Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Exponential enhancement of sensitivity in Ramsey interferometry with optically thick ensemble of atoms

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in an optically thick, inhomogeneously broadened two-level medium, the Ramsey resonance narrows exponentially with optical depth, giving frequency-estimation variance δΔ² = 4e^{-αL}/τ² and reaching the…

desk verdict Line narrowing with optical depth looks real, but the exponential sensitivity claim rests on a Fisher information formula that doesn't match a shot-noise-limited population measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13146 v1 pith:ZTSFLEMG submitted 2025-05-19 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

S.A. Moiseev , K.I. Gerasimov , M.M. Minnegaliev , I.V. Brekotkin , E.S. Moiseev This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords Ramseyinterferometryopticaldepthphotonechoinhomogeneousbroadeningself-inducedtransparencyCramér–Raoboundsolid-stateclockerbium-dopedcrystal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Ramsey interferometry, usually run in optically dilute samples, works even better in optically thick ones: as light penetrates a resonantly absorbing medium, a cascade of photon echoes keeps the total pulse area near π, and the population response to detuning develops a central Ramsey fringe whose width shrinks exponentially with optical depth. The authors derive a Cramér–Rao bound of δΔ² = $4e^{{-αL}}$/τ² for frequency estimation at line center, stating that the homogeneous-broadening limit can be reached. They confirm the mechanism experimentally with ¹⁶⁷Er³⁺:Y₂SiO₅, reporting more than 2.4-fold narrowing as optical depth rises from 0.8 to 3.8. If correct, the effect turns optical depth from a nuisance into a resource for clocks and high-resolution spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

The cascade of photon echoes generated by the two input pulses, tracked with the pulse-area theorem ∂Θ/∂z = −(α/2) sin Θ and a generalized pulse-area method, is the central mechanism; it explains why the total pulse area stays near π deep in the medium. The inverse-scattering solution of the Maxwell–Bloch equations supplies the population formula, and the Fisher information (4) turns the narrowed line shape into the exponential Cramér–Rao bound (5). The echoes are the spectral manifestation of self-induced transparency: they form a field deep inside the sample whose frequency components are much narrower than the inhomogeneous line.

What would settle it

Measure the frequency stability (Allan deviation) of a Ramsey clock on an optically thick ¹⁶⁷Er³⁺:Y₂SiO₅ sample at fixed pulse delay τ while tuning optical depth from 0.8 to 3.8; if the variance of frequency estimates does not scale as $e^{{-αL}}$/τ² under shot-noise-limited readout, the claimed exponential precision enhancement is falsified even if the fringes narrow. Equivalently, recompute the Cramér–Rao bound with the full Poisson likelihood for population measurements and check whether it yields the exponential factor at Δ = 0.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the back-action of an inhomogeneously broadened two-level medium on the Ramsey π/2 pulses does not wash out the fringes but creates a cascade of photon echoes that re-excite atoms as the pulses propagate, keeping the total pulse area near π over long distances. The inverse-scattering solution gives the excited-state population $$P(\$\Delta$,z,t)\simeq $e^{{-t/T_1}}$P(\$\Delta$,0,t_{\rm lim})\frac{$e^{{-\alpha z}}$}{1-P(\$\Delta$,0,t_{\rm lim})(1-$e^{{-\alpha z}}$)},$$ and the Fisher information at line center converts this into the Cramér–Rao bound $$\delta\$\Delta$^2=\frac{$4e^{{-\alpha L}}$}{\$tau^{2}$}.$$ The width of the central Ramsey fringe therefore shrinks exponentially with optical depth αL while the fringe amplitude is preserved, and the paper reports more than 2.4-fold narrowing in ¹⁶⁷Er³⁺:Y₂SiO₅ as αL goes from 0.8 to 3.8.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the measurement error is described by the curvature of the deterministic signal peak and that the atomic medium remains a uniform continuum at every optical depth; if the readout is instead limited by shot noise from counting excited atoms, the exponential precision gain does not follow automatically from the narrower fringes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At optical depth αL = 10, Eq. (5) predicts a 148-fold reduction in Ramsey linewidth relative to the optically thin case, so thick ensembles become a direct lever on clock precision.
  • Solid-state clocks based on nuclear transitions, such as ²²⁹ᵐTh in CaF₂, could in principle reach homogeneous-linewidth-limited precision because their ratio of inhomogeneous to homogeneous broadening resembles the conditions demonstrated here.
  • The effect provides a way to extract and detect ultra-narrow spectral lines hidden inside a broad inhomogeneous profile, which is useful for high-resolution spectroscopy of resonant media.
  • Placing the medium inside a high-Q resonator could multiply the effective optical depth and amplify the exponential gain, although the theory and experiment would need substantial extension.
  • At very high optical depth the predicted narrowed line may contain fewer than one atom on average, signalling that the continuum Maxwell–Bloch model would need generalization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the line narrowing is real, the medium's own echo cascade acts like a distributed multipass resonator, so the exponential gain might be obtainable without an external cavity.
  • The Fisher information in Eq. (4) is the curvature of a deterministic signal; under shot-noise-limited population counting the standard Fisher information (∂P/∂Δ)²/[P(1−P)] vanishes at line center, so whether the exponential precision bound survives realistic noise is a question the paper does not settle.
  • A direct test would be to measure the Allan deviation of a frequency standard built on an optically thick ensemble at fixed τ while varying αL, separating actual sensitivity gain from line-shape narrowing.
  • The mechanism suggests that deliberately shaping the input pulse areas to maximise the echo cascade could further sharpen the central fringe, a parameter search the current experiments only begin to explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Ramsey interferometry in an optically thick, inhomogeneously broadened two-level medium. Using a pulse-area and inverse-scattering solution of the Maxwell-Bloch equations, the authors derive an expression for the excited-state population as a function of detuning and optical depth [Eq. (2)] and from it a claimed Cramér-Rao bound [Eq. (5)] according to which the variance of a frequency estimate scales as 4 exp(-alpha L)/tau^2. The experimental part on 167Er3+:Y2SiO5 observes a primary echo and three subsequent echoes, and reports more than 2.4-fold narrowing of the central Ramsey fringe as the optical depth is increased from 0.8 to 3.8. The observed width and excitation probability are compared with the theory, with reasonable agreement after accounting for the Gaussian beam profile. The paper interprets the effect as a nonlinear interference of multiple echoes and discusses implications for solid-state clocks.

Significance. The line-narrowing effect is significant and would be of interest to the quantum optics and precision spectroscopy communities if it holds up, as it challenges the usual assumption that optically thick samples are detrimental to Ramsey interrogation. The theoretical scaling is essentially parameter-free, with the input pulse area as the only control parameter and the optical depth measured independently, and the predicted narrowing is a falsifiable experimental signature. The authors also honestly flag the breakdown of the continuum model at high optical depth, where the line may contain fewer than one atom. However, the more ambitious claim of exponential enhancement of frequency sensitivity is not supported by the analysis as written, because the Fisher information in Eq. (4) does not correspond to the physical measurement noise model. The paper is best viewed at present as a demonstration of exponential line narrowing rather than a proven sensitivity enhancement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (4)-(5)] The Fisher information used to arrive at Eq. (5) is not the Fisher information for the population measurement described in the paper. For a binomial (shot-noise-limited) measurement on N atoms, I(Delta)=N (dP/dDelta)^2/[P(1-P)], which vanishes at line center because dP/dDelta=0 there; for an additive Gaussian measurement of the population with constant variance, I(Delta)=(dP/dDelta)^2/sigma^2, which also vanishes at line center. The curvature expression -d^2/dDelta^2 log P in Eq. (4) is not the Fisher information for any standard measurement noise model, so Eq. (5) cannot be presented as a Cramér-Rao bound on frequency estimation. Moreover, expanding Eq. (2) near Delta=0 for Theta0=pi/2 gives a line-center curvature of (tau^2/2) exp(alpha L), i.e., a prefactor of 2 rather than 4 in the inverse; the numerical factor in Eq. (5) is not transparent. The authors should derive the Fisher information for their actual detection scheme and noise statistics, or explicitly restrict the claim to linewidth narrowing.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 3] The experiment measures spectral linewidths and excitation probabilities, but it does not characterize the detection noise, repeatability, or the variance of a frequency estimate. Line narrowing alone does not guarantee improved sensitivity, since a narrower line with lower signal amplitude or higher noise per point may not improve the estimation precision. The 2.4-fold narrowing is an interesting spectroscopic observation, but it does not by itself support the title's claim of 'exponential enhancement of sensitivity'. A direct measurement of frequency-estimation variance, or at least a quantitative noise model with measured parameters, is needed to validate the sensitivity claim.
  3. [Section IV, Discussion] The authors state that at high optical depth the continuum Maxwell-Bloch model may become invalid and the Ramsey line may contain less than one atom. This acknowledged limitation undercuts the quantitative extrapolation of Eq. (5) to, e.g., a claimed 148-fold linewidth reduction at alpha L=10. The tested optical-depth range (0.8 to 3.8) is modest, and the exponential dependence of the precision bound is not directly verified. The manuscript should state a domain of validity for Eq. (5) and refrain from quantitative predictions outside that domain, or provide evidence that the model remains valid in the extrapolated regime.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] 'In contrast to later belief' should read 'In contrast to the latter belief' or similar.
  2. [Section II, after Eq. (3)] The assumption of a homogeneous beam profile is stated without noting that it is relaxed in the experimental comparison; please flag this at first mention.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 3 references] The panel references do not match the Fig. 3 caption; for example, the width-versus-optical-depth dependence is in panel (c), but the text refers to it as part of Fig. 3 (a,b), and the amplitude dependence is discussed as Fig. 3 (c) although the caption places it in panel (d). Please align the references.
  4. [Reference [37]] Reference [37] is cited as 'Beer' only; the full Beer-Lambert law citation should be given.
  5. [Section III and IV] There are several grammatical slips, e.g., 'multi pulse radiation' and 'optically depth medium'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  6. [Eq. (2)] The main text should state the assumptions under which the inverse-scattering solution is valid (homogeneous beam profile, two-level atoms, negligible phase relaxation during the pulses, etc.), since all subsequent results depend on this expression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exponential line narrowing and the Cramer-Rao bound both follow from the same Maxwell-Bloch/inverse-scattering solution, not from fitting; the nonstandard Fisher-information expression is a correctness caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (2) for the excited-state population P(Δ,z,t) is obtained from the Maxwell-Bloch equations via the inverse scattering method, with the independent 1974 reference [35] as the mathematical basis. The exponential narrowing of the Ramsey resonance and the claimed precision bound Eq. (5) are both algebraic consequences of applying Eq. (4) to the same theoretical P; neither quantity is fitted to the experimental linewidth data. The input pulse area Θ0 is an experimental control parameter, and the optical depth αL is independently measured, so there is no fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. The self-citation [34] (Moiseev, Sabooni, and Urmancheev, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 012026 (2020)) is used only to model the pulse areas of the generated echo signals in Fig. 2 and to illustrate the echo-cascade mechanism; it is not the source of the main probability formula or of the quantitative comparison with experiment. The main caveat is a correctness/validity issue rather than circularity: Eq. (4) defines Fisher information as −∂² log P/∂Δ², which is not the standard Fisher information for a binomial population measurement (which is (∂P/∂Δ)²/[P(1−P)] and vanishes at line center). If the detection noise is shot-noise limited, the exponential sensitivity claim would need an explicit noise model and does not follow merely from line narrowing. This concern belongs under correctness risk, not under circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses standard semiclassical laser physics and an inverse-scattering solution; no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The only free input is the experimentally controlled pulse area.

free parameters (1)
  • Input pulse area Θ0 = 0.48π
    Experimental control parameter; theoretical curves use Θ0 = 0.48π and 0.5π. The exponential scaling does not depend on the exact value, but quantitative comparison does.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The atom-light interaction is described by the semiclassical Maxwell-Bloch equations.
    Used in Section II; the basis for the pulse area theorem and inverse-scattering solution.
  • domain assumption The atomic transition is inhomogeneously broadened with form factor G(Δ/Δinh), and homogeneous broadening γ is much smaller than the inhomogeneous width.
    This is the experimental regime and appears in the derivation of Eq. (2).
  • standard math The inverse scattering method yields the exact solution of the Maxwell-Bloch equations for the two-pulse sequence.
    Used to obtain Eq. (2); detailed derivation is in Supplement B, not included in the main text.
  • domain assumption Dephasing and decay times T1, T2 are much longer than the pulse durations and delay τ, so relaxation is ignored during pulse interaction.
    The paper states T2 ≫ δt1,2, τ and uses a single e^{-t/T1} factor; this is standard for Ramsey experiments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponential enhancement of sensitivity in Ramsey interferometry with optically thick ensemble of atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZTSFLEMG

@misc{pith2026250513146,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponential enhancement of sensitivity in Ramsey interferometry with optically thick ensemble of atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZTSFLEMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13146}
}
abstract

Ramsey interferometry is a cornerstone technique for precise measurement of time and frequency in modern clocks. The Ramsey experiments are typically done in optically dilute samples of atoms to improve homogeneity and avoid back-action of atoms on excitation pulses. In contrast to later belief, we predict and experimentally show that in optically thick samples with inhomogeneous broadening of resonant transition, the back-action can lead to the highly enhanced narrowing of Ramsey resonance. The linewidth narrowing and corresponding precision of the frequency measurement scale exponentially with an increase in optical depth of a sample and can reach the limits set by homogeneous broadening. We show that this effect is caused by a nonlinear interference of multiple echoes formed inside the atomic medium, which is experimentally confirmed with $^{167}\text{Er}^{3+}$ ions in $\text{Y}_2\text{SiO}_5$ crystal. Our findings open new opportunities for nonlinear high-resolution spectroscopy of resonant media and sensitivity enhancement in a new generation of solid state clocks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13146 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Simplified sketch of ortogonal spatial scheme of ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. , which clearly shows more than 2.4-fold narrow￾ing of Ramsey resonance with an increase of the optical depth. A comparison of the experimental and theoretical data of the width of the central peak of the fringes δν = δωR/2π and excitation probability (2) of atoms Pbb(0, αL, t) are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. F. Ramsey, A new molecular beam resonance method, Phys. Rev. 76, 996 (1949)

    work page 1949

  2. [2]

    N. F. Ramsey, Resonance experiments in successive os- cillatory fields, Review of Scientific Instruments 28, 57 (1957)

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    N. F. Ramsey, Experiments with separated oscillatory fields and hydrogen masers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 541 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Y. V. Baklanov, B. Y. Dubetsky, and V. P. Chebotayev, Non-linear Ramsey resonance in the optical region, Ap- plied physics 9, 171 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    J. C. Bergquist, S. A. Lee, and J. L. Hall, Saturated Absorption with Spatially Separated Laser Fields: Ob- servation of Optical ”Ramsey” Fringes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 159 (1977). 6

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    C. J. Bord´ e, C. Salomon, S. Avrillier, A. van Lerberghe, C. Br´ eant, D. Bassi, and G. Scoles, Optical Ramsey fringes with traveling waves, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1836 (1984)

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    Schioppo, R

    M. Schioppo, R. C. Brown, W. F. McGrew, N. Hinkley, R. J. Fasano, K. Beloy, T. H. Yoon, G. Milani, D. Ni- colodi, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, Ultrastable optical clock with two cold- atom ensembles, Nature Photonics 11, 48 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Bothwell, D

    T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, E. Oelker, J. M. Robinson, S. L. Bromley, W. L. Tew, J. Ye, and C. J. Kennedy, Jila sri optical lattice clock with uncertainty of 2.0 x 10 −18, Metrologia 56, 065004 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    M. G. Kozlov, M. S. Safronova, J. R. Crespo L´ opez- Urrutia, and P. O. Schmidt, Highly charged ions: Opti- cal clocks and applications in fundamental physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045005 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Bothwell, C

    T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, E. Robinson, John M.and Oelker, A. Staron, and J. Ye, Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre- scale atomic sample, Nature 602, 420 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Werren, E

    N. Werren, E. M. Gauger, and P. Kirton, A quantum model of lasing without inversion, New J. Phys. 24, 093027 (2022), arXiv:2201.13368

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Richter, M

    M. Richter, M. Lytova, F. Morales, S. Haessler, O. Smirnova, M. Spanner, and M. Ivanov, Rotational quantum beat lasing without inversion, Optica 7, 586 (2020), arXiv:2001.08081

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Chu, X.-C

    K.-I. Chu, X.-C. Lu, K.-H. Chiang, Y.-H. Lin, C.-D. Chen, I. A. Yu, W.-T. Liao, and Y.-F. Chen, Slow and stored light via electromagnetically induced transparency using a Λ-type superconducting artificial atom, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012015 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    M. Hain, N. Stewen, and T. Halfmann, Light storage by electromagnetically induced transparency for one sec- ond at the level of a single photon in Pr3+:Y2SiO5 pre- pared with multiple frequency ensembles, New J. Phys. 27, 023029 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    A. V. Andreev, V. I. Emel’yanov, and Y. A. Il’inski˘ ı, Collective spontaneous emission (Dicke superradiance), Soviet Physics Uspekhi 23, 493 (1980)

    1980

  9. [17]

    V. V. Kocharovsky, V. Zheleznyakov, E. R. Kocharovskaya, and V. V. Kocharovsky, Superradi- ance: the principles of generation and implementation in lasers, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk 187, 367 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    S. L. McCall and E. L. Hahn, Self-induced transparency by pulsed coherent light, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 908 (1967)

    1967

  11. [19]

    G. L. Lamb, Elements of soliton theory , Pure And Ap- plied Mathematics (A Wiley-Interscience Series of Texts, Monographs & Tracts) (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1980)

    1980

  12. [20]

    Maimistov, A

    A. Maimistov, A. Basharov, S. Elyutin, and Y. Sklyarov, Present state of self-induced transparency theory, Physics Reports 191, 1 (1990)

    1990

  13. [21]

    A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Opti- cal quantum memory, Nature Photonics 3, 706 (2009), arXiv:arXiv:1002.4659v3

    2009 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Tittel, M

    W. Tittel, M. Afzelius, T. Chaneli´ ere, R. Cone, S. Kr¨ oll, S. Moiseev, and M. Sellars, Photon-echo quantum mem- ory in solid state systems, Laser and Photonics Reviews 4, 244 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Heshami, D

    K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V. M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances, Journal of Modern Optics 63, 2005 (2016), arXiv:1511.04018

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Chaneli` ere, G

    T. Chaneli` ere, G. H´ etet, and N. Sangouard, Chapter two - quantum optical memory protocols in atomic ensembles, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. 67, edited by E. Arimondo, L. F. DiMauro, and S. F. Yelin (Academic Press, 2018) pp. 77–150

    2018

  17. [25]

    M. Guo, S. Liu, W. Sun, M. Ren, F. Wang, and M. Zhong, Rare-earth quantum memories: The experi- mental status quo, Frontiers of Physics 18, 21303 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Z. Zhou, C. Liu, C. Li, G. Guo, D. Oblak, M. Lei, A. Faraon, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Pho- tonic Integrated Quantum Memory in Rare-Earth Doped Solids, Laser Photon. Rev. 17, 1 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    G. V. Voloshin, K. A. Barantsev, E. N. Popov, and A. N. Litvinov, The Effect of the Hyperfine Structure of an Excited Level on the Shape of the Coherent Population Trapping Resonance under Ramsey Interrogation in an Optically Dense Medium, Journal of Experimental and Theoretic...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Voloshin, K

    G. Voloshin, K. Barantsev, and A. Litvinov, Line shape and light shift of coherent population trapping resonance under Ramsey interrogation in ’hot’ atoms in an optically dense medium, Quantum Electronics 52, 108 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Arecchi and R

    F. Arecchi and R. Bonifacio, Theory of optical maser amplifiers, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 1, 169 (1965)

    1965

  22. [30]

    S. L. McCall and E. L. Hahn, Self-induced transparency, Physical Review 183, 457 (1969)

    1969

  23. [31]

    Allen and J

    L. Allen and J. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two-level Atoms, Dover books on physics and chemistry (Dover,

  24. [32]

    Weichselbaumer, M

    S. Weichselbaumer, M. Zens, C. W. Zollitsch, M. S. Brandt, S. Rotter, R. Gross, and H. Huebl, Echo trains in pulsed electron spin resonance of a strongly coupled spin ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 137701 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Debnath, G

    K. Debnath, G. Dold, J. J. L. Morton, and K. Mølmer, Self-stimulated pulse echo trains from inhomogeneously broadened spin ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 137702 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    S. A. Moiseev, M. Sabooni, and R. V. Urmancheev, Pho- ton echoes in optically dense media, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 012026 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, and A. C. Newell, Coherent pulse propagation, a dispersive, irreversible phenomenon, Journal of Mathematical Physics 15, 1852 (1974)

    1974

  28. [36]

    B. R. Frieden, Physics from Fisher information: a unifi- cation (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    1998

  29. [37]

    Beer, Bestimmung der absorption des rothen lichts in far- bigen fl¨ ussigkeiten, Annalen der Physik162, 78 (1852)

  30. [38]

    B¨ ottger, Y

    T. B¨ ottger, Y. Sun, C. W. Thiel, and R. L. Cone, Spec- troscopy and dynamics of Er3+:Y2SiO5 at 1.5 um, Phys. Rev. B 74, 075107 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Ranˇ ci´ c, M

    M. Ranˇ ci´ c, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, and M. J. Sellars, Coherence time of over a second in a telecom- compatible quantum memory storage material, Nat. Phys. 14, 50 (2018), arXiv:1611.04315

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. M. Minnegaliev, K. I. Gerasimov, and S. A. Moiseev, Implementation of a Quantum Memory Protocol Based on the Revival of Silenced Echo in Orthogonal Geome- try at the Telecommunication Wavelength, JETP Letters 7 117, 865 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins, J. F. Doyle, L. von der Wense, K. Beeks, A. Leitner, G. A. Kazakov, P. Li, P. G. Thirolf, T. Schumm, and J. Ye, Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock, Nature 633, 63 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    G. A. Kazakov, A. N. Litvinov, V. I. Romanenko, L. P. Yatsenko, A. V. Romanenko, M. Schreitl, G. Winkler, and T. Schumm, Performance of a229Thorium solid-state nuclear clock, New Journal of Physics 14, 083019 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    S. A. Moiseev and R. V. Urmancheev, Photon/spin echo in a Fabry–Perot cavity, Opt. Lett. 47, 3812 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    S. A. Moiseev and R. V. Urmancheev, Photon echo in a ring cavity: pulse area approach, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 42, 1001 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. R. Hush, and M. J. Sellars, Ultra- narrow Optical Inhomogeneous Linewidth in a Stoichio- metric Rare-Earth Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 250504 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    V. I. Yudin, A. V. Taichenachev, C. W. Oates, Z. W. Bar- ber, N. D. Lemke, A. D. Ludlow, U. Sterr, C. Lisdat, and F. Riehle, Hyper-Ramsey spectroscopy of optical clock transitions, Phys. Rev. A 82, 011804 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    Huntemann, B

    N. Huntemann, B. Lipphardt, M. Okhapkin, C. Tamm, E. Peik, A. V. Taichenachev, and V. I. Yudin, General- ized Ramsey Excitation Scheme with Suppressed Light Shift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 213002 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Zanon-Willette, R

    T. Zanon-Willette, R. Lefevre, R. Metzdorff, N. Silli- toe, S. Almonacil, M. Minissale, E. de Clercq, A. V. Taichenachev, V. I. Yudin, and E. Arimondo, Compos- ite laser-pulses spectroscopy for high-accuracy optical clocks: a review of recent progress and perspectives, Re- por...

    2018

  41. [49]

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. S. Safronova, A. P´ alffy, J. Weit- enberg, and P. G. Thirolf, Nuclear clocks for testing fun- damental physics, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 034002 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.