Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control

Ho-Chun Herbert Chang

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Under linear regression, social value equals degree centrality.

desk verdict A modest but useful theory paper: under a linear model the SV metric is just β_s times degree, and under an interaction model it is an asocial-covariate-weighted degree — with the caveat that this only goes through cleanly for unweighted networks where S equals degree. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13334 v1 pith:MN62LA3Y submitted 2025-05-19 cs.SI cs.LG

Ho-Chun Herbert Chang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.SIcs.LG

keywords socialvaluesyntheticcontrolinfluencedegreecentralityfriendshipparadoxensemblemodelslinearregressionnetworkscience

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what the recently proposed social value (SV) measure, which estimates influence by simulating each person's behavior without their neighbors and distributing the difference across a network, actually captures. For linear regression, it shows that SV reduces to the regression coefficient of the social variable times the node's degree, meaning it is exactly a scaled version of degree centrality. With interaction terms, SV depends on neighbors' asocial attributes and edge weights. The paper derives closed-form expectations on grid, scale-free, and random graphs, shows that any ensemble model simplifies to its social-variable components, and finds that the generalized friendship paradox holds for SV under correlation between attributes and degree. These results matter because SV is already used to rank influence in political and marketing studies; under linear models, such rankings would contain no information beyond popularity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the social value formula $SV(i) = \sum_{j \in nei(i)} w_{ij} \Delta y(j) / deg(j)$, where $\Delta y(j) = F(X,S) - F(X,0)$ is the synthetic-control difference from removing all social input, and the degree in the denominator is the neighbor's degree. The paper's derivations turn on a cancellation identity: because the social variable is defined to be the degree, $S_j / deg(j) = 1$ identically, so any $S_j$ appearing linearly in $\Delta y(j)$ is absorbed. This cancellation is what collapses the linear model to degree centrality, what transfers the interaction model's dependence onto neighbor covariates, and what reduces an ensemble to its social-variable base models.

What would settle it

Fit a linear regression where the social covariate is a weighted sum of interactions rather than degree, compute $\Delta y(j)$ and then $SV(i)$ on a small network, and check whether $SV(i)$ is still proportional to degree. If proportionality fails, the paper's Eq. 5 is not general; if it holds even with a non-degree social variable, the cancellation argument needs revisiting. A second check: on any real dataset with a linear SV model, regress $SV(i)$ on degree; the paper predicts an exact linear fit with slope $\beta_s$ up to numerical error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the social value of a node, defined as the sum of its neighbors' simulated responses to losing social input, is determined by the model and the graph in a highly tractable way. Specifically, if the outcome is generated by a linear model $y = \vec{\beta}\cdot\vec{X} + \beta_s S + \beta_0$, then the synthetic-control difference for node $j$ is $\Delta y(j) = \beta_s S_j$, and because the social variable $S_j$ equals the degree $deg(j)$, the $S_j/deg(j)$ factor in the SV formula cancels, leaving $SV(i) = \beta_s S_i$ (Eq. 5): social value is a scalar multiple of degree. With interaction terms, $\Delta y(j) = S_j(\vec{\beta}_s \cdot \vec{x}_j)$, the degree still cancels, and $SV(i)$ becomes an edge-weight-weighted sum of the neighbor asocial covariates dotted with the interaction coefficients (Eq. 7). For ensembles, trees that do not involve $S$ cancel in the difference, so only trees using $S$ contribute. These identities yield closed-form expected SV on lattice, Barabasi-Albert, and Erdos-Renyi graphs, and a generalized-friendship-paradox result: when an asocial attribute correlates with degree and interacts with the social variable with the same sign, a node's friends have higher average SV.

Load-bearing premise

The derivations assume that the social variable for each person is exactly equal to that person's degree in the network, so the ratio $S_j/deg(j)$ cancels to 1; if the social variable is a weighted or differently defined quantity, the stated formulas stop holding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the linear-model result holds, any study using linear-regression-based social value to rank 'influence' is actually ranking popularity, so conclusions about disproportionate influence should be re-examined.
With interaction terms, SV no longer tracks degree; it reflects asocial attributes of a node's neighbors, so influence attribution shifts to whom you are connected to, not how many.
For ensemble models, only base models that split on the social variable need to be evaluated to compute SV, offering a potentially large computational saving on sparse large networks.
The closed-form expectations on lattice, scale-free, and random graphs give quick sanity checks for empirical SV computations and show that heavy-tailed networks amplify SV variation.
The generalized friendship paradox for SV means that in settings where popularity correlates positively with a behavior, a typical user will see their friends as more influential; if the correlation is negative, the effect reverses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct implication the paper leaves implicit: if SV under linear models is just scaled degree, then any empirical claim of 'influence beyond popularity' requires either a nonlinear model or a social variable that is not degree; otherwise the measure is redundant with centrality.
The cancellation trick suggests a design principle for influence metrics: to capture influence beyond connectivity, the social covariate fed to the predictive model should differ from the degree used in the distribution step, or the model must include interactions or nonlinearity.
The ensemble reduction could be exploited as a computational algorithm: given a trained tree ensemble, one can mark the subset of trees that involve the social feature and compute SV by evaluating only those trees, making the method scalable to networks with millions of nodes.
The sign-dependence of the friendship paradox result could be tested empirically in domains where popularity is negatively associated with an outcome (e.g., contrarian or 'anti-influencer' behavior); the paper's framework predicts that in such populations, friends would on average have lower SV.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a modest theory paper about a metric that is already in use, and it does something useful. The main result — under ordinary linear regression, SV(i) = β_s S_i, so the metric is a rescaling of degree — is correct under the paper's own assumptions and is worth saying out loud for practitioners who might otherwise think SV adds information beyond popularity. The interaction case is also right: SV becomes a neighbor-weighted sum of asocial covariates, so it can diverge from degree when neighbors have high X. That is the real content, and it's new as far as I can tell.

The paper also does a decent job of reviewing why this metric sits between centrality and Shapley-style attribution, and the simulations illustrate the formulas without overclaiming. Citations are standard for this literature; I don't see obvious missing prior art beyond Eom & Jo and Williams et al., which are cited. The ensemble-model "reduction" is trivial — of course trees that don't use S cancel — and it is presented as a contribution, which oversells it. The generalized friendship paradox section is simulation-based, not an analytical proof; the paper says "we show" but what it actually shows is numerics on BA and ER graphs. The absence of error bars and code is minor for a theory-first paper but worth asking about.

The soft spot I'd care about is the one the stress-test flagged. Eq. 5 cancels S_j/deg(j), which requires S_j = deg(j). If by "social variable" you mean a weighted interaction count — money exchanged, messages sent — and the adjacency matrix A has arbitrary weights, that cancellation fails. The paper hand-waves this by saying "by definition, S is equal to degree," which is only true if the network is effectively unweighted. The motivating examples are weighted, so the paper needs to either restrict the theory to simple unweighted graphs or redo the derivations and Table 1 with weighted degree (node strength) as the social variable. That's a consistency problem, not a fatal one: the linear result holds perfectly well for the narrower case.

Bottom line: not a big-deal paper, but a useful one for anyone using Williams et al.'s SV measure and for methodologists who want to know whether SV is more than degree. If the author clarifies the weighted/unweighted scope and tones down the GFP and computation claims, I'd be happy to see it in print. Send it to a serious referee; it deserves one.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes 'social value' (SV), a network-based synthetic-control measure that distributes a model's predicted counterfactual change Δy(j) to neighbors. The main theoretical result is that under an ordinary linear model with a single social covariate S and the assumption that S equals degree, SV(i)=β_s S_i (Eq. 5), so that SV becomes a scaled degree centrality; with interaction terms, SV(i) is a weighted sum of the neighbors' asocial covariates (Eq. 7). The paper derives expected SV for lattice, Barabasi-Albert, and Erdos-Renyi graphs (Table 1), extends the cancellation argument to tree ensembles, and reports simulations on n=10,000 graphs showing SV distributions and a generalized friendship paradox for SV.

Significance. The paper is useful in a specific sense: it makes explicit that the SV measure, when paired with a linear model and the stated S=degree convention, reduces to degree centrality scaled by β_s, which is exactly the kind of scope-limiting result applied researchers need. The interaction-model formula, the expected values in Table 1, and the ensemble-model cancellation are transparent and, once the unweighted-graph assumption is stated, algebraically sound. The simulation design is simple and reproducible in principle, and the paper presents the generalized friendship paradox as a simulation finding with a clear sign condition. The contribution is modest but real, provided the scope conditions are stated correctly in revision.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.1 and Eq. (5)] The derivation of Eq. (5) uses the identities S_j/deg(j)=1 and Σ_{j∈nei(i)} w_{ij}=S_i. These are valid only when S_j equals the unweighted degree of node j and every edge has weight 1. Section 3.1, however, defines A as a weighted adjacency matrix and motivates S with examples such as money exchanged, likes, or messages, while also asserting 'By definition, S is equal to degree.' The two statements are incompatible: if S_j is an interaction strength, then S_j≠deg(j), and if w_{ij} are arbitrary weights, the row sum of A is not the unweighted degree. Consequently Eq. (5), the interaction result Eq. (7), and the expected values in Table 1 are established only for unweighted graphs. This is load-bearing because the paper's headline linear-model result is exactly SV(i)=β_s S_i. The revision should either restrict the theoretical claims to unweighted networks or derive the weighted analogues.
[Section 4.3 and Eq. (9)] Section 4.3 claims that the generalized friendship paradox holds for social value: if the correlation c between x_j and S_j and the relevant regression coefficient have the same sign, then friends have higher SV, and with opposite signs friends have lower SV. The text stops at Eq. (9), SV(i)=Σ_j w_{ij} b_x x_j, and then invokes Eom and Jo (2014). To make this an analytical claim, one must show that the expected difference E[SV(j)-SV(i)] has the asserted sign as a function of degree, taking into account the network structure and degree distribution; this is not done. Figure 2 provides a simulation illustration, but the paper presents the generalized friendship paradox as a contribution, so the analytical step should either be supplied or the claim should be explicitly downgraded to a simulation-based observation.
[Section 5.1] Section 5.1 reports simulation results as validation of Table 1, but it does not state the values used for β_S, β_X, β_{X,S}, or the noise term in the data-generating process. Figure 1a says the distributions follow expectations and Figure 1b claims a theoretical mean of 6, yet without the coefficient values the reader cannot verify the match or reproduce the figure. Please report the complete parameter grid for the simulations in Section 5.

minor comments (5)

[Section 4.1.1] The phrase 'S is on of the independent variable' should read 'S is one of the independent variables.'
[Section 4.1.1] The displayed variance formula 'Var (SV )2 = β2SVar (S)' should be written as Var(SV)=β_S^2 Var(S).
[Section 4.1.2] The symbol β_s is used both as a scalar coefficient of S in Eq. (6) and as a vector of all S-related coefficients immediately after; please define the convention explicitly before Eq. (7).
[Section 4.2] The statement that scale-free degree variance is undefined should be qualified for the range of the power-law exponent; for γ>3 the variance is finite.
[Section 5.1] The Figure 1 caption's phrase 'scaled by β2_S' is ambiguous; the distribution of β_S S is the degree distribution scaled by β_S, with variance multiplied by β_S^2.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Core linear-model result SV=β_s S_i is a definitional consequence of setting S=degree; no fitted-input or self-citation circularity otherwise.

self definitional [Section 3.1 (Eq. 2) and Section 4.1.1 (Eqs. 4-5)]
"By definition,S is equal to degree and⊙ refers to element-wise multiplication. ... As a result, for every individual,S is also equal to their degree. ... SV (i) = X j∈nei(i) wi,j ∆y(j) deg(j) (2) ... =βSSi (5)"

Eq. 4 gives Δy(j)=β_S S_j. Inserting this into the SV definition (Eq. 2) and using the paper's definitional identity S_j=deg(j), the factor S_j/deg(j) cancels to 1; the remaining sum of edge weights is then replaced by S_i using the same identity. Thus the headline result SV(i)=β_S S_i is the SV definition composed with the definition S=degree, so it is forced by construction rather than by any independent structural or empirical constraint. This is a definitional reduction, not a fitted-input prediction, and it is the only such step in the paper.

full rationale

The paper's analytical results are derived algebraically from the definition of social value and the assumed linear/interaction models; they are not obtained by fitting parameters to data and then predicting the same fitted quantities. The β_S coefficient is treated as a given model parameter, and the simulations use hand-chosen coefficients as demonstrations rather than as empirical validations. There is no load-bearing self-citation: citations to Chang et al. (2023) and Noh and Chang (2024) are illustrative and unrelated to the main derivations, and the social-value framework is attributed to Williams et al. (2023). The one notable reduction-by-construction is the linear-model result SV=β_S S_i, which follows immediately from defining S=degree and normalizing by degree in the SV formula; this is a mild self-definitional step, acknowledged explicitly in the paper ('By definition, S is equal to degree'). The separate concern that the weighted-adjacency matrix formulation is inconsistent with S=degree for non-unit weights is a correctness/robustness caveat, not a circularity. Overall, the paper is largely self-contained and its central derivations are valid consequences of its definitions, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivations depend critically on the assumption that the social variable equals node degree and that edges are unweighted. The GFP result additionally imports a theorem about node attributes and applies it to a composite metric without proof. No new entities are introduced; the simulations use hand-chosen parameters rather than empirical data.

free parameters (4)

Simulation network size n = 10000
Hand-chosen for computational feasibility, not derived from theory or data.
Average degree target = 4 (BA m=2; ER p=4/10000)
Chosen in Section 5 to match lattice default; arbitrary.
Asocial covariate distribution = X ~ N(2,4)
Chosen in Section 5: mean 2 as 'first nonnegative integer that does not have multiplicative properties'; variance 4 as expected degree.
Coefficient and correlation grid in Figure 2 = ranges not fully specified
Scanned to demonstrate sensitivity; not derived and not tied to data.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper The social variable S_j equals the degree of node j.
Stated in Section 3.1 ('By definition, S is equal to degree'). Used in Eq. 5 and 7 to cancel S_j/deg(j).
domain assumption Edge weights w_ij are binary (0 or 1).
The derivations replace the sum of w_ij over neighbors with degree, which requires unweighted edges. Not stated as a general condition.
domain assumption The generalized friendship paradox theorem (Eom and Jo, 2014) applies to social value.
Invoked in Section 4.3 to conclude friends have higher SV; the theorem is proven for node attributes correlated with degree, not for a function of neighbor degrees.
domain assumption The regression model is correctly specified and β_s is estimated without systematic error.
All theoretical SV formulas are expressed in terms of model coefficients; if the model is misspecified, the properties are not guaranteed. This is standard but unstated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MN62LA3Y

@misc{pith2026250513334,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MN62LA3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13334}
}

read the original abstract

Measuring social influence is difficult due to the lack of counter-factuals and comparisons. By combining machine learning-based modeling and network science, we present general properties of social value, a recent measure for social influence using synthetic control applicable to political behavior. Social value diverges from centrality measures on in that it relies on an external regressor to predict an output variable of interest, generates a synthetic measure of influence, then distributes individual contribution based on a social network. Through theoretical derivations, we show the properties of SV under linear regression with and without interaction, across lattice networks, power-law networks, and random graphs. A reduction in computation can be achieved for any ensemble model. Through simulation, we find that the generalized friendship paradox holds -- that in certain situations, your friends have on average more influence than you do.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13334 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Heat map for social value by varying the coefficient strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...
[3]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...
[4]

, author Diamond, A

author Abadie, A. , author Diamond, A. , author Hainmueller, J. , year 2010 . title Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of california’s tobacco control program . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 105 , pages 493--505

work page 2010
[5]

, author Diamond, A

author Abadie, A. , author Diamond, A. , author Hainmueller, J. , year 2015 . title Comparative politics and the synthetic control method . journal American Journal of Political Science volume 59 , pages 495--510

work page 2015
[6]

, author Gardeazabal, J

author Abadie, A. , author Gardeazabal, J. , year 2003 . title The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the basque country . journal American economic review volume 93 , pages 113--132

work page 2003
[7]

, author Imbens, G.W

author Abadie, A. , author Imbens, G.W. , year 2006 . title Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects . journal Econometrica volume 74 , pages 235--267

work page 2006
[8]

, author Arriaga, R.I

author Aher, G.V. , author Arriaga, R.I. , author Kalai, A.T. , year 2023 . title Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies , in: booktitle International Conference on Machine Learning , organization PMLR . pp. pages 337--371

work page 2023

Show all 55 references

[9]

, author Gentzkow, M

author Allcott, H. , author Gentzkow, M. , author Mason, W. , author Wilkins, A. , author Barber \'a , P. , author Brown, T. , author Cisneros, J.C. , author Crespo-Tenorio, A. , author Dimmery, D. , author Freelon, D. , et al., year 2024 . title The effects of facebook and in...

2024
[10]

, author Pischke, J.S

author Angrist, J.D. , author Pischke, J.S. , year 2009 . title Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion . publisher Princeton University Press

2009
[11]

, year 1980

author Basu, D. , year 1980 . title Randomization analysis of experimental data: The fisher randomization test . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 75 , pages 575--582

1980
[12]

, author Horiuchi, Y

author Beckley, M. , author Horiuchi, Y. , author Miller, J.M. , year 2018 . title America's role in the making of japan's economic miracle . journal Journal of East Asian Studies volume 18 , pages 1--21

2018
[13]

, author Largeron, C

author Benyahia, O. , author Largeron, C. , year 2015 . title Centrality for graphs with numerical attributes , in: booktitle Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015 , pp. pages 1348--1353

2015
[14]

, author Scornet, E

author Biau, G. , author Scornet, E. , year 2016 . title A random forest guided tour . journal Test volume 25 , pages 197--227

2016
[15]

, year 2007

author Bonacich, P. , year 2007 . title Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality . journal Social networks volume 29 , pages 555--564

2007
[16]

, year 2005

author Borgatti, S.P. , year 2005 . title Centrality and network flow . journal Social Networks volume 27 , pages 55--71

2005
[17]

, year 2001

author Brandes, U. , year 2001 . title A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality . journal Journal of mathematical sociology volume 25 , pages 163--177

2001
[18]

, year 1990

author Card, D. , year 1990 . title The impact of the mariel boatlift on the miami labor market . journal Ilr Review volume 43 , pages 245--257

1990
[19]

, author Krueger, A.B

author Card, D. , author Krueger, A.B. , year 1994 . title Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in new jersey and pennsylvania . journal American Economic Review volume 84 , pages 772--793

1994
[20]

, author Titiunik, R

author Cattaneo, M.D. , author Titiunik, R. , year 2022 . title Regression discontinuity designs . journal Annual Review of Economics volume 14 , pages 821--851

2022
[21]

, year 2010

author Centola, D. , year 2010 . title The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment . journal Science volume 329 , pages 1194--1197

2010
[22]

, author Harrington, B

author Chang, H.C.H. , author Harrington, B. , author Fu, F. , author Rockmore, D.N. , year 2023 . title Complex systems of secrecy: the offshore networks of oligarchs . journal PNAS nexus volume 2 , pages pgad051

2023
[23]

, author Guestrin, C

author Chen, T. , author Guestrin, C. , year 2016 . title Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system , in: booktitle Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pp. pages 785--794

2016
[24]

, year 2023

author Duxbury, S.W. , year 2023 . title The problem of scaling in exponential random graph models . journal Sociological Methods & Research volume 52 , pages 764--802

2023
[25]

, year 2024 a

author Duxbury, S.W. , year 2024 a. title Micro effects on macro structure in social networks . journal Sociological Methodology volume 54 , pages 1--26

2024
[26]

, year 2024 b

author Duxbury, S.W. , year 2024 b. title Micro-macro mediation analysis in social networks . journal Sociological Methodology volume 54 , pages 269--299

2024
[27]

, author Wertsching, J

author Duxbury, S.W. , author Wertsching, J. , year 2023 . title Scaling bias in pooled exponential random graph models . journal Social Networks volume 74 , pages 19--30

2023
[28]

, author Jo, H.H

author Eom, Y.H. , author Jo, H.H. , year 2014 . title Generalized friendship paradox in complex networks: The case of scientific collaboration . journal Scientific reports volume 4 , pages 1--6

2014
[29]

, year 1979

author Freeman, L.C. , year 1979 . title Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification . journal Social Networks volume 1 , pages 215--239

1979
[30]

, author Lazer, D

author Gonz \'a lez-Bail \'o n, S. , author Lazer, D. , author Barber \'a , P. , author Godel, W. , author Allcott, H. , author Brown, T. , author Crespo-Tenorio, A. , author Freelon, D. , author Gentzkow, M. , author Guess, A.M. , et al., year 2024 . title The diffusion and r...

2024
[31]

, author Lazer, D

author Gonz \'a lez-Bail \'o n, S. , author Lazer, D. , author Barber \'a , P. , author Zhang, M. , author Allcott, H. , author Brown, T. , author Crespo-Tenorio, A. , author Freelon, D. , author Gentzkow, M. , author Guess, A.M. , et al., year 2023 . title Asymmetric ideologi...

2023
[32]

, author Malhotra, N

author Guess, A.M. , author Malhotra, N. , author Pan, J. , author Barber \'a , P. , author Allcott, H. , author Brown, T. , author Crespo-Tenorio, A. , author Dimmery, D. , author Freelon, D. , author Gentzkow, M. , et al., year 2023 . title Reshares on social media amplify p...

2023
[33]

, author Robins, J.M

author Hernán, M.A. , author Robins, J.M. , year 2020 . title Causal Inference: What If . publisher Chapman & Hall/CRC

2020
[34]

, author Imai, K

author Ho, D.E. , author Imai, K. , author King, G. , author Stuart, E.A. , year 2007 . title Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference . journal Political Analysis volume 15 , pages 199--236

2007
[35]

, author Handcock, M.S

author Hunter, D.R. , author Handcock, M.S. , author Butts, C.T. , author Goodreau, S.M. , author Morris, M. , year 2008 . title ergm: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks . journal Journal of Statistical Software volume 24 , pages 1--29

2008
[36]

, author Lemieux, T

author Imbens, G.W. , author Lemieux, T. , year 2008 . title Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice . journal Journal of Econometrics volume 142 , pages 615--635

2008
[37]

, author Rubin, D.B

author Imbens, G.W. , author Rubin, D.B. , year 2015 . title Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction . publisher Cambridge University Press

2015
[38]

, year 2011

author Jackson, M.O. , year 2011 . title Social networks in economics . journal Handbook of Social Economics volume 1 , pages 511--585

2011
[39]

, author Bengio, Y

author LeCun, Y. , author Bengio, Y. , author Hinton, G. , year 2015 . title Deep learning . journal nature volume 521 , pages 436--444

2015
[40]

, year 2008

author Lee, D.S. , year 2008 . title Randomized experiments from non-random selection in us house elections . journal Journal of Econometrics volume 142 , pages 675--697

2008
[41]

, author Castelo, N

author Li, P. , author Castelo, N. , author Katona, Z. , author Sarvary, M. , year 2024 . title Frontiers: Determining the validity of large language models for automated perceptual analysis . journal Marketing Science volume 43 , pages 254--266

2024
[42]

, author Lee, S.I

author Lundberg, S.M. , author Lee, S.I. , year 2017 . title A unified approach to interpreting model predictions . journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems volume 30

2017
[43]

, author Winship, C

author Morgan, S.L. , author Winship, C. , year 2014 . title Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research . edition 2nd ed., publisher Cambridge University Press

2014
[44]

, author Knoll, A

author Natekin, A. , author Knoll, A. , year 2013 . title Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial . journal Frontiers in neurorobotics volume 7 , pages 21

2013
[45]

, author Chang, H.C.H

author Noh, S. , author Chang, H.C.H. , year 2024 . title Llms with personalities in multi-issue negotiation games . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05248

2024 arXiv
[46]

, author Settle, J

author Nyhan, B. , author Settle, J. , author Thorson, E. , author Wojcieszak, M. , author Barber \'a , P. , author Chen, A.Y. , author Allcott, H. , author Brown, T. , author Crespo-Tenorio, A. , author Dimmery, D. , et al., year 2023 . title Like-minded sources on facebook a...

2023
[47]

, author Zou, C.Q

author Park, J.S. , author Zou, C.Q. , author Shaw, A. , author Hill, B.M. , author Cai, C. , author Morris, M.R. , author Willer, R. , author Liang, P. , author Bernstein, M.S. , year 2024 . title Generative agent simulations of 1,000 people . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10109

2024 arXiv
[48]

, year 2000

author Pearl, J. , year 2000 . title Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference . publisher Cambridge University Press

2000
[49]

, year 2002

author Rosenbaum, P.R. , year 2002 . title Observational Studies . publisher Springer

2002
[50]

, author Snijders, T.A.B

author Steglich, C. , author Snijders, T.A.B. , author Pearson, M. , year 2010 . title Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence . journal Sociological Methodology volume 40 , pages 329--393

2010
[51]

, author Chen, V

author Tjuatja, L. , author Chen, V. , author Wu, T. , author Talwalkwar, A. , author Neubig, G. , year 2024 . title Do llms exhibit human-like response biases? a case study in survey design . journal Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics volume 12 , pa...

2024
[52]

, author Athey, S

author Wager, S. , author Athey, S. , year 2018 . title Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 113 , pages 1228--1242

2018
[53]

, author Khan, E.M

author Williams, D. , author Khan, E.M. , author Pathak, N. , author Srivastava, J. , year 2023 . title Social value: A computational model for measuring influence on purchases and actions for individuals and systems . journal Journal of Advertising volume 52 , pages 247--263

2023
[54]

, year 2002

author Winter, E. , year 2002 . title The shapley value . journal Handbook of game theory with economic applications volume 3 , pages 2025--2054

2002
[55]

, author Williams, D

author Yang, A. , author Williams, D. , year 2024 . title Quantifying networked influence: How much do disinformation spreaders’ networks drive their public engagement outcomes? journal Social Media+ Society volume 10 , pages 20563051241265865

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

[3] [3]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

[4] [4]

, author Diamond, A

author Abadie, A. , author Diamond, A. , author Hainmueller, J. , year 2010 . title Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of california’s tobacco control program . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 105 , pages 493--505

work page 2010

[5] [5]

, author Diamond, A

author Abadie, A. , author Diamond, A. , author Hainmueller, J. , year 2015 . title Comparative politics and the synthetic control method . journal American Journal of Political Science volume 59 , pages 495--510

work page 2015

[6] [6]

, author Gardeazabal, J

author Abadie, A. , author Gardeazabal, J. , year 2003 . title The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the basque country . journal American economic review volume 93 , pages 113--132

work page 2003

[7] [7]

, author Imbens, G.W

author Abadie, A. , author Imbens, G.W. , year 2006 . title Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects . journal Econometrica volume 74 , pages 235--267

work page 2006

[8] [8]

, author Arriaga, R.I

author Aher, G.V. , author Arriaga, R.I. , author Kalai, A.T. , year 2023 . title Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies , in: booktitle International Conference on Machine Learning , organization PMLR . pp. pages 337--371

work page 2023