Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Analysis on spaces of measures

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves mean field control value functions are unique viscosity solutions of Wasserstein HJB equations, and monotone master equations are well-posed.

desk verdict A useful pedagogical synthesis of the measure calculus, but Definition 8.2's monotone regime has a sign error that undercuts Part II's hypotheses as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19939 v1 pith:JW5JMHJ5 submitted 2026-07-22 math.AP math.OCmath.PR

Charles Bertucci (CEREMADE) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.OCmath.PR MSC 35D4046G0549L2549N8049Q22
keywords meanfieldgamesmasterequationHamilton-Jacobi-BellmanequationsviscositysolutionsWassersteinspaceshorizontalderivativeverticalmonotone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mean field models describe large populations of interacting agents through equations on spaces of probability measures. This book argues that two different notions of derivative—vertical (add or remove mass) and horizontal (move existing mass)—are the right primitive tools for such equations, and uses them to prove two well-posedness results: monotone mean field game master equations have unique, stable solutions, and the value function of a deterministic mean field optimal control problem is the unique viscosity solution of the associated first-order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation on the Wasserstein space. If correct, these theorems give PDE foundations for dynamic programming and equilibrium analysis in mean field problems.

What carries the argument

The paper's two workhorses are the vertical (flat) derivative—a Fréchet derivative in the total-variation norm, needing only a measurable base space—and the horizontal derivative—an expansion along couplings with a density in L^{p'}_μ, needing differential structure on the base space. The load-bearing technical object for the HJB part is the randomized horizontal super-differential (Definition 5.19): an element is a map ψ: O → P(R^d) rather than a deterministic vector field, and the extra randomness is the key to making the comparison principle close. For the master-equation part, the load-bearing concept is the monotone regime (Definition 8.2): monotonicity of A, B, G is what prevents singu

What would settle it

Construct a mean field game master equation satisfying the book's monotone hypotheses (A, B, G monotone) that admits two distinct solutions; or, for the HJB part, exhibit a deterministic mean field optimal control problem satisfying the stated hypotheses whose value function fails the definition of a viscosity subsolution or supersolution at some test point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the vertical/horizontal dichotomy in Part I is sufficient to build a weak (viscosity / sub-super-differential) calculus on spaces of measures that makes the two flagship PDEs well-posed. Part II proves that, under a monotone regime on the data (the operators A, B, G entering the forward-backward system are monotone), solutions to the mean field game master equation are unique and stable; existence is discussed but the monotone regime is the boundary of the method, and the author states it as open whether other regimes yield uniqueness. Part III proves that the value function of a finite-horizon deterministic mean field optimal control problem is the unique viscosity

Load-bearing premise

The master-equation uniqueness and stability theorems require the monotone regime—the operators A, B, G must be monotone; the author flags it as an open question whether uniqueness holds without it, so this regime is the load-bearing premise of Part II.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mean field optimal control problems that fit the book's assumptions have a well-defined value: the HJB equation on the Wasserstein space admits exactly one viscosity solution.
  • Monotone mean field game master equations are stable: small changes in data produce small changes in the solution, which supports approximation by finite-agent simulations.
  • The vertical/horizontal split gives a usable rule of thumb: use vertical tools for master equations and horizontal tools for control/HJB equations, since the two classes really need different geometries.
  • Perturbed optimization (Stegall-type results for measures) provides exposed minima that turn comparison proofs into a routine optimization argument rather than ad hoc PDE estimates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the randomized horizontal super-differential is the correct notion, one might test it numerically: compute a finite-N control problem's value function, and check whether its limiting sub-gradients appear as laws rather than deterministic functions near singularities.
  • The Burgers analogy in the book suggests that non-monotone master equations may genuinely require shock-like (entropic) selections rather than classical solutions; this would make the monotone regime a fundamental boundary, not just a technical assumption.
  • The monotone-regime open question could be attacked with the forward-backward system directly: if one can construct a non-monotone system with multiple solutions, that would confirm the boundary; if not, the boundary may be shiftable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a research monograph, based on the author's lecture notes, that develops a systematic calculus for functions defined on spaces of probability measures and then applies it to two classes of PDEs: mean field game (MFG) master equations and first-order mean field Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations. Part I introduces the vertical (flat) and horizontal derivatives, several notions of convexity and monotonicity, horizontal sub/super-differentials, optimality conditions, and perturbed optimization. Part II defines a monotone regime for master equations and announces uniqueness and stability results for monotone solutions. Part III derives HJB equations for mean field optimal control problems and announces a viscosity solution theory on Wasserstein spaces, with the value function characterized as the unique viscosity solution. The central claims, if correct, would provide a unifying toolkit for a substantial body of recent PDE literature on spaces of measures.

Significance. The monograph's Part I is a valuable synthesis: it carefully separates vertical and horizontal differential calculi, proves structural results such as uniqueness of the H-derivative (Prop. 4.3), H-differentiability of the squared Wasserstein distance (Prop. 4.30), and the collapse of horizontal sub/super-differentials for H-differentiable functions (Prop. 5.27), and it gives honest deferrals to the literature where proofs are omitted. The announced applications to master equations and mean field HJB equations are important and, if the full proofs are correct, would make the book a useful reference. However, the precise boundary of the method in Part II is stated through the monotone regime of Definition 8.2, and that definition as written is inconsistent with the book's own motivating example. Because the later uniqueness and stability theorems are stated under this hypothesis, this is a load-bearing issue that must be resolved before the Part II claims can be accepted as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§8.4.2, Definition 8.2] The stated monotone-regime inequality has the wrong sign for the Burgers example that motivates it. Definition 8.2 requires, for all (x1,y1),(x2,y2) in E×E', that <A[x1,y1]-A[x2,y2], y1-y2> + <B[x1,y1]-B[x2,y2], x1-x2> ≥ 0. For the Burgers system of §8.4.1 one has A[y,v]=-v and B=0, so the left side equals -(v1-v2)^2 when x1=x2, which is ≤ 0, not ≥ 0. Thus the motivating example does not satisfy the stated monotone regime. The uniqueness computation in §8.4.1, namely -(u0(y0^1)-u0(y0^2))(y0^1-y0^2) = ∫_0^T (v1-v2)^2 dt ≥ 0, is consistent with the opposite sign. Since Definition 8.2 is the advertised boundary of the method and the theorems of Sections 9.4–9.5 are stated under it, this is not a typo-level issue: either the inequality must be reversed, or the quantification must be restricted to the invariant set y = y_T-(T-t)v, and all subsequent uses of the monotone regime must be recheck
  2. [§8.4.2 and Part II] The text states that the monotone regime is a 'simple generalization' of the scalar non-decreasing condition, but no precise statement is given of how Definition 8.2 implies uniqueness of the forward-backward system (8.1)-(8.2) in the stated generality. In particular, the derivation of the Burgers uniqueness uses the terminal condition y_T^1=y_T^2, which relates y0^1-y0^2 to -(T)(v0^1-v0^2); this relation is not available for arbitrary pairs (x1,y1),(x2,y2) in E×E'. The final version should either prove the uniqueness theorem directly from the corrected definition or state explicitly the additional structural assumptions under which Definition 8.2 is the right hypothesis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§8.4.2, Definition 8.2] The pairing subscripts are confusing: the first pairing should be with respect to (E,E') and the second with respect to (E',E), not 'E×E'' and 'E'×E' as written. Please clarify the notation.
  2. [§8.4.1] In the uniqueness computation, the step 'because u0 is non-decreasing' implicitly uses y0^1-y0^2 = -T(v0^1-v0^2), which follows from y_T^1=y_T^2. This identity should be stated explicitly.
  3. [§6.2.2, after Definition 6.7] The quantity d_{\mu,p'} is declared to be a metric in Proposition 6.6, but the proof is left as an exercise. Since this metric is used in the definition of C^{1,\alpha} regularity of the horizontal differential, a short proof or reference would improve readability.
  4. [§5.4.2, Proposition 5.23] The notation 'x \mapsto \delta_{\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} z \psi_x(dz)}' is ambiguous. It should be stated explicitly that this denotes the deterministic coupling with barycentric projection of \psi_x, and that the result is cited from Gangbo--Tudorascu.
  5. [General (Parts I–III)] Several key proofs are deferred to external references (e.g., Theorem 4.18, Proposition 5.23) or left as exercises. Given the stated goal of accessibility, the author should mark these deferrals more prominently and, where possible, include the proofs or precise statements of the external results used in Parts II and III.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained, with self-citations only as provenance. A sign inconsistency in Definition 8.2 is flagged as a correctness concern, not a circular step.

full rationale

The book's central claims—uniqueness and stability of monotone master-equation solutions and the characterization of mean-field control value functions as unique viscosity solutions—are derived in the text rather than imported through a self-citation chain. Part I develops the calculus tools explicitly; Part II proves the Burgers uniqueness computation and states the monotone regime as a formal definition; Part III is announced as proving comparison and existence. The perturbed-optimization results used later (Propositions 7.5 and 7.7) are stated with proofs in Section 7, even though they are attributed to the author's papers [19] and [29]; those citations are provenance, not the load-bearing argument. The exposition is benchmarked against extensive external references (Ambrosio–Gigli–Savaré [10], Villani [119], Carmona–Delarue [43], Cardaliaguet–Delarue–Lasry–Lions [39], Gangbo–Tudorascu [80], etc.), and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. One non-circular correctness issue should be noted: Definition 8.2's monotonicity inequality appears to have the opposite sign relative to the Burgers example in Section 8.4.1. For that system A[y,v] = -v, B=0, so the Definition 8.2 condition becomes -|v1-v2|^2 >= 0, which is impossible for distinct v1,v2. The paper's own uniqueness computation in Section 8.4.1 derives -(u0(y0^1)-u0(y0^2))(y0^1-y0^2) = integral |v1-v2|^2 >= 0, which is consistent with the opposite sign. This is an internal inconsistency in the stated hypothesis, but it does not make the derivation circular: the stated theorems are conditional on the definition as written. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The book imports essentially all analytical weight from prior literature; its own additions are definitional organization, a few refinements (Theorem 4.6), and the engineered super-differential of Definition 5.19. No fitted parameters, no invented entities. The load-bearing assumptions are the geometric setting of O, the standard-probability-space lift, the monotone regime for master equations, and coercivity for perturbed optimization — all stated in the text at the quoted locations.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption O is the closure of a smooth convex domain of R^d (bounded or not) or the flat torus T^d for all horizontal calculus and for Parts II-III
    Stated in Section 4.1 ('O is the closure of a smooth convex domain of R^d') and Section 5.5 for the torus; the manifold case is only sketched in Section 4.8. The horizontal derivative, coupling convexity, super-differentials and the PDE results all live in this geometry; non-convex or non-smooth base spaces are excluded.
  • domain assumption Standard probability spaces (Polish, atomless) permit the lifting method (Theorems 1.9-1.10)
    Section 1.5. Proposition 4.5, Theorem 4.6, Proposition 5.21 and the Stegall-type perturbed optimization of Section 7.2.2 all pass through the lift; without atomless standard spaces the random-variable translations of the calculus fail.
  • domain assumption The monotone regime (Definition 8.2): G monotone, (A,B) monotone in the sense of E x E' duality
    Section 8.4.2. All Part II uniqueness/stability results are proved in this regime; the author states it is an open question whether other regimes give uniqueness of the forward-backward system, and notes that on the Burgers prototype the monotone regime is necessary for global regular solutions.
  • domain assumption Coercivity and lower semi-continuity of objectives in perturbed optimization (Proposition 7.7; Corollary 7.8; Proposition 7.9)
    Section 7.2.2. The double-lift Stegall argument requires U/(M_p)^{1/p} → infinity along M_p → infinity; value functions of the mean field control problems must satisfy compatible growth for the viscosity comparison machinery to yield strongly exposed minima.
  • ad hoc to paper The randomized horizontal super-differential (Definition 5.19) is the correct notion for the Part III comparison principle
    Section 5.4.2 constructs the definition explicitly so as 'not to miss essential elements' of super-differentials, i.e., to make the later viscosity theory work. Its adequacy is evidenced only by the results it enables in Part III; prior literature used simpler (deterministic) definitions, so this is a design choice the book must earn.
  • standard math Standard background: Stone-Weierstrass, Prokhorov's theorem, disintegration, gluing lemma, Kantorovich duality, Arzela-Ascoli, Hahn-Banach, Stegall's lemma, Ambrosio's superposition principle
    Invoked throughout Part I with citations ([10], [34], [36], [64], [111], [117]); these are unproved background the central claims rest on, standard in the measure-theory/optimal-transport literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analysis on spaces of measures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JW5JMHJ5

@misc{pith2026260719939,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analysis on spaces of measures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JW5JMHJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19939}
}
read the original abstract

This work presents analytical tools for studying functions defined on spaces of measures, together with two applications: mean field game master equations and first order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations on the set of probability measures. The first part introduces several notions of differentiability for such functions - vertical (or flat) and horizontal derivatives - as well as associated notions of convexity, monotonicity and sub-differentiability. The second part is concerned with master equations, for which uniqueness and stability of monotone solutions are established, and existence is discussed. The third part studies mean field optimal control problems and characterizes their value functions as the unique viscosity solutions of the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. This work is intended to be accessible to readers unfamiliar with spaces of measures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19939 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Typical variation of interest in this section: µt = µ+tν, for some µ, ν which are here finitely supported. 3.1 On the normed vector space of measures Consider a function U : M(O) 7→ R. We would like, quite classically, to say that U is (Fréchet) differentiable at µ0 ∈ M(O) if there exists a bounded linear operator A : M(O) 7→ R such that for any ν ∈ M(O), lim |ν|→0 U(µ0 + ν) − U(µ0) − A(ν) |ν| = 0. In the previous t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Typical variation of interest in this section: evolution of a measure µt := (Id + tϕ)#µ starting from an initial compactly supported density µ0. The vector field ϕ(x) induces both a translation and a dilation of the support. 4.2 Main definition The main notion is the following. Definition 4.1. A function U : Pp(O) 7→ R is horizontally or H-differentiable at µ ∈ Pp(O), if there exists ϕ ∈ L p ′ ((O, µ), R d ) and a m… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mastering Stochastic OLG Models in Continuous Time

    econ.GN 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper computes continuous-time OLG equilibria with aggregate risk by feeding a compressed wealth distribution into a neural net that outputs finite-difference grid values of the value function.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A class of short-term models for the oil industry that accounts for speculative oil storage.Finance and Stochas- tics, 26(3):631–669, 2022

    Yves Achdou, Charles Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, An- toine Rostand, and José A Scheinkman. A class of short-term models for the oil industry that accounts for speculative oil storage.Finance and Stochas- tics, 26(3):631–669, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Mean field games: Numerical methods.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(3):1136–1162, 2010

    Yves Achdou and Italo Capuzzo-Dolcetta. Mean field games: Numerical methods.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(3):1136–1162, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Income and wealth distribution in macroeconomics: A continuous-time approach.The review of economic studies, 89(1):45–86, 2022

    Yves Achdou, Jiequn Han, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Benjamin Moll. Income and wealth distribution in macroeconomics: A continuous-time approach.The review of economic studies, 89(1):45–86, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Simulating nu- merically the Krusell-Smith model with neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07698, 2022

    Yves Achdou, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre Louis Lions. Simulating nu- merically the Krusell-Smith model with neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07698, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A mean field model for the development of renewable capacities.Mathematics and Financial Economics, 17(4):695–719, 2023

    Clémence Alasseur, Matteo Basei, Charles Bertucci, and Alekos Cecchin. A mean field model for the development of renewable capacities.Mathematics and Financial Economics, 17(4):695–719, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Squared quadratic Wasserstein distance: optimal couplings and Lions differentiability.ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 24:703–717, 2020

    Aurélien Alfonsi and Benjamin Jourdain. Squared quadratic Wasserstein distance: optimal couplings and Lions differentiability.ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 24:703–717, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    PhD thesis, Paris 9, 1994

    Olivier Alvarez.Contributions à la théorie des solutions de viscosité des équations de Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman et applications à la finance. PhD thesis, Paris 9, 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    On a class of first order Hamilton–Jacobi equations in metric spaces.Journal of Differential Equations, 256(7):2194– 2245, 2014

    Luigi Ambrosio and Jin Feng. On a class of first order Hamilton–Jacobi equations in metric spaces.Journal of Differential Equations, 256(7):2194– 2245, 2014. 201

    2014

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Construction of the parallel transport in the Wasserstein space.Methods Appl

    Luigi Ambrosio and Nicola Gigli. Construction of the parallel transport in the Wasserstein space.Methods Appl. Anal., 15(1):1–30, 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Springer, 2005

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savaré.Gradient flows: in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures. Springer, 2005

    2005

  3. [11]

    On the structure of the geometric tangent cone to the Wasserstein space.Journal of Differential Equations, 442:113520, 2025

    Averil Aussedat. On the structure of the geometric tangent cone to the Wasserstein space.Journal of Differential Equations, 442:113520, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    Springer Science ; Business Media, 2008

    Martino Bardi and Italo Capuzzo-Dolcetta.Optimal control and viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. Springer Science ; Business Media, 2008

    2008

  5. [13]

    Discontinuous solutions of determinis- tic optimal stopping time problems.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 21(4):557–579, 1987

    Guy Barles and Benoit Perthame. Discontinuous solutions of determinis- tic optimal stopping time problems.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 21(4):557–579, 1987

    1987

  6. [14]

    Convergence of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations.Asymptotic analysis, 4(3):271–283, 1991

    Guy Barles and Panagiotis E Souganidis. Convergence of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations.Asymptotic analysis, 4(3):271–283, 1991

    1991

  7. [15]

    Comparison of viscosity solutions for a class of second-order PDEs on the Wasserstein space.Com- munications in Partial Differential Equations, 50(4):570–613, 2025

    Erhan Bayraktar, Ibrahim Ekren, and Xin Zhang. Comparison of viscosity solutions for a class of second-order PDEs on the Wasserstein space.Com- munications in Partial Differential Equations, 50(4):570–613, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Springer, 2013

    Alain Bensoussan, Jens Frehse, Phillip Yam, et al.Mean field games and mean field type control theory, volume 101. Springer, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    Monotone solutions for mean field games master equations: finite state space and optimal stopping.Journal de l’Ecole polytechnique– Mathématiques, 8:1099–1132, 2021

    Charles Bertucci. Monotone solutions for mean field games master equations: finite state space and optimal stopping.Journal de l’Ecole polytechnique– Mathématiques, 8:1099–1132, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    On monotone solutions of mean field games master equa- tions.Séminaire Laurent Schwartz–EDP et applications, pages 1–13, 2021

    Charles Bertucci. On monotone solutions of mean field games master equa- tions.Séminaire Laurent Schwartz–EDP et applications, pages 1–13, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Monotone solutions for mean field games master equations: continuous state space and common noise.Communications in Partial Dif- ferential Equations, 48(10-12):1245–1285, 2023

    Charles Bertucci. Monotone solutions for mean field games master equations: continuous state space and common noise.Communications in Partial Dif- ferential Equations, 48(10-12):1245–1285, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Stochastic optimal transport and Hamilton–Jacobi– Bellman equations on the set of probability measures.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, 42(6):1543–1600, 2024

    Charles Bertucci. Stochastic optimal transport and Hamilton–Jacobi– Bellman equations on the set of probability measures.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, 42(6):1543–1600, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    The tangent space to the Wasserstein space: parallel transport and other applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09763, 2025

    Charles Bertucci. The tangent space to the Wasserstein space: parallel transport and other applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09763, 2025. 202

    2025

  14. [22]

    A mean field game approach to bitcoin mining.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 15(3):960–987, 2024

    Charles Bertucci, Louis Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. A mean field game approach to bitcoin mining.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 15(3):960–987, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mean field games master equations: from discrete to continuous state space.SIAM journal on Mathematical Analysis, 56(2):2569–2610, 2024

    Charles Bertucci and Alekos Cecchin. Mean field games master equations: from discrete to continuous state space.SIAM journal on Mathematical Analysis, 56(2):2569–2610, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Some remarks on mean field games.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 44(3):205–227, 2019

    Charles Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. Some remarks on mean field games.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 44(3):205–227, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Master equa- tion for the finite state space planning problem.Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis, 242(1):327–342, 2021

    Charles Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. Master equa- tion for the finite state space planning problem.Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis, 242(1):327–342, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    On Lipschitz solutions of mean field games master equations.Journal of Functional Anal- ysis, 287(5):110486, 2024

    Charles Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. On Lipschitz solutions of mean field games master equations.Journal of Functional Anal- ysis, 287(5):110486, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    A singu- lar infinite-dimensional Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation arising from a storage problem.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 35(03):703–731, 2025

    Charles Bertucci, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. A singu- lar infinite-dimensional Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation arising from a storage problem.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 35(03):703–731, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    An approximation of the squared WassersteindistanceandanapplicationtoHamilton-Jacobiequations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11793, 2024

    Charles Bertucci and Pierre Louis Lions. An approximation of the squared WassersteindistanceandanapplicationtoHamilton-Jacobiequations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11793, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Non-linear Stegall’s lemma and general Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations on Wasserstein spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.31297, 2026

    Charles Bertucci and Pierre-Louis Lions. Non-linear Stegall’s lemma and general Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations on Wasserstein spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.31297, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Souganidis

    Charles Bertucci, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Panagiotis E. Souganidis. Optimal control of the dyson equation.to appear, 2026

    2026

  23. [31]

    Noise through an additional variable for mean field games master equation on finite state space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05635, 2024

    Charles Bertucci and Charles Meynard. Noise through an additional variable for mean field games master equation on finite state space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05635, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A study of common noise in mean field games.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12741, 2024

    Charles Bertucci and Charles Meynard. A study of common noise in mean field games.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12741, 2024. 203

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    On the doubling of variables technique in first order Hamilton-Jacobi equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03652, 2025

    Charles Bertucci and Giacomo Ceccherini Silberstein. On the doubling of variables technique in first order Hamilton-Jacobi equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03652, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Springer, 2007

    Vladimir Igorevich Bogachev.Measure theory. Springer, 2007

    2007

  27. [35]

    On dentability and the Bishop-Phelps property.Israel Jour- nal of Mathematics, 28(4):265–271, 1977

    Jean Bourgain. On dentability and the Bishop-Phelps property.Israel Jour- nal of Mathematics, 28(4):265–271, 1977

    1977

  28. [36]

    North-Holland Mathematics studies, 1973

    Haim Brezis.Opérateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contrac- tions dans les espaces de Hilbert, volume 5. North-Holland Mathematics studies, 1973

    1973

  29. [37]

    Notes on mean field games

    Pierre Cardaliaguet. Notes on mean field games. Technical report, Technical report, 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    Splitting meth- ods and short time existence for the master equations in mean field games

    Pierre Cardaliaguet, Marco Cirant, and Alessio Porretta. Splitting meth- ods and short time existence for the master equations in mean field games. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 25(5):1823–1918, 2022

    1918

  31. [39]

    Princeton University Press, 2019

    Pierre Cardaliaguet, François Delarue, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions.The Master Equation and the Convergence Problem in Mean Field Games:(AMS-201), volume 201. Princeton University Press, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    An introduction to mean field game theory

    Pierre Cardaliaguet and Alessio Porretta. An introduction to mean field game theory. InMean Field Games: Cetraro, Italy 2019, pages 1–158. Springer, 2021

    2019

  33. [41]

    Deterministicdifferentialgames under probability knowledge of initial condition.International Game Theory Review, 10(01):1–16, 2008

    PierreCardaliaguetandMarcQuincampoix. Deterministicdifferentialgames under probability knowledge of initial condition.International Game Theory Review, 10(01):1–16, 2008

    2008

  34. [42]

    Monotone solutions of the master equation for mean field games with idiosyncratic noise.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54(4):4198–4237, 2022

    Pierre Cardaliaguet and Panagiotis Souganidis. Monotone solutions of the master equation for mean field games with idiosyncratic noise.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54(4):4198–4237, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Probabilistic theory of mean field games: vol

    René Carmona and François Delarue. Probabilistic theory of mean field games: vol. i, mean field fbsdes, control, and games.Stochastic Analysis and Applications. Springer Verlag, 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    Probabilistic theory of mean field games: vol

    René Carmona and François Delarue. Probabilistic theory of mean field games: vol. ii, mean field games with common noise and master equations. Stochastic Analysis and Applications. Springer Verlag, 2017. 204

    2017

  37. [45]

    Dissipative probability vector fields and generation of evolution semigroups in Wasser- stein spaces.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 185(3):1087–1182, 2023

    Giulia Cavagnari, Giuseppe Savaré, and Giacomo Enrico Sodini. Dissipative probability vector fields and generation of evolution semigroups in Wasser- stein spaces.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 185(3):1087–1182, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Stochastic Eulerschemesanddissipativeevolutionsinthespaceofprobabilitymeasures

    Giulia Cavagnari, Giuseppe Savaré, and Giacomo Enrico Sodini. Stochastic Eulerschemesanddissipativeevolutionsinthespaceofprobabilitymeasures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20801, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    A la- grangian approach to totally dissipative evolutions in Wasserstein spaces

    Giulia Cavagnari, Giuseppe Savaré, and Giacomo Enrico Sodini. A la- grangian approach to totally dissipative evolutions in Wasserstein spaces. Journal of Differential Equations, 470:114395, 2026

    2026

  40. [48]

    Hamilton-Jacobi equations in spaces of mea- sures.PhD Thesis, 2026

    Giacomo Ceccherini Silberstein. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in spaces of mea- sures.PhD Thesis, 2026

    2026

  41. [49]

    American Mathematical Society, 2025

    Alekos Cecchin and François Delarue.Weak solutions to the master equation of potential mean field games, volume 315. American Mathematical Society, 2025

    2025

  42. [50]

    American Mathematical Society, 2022

    Jean-François Chassagneux, Dan Crisan, and François Delarue.A probabilis- tic approach to classical solutions of the master equation for large population equilibria, volume 280. American Mathematical Society, 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    A pseudo-Markov property for controlled diffusion processes.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 54(2):1017–1029, 2016

    Julien Claisse, Denis Talay, and Xiaolu Tan. A pseudo-Markov property for controlled diffusion processes.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 54(2):1017–1029, 2016

    2016

  44. [52]

    A system of non- linear functional differential equations arising in an equilibrium model of an economy with borrowing constraints

    Antoine Conze, Jean-Michel Lasry, and José Scheinkman. A system of non- linear functional differential equations arising in an equilibrium model of an economy with borrowing constraints. InAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, volume 8, pages 523–559, 1991

    1991

  45. [53]

    Master bellman equation in the wasserstein space: Uniqueness of viscosity solutions.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 377(01):31–83, 2024

    Andrea Cosso, Fausto Gozzi, Idris Kharroubi, Huyên Pham, and Mauro Rosestolato. Master bellman equation in the wasserstein space: Uniqueness of viscosity solutions.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 377(01):31–83, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations.Bulletin of the American mathematical society, 27(1):1–67, 1992

    Michael G Crandall, Hitoshi Ishii, and Pierre-Louis Lions. User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations.Bulletin of the American mathematical society, 27(1):1–67, 1992

    1992

  47. [55]

    Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations.Transactions of the American mathematical society, 277(1):1–42, 1983

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations.Transactions of the American mathematical society, 277(1):1–42, 1983. 205

    1983

  48. [56]

    Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions I

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions I. Uniqueness of viscosity solutions.Journal of functional analysis, 62(3):379–396, 1985

    1985

  49. [57]

    Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. II. Existence of viscosity solutions.Journal of Functional Analysis, 65(3):368–405, 1986

    1986

  50. [58]

    Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, III.Journal of functional analysis, 68(2):214–247, 1986

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, III.Journal of functional analysis, 68(2):214–247, 1986

    1986

  51. [59]

    Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. IV. Hamiltonians with unbounded linear terms.Journal of Functional Analysis, 90(2):237–283, 1990

    1990

  52. [60]

    Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. V. Unbounded linear terms and B- continuous solutions.Journal of functional analysis, 97(2):417–465, 1991

    1991

  53. [61]

    Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. VI. Non linearAand Tataru’s method refined.Evolution equations, Control theory and Biomathematics, Lecture notes in Pure and Applied mathematics, 155:51–89, 1994

    1994

  54. [62]

    Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions

    Michael G Crandall and Pierre-Louis Lions. Viscosity solutions of Hamilton- Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions. VII. The HJB equation is not always satisfied.Journal of Functional Analysis, 125(1):111–148, 1994

    1994

  55. [63]

    A comparison principle for semilinear Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations in the Wasserstein space.Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 63(4):106, 2024

    Samuel Daudin and Benjamin Seeger. A comparison principle for semilinear Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations in the Wasserstein space.Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 63(4):106, 2024

    2024

  56. [64]

    Hermann, 1975

    Claude Dellacherie and Paul-André Meyer.Probabilités et potentiel, Chapitres I à IV. Hermann, 1975

    1975

  57. [65]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    Emmanuele DiBenedetto.Degenerate parabolic equations. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  58. [66]

    Mathematical surveys and monograph, vol 15

    Joseph Diestel and John J Uhl.Vector measures. Mathematical surveys and monograph, vol 15. American Mathematical Society, 1977

    1977

  59. [67]

    Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces.Inventiones mathematicae, 98(3):511– 547, 1989

    Ronald J DiPerna and Pierre-Louis Lions. Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces.Inventiones mathematicae, 98(3):511– 547, 1989. 206

    1989

  60. [68]

    McKean–Vlasov op- timal control.The Annals of Probability, 50(2):791–833, 2022

    Mao Fabrice Djete, Dylan Possamaï, and Xiaolu Tan. McKean–Vlasov op- timal control.The Annals of Probability, 50(2):791–833, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018

    Richard M Dudley.Real analysis and probability. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018

    2018

  62. [70]

    SIAM, 1999

    Ivar Ekeland and Roger Temam.Convex analysis and variational problems. SIAM, 1999

    1999

  63. [71]

    Stochastic optimal con- trol in infinite dimension.Probability and Stochastic Modelling

    Giorgio Fabbri, Fausto Gozzi, and Andrzej Swiech. Stochastic optimal con- trol in infinite dimension.Probability and Stochastic Modelling. Springer, 2017

    2017

  64. [72]

    A comparison principle for Hamilton– Jacobi equations related to controlled gradient flows in infinite dimensions

    Jin Feng and Markos Katsoulakis. A comparison principle for Hamilton– Jacobi equations related to controlled gradient flows in infinite dimensions. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 192:275–310, 2009

    2009

  65. [73]

    A Hamilton–Jacobi PDE associated with hydrodynamic fluctuations from a nonlinear diffusion equa- tion.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 385(1):1–54, 2021

    Jin Feng, Toshio Mikami, and Johannes Zimmer. A Hamilton–Jacobi PDE associated with hydrodynamic fluctuations from a nonlinear diffusion equa- tion.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 385(1):1–54, 2021

    2021

  66. [74]

    Hamilton–Jacobi equations in space of mea- sures associated with a system of conservation laws.Journal de Mathéma- tiques pures et Appliquées, 97(4):318–390, 2012

    Jin Feng and Truyen Nguyen. Hamilton–Jacobi equations in space of mea- sures associated with a system of conservation laws.Journal de Mathéma- tiques pures et Appliquées, 97(4):318–390, 2012

    2012

  67. [75]

    Optimal control for a mixed flow of Hamil- tonian and gradient type in space of probability measures.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 365(8):3987–4039, 2013

    Jin Feng and Andrzej Świech. Optimal control for a mixed flow of Hamil- tonian and gradient type in space of probability measures.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 365(8):3987–4039, 2013

    2013

  68. [76]

    Springer, 2006

    Wendell H Fleming and H Mete Soner.Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions. Springer, 2006

    2006

  69. [77]

    The dynamics of inequality.Econometrica, 84(6):2071–2111, 2016

    Xavier Gabaix, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Benjamin Moll. The dynamics of inequality.Econometrica, 84(6):2071–2111, 2016

  70. [78]

    Global well-posedness of master equations for deterministic displacement convex potential mean field games

    Wilfrid Gangbo and Alpár R Mészáros. Global well-posedness of master equations for deterministic displacement convex potential mean field games. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 75(12):2685–2801, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    Mean field games master equations with nonseparable Hamiltonians and dis- placement monotonicity.The Annals of Probability, 50(6):2178–2217, 2022

    Wilfrid Gangbo, Alpár R Mészáros, Chenchen Mou, and Jianfeng Zhang. Mean field games master equations with nonseparable Hamiltonians and dis- placement monotonicity.The Annals of Probability, 50(6):2178–2217, 2022. 207

    2022

  72. [80]

    On differentiability in the Wasser- stein space and well-posedness for Hamilton–Jacobi equations.Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 125:119–174, 2019

    Wilfrid Gangbo and Adrian Tudorascu. On differentiability in the Wasser- stein space and well-posedness for Hamilton–Jacobi equations.Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 125:119–174, 2019

    2019

  73. [81]

    On the geometry of the space of probability measures inRn en- dowed with the quadratic optimal transport distance.Tesi, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2008

    Nicola Gigli. On the geometry of the space of probability measures inRn en- dowed with the quadratic optimal transport distance.Tesi, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2008

    2008

  74. [82]

    American Mathemat- ical Soc., 2012

    Nicola Gigli.Second Order Analysis on(P2(M),W 2). American Mathemat- ical Soc., 2012

    2012

  75. [83]

    Individual and mass behaviour in large population stochastic wireless power control problems: centralized and Nash equilibrium solutions

    Minyi Huang, Peter E Caines, and Roland P Malhamé. Individual and mass behaviour in large population stochastic wireless power control problems: centralized and Nash equilibrium solutions. In42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37475), ...

    2003

  76. [84]

    Minyi Huang, Peter E Caines, and Roland P Malhamé. Large-population cost-coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: individual-mass be- havior and decentralizedϵ-Nash equilibria.IEEE transactions on automatic control, 52(9):1560–1571, 2007

    2007

  77. [85]

    Large popula- tion stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle

    Minyi Huang, Roland P Malhamé, and Peter E Caines. Large popula- tion stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. 2006

    2006

  78. [86]

    Uniqueness of unbounded viscosity solution of hamilton-jacobi equations.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 33(5):721–748, 1984

    Hitoshi Ishii. Uniqueness of unbounded viscosity solution of hamilton-jacobi equations.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 33(5):721–748, 1984

    1984

  79. [87]

    The master equation for mean field game systems with fractional and nonlocal diffusions.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2025

    Espen Robstad Jakobsen and Artur Rutkowski. The master equation for mean field game systems with fractional and nonlocal diffusions.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2025

    2025

  80. [88]

    The maximum principle for viscosity solutions of fully non- linear second order partial differential equations.Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis, 101(1):1–27, 1988

    Robert Jensen. The maximum principle for viscosity solutions of fully non- linear second order partial differential equations.Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis, 101(1):1–27, 1988

    1988

  81. [89]

    Optimal con- trol of multiagent systems in the Wasserstein space.Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 59(2):58, 2020

    Chloé Jimenez, Antonio Marigonda, and Marc Quincampoix. Optimal con- trol of multiagent systems in the Wasserstein space.Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 59(2):58, 2020

    2020

  82. [90]

    Dynamical systems and Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations on the Wasserstein space and their L2 representations.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(5):5919–5966, 2023

    Chloé Jimenez, Antonio Marigonda, and Marc Quincampoix. Dynamical systems and Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations on the Wasserstein space and their L2 representations.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(5):5919–5966, 2023. 208

    2023

  83. [91]

    Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy.Journal of political Economy, 106(5):867–896, 1998

    Per Krusell and Anthony A Smith, Jr. Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy.Journal of political Economy, 106(5):867–896, 1998

    1998

  84. [92]

    A remark on regularization in hilbert spaces.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 55(3):257–266, 1986

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. A remark on regularization in hilbert spaces.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 55(3):257–266, 1986

    1986

  85. [93]

    Jeux à champ moyen

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. Jeux à champ moyen. i–le cas stationnaire.Comptes Rendus Mathématique, 343(9):619–625, 2006

    2006

  86. [94]

    Jeux à champ moyen

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. Jeux à champ moyen. ii–horizon fini et contrôle optimal.Comptes Rendus Mathématique, 343(10):679–684, 2006

    2006

  87. [95]

    Mean field games.Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 2(1):229–260, 2007

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. Mean field games.Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 2(1):229–260, 2007

    2007

  88. [96]

    Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2019

    Claude Le Bris and Pierre-Louis Lions.Parabolic equations with irregular data and related issues: Applications to stochastic differential equations, vol- ume 4. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2019

    2019

  89. [97]

    Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2006-2007

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2006-2007

    2006

  90. [98]

    Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2007-2008

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2007-2008

    2007

  91. [99]

    Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2008-2009

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2008-2009

    2008

  92. [100]

    Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2011-2012

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Cours au college de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2011-2012

    2011

  93. [101]

    Séminaire de mathématiques appliquées, collège de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2014-2015

    Pierre-Louis Lions. Séminaire de mathématiques appliquées, collège de france.www.college-de-france.fr, 2014-2015

    2014

  94. [102]

    Linear and nonlinear trans- port equations with coordinate-wise increasing velocity fields.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, 42(4):971–1036, 2024

    Pierre-Louis Lions and Benjamin Seeger. Linear and nonlinear trans- port equations with coordinate-wise increasing velocity fields.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, 42(4):971–1036, 2024

    2024

  95. [103]

    Mayer control problem with probabilistic uncertainty on initial positions.Journal of Differential Equa- tions, 264(5):3212–3252, 2018

    Antonio Marigonda and Marc Quincampoix. Mayer control problem with probabilistic uncertainty on initial positions.Journal of Differential Equa- tions, 264(5):3212–3252, 2018

    2018

  96. [104]

    A convexity principle for interacting gases.Advances in mathematics, 128(1):153–179, 1997

    Robert J McCann. A convexity principle for interacting gases.Advances in mathematics, 128(1):153–179, 1997. 209

    1997

  97. [105]

    Monotone solutions to mean field games master equation in the L2-monotone setting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10045, 2025

    Charles Meynard. Monotone solutions to mean field games master equation in the L2-monotone setting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10045, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Mean field game master equations with anti-monotonicity conditions.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(11):4469–4499, 2024

    Chenchen Mou and Jianfeng Zhang. Mean field game master equations with anti-monotonicity conditions.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(11):4469–4499, 2024

    2024

  99. [107]

    American Mathematical Society, 2024

    Chenchen Mou and Jianfeng Zhang.Wellposedness of second order master equations for mean field games with nonsmooth data, volume 302. American Mathematical Society, 2024

    2024

  100. [108]

    The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equation.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 26:101–174, 2001

    Felix Otto. The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equation.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 26:101–174, 2001

    2001

  101. [109]

    Backward stochastic differential equations and quasilinear parabolic partial differential equations

    Etienne Pardoux and Shige Peng. Backward stochastic differential equations and quasilinear parabolic partial differential equations. InStochastic Par- tial Differential Equations and Their Applications: Proceedings of IFIP WG 7/1 International Conference University of North Ca...

    1991

  102. [110]

    Some convexity criteria for differentiable functions on the 2- Wasserstein space.Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 56(5):1839– 1858, 2024

    Guy Parker. Some convexity criteria for differentiable functions on the 2- Wasserstein space.Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 56(5):1839– 1858, 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    Springer, 1988

    Robert R Phelps.Convex functions, monotone operators and differentiabil- ity, volume 1364. Springer, 1988

    1988

  104. [112]

    Totallyconvexfunctions,L 2-Optimal transport for laws of random measures, and solution to the Monge problem

    AlessandroPinziandGiuseppeSavaré. Totallyconvexfunctions,L 2-Optimal transport for laws of random measures, and solution to the Monge problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01768, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Weak solutions to Fokker–Planck equations and mean field games.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 216(1):1–62, 2015

    Alessio Porretta. Weak solutions to Fokker–Planck equations and mean field games.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 216(1):1–62, 2015

    2015

  106. [114]

    Optimal transport for applied mathematicians

    Filippo Santambrogio. Optimal transport for applied mathematicians. Birkäuser, NY, 55(58-63):94, 2015

    2015

  107. [115]

    Borrowing constraints and aggre- gate economic activity.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 23–45, 1986

    Jose A Scheinkman and Laurence Weiss. Borrowing constraints and aggre- gate economic activity.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 23–45, 1986

    1986

  108. [116]

    ViscositysolutionsforMckean–Vlasovcontrol onatorus.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 62(2):903–923, 2024

    HMeteSonerandQinxinYan. ViscositysolutionsforMckean–Vlasovcontrol onatorus.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 62(2):903–923, 2024. 210

    2024

  109. [117]

    Optimization of functions on certain subsets of banach spaces.Mathematische Annalen, 236(2):171–176, 1978

    Charles Stegall. Optimization of functions on certain subsets of banach spaces.Mathematische Annalen, 236(2):171–176, 1978

    1978

  110. [118]

    Cambridge univer- sity press, 2010

    Daniel W Stroock.Probability theory: an analytic view. Cambridge univer- sity press, 2010

    2010

  111. [119]

    Springer, 2009

    Cédric Villani.Optimal transport: old and new, volume 338. Springer, 2009. CEREMADE, CNRS, UMR7534, UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE-PSL E-mail address:bertucci@ceremade.dauphine.fr 211

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.