Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 110 references

Domain formation and correlation effects in quenched uniaxial ferroelectrics: A stochastic model perspective

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the pattern of domains left by quenching a uniaxial ferroelectric is governed by an analytically solvable stochastic Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire model in which quenched Gaussian polarization disorder sets correlation…

desk verdict A useful but overclaiming review of the authors' own stochastic LGD model; the new material is mostly parameter scans and movies, and the flagship coercive-field 'prediction' is fitted to the same data it is validated against. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.11819 v1 pith:WL7IYUHH submitted 2025-05-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Olga Yu. Mazur , Yuri A. Genenko , Leonid I. Stefanovich This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords stochasticferroelectricdomainstructureformationpolarizationcorrelationsGaussrandomvariablestriglycinesulfateLandau-Ginzburg-Devonshiretheoryquencheddisordercoercivefieldcorrelationlength
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the disordered polarization pattern that appears when a uniaxial ferroelectric is quenched from the paraelectric into the ferroelectric phase can be described by a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire model in which the polarization is a Gaussian random field and quenched disorder dominates thermal fluctuations. In this formulation the coupled system for the mean polarization and the two-point correlation functions of polarization and electric field becomes analytically tractable, giving closed-form correlation lengths and correlation coefficients. Applied to triglycine sulfate, the model reproduces measured time-dependent correlation lengths and correlation functions on macroscopic scales, and it predicts that the coercive field grows monotonically with the initial amplitude and spatial size of the polarization fluctuations produced by the quench. If correct, this turns the apparently stochastic outcome of a quench into a design parameter: initial temperature and cooling rate can be chosen to tailor domain sizes, hysteresis loops, and switching fields.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the replacement of the random polarization field by its statistical description: a Gaussian random field with mean $\bar{\pi}(\tau)$ and two-point correlation function $K(s,\tau)=\langle \xi(\mathbf{r}_1,\tau)\,\xi(\mathbf{r}_2,\tau)\rangle$. Fourier-transforming all correlation functions reduces the stochastic LGD dynamics to a closed pair of equations for $\bar{\pi}(\tau)$ and $\tilde{K}(\mathbf{q},\tau)$, whose zero-mode part becomes a system for the mean and the variance $D(\tau)=K(0,\tau)$. The choice of initial correlation shape (Gaussian, exponential, or complementary error function) enters through the correlation length $L(\tau)$ and therefore controls both the kinetics of ordering and the predicted coercive field. The assumption that quenched disorder dominates thermal fluctuations is what removes the thermal-noise source term and leaves the analytically solvable deterministic system for the correlations.

What would settle it

Measure the full two-point polarization correlation function in a freshly quenched TGS crystal at short times and compare it, without refitting, with the three predicted closed forms; a correlation curve that cannot be represented by any of them would falsify the Gaussian-random-field ansatz. Independently, vary the initial temperature and cooling rate, measure the initial correlation radius immediately after the quench, and check whether the coercive field rises monotonically with that radius as the model predicts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the slab geometry of the TGS experiments, the authors take the post-quench polarization state to be $\pi(\mathbf{r},\tau)=\bar{\pi}(\tau)+\xi(\mathbf{r},\tau)$, with $\xi$ a zero-mean Gaussian random field, and derive from the LGD functional a closed system of integrodifferential equations for the mean polarization and the Fourier transform of the polarization correlation function $\tilde{K}(\mathbf{q},\tau)$. The central discovery is that for three choices of the initial correlation shape — Gaussian $\exp(-s^2/r_c^2)$, exponential $\exp(-s/\xi)$, and complementary error function — the correlation functions admit closed-form expressions, including the time-dependent correlation length, for example $L(\tau)=\sqrt{(r_c^2+4\tau)/3}$ in the Gaussian case, together with the full set of polarization, electric-field, and cross-correlation coefficients; the accompanying nonlinear evolution of the mean polarization and variance is integrated numerically. These expressions fit the TGS experimental correlation-length data and reproduce the qualitative behavior of the correlation curves along the lamellar domains. The model further predicts that the coercive field — the applied field separating final multidomain from single-domain states — increases monotonically with the initial disorder amplitude and correlation radius, so that quench parameters such as initial temperature and cooling rate control the switching properties.

Load-bearing premise

The entire closed-form solution rests on treating the state immediately after the quench as a Gaussian random field with one of three hand-chosen initial correlation shapes, whose amplitude, correlation radius, and time scale are fitted to the same experiments used for validation; if the real quench disorder is non-Gaussian, anisotropic, or described by a different initial correlation function, the analytic correlation functions and the coercive-field trend would not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is right, the final domain state after a quench is set by a small number of measurable inputs: initial mean polarization, initial variance, correlation radius, depolarization coefficient, susceptibility, and applied field.
  • The analytic correlation functions turn domain images from AFM, SFM, and SHG into a direct quantitative readout of quench conditions, without time-consuming phase-field or atomistic simulations.
  • The coercive field increases monotonically with the initial amplitude and spatial radius of quenched polarization fluctuations, so the same material can be made harder or easier to switch by changing cooling rate and starting temperature.
  • Including polarization-electric-field cross-correlations makes the multidomain state more stable and raises the coercive field by roughly a factor of three relative to calculations that ignore them.
  • The predicted correlation functions evolve toward isotropy in the polar plane as domains grow, so long-time monitoring of correlations can distinguish single-domain from multidomain final states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A sharper test than correlation-length fitting would be to record the full two-point correlation function at the earliest accessible time after the quench and see whether any of the three closed forms — Gaussian, exponential, or complementary error function — survives without refitting; the shape is not preserved by the dynamics, so early curves carry the most information about the true initial di
  • The monotonic coercive-field prediction suggests a controlled quench-protocol experiment: quench TGS from different initial temperatures and at different cooling rates, measure the initial correlation radius immediately after the quench by AFM or PFM, and check that the switching field follows that radius.
  • The same Gaussian-field machinery could be carried over to other uniaxial ferroelectrics, such as lead germanate, if the missing anisotropy terms are added; whether the analytical solvability survives that extension is an open question with direct bearing on materials where domain kinetics are too fast to observe directly.
  • The model's suppressed bound-charge correlations imply that apparently uncharged head-to-head and tail-to-tail walls need not contain free carriers; a direct comparison of charge-density signals measured at such walls with the model's predicted order-of-magnitude suppression would test that mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper develops and reviews a stochastic Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire (LGD) model for quenched uniaxial ferroelectrics, treating the polarization field as a Gaussian random field with an initial correlation function that can be Gaussian, exponential, or complementary-error-function in form. From a closed system of integrodifferential equations for the mean polarization and the polarization correlation function, the authors derive analytical expressions for correlation lengths, polarization correlation coefficients, electric-field correlations, and cross-correlations. They fit these expressions to TGS experimental data from Tomita et al., Likodimos et al., and Golitsyna et al. in Section 3.2, discuss the resulting phase portrait and coercive-field behavior in Section 2, and present new predictions for the spatial and temporal evolution of correlations in Sections 3.3, 4, and 5. The abstract claims that the system is analytically solvable, that the model explains TGS polarization-formation kinetics, and that it predicts the coercive-field dependence on the initial disordered state.

Significance. If the central claims are fully justified, the model would offer a rare analytical route to domain kinetics on macroscopic scales and a concrete link between quench protocols and switching properties. The paper has genuine strengths: it provides closed-form correlation functions for a model with self-consistent depolarization fields; it engages with a substantial body of TGS experiments; and it transparently acknowledges some limitations, such as the failure to describe transverse correlation oscillations and the overestimated coercive-field magnitude. However, the predictive content is weakened by the circular use of experimental data: the initial correlation shape and its length scale and amplitude are fitted to the same datasets that are used for validation, and no out-of-sample test is provided. The abstract overstates the analytical solvability and predictive status relative to the body of the paper. These issues are load-bearing for the main claims and require careful revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (4)–(5), and §3.2] The model's predictive claim is undermined by a fitting circularity. The initial correlation function shape is selected per dataset in Section 3.2 (Gaussian, exponential, or erfc), and the parameters rc or ξ, D(0), π̄(0), and t0 are fitted to the same experimental measurements used to claim validation. The paper even states that 'a validation against additional experiments remains imperative' for the exponential-shape preference. Because the predicted coercive-field dependence inherits these fitted initial parameters, the abstract's claim that the model 'predicts the dependence of the ferroelectric coercive field on the initial disordered state characteristics' is not supported by an independent test. The authors should provide an out-of-sample prediction, or derive the initial correlation shape and amplitude from the quench protocol (e.g., from the cooling dynamics of the LGD equation) rather than choosing them post hoc.
  2. [§3.2, Figs. 4–6] The agreement with experiment is presented mainly by visual inspection and is qualified by the paper's own statements: transverse correlations 'cannot be fitted good within the outcomes of our model', the oscillations in Fig. 6(a) 'defy quantitative description within the confines of the isotropic model', and for the Golitsyna et al. data all three correlation forms are 'deemed suitable only with a notable margin of error'. Given these admitted failures, the abstract's statement that the model 'provides explanations to a range of experimental results ... including the time-dependent correlation lengths and correlation functions' is too strong. The authors should restrict the claim to the quantities and datasets that are actually described well, and add quantitative goodness-of-fit measures or at least clearly state the fitted parameter values and their uncertainties.
  3. [§2, coercive-field discussion] The claimed coercive-field prediction is not demonstrated against experiment. The paper states that the predicted coercive fields are 'still too large in comparison with experimental values' and that the 'most significant result' is a monotonic increase of the coercive field with the initial amplitude and spatial size of fluctuations, obtained from numerical solutions of Eq. (5) with fitted inputs. No direct measurement of the initial fluctuation amplitude D(0) or correlation radius rc is presented, so the link between quench parameters (initial temperature, cooling rate) and coercive field remains a model-based trend rather than a tested prediction. The authors should either compare the predicted coercive-field trend with experimental data under varied quench conditions or explicitly label this as a prediction to be tested in future work, and adjust the abstract accordingly.
  4. [Abstract and §2, Eq. (4)] The abstract claims that the system of integrodifferential equations for correlation functions is 'analytically solvable', but the text in Section 2 (after Eq. (4)) and the concluding section state that 'the full analysis requires numerical solution of the system of nonlinear differential equations' and that 'the derived equations necessitate numerical solutions'. The analytical results apply to the correlation functions once the mean-field trajectory and the initial correlation form are supplied, not to the full evolution system. This discrepancy should be resolved by stating precisely what is analytically solved and what requires numerical treatment, both in the abstract and in Section 2.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§6 heading] The heading 'CONCUSION' should be corrected to 'CONCLUSION'.
  2. [§2, after Eq. (4)] In the sentence introducing the Fourier transforms, the correlation function Rαβ(s, τ) appears without its time argument: 'Rαβ(s,)' should read 'Rαβ(s, τ)'.
  3. [§2, Eq. (4)] The term '(q2 + η qz2/q2)' contains an unreadable glyph for η in the typeset equation; please ensure the equation renders correctly.
  4. [Figure 6 caption] The caption 'with exponential correlation coefficient [60]' appears to contain a citation error; the exponential-form correlation fits are from the authors' prior work [70], not from reference [60].
  5. [Reference list] Reference [59] spells the author name 'Kolomgorov' instead of 'Kolmogorov', and several references inconsistently omit article titles; please standardize the reference format.
  6. [Throughout, esp. §3.2] The names 'Golitsina' and 'Golitsyna' are used inconsistently in the text and figure captions; the spelling should be unified to match the cited references.
  7. [§3.1, Eq. (6)] The symbol ξ is used for the exponential correlation length in Section 2 and also for the long-range correlation length in Eq. (6); consider using a distinct notation (e.g., λ_lr) to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

TGS 'explanations' and the coercive-field trend inherit the initial correlation shape and scale fitted to the same experiments; the model's independent content lies only in unfitted illustrative predictions.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2 (paragraph after Eq. (4)) and Section 3.2, Figs. 4-6]
    "Therefore, the assumptions of the exponential ( K(s, 0) ≈ exp(−s/ξ)) and the complementary error function (K(s, 0) ≈ erfc(s/ξ)) forms of initial correlation function were studied [70] and showed a good agreement with the pioneering experimental results by Tomita et al. [44] for the exponential function. Nevertheless, all the obtained forms of correlation functions can be useful for characterizing domain structures and optimized fitting, since in each specific experiment the initial disorder can have different properties as will be shown in Section 3."

    The model's time-dependent correlation functions and correlation lengths are solutions of Eqs. (4)-(5) that require the initial correlation K(s,0) as input. In Section 2 the paper selects among Gaussian, exponential, and erfc forms and fits their scale (rc, ξ) to the same TGS datasets (Tomita, Likodimos, Golitsyna) that are then presented as validation; Section 3.2 says the exponential shape is 'preferred' for Tomita but that 'a validation against additional experiments remains imperative.' Since the initial correlation shape is chosen per experiment and the scale is optimized, the agreement of the predicted L(τ) and C(s,τ) with those experiments is a post-hoc fit of the model's initial condition, not an out-of-sample prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 2, coercive-field paragraph after Fig. 3]
    "It was shown that the magnitude of the coercive field changes from larger to smaller for Gaussian, exponential and complementary error function adopted for K(s, 0), respectively [70]. ... the most significant result for applications here is the monotonic increase of the coercive field with both the initial amplitude and the initial spatial size of the polarization fluctuations immediately after quenching to the low-temperature ferroelectric phase [70]."

    The coercive field in this model is read off from the saddle-point structure of system (5), whose solutions depend on the initial variance D(0) and initial correlation radius rc—the 'initial amplitude and initial spatial size of the polarization fluctuations.' Section 3.2 fits those same quantities (via K(s,0)) to the TGS correlation measurements. The claimed prediction of a monotonic coercive-field increase with initial disorder is therefore a consequence of the fitted initial conditions, not a prediction from independently measured quench parameters; the paper itself states the magnitudes are 'still too large' and offers no quantitative relation connecting cooling rate or initial temperature to D(0) and rc.

full rationale

This review delegates the derivation of the central equations (3)-(5) and all closed-form correlation functions to the authors' prior papers [68-70]. That delegation is self-citation, but reviewing one's own derivations is not circular by itself, so I do not score it as an independent circular step. The concrete circularity is in the use of the initial correlation function K(s,0). The model requires K(s,0) as an input; its shape and scale determine L(τ) and C(s,τ) through Eqs. (4)-(5). The paper selects the shape (Gaussian, exponential, or erfc) per TGS dataset and fits rc/ξ/t0 to the same correlation-length and correlation-function data that are then exhibited as agreement, explicitly calling this 'optimized fitting' and conceding that validation against additional experiments 'remains imperative.' The coercive-field trend is then derived from the same system with those fitted initial conditions, so the abstract's claim of predicting coercive-field dependence on the initial disordered state is a consequence of fitted inputs rather than an independent, out-of-sample prediction. Sections 3.3-5 contain genuinely unfitted, illustrative predictions of correlation anisotropies and electric-field correlations for arbitrary parameter values, which give the model independent content and keep the circularity partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's output depends on the initial random state and several dimensionless inputs. The most consequential are the form and parameters of the initial correlation function, which are not derived from the quench mechanism and are fitted to the experimental data used for validation. The physical assumptions, single-component polarization, isotropy, no thermal noise, and no defect nucleation, are stated in the paper but are not independently verified. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial correlation radius rc (Gaussian) or xi (exponential/erfc) = Not tabulated; rc=1 in illustrative figures
    Fitted to TGS correlation-length data in Section 3.2; controls L(tau) and all correlation functions.
  • Initial variance D(0) = 0.1 in Fig. 3
    Amplitude of the quenched disorder after the quench; chosen by hand and strongly affects the phase trajectory and final domain state.
  • Initial mean polarization pi_bar(0) = 0 in Fig. 3
    Assumed zero for a symmetric quench; an input condition rather than a prediction.
  • Initial correlation function shape = Gaussian, exponential, or erfc
    Selected post hoc per experimental dataset; the paper finds that different shapes are needed for different experiments and that the shape is not derived from the quench mechanism.
  • Time scale t0 = 35000 s in Fig. 6
    Used to convert experimental time t to dimensionless tau; effectively a fit parameter for each dataset.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LGD energy functional with a single polarization component and isotropic gradient, plus the dielectric-layer geometry.
    Eq. (1)-(3) neglect crystal anisotropy within the polar plane. The paper states this prevents fitting transverse correlations and observed oscillations.
  • ad hoc to paper All random fields are Gaussian random fields.
    Section 2 after Eq. (2): variables are 'considered in this model as Gauss random fields'. This closure is not derived from the defect statistics or the quench process.
  • domain assumption Quenched disorder dominates thermal fluctuations.
    Section 2 states thermal fluctuations are neglected when quenched disorder is large enough; this fails in the window TC-T < 0.02 K, and experiments at Delta T = 0.1 K show oscillations the model does not capture.
  • domain assumption Order-parameter kinetics is relaxational Landau-Khalatnikov without nucleation on defects or electrodes.
    Eq. (3) and Section 6: the paper attributes the too-large predicted coercive field to missing nucleation effects from defects and electrodes.
  • standard math Depolarization fields obey the Poisson equation with a background permittivity.
    Second line of Eq. (3); standard electrostatics under the planar sample geometry of Fig. 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Domain formation and correlation effects in quenched uniaxial ferroelectrics: A stochastic model perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WL7IYUHH

@misc{pith2026250511819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Domain formation and correlation effects in quenched uniaxial ferroelectrics: A stochastic model perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WL7IYUHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.11819}
}
read the original abstract

The stochastic analysis of the polarization domain structures, emerging after quenching from a paraelectric to a ferroelectric state, in terms of the polarization correlation functions and their Fourier transforms is a fast and effective tool of the materials structure characterization. In spite of a significant volume of experimental data accumulated over the last three decades for the model uniaxial ferroelectric triglycine sulfate, there were no theoretical tools to comprehend these data until now. This work summarizes the recent progress in understanding of the experiments by means of the original stochastic model of polarization structure formation based on the Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire theory and the Gauss random field concept assuming the predominance of the quenched polarization disorder over the thermal fluctuations. The system of integrodifferential equations for correlation functions of random polarization and electric field turns out to be analytically solvable. The model provides explanations to a range of experimental results on the polarization formation kinetics including the time-dependent correlation lengths and correlation functions on the macroscopic spatial and time scales. Notably, it predicts the dependence of the ferroelectric coercive field on the initial disordered state characteristics, which can be controlled by quenching parameters like the initial temperature and the cooling rate, thus paving the way for tailoring the functional properties of the material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.11819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A ferroelectric crystal of thickness hf is placed between two electrodes and separated from the top by a dielectric layer of thickness hd. The ferroelectric slab is infinite in the (x, y) plane and the polar axis is along the z direction in the Cartesian (x, y, z) frame. We consider the evolution of the system from the initial state emerged after cooling from the paraelectric phase to the ferroelectric one at temper… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic image of the variety of phase trajectories of domain ordering. Points I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Numerical solution of the system of equations (5) for the initial parameters 𝜋̅0 = 0, D(0) = 0.1, αz = 0.625, η = 10, rc = 1 and external electric field 𝜖𝑎: 0.03; 0.076; 0.077; 0.1 for the curves 1–4, respectively. (a) phase pattern in coordinates of average polarization and its variance (𝜋̅, D) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fitting the experimental data (dots) for correlation length L [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fitting the experimental data for the correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fitting of experimental data on correlations along the lamellar domains by Golitsina [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: illustrates the progression of correlations, as the distance between points increases, showcasing both the attenuation of correlations (a) and the accentuation of anisotropic tendencies (b), notably along the polar axis and with subtle manifestations in other direction…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time evolution of polarization correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time evolution of electric field correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Electric field correlations 𝑟𝑥𝑥(𝐬, 𝜏) for parameters: (a) τ = 0.01 and s = 3; (b) τ = 1 and s = 10. Animated plots are presented by movies in Supplemental materials S3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Electric field correlations 𝑟𝑥𝑦(𝐬, 𝜏) for parameters: (a) τ = 0.01 and s = 3; (b) τ = 1 and s = 5. Animated plots are presented by movies in Supplemental materials S4 5. CROSS-CORRELATIONS BETWEEN POLARIZATION AND ELECTRIC FIELD COMPONENTS Formation of finite-size dom…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Time evolution of 𝜓𝑧𝑧(𝐬, 𝜏) cross-correlations as a function of the polar angle at different values s: 1 (a), 3 (b), 20 (c). The detailed development of correlations is shown by movie S5a in Supplemental materials S5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Evolution of 𝜓𝑧𝑧(𝐬, 𝜏) cross-correlations as a function of the polar angle depending on distance s at τ = 5. It is presented in detail by movie S5b for τ = 1 in Supplemental materials S5 At present, the developed stochastic theory offers a descriptive examination of p…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. Guo, W. Chen, H. Chen, Y. Zhao, F. Dong, W. Liu, and Y. Zhang, Recent progress in optical control of ferroelectric polarization, Adv. Optical Mater. 9 (2021) 2002146. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202002146

    doi:10.1002/adom.202002146 2021

  2. [2]

    Shkuratov, C.S

    S.I. Shkuratov, C.S. Lynch, A review of ferroelectric materials for high power devices, Journal of Materiomics 8 (2022) 739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2022.04.002

    doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2022.04.002 2022

  3. [3]

    H. Tan, A. Quintana, N. Dix, S. Estandia, J. Sort, F. Sanchez, I. Fina, Photovoltaic-driven dual optical writing and non-destructive voltage-less reading of polarization in ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 for energy efficient memory devices, Nano Energy 123 (2024) 109384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109384

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    D. Wang, S. Hao, B. Dkhil, B. Tian, C. Duan, Ferroelecric materials for neuroinspired computing applications, Fundamental Research (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.013 2023

  5. [5]

    M. Li, Z. Zou, Z. Xu, J. Zheng, Y. Li, R. Tao, Z. Fan, G. Zhou, X. Lu, J. Liu, Ferroelectric polarization and conductance filament coupling for large window and high -reliability resistive memory and energy -efficient synaptic devices, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 198 (2024) 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.039 2024

  6. [6]

    Sinha, S

    N. Sinha, S. Bhandari, H. Yadav, G. Ray, S. Godara, N. Tyagi, J. Dalal, S. Kumar, and B. Kumar, Performance of crystal violet doped triglycine sulfate single crystals for optical and communication applications, Cr yst. Eng. Comm. 17 (2015) 5757. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE00703H

    work page doi:10.1039/c5ce00703h 2015

  7. [7]

    Sudhakaran, J

    J.M. Sudhakaran, J. Philip, Triglycine sulphate and its deuterated analog in polyurethane matrix to thermal/infrared detection: A comparison, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 132 (2015) 42250. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.42250 41

    work page doi:10.1002/app.42250 2015

  8. [8]

    Ghane-Motlagh, and P

    R. Ghane-Motlagh, and P. Woias, A pyroelectric thin film of oriented Triglycine sulfate nanocrystals for thermal energy harvesting, Smart Mater. Struct. 28 ( 2019) 104002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3910

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ab3910 2019

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    He, W.-C

    Z.-D. He, W.-C. Li, J.-L. Yang, H.-K. Xu, G.-X. Lai, Y.-D. Che, W.-L. Zhu, X.-D. Yang, and X.-Y. Chen, Tuning ferroelectric photovoltaic perform ance in R3c-CuNbO3 through compressive strain engineering: a first -principles study, RSC Adv. 13 (2023) 34475. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    J. Wang, Z. Peng, J. Wang, D. Wu, Z. Yang, X. Chao, Band gap tunning to enhance photovoltaic response in NaNbO3-based bulk ferroelectrics, Scripta Materialia 221 (2022) 114976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114976

    2022

  3. [11]

    X. Yang, X. Gao, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Zhang, X. Song, C. Lu, Y. Li, L. Zhang, X. Hao, Anomalous photovoltaic effect in Na 0.5Bi0.5TiO3-based ferroelectric ceramics based on domain engineering, Journal of Materiomics (20 23) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2023.10.010

    doi

  4. [12]

    Davis, D

    M. Davis, D. Damjanovic, D. Hayem, and N. Setter, Domain engineering of the transverse piezoelectric coefficient in perovskite ferroeletrics, J. Appl . Phys. 98 (2005) 014102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1929091

    2005 doi

  5. [13]

    S. Wada, K. Yako, H. Kakemoto, T. Tsurumi, T. Kiguchi, Enhanced piezoelectric properties of barium titanate single crystals with different engin eered-domain sizes, J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 014109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1957130

    2005 doi

  6. [14]

    C. Qiu, B. Wang, N. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Liu, D. Walker, Y. Wang, H. Tian, T.R. Shrout, Z. Xu, L.-Q. Chen, F. Li, Transparent ferroelectric crystals with ultrahigh piezoelectricity, Nature 577 (2020) 350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1891-y

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Thong, Z

    H.-C. Thong, Z. Li, J. -T. Lu, C.-B.-W. Li, Y.-X. Liu, Q. Sun, Z. Fu, Y. Wei, K. Wang, Domain engineering in bulk ferroelectric ceramics via mesoscopic chemical 42 inhomogeneity, Advanced Science 9 (2022) 2200998. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202200998

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Klomp, R

    A.J. Klomp, R. Khachaturyan, T. Wallis, K. Albe, and A. Grunebohm, Thermal stability of nanoscale ferroelectric domains by molecular dynamics modeling, Phys. Rev. Materials 6 (2022) 104411. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.104411

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Meier, and S.M

    D. Meier, and S.M. Selbach, Ferroelectric domain walls for nanotechnology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7 (2022) 157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00375-z

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Schultheiß, G

    J. Schultheiß, G. Picht, J. Wang, Y.A. Genenko, L.Q. Chen, J.E. Daniels, and J. Koruza, Ferroelectric polycrystals: Structural and microstructural levers for property -engineering via domain -wall dynamics, Progr. Mater. Sci. 136 (2023) 101101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsc...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Pandya, G.A

    S. Pandya, G.A. Velarde, R. Gao, A.S. Everhardt, J.D. Wilbur, R. Xu, J.T. Maher, J.C. Agar, C. Dames, and L.W. Martin, Understanding the role of ferr oelastic domains on the pyroelectric and electrocaloric effects in ferroelectric thin films, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1803312. htt...

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Nataf, M

    G.F. Nataf, M. Guennou, J.M. Gregg, D . Meier, J. Hlinka, E.K.H. Salje, and J. Kreisel, Domain-wall engineering and topological defects in ferroelectric and ferroelastic materials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 (2020) 634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0235-z

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    Matyjasek, Influence of temperature on the depolarization process in telluric acid ammonium phosphate crystal, J

    K. Matyjasek, Influence of temperature on the depolarization process in telluric acid ammonium phosphate crystal, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 (2002) 3027. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/35/22/319

    2002 doi

  14. [22]

    Matyjasek, Analysis of the switching process in triglycine sulphate crystals based on the Avrami model, J

    K. Matyjasek, Analysis of the switching process in triglycine sulphate crystals based on the Avrami model, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 (2001) 2211. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022- 3727/34/14/317 43

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Okino, J

    H. Okino, J. Sakamoto, and T. Yamamoto, Cooling -rate dependent domain structures of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3−PbTiO3 single crystals observed by contact resonance piezoresponse force microscopy, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 43 (2004) 6808. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.6808

    2004 doi

  16. [24]

    Okino, J

    H. Okino, J. Sakamoto, and T. Yamamoto, Cooling-rate dependence of dielectric constant and domain structures in (1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–xPbTiO3 single crystals, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 44 (2005) 7160. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.7160

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    D. S. Kim, C. I. Cheon, S. S. Lee, and J. S. Kim, Effect of cooling rate on phase transitions and ferroelectric properties in 0.75BiFeO3−0.25BaTiO3 ceram ics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 (2016) 202902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967742

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Muramatsu, H

    H. Muramatsu, H. Nagata, and T. Takenaka, Quenching effects for piezoelectric properties on lead -free (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3 ceramics, Jpn. J. Appl Phys 55 (2016) 10TB07. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.10TB07

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    K. V. Lalitha, J. Koruza, and J. Rodel, Propensity for spontaneous relaxor -ferroelectric transition in quenched (Na1/2Bi1/2)T iO3−BaTiO3 compositions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 (2018) 252902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053989

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    J. Ma, Y. Zhu, Y. Tang, M. Han, Y. Wang, N. Zhang, M. Zou, Y. Feng, W. Geng , and X. Ma, Modulation of charged a1/a2 domains and piezoresponses of tensile strained PbTiO3 films by the cooling rate, RSC Adv. 9 (2019) 13981. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra02485a

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Ehara, D

    Y. Ehara, D. Ichinose, M. Kodera, T. Shiraishi, T. Shimizu, T. Yamada, K. Nishida, and H. Funakubo, Influence of cooling rate on ferroelastic domain structure for epitaxial (100)/(001)-oriented Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 thin films under tensile strain, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 60 (2021) SFFB07....

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    J. Liu, W. Chen, B. Wang, and Y. Zheng, Theoretical methods of domain structures in ultrathin ferroelectric films: A review, Materials 7 (2014) 6502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096502

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    Chen, Phase-field method of phase transitions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A review, J

    L.-Q. Chen, Phase-field method of phase transitions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A review, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 (2008) 1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551- 2916.2008.02413.x

    2008

  24. [32]

    Potnis, N

    P.R. Potnis, N. -T. Tsou, and J.E. Huber, A review of domain modelling and domain imaging techniques in ferroelectric crystals, Materials 4 (2011) 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma4020417

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    Marton and J

    P. Marton and J. Hlinka, Simulation of domain patterns in BaTiO 3, Phase Transit. 79 (2006) 467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411590600892351

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    Bak, T.S

    O. Bak, T.S. Holstad, Y. Tan, H. Lu, D.M. Evans, K.A. Hunnestad, B. Wang, J.P.V. McConville, P. Becker, L. Bohaty, I. Lukyanchuk, V.M. Vinokur, A.T.J. van Helvoort, J.M. Gregg, L. -Q. Chen, D. Meier, A. Gruverman, Observation of unconventional dynamics of domain walls n uniaxi...

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Indergand, A

    R. Indergand, A. Vidyasagar, N. Nadkarni, and D.M. Kochmann, A phase-field approach to studying the temperature-dependent ferroelectric response of bulk polycrystalline PZT, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 144 (2020) 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104098

    2020

  28. [36]

    Indergand, X

    R. Indergand, X. Bruant, D.M. Kochmann, Domain pattern formation in tetragonal ferroelectric ceramics, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 181 (2023) 105426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105426

    2023

  29. [37]

    Y. Cao, A. Morozovska, and S.V. Kalinin, Pressure induced switching in ferroelectrics: Phase-filed modeling, electrochemistry, flexoelectric effect, and bulk vacancy dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 184109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184109 45

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Vorotiahin, A.N

    I.S. Vorotiahin, A.N. Morozovska, E.A. Eliseev, and Y.A. Genenko, Control of domain states in rhombohedral lead zirconate titanate films via strains and s urface charges, Adv. Electron. Mater. 8 (2022) 2100386. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100386

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Grunebohm, M

    A. Grunebohm, M. Marathe, R. Khachaturyan, R. Schiedung, D.C. Lupascu, , V.V. Schwartsman, Interplay of domain structure and phase transitions: theory , experiment and functionality, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34 (2021) 073002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 648X/ac3607

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    Y.-H. Shin, I. Grinberg, I. -W. Chen, A.M. Rappe, Nucleation and growth mechan ism of ferroelectric domain -wall motion, Nature 449 (2007) 881. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06165

    2007 doi

  33. [41]

    S. Liu, I. Grinberg, A.M. Rappe, Intrinsic ferroelectric switching from first principles, Nature 534 (2016) 360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18286

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    Tikhomirova, S.A

    N.A. Tikhomirova, S.A. Pikin, L.A. Shuvalov, L.I. Dontsova, E.S. Popov, A.V. Shilnikov, L.G. Bulatova, Visualization of static and the dynamics of domain structure in triglycine sulfate by liquid crystals, Ferroelectrics 29 (1980) 145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198008008470

    1980 doi

  35. [43]

    Nakatani, Ferroelectric domain structure in TGS just below the Curie point after heat treatment, Jpn

    N. Nakatani, Ferroelectric domain structure in TGS just below the Curie point after heat treatment, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24 (1985) L528. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.24.L528

    1985 doi

  36. [44]

    Tomita, H

    N. Tomita, H. Orihara, and Y. Ishibashi, Ferroelectric domain pattern evolution in quenched triglycine sulphate, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58 (1989) 1190. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.58.1190

    1989 doi

  37. [45]

    Orihara, N

    H. Orihara, N. Tomita, and Y. Ishibashi, Pattern evolution of ferroelectric domain structure in TGS quenched below phase transition point, Ferroelectrics 95 (1989) 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198908245176 46

    1989 doi

  38. [46]

    Likodimos, M

    V. Likodimos, M. Labardi, and M. Allegrini, Kinetics of ferroelectric domains investigated by scanning force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 14440. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14440

    2000 doi

  39. [47]

    Likodimos, M

    V. Likodimos, M. Labardi, X. K. Orlik, L. Pardi, M. Allegrini, S. Emonin, and O. Marti, Thermally activated ferroelectric domain growth due to random defects, Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 064104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.064104

    2001 doi

  40. [48]

    Likodimos, M

    V. Likodimos, M. Labardi, and M. Allegrini, Domain pattern formation and kinetics on ferroelectric surfaces under thermal cycling using sca nning force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 024104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.024104

    2002 doi

  41. [49]

    E.Z. Luo, Z. Xie, J.B. Xu, I.H. Wilson, and L.H. Zhao, In situ observation of the ferroelectric-paraelectric phase transition in a triglycine sulfate single crystal by variable - temperature electrostatic force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 203. https://doi.org/10.1103/Ph...

    2000 doi

  42. [50]

    Naka tani, Observation of ferroelectric domain structure in TGS, Ferroelectrics 413 (2011) 238

    N. Naka tani, Observation of ferroelectric domain structure in TGS, Ferroelectrics 413 (2011) 238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2011.554269

    2011

  43. [51]

    Drozhdin and O.M

    S.N. Drozhdin and O.M. Golitsyna, Temperature and time beh avior of the parameters of the domain structure of triglycine sulfate crystals near the phase transition, Phys. Solid State 54 (2012) 905. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783412050071

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    Ovchinnikova, N.V

    G.I. Ovchinnikova, N.V. Belugina, R.V. Gainutdinov, E.S. Ivanova, V.V. Grebenev, A.K. Lashkova, and A.L. Tolstikhina, Temperature dynamics of triglycine sulfate domain structure according to atomic force microscopy and dielectric spectroscopy data, Phys. Solid State 58 (2016) ...

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    Wehmeier, T

    L. Wehmeier, T. Kämpfe, A. Haußmann, and L. M. Eng , In situ 3D observation of the domain wall dynamics in a triglycine sulfate single crystal upon ferroelectric phase 47 transition, Phys. Status Solidi - Rapid Res. Lett. 11 (2017) 1700267. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201700267

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Golitsyna, S.N

    O.M. Golitsyna, S.N. Drozhdin, V.O. Chulakova, and M.N. Grechkina, Evolution of the domain structure of triglycine sulphate single crystal in the vicinity of phase transition, Ferroelectrics 506 (2017) 127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2017.1282286

    2017

  47. [55]

    Golitsyna and S.N

    O.M. Golitsyna and S.N. Drozhdin, Formation of a quasi-equilibrium domain structure of crystals of the TGS group near TC, Condens. Matter Interphases 23 (2021) 507. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3669

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Turygin, M.S

    A.P. Turygin, M.S. Kosobokov, O.M. Golitsyna, S.N. Drozhdin, and V. Y. Shur, Unusual domain growth during local switching in triglycine sulfate crystals, Appl . Phys. Lett. 119 (2021) 262902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077685

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    Nattermann, Static and dynamic critical behaviour of uniaxial ferroelectrics and the phase transition in TGS, Phys

    T. Nattermann, Static and dynamic critical behaviour of uniaxial ferroelectrics and the phase transition in TGS, Phys. Stat. Solidi 85 (19 78) 291. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2220850132

    doi

  50. [58]

    Ishibashi and Y

    Y. Ishibashi and Y. Takagi, Note on ferroelectric domain switching, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 31 (1971) 506. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.31.506

    1971 doi

  51. [59]

    A. N. Kolomgorov, On the statistical theory of crystallization of metals Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 1 (1937) 355

    1937

  52. [60]

    Hashimoto, H

    S. Hashimoto, H. Orihara and Y. Ishibashi, Study on D-E hysteresis loop of TGS based on the Avrami-type model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1994) 1601. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.63.1601

    1994 doi

  53. [61]

    Kalkum, H

    F. Kalkum, H. A. Eggert, T. Jungk and K. Buse, A stochastic model for periodic domain structuring in ferroelectric crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 102 (2007) 014104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2752545 48

    2007 doi

  54. [62]

    Rao and A

    M. Rao and A. Chakrabarti, Kinetics of Domain Growth in a Random-Field Model in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3501

    1993 doi

  55. [63]

    L. I. Stefanovich, Formation and growth dynamics of domains under phase transitions in an external field, Low Temp. Phys. 24 (1998) 643. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.593652

    1998 doi

  56. [64]

    Gumennyk, L

    K. Gumennyk, L. Stefanovich, and E. Feldman, Kinetics of coupled ordering and segregation in antiphas e domains, Phys. Status Solidi B 246 (2009) 56. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200844277

    2009 doi

  57. [65]

    Feldman, L.I

    E.P. Feldman, L.I. Stefanovich, and Y.V. Terekhova, Influence of adsorption or desorption an surface diffusion on the formation kinetics of open half-monolayer coverage, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 062406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062406

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    B. M. Darinskii, A. P. Lazarev, and A. S. Sigov, JETP 87 (1998) 12 21. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.558616

    1998 doi

  59. [67]

    Bray, Theory of phase -ordering kinetics, Advances in Physics 43 (1994) 357

    A.J. Bray, Theory of phase -ordering kinetics, Advances in Physics 43 (1994) 357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018739400101505

    1994 doi

  60. [68]

    Mazur, L.I

    O.Y. Mazur, L.I. Stefanovich, and Y.A. Genenko, Stochastic theory of ferroelectric domain structure formation dominated by quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 144109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.144109

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    Genenko, O.Y

    Y.A. Genenko, O.Y. Mazur, and L.I. Stefanovich, Statistical correlations of random polarization and electric depolarization fields in ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 134101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.134101

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    Mazur, L.I

    O.Y. Mazur, L.I. Stefanovich, and Y.A. Genenko, Universal kinetics of stochastic formation of polarization domain structures in a uniaxial single-crystal ferroelectric, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 104117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.104117 49

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    A. K. Tagantsev, L. E. Cross, J. Fousek, Domains in Ferroic Crystals and Thin Films, Springer, New Jork, 2010

    2010

  64. [72]

    Mazur, L.I

    O.Yu. Mazur, L.I. Stefanovich, V.M. Yurchenko, Influence of Quenching Conditions on the Kinetics of Formation of a Domain Structure of Ferroelectrics, Physics of the Solid State 57 (2015) 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783415030142

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    Landauer, Electrostatic considerations in BaTiO3 domain formation during polarization reversal, J

    R. Landauer, Electrostatic considerations in BaTiO3 domain formation during polarization reversal, J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1957) 227. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722712

    1957 doi

  66. [74]

    Miller, G

    R.C. Miller, G. Weinreich, Mechanism for the sidewise motion of 180º domain walls in barium titanate, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 1460. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.117.1460

    1960 doi

  67. [75]

    Gerra, A.K

    G. Gerra, A.K. Tagantsev, N. Setter, Surface -stimulated nucleation of reverse domains in ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005 ) 107602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.107602

    2005 doi

  68. [76]

    Vogt and D

    H. Vogt and D. Weinmann, Optical second harmonic generation during ferroelectric polarization reversal, Phys. Stat. Sol. 14 (1972) 501. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210140215

    1972 doi

  69. [77]

    Shur, V.A

    V.Y. Shur, V.A. Sikhova, D.V. Pelegov, A.V. Ievlev, and L.I. Ivleva, Formation of Nanodomain Ensembles during Polarization reversal in Sr 0.61Ba0.39Nb2O6: Ce single crystals, Physics of the Solid State 53 (2011) 2311. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378341111028X

    2011 doi

  70. [78]

    Akhmatkhanov, M.A

    A.R. Akhmatkhanov, M.A. Chuvakova, M.S. Nebogatikov, Y.V. Shaydurov, and V.Y. Shur, Domain splitting in lithium niobate with surface dielectric layer, Ferroe lectrics 559 (2020) 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2020.1721999

    2020

  71. [79]

    K. Li, E. Sun, X. Qi, B. Yang, J. Liu, W. Cao, Dielectric relaxation and local domain structures of ferroelectric PIMNT and PMNT single crystals, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16849 50

    2019 doi

  72. [80]

    X. Qi, K. Li, L. Bian, E. Sun, L. Zheng, and R. Zhang, Domain structure and dielectric diffusion-relaxation characteristics of ternary Pb(In 1/2Nb1/2)O3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 ceramics, Journal of Advanced Dielectrics 12 (2022) 2241002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010135X22410028

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    Shvartsman, A.L

    V.V. Shvartsman, A.L. Kholkin, A. Orlova, D. Kiselev, A.A. Bogomolov, and A. Sternberg, Polar nanodomains and local ferroelectric phenomena in relaxor lead lanthanum zirconate titanate ceramics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005) 202907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1923756

    2005 doi

  74. [82]

    Shvartsman, A.L

    V.V. Shvartsman, A.L. Kholkin, Evolution of nanodomains in 0.9PbMg 1/3Nb2/3O3- 0.1PbTiO3, J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 064108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2713084

    2007 doi

  75. [83]

    Shvartsman, J

    V.V. Shvartsman, J. Dec, T. Lukasiewicz, A.L. Kholkin, and W. Kleemann, Evolution of the polar structure in relaxor ferroelectrics close to the curie temperature studied by piezoresponse force microscopy, Ferroelectrics 373 (2008) 77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190802408739

    2008 doi

  76. [84]

    Balke, I

    N. Balke, I. Bdikin, S.V. Kalinin, and A.L. Kholkin, Electromechanical imaging and spectroscopy of ferroelectric and piezoelectric materials: state of the ar t and prospects for the future, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 (2009) 1629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551- 2916.2009.03240.x

    2009

  77. [85]

    Bintachitt, S

    P. Bintachitt, S. Trolier -McKinstry, K. Seal, S. Jesse and S. V. Kalinin, S witching spectroscopy piezoresponse force microscopy of polycrystalline capacitor structures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 042906. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3070543

    2009 doi

  78. [86]

    K. Seal, S. Jesse, M. P. Nikiforov, S. V. Kalinin, I. Fujii, P. Bintachitt and S. Trolier - McKinstry, Spatially resolved spectroscopic mapping of polarization reversal in polycrystalline ferroelectric films: crossing the resolution barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 057601....

    2009 doi

  79. [87]

    A. L. Tolstikhina, N. V. Belugina and R. V. Gainutdinov, Application of the Fourier transforms for analysis of the domain structure images of uniax ial ferroelectric, Crystallogr. Rep. 62 (2017) 464. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774517030221

    2017 doi

  80. [88]

    Weymann, S

    C. Weymann, S. Cherifi-Hertel, C. Lichtensteiger, I. Gaponenko, K.D. Dorkenoo, A.B. Naden and P. Paruc h, Non-Ising domain walls in c-phase ferroelectric lead titanate thin films, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) L241404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L241404

    2022 doi

  81. [89]

    Lichtensteiger, M

    C. Lichtensteiger, M. Hadjimichael, E. Zatterin, C. -P. Su, I. Gaponenko, L. Tovaglieri, P. Paruch, A. Gloter, and J. -M. Triscone, Mapping the complex evolution of ferroelastic/ferroelectric domain patterns in epitaxially strained PbTiO 3 heterostructures, APL Mater. 11 (2023...

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    Vogt, Study of structural phase transitions by techniques of nonlinear optics, Appl

    H. Vogt, Study of structural phase transitions by techniques of nonlinear optics, Appl. Phys. 5 (1974) 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00928219

    1974 doi

  83. [91]

    Dolino, Effects of domain shapes on second-harmonic scattering in triglycine sulfate, 6 (1972) 4025

    G. Dolino, Effects of domain shapes on second-harmonic scattering in triglycine sulfate, 6 (1972) 4025. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4025

    1972 doi

  84. [92]

    Nesterov, S

    O. Nesterov, S. Matzen, C. Magen, A.H.G. Vlooswijk, G. Catalan, and B. Noheda, Thickness scaling of ferroelastic domains in PbTiO 3 films on DyScO 3, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (2013) 142901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4823536

    2013 doi

  85. [93]

    McCluskey, A

    C.J. McCluskey, A. Kumar, A. Gruverman, I. Luk’yanchuk, and J.M. Gregg, Domain wall saddle point morphology in ferroelectric triglycine sulfate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 (2023) 222902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152518

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    D. Wolf, A. Lubk, P. Prete, N. Lovergine, and H. Lichte, 3D mapping of nanoscale electric potentials in semiconductor structures using electron -holographic tomography, Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 (2016) 364004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/36/364004 52

    2016 doi

  87. [95]

    Khachaturyan and Y.A

    R. Khachaturyan and Y.A. Genenko, Correlated polarization -switching kinetics in bulk polycrystalline ferroelectrics. II. Impact of crystalline phase symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 134106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134106

    2018 doi

  88. [96]

    Tikhonov, J.R

    Y. Tikhonov, J.R. Maguire, C.J. McCluskey, J.P.V. McConville, A. Kumar, H. Lu, D. Meier, A. Razumnaya, J.M. Gregg, A. Gruverman, V.M. Vinokur, and I. Luk’yanchuk, Polarization topology at the nominally charged domain walls in uniaxial ferroelectrics, Advanced Materials 34 (202...

    2022 doi

  89. [97]

    Mulvmill, K

    M.L. Mulvmill, K. Uchino, Z. Li, and W. Cao, In-situ observation of the domain configurations during the phase transitions in barium titanate, Philosophical Magazine B 74 (1996) 25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418639608240325

    1996 doi

  90. [98]

    Little, Dynamic behavior of domain walls in barium titanate, Phys

    E.A. Little, Dynamic behavior of domain walls in barium titanate, Phys. Rev. 98, 978 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.98.978

    1955 doi

  91. [99]

    McQuarrie, Role of domain processes in polycrystalline barium titanate, J

    M. McQuarrie, Role of domain processes in polycrystalline barium titanate, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 39 (1956) 54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1956.tb15623.x

    1956

  92. [100]

    Marton, I

    P. Marton, I. Rychetsky, and J. Hlinka, Domain walls of ferroelectric BaTiO 3 within the Ginzburg -Landau-Devonshire phenomenological model, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 114125. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144125

    2010 doi

  93. [101]

    Kiselev, T.S

    D.A. Kiselev, T.S. Ilina, M.D. Malinkovich, O.N. Sergeeva, N.N. Bolshakova, E.M. Semenova, and Y.V. Kuznetsova, Specific features of the domain structure of BaTiO3 crystals during thermal heating and cooling, Physics of the Solid State 60 (2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    Nambu and D.A

    S. Nambu and D.A. Sagala: Domain formation and elastic long -range interaction in ferroelectric perovskites, Phys. Rev.B 50 (1994) 5838. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5838 53

    1994 doi

  95. [103]

    Zhang and K

    W. Zhang and K. Bhattachatya: A computational model of ferroelectric domains. Part I: model formulation and domain switching, Acta Mater. 53 (2005) 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.016

    2005 doi

  96. [104]

    Zhang and K

    W. Zhang and K. Bhattachatya: A computational model of ferroelectric domains. Part II: grain boundaries and defect pinning, Acta Mater. 53 (2005) 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.015

    2005 doi

  97. [105]

    Mazur, K

    O. Mazur, K. Tozaki, Y. Yoshimura, a nd L. Stefanovich, Influence of pressure on the kinetics of ferroelectric phase transition in BaTiO3, Physica A 599 (2022) 127436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127436

    2022

  98. [106]

    Genenko, R

    Y.A. Genenko, R. Khac haturyan, J. Schultheiß, A. Ossipov, J.E. Daniels, and J. Koruza, Stochastic multistep polarization switching in ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 144101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.144101

    2018 doi

  99. [107]

    Schultheiß, L

    J. Schultheiß, L. Liu, H. Kungl, M. Weber, L. Kodumudi Venkataraman, S. Checchia, D. Damjanovic, J.E. Daniels, and J. Koruza, Revealing the sequence of switching mechanisms in polycrystalline ferroelectric/ferroelastic materials, Acta Mater. 157 (2018) 355. https://doi.org/10....

    2018 doi

  100. [108]

    Genenko, R

    Y.A. Genenko, R. Khachaturyan, I.S. Vorotiahin, J. Schultheiß, J.E. Daniels, A. Grünebohm, and J. Koruza, Multistep stochas tic mechanism of polarization reversal in rhombohedral ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 064107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.064107

    2020 doi

  101. [109]

    Genenko, M.-H

    Y.A. Genenko, M.-H. Zhang, I.S. Vorotiahin, R. K hachaturyan, Y.-X. Liu, J.-W. Li, K. Wang, and J. Koruza, Multistep stochastic mechanism of polarization reversal in orthorhombic ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 184106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.184106

    2021 doi

  102. [738]

    https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783418040157

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.