Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 142 references

An Eccentric Sub-Neptune Moving Into the Evaporation Desert

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper confirms TOI-5800 b as a 2.6-day sub-Neptune with an eccentricity of 0.39±0.07—high enough to rule out a circular orbit at >5σ—and argues it is caught in the act of tidally migrating into the Neptune desert.

desk verdict Solid confirmation, but the headline eccentricity isn't fully secure until a two-Keplerian fit is done. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10324 v2 pith:W5FU7ASS submitted 2025-05-15 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Sydney Jenkins , Andrew Vanderburg , Ritika Sethi , Sarah Millholland , Joseph E. Rodriguez , Luca Fossati , Andreas Krenn , Emily Pass
show 26 more authors
Alex Venner Paul Butler Hugh Osborn Aaron Householder Carl Ziegler Juliette Becker Perry Berlind Allyson Bieryla Christopher Broeg Michael L. Calkins Jeffrey D. Crane Tansu Daylan Julien de Wit Jason D. Eastman David Ehrenreich Gilbert A. Esquerdo Michael Fausnaugh Yadira Gaibor David W. Latham Monika Lendl Andrew W. Mayo Gaetano Scandariato Steve Shectman Stephanie Striegel Johanna Teske Thomas G. Wilson
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords sub-NeptuneNeptunedesertexoplanetmigrationtidalheatinghigh-eccentricityphotoevaporationradialvelocityJWSTatmosphericcharacterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

TOI-5800 b is a sub-Neptune planet, about 2.7 times Earth's radius and 10.8 times its mass, that orbits its star every 2.6 days. The paper confirms the planet with radial velocity data and finds it has an unexpectedly high eccentricity of 0.39, meaning its orbit is markedly non-circular despite being so close-in. The authors argue this planet is caught in the act of tidally migrating into the Neptune desert, the puzzling scarcity of Neptune-sized planets on orbits shorter than about 3 days. Because tidal forces should circularize such a short-period orbit within about a gigayear, the high eccentricity implies the planet either arrived recently or is being actively stirred, and the authors propose high-eccentricity migration as the mechanism. If correct, TOI-5800 b offers a rare live look at a planet entering the desert, and it ranks as a top target for atmospheric characterization with JWST.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is tidal circularization at the hands of the host star, quantified by the Goldreich & Soter (1966) timescale $t_c = \frac{4Q'_p}{63}\frac{M_P a^{13/2}}{(G M_\star^3)^{1/2} R_P^5}$, where $Q'_p$ is the reduced tidal quality factor. This formula converts the measured eccentricity into an expected circularization time of $\sim$1 Gyr (assuming $Q'_p=10^5$, a value taken from Neptune and Uranus), and that timescale is what lets the paper claim the planet is 'moving into the desert' rather than sitting there quietly. The second piece of machinery is a Laplace-Lagrange secular perturbation model augmented with a tidal damping term following Zhang et al. (2013); this model is used to show that a hypothetical outer companion cannot pump the eccentricity up to the observed value on long timescales, strengthening the recent-arrival interpretation.

What would settle it

Measure the transit times of TOI-5800 b over the next decade: under the paper's assumption of $Q'_p=10^5$, tidal decay should shrink the orbit at a rate that produces a cumulative transit-timing drift of about a third of a second after ten years (growing as $t^2$); if no such drift appears, a much larger $Q'_p$ would be required, and the planet would not need to have migrated inward within the last gigayear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that TOI-5800 b is a confirmed sub-Neptune on a $2.62788$ day orbit with a mass of $10.8^{+1.3}_{-1.4}\,M_\oplus$, a radius of $2.68^{+0.23}_{-0.20}\,R_\oplus$, a bulk density of $3.16^{+0.86}_{-0.73}\,\mathrm{g\,cm^{-3}}$, and—most notably—an eccentricity of $0.39\pm0.07$ that rules out a circular orbit at more than $5\sigma$ confidence. For a planet this close to its star, tides should have circularized the orbit on a timescale of roughly a gigayear, so the observed eccentricity is either a sign that the planet migrated inward within the last $\sim$1 Gyr or that something is continually stirring it. The authors show through secular dynamical models that a plausible outer companion cannot maintain such a high eccentricity over long timescales, leaving active high-eccentricity migration into the Neptune desert as the favored interpretation. They estimate the tidal luminosity at about 10% of the incident stellar power, which would inflate the planet's atmosphere and cap its H/He envelope mass fraction at $\lesssim0.033\%$; photoevaporation models then predict such an envelope would be lost within about 10 Myr, suggesting that if the planet has any atmosphere left to observe, it is probably rich in heavy volatiles rather than primordial hydrogen and helium.

Load-bearing premise

The story that TOI-5800 b just arrived at its close orbit assumes its interior dissipates tidal energy about as readily as Neptune's or Uranus's does; a much stiffer planet could hold its eccentric orbit for far longer without having migrated recently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • TOI-5800 b is a rare example of a sub-Neptune with eccentricity more than $5\sigma$ above zero inside the Neptune desert, making it direct evidence that high-eccentricity migration can deliver planets to short-period orbits.
  • The planet's tidal circularization time of about 1 Gyr means it must have arrived at its current orbit relatively recently unless an undetected companion is continuously exciting its eccentricity.
  • Tidal heating deposits about 10% as much power as the starlight the planet receives, which inflates any H/He atmosphere and limits the envelope mass fraction to $\lesssim0.033\%$, with photoevaporation then stripping such an envelope within about 10 Myr.
  • TOI-5800 b is ranked the top TESS candidate for both transmission and emission spectroscopy within its temperature and radius regime, so it is a priority target for JWST; its eccentricity also creates a 5.2-fold variation in incident flux between apastron and periastron, enabling tests of transient heating on a sub-Neptune.
  • The tentative quadratic radial-velocity trend hints at an outer companion, but no significant transit-timing variations are seen, so confirming or ruling out such a companion requires further observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If TOI-5800 b is indeed caught mid-migration, the population of such eccentric desert occupants should be rare in a way that depends on the tidal quality factor; measuring $Q'_p$ for this planet, for example via the rate of orbital decay, would calibrate the desert's evacuation timescale.
  • The paper's preference for a heavy-volatile atmosphere is testable: a JWST transmission spectrum that sees water, methane, or ammonia but little hydrogen or helium would support the idea that evaporated envelopes leave 'water worlds' behind, extending the desert's role from sculpting orbits to shaping compositions.
  • Because the paper's timescale arguments rest on $Q'_p=10^5$ taken from Neptune and Uranus, a larger $Q'_p$ would lengthen the circularization time and weaken the 'recent arrival' narrative; this could be settled observationally by detecting a small but measurable decrease in orbital period over years of monitoring.
  • The 5.2-fold flux variation between apastron and periastron means that any atmospheric characterization must account for changing irradiation; phase-resolved spectroscopy of TOI-5800 b could provide the first sub-Neptune analogue of the transient heating seen on eccentric hot Jupiters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the confirmation and characterization of TOI-5800 b, a sub-Neptune with radius 2.68 R⊕ and mass 10.8 M⊕ on a 2.63-day orbit around a K3V star, based on TESS, CHEOPS, and PFS radial-velocity data. The authors measure a high eccentricity of e=0.39±0.07, rule out circular orbits at >5σ, and find tentative evidence for an outer companion in the form of a significant quadratic RV trend. They argue that the high eccentricity implies ongoing tidal circularization on a ~1 Gyr timescale, so the planet is actively migrating into the Neptune desert, and they discuss implications for tidal heating, atmospheric escape, and JWST follow-up.

Significance. The paper is a thorough and careful planet-confirmation study: it combines independent photometry and RVs, uses two independent MCMC codes with consistent results, checks TTVs, obtains high-resolution imaging, and cross-checks stellar parameters. If the eccentricity and tidal-migration interpretation hold, TOI-5800 b is a rare example of an eccentric sub-Neptune inside the Neptune desert, directly relevant to high-eccentricity migration as a desert-forming mechanism. The target is also genuinely interesting for JWST. The central claim, however, rests on two assumptions—the robustness of e to the tentative outer companion and the assumed tidal quality factor—that deserve explicit scrutiny.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Table A2] The model labeled '2-planet model' is not a two-Keplerian fit: it is the single-planet model plus linear and quadratic RV trend terms (Table A2). Because the observed acceleration reversal suggests an outer companion with period of order twice the 149-day PFS baseline, the companion's signal could deviate significantly from a quadratic. The eccentricity e=0.39±0.07 is the load-bearing quantity for the tidal-migration claim, and both the 1p and 2p models omit the outer Keplerian. I ask the authors to either (i) perform a full two-Keplerian joint fit (including plausible period priors of order 150–600 days) and show the inner-planet eccentricity posterior, or (ii) run injection-recovery tests demonstrating that plausible outer-companion parameters do not shift e by more than the reported uncertainty.
  2. [§6.1, Eq. (1)] The circularization timescale t_c≈1 Gyr and the tidal luminosity in §6.3 both assume Q'_p=10^5, taken from Neptune and Uranus, with no uncertainty propagated. Since the claim that TOI-5800 b is 'moving into the desert' requires t_c to be shorter than the ~2.5 Gyr stellar age, an order-of-magnitude variation in Q'_p (10^4–10^6) changes t_c by the same factor and materially weakens or strengthens the recent-migration narrative. Please report t_c (and L_tide, f_env) versus Q'_p, and discuss how the interpretation changes for Q'_p=10^6.
  3. [§6.2.2] The conclusion that an outer companion 'cannot maintain' the observed eccentricity is based on a single representative companion (30 M⊕, 60 days) within the low-e, low-inclination Laplace-Lagrange framework, with tidal damping added as an imaginary diagonal term. The RV trend constraints in Figure A2 permit a much wider range of companion masses and periods, and the linear secular theory is not valid at e~0.4. I suggest either broadening the dynamical exploration (e.g., a grid of companion masses/periods/eccentricities, or N-body integrations with a full tidal model) or softening the claim to 'a companion with the specific parameters tested cannot maintain e=0.39.'
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table A2] The column label '2p Model' should be renamed to '1-planet + quadratic trend model' to avoid misleading readers into thinking a full two-Keplerian fit was performed.
  2. [§3.3] The activity-based age of 2.5 Gyr and the astroARIADNE isochrone age of 11.6 Gyr are formally inconsistent; a sentence reconciling these values or stating explicitly which age is adopted in §6 would improve the clarity.
  3. [§6.3] The sentence 'a direct fit to the simulation results does not converge' is unexplained; please describe the attempted fit and why convergence fails, since this motivates the use of the empirical relations.
  4. [§7.3] There is a typo: 'atmopsheric' should be 'atmospheric.'
  5. [§5.2] The phrase 'Gaia systematic RV' should read 'Gaia systemic RV.'
  6. [References] Egger et al. 2024a and Egger et al. 2024b appear to cite the same paper (A&A 688, A223); please verify that these references are distinct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured parameters come from independent photometric and RV data, and the tidal and evaporation calculations use external published models with stated assumptions.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular at any load-bearing step. TOI-5800 b's mass, radius, and eccentricity are measured from independent PFS radial velocities and TESS/CHEOPS photometry through a joint MCMC fit; the tidal, secular, and photoevaporation analyses do not feed back into that fit as fitted parameters. Equation (1) is a forward Goldreich & Soter timescale calculation using the measured M_P, R_P, and a together with an assumed Q'_p = 10^5 taken from Neptune and Uranus; Q'_p is not fitted to TOI-5800 b, and the resulting ~1 Gyr timescale is used to interpret, not to construct, the eccentricity measurement. The secular two-planet models and the PASTA mass-loss estimates are similarly forward applications of external published frameworks (Murray & Dermott 1999; Zhang et al. 2013; Bonfanti et al. 2021; Kubyshkina et al. 2018). The f_env <= 0.033% bound in Section 6.3 is an inversion of the Millholland (2019) empirical radius-inflation relation, and the paper explicitly cautions that 'These results should therefore be considered with caution'; this is an acknowledged model-dependence, not a circular reduction. Self-citations exist (Vanderburg software, Millholland relations, Limbach et al. methodology), but none is used as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole support of the central claim. The outer-companion quadratic trend is also explicitly left open ('we reserve judgment on the origin of the quadratic trend'), so the eccentricity robustness concern raised by the skeptic is a data-modeling risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central confirmation depends mainly on standard transit and RV models plus stellar parameters. The dynamical and atmospheric interpretation adds assumed tidal quality factors and published model grids. No new physical forces or particles are required; the tentative outer companion is an interpretation of the observed RV trend with a falsifiable prediction.

free parameters (3)
  • Planet tidal quality factor Q'_p (circularization and tidal luminosity) = 10^5 (assumed, from Neptune and Uranus values)
    Used in Eq. (1) to estimate t_c ~ 1 Gyr and in the tidal luminosity and secular damping rate. No measurement exists for TOI-5800 b, so the central migration timescale scales inversely with this assumed value.
  • Stellar tidal quality factor Q'_star (orbital evolution) = 10^8 (assumed; Figure 6 caption uses Q* = 8.0)
    Used together with the planet Q' in the fourth-order Runge-Kutta tidal evolution to predict final circularized semi-major axes; the paper also tests other values.
  • Planet tidal quality factor Q'_p (orbital evolution) = 10^5.5 (assumed; Figure 6 caption uses Qp = 5.5)
    One of the adopted values in the long-term evolution models; controls the final orbital separation and circularization timescale.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Equilibrium tide theory with constant Q and constant phase lag
    Eqs. (1) and (2) follow Goldreich & Soter (1966), Hut (1981), and Leconte et al. (2010); the resulting timescales and luminosities are order-of-magnitude estimates.
  • domain assumption Stellar parameters from SPC, astroARIADNE, and MIST isochrones
    The stellar density prior and limb darkening priors come from these models; values are cross-checked with EXOFASTv2.
  • domain assumption Activity-age and X-ray luminosity calibrations
    Uses Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008) for age 2.5 Gyr and Houdebine et al. (2017) for L_X ~ 1.9e28 erg/s; the paper notes 30-40% formal uncertainty plus systematics.
  • domain assumption Empirical radius-inflation relations from Millholland (2019)
    Used to translate tidal luminosity into radius inflation and set f_env < 0.033%; the direct simulation fit did not converge, as stated in Section 6.3.
  • domain assumption PASTA hydrodynamic escape grid
    Underlies mass-loss rates of 0.7-4.4e10 g/s; assumes a H/He envelope and zero albedo, with the paper noting steam atmospheres would escape more slowly.
  • domain assumption Laplace-Lagrange secular theory with tidal damping
    Used to argue a 30 M_Earth, 60-day companion cannot maintain e = 0.39; valid only for small eccentricities and inclinations, and only one companion mass and period is tested.
invented entities (1)
  • Tentative outer planetary companion independent evidence
    purpose: To explain the observed quadratic radial velocity trend in Section 5.2
    The paper does not confirm this companion and reserves judgment. It has a falsifiable handle: the model predicts a specific acceleration and mass-separation range shown in Figure A2, which future radial velocity or astrometric observations could confirm or refute.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Eccentric Sub-Neptune Moving Into the Evaporation Desert." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W5FU7ASS

@misc{pith2026250510324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Eccentric Sub-Neptune Moving Into the Evaporation Desert},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W5FU7ASS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10324}
}
abstract

Though missions such as Kepler, K2, and TESS have discovered $>$2,000 sub-Neptune and Neptunian planets, there is a dearth of such planets at close-in (P$\lesssim$3 days) orbits. This feature, called the Neptune desert or the evaporation desert, is believed to be primarily shaped by planetary migration and photoevaporation. However, this region is not completely devoid of planets--a small number of very hot Neptunes reside within the desert. These planets provide an opportunity to directly probe the effects of migration and photoevaporation. We present confirmation of TOI-5800 b, an eccentric sub-Neptune on a $\approx$2.6 day period that is likely actively undergoing tidal migration. We use radial velocity measurements from the Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph (PFS) to constrain TOI-5800 b's mass and eccentricity. We find that it has an unusually high eccentricity (0.39$\pm$0.07) for its short orbit. TOI-5800 is therefore currently experiencing high levels of tidal heating as it moves into the desert. Ranked as a top candidate for transmission and emission spectroscopy within its temperature and radius regime, TOI-5800 b is a prime target for atmospheric characterization with JWST. TOI-5800 b presents a unique opportunity to study the atmosphere of a planet undergoing tidal heating and to probe the composition of sub-Neptune planets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Archival imaging of TOI-5800. From left to right, images are from Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (Abell 1955), the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS, Chambers et al. 2016) survey in the 𝑦 band, the Pan-STARRS survey in the 𝑖 band, and co-added TESS images from Sector 54. In all images, we show the current position of TOI-5800 with a red cross. The photometric apertures for Sectors 54 a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Photometric data from TESS and CHEOPS (see §2.1 and 2.3), shown in gray. Binned data is shown in orange, best-fit models (see §4) are shown in dark purple, and 100 draws from the posterior distribution are shown in light purple. vations simultaneously, alongside a cubic bspline model of the roll angle with 9-degree spacing to remove rapid varia￾tions in flux with spacecraft orientation, and a transit model of the pl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Radial velocity data from PFS (see §2.1), shown in black. The best-fit model (see §4) is shown in dark purple, and 100 draws from the posterior distribution are shown in light purple. Left: Phase-folded data and model with quadratic component subtracted. Right: Quadratic fit. We find tentative evidence for a quadratic trend in the RV data, potential evidence of an outer planetary companion. coefficients of 0.65 and … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diagram of TOI-5800 system. The star is shown to scale with the planet’s orbit. possible consequences of tidal heating in §6.3 and summarize all constraints on the planet’s composition in §7.2. 5.4. Eccentricity of TOI-5800 b We find that TOI-5800 b has an unexpectedly…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass-radius diagram with known sub-Neptunes and super-Earths. We include planets from the NASA Exoplanet Archive (accessed April 3, 2025) that have masses constrained within 20%. Theoretical models for a variety of interior compositions (Zeng et al. 2016) and for a col…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Radius and semi-major axis of planets listed in the NASA Exoplanet Archive. The Neptune desert is demarked by the black dashed lines (Mazeh et al. 2016). We also include updated boundaries from Castro-González et al. (2024), denoted by the black dotted lines. TOI…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Eccentricity evolution of TOI-5800 b, assuming a hy￾pothetical outer companion (𝑀𝑝,2 = 30𝑀⊕, 𝑃2 = 60 days). We show evolution curves for different outer planet eccentricities using the secular perturbation with tidal evolution model. We find that, regardless of the out…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Eccentricity and semi-major axis in units of stellar radii for all confirmed planets between 1.9-4.0 R⊕ listed on the NASA Exoplanet Archive. TOI-5800 b 𝑒 and 𝑎/𝑅★ values are indicated by purple and orange lines, respectively. 1𝜎 uncertainties are indicated by th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = ...

  3. [3]

    Abell , G. O. 1955, , 67, 258, 10.1086/126815

    doi:10.1086/126815 1955

  4. [4]

    L., et al

    Agol , E., Dorn , C., Grimm , S. L., et al. 2021, , 2, 1, 10.3847/PSJ/abd022

    doi:10.3847/psj/abd022 2021

  5. [5]

    L., Chen , X., Ciardi , D., et al

    Akeson , R. L., Chen , X., Ciardi , D., et al. 2013, , 125, 989, 10.1086/672273

    doi:10.1086/672273 2013

  6. [6]

    2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765, 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    Allard , F., Homeier , D., & Freytag , B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765, 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    J., Lopez, T

    Armstrong, D. J., Lopez, T. A., Adibekyan, V., et al. 2020, Nature, 583, 39–42, 10.1038/s41586-020-2421-7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2421-7 2020

  8. [8]

    2021, , 647, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039452

    Attia , M., Bourrier , V., Eggenberger , P., et al. 2021, , 647, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039452

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039452 2021

Show all 142 references
  1. [9]

    N., Daylan , T., et al

    Badenas-Agusti , M., G \"u nther , M. N., Daylan , T., et al. 2020, , 160, 113, 10.3847/1538-3881/aba0b5

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    1992, , 99, 390, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90155-Z

    Banfield , D., & Murray , N. 1992, , 99, 390, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90155-Z

    1992 doi

  3. [11]

    2020, , 496, 1922, 10.1093/mnras/staa1522

    Belokurov , V., Penoyre , Z., Oh , S., et al. 2020, , 496, 1922, 10.1093/mnras/staa1522

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    E., Garc \' a Mu \ n oz , A., et al

    Ben-Jaffel , L., Ballester , G. E., Garc \' a Mu \ n oz , A., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 141, 10.1038/s41550-021-01505-x

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    2003, , 410, 527, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031213

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., & Lundstr \"o m , I. 2003, , 410, 527, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031213

    2003 doi

  6. [14]

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., & Oey , M. S. 2014, , 562, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 109, 10.1007/s10686-020-09679-4

    Benz , W., Broeg , C., Fortier , A., et al. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 109, 10.1007/s10686-020-09679-4

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    2011, , 335, 161, 10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x

    Bianchi , L., Herald , J., Efremova , B., et al. 2011, , 335, 161, 10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    Bonfanti , A., Fossati , L., Kubyshkina , D., & Cubillos , P. E. 2021, , 656, A157, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142010

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    2018 a , , 553, 477, 10.1038/nature24677

    Bourrier , V., Lovis , C., Beust , H., et al. 2018 a , , 553, 477, 10.1038/nature24677

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    2018 b , , 620, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833675

    Bourrier , V., Lecavelier des Etangs , A., Ehrenreich , D., et al. 2018 b , , 620, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833675

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    2023, , 669, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245004

    Bourrier , V., Attia , M., Mallonn , M., et al. 2023, , 669, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245004

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    A., & Morris , B

    Brandeker , A., Patel , J. A., & Morris , B. M. 2024, PIPE: Extracting PSF photometry from CHEOPS data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2404.002

    2024

  14. [22]

    A., Latham , D

    Buchhave , L. A., Latham , D. W., Johansen , A., et al. 2012, , 486, 375, 10.1038/nature11121

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    P., Marcy , G

    Butler , R. P., Marcy , G. W., Williams , E., et al. 1996, , 108, 500, 10.1086/133755

    1996 doi

  16. [24]

    Castelli , F., & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087

    2003 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    2024, , 689, A250, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450957

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez , A., Bourrier , V., Lillo-Box , J., et al. 2024, , 689, A250, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450957

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    C., Magnier , E

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    I., Jordan , A

    Chiang , E. I., Jordan , A. B., Millis , R. L., et al. 2003, , 126, 430, 10.1086/375207

    2003 doi

  20. [28]

    2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    2011, , 412, 1237, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17983.x

    Co s kuno g lu , B., Ak , S., Bilir , S., et al. 2011, , 412, 1237, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17983.x

    2011

  22. [30]

    Correia , A. C. M., Bourrier , V., & Delisle , J. B. 2020, , 635, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936967

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    D., Shectman , S

    Crane , J. D., Shectman , S. A., & Butler , R. P. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6269, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. I. S. McLean & M. Iye , 626931, 10.1117/12.672339

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    D., Shectman , S

    Crane , J. D., Shectman , S. A., Butler , R. P., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 773553, 10.1117...

    2010 doi

  25. [33]

    D., Shectman , S

    Crane , J. D., Shectman , S. A., Butler , R. P., Thompson , I. B., & Burley , G. S. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali , 70...

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    K., Knutson , H

    de Wit , J., Lewis , N. K., Knutson , H. A., et al. 2017, , 836, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/836/2/L17

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter , A. 2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    D., Rodriguez , J

    Eastman , J. D., Rodriguez , J. E., Agol , E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.09480, 10.48550/arXiv.1907.09480

    2019 doi arXiv

  29. [38]

    2024 b , , 688, A223, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450472

    ---. 2024 b , , 688, A223, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450472

    2024 doi

  30. [39]

    A., Kubyshkina , D., Alibert , Y., et al

    Egger , J. A., Kubyshkina , D., Alibert , Y., et al. 2025, , 696, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453325

    2025 doi

  31. [40]

    J., et al

    Ehrenreich , D., Bourrier , V., Wheatley , P. J., et al. 2015, , 522, 459, 10.1038/nature14501

    2015 doi

  32. [41]

    2022, , 666, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243731

    Esparza-Borges , E., Parviainen , H., Murgas , F., et al. 2022, , 666, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243731

    2022 doi

  33. [42]

    2008, PhD thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    F u r\'esz, G. 2008, PhD thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    2008

  34. [43]

    J., Petigura , E

    Fulton , B. J., Petigura , E. A., Blunt , S., & Sinukoff , E. 2018, , 130, 044504, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8

    2018 doi

  35. [44]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  36. [45]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    2018 doi

  37. [46]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    2023, , 672, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245766

    Garc \' a Mu \ n oz , A. 2023, , 672, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245766

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    J., Petigura , E

    Gilbert , G. J., Petigura , E. A., & Entrican , P. M. 2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 122, e2405295122, 10.1073/pnas.2405295122

    2025 doi

  40. [49]

    2023, , 948, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc9ae

    Goldberg , M., & Batygin , K. 2023, , 948, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc9ae

    2023 doi

  41. [50]

    1963, , 126, 257, 10.1093/mnras/126.3.257

    Goldreich , P. 1963, , 126, 257, 10.1093/mnras/126.3.257

    1963 doi

  42. [51]

    1966, , 5, 375, 10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0

    Goldreich , P., & Soter , S. 1966, , 5, 375, 10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0

    1966 doi

  43. [52]

    M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  45. [54]

    D., Katz , D., & G \'o mez , A

    Haywood , M., Di Matteo , P., Lehnert , M. D., Katz , D., & G \'o mez , A. 2013, , 560, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397

    2013 doi

  46. [55]

    2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    Henden , A., & Munari , U. 2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    2014

  47. [56]

    V., et al

    H g , E., Fabricius , C., Makarov , V. V., et al. 2000, , 355, L27

    2000

  48. [57]

    J., Kempton, E

    Hord, B. J., Kempton, E. M. R., Mikal-Evans, T., et al. 2023, Identification of the Top TESS Objects of Interest for Atmospheric Characterization of Transiting Exoplanets with JWST. 2308.09617

    2023 arXiv

  49. [58]

    R., Mullan , D

    Houdebine , E. R., Mullan , D. J., Bercu , B., Paletou , F., & Gebran , M. 2017, , 837, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5cad

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  51. [60]

    O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al

    Husser , T. O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al. 2013, , 553, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    2013 doi

  52. [61]

    1981, , 99, 126

    Hut , P. 1981, , 99, 126

    1981

  53. [62]

    M., Twicken , J

    Jenkins , J. M., Twicken , J. D., McCauliff , S., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, ed. G. Chiozzi & J. C. Guzman , 99133E, 10.1117/12.2233418

    2016 doi

  54. [63]

    S., D \' az , M

    Jenkins , J. S., D \' az , M. R., Kurtovic , N. T., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1148, 10.1038/s41550-020-1142-z

    2020 doi

  55. [64]

    Johnstone , C. P. 2020, , 890, 79, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6224

    2020 doi

  56. [65]

    M.-R., Bean, J

    Kempton, E. M.-R., Bean, J. L., Louie, D. R., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130, 114401, 10.1088/1538-3873/aadf6f

    2018 doi

  57. [66]

    A., Harris, H

    Kilic, M., Munn, J. A., Harris, H. C., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 162, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa62a5

    2017 doi

  58. [67]

    2022, , 515, 1228, 10.1093/mnras/stac1686

    Korol , V., Belokurov , V., & Toonen , S. 2022, , 515, 1228, 10.1093/mnras/stac1686

    2022 doi

  59. [68]

    2015, , 127, 1161, 10.1086/683602

    Kreidberg , L. 2015, , 127, 1161, 10.1086/683602

    2015 doi

  60. [69]

    V., et al

    Kubyshkina , D., Fossati , L., Erkaev , N. V., et al. 2018, , 619, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833737

    2018 doi

  61. [70]

    I., & Fossati , L

    Kubyshkina , D. I., & Fossati , L. 2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 74, 10.3847/2515-5172/abf498

    2021 doi

  62. [71]

    Kurucz , R. L. 1992, in The Stellar Populations of Galaxies, ed. B. Barbuy & A. Renzini , 149, 225

    1992

  63. [72]

    Kurucz , R. L. 1993, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Model Atmospheres (Kurucz, 1979) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VI/39. Originally published in: 1979ApJS...40....1K

    1993

  64. [73]

    2009, , 457, 562, 10.1038/nature07649

    Laughlin , G., Deming , D., Langton , J., et al. 2009, , 457, 562, 10.1038/nature07649

    2009 doi

  65. [74]

    2010, , 516, A64, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014337

    Leconte , J., Chabrier , G., Baraffe , I., & Levrard , B. 2010, , 516, A64, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014337

    2010 doi

  66. [75]

    K., Knutson , H

    Lewis , N. K., Knutson , H. A., Showman , A. P., et al. 2013, , 766, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/95

    2013 doi

  67. [76]

    D., et al

    Li , J., Tenenbaum , P., Twicken , J. D., et al. 2019, , 131, 024506, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf44d

    2019 doi

  68. [77]

    J., et al

    Lillo-Box, J., Gandolfi, D., Armstrong, D. J., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 669, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243879

    2023 doi

  69. [78]

    A., Vanderburg , A., Venner , A., et al

    Limbach , M. A., Vanderburg , A., Venner , A., et al. 2024, , 973, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad74ed

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    2018, Re-normalising the astrometric chi-square in Gaia DR2, GAIA-C3-TN-LU-LL-124-01

    Lindegren, L. 2018, Re-normalising the astrometric chi-square in Gaia DR2, GAIA-C3-TN-LU-LL-124-01. http://www.rssd.esa.int/doc_fetch.php?id=3757412

    2018

  71. [80]

    2012, , 761, 122, 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/122

    Lithwick , Y., Xie , J., & Wu , Y. 2012, , 761, 122, 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/122

    2012 doi

  72. [81]

    2024, Planet-Planet Scattering and ZLK Migration -- The Dynamical History of HAT-P-11

    Lu, T., An, Q., Li, G., et al. 2024, Planet-Planet Scattering and ZLK Migration -- The Dynamical History of HAT-P-11. 2405.19511

    2024 arXiv

  73. [82]

    2022, , 163, 101, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3d38

    Lubin , J., Van Zandt , J., Holcomb , R., et al. 2022, , 163, 101, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3d38

    2022 doi

  74. [83]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0129, 10.1038/s41550-017-0129

    Luger , R., Sestovic , M., Kruse , E., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0129, 10.1038/s41550-017-0129

    2017 doi

  75. [84]

    S., Kjeldsen , H., Albrecht , S., et al

    Lundkvist , M. S., Kjeldsen , H., Albrecht , S., et al. 2016, Nature Communications, 7, 11201, 10.1038/ncomms11201

    2016 doi

  76. [85]

    G., Polania Vivas , M

    MacDonald , M. G., Polania Vivas , M. S., D'Angiolillo , S., Fernandez , A. N., & Quinn , T. 2023, , 166, 94, 10.3847/1538-3881/ace69d

    2023 doi

  77. [86]

    2016, , 824, L22, 10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L22

    Malhotra , R., Volk , K., & Wang , X. 2016, , 824, L22, 10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L22

    2016 doi

  78. [87]

    E., & Hillenbrand , L

    Mamajek , E. E., & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2008, , 687, 1264, 10.1086/591785

    2008 doi

  79. [88]

    W., Vanderburg , A., Latham , D

    Mayo , A. W., Vanderburg , A., Latham , D. W., et al. 2018, , 155, 136, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaadff

    2018 doi

  80. [89]

    2016, , 589, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201528065

    Mazeh , T., Holczer , T., & Faigler , S. 2016, , 589, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201528065

    2016 doi

  81. [90]

    2019, , 886, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3f

    Millholland , S. 2019, , 886, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3f

    2019 doi

  82. [91]

    2020, , 897, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab959c

    Millholland , S., Petigura , E., & Batygin , K. 2020, , 897, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab959c

    2020 doi

  83. [92]

    M., Fabrycky , D

    Mills , S. M., Fabrycky , D. C., Migaszewski , C., et al. 2016, , 533, 509, 10.1038/nature17445

    2016 doi

  84. [93]

    H., Leon , J

    Mori , M., Livingston , J. H., Leon , J. d., et al. 2022, , 163, 298, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6bf8

    2022 doi

  85. [94]

    M., Heng , K., Brandeker , A., Swan , A., & Lendl , M

    Morris , B. M., Heng , K., Brandeker , A., Swan , A., & Lendl , M. 2021, , 651, L12, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140913

    2021 doi

  86. [95]

    L., Twicken , J

    Morris , R. L., Twicken , J. D., Smith , J. C., et al. 2020, Kepler Data Processing Handbook: Photometric Analysis , Kepler Science Document KSCI-19081-003

    2020

  87. [96]

    2024, , 686, A296, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348690

    M \"u ller , S., Baron , J., Helled , R., Bouchy , F., & Parc , L. 2024, , 686, A296, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348690

    2024 doi

  88. [97]

    2021, , 653, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140718

    Murgas , F., Astudillo-Defru , N., Bonfils , X., et al. 2021, , 653, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140718

    2021 doi

  89. [98]

    D., & Dermott , S

    Murray , C. D., & Dermott , S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge University Press), 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    1999 doi

  90. [99]

    X., Burt , J

    Nabbie , E., Huang , C. X., Burt , J. A., et al. 2024, , 168, 132, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad60be

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    2023, , 669, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244120

    Orell-Miquel , J., Nowak , G., Murgas , F., et al. 2023, , 669, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244120

    2023 doi

  92. [101]

    E., & Lai , D

    Owen , J. E., & Lai , D. 2018, , 479, 5012, 10.1093/mnras/sty1760

    2018 doi

  93. [102]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3822–3827, 10.1093/mnras/stv1857

    Parviainen, H., & Aigrain, S. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3822–3827, 10.1093/mnras/stv1857

    2015 doi

  94. [103]

    2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  95. [104]

    2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton , B., Cantiello , M., Arras , P., et al. 2013, , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  96. [105]

    2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton , B., Marchant , P., Schwab , J., et al. 2015, , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  97. [106]

    J., & Mamajek , E

    Pecaut , M. J., & Mamajek , E. E. 2013, , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    2013 doi

  98. [107]

    M., Georgieva , I

    Persson , C. M., Georgieva , I. Y., Gandolfi , D., et al. 2022, , 666, A184, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244118

    2022 doi

  99. [108]

    S., Lubin , J., Beard , C., et al

    Polanski , A. S., Lubin , J., Beard , C., et al. 2024, , 272, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad4484

    2024 doi

  100. [109]

    A., Tout , C

    Rasio , F. A., Tout , C. A., Lubow , S. H., & Livio , M. 1996, , 470, 1187, 10.1086/177941

    1996 doi

  101. [110]

    2025, , 694, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452379

    Reza , A., Kubyshkina , D., Fossati , L., & Helling , C. 2025, , 694, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452379

    2025 doi

  102. [111]

    A., & Militzer , B

    Seager , S., Kuchner , M., Hier-Majumder , C. A., & Militzer , B. 2007, , 669, 1279, 10.1086/521346

    2007 doi

  103. [112]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 5335–5352, 10.1093/mnras/stz2861

    Sharma, S., Stello, D., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 5335–5352, 10.1093/mnras/stz2861

    2019 doi

  104. [113]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  105. [114]

    C., Stumpe, M

    Smith, J. C., Stumpe, M. C., Van Cleve, J. E., et al. 2012, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 124, 1000–1014, 10.1086/667697

    2012 doi

  106. [115]

    2022, , 931, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6e3c

    Stef \`a nsson , G., Mahadevan , S., Petrovich , C., et al. 2022, , 931, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6e3c

    2022 doi

  107. [116]

    C., Smith , J

    Stumpe , M. C., Smith , J. C., Catanzarite , J. H., et al. 2014, , 126, 100, 10.1086/674989

    2014 doi

  108. [117]

    C., Smith , J

    Stumpe , M. C., Smith , J. C., Van Cleve , J. E., et al. 2012, , 124, 985, 10.1086/667698

    2012 doi

  109. [118]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.21748, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.21748

    Tamayo , D., & Hadden , S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.21748, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.21748

    2024 doi arXiv

  110. [119]

    C., & Wisdom , J

    Tittemore , W. C., & Wisdom , J. 1990, , 85, 394, 10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-S

    1990 doi

  111. [120]

    2018, , 130, 035002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa7d9

    Tokovinin , A. 2018, , 130, 035002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa7d9

    2018 doi

  112. [121]

    2008, , 120, 170, 10.1086/528809

    Tokovinin , A., & Cantarutti , R. 2008, , 120, 170, 10.1086/528809

    2008 doi

  113. [122]

    2009, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 18, 67–126, 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Giménez, A. 2009, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 18, 67–126, 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    2009 doi

  114. [123]

    D., Clarke , B

    Twicken , J. D., Clarke , B. D., Bryson , S. T., et al. 2010, in , Vol. 7740, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy, 774023, 10.1117/12.856790

    2010 doi

  115. [124]

    D., Catanzarite, J

    Twicken, J. D., Catanzarite, J. H., Clarke, B. D., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130, 064502, 10.1088/1538-3873/aab694

    2018 doi

  116. [125]

    2019, , 157, 61, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f

    Van Eylen , V., Albrecht , S., Huang , X., et al. 2019, , 157, 61, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f

    2019 doi

  117. [126]

    2021, avanderburg/edmcmc: v1.0.0, v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5599854

    Vanderburg, A. 2021, avanderburg/edmcmc: v1.0.0, v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5599854

    2021 doi

  118. [127]

    W., Buchhave , L

    Vanderburg , A., Latham , D. W., Buchhave , L. A., et al. 2016 a , , 222, 14, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/14

    2016 doi

  119. [128]

    A., et al

    Vanderburg , A., Bieryla , A., Duev , D. A., et al. 2016 b , , 829, L9, 10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L9

    2016 doi

  120. [129]

    X., Rodriguez , J

    Vanderburg , A., Huang , C. X., Rodriguez , J. E., et al. 2019, , 881, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab322d

    2019 doi

  121. [130]

    I., & Jenkins, J

    Vines, J. I., & Jenkins, J. S. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 2719–2731, 10.1093/mnras/stac956

    2022 doi

  122. [131]

    A., Greklek-McKeon , M., et al

    Vissapragada , S., Knutson , H. A., Greklek-McKeon , M., et al. 2022, , 164, 234, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac92f2

    2022 doi

  123. [132]

    2017, , 154, 20, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa762b

    Wang , X., & Malhotra , R. 2017, , 154, 20, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa762b

    2017 doi

  124. [133]

    C., & Vanderburg , A

    Weisserman , D., Becker , J. C., & Vanderburg , A. 2023, , 165, 89, 10.3847/1538-3881/acac80

    2023 doi

  125. [134]

    d., Lewis, N

    Wit, J. d., Lewis, N. K., Langton, J., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 820, L33, 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/l33

    2016 doi

  126. [135]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  127. [136]

    2017, , 232, 2, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa80e4

    Xiang , M., Liu , X., Shi , J., et al. 2017, , 232, 2, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa80e4

    2017 doi

  128. [137]

    2001, , 136, 417, 10.1086/321795

    Yi , S., Demarque , P., Kim , Y.-C., et al. 2001, , 136, 417, 10.1086/321795

    2001 doi

  129. [138]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 934, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7be7

    Yoshida, T., Terada, N., Ikoma, M., & Kuramoto, K. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 934, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7be7

    2022 doi

  130. [139]

    2024, , 972, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ffb

    Yu , H., & Dai , F. 2024, , 972, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ffb

    2024 doi

  131. [140]

    D., & Jacobsen , S

    Zeng , L., Sasselov , D. D., & Jacobsen , S. B. 2016, , 819, 127, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/127

    2016 doi

  132. [141]

    B., Sasselov , D

    Zeng , L., Jacobsen , S. B., Sasselov , D. D., et al. 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 116, 9723, 10.1073/pnas.1812905116

    2019 doi

  133. [142]

    P., & Matsumura , S

    Zhang , K., Hamilton , D. P., & Matsumura , S. 2013, , 778, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/6

    2013 doi

  134. [143]

    2020, , 159, 19, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9

    Ziegler , C., Tokovinin , A., Brice \ n o , C., et al. 2020, , 159, 19, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.