Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Do LLMs Memorize Recommendation Datasets? A Preliminary Study on MovieLens-1M

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.10212 v1 pith:OFXXJHS3 submitted 2025-05-15 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords memorizationrecommendationllmsdatasetsdatasetmemorizedmodelmovielens-1m
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly central to recommendation scenarios due to their remarkable natural language understanding and generation capabilities. Although significant research has explored the use of LLMs for various recommendation tasks, little effort has been dedicated to verifying whether they have memorized public recommendation dataset as part of their training data. This is undesirable because memorization reduces the generalizability of research findings, as benchmarking on memorized datasets does not guarantee generalization to unseen datasets. Furthermore, memorization can amplify biases, for example, some popular items may be recommended more frequently than others. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs have memorized public recommendation datasets. Specifically, we examine two model families (GPT and Llama) across multiple sizes, focusing on one of the most widely used dataset in recommender systems: MovieLens-1M. First, we define dataset memorization as the extent to which item attributes, user profiles, and user-item interactions can be retrieved by prompting the LLMs. Second, we analyze the impact of memorization on recommendation performance. Lastly, we examine whether memorization varies across model families and model sizes. Our results reveal that all models exhibit some degree of memorization of MovieLens-1M, and that recommendation performance is related to the extent of memorization. We have made all the code publicly available at: https://github.com/sisinflab/LLM-MemoryInspector

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Biases in LLM-Generated Musical Taste Profiles for Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Users identify more with LLM-generated music taste profiles for some genres and user groups than others, and these biases differ across models.

  2. Architecture is All You Need: Improving LLM Recommenders by Dropping the Text

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2.2M-parameter Llama-style model using only item IDs beats a 7B-parameter text-based LLM recommender and SASRec on MovieLens-10M.

Pith tools