Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Complementarity of Gravitational Collapse (I) Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims black hole entropy arises from counting quantum states of collapsing dust shells, with Schwarzschild and Lemaitre coordinates giving complementary views of the same horizonless interior.

desk verdict A concrete dust-collapse construction whose entropy coefficient is fixed by hand at the last step; worth a referee's time as a conjecture, not as a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14750 v2 pith:TAPF5FAI submitted 2025-05-20 gr-qc

Ding-fang Zeng This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords bekenstein-hawkingcollapsecomplementaritydefinitionentropygravitationalinnerstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Black holes are usually pictured as regions where all matter is crushed into a singularity. This paper argues that, seen in the time coordinate of a distant observer, a collapsing star never quite forms a true horizon: it becomes a dense contracting object with an extended mass distribution. In the time coordinate of the falling matter, the same star crosses the center and oscillates. The author calls these two views complementary and claims they describe the same black hole interior from two valid coordinate perspectives.

To explain black hole entropy, the collapsing star is modeled as a set of concentric dust shells. Each shell is quantized with a hydrogen-like wave equation, and the full state is a product of shell wave functions. The paper then counts how many ways the total mass can be partitioned among shells and how many radial excitations are allowed. The logarithm of this count is claimed to equal the Bekenstein-Hawking area law, with logarithmic corrections.

The key weakness appears in the counting formula. The paper writes the degeneracy with a factor c depending on a partition precision parameter epsilon, then states that setting epsilon to a specific value gives the exact Bekenstein-Hawking formula. Choosing a parameter after knowing the target answer is calibration, not derivation. The claimed one-to-one correspondence between the two solution families is also asserted rather than proved, and the observational predictions are deferred to companion papers.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's load-bearing assertion is: 'The area-law formula of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy arises from the degeneracy of the quantised wave functional of the collapsing matter's configuration.' Equivalently, the two state ensembles labeled EiS and EiL are declared complementary, so a Schwarzschild-time collapsar ensemble and a Lemaitre-time oscillating solid ball describe the same black hole microstates. If true, black hole entropy follows from ordinary matter state counting in classical general relativity, and physical black holes have extended inner structure rather than a realized event horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The central derivation depends on the unproved assertion that the two exact solution families are in one-to-one correspondence, stated as: 'It can be checked that all initial mass profile and collapsing rate allowable by (4) have correspondences in (1), and vice versa.' This mapping is what lets the quantized Schwarzschild-side entropy be transferred to the full complementarity picture. The entropy count also assumes shells can be treated as independent, factorized wave functions, and that the unpredictability of physics across the singularity implies ergodic oscillation. If the parameter correspondence or the shell factorization fails, the complementarity and the entropy count collapse.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'complementarity' picture of black hole interiors: the same gravitational collapse is described either as an ensemble of horizonless collapsars in Schwarzschild time (EiS) or as an oscillating, ergodic solid ball in Lemaitre time (EiL). It claims these are equally complete descriptions related by general covariance, and that quantizing the shell-decomposed Schwarzschild-side wave functional yields the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula A/(4Gℏ) by counting degeneracies. The argument proceeds through exact dust solution families, a shell canonical quantization, and a degeneracy counting step that introduces a partition precision parameter ε.

Significance. If the derivation were sound, the paper would give a purely classical-GR origin of black hole entropy without string theory or loop quantum gravity, and it would make distinctive observational predictions (horizonless black holes, gravitational-wave signatures, and a new fast radio burst mechanism). That would be a significant result. However, the central entropy count is not self-contained: the area-law coefficient is fixed by choosing the free parameter ε after the fact. The paper also rests on an unproved one-to-one correspondence between two solution families and on ad hoc assumptions of shell factorization and ergodicity. I credit the author for constructing explicit dust solutions and for clearly stating several interpretive assumptions, but the claims as presented are not supported by the derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [The Origin of Bek-Hwk Entropy, Eq. (19)] The central degeneracy is written as W = exp{c(ε)[A/4Gℏ + ln X(A)]}, with ε an unquantified 'precision' of shell partition and c(ε) an unspecified function of ε. The paper then says, 'by setting ε = ln 2/(8π) we will get the exact Bek-Hwk entropy formula with logarithmic corrections.' This is a calibration, not a derivation: the coefficient 1/4 is imposed by the choice of ε (through c(ε)), and no independent rule is given that would determine ε from first principles. Since any prefactor could be reproduced by choosing ε differently, the claimed origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is not established.
  2. [Exact solution families] The asserted one-to-one correspondence between the solution families (1) and (4) is load-bearing for the complementarity argument, but it is supported only by the sentence 'It can be checked that all initial mass profile and collapsing rate allowable by (4) have correspondences in (1), and vice versa.' No mapping between the parameters (mS[0,r], ṁS[0,2GMtot]) and (mL[ρ], a0) is constructed, and no proof of bijectivity is given. Without this correspondence, the transfer of the entropy count from the Schwarzschild-side quantization to the full complementarity picture is unsupported.
  3. [The Origin of Bek-Hwk Entropy, Eqs. (11)–(14)] The wave functional of the whole collapsar is defined as a direct product of single-shell wave functions, Ψ[M(r)] = ψ0 ⊗ ψ1 ⊗ ψ2 ⊗ ... This assumes that the shells can be treated as independent, non-interacting degrees of freedom and that every microstate of the gravitational system is represented by such a factorized configuration plus a radial excitation scheme. No argument is provided that the shell partition {mi} and radial excitations {ni} are in one-to-one correspondence with distinct physical configurations of the metric (1), nor that condition (14) exhausts the admissible state space. The degeneracy count therefore enumerates a toy model's configurations, not necessarily the black hole's microstates.
  4. [Exact solution families, Lemaitre-time discussion] The ergodicity postulate is introduced as: 'The unpredictability of physics across the singularity only means that such an oscillation is ergodic.' This assertion is essential because it turns the Lemaitre-side into an ensemble that samples all modes mL[ρ] ⊗ a0, which in turn is what makes EiS and EiL comparable ensembles. No derivation or plausibility argument from the Einstein equation, the geodesic equation, or quantum theory is given; it is an ad hoc axiom. If this assumption is not justified, the claimed equivalence of the two descriptions is not established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (12)] The associated Laguerre polynomial is misspelled as 'Lagurre'; it should be 'Laguerre'.
  2. [After Eq. (18)] The word 'defintion' should be 'definition'.
  3. [Title] The running title in the manuscript, 'Inside Black Holes, Singularity or Complementarity?', is inconsistent with the arXiv title 'Complementarity of Gravitational Collapse (I) Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy'.
  4. [Eq. (17)] The step from the conditions GM_i m_i/ℏ = 2 for all i to k = GM_tot^2/(2√2 ℏ) is not shown and is not obvious from the preceding equations; the summation over i of 2ℏ/(GM_i) = m_i does not transparently yield this value of k.
  5. [Potential observational signals] The term 'plasmonic crust' is used without definition in this manuscript; presumably it is introduced in the companion paper [30], making the present discussion difficult to evaluate.
  6. [Conclusion and discussion] There are typos 'apriori' (should be 'a priori') and 'analsys' (should be 'analysis').

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The Bekenstein-Hawking area-law coefficient is set by choosing the free precision parameter ε = ln2/(8π) after Eq. (19), so the entropy "derivation" is a calibration rather than a derivation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [The Origin of Bek-Hwk Entropy, around Eq. (19)]
    "So the degeneracy of the wave-functional (11) becomes W = exp{c(ϵ)[A/4Gℏ+ lnX(A)]}, A=4π(2GMtot)^2, where ϵ parameterises the precision of the shell partition and c(ϵ) is an ϵ-dependent constant. This parameter affects the value of k linearly so by setting ϵ = ln 2 / 8π we will get the exact Bek-Hwk entropy formula with logarithmic corrections."

    The area term A/4Gℏ is inserted into the degeneracy formula (19) before any calculation, with an undetermined coefficient c(ϵ). The paper's own Eq. (17) would give a degeneracy 2^k = exp((ln2/(2√2)) GM^2/ℏ), whose coefficient differs from A/(4Gℏ)=4π GM^2/ℏ by a large factor. The paper then declares that choosing the free precision parameter ϵ = ln2/(8π) yields the exact Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. No independent determination of ϵ is given. The target coefficient 1/4 is therefore an input chosen to match the known result, not a prediction from the state counting. Any desired coefficient could be reproduced by a different ε, so the central claimed derivation reduces to a fit.

full rationale

The paper's complementarity picture, EiS=EiL, is presented as an interpretation of coordinate invariance and has independent content, but the proof that the wave-functional degeneracy yields the Bekenstein-Hawking area law is explicitly circular. The degeneracy W in Eq. (19) is written with the desired A/4Gℏ term already present, and the undetermined parameter ϵ is then set to ln2/(8π) to make the prefactor exactly 1/4. This is a textbook case of fitting a free parameter to the target result. The one-to-one correspondence between the two exact solution families is asserted without proof, and the quantization steps cite prior self-authored works, but these are correctness/rigor concerns rather than circularity; the decisive circular step is the epsilon tuning. Because the paper's headline claim—that the area law follows naturally from state counting—reduces to that parameter choice, the circularity score is high.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The ledger shows two calibrated parameters (epsilon and c(epsilon)) in the entropy count, four background assumptions, and one speculative physical entity. The calibrated epsilon is the most serious item because it directly sets the area law coefficient.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon (shell partition precision) = ln 2 / (8 pi)
    Introduced to define distinguishability of shell partition schemes; assigned the value needed to turn eq. (19) into S = A/4G hbar. This is a calibrated constant, not a derived quantity.
  • c(epsilon) = unspecified function of epsilon
    Appears as the prefactor in W = exp{c(epsilon)[A/4G hbar + ln X(A)]}; its dependence on epsilon is never derived, so it can absorb any normalization error.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The metric families (1) and (4) are exact solutions of the Einstein equations for spherical dust collapse, as referenced to refs. [17] and [21].
    The paper takes these solutions as given and does not re-derive them; the entropy and complementarity arguments rest on their validity.
  • domain assumption General covariance justifies identifying the Schwarzschild-time and Lemaitre-time descriptions as equally complete, and this identification extends to the full ensemble of microstates.
    Coordinate equivalence alone does not imply that arbitrary initial data sets correspond one-to-one; the paper asserts this correspondence without proof after eq. (6).
  • ad hoc to paper Unpredictability of physics across the central singularity implies that the post-crossing oscillation is ergodic over all modes mL[rho] x a0.
    This is a physical assumption specific to the paper: unpredictability could mean a breakdown of description rather than ergodic exploration of all modes.
  • domain assumption The collapsar can be decomposed into independent concentric shells whose wave functions factorize.
    The quantization in eqs. (8)-(11) treats shells as non-interacting except through the enclosed mass Mi; no argument is given that this captures the true degrees of freedom.
invented entities (1)
  • Close-to-implementing, horizonless collapsar with extended internal mass distribution and plasmonic crust
    purpose: Serves as the physical black hole interior: it replaces the event horizon and singularity, and is claimed to explain gravitational wave ringdown structure and fast radio bursts.
    The paper states the observational support is in companion works [29,30], which are not provided here. No quantitative prediction with an observable handle appears in this text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complementarity of Gravitational Collapse (I) Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TAPF5FAI

@misc{pith2026250514750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complementarity of Gravitational Collapse (I) Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TAPF5FAI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14750}
}
read the original abstract

Through two exact solution families to Einstein equation and one-to-one correspondence between their free parameters, we show that the ensemble of collapsars with arbitrarily close-to-implementing horizon in the Schwarzschild time definition and the over-cross-oscillatory solid-ball ergodically experiencing all possible modes in the Lema\^itre time definition constitute two complementary description for the inner structure of black holes formed through gravitational collapse. As a support for this complementarity, we prove that the area law formula of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy by counting the degeneracy of collapsing material's wave functional directly. In two companion works, observational signals of this inner structure picture will be reported independently.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14750 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: In the Schwarzschild time definition, the horizon of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal Space-Time Structure and non-Hausdorff Extension of Schwarzschild Black Hole Interior

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Geodesic reflections fix causal cones under the horizon; the RN zero-charge limit yields an infinite band without closed cycles, plus a non-Hausdorff thermal interior extension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities”, Phys. Rev. Lett.14 (3), 57(1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    Breakdown of Predictability in Gravita- tional Collapse

    S. Hawking, “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravita- tional Collapse”, Phys. Rev. D14, 2460 (1976)

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Global structure of space- times, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey

    R. Geroch and G. Horowitz, “Global structure of space- times, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey”, pp. 212–293, 1979

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Do Black Holes have Singularities?

    R. P. Kerr, “Do Black Holes have Singularities?” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.00841

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00841

  5. [5]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity”, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1 (1969) 252, Gen. Rel. Grav. 34 (2002) 1141, DOI:10.1023/A:1016578408204

    doi:10.1023/a:1016578408204 1969

  6. [6]

    Singularities and time-asymmetry

    R. Penrose, “Singularities and time-asymmetry”, Pen- rose, R. Israel, W. (Ed.). (1979). Singularities and time- asymmetry. United Kingdom: University Press

    work page 1979

  7. [7]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger, C. Vafa, “Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy”, Phys. Lett. B379 (1996)99, arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Counting States of Near- Extremal Black Holes

    G. Horowitz, A. Strominger, “Counting States of Near- Extremal Black Holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett.77 (1996) 2368- 2371, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2368

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2368 1996

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Statistical Interpretation of the Bekenstein Entropy for Systems with a Stretched 6 Horizon

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Statistical Interpretation of the Bekenstein Entropy for Systems with a Stretched 6 Horizon”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(2002) 211303, DOI:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.88.211303

    2002

  2. [10]

    Fuzzball Solutions for BHs and D1-Brane–D5-Brane Microstates

    K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Fuzzball Solutions for BHs and D1-Brane–D5-Brane Microstates”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 071601, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98. 071601

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    Black hole entropy from loop quantum grav- ity

    C. Rovelli, “Black hole entropy from loop quantum grav- ity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3288, arXiv:gr-qc/ 9603063

    1996

  4. [12]

    Quantum Geometry and Black Hole Entropy

    A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, K. Krasnov, “Quantum Geometry and Black Hole Entropy”, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 904, arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschildsingularity

    A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, “Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschildsingularity”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23 (2006) 391–411, arXiv:gr-qc/0509075

    2006 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Loop quantum black hole

    L. Modesto, “Loop quantum black hole”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23 (2006) 5587–5601, arXiv:gr-qc/ 0509078

    2006

  7. [15]

    Soft Hair on Black Holes

    S. Hawking, M. Perry, A. Strominger, “Soft Hair on Black Holes”, Phys.Rev.Lett. 116 (2016) 231301, DOI:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.231301, arXiv:hep-th/1601.00921

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    horizonless

    try dancing with the two simultaneously under mu- sics inaudible to all gravitational probes. The common feature of these attempts is, their inner structure picture of BHs are indistinguishable from that of singularity be- lief by the current and near future observations. In c...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. Magan, M. Sasieta, “Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes”, Phys.Rev.Lett 132 (2024) 141501, DOI:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.141501, arXiv:hep-th/2212.08623

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Microscopic State of BHs and an Ex- act One Body Method for Binary Dynamics in General Relativity

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Microscopic State of BHs and an Ex- act One Body Method for Binary Dynamics in General Relativity”, EPJC 84 (2024) 370, arXiv:2311.11764

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The BH Interpretation of String The- ory

    G. ’t Hooft, “The BH Interpretation of String The- ory”, Nucl. Phys. B335 (1990) 138, doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(90)90174-C

    1990

  12. [20]

    Quantum BH Evaporation

    K. Schoutens, E. Verlinde, H. Verlinde “Quantum BH Evaporation”, Phys.Rev. D48 (1993) 2670, doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.48.2670

    1993

  13. [21]

    The stretched horizon and BH complementarity

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius, and J. Uglum, “The stretched horizon and BH complementarity” Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 3743, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3743

    1993 doi

  14. [22]

    Resolving the Schwarzschild singular- ity in both classic and quantum gravities

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Resolving the Schwarzschild singular- ity in both classic and quantum gravities”, Nucl. Phys. B917 (2017) 178, arXiv: 1606.06178, doi.org/10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2017.02.005

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Exact inner metric and microscopic state of AdS 3-Schwarzschild BHs

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Exact inner metric and microscopic state of AdS 3-Schwarzschild BHs”, Nucl. Phys. B954 (2020) 115001, arXiv: 1812.06777, doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2020.115001

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Spontaneous Radiation of BHs

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Spontaneous Radiation of BHs”, Nucl. Phys. B977 (2022) 115722, arXiv: 2112.12531, doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115722

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gravity Induced Spontaneous Ra- diation

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Gravity Induced Spontaneous Ra- diation”, Nucl. Phys. B990 (2023) 116171,arXiv: 2207.05158, doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023. 116171

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Schwarzschild Fuzzball and Explic- itly Unitary Hawking Radiations

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Schwarzschild Fuzzball and Explic- itly Unitary Hawking Radiations”, Nucl. Phys. B930 (2018) 533-544, arXiv: 1802.00675, doi.org/10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2018.03.012

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Information missing puzzle, where is hawking’s error?

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Information missing puzzle, where is hawking’s error?”, Nucl. Phys. B941 (2018) 665, arXiv: 1804.06726, doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb. 2019.02.023

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum gravitational collapse: non-singularity and non-locality

    E. Greenwood, D. Stojkovic, “Quantum gravitational collapse: non-singularity and non-locality” JHEP 0806 (2008) 042, 0802.4087

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Non-local (but also non-singular) physics at the last stages of gravitational collapse

    A. Saini, D. Stojkovic, “Non-local (but also non-singular) physics at the last stages of gravitational collapse”, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 044003 1401.6182

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Inspiral to Merger, a Full Process Ap- plicable One Body Method to the Two Body problem in General Relativity

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Inspiral to Merger, a Full Process Ap- plicable One Body Method to the Two Body problem in General Relativity”, to appear as the second cousin of this manuscript

  23. [31]

    Complementarity inside BHs, Fast Ra- dial Burst as a Prediction

    Ding-fang Zeng, “Complementarity inside BHs, Fast Ra- dial Burst as a Prediction”, to appear as the third cousin of this manuscript

  24. [32]

    CPT-Symmetric Universe

    L. Boyle, K. Finn, and N. Turok, “CPT-Symmetric Universe”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 251301, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251301

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter

    L. Boyle, K. Finn, N. Turok, “The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter”, Annals of Physics 438 (2022) 168767, DOI:10.1016/j.aop.2022.168767

    2022

  26. [34]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs”, GWTC-1: Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 031040, arXiv: 1811.12907, doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Ob- serving Run

    “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Ob- serving Run”, GWTC-2: Phys. Rev.X11 (2021) 021053, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run”, GWTC-3: doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2111.03606

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Single-domain spectral method for black hole puncture data

    M. Ansorg, B. Brugmann, W. Tichy, “Single-domain spectral method for black hole puncture data”, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 064011, arXiv: gr-qc/0404056 doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.064011

    2004 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Filling the holes: Evolving excised binary black hole initial data with puncture techniques

    Z. B. Etienne, J. A. Faber, Y. T. Liu et al, “Filling the holes: Evolving excised binary black hole initial data with puncture techniques”, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 101503, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.101503

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    Comparison of binary black hole initial data sets

    V. Varma, M. A. Scheel,H. P. Pfeiffer, “Comparison of binary black hole initial data sets”, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 104011, arXiv: 1808.08228, doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.104011

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Interior of a Binary Black Hole Merger

    D. Pook-Kolb, O. Birnholtz, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnet- ter, “Interior of a Binary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 171102, arXiv:1903.05626. doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.123.171102

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C F. B. Macedo and et al, “Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale”, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) no.8, 084031, arXiv:1608.08637

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gravitational wave echoes from black hole area quantization

    V. Cardoso, V. F. Foit, M. Kleban, “Gravitational wave echoes from black hole area quantization”, JCAP 08 (2019) 006, arXiv: 1902.10164, doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2019/08/006

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Analytical model for gravitational-wave echoes from spinning rem- nants

    E. Maggio, A. Testa, S. Bhagwat, P. Pani, “Analytical model for gravitational-wave echoes from spinning rem- nants”, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 064056 (2019), arXiv: 1907.03091, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.064056

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    On Black Hole Echoes

    G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, “On Black Hole Echoes”, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 044001, arXiv: 1912.05584, doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044001

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Potential gravitational-wave signatures of quantum gravity

    I. Agullo, V. Cardoso, A. del Rio etal, “Potential gravitational-wave signatures of quantum gravity”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 041302, arXiv: 2007.13761, doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041302

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Gravitational wave echoes 7 from black holes in massive gravity

    R.f. Dong, D. Stojkovic, “Gravitational wave echoes 7 from black holes in massive gravity”, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 026058, arXiv: 2011.04032, doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.024058

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Im- plications of the quantum nature of the black hole hori- zon on the gravitational-wave ring-down

    S. Chakraborty, E. Maggio, A. Mazumdar, P. Pani, “Im- plications of the quantum nature of the black hole hori- zon on the gravitational-wave ring-down”, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 024041, arXiv: 2202.09111. doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.106.024041

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fuzzball Shadows: Emergent Horizons from Microstructure

    F. Bacchini, D. R. Mayerson, B. Ripperda et al, “Fuzzball Shadows: Emergent Horizons from Microstructure”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 171601

    2021

  41. [49]

    Modave Lectures on Horizon-Size Mi- crostructure, Fuzzballs and Observations

    D. R. Mayerson, “Modave Lectures on Horizon-Size Mi- crostructure, Fuzzballs and Observations”, arxiv:2202. 11394

  42. [50]

    Gravitational Radiation from Colliding Black Holes

    S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational Radiation from Colliding Black Holes”, Phys.Rev.Lett.26,1344

  43. [51]

    Black Holes and Entropy

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black Holes and Entropy”, Phys.Rev. D7,2333

  44. [52]

    Generalized second law of thermody- namics in black-hole physics

    J. D. Bekenstein “Generalized second law of thermody- namics in black-hole physics”, Phys.Rev.D9,3292

  45. [53]

    Logarithmic corrections to Schwarzschild and other non-extremal BH entropy in different dimensions

    A. Sen, “Logarithmic corrections to Schwarzschild and other non-extremal BH entropy in different dimensions”, DOI:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)156

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2752, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    1977 doi

  47. [55]

    The Path Integral Formulation of Gravitational Thermodynamics

    J.D. Brown, J.W. York, “The Path Integral Formulation of Gravitational Thermodynamics”, reports on the con- ference ”The Black Hole 25 Years After”, Santiago, Chile, January 1994 doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9405024

    1994 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Conversations on Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft, “Conversations on Quantum Gravity”, J. Armas (Ed.) (2021), pp275. Cambridge Press

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.