; Methods; SM) despite incomplete rotational convergence.
  • domain assumption Ab initio CCSD(T) NH3–NH3 and NO–NH3 PESs from cited prior work are sufficiently accurate at long range for ICS shapes and LM positions.
    Scattering calculations use PES of Jing et al. and Tang et al. without re-fitting to the present data.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo beam-overlap and flux-to-density simulations correctly convert raw counts into relative energy-dependent cross sections.
    Required for the ICS energy dependence in Fig. 2; detailed in SM.
  • standard math Standard coupled-channels scattering with renormalized Numerov integration and S-matrix boundary conditions yields the partial cross sections used for comparison and image simulation.
    Methods cite Johnson Numerov and standard boundary conditions.
invented entities (2)
  • Local maximum (LM) / self-polarization switch-off of effective dipoles independent evidence
    purpose: Name and interpret the non-monotonic ICS feature and the high-to-low energy crossover from Langevin-like to suppressed dipolar scattering.
    Not a new force or particle; phenomenological label for dynamics already contained in the multipole Hamiltonian and parity structure. Independent evidence is the multi-system ICS peaks plus VMI recoil fingerprints in this paper.
  • Merged guide (quadrupole-to-hexapole beam merger) independent evidence
    purpose: Experimentally overlap two similar dipolar beams at ~2° without mutual deflection that blocks conventional merged beams.
    Apparatus element (prior design paper cited); enables the measurement rather than explaining the physics by postulate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of dipole-dipole dynamics in cold ammonia collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MC654CBO

@misc{pith2026260724239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of dipole-dipole dynamics in cold ammonia collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MC654CBO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24239}
}
abstract

Cold polar molecules offer fascinating prospects for ultracold chemistry and quantum physics, including new platforms for quantum simulation or computation. However, their inherent collision properties remain largely unknown. It has proven extremely hard to experimentally probe collisions between two dipolar molecules at sufficiently low energies and high precision, as it appears fundamentally impossible to merge two beams of molecules with significant dipole moments. Here we report measurements of state-to-state cross sections for collisions between ammonia isotopologues at energies between 0.3 and 100 cm$^{-1}$ using a novel beam merger. We experimentally observed a local maximum in the cross sections that indicates the effective dipole moments can switch off at low collision energies. Scattering calculations reproduced this maximum in good agreement and explained the observed scaling with the parity splitting energies in the molecular energy level structures. Measurements of the correlated energy transfer in both collision partners yielded direct evidence of the suppression of the dipole-dipole interaction at low energies. Our results demonstrate how collisions between an important class of polar molecules evolve from the high temperature limit towards the ultracold regime in a counterintuitive way, have major consequences for the feasibility of future experiments and the interpretation of previous work, and offer distinctive opportunities to control cold molecular collisions with external fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24239 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setup. A state-selected and velocity tunable beam of 14ND3, 15ND3, 15NH3 or NO molecules is produced using a 2.6-meter-long Stark decelerator, and merged with a state-selected beam of 14ND3 or 14NH3 using a curved hexapole. Molecules from both beamlines are loaded into a merged guide in which two adjacent quadrupole traps gradually evolve into a single hexapole trap. Cros… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Collision energy dependence of integral cross sections. Experimentally observed ICSs for inelastic ammonia-ammonia (left) or NO-ammonia isotopologues (right) as a function of the collision energy. Theoretically predicted curves are determined from simulations of the experiment taking the electric field-dependent theoretical ICSs as input (see SM). Uncertainty in the simulations is indicated by the colored shaded are… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Universality of the LM position. Theoretically predicted ICS curves from coupled￾channels scattering (lower panel) are cast into dimensionless form using the dipolar length add = 2µC3/h¯ 2 and energy Edd = ¯h 2 /(2µa2 dd). Peak positions of the LM (upper panel) exhibit universality through the power law Epeak/Edd ∝ (∆/Edd) 4/3 . This revisits the earlier findings from Tang et al. [24], where a linear dependence was … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Collision energy dependence of velocity mapped ion images. Experimentally ob￾served scattering images for inelastic ND3-NH3 (left) and NO-NH3 collisions (right) as a func￾tion of the collision energy, probing the |−⟩ → |+⟩ collision-induced transition in the ND3 or NO …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Langen, T., Valtolina, G., Wang, D. & Ye, J. Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules.Nat. Phys.20, 702–712 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    & P ´erez-R´ıos, J

    Karman, T., Tomza, M. & P ´erez-R´ıos, J. Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics.Nat. Phys.20, 722–729 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    L., Rey, A

    Bohn, J. L., Rey, A. M. & Ye, J. Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter.Science357, 1002–1010 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Heazlewood, B. R. & Softley, T. P. Towards chemistry at absolute zero.Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 125–140 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Bell, M. T. & Softley, T. P. Ultracold molecules and ultracold chemistry.Mol. Phys.107, 99–132 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    & Osterwalder, A

    Dulieu, O. & Osterwalder, A. (eds.)Cold Chemistry(The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Perspective: Ultracold molecules and the dawn of cold controlled chem- istry.J

    Balakrishnan, N. Perspective: Ultracold molecules and the dawn of cold controlled chem- istry.J. Chem. Phys.145, 150901 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Ospelkaus, S.et al.Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold potassium- rubidium molecules.Science327, 853–857 (2010)

    2010

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    K.et al.Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime.Nature464, 1324–1328 (2010)

    Ni, K. K.et al.Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime.Nature464, 1324–1328 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Phys.17, 1144–1148 (2021)

    Li, J.-R.et al.Tuning of dipolar interactions and evaporative cooling in a three- dimensional molecular quantum gas.Nat. Phys.17, 1144–1148 (2021). 13

    2021

  3. [11]

    Li, J.-R.et al.Tunable itinerant spin dynamics with polar molecules.Nature614, 70–74 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Krems, R. V . Molecules near absolute zero and external field control of atomic and molec- ular dynamics.Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.24, 99–118 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    Koller, M.et al.Electric-field-controlled cold dipolar collisions between trapped CH 3F molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 203401 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Tscherbul, T. V . & Krems, R. V . Tuning bimolecular chemical reactions by electric fields. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 023201 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Krems, R. V . Cold controlled chemistry.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.10, 4079–4092 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Langen, T.et al.Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    L., Tarbutt, M

    Cornish, S. L., Tarbutt, M. R. & Hazzard, K. R. A. Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules.Nat. Phys.20, 730–740 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules.Phys

    DeMille, D. Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    2002

  11. [19]

    D., Blackmore, J

    Gregory, P. D., Blackmore, J. A., Bromley, S. L., Hutson, J. M. & Cornish, S. L. Robust storage qubits in ultracold polar molecules.Nat. Phys.17, 1149–1153 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    K., Hepworth, T

    Ruttley, D. K., Hepworth, T. R., Guttridge, A. & Cornish, S. L. Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic-wavelength optical tweezers.Nature637, 827–832 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    C.et al.Cold heteromolecular dipolar collisions.Phys

    Sawyer, B. C.et al.Cold heteromolecular dipolar collisions.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19059–19066 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Kirste, M.et al.Quantum-state resolved bimolecular collisions of velocity-controlled OH with NO radicals.Science338, 1060–1063 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    P., Fitch, N

    Parazzoli, L. P., Fitch, N. J., ˙Zuchowski, P. S., Hutson, J. M. & Lewandowski, H. J. Large effects of electric fields on atom-molecule collisions at millikelvin temperatures.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 193201 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Tang, G.et al.Quantum state–resolved molecular dipolar collisions over four decades of energy.Science379, 1031–1036 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    D., deCarvalho, R., Guillet, T., Friedrich, B

    Weinstein, J. D., deCarvalho, R., Guillet, T., Friedrich, B. & Doyle, J. M. Magnetic trapping of calcium monohydride molecules at millikelvin temperatures.Nature395, 148– 150 (1998). 14

    1998

  18. [26]

    van de Meerakker, S. Y . T., Bethlem, H. L., Vanhaecke, N. & Meijer, G. Manipulation and control of molecular beams.Chem. Rev.112, 4828–4878 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Nature572, 189–193 (2019)

    Segev, Y .et al.Collisions between cold molecules in a superconducting magnetic trap. Nature572, 189–193 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    K.et al.Evaporative cooling of the dipolar hydroxyl radical.Nature492, 396– 400 (2012)

    Stuhl, B. K.et al.Evaporative cooling of the dipolar hydroxyl radical.Nature492, 396– 400 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Softley, T. P. Cold and ultracold molecules in the twenties.Proc. R. Soc. A479, 20220806 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    J., Lu, Y .-K., Jamison, A

    Park, J. J., Lu, Y .-K., Jamison, A. O. & Ketterle, W. Magnetic trapping of ultracold molecules at high density.Nat. Phys.19, 1567–1572 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    J., Steinecker, M

    McCarron, D. J., Steinecker, M. H., Zhu, Y . & DeMille, D. Magnetic trapping of an ultracold gas of polar molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 013202 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Ni, K.-K.et al.A high phase-space-density gas of polar molecules.Science322, 231–235 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    F., McCarron, D

    Barry, J. F., McCarron, D. J., Norrgard, E. B., Steinecker, M. H. & DeMille, D. Magneto- optical trapping of a diatomic molecule.Nature512, 286–289 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    De Marco, L.et al.A degenerate fermi gas of polar molecules.Science363, 853–856 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Bigagli, N.et al.Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules.Nature 631, 289–293 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Valtolina, G.et al.Dipolar evaporation of reactive molecules to below the Fermi temper- ature.Nature588, 239–243 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Avdeenkov, A. V . & Bohn, J. L. Linking ultracold polar molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 043006 (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    L., Cavagnero, M

    Bohn, J. L., Cavagnero, M. & Ticknor, C. Quasi-universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases.New J. Phys.11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Wang, R. R. W. & Bohn, J. L. Prospects for thermalization of microwave-shielded ultra- cold molecules.Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022033 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Sykes, A. G. & Bohn, J. L. Nonequilibrium dynamics of an ultracold dipolar gas.Phys. Rev. A91, 013625 (2015). 15

    2015

  33. [41]

    Levine, R. D. & Bernstein, R. B.Molecular reaction dynamics and chemical reactivity (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)

    1987

  34. [42]

    Soley, M. B. & Heller, E. J. Ultracold molecular collisions: Quasiclassical, semiclassical, and classical approaches in the quantum regime.Chem. Rev.125, 6609–6652 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    The expectation value of the dipole momemt for a molecule in a given quantum state with even or odd parity is always zero (i.e.,⟨+|d|+⟩=⟨−|d|−⟩= 0)

    In quantum mechanics, a dipole moment arises by the dipole operator that has odd parity. The expectation value of the dipole momemt for a molecule in a given quantum state with even or odd parity is always zero (i.e.,⟨+|d|+⟩=⟨−|d|−⟩= 0)

  36. [44]

    B.et al.Quantum-state-controlled collisions of ultracold polyatomic molecules

    Vilas, N. B.et al.Quantum-state-controlled collisions of ultracold polyatomic molecules. arXiv:2505.09592(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    B.et al.Magneto-optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule.Nature606, 70–74 (2022)

    Vilas, N. B.et al.Magneto-optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule.Nature606, 70–74 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10133-2

    Robichaud, P.et al.Parity-doublet coherence times in optically trapped polyatomic molecules.Nature(2026). Https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10133-2

    2026 doi

  39. [47]

    Wu, X.et al.A cryofuge for cold-collision experiments with slow polar molecules.Sci- ence358, 645–648 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    One wavenumber corresponds to a tem- perature of 1.4 Kelvin

    We use the wavenumber (cm −1) unit for collision energy throughout, as molecules in molecular beams are not in thermal equilibrium. One wavenumber corresponds to a tem- perature of 1.4 Kelvin

  41. [49]

    Kuijpers, S. E. J.et al.Merging two molecular beams of ND 3 up to the Liouville limit. Rev. Sci. Instrum.95, 093201 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    & van de Meerakker, S

    Plomp, V ., Gao, Z. & van de Meerakker, S. Y . T. A velocity map imaging apparatus opti- mised for high-resolution crossed molecular beam experiments.Mol. Phys.119, e1814437 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Kuijpers, S. E. J.et al.Sensitive low-recoil VUV 1+1’ REMPI detection of ND 3.J. Phys. Chem. A128, 10993–11004 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    & van der Avoird, A

    Jing, A., Szalewicz, K. & van der Avoird, A. Ammonia dimer: extremely fluxional but still hydrogen bonded.Nat. Commun.13, 1470 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Johnson, B. R. The renormalized numerov method applied to calculating bound states of the coupled-channel schroedinger equation.J. Chem. Phys.69, 4678–4688 (1978)

    1978

  46. [54]

    M., van der Avoird, A

    Janssen, L. M., van der Avoird, A. & Groenenboom, G. C. Quantum reactive scattering of ultracold NH(X 3Σ−) radicals in a magnetic trap.Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 063201 (2013). 16 AcknowledgementWe thank Youp Caris for help during the initial phases of the project, and Niek Janssen ...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.