Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Monotone solutions to mean field games master equation in the L2-monotone setting

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Displacement-monotone mean field games admit unique continuous 'monotone solutions', defined without any differentiability in the measure argument, and these solutions exist under weak-strong monotonicity.

desk verdict New L2-monotone weak solution theory for MFG master equations that is worth engaging, but the abstract overstates the idiosyncratic-noise uniqueness result. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10045 v2 pith:XG7744NT submitted 2025-05-15 math.AP

Charles Meynard (CMAP) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q8949L2535D40
keywords meanfieldgamesmasterequationmonotonesolutionsdisplacementmonotonicityL2-monotonicityviscosityWassersteinspaceforward-backwardsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the mean field games master equation can be solved in a weak class—'monotone solutions'—that requires only continuity, not differentiability, with respect to probability measures. Under L²-monotonicity of the data (the Hilbert-space form of displacement monotonicity), such a solution is unique, and under additional weak-strong monotonicity and local Hölder regularity it exists, for equations without idiosyncratic noise, with common noise, and partially with idiosyncratic noise. The point is that classical smooth solutions demand heavy measure-differentiability that typical game data lack, while this notion delivers uniqueness and stability directly from a viscosity-type two-point inequality. It also yields new a priori estimates for mean field forward-backward systems, so the results apply beyond games to mean field control problems.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the auxiliary function $Z(t,X,Y)=\langle \widetilde W(t,X)-\widetilde W(t,Y),\,X-Y\rangle$ built from the Hilbert-space lift $\widetilde W(t,X)=W(t,X,\mathcal L(X))$; a monotone solution is defined by demanding that, for each fixed $(Y,V)$, the map $(t,X)\mapsto\langle \widetilde W(t,X)-V,\,X-Y\rangle$ be a viscosity supersolution of the linearized equation. Non-negativity of this two-point function at time zero propagates forward by the maximum principle, and that is precisely what yields uniqueness and L²-monotonicity of the solution without any differentiability in the measure argument. The second mechanism is the Hille–Yosida regularization of L²-monotone maps (Lemma 3.10): it produces a sequence of Lipschitz approximations that remain monotone and keep the same local continuity moduli, so existence follows by passing to the limit through the stability theorem. In the idiosyncratic-noise case the auxiliary function is $Z(t,m)=\int_{\mathbb R^{2d}}(W(t,x,\pi_d m)-V(y,\pi_{-d}m))\cdot(x-y)\,m(dx,dy)$ on $P_2(\mathbb R^{2d})$; the addition of an entropy penalty $\kappa\,\mathrm{Ent}(m)$ guarantees the minimizer has finite Fisher information (Lemma 4.8), and identity (4.4) converts the troublesome cross-derivative term $\int \mathrm{Tr}(D_xD_y\nabla_mZ)\,dm$ into the divergence of $W$, which is the step that substitutes for the missing second-order comparison theory on Wasserstein space.

What would settle it

Produce two distinct continuous monotone solutions to (2.1) for the same data $(F,G,W_0)$ satisfying L²-monotonicity and linear growth; Theorem 2.10 claims at most one, so such a pair would directly refute the paper's uniqueness mechanism. A harder but equally decisive test is to exhibit, for $\sigma_x>0$, two monotone solutions outside the closure of Lipschitz solutions to the same L²-monotone problem, which would show the restricted uniqueness of Theorem 4.13 cannot be extended.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the master equation for the control field $W$—equation (1.2), which reduces to the MFG master equation when $F=D_pH$, $G=-D_xH$ and $W=\nabla_xU$—admits a notion of 'monotone solution' that is well defined for merely continuous $W$: for any pair $(Y,V)$ of square-integrable random variables, the two-point function $Z(t,X)=\langle W(t,X,\mathcal L(X))-V,\,X-Y\rangle$ is required to be a viscosity supersolution of the linearized transport equation. Under joint L²-monotonicity of $(F,G,W_0)$ (Hypothesis 1) and linear growth (Hypothesis 2), there is at most one such solution, and it is itself L²-monotone; the same uniqueness holds for equations with common noise (Theorem 2.16) via a change of variable that turns second-order terms in the measure into finite-dimensional viscosity terms. Existence (Theorems 3.23, 3.26, 4.13–4.14) is built from the stability of monotone solutions: coefficients are smoothed by a Hille–Yosida type regularization that preserves L²-monotonicity, Lipschitz solutions are produced for the regularized problems, and the limit is a monotone solution, with coefficients that may be only Hölder or uniformly continuous in the measure. For non-degenerate idiosyncratic noise, where the Hilbertian lift fails, the auxiliary function lives on $P_2(\mathbb R^{2d})$ and an entropy penalization forces minima to have finite Fisher information; there the comparison argument, and hence uniqueness, is carried out only for solutions in the closure of Lipschitz solutions.

Load-bearing premise

In the idiosyncratic-noise case, uniqueness is proved only for monotone solutions lying in the closure of Lipschitz solutions, because the comparison principle relies on entropy penalization and finite Fisher information at minima, and it is not established for arbitrary merely continuous solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uniqueness of equilibria for displacement-monotone mean field games holds without any differentiability in the measure argument, so models with nonsmooth costs and couplings still have at most one solution.
  • Existence of monotone solutions is proved for coefficients that are only Hölder or uniformly continuous in the measure, with and without common noise, and new a priori estimates for mean field forward-backward systems follow from the same arguments.
  • With non-degenerate idiosyncratic noise, the unique monotone solution (within the closure of Lipschitz solutions) gains local $C^{2+\alpha}$ regularity in the spatial variable even when the coefficients lack it, by parabolic regularity applied through the characteristics.
  • The common-noise behaviour can be reduced to a finite-dimensional additional variable, so the whole monotone-solution machinery extends to equations whose coefficients depend on a stochastic factor, and the notion also relaxes the previously introduced flat-monotone definition.
  • The results on forward-backward systems apply directly to mean field games of control and to general mean field forward-backward systems, since the master equation is studied without assuming the coefficients are gradients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, implicit in the paper's conclusion, is to prove an infinite-dimensional analogue of the classical comparison theorem for second-order viscosity solutions on the Wasserstein space; the entropy-penalization identity (4.4) suggests the key term to control is $\int \nabla_x\log m\cdot\nabla_y\log m\,dm$.
  • The regularization of $L^2$-monotone maps in Lemma 3.10 is a reusable device: any continuous monotone function whose Hilbert-space lift is monotone admits Lipschitz monotone approximants with uniform continuity moduli, which could simplify existence proofs in other displacement-monotone settings.
  • Because monotone solutions are stable under local uniform convergence without any measure-differentiability, they could serve as the well-posedness framework for convergence proofs of numerical schemes that approximate the master equation on finite grids.
  • One possibly testable extension is whether the weak-strong monotonicity assumption can be relaxed to plain displacement monotonicity plus one-sided Lipschitz conditions, at the price of Hölder rather than Lipschitz estimates on the flow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a notion of monotone solution for mean field games master equations in the L2/displacement-monotone setting, allowing solutions that are merely continuous in the measure argument. In Section 2 the author defines the notion via viscosity supersolutions on the lifted Hilbert space, proves uniqueness and stability theorems for equations without idiosyncratic noise (Theorems 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.18), and uses a change of variables to include additive common noise. Section 3 establishes existence: Lipschitz solutions are recalled; a Hille–Yosida regularization for L2-monotone functions is developed; new a priori estimates for mean-field FBSDEs under weak-strong monotonicity are proved; and stability of monotone solutions yields existence results (Theorems 3.23, 3.26, 3.29, 3.31, 3.33). Section 4 treats idiosyncratic noise with an entropy penalization, gives stability and a partial uniqueness theorem for solutions in the closure of Lipschitz solutions (Theorems 4.7, 4.13, 4.14), and derives Hölder regularity in the space variable. The author explicitly notes in Section 5 that uniqueness with idiosyncratic noise is not treated in full generality.

Significance. If correct, the results are a meaningful extension of the monotone-solution program to displacement/L2-monotone coefficients with below-Lipschitz data. The viscosity/Stegall arguments for uniqueness and the stability theorems are carefully structured and are likely to be reusable. The Hille–Yosida regularization of L2-monotone functions and the FBSDE estimates provide new tools. The paper is honest about the main limitation of Section 4. However, because several load-bearing estimates are only sketched and the combined common/idiosyncratic noise case is asserted rather than proved, the contribution needs substantial revision before the claims are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Theorem 4.13 and Lemma 4.12] The uniqueness result for idiosyncratic noise is conditional on one solution lying in the closure of Lipschitz solutions (Definition 4.11), although the notion in Definition 4.5 applies to arbitrary continuous functions with linear growth. The proof of Lemma 4.12 uses the Lipschitz approximations in an essential way to control the cross-derivative term through identity (4.4); no argument is given for two arbitrary monotone solutions. The paper's concluding remark (Section 5) explicitly says uniqueness is not treated in full generality. The abstract and Section 1.3 should be reworded so that the conditional nature of this uniqueness claim is stated where the claim is advertised; otherwise the reader is led to believe the result covers all Definition 4.5 solutions.
  2. [Section 4.3] The extension to the full master equation (1.2) with both common noise and idiosyncratic noise is asserted without proof. The section states that 'there is no problem' and that previous uniqueness and existence results 'are consequently still valid,' but it does not carry out the transformation of Section 2.2.2 in the presence of the sigma_x terms in (1.2), nor does it verify that the hypotheses and the monotone-solution definition are preserved under this transformation. Because (1.2) is the equation announced in the abstract, this hand-wave is load-bearing.
  3. [Section 3.4, Theorem 3.23, Eqs. (3.19)-(3.20)] The existence proof relies on uniform-in-epsilon estimates that are only sketched. In particular, (3.19) is concluded with 'we obtain the announced estimate' after a partial computation, and (3.20) is obtained 'following the proof of Lemmas 3.17, 3.20, by treating the terms depending on epsilon as a perturbation.' The later compactness argument requires the constants to be independent of both epsilon and eta and requires explicit control of the modulus omega_gamma. An expanded derivation with the precise error terms and dependencies should be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Definition 2.15] Definition 2.15 defines a monotone solution to (2.1), but the surrounding subsection concerns (2.10); the reference should be corrected.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 3.3] In the proof of Theorem 3.3 the text refers to 'Theorem 3.21' for local existence; this should be Theorem 3.3 or the appropriate numbered theorem. The same incorrect self-reference appears in the proof of Lemma 3.21.
  3. [Section 3.4, Remark 3.24] Remark 3.24 refers to 'Hypothesis 10' where the intended hypothesis is Hypothesis 6; please correct the cross-reference.
  4. [Section 4, Definition 4.5] Several notation slips appear in Section 4: 'pi_d m' and 'pi_-d m' are used inconsistently, and in (4.7) 'nabla_n log' should be 'nabla_x log'.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typos ('writen', 'Lischitz', 'reelsd', 'theorem 3.21') that should be corrected in a final revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the monotone-solution uniqueness proof is a direct viscosity-supersolution argument, and the only author-overlapping citation with structural weight (Lemma 3.8 from [31]) is an independent supporting result, not an input that is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The notion of L2-monotone solution is a definitional choice: Definition 2.9 (and Definition 4.5 with entropy penalization) postulates that the auxiliary function Z = <W(t,X,L(X))-V, X-Y> is a viscosity supersolution of the linearized equation. Uniqueness (Theorems 2.10, 2.16, 4.13) then follows by applying this defining property to two solutions and using joint monotonicity (Hypothesis 1) plus growth (Hypothesis 2); no quantity is fitted and no target conclusion is assumed in the definition. Existence (Theorems 3.23, 3.26, 4.14) proceeds by Hille-Yosida regularization of L2-monotone coefficients (Lemma 3.10), existence of Lipschitz solutions for regularized data (Theorem 3.3, via a fixed point argument), a priori FBSDE estimates (Lemmas 3.14, 3.17, 3.20, 3.22), and stability of monotone solutions (Theorems 2.12, 2.18, 4.7). The only author-overlapping citation with structural weight is [31, Lemma 5.3] imported as Lemma 3.8, a parameter-free representation result for Lipschitz solutions under common noise; it does not include the paper's target theorem and is independent support, so it does not create circularity. The paper explicitly admits (Section 4 and the concluding remark) that uniqueness with idiosyncratic noise is not treated in full generality: Theorem 4.13 requires one solution to lie in the closure of Lipschitz solutions (Definition 4.11). This is an honest limitation and a mismatch with the abstract's phrasing, but it is not a circular reduction of the claimed result to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; constants like α, L, a0, γ are assumptions on the data, not fitted values. No invented entities are introduced; the entropy penalization is a technical device, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The lifted coefficients F̃, G̃, W̃0 satisfy L2-monotonicity and growth Hypothesis 2.
    This is the core structural assumption for uniqueness and a priori estimates (Hypotheses 1 and 2).
  • standard math The probability space is rich enough to support all random variables and Brownian motions; H = L2(Ω,Rd) is a Hilbert space.
    Needed for the Hilbertian lifting throughout Sections 2 and 3.
  • standard math Stegall's Lemma applies to the functionals Zα,λ,ε on [0,T] × H or P2, yielding perturbed points of strict minimum.
    Used in uniqueness and stability proofs (Theorems 2.10, 2.12, 4.7, 4.13).
  • standard math Viscosity solution comparison and maximum principles for transport and second-order equations on H and P2 hold with the chosen test functions.
    The propagation-of-monotonicity arguments rely on comparison, e.g., Lemma 2.6 and Theorem 2.16.
  • ad hoc to paper Under entropy penalization, minima are attained at measures with finite Fisher information (Lemmas 4.2 and 4.8).
    This technical device is specific to the idiosyncratic noise treatment and underpins Definition 4.5 and Theorem 4.13.
  • standard math The Hille-Yosida regularization of monotone operators produces approximating functions with the stated Lipschitz and locality properties (Lemma 3.10).
    This is the key approximation device for existence in Section 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monotone solutions to mean field games master equation in the L2-monotone setting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XG7744NT

@misc{pith2026250510045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monotone solutions to mean field games master equation in the L2-monotone setting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XG7744NT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10045}
}
read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with extending the notion of monotone solution to the mean field game (MFG) master equation to situations in which the coefficients are displacement monotone, instead of the previously introduced notion in the flat monotone regime. To account for this new setting, we work directly on the equation satisfied by the controls of the MFG. Following previous works, we define an appropriate notion of solution under which uniqueness and stability results hold for solutions without any differentiability assumption with respect to probability measures. Thanks to those properties, we show the existence of a monotone solution to displacement monotone mean field games under local regularity assumptions on the coefficients and sufficiently strong monotonicity. Albeit they are not the focus of this article, results presented are also of interest for mean field games of control and general mean field forward backward systems. In order to account for this last setting, we use the notion of L2--monotonicity instead of displacement monotonicity, those two notions being equivalent in the particular case of MFG.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analysis on spaces of measures

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A synthesis monograph unifying vertical and horizontal differential calculus on spaces of measures, applied to well-posedness of monotone mean field game master equations and to viscosity solutions of mean field Hamil...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hidden monotonicity and canonical transformations for mea n field games and master equations

    Bansil, Mohit and Mészáros, Alpár R. Hidden monotonicity and canonical transformations for mea n field games and master equations . 2024. arXiv: 2403.05426 [math.AP]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    The Master equation in mean field theory

    Bensoussan, Alain, Frehse, Jens, and Yam, Sheung Chi Phi llip. “The Master equation in mean field theory”. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 103.6 (2015), pp. 1441–1474

    2015

  3. [3]

    Jeux à champ moyen et contrôle stochastiqu e dans l’espace de Wasserstein

    Bertucci, C. “Jeux à champ moyen et contrôle stochastiqu e dans l’espace de Wasserstein” (2023). url: https://www.college-de-france.fr

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Monotone solutions for mean field games mas ter equations: continuous state space and common noise

    Bertucci, C. “Monotone solutions for mean field games mas ter equations: continuous state space and common noise”. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 48.10-12 (2023), pp. 1245–1285. 48 REFERENCES

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    A two spaces extension of C auchy-Lipschitz theorem

    Bertucci, C. and Lions, P.-L. “A two spaces extension of C auchy-Lipschitz theorem”. Journal of Differential Equations 421 (2025), pp. 524–530

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Noise through on additionn al variable for mean field games master equation on finite state space

    Bertucci, C. and Meynard, C. “Noise through on additionn al variable for mean field games master equation on finite state space” (2024). arXiv: 2402.05635

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Monotone solutions for mean field ga mes master equations: finite state space and optimal stopping

    Bertucci, Charles. “Monotone solutions for mean field ga mes master equations: finite state space and optimal stopping”. en. Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques 8 (2021), pp. 1099–1132. doi: 10.5802/jep.167. url: https://jep.centre-mersenne.org/articles/10.5802/je p.167/

    work page doi:10.5802/jep.167 2021

  8. [8]

    On monotone solutions of mean field g ames master equations

    Bertucci, Charles. “On monotone solutions of mean field g ames master equations”. en. Séminaire Laurent Schwartz — EDP et applications (2021-2022). talk:14, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.5802/slsedp.153. url: https://proceedings.cen

    work page doi:10.5802/slsedp.153 2021

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Mean Field Game s Master Equations: From Discrete to Continuous State Space

    Bertucci, Charles and Cecchin, Alekos. “Mean Field Game s Master Equations: From Discrete to Continuous State Space”. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 56.2 (2024), pp. 2569–2610

    2024

  2. [10]

    On Lipschitz solutions of mean field games master equations

    Bertucci, Charles, Lasry, Jean-Michel, and Lions, Pie rre-Louis. “On Lipschitz solutions of mean field games master equations”. Journal of Functional Analysis 287.5 (2024), p. 110486

    2024

  3. [11]

    An approximation of the squared Wasserstein distance and an application to Hamilton-Jacobi equations

    Bertucci, Charles and Lions, Pierre Louis. An approximation of the squared Wasserstein distance and an application to Hamilton-Jacobi equations . 2024. arXiv: 2409.11793 [math.AP]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Weak Solutions for First Order Mean F ield Games with Local Coupling

    Cardaliaguet, P. “Weak Solutions for First Order Mean F ield Games with Local Coupling”. Analysis and Geometry in Control Theory and its Applications . 2015, pp. 111–158

    2015

  5. [13]

    The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games

    Cardaliaguet, P., Delarue, F., Lasry, J.-M., and Lions , P.-L. “The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games”. Princeton University Press (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Mean field forwar d-backward stochastic differential equations

    Carmona, René and Delarue, François. “Mean field forwar d-backward stochastic differential equations”. Elec- tronic Communications in Probability 18 (2013), pp. 1 –15

    2013

  7. [15]

    Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II

    Carmona, René and Delarue, François. Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II. Ed. by Springer. 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Weak solutions to the maste r equation of potential mean field games

    Cecchin, A. and Delarue, F. “Weak solutions to the maste r equation of potential mean field games” (2022). arXiv: 2204.04315

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On smooth approxim ations in the Wasserstein space

    Cosso, Andrea and Martini, Mattia. “On smooth approxim ations in the Wasserstein space”. Electronic Com- munications in Probability 28.none (2023), pp. 1 –11

    2023

  10. [18]

    user’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations

    Crandall, M., Ishii, H., and Lions, P.-L. “user’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 27.1 (1992), pp. 1–67

    1992

  11. [19]

    A comparison principle for se milinear Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations in the Wasserstein space

    Daudin, S. and Seeger, B. “A comparison principle for se milinear Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations in the Wasserstein space”. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 63.4 (2024), p. 106

    2024

  12. [20]

    Fatou’s Lemma in Its Classical Form and Lebesgue’s Convergence Theorems for Varying Measures with Applicatio ns to Markov Decision Processes

    Feinberg, E. A., Kasyanov, P. O., and Liang, Y. “Fatou’s Lemma in Its Classical Form and Lebesgue’s Convergence Theorems for Varying Measures with Applicatio ns to Markov Decision Processes”. Theory of Probability & Its Applications 65.2 (2020), pp. 270–291

    2020

  13. [21]

    Fleming, W. H. and Soner, H. M. Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions . Vol. 25. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Springer, 2006

    2006

  14. [22]

    Mean Fi eld Games Master Equations with Non-separable Hamiltonians and Displacement Monotonicity

    Gangbo, W., Mészáros, A., Mou, C., and Zhang, J. “Mean Fi eld Games Master Equations with Non-separable Hamiltonians and Displacement Monotonicity”. Annals of Probability 50 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    and Mandrekar, V

    Gawarecki, L. and Mandrekar, V. Stochastic Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensions: w ith Applications to Stochastic Partial Differential Equations . Probability and Its Applications. Springer, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Krylov, N. V. Lectures on Parabolic and elliptic equations in holder spac es. Ed. by society, American mathe- matical. 1996

    1996

  17. [25]

    Mean fiel d games

    Lasry, Jean-Michel and Lions, Pierre-Louis. “Mean fiel d games”. Japanese Journal of Mathematics 2.3 (2007), pp. 229–260

    2007

  18. [26]

    Lectures at Collège de France

    Lions, P.-L. “Lectures at Collège de France” (2007-201 1). url: http://www.college-de-france.fr

    2007

  19. [27]

    “Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear s econd-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions

    Lions, P.-L. “Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear s econd-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions. III. Uniqueness of viscosity soluti ons for general second-order equations”. Journal of Functional Analysis 86.1 (1989), pp. 1–18

    1989

  20. [28]

    Transport Equations and Flows with One-Sided Lipschitz Velocity Fields

    Lions, Pierre-Louis and Seeger, Benjamin. “Transport Equations and Flows with One-Sided Lipschitz Velocity Fields”. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248 (2024), p. 86

    2024

  21. [29]

    “Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear se cond-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions

    Lions, P.L. “Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear se cond-order equations and optimal stochastic control in infinite dimensions. III. Uniqueness of viscosity solution s for general second-order equations”. Journal of Functional Analysis 86.1 (1989), pp. 1–18

    1989

  22. [30]

    Bansil, Alpár R

    M. Bansil, Alpár R. Mészáros and Mou, C. Global Well-Posedness of Displacement Monotone Degenerat e Mean Field Games Master Equations . 2023. arXiv: 2308.16167

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A study of common noise in mean field games

    Meynard, Charles and Bertucci, Charles. A study of common noise in mean field games . 2024. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2 REFERENCES 49

    2024

  24. [32]

    Wellposedness of S econd Order Master Equations for Mean Field Games with Nonsmooth Data

    Mou, Chenchen and Zhang, Jianfeng. “Wellposedness of S econd Order Master Equations for Mean Field Games with Nonsmooth Data”. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Mean Field Games Systems under Displacement Monotonicity

    Mészáros, A. and Mou, C. “Mean Field Games Systems under Displacement Monotonicity”. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 56.1 (2024), pp. 529–553

    2024

  26. [34]

    Fully Coupled Forward-Backward Sto chastic Differential Equations and Applications to Optimal Control

    Peng, S. and Wu, Z. “Fully Coupled Forward-Backward Sto chastic Differential Equations and Applications to Optimal Control”. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 37.3 (1999), pp. 825–843

    1999

  27. [35]

    Weak Solutions to Fokker–Planck E quations and Mean Field Games

    Porretta, Alessio. “Weak Solutions to Fokker–Planck E quations and Mean Field Games”. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 216.1 (2015), pp. 1–62

    2015

  28. [36]

    Existence and uniqueness to the Cauch y problem for linear and semilinear parabolic equations with local conditions

    Rubio, Gerardo. “Existence and uniqueness to the Cauch y problem for linear and semilinear parabolic equations with local conditions”. ESAIM: Proc. 31 (2011), pp. 73–100. doi: 10.1051/proc/2011005. url: https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/2011005

    2011

  29. [37]

    Optimization of functions on certa in subsets of Banach spaces

    Stegall, Charles. “Optimization of functions on certa in subsets of Banach spaces”. Mathematische Annalen 236.2 (1978), pp. 171–176

    1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.