Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 41 references

NOFT: Test-Time Noise Finetune via Information Bottleneck for Highly Correlated Asset Creation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read NOFT fine-tunes the noise latent of a frozen diffusion model to generate highly correlated yet diverse 2D and 3D assets, using only about 14K trainable parameters and roughly 10 minutes of training.

desk verdict A promising plug-and-play noise-editing idea whose central transfer mechanism is missing from its own equations — worth a serious revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12235 v1 pith:ULUSVDVV submitted 2025-05-18 cs.CV

Jia Li , Nan Gao , Huaibo Huang , Ran He This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords noisefinetuneinformationbottleneckSinkhornoptimaltransportdiffusionmodelcontrollablegenerationassetcreation2Dand3D
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the initial Gaussian noise of a diffusion model is not random after all: it implicitly carries the topological and textural manifold of the image to be generated. The authors introduce NOFT, a plug-and-play module that fine-tunes this noise at test time through an optimal-transported information bottleneck, trading off content preservation against diversity without any external control signals or fine-tuning of the base generator. A sympathetic reader should care because it suggests a general, lightweight way to reimagine assets across 2D image and 3D model generators, using the noise itself as the control surface.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Optimal-Transported Information Bottleneck (OTIB) module, which combines a Sinkhorn-Attention (doubly-stochastic attention derived from optimal transport) with a noise-level information bottleneck filter λ. The bottleneck mixes the source noise with a random Gaussian noise via Z = λR + (1−λ)ε, where λ is learned, and the Sinkhorn attention provides spatially aware transport that preserves local structure and appearance. This module operates entirely on noise tensors, so it can be plugged into frozen 2D latent diffusion and 3D structured latent generators without altering their forward or denoising processes.

What would settle it

Run a controlled experiment where the diversity noise's spatial layout is scrambled (e.g., permute its patches or reverse its channels) and observe whether NOFT still transfers the local object parts, such as the head of a cat in a cat-shaped cake. If local topology transfer persists despite scrambling, the claim that noise locally encodes image topology is weakened; if it breaks, the claim is supported. Additionally, compare NOFT against a variant with the Sinkhorn attention removed while keeping the same bottleneck—if the local structure fidelity metrics (DINO self-similarity, DINO-I) do not drop, the Sinkhorn attention's role in contextual preservation is disconfirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the contextual information needed to control structure and appearance already lives inside the noise latent of a pre-trained diffusion model, and that a small trained perturbation of that noise—rather than an explicit adapter, feature manipulation, or model fine-tuning—can produce images that preserve the global content of the source while visibly varying its local topology and texture. NOFT learns this perturbation by compressing the source noise and injecting information from a second diversity noise, guided by an information bottleneck and a Sinkhorn-optimal-transport attention module, trained with a pixel-level reconstruction loss and a manifold-level KL compression loss.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that simply mixing noise values at matching positions between the source and diversity noises, without aligning their spatial structure, is enough to transfer the local topological character of the diversity image into the generated output; if this per-location mixing does not actually carry local structure, the central claim of topology-preserving variation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, any pre-trained diffusion generator could be equipped with a lightweight noise-fineting module to produce content-faithful variations, removing the need for control signals such as Canny edges, depth maps, or reference-image adapters.
  • The approach extends beyond 2D images to 3D asset generation, as demonstrated by applying NOFT to the structured latent space of TRELLIS, suggesting that noise-level editing is a generator-agnostic interface.
  • The trade-off weight β directly controls the degree of diversity, giving practitioners a single knob to balance content preservation against variation, from mild tweaks to substantial structural and semantic changes.
  • Because NOFT trains on random noise pairs alone, it could be adapted to new generators or domains with minimal data and compute, potentially enabling fast on-the-fly customization for asset pipelines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to apply NOFT's noise-mixing operation to other generative models with compressed latents (e.g., autoregressive image models or video diffusion) and measure whether the same topology-transfer effect appears, which would support the paper's stronger claim that noise latents universally encode scene manifolds.
  • The method implicitly assumes that the local spatial statistics of a noise patch correspond to local image features; one could isolate this by ablating the spatial order of the diversity noise (e.g., shuffling patches) and checking whether local structure transfer degrades, which the paper does not explicitly test.
  • If noise finetuning is indeed a sufficient control surface, it suggests a new class of lightweight personalization tools that operate before generation rather than during it, possibly enabling real-time interactive asset editing on consumer hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes NOFT, a plug-and-play module that fine-tunes the initial noise latent of a frozen diffusion model. The module combines a Sinkhorn Attention (FSA) and an information bottleneck (IB) to mix a source noise NOrig with a diversity noise NDiv, aiming to preserve the structure and appearance of the source image while injecting diversity. The method is evaluated on 2D and 3D asset generation, compared against several baseline control methods, and claims to transfer the local topological statistics of the second noise's image into the generated image. The paper reports strong qualitative results, quantitative metrics in Table 1, and a small user study.

Significance. If the claims were fully supported, NOFT would be a significant lightweight contribution: a 14K-parameter, 10-minute test-time module that controls content-diversity trade-offs without external control signals or model fine-tuning. The paper has strengths: it addresses an interesting and timely problem, provides extensive qualitative comparisons across multiple architectures, and the modular design is clean. However, the central theoretical derivation is incomplete: the IB objective of Eq. (4) is reduced in Eq. (10) to a KL regularizer without the task-relevant term, and the objective contains no mechanism that rewards transferring topology from NDiv. The reported quantitative evaluation lacks error bars and statistical tests, and no code is provided. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2.1, Eq. (10) vs Eq. (4)] The information bottleneck objective introduced in Eq. (4) is max_Z I(Y;Z) − βI(X;Z). In Section 4.2.1, Eq. (10) replaces this with min_Z βI(R;Z), thereby dropping the task-relevant term I(Y;Z). The actual loss used in training, Eq. (17) with Eq. (18), is therefore only a KL-divergence regularizer that pushes the representation toward a standard Gaussian. It is not an information bottleneck in the sense of Eq. (4). This undermines the central claim that NOFT realizes an "optimal-transported information bottleneck" for content-diversity trade-off. Please justify the omission of I(Y;Z) or rename the module to reflect what is actually optimized.
  2. [§4.2.1, Eq. (11) and Eq. (9)] The claimed transfer of "local topological statistic from I2" has no mechanism in the objective. In Eq. (11), Z = λR + (1−λ)ε, where ε is the diversity noise NDiv. Since NDiv is an i.i.d. Gaussian field (standard diffusion noise), a per-location linear combination of two independent Gaussian fields is statistically just another Gaussian field; it does not inherit spatial structure from NDiv. The Sinkhorn Attention FSA in Eq. (9) operates on NOrig alone (as NOrig + FSA(NOrig)), so there is no cross-noise alignment between NOrig and NDiv. The training losses in Eqs. (15), (17), and (18) contain no term that rewards or measures information from NDiv. The ablation in Figure 7(a) shows only that FSA reshapes the source noise; it does not establish that NDiv's spatial pattern is transferred. As written, the observed diversity is explainable as ordinary stochastic perturbation around NOrig. Please provide a derivation or a controlled experiment isolating the transfer mechanism.
  3. [Table 1 and user study] The quantitative comparison in Table 1 reports single-run numbers with no error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests. The claimed superiority on self-sim (0.038 vs. 0.045) and DINO-I (0.841 vs. 0.753) could be within run-to-run noise. The user study uses only 10 users with 20 samples per method, and no inter-subject agreement or test-retest reliability is reported. Without statistical grounding, the claim of "consistent superiority" is not substantiated. Please report variance across multiple seeds/runs, perform significance tests, and release code and data to support reproducibility.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3) and Eq. (15)] There is a typo in Eq. (3): "NOirg" should be "NOrig". In Eq. (15), the target is written as XOrig but should be NOrig based on the context.
  2. [Eq. (16) and Eq. (17)] The notation "log(1−λ)^2" is ambiguous; it should be written as log((1−λ)^2) to avoid confusion with (log(1−λ))^2.
  3. [Eq. (14) and Algorithm 2] The Sinkhorn scalars α and β in Eq. (14) are not explicitly defined in terms of the iterative normalization steps of Algorithm 2; please clarify the connection between the transport plan formula and the algorithm.
  4. [§5, user study] The user study is described as involving only 10 users; please report a power analysis or inter-subject agreement to justify the sample size.
  5. [Figure 7] The L1 values in Figure 7 are not defined in the main text; please specify what L1 measures and how it is computed to allow comparison with Table 1.
  6. [§4.1.1, Eq. (7)] The statement that NOFT "completely decouples" from external control signals is overstated for the referenced variant, which explicitly uses IP-Adapter features and diffusion inversion of IRef.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: losses are self-supervised, beta is a user-set knob, and the only overlapping-author citation [31] is not load-bearing; the main weakness is an unsupported transfer premise, not circularity.

full rationale

NOFT's training objective (Eqs. 3, 15, 17, 18) is self-supervised on noise reconstruction and KL compression; it does not use any of the Table 1 evaluation metrics (self-sim, DINO-I, L1) as training signals. The trade-off weight beta is a user-set knob rather than a fitted parameter, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The only self-citation with overlapping authors is [31] (Gao, Huang, Fu, Li, He), which appears in the related-work sentence 'IBA [16,31] polishes the attribution information based on KL divergence'; however, the reparameterization in Eq. 11 is attributed to [16], and the KL loss in Eq. 17 follows from the stated Gaussian assumption rather than from [31]. Thus the self-citation is not load-bearing. The paper's central claim that NDiv's 'local topological statistic' is transferred is not derived from the objective: Eq. 10 drops the I(Y;Z) term, and no loss term rewards transfer from NDiv. But this is an unsupported premise or missing mechanism, not a circular reduction, because NNOFT is not defined in terms of the claimed topology-transfer outcome, and the empirical comparisons against external baselines give the central claim independent content. Accordingly, under the rubric this paper receives a minor-self-citation score of 2 rather than a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical or mathematical entities. It relies on several domain assumptions about diffusion noise latents and on a beta-regularizer that is loosely called an information bottleneck. The central free parameter is beta, chosen by hand; the architecture of the lambda-network is unspecified.

free parameters (1)
  • beta (content-diversity tradeoff weight) = 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 (set by hand per setting)
    Controls how much of the diversity noise leaks into the output; higher beta gives more diversity but less fidelity. The paper sets it manually for mild, substantial, or reference-constrained variation (Section 5), and it directly sets the information-bottleneck strength in Eq. 18.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gaussian noise latents in pre-trained diffusion models implicitly encode the topological and textural manifold of the generated image.
    Stated in Section 1 and Fig. 2, it is the conceptual foundation of the method. It is not proven and is the justification for operating on noise rather than on features.
  • domain assumption A module trained on random Gaussian noise pairs transfers to inverted real-image latents and to different architectures and checkpoints.
    Section 5 Training Protocol trains only on random noise tensors of a given shape; test-time use involves inversion latents (NOFT_2D_Ref) and 3D latents (TRELLIS). No cross-domain validation is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The information bottleneck objective can be reduced to a KL divergence against N(0,1) after dropping the task-relevant term I(Y;Z).
    Eq. 10 minimizes only beta I(R;Z), discarding the I(Y;Z) term from Eq. 4. This makes the 'bottleneck' a beta-VAE-style regularizer on noise rather than a full IB objective.
  • domain assumption The Sinkhorn attention provides contextual preservation by producing a doubly-stochastic transport plan on noise features.
    The paper claims this improves quality (Section 4.2.2, ablation Fig. 7) but does not analyze why doubly-stochastic attention on noise latents preserves content.
  • ad hoc to paper The diversity noise NDiv is an i.i.d. Gaussian sample whose local structure transfers to the generated image through the mixing in Eq. 11.
    This is the weakest assumption; the equation provides no alignment between NOrig and NDiv, so the mechanism of local topology transfer is unspecified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NOFT: Test-Time Noise Finetune via Information Bottleneck for Highly Correlated Asset Creation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULUSVDVV

@misc{pith2026250512235,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NOFT: Test-Time Noise Finetune via Information Bottleneck for Highly Correlated Asset Creation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULUSVDVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12235}
}
read the original abstract

The diffusion model has provided a strong tool for implementing text-to-image (T2I) and image-to-image (I2I) generation. Recently, topology and texture control are popular explorations, e.g., ControlNet, IP-Adapter, Ctrl-X, and DSG. These methods explicitly consider high-fidelity controllable editing based on external signals or diffusion feature manipulations. As for diversity, they directly choose different noise latents. However, the diffused noise is capable of implicitly representing the topological and textural manifold of the corresponding image. Moreover, it's an effective workbench to conduct the trade-off between content preservation and controllable variations. Previous T2I and I2I diffusion works do not explore the information within the compressed contextual latent. In this paper, we first propose a plug-and-play noise finetune NOFT module employed by Stable Diffusion to generate highly correlated and diverse images. We fine-tune seed noise or inverse noise through an optimal-transported (OT) information bottleneck (IB) with around only 14K trainable parameters and 10 minutes of training. Our test-time NOFT is good at producing high-fidelity image variations considering topology and texture alignments. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that NOFT is a powerful general reimagine approach to efficiently fine-tune the 2D/3D AIGC assets with text or image guidance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12235 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our method noise finetune (NOFT) completely decouples highly correlated manifold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Content-diversity tradeoff: given two distinguished noises, we obtain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Feature workbench provided by DSG [10] is fine-grained but cumbersome. Our NOFT gives another efficient and diverse workbench to change the properties of objects. 2 Related work We briefly introduce diffusion control methods, diffusion seed implementation, and information compression works in this section. Diffusion control. On one hand, pre-trained T2I foundational models [6] are potentially able to generate divers… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Method overview: as a plug-and-play content controller, NOFT can be employed for 2D/3D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results of NOFT_2D, ControlNet + IP Adapter [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative results of NOFT_2D_Ref, ControlNet [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) NOFT variants show that methods w/ SA preserve better appearance statistics than those [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: NOFT helps diffusion model to realize content-diversity tradeoff where the girl exhibits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The first stage based on NOFT_2D of the NOFT_3D_Img in Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: NOFT effectively controls the structure and appearance of the content. Smaller tradeoff [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Substantial diversity visualization where the queen and cheetahs have various structures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Image variants of the teaser figure 1 under magnified observation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: More qualitative results of NOFT_3D based on TRELLIS [8]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Additional visual results of NOFT_2D based on SD3 [7]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Additional visual results of NOFT_2D based on SD3 [7]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Additional visual results of NOFT_2D based on SD3 [7]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Qualitative results of NOFT_2D_Ref, ControlNet [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Qualitative results of NOFT_2D_Ref, ControlNet [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: (a) Additional qualitative results of NOFT_2D_Ref, ControlNet [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Information bottleneck disentanglement for identity swapping,

    G. Gao, H. Huang, C. Fu, Z. Li, and R. He, “Information bottleneck disentanglement for identity swapping,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2021, pp. 3404–3413

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to-image generation using textual inversion,

    R. Gal, Y . Alaluf, Y . Atzmon, O. Patashnik, A. H. Bermano, G. Chechik, and D. Cohen-Or, “An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to-image generation using textual inversion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to- image diffusion models for subject-driven generation,

    N. Ruiz, Y . Li, V . Jampani, Y . Pritch, M. Rubinstein, and K. Aberman, “Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to- image diffusion models for subject-driven generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 22 500–22 510

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,

    L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala, “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” in ICCV, 2023

    2023

  5. [4]

    Uni-controlnet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models,

    S. Zhao, D. Chen, Y .-C. Chen, J. Bao, S. Hao, L. Yuan, and K.-Y . K. Wong, “Uni-controlnet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models,

    H. Ye, J. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Han, and W. Yang, “Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models,” arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  7. [6]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  8. [7]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis,

    P. Esser, S. Kulal, A. Blattmann, R. Entezari, J. Müller, H. Saini, Y . Levi, D. Lorenz, A. Sauer, F. Boesel et al., “Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis,” in Forty-first international conference on machine learning, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Structured 3d latents for scalable and versatile 3d generation,

    J. Xiang, Z. Lv, S. Xu, Y . Deng, R. Wang, B. Zhang, D. Chen, X. Tong, and J. Yang, “Structured 3d latents for scalable and versatile 3d generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    Ctrl-x: Controlling structure and appearance for text-to-image generation without guidance,

    K. Lin, S. Mo, B. Klingher, F. Mu, and B. Zhou, “Ctrl-x: Controlling structure and appearance for text-to-image generation without guidance,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Diffusion self-guidance for controllable image generation,

    D. Epstein, A. Jabri, B. Poole, A. A. Efros, and A. Holynski, “Diffusion self-guidance for controllable image generation,” in NeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  4. [11]

    Freecontrol: Training-free spatial control of any text-to-image diffusion model with any condition,

    S. Mo, F. Mu, K. H. Lin, Y . Liu, B. Guan, Y . Li, and B. Zhou, “Freecontrol: Training-free spatial control of any text-to-image diffusion model with any condition,” inCVPR, 2024

    2024

  5. [12]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models,

    C. Mou, X. Wang, L. Xie, J. Zhang, Z. Qi, Y . Shan, and X. Qie, “T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models,” in AAAI, 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Hyperdreambooth: Hypernetworks for fast personalization of text-to-image models,

    N. Ruiz, Y . Li, V . Jampani, W. Wei, T. Hou, Y . Pritch, N. Wadhwa, M. Rubinstein, and K. Aberman, “Hyperdreambooth: Hypernetworks for fast personalization of text-to-image models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp...

    2024

  7. [14]

    Inference-time scaling for diffusion models beyond scaling denoising steps,

    N. Ma, S. Tong, H. Jia, H. Hu, Y .-C. Su, M. Zhang, X. Yang, Y . Li, T. Jaakkola, X. Jiaet al., “Inference-time scaling for diffusion models beyond scaling denoising steps,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09732, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle,

    N. Tishby and N. Zaslavsky, “Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle,” in 2015 ieee information theory workshop (itw). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–5

    2015

  9. [16]

    Restricting the flow: Information bottlenecks for attribution,

    K. Schulz, L. Sixt, F. Tombari, and T. Landgraf, “Restricting the flow: Information bottlenecks for attribution,” in ICLR, 2020

    2020

  10. [17]

    Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport,

    M. Cuturi, “Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 26, 2013

    2013

  11. [18]

    Otseg: Multi-prompt sinkhorn attention for zero-shot semantic segmentation,

    K. Kim, Y . Oh, and J. C. Ye, “Otseg: Multi-prompt sinkhorn attention for zero-shot semantic segmentation,” in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 200–217

    2024

  12. [19]

    Layoutdiffusion: Controllable diffusion model for layout-to-image generation,

    G. Zheng, X. Zhou, X. Li, Z. Qi, Y . Shan, and X. Li, “Layoutdiffusion: Controllable diffusion model for layout-to-image generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 22 490–22 499

    2023

  13. [20]

    Instancediffusion: Instance-level control for image generation,

    X. Wang, T. Darrell, S. S. Rambhatla, R. Girdhar, and I. Misra, “Instancediffusion: Instance-level control for image generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 6232–6242. 10

    2024

  14. [21]

    Migc: Multi-instance generation controller for text-to-image synthesis,

    D. Zhou, Y . Li, F. Ma, X. Zhang, and Y . Yang, “Migc: Multi-instance generation controller for text-to-image synthesis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 6818–6828

    2024

  15. [22]

    Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation,

    Y . Li, H. Liu, Q. Wu, F. Mu, J. Yang, J. Gao, C. Li, and Y . J. Lee, “Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 22 511–22 521

    2023

  16. [23]

    Reco: Region- controlled text-to-image generation,

    Z. Yang, J. Wang, Z. Gan, L. Li, K. Lin, C. Wu, N. Duan, Z. Liu, C. Liu, M. Zenget al., “Reco: Region- controlled text-to-image generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 14 246–14 255

    2023

  17. [24]

    Spatext: Spatio-textual representation for controllable image generation,

    O. Avrahami, T. Hayes, O. Gafni, S. Gupta, Y . Taigman, D. Parikh, D. Lischinski, O. Fried, and X. Yin, “Spatext: Spatio-textual representation for controllable image generation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 18...

    2023

  18. [25]

    Break-a-scene: Extracting multiple concepts from a single image,

    O. Avrahami, K. Aberman, O. Fried, D. Cohen-Or, and D. Lischinski, “Break-a-scene: Extracting multiple concepts from a single image,” in SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, 2023, pp. 1–12

    2023

  19. [26]

    Orthogonal adaptation for modular customization of diffusion models,

    R. Po, G. Yang, K. Aberman, and G. Wetzstein, “Orthogonal adaptation for modular customization of diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 7964–7973

    2024

  20. [27]

    Text-to-image rectified flow as plug-and-play priors,

    X. Yang, C. Cheng, X. Yang, F. Liu, and G. Lin, “Text-to-image rectified flow as plug-and-play priors,” in The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=SzPZK856iI

    2025

  21. [28]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models,

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

    2020

  22. [29]

    Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models,

    R. Mokady, A. Hertz, K. Aberman, Y . Pritch, and D. Cohen-Or, “Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 6038–6047

    2023

  23. [30]

    Deep variational information bottleneck,

    A. A. Alemi, I. Fischer, J. V . Dillon, and K. Murphy, “Deep variational information bottleneck,”ICLR, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems,

    I. Csiszár, “I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems,”The annals of probability, pp. 146–158, 1975

    1975

  25. [33]

    The information bottleneck method,

    N. Tishby, F. C. Pereira, and W. Bialek, “The information bottleneck method,” arXiv preprint physics/0004057, 2000

    2000 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,

    P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,”Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,

    B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, and et al., “Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    B. Kerbl, G. Kopanas, T. Leimkühler, and G. Drettakis, “3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 139–1, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering,

    T. Lu, M. Yu, L. Xu, Y . Xiangli, L. Wang, D. Lin, and B. Dai, “Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 20 654–20 664

    2024

  30. [38]

    Clipdrop reimagine,

    S. AI, “Clipdrop reimagine,” Web Service, 2023, aI-powered image regeneration tool. [Online]. Available: https://clipdrop.co/reimagine

    2023

  31. [39]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis,

    D. Podell, Z. English, K. Lacey, A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, J. Müller, J. Penna, and R. Rombach, “Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Splicing vit features for semantic appearance transfer,

    N. Tumanyan, O. Bar-Tal, S. Bagon, and T. Dekel, “Splicing vit features for semantic appearance transfer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 10 748–10 757. 11 A Additional results In this section, we provide additi...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.