Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Reinforcement Learning from User Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.14946 v1 pith:LNHEFSO5 submitted 2025-05-20 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords userfeedbacklovealigninglearningllmspositivereactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in diverse user facing applications, aligning them with real user preferences becomes essential. Existing methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) rely on expert annotators trained on manually defined guidelines, whose judgments may not reflect the priorities of everyday users. We introduce Reinforcement Learning from User Feedback (RLUF), a framework for aligning LLMs directly to implicit signals from users in production. RLUF addresses key challenges of user feedback: user feedback is often binary (e.g., emoji reactions), sparse, and occasionally adversarial. We train a reward model, P[Love], to predict the likelihood that an LLM response will receive a Love Reaction, a lightweight form of positive user feedback, and integrate P[Love] into a multi-objective policy optimization framework alongside helpfulness and safety objectives. In large-scale experiments, we show that P[Love] is predictive of increased positive feedback and serves as a reliable offline evaluator of future user behavior. Policy optimization using P[Love] significantly raises observed positive-feedback rates, including a 28% increase in Love Reactions during live A/B tests. However, optimizing for positive reactions introduces reward hacking challenges, requiring careful balancing of objectives. By directly leveraging implicit signals from users, RLUF offers a path to aligning LLMs with real-world user preferences at scale.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Improve Large Language Model Systems with User Logs

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework distills noisy user logs into rules and preference pairs, clusters them by query and feedback, then fine-tunes either an expert adapter or a critic adapter to improve future responses.

  2. Echo: Learning from Experience Data via User-Driven Refinement

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Echo is a framework that harvests user-driven refinements of agent proposals as training signals to align models with real-world needs, demonstrated by raising code completion acceptance from 25.7% to 35.7% in production.

  3. Don't Let Bandit Feedback Pull Continual LLM-Recommender Updates Off Target

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    ABPO combines group-relative policy optimization with anchored exposure correction and asymmetric feedback handling to enable effective continual updates for LLM recommenders under bandit feedback constraints.

  4. Improve Large Language Model Systems with User Logs

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    UNO distills user logs into semi-structured rules and preferences, applies query-and-feedback clustering to handle heterogeneity, quantifies cognitive gaps to filter noise, and builds primary and reflective modules th...

Pith tools